Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / FaceOff

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moved from fridge

Added DiffLines:

* If Troy and Archer have differing blood types and this fact is a plot point in getting Archer's wife to realize Archer is Troy, how come Archer's body didn't reject Troy's face when it was put on him?
** Anti-rejection drugs. [[TechnologyMarchesOn These days]] people that get RealLife facial transplants need to take them for basically the rest of their lives.
** Same applies to any transplant really.
*** Yeah, but that's not mentioned: they never take any either.
*** The film has advanced medical tech to grow an ear from scratch and transplant someone's face onto someone else, and the doctor even mentioned the anti-inflammatories they have help healing in days rather than weeks. With these in mind, it's not hard to imagine they managed to make some form of anti-rejection that doesn't have to be taken very much, maybe even a pump device that does so.
** Also, the latency of rejection varies between people; some people reject in days and some take weeks. It could be that rejection never came up as an issue because it wasn't happening to a noticeable degree yet. Even if Castor had to be on any kind of medication, he could easily be disguising them as painkillers, and nobody would question it because he is pretending to be an Agent in a high stress job.
*** Taking that further, it could be that Archer was given anti-rejection medication that would last for at least a few weeks to ensure he could convincingly pass as Castor without Pollux noticing any inexplicable medical needs, and as previously speculated, Castor could be disguising his own medication as standard painkillers.
* How does his wife not notice his ''penis'' is different? Something brought up by many critics, including Creator/RogerEbert.
** It's implied that the couple haven't been having sexual relations for a while. Beyond that they two may not have that different a penis. It's not exactly a one of a kind part.
** An early draft of the script had a line stating that Castor and Archer had virtually identical body types and, yes, penis sizes. While the line isn't in the film, I imagine the idea must have still been in mind.
* How did Castor learn the identities of everyone who's aware of Archer going undercover as him so fast? You could assume he had Dr. Walsh coerced into giving up the others, but they all arrive simultaneously.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** He would also have had the advantage that it's unlikely anyone would have thought to test the bullet in Loomis against 'Archer's' gun; with so many different guns being fired that night, determining exactly who fired which bullet wouldn't particularly matter, especially when Loomis would have died so soon after the rest of the agents on the raid that nobody would be able to confirm he actually died ''after'' the main fight was over. Hell the cops might think he caught an unlucky headshot or that Castor was startled.

to:

** He Castor would also have had the advantage that it's unlikely anyone would have thought to test the bullet in Loomis against 'Archer's' gun; with gun. With so many different guns being fired that night, determining exactly who fired which bullet wouldn't particularly matter, especially when Loomis would have died so soon after the rest of the agents on the raid that nobody would be able to confirm he actually died ''after'' the main fight was over. Hell Hell, even if they work out that it was "Archer" who shot him, the cops might think he caught an unlucky headshot or that Castor "Archer" was startled.



** That's not even getting into the fact of exactly ''how'' Archer managed to adopt, you know, the son of his most personal and hated nemesis, apart from that, imagine you adopted the child of the person who murdered your child, then that child grows up, puberty kicks in and hey, guess who he looks like?

to:

** That's not even getting into the fact of exactly ''how'' Archer managed to adopt, you know, the son of his most personal and hated nemesis, apart nemesis. Apart from that, imagine you adopted the child of the person who murdered your child, then that child grows up, puberty kicks in and hey, guess who he looks like?
** To be fair, the boy doesn't look that much like Castor at the moment. As for how Archer found him, Sasha's social circle is probably small enough that it wouldn't be hard to track down people she would have trusted with her son who wouldn't have been involved in recent events.




to:

** The scar isn't exactly proof of anything; if she was actually dealing with Castor Troy, the man seems crazy enough to have had himself shot to lend weight to such a seemingly insane story.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why can't Sean simply show his chest to his wife? While he tries to convince her after she's out of bathroom, why does he try a lot? He had kept the scar having resulted from the murder of his son before the surgery. This little detail was not even forgotten at the end of the movie, when he said "You can remove that scar now," making the audience feel he's finally freed from the trauma, after defeating Castor. Then, why can't he show that scar while it's there, to his wife? She wouldn't need to take the blood simple from the man sleeping in her bed, risking his finding out about her sudden escape to her hospital in the middle of the night...

to:

* Why can't Sean simply show his chest to his wife? While he tries to convince her after she's out of bathroom, why does he try a lot? He had kept the scar having resulted from the murder of his son before the surgery. This little detail was not even forgotten at the end of the movie, when he said "You can remove that scar now," making the audience feel he's finally freed from the trauma, after defeating Castor. Then, why can't he show that scar while it's there, to his wife? She wouldn't need to take the blood simple sample from the man sleeping in her bed, risking his finding out about her sudden escape to her hospital in the middle of the night...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why can't Sean simply show his chest to his wife?
While he tries to convince her after she's out of bathroom, why does he try a lot? He had kept the scar having resulted from the murder of his son before the surgery. This little detail was not even forgotten at the end of the movie, when he said "You can remove that scar now," making the audience feel he's finally freed from the trauma, after defeating Castor. Then, why can't he show that scar while it's there, to his wife? She wouldn't need to take the blood simple from the man sleeping in her bed, risking his finding out about her sudden escape to her hospital in the middle of the night...

to:

* Why can't Sean simply show his chest to his wife?
wife? While he tries to convince her after she's out of bathroom, why does he try a lot? He had kept the scar having resulted from the murder of his son before the surgery. This little detail was not even forgotten at the end of the movie, when he said "You can remove that scar now," making the audience feel he's finally freed from the trauma, after defeating Castor. Then, why can't he show that scar while it's there, to his wife? She wouldn't need to take the blood simple from the man sleeping in her bed, risking his finding out about her sudden escape to her hospital in the middle of the night...

Added: 599

Changed: 51

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Why can't Sean simply show his chest to his wife?
While he tries to convince her after she's out of bathroom, why does he try a lot? He had kept the scar having resulted from the murder of his son before the surgery. This little detail was not even forgotten at the end of the movie, when he said "You can remove that scar now," making the audience feel he's finally freed from the trauma, after defeating Castor. Then, why can't he show that scar while it's there, to his wife? She wouldn't need to take the blood simple from the man sleeping in her bed, risking his finding out about her sudden escape to her hospital in the middle of the night...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Plus Archer said the only person Pollux would talk to about anything really is Castor. He would die before telling them anything.

Added: 310

Changed: 97

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Castor read's Eve's diary, and finds out that they hadn't slept together for 6 months, and seeing as it's implied before Castor killed Michael, Archer was much more "fun" and energetic, only to lapse into workaholism and depression, perhaps the nights they did sleep together before the 6 month dry spell, weren't very... enthusiastic, and she wrote off his sudden increased sex drive as the weight being lifted off after finally "killing Castor".

to:

** Castor read's Eve's diary, and finds out that they hadn't slept together for 6 months, and seeing as it's implied before Castor killed Michael, Archer was much more "fun" and energetic, only to lapse into workaholism and depression, perhaps the nights they did sleep together before the 6 month dry spell, weren't very... enthusiastic, and she wrote off his sudden increased sex drive as the weight being lifted off after finally "killing Castor".
Castor" and stopping his last deed.



** He would also have had the advantage that it's unlikely anyone would have thought to test the bullet in Loomis against 'Archer's' gun; with so many criminals firing shots that night, determining exactly who fired which bullet wouldn't particularly matter, especially when Loomis would have died so soon after the rest of the agents on the raid that nobody would be able to confirm he actually died ''after'' the main fight was over. Hell the cops might think he caught an unlucky headshot or that Castor was startled.

to:

** He would also have had the advantage that it's unlikely anyone would have thought to test the bullet in Loomis against 'Archer's' gun; with so many criminals firing shots different guns being fired that night, determining exactly who fired which bullet wouldn't particularly matter, especially when Loomis would have died so soon after the rest of the agents on the raid that nobody would be able to confirm he actually died ''after'' the main fight was over. Hell the cops might think he caught an unlucky headshot or that Castor was startled.



** Perhaps the LAPD investigated, but since there were no records of Archer or Castor ever being at the Institute (this thing was done entirely off the bookies), they probably were able to prove that yes, someone deliberately tied up Dr. Walsh, Miller and Tito, then burned down the building. Without any evidence to tie Castor to the Institute, he won't be considered a suspect. The LAPD is able to prove that Tito and Miller were there, but since the plastic surgery was off-the-books, that's all they can prove, and to them, it may seem like they were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

to:

** Perhaps the LAPD Robbery-Homicide Division investigated, but since there were no records of Archer or Castor ever being at the Institute (this thing was done entirely off the bookies), they probably were able to prove that yes, someone deliberately tied up Dr. Walsh, Miller and Tito, then burned down the building. Without any evidence to tie Castor to the Institute, he won't be considered a suspect. The LAPD is able to prove that Tito and Miller were there, but since the plastic surgery was off-the-books, that's all they can prove, and to them, it may seem like they were in the wrong place at the wrong time.



* Why don't they just torture Pollux for the bomb's location?

to:

* Why don't they just torture interrogate Pollux for the bomb's location?


Added DiffLines:

*Okay, it's obvious Joan was going to be upset about Archer going away on assignment. I mean, what spouse wouldn't be? But even though Archer was under explicit orders not to tell anyone what the assignment was, surely his wife would be one such person who should be in the know, in case something went wrong?

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Castor read's Eve's diary, and finds out that they hadn't slept together for 6 months, and seeing as it's implied before Castor killed Michael, Archer was much more "fun" and energetic, only to lapse into workaholism and depression, perhaps the nights they did sleep together before the 6 month dry spell, weren't very... enthusiastic, and she wrote off his sudden increased sex drive as the weight being lifted off after finally "killing Castor".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** That's not even getting into the fact of exactly ''how'' Archer managed to adopt, you know, the son of his most personal and hated nemesis, apart from that, imagine you adopted the child of the person who murdered your child, then that child grows up, puberty kicks in and hey, guess who he looks like?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Easy - the doctor was scared shitless and did the one thing that gave him a decent chance of living a little longer; rational analysis likely didn't even come into it. Turned out he was wrong but what can you do?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Or Troy was branching out and going into business for himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Simple: Torture is ''completely useless'' for getting genuine information.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The hard part may have been removing the two faces in such a fashion that neither the face nor the various underlying structures would be damaged, not the attachment process. If so, the team already did ''that'' part; Walsh just went through the procedure they'd already laid the groundwork for, having intended to perform it on Archer himself once his mission was over.

to:

** The hard part may have been removing the two faces in such a fashion that neither the face nor the various underlying structures would be damaged, not the attachment process. If so, the team already did ''that'' part; Walsh just went through the procedure they'd already laid the groundwork for, having intended to perform it on Archer himself to reverse the surgery once his mission was over.



** He would also have had the advantage that it's unlikely anyone would have thought to test the bullet in Loomis against 'Archer's' gun; with so many criminals firing shots that night, determining exactly who fired which bullet wouldn't particularly matter, especially when Loomis would have died so soon after the rest of the agents on the raid that nobody would be able to confirm he actually died ''after'' the main fight was over.

to:

** He would also have had the advantage that it's unlikely anyone would have thought to test the bullet in Loomis against 'Archer's' gun; with so many criminals firing shots that night, determining exactly who fired which bullet wouldn't particularly matter, especially when Loomis would have died so soon after the rest of the agents on the raid that nobody would be able to confirm he actually died ''after'' the main fight was over.
over. Hell the cops might think he caught an unlucky headshot or that Castor was startled.



** Maybe Castor threatened to torture him and slaughter his family.

to:

** Maybe Castor threatened to torture him and slaughter his family.



** As was said before, the police investigation would undoubtedly prove arson, and the bodies were identified. However, Archer's surgery was done off-the-books, meaning that only a few people truly knew that Archer was impersonating Castor, and thanks to the arson, all of them are dead save for Archer and Castor. As far as anyone not in on the job sees it, Castor had just been shipped off to Erewhon Prison while Archer was away on an unknown assignment.

to:

** As was said before, the police investigation would undoubtedly prove arson, and the bodies were identified. However, Archer's surgery was done off-the-books, meaning that only a few people truly knew that Archer was impersonating Castor, and thanks to the arson, all of them are dead save for Archer and Castor. As far as anyone not in on the job sees it, Castor had just been shipped off to Erewhon Prison while Archer was away on an unknown assignment. As for Tito, Feds might believe he was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Hell, it might even be believed that the Walsh Institute fire was started by a third party trying to cover up an unrelated incident.

Added: 105

Changed: 62

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Actually Pollux did have a pistol. You can see him raise it as Archer swings over on the rope and he is about to shoot when Archer slams into him and knocks him into the skylight, and he falls to his death.

to:

** Actually Pollux did have a pistol. You can see him raise it as Archer swings over on the rope and he is about to shoot when Archer slams into him and knocks him into the skylight, and he falls to his death.






** Perhaps the LAPD investigated, but since there were no records of Archer or Castor ever being at the Institute, they probably were able to prove that yes, someone deliberately tied up Dr. Walsh, Hollis Miller and Tito, then burned down the building. Without any evidence to tie Castor to the Institute, he won't be considered a suspect. The LAPD is able to prove that Tito and Miller were there, but since the plastic surgery was off-the-books, that's all they can prove, and to them, it may seem like they were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

to:

** Perhaps the LAPD investigated, but since there were no records of Archer or Castor ever being at the Institute, Institute (this thing was done entirely off the bookies), they probably were able to prove that yes, someone deliberately tied up Dr. Walsh, Hollis Walsh, Miller and Tito, then burned down the building. Without any evidence to tie Castor to the Institute, he won't be considered a suspect. The LAPD is able to prove that Tito and Miller were there, but since the plastic surgery was off-the-books, that's all they can prove, and to them, it may seem like they were in the wrong place at the wrong time.


Added DiffLines:

**Without anyone else except Archer himself to back up her claim, it might take a while to convince them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** He would also have had the advantage that it's unlikely anyone would have thought to test the bullet in Loomis against 'Archer's' gun; with so many criminals firing shots that night, determining exactly who fired which bullet wouldn't particularly matter, especially when Loomis would have died so soon after the rest of the agents on the raid that nobody would be able to confirm he actually died ''after'' the main fight was over.

Added: 391

Changed: 369

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Archer's boss makes a big deal about how they don't have any concrete proof that there ''is'' a bomb. I don't think it's legal to torture someone over something they don't know for sure is a real thing. (I don't even think it's legal for them to torture even if they knew the bomb was real, but they might be able to utilize more extreme measures if they had proof.)
* Sasha tells Archer that she brought her son to stay with relatives or friends before the confrontation at the funeral...If that's the case, how did Archer find him in order to adopt him, and how was he able to take him from the last people his mother had left him with? I know Sasha had told Sean to look after the boy before she died, but that was because she still thought he was Castor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Why don't they just torture Pollux for the bomb's location?

to:

** * Why don't they just torture Pollux for the bomb's location?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Why don't they just torture Pollux for the bomb's location?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Even if the other surgeons knew the details on the surgery, all they knew about was that Archer was given Castor's face. Dr. Walsh was the only one at the hospital who knew about Castor being given Archer's.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Why didn't Archer's wife tell anyone about the facial transplant before the shootout at the funeral?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** No less a luminary than [[RiffTrax Michael J. Nelson]] also pointed out just how absurdly expensive the prison must be to operate, especially with the electromagnetic lockdown grid and special boots all prisoners have to wear. And why the need for such exorbitantly expensive technology when your prison is in the middle of an ocean and any escapees would be ludicrously easy to recapture? Sure, Archer got away, but that was only because the guys in charge of Erehwon were too stupid to search for him. Also, [[ArtisticLicenseLaw "The Geneva Convention does not apply here"]]? No shit, dude, it doesn't apply to ''anyone'' who's not a P.O.W. Come to think of it, "the guys in charge of Erehwon were too stupid" just might be the best answer to all our questions.

to:

** No less a luminary than [[RiffTrax [[Podcast/RiffTrax Michael J. Nelson]] also pointed out just how absurdly expensive the prison must be to operate, especially with the electromagnetic lockdown grid and special boots all prisoners have to wear. And why the need for such exorbitantly expensive technology when your prison is in the middle of an ocean and any escapees would be ludicrously easy to recapture? Sure, Archer got away, but that was only because the guys in charge of Erehwon were too stupid to search for him. Also, [[ArtisticLicenseLaw "The Geneva Convention does not apply here"]]? No shit, dude, it doesn't apply to ''anyone'' who's not a P.O.W. Come to think of it, "the guys in charge of Erehwon were too stupid" just might be the best answer to all our questions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's possible the other doctors weren't informed who their patient or the donor really was, as a security protocol and/or to ensure they'd have plausible deniability. Even if there's never a formal inquiry into what went down so they wouldn't get called to testify about a morally-dubious counterterrorism op, ''cutting off an unconscious prisoner's face'' with neither medical necessity nor consent is hardly in compliance with the Hippocratic Oath.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The hard part may have been removing the two faces in such a fashion that neither the face nor the various underlying structures would be damaged, not the attachment process. If so, the team already did ''that'' part; Walsh just went through the procedure they'd already laid the groundwork for, having intended to perform it on Archer himself once his mission was over.

Top