|
Narrative
|
Just deleted the "Fight Club/Calvin and Hobbes" example. That's not so much a "Jesus in Purgatory" as "crossover fiction/wild mass guessing" example.
The <Blank> is Jesus in Purgatory Game! Moogle Gunner: Am I the only who has ever played this game with RL friends? It's great fun, really, as long as your friends have a semblance of intelligence. Sci Vo: I don't get the name. Alexandra Erin: A combination of two things, as I take it. The first the tendency for literary critics/analysts to label EVERYBODY and their brother a "messiah" or "Christ figure" Okay, Simon from the Lord of the Flies, maybe... but fricking LENNY from Of Mice and Men? Apparently, all it takes is for somebody to be an innocent in any sense of the word and for them to die before you reach the back cover for them to be fricking Jesus. The second is summed up by the (now deleted, I think) WMG entry for Harry Potter: "The kids are all dead, and Hogwarts is purgatory. Somebody had to say it." In other words, when somebody is really reaching to find the symbolism, these are the two places they're most likely to reach. Though from that analysis, I'd say it should be describing a "What Do You Mean Its Not Symbolic?" being perpetrated by the audience rather than the creators, which the first two examples don't seem to bear out. Air Of Mystery: I'm curious: who started the idea of this in the WMG? I mean, I added a few examples to some WMGs because I thought it was a serious WMG trope by the time I got there. Who did the original one? Seven Seals: This comes from Final Fantasy VII, which evolved to include the claim that, well, everyone is Jesus in purgatory. Andyzero: Well, Revolutionary Girl Utena and Haibane Renmei were serious suppositions about the series being in Purgatory. Then someone did My Name Is Earl ; a comedy series with someone being in Purgatory. After that, it started being a joke methinks. Air Of Mystery: Holy freaking crap! I was the guy who said Sephiroth was Jesus! Sure, it's an obvious thing to say, but man, I helped create a minor in-joke. That's cool. Khym Chanur: Would this be a cause (perhaps the leading one) of the people who thought that the Harry Potter series were Deep and Meaningful, and were disappointed when it turned out that They Were Only Children's Books All Along? Pepinson: You say that as if it's a bad thing. Alexandra Erin: As Hagrid is my witness, this base blasphemy will not stand!!!
Pro-Mole: Actually, I'm just to notice that this trope is one of those I think couldn't be in oblivion forever. And also to know if anybody else heard of real authors flunking in tests about their own works, or that's just a Brazilian Urban Legend of sorts. Sikon: "Neon Genesis Evangelion. Full stop. Although, that was really the point." What exactly was the point? Pro-Mole: I guess that's the point. puritybrown: Cut out this bit:
Indigo: X-Men is not a metaphor for homosexuality — or, more accurately, it wasn't, originally. Humans vs. Mutants was the civil rights struggle. Charles Xavier was Martin Luther King Jr. and Magneto, Malcolm X. The movies were more a metaphor for homosexuality given director Brian Singer is gay himself. Darkblade: It's been like that in the comics since the late 80s when characters like Northstar and Pixie started showing up and subsiquently coming out. The Ultimate universe defidently plays the homosexual angle over the race angle. Po8: IMHO the state of this page is pretty awful, and I'm tempted to clean it up. Take most of the "This editor" stuff into a separate page, probably in WMG. Move most of the content of some of the more elaborate entries (e.g. Narnia) onto the page for the work in question. Any opinions? Po8: Changed my mind. Way too much work, and I'm not sure exactly what I want to do yet. But I still think the page is a mess; maybe someone else will take it on. Pro-Mole: So, I started the thing, but then someone added up (it's highlighted for your convenience) and now I'm confused:
Meta Four: Some relevant song lyrics. I'ma just dump them here rather than turning the front into more of a quote fest.
fleb: Removed the link to Yahoo News, infamous for expiring their links and thus screwing over everyone who ever links to them. It's from almost a whole year ago. Original version:
slb: That New York Times article in the Metal Gear Solid 4 section is ridiculous. Although the games' inner plots consist of Thirty Xanatos Pileups, the overall themes are dead-obvious in each one. The columnist shrouds each game in "mystery" to cater to the idea that "games are just something we older folk can't get." MGS 1 warns about reckless nuclear proliferation and not allowing your heritage/genes control your life — nobody needs to see more than the ending movie to figure that out. MGS 2 is about the dangers of censorship and the superpowerful U.S. government. They're clearer than any movie I've seen, yet the mainstream media cries the mantra "Video games! All is smoke and mirrors! All is mystery! The new generation speaks a foreign language! We understand nothing!" Of course, why bother doing the research for video games, a childish medium that no one takes seriously, right? BritBllt: Removing this one...
|
