|
Narrative
|
alt title(s): I Love Katie Holmes Discussion (moved from "I Love Katie Holmes Discussion)
From YKTTWUnunnilium: Meh; I would have far preferred Strangled By The Red String. This'll feel like the Macarena in six months. Jisu: Me too. Also, I know we've got a war on "this editor" comments going on, but I loved that comment and had to keep it in. Adam850: This trope name always seemed to me to be lawsuit bait. Probably paranoia. Susan Davis: Harry and Ginny hook up in Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince with no real build up — No, they don't. Rowling started setting those two up in book 1, and it was painfully obvious the whole time that Ginny worshipped the ground that Harry walked on. Harry, furthermore, got surly and jealous when Ginny was dating other boys, even before admitting to himself that he liked her. SAMAS: Before this erupts into a shipping war, how about a compromise, in that the relationship was set up, but not much time given to actual development. Fast Eddie: Seconded, thirded, or n-thed! The title is just asking for a buncha crap about a specific actor or a specific instance of the trope. I have no idea what it means, until reading the article, either. Howabout something that just plain old states the premise. Like Designated Relationship? Also, "This'll feel like the Macarena in six months." XD // later: Holy Cow! The actress specified doesn't even show up in the examples. Rename coming, unless defended soon. Seth: I'm a little late to the discussion but Strangled By The Red String is a much better name. So is Ass Pull Relationship (I also like the idea of something like Deus Ex Romantica) Susan Davis: So do we have consensus on renaming this to Strangled By The Red String? Ununnilium: "Her intense paranoia often shows itself in her narrative choices, as does her hostility towards fans." ...oooookay. hushicho: Okay Un, whoever the heck you are, stop editing my edits. The notation on the author — who has been proven by many sources to be this way, and if you don't believe me look it up yourself — is necessary to point out in the context of the entry. This is why those series are even in here. Please think before you continually edit someone else's work, just because you might like a series. There are series on this wiki that I like that get criticised, but I have the presence of mind to realise that they do belong in the tropes they're in. Seth: Uh - whoever you are - people editing others work is what a wiki is about and that particular segment would be edited by me as well if i saw it first. Not because it criticises a series i like (Since i dislike ranma anyway) but because it is blatantly biased and doesn't add anything. The entry works without calling her a paranoid control freak, since that is a matter of opinion. It is Writer On Board and fans reacted badly to it, that is all we need to know. An author can't really be a control freak about their own work since everything from the laws of physics to the colour of the characters underwear is already under their control. And she is hardly the first person to react badly to Fannon. We work on a sort of informal seniority here, if 5 editors including some of the most long running and respected ones in the wiki who wrote half our guidelines think your phrasing it wrong it is most probably wrong - accept that anything submitted to a wiki will be edited and may in the end by a consensus against your opinion end up totally different. Ununnilium: Hee, thanks. Basically, what Seth said; we don't need personal attacks in the entries. Roland: I don't know if the FFVIII entry is fair. The relationship between Rinoa and Squall is pretty much the core basis of the entire story, and, if you ask me, is foreshadowed and built up well in advance. It's not like Squall suddenly switches from 'antisocial loner' to 'lovestruck adolescent' in one scene... Shire Nomad: You're going to have to give examples. I don't remember seeing a scrap of evidence he thought of her as anything besides a Clingy Jealous Girl (and maybe a professional client) right up to the moment he suddenly couldn't live without her in Disc 3. Seth: It was foreshadowed yes, but not really believable. I remember when playing it when they fell in love it came totally out of the blue for me (A sort of Willing Suspension Of Disbelief breaker - or Ass Pull if you will) in hindsight you see it coming and it was hardly unexpected since most games/films have the main character hook up at some point. But if he was attracted to women then why didn't he Ununnilium: Yanking out:
Tanto: Deleted the Tales of Symphonia example because it's not really about romance. Lloyd can only "date" two members of the party, and by the point this option becomes available the romance is really irrelevant...in fact, the obvious leanings for Colette pushes this closer to a straight example in my eyes, but again, the romance is really very secondary. Morganite: How about Ar Tonelico: Melody of Elemia for an averersion of the video game type? Mind you, the player might not *know* that one of the choices involved has that sort of effect, if they haven't played before... Ronfar: I always thought of Anakin as the Stalker With A Crush... and thought that the lack of standard romantic chemistry was because Anakin was supposed to be creepy, not attractive. Why Amidala would fall for her creepy Stalker With A Crush is beyond me, though. Greenygal: "Many fans felt this way about the second Green Arrow, who was raised to be a monk with no interest in sex...until a writer swooped in and had him sleep with some girl he just met, to prove his manliness and heterosexuality. This was more or less brushed under the rug after the inevitable backlash, but it was enough to pretty much finish the character in his own series, and the writer got a quick boot out." Any source for the last sentence? The series wasn't cancelled until two years afterward, and I'd never heard anybody suggest it was due to backlash over that scene (dumb as it was). Man Called True: As per my "ask and wait before delete" policy: I wouldn't say Tidus/Yuna is a case of red-string strangulation. He's interested in her on first sight, sure, but it's fairly low-key until "Suteki Da Ne" (which is half the game away at that point) - if I recall correctly, the first time it's explicitly called love isn't until several in-game days later, at Guadosalam. Not quite so bad as Squall/Rinoa. Twin Bird: Does Jacinda really count as a Depraved Bisexual? She cheats on Gabby - and I'm not even sure I'd count it as cheating, since she's mostly honest about it. Go to that page and you find mostly killers, with a smattering of abusive partners, nonviolent sociopaths, and characters who are technically innocent but clearly Ax Crazy. She fits Anything That Moves to a T, but depraved? Andrew: Does the KOTOR example really qualify? The player-Bastilla attraction is built up for a long time before the consummating kiss, and it doesn't seem logical or out-there for these two people to fall for each other. Karalora: Edited the Avatar example to remove unnecessary and confusing bias. Pestulens: anyone considered adding the Max, Marea plot line form the original Macross (super dimensional or hyper dimensional as you prefer) They had all of three sens together and where trying to kill eatch otehr in two of them then suddenly they are getting maread. Lale: Moved the Sky High example to Relationship Writing Fumble. Rebochan: The Lupin/Tonks Word Of God is not that there had to be an orphan, but that someone had to die and it had to be someone's parent(s). Since she spared Arthur Weasly, she moved on to Lupin and Tonks. Which this troper still found to be crazy brutal, but the point is, the person who posted otherwise was claiming the wrong Word Of God. Dalantia: I really.. don't like the Bioware examples. They smell strongly of Complaining About Games You Dont Like, or in this case, complaining about choices you don't like. The fact that the rest of the party just isn't interested in the main character that way (or doesn't swing that way) doesn't make them Strangled. I'm contemplating pulling them. Later edit: Did pull them. replaced with single line about C[=RPGs=], because that's ultimately true. Idler: Surely Matt/Janice and Isaac/Simone from Heroes don't count? They were together before the beginning of the series. Peter and Simone also knew each other beforehand. Cambdoranononononono: I agree and have pulled the first two examples as a result. Anomaly: Removed the Serenity example, because like Natter had mentioned, it wasn't an example. Darmani: Awww, I miss the lovely to the point indictment of Mai Hime's main romance. Tate isn't just unsympathetic as a romantic lead its retarded I'm suppose to find Mai's confusion with him dramatically worth it versus everythind else going on. Annwyd: Pulled this:
Austin: I accidently hit the send button before the edit summary, but in the Ben 10 tree, I deleted a link to a Deviant Art picture said to sum up fans feelings with Ben telling the two to just get together and stop taking up his screen time. From what I've read on this site, the problem isn't Will Theyor Wont They, but the potential relationship existing at all.
Taelor: removed the Naruto example, as even the person who wrote it admits that it does not qualify. Zeke: Cut from the TNG example:
Lale: Mai's and Zuko's childhood romance makes them a New Old Flame example. |
