troperville

tools

toys


main index

Narrative

Genre

Media

Topical Tropes

Other Categories

TV Tropes Org
random
Headscratchers: Star Trek V: The Final Frontier
    open/close all folders 

    Romulan ships need not apply 
  • Sybok's whole reason for invading Paradise City and holding the population for ransom was to get his hands on a starship. The thing is, a new Romulan Ambassador showed up on the planet minutes before the attack. Why didn't Sybok and co. just nab that one? There was a good chance it was still orbiting the planet, since the Ambassador didn't seem to have time to tell her ship that she'd met up with her Federation and Klingon counterparts and all was well. Or, if it had left, shouldn't it logically have been the first ship to arrive at Nimbus III when the distress calls went out, since it couldn't have been all that far away, even at high Warp?
    • Nimbus III was not a great assignment; in fact, Star Trek The VI The Undiscovered Country shows that the Romulan government actually has an ambassador on Earth, so Nimbus III representative was completely useless. It's unlikely that anybody who was given the position of ambassador to that world was particularly favored by the government that sent them there. Add that to the fact that the Neutral Zone is a DMZ, and it seems unlikely that the Romulans would assign a warship to drop her off. Sybok needed something fast and powerful like a cruiser to get where he needed to go, and to get anyone to send one, he needed a crisis. He's just lucky that Starfleet responded first, as the Romulans or the Klingons probably would have resolved the situation with much more violence.
    • Which makes the plan even more foolish since Sybok's only hope is to steal a Starfleet vessel, because if the Romulans or Klingons get there first then they'll all be killed.
      • The Klingon ambassador, Koord, has explicitly been given the Nimbus III assignment because he's out of favour. The Klingons were hardly likely to rustle up the cavalry for his sake.
      • They might have... it's Klingons, after all, they'd probably be pretty big on the principle of the thing. ("You dare threaten one of our people, even if it is that miserable pah'tok Koord?!") Sybok may have just planned to do or have one of his acolytes do some really fast talking if it was the Romulans or Klingons that showed up.

    The film that never happened 
  • This may be wonderment about fan reaction more than the film itself, so this may not qualify as a headscratcher (delete away if necessary!), but I have always been curious about the impulse to de-canonize this film. True it's terrible, but it's hardly alone in this among installments of Star Trek, and bad episodes do not usually get struck from canon just for being bad. Roddenberry himself apparently made remarks to the effect that this film and the next one have "apocryphal" elements but was vague about what this means. It would appear to me that, in spite of its awfulness, the film does little to actively "harm" canon, thanks in part to its small scale. True, Sybok's very existence is a bit dubious and neither the trip to the galactic core nor the timeline for Nimbus III's foundation make much sense, but compared to Star Trek: Nemesis (or even Star Trek 2009), the film does little to actively damage the universe of Star Trek; its iffy characterizations are best ignored and the film collects dust on a great many shelves, but is that the same thing as de-canonization?
    • Just in case someone is NEW to this film and all the speculation, I THINK Shatner himself has conceded that it "Was all just a dream" and the film lends itself to this, opening and closing with Row, Row, Row your boat. I think it's also stated somewhere on this wiki, and that explanation works best. The DCU Comic Book was a better story than the movie explaining away all the headscratchers. (I wish I still had my copy ) Including Kirk's brother. What movie goers fail to realize is that there was a writer's strike and cost overruns that ruined the movie before it began. Even Shatner knew it as he was filming, but by God, he gave 110%, as only superham Shatner can. This movie is a winner only because of sheer BALLS expended in order just to get it made with all the REAL WORLD problems happening. So stop thinking of it as a Star Trek movie and put it in the same box as the TNG holodeck stories where they went to Sherwood just to break the tension and have a little fun.
    • Heh. The Sherwood thing was a Q episode. I think the problem folks have with the movie is that it'd be one thing if it was an episode that contributed nothing to the canon (who wants to count how many episodes there were of that in every Trek series?), but a movie has to have higher stakes. And high stakes are certainly promised, with the question to locate God, but the sloppy execution and real-world problems left you with a huge mess. I think it's the same reason so many folks have trouble with the first movie and the last two TNG films. Adding to that the film being so critically panned that they almost pulled the plug on Star Trek movies forever and you can see why fans pretend this never happened.
      • Shatner at least wanted to deliver on the promise to find God (or rather, Satan) but was talked out of it by the studio.

    Gone to Center of Galaxy, Be Back in a Sec 
  • In Star Trek V, the Final Frontier, the Enterprise travels to the center of the galaxy in just a few hours. For the sake of my argument, let's just say they did it in 3 hours. That's, more or less, 26,000 light years in 3 hours. Now, on Voyager, Janeway and the gang get displaced 70,000 light years. And it's going to take them 70 years or so to get home. If this is the case, why in the hell didn't Janeway travel at the same speed that Kirk did in Star Trek V? She could have gotten back to earth in less than 10 hours. Plus, she's even in a more advanced ship than Kirk's.
    • You thought Star Trek V was actually supposed to make sense?
    • God did it. Kirk killed him.
    • This is precisely why this editor does not view Star Trek V as canon. There has been a theory on this website, somewhere that there was a "warp highway" to the centre of the galaxy, a warp highway being a region of space where your warp engine power is enhanced so you go faster with less fuel. And the reason Janeway and co couldn't use it? They only exist for a finite amount of time.
    • Who said it was "The centre of the galaxy"? A crazy person with a messiah complex and people who had been mind controlled by said crazy person. Personally I wouldn't trust his directions to the head.
      • I know this isn't really what the movie had in mind, but maybe it can be ret-conned as saying that it wasn't the physical center of the galaxy, but what the Vulcans used to believe was the "spiritual" center, a region of space mysteriously blocked off by the Great Barrier. If there's a discrepancy in the Star Trek universe between the visible galaxy and the dark matter halo around it, maybe the Barrier surrounds the halo's center, which happens to be a whole, whole lot closer to Earth than the real galactic core.
    • This is just one of the more egregious Star Trek speed errors. TNG had the Enterprise end up over 2 MILLION light years from Earth and Data says that it would take approximately 100 years to get home. By contrast, Voyager going 70,000 light years would taken 70 years. That means the Enterprise D could go 20 times faster than Voyager... it's fair to say that writers really need to try and leave distances out because they ALWAYS screw them up and end up travelling at the speed of plot.
      • Warp 10 = 1,000c; the Designated top Speed applies WITHIN the Galaxy. 2M ly is empty space BETWEEN galaxies. Maybe you can go faster if there ain't all thse frackin stars in the way?
      • Four days from Earth to Qo'noS at Warp 5. 'nuff said.
    • Remember the TNG episode "The Nth Degree?" An alien species living near the center of the Galaxy, who just appeared as incorporeal giant floating heads, contacted a single, very special mind and gave his brain a boost, so he was able to bring the ship there in no time. Maybe "God" was an insane, criminal member of that species, imprisoned behind the Great Barrier by his fellows?
    • also a perhaps case of Critical Research Failure, since according to the other wiki, it had been known since 1974 (and perhaps postulated for some time prior) that there was a black hole with about 4.31 million solar masses at the centre of the galaxy, so travel there in real life would be suicide anyways.

     Do Not Use Toilet In Spacedock 
Fridge Logic time. In Star Trek V, there is a toilet in the brig that warns: "DO NOT USE WHILE IN SPACEDOCK". So... why would there be a problem with this? Maybe it's just sadistic Schmuck Bait for the rulebreakers in the brig? And nobody gives a crap when they need to take a crap, of course. I'm wondering if it's All There in the Manual.
  • I never noticed this. However, this might be a joke. I don't know how it is in other countries, but here in the Netherlands you are prohibited to use the toilet in the train while it is parked at a station. Because of the fact that you are crapping down a tube down straight onto the tracks.
  • Possibly that's when they detach and clean the pipes which would otherwise connect the ship's toilets to a replicator/recycler.
  • Once you get to Spacedock, whoever is in the brig is taken to the Spacedock's brig. There shouldn't be anyone except maintenece in there anyway, so not flushing could mean the difference between sucking Ricky Redshirt out into space.
    • Presumably there must be some working lavatories onboard for those maintenance crews to use—hopefully something more comfortable and private than a fold-away prison toilet.

     George? Who's George? 
  • After the death of Sybok, Kirk offers Spock comfort in what should be a Crowning Moment of Heartwarming, saying "I lost a brother once. I was lucky to get him back." Kirk's obviously referencing Spock, and the events of Star Trek II and III, and when Kirk says that he lost a brother, both McCoy and Spock give a small look of surprise before they realize who Kirk is talking about. The thing is, Kirk did loose his actual brother, George Kirk, who died horribly in Operation Annihilate!. In fact, both Spock and Bones were with Kirk on the away team that found George's corpse. Doesn't that kind of move Kirks statement to Spock from heartwarming to borderline sociopathy?
    • It's quite possible that Kirk was MUCH closer to Spock than he ever was to George. It's not sociopathy to be distant from your nuclear family.
    • The way the quote is delivered and phrase is also rather specific. It's not denying the fact that George existed or even forgetting about him, it's simply referencing Spock's death and rebirth.
      • Exactly. Kirk could hypothetically have said "I lost two brothers. I was lucky to get one of them back." But no doubt that would be confusing for audience members without long memories. But nothing about the wording as is excludes losing a second brother.

     Here's a Warship, Go Do Whatever 
  • What's going on with Klaa, the commander of the Klingon bird-of-prey? He's introduced to us when he destroys Pioneer 10, which SF Debris points out will only be barely outside our solar system (Starfleet headquarters and the capitol of the Federation) by the 23rd century. He takes on the mission to Nimbus III just because he's bored, and on his own initiative, he launches an unprovoked attack on Enterprise which was engaged in rescuing diplomats (including a Klingon official) from a hostage situation. Then, he follows Enterprise literally to the center of the galaxy just to launch another unprovoked attack. Does Klaa answer to the Klingon military? If he does, why would it allow Klaa to so casually risk war with the Federation and—considering the Romulan ambassador aboard Enterprise, and their eagerness to kill Klingons at the slightest provocation—the Romulan Empire?
    • Pioneer 10 being as far out as it was could be an example of Sci-Fi Writers Have No Sense of Scale. Even Voyager 1 hasn't left our Solar System yet (as of 2013), but Star Trek: The Motion Picture had a fictional Voyager 6 far enough out of our solar system to be sucked into a black hole.
      • Well, if I remember correctly, Star Trek: The Motion Picture had a wormhole appearing smack-dab between Jupiter and Saturn all due to a warp imbalance.
    • At the end, Klaa is seen apologizing to Kirk for his actions (with Koord looming over him indimidatingly) and emphasizing that his actions were taken without approval of the High Council. Basically, since he didn't actually manage to hurt anyone, and his following of the Enterprise led to the rescue of Kirk, he wasn't executed for his violating his orders (probably something along the lines of "here's a sector, stay here and patrol it"). If you look closely in the next film you can see that Klaa has been removed from starship command and put on translation duty, so it's obvious that he pissed someone off, but not enough to get executed for it.
    • To the Klingons, Kirk is a wanted criminal who basically got away scot-free for killing a Klingon lord and capturing a Bird-of-Prey. Maybe Klaa figured that delivering his head on a silver platter would get him a promotion.
Star Trek II: The Wrath of KhanHeadscratchers/FilmStar Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
Star Trek IV: The Voyage HomeHeadscratchers/Star TrekStar Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country

random
TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy
18404
37