|
Narrative
|
Caswin: Removing the following entry (and, by necessity, its amusing follow-up) on the following grounds: First, Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgment. Second, I can honestly say that, buffoonish or not, I've seen his speeches and can attest that he (or whoever writes his speeches) is not stupid enough to make "the Middle East is evil" the heart, let alone the breadth, of his argument.
This article could use some references to philosophers. Specifically the Chinese philosopher Mencius, who comes right out and says that he doesn't like arguing, and basically just tries to shut his opponents up. Book VI Part A in particular is chock full of Chewbacca defenses. Ununnilium: ...add it, then? Wareq: I'll just leave this  here
Vulpy:
Flysh: Re-added the above, as it was removed, and am also going to pre-emptively state that the bottom edit is just a joke. EDIT: One that appears to have already been made. Curse This Troper 's wit! Caswin: I deleted a line universally declaring debate to be about who makes the better impression, not who's right or wrong. I can personally attest that that isn't the case. However, I have to ask about silence equaling consent being not only commonly (not to say accurately) recognized, but a "basic concept of Argumentation and Debate". What's that about? |
This wiki is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
