Working Title: Absolutely No Posthumanism:
From YKTTW
This troper submits that the reason why mass-produced superhumans are generally depicted as evil is because it hits too close to the goals of Nazi German and Japanese scientists. It's perfectly fine to have mass-produced machines, because machines aren't supposed to have or desire individuality. All known, normal human cultures, however, desire individuality to a significant degree; even military organizations allow soldiers to progress along different specializations.
Gattsuru: That seems more of an argument against space marines. As
Ghost In The Shell demonstrates, you can easily have an entirely transhuman cast and still keep everyone highly individualized — often more individualized than you would otherwise. Togusa would just be a normal Joe with a weird taste in guns, normally, but in a transhuman world it makes him a rather interesting three-dimensional character with touches of neophobia.
I expect it's more because of the
Squick — a strongly transhuman world brings up some ugly questions — and because it's harder to write a world where the average Joe can access more information than the modern savant can, leap thirty feet from a standing start, and lift two hundred pounds one-handed (the fairly 'weak' transhuman world of Star Trek).
Eric DVH: Removed the following, since this sort of wankery makes about as much sense as scribbling real life examples for, say,
Become A Real Boy:
Real Life
- Well, Real Life: and not simply because the Moral Guardians are opposed to it. The American FDA and foreign counterparts simply don't have a viable method for testing drugs to make someone better than normal, and technologies that can allow superhuman speed or strength are largely left for specialized tasks due to social beliefs (and the goofy appearance of those technologies).
- But of course all that DARPA research is going to pay off in the civilian field soon. Any
day decade now.
- Still faster than waiting for someone else to do it. Dammit.
Filby: Is it just me or are half the examples aversions? Maybe we should shift the focus of the article to transhumanism in general.