Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Chess

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
removed accidental bit


** Actually, that's a
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added comment

Added DiffLines:

** This was never actually a thing; it's just a hoax. The original FIDE Laws of Chess from 1930 specified that castling is possible only with a king and a rook on the same rank.
** Actually, that's a
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
this is more direct


** "You aren't allowed to put your own king in check, therefore White cannot move their bishop out of the pin, therefore Black can move their king to a square that the bishop attacks, therefore you are allowed to put your own king in check."

to:

** "You aren't allowed to put your own king in check, therefore White cannot move their If check prevents the bishop from moving out of the pin, therefore Black can move their then it prevents the black king to a square that from moving into the bishop attacks, therefore you are allowed to put your own king bishop's attack in check."the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** "You aren't allowed to put your own king in check, therefore White cannot move their bishop out of the pin, therefore Black can move their king to a square that the bishop attacks, therefore you are allowed to put your own king in check."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Why is a position like [[https://lichess.org/editor/3kR3/2pp3r/8/7B/8/8/8/7K_w_-_-_0_1?color=white this one]] considered checkmate? After all, if the black king could take the white rook, the white bishop could not take the black king due to being pinned.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Is the in-universe King of the real life World Champion the ruler of the [in-universe] world, or at least a very powerful overlord; because, you know, he just defeated some of the most powerful other lords out there?
** That would make sense, provided all chess games depict battles in the same in-universe world.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* It is the in-universe King of the real life World Champion the ruler of the [in-universe] world, or at least a very powerful overlord; because, you know, he just defeated some of the most powerful other lords out there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


!!The Game



----
!!The Play

* Why does it not occur to Anatoly to win until ''Talking Chess''?
** Obviously, you've never met Korchnoi.
** I think it does, but with all the stuff going on around him, Vigaand is just better than him. Until Anatoly calms down and focuses on actually playing the game, he's just not capable of winning

* In the Concept Album, what's the "news" that Freddie has for Florence at the end? It wasn't very clear.
** The news is about her father, but it's left to the audience to decide if he's dead or alive.

* Why would Freddie be so complicit in being used by Walter and Molokov? He didn't take orders from Florence when she asked him to make nice with the press.
** Probably a lot of it is his own basic arrogance. He's so sure he's in control of the game that he can't imagine himself as anybody else's pawn. (And he's also got a lot of built-up contempt and resentment against women in general, which would more than likely make him distrust Florence's advice on principle.)
** Could he ever have a functioning relationship with her if he somehow managed to resolve his [[FreudianExcuse parental issues?]]
** Depending on the version, this could show how much Freddie wants Florence back; he's even willing to let them drag him around for a shot at her. Besides, he switches camps later when he helps Anatoly to beat Vigand.

* Why did Richard Nelson turn Florence into such a wallflower?
** Surely a savvy, worldly character is more compelling than a thinly veiled DamselInDistress? Was he assuming ViewersAreMorons because "an (outwardly) self-confident woman like her wouldn't stand for that kind of crap"?
*** While this This Troper is on the subject, is Freddie meant to be a self-centred {{Jerkass}} or is he just downright emotionally abusive?
*** The Kennedy Center Production gives Freddy an AmbiguousDisorder that is meant to explain his self centeredness and paranoia. We see him taking medication to help him with this, and we hear his internal monologue where he berates his hot temper.
** This Troper thinks that depends on whether you want the show to be a mass of morally grey {{Jerkass}}es or black-and-white. Anatoly isn't exactly free of {{Jerkass}} traits either.

* What do the Embassy underlings mean when they tell Anatoly "Don't forget the guys who cut your keys."?
** "Cut your keys", as in "made your keys", as in let you into the country. They're the ones who do all the paperwork necessary for Anatoly defecting, and don't want this to go amiss.

* In ''The Deal (No Deal)'', Anatoly makes it perfectly clear that he isn't willing to intentionally lose the World Championship. So why, in ''Talking Chess'', is Freddie trying to convince him to win?
** There's two different ways I've heard that scene interpreted:
*** That Freddie is switching tactics and trying a new way to get Florence back. He's realized that Florence will never forgive Anatoly for choosing chess over her, and Freddie wants to facilitate that break-up (this also depends on how Florence is played when Walter tells her about her father; I've seen performances where she refuses to go along with him, and ones where she sinks, to the floor, beaten).
*** Or that Freddie is seriously sick of all the political machinations and drama surrounding the game. In act one, his posturing caused him to lose the match and lose Florence, and it rendered him little better than a puppet in act two. Freddie just wants to see the guy that beat him finally play some freaking chess.
** And in case the question was as to why Anatoly is losing when he so adamant about not throwing the match, the implication is that all the political stuff as well as the business of his marriage is doing its job and getting to him. After all, it's not until he makes up his mind to put everything else to one side (in spectacular fashion) and just focus on chess that the tide turns.

* Why is Freddie so offended by the reporters' implication that Florence is only his second because she's sleeping with him ("how come your second's a girl, lover boy?")? It seems like that would affect ''her'' reputation rather than his ({{Double Standard}}s being what they are), and he hardly seems empathetic enough to care about that. Yet he has a more severe reaction to that than to any of the other unkind (if fully deserved) things the reporters say to/about him.
** Maybe it's an implication that he's gay? Clearly he has issues about that topic from "Pity the Child".
** Anatoly suggests this to Florence in the ConceptAlbum during ''Quartet'' and she reacts defensively. Also, in the documentary that was made about the album while it was being recorded in Stockholm, Creator/TimRice seems to suggest that the relationship between Florence and Freddie was much more business-like than the form it's taken on in the various stage adaptations, so it doesn't seem too far-fetched to suggest that the initial plan was for Florence to be Freddie's [[TheBeard beard]]. If you take the view that his actions in the show are the result of Internalised Homophobia, it could be a nod to Bobby Fischer's notorious reputation for anti-Semitism despite his own Jewish background.

* A question out of curiosity: Regarding the ColorCodedForYourConvenience entry, what color did the Arbiter wear?
** In the ColorCodedForYourConvenience Royal Albert Hall concert, he wore a dark blue suit with a dark purple shirt and white gloves (so basically making him not really affiliated with either side). Most productions this troper has seen which uses colour-coding had him dressed in blue (again, to mark him as separate from everyone else).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There are plenty of variants where there isn't a "you must deal with a check/cannot move into check" rule, mostly high-speed variants where it's easier to make big mistakes and decisive punishment is a bigger part of the skillset. Without those considerations it's kind of just a formality because it's what 99.9% of players would do anyway, and on the fringes it stops embarrassing ends to casual games and helps beginners understand the idea of forcing movement.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
explain castling

Added DiffLines:

**** That's precisely what differentiates a castling move from a king move. A rook-castling move would be indistinguishable from a regular rook move. That the king-castling move is illegal as a king move makes it unambiguous.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the interest of being a spoilsport (and a giant geek), the "Pawn moves two spaces in their first move" was created for the sole reason to hasten the start of the game (since otherwice the game tended to be 1) e2-e3, e7-e6 2) e3-e4, e6-e5). It wasn't intended to give any strategical boost. It then took about five seconds for about five million chess players to figure out that the until-then strategy of putting a pawn at 4/5 file in order to stop the two pawns that could only move to the two squares that he was attacking from moving was side-stepped by them simply double-move to the side of the attacking piece. The En Passant rule was an ObviousRulePatch to eliminate this. [Cue GIJoe music].

to:

** In the interest of being a spoilsport (and a giant geek), the "Pawn moves two spaces in their first move" was created for the sole reason to hasten the start of the game (since otherwice the game tended to be 1) e2-e3, e7-e6 2) e3-e4, e6-e5). It wasn't intended to give any strategical boost. It then took about five seconds for about five million chess players to figure out that the until-then strategy of putting a pawn at 4/5 file in order to stop the two pawns that could only move to the two squares that he was attacking from moving was side-stepped by them simply double-move to the side of the attacking piece. The En Passant rule was an ObviousRulePatch to eliminate this. [Cue GIJoe WesternAnimation/GIJoeARealAmericanHero music].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** And in case the question was as to why Anatoly is losing when he so adamant about not throwing the match, the implication is that all the political stuff as well as the business of his marriage is doing its job and getting to him. After all, it's not until he makes up his mind to put everything else to one side (in spectacular fashion) and just focus on chess that the tide turns.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** You could redraft the rules so that it's considered a "both a King move and a Rook move", but then you'd have to complicate the touch-move rule to specify that in castling you have to touch the king first to keep play working the same way. So why bother? (Ancestrally, castling comes from older forms of chess where the king was allowed to make various forms of leap as its first move, and the most common approach was moving the rook on one move and leaping the king on the next. Castling consolidated the two moves to speed up the game, and offset that with reduction in flexibility as to where you could move the king.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In the ColorCodedForYourConvenience Royal Albert Hall concert, he wore a dark blue suit with a dark purple shirt and white gloves (so basically making him not really affiliated with either side). Most productions this troper has seen which uses colour-coding had him dressed in blue (again, to mark him as separate from everyone else).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** The Kennedy Center Production gives Freddy an AmbiguousDisorder that is meant to explain his self centeredness and paranoia. We see him taking medication to help him with this, and we hear his internal monologue where he berates his hot temper.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** It's not particularly frequent. The most frequent result in master level is resignation, at junior level it is checkmate (because juniors can't see six moves in advance). What makes the stalemate rule an improvement is that [[WeHaveReserves attrition]] isn't a sure path to victory the way it is in checkers. Attrition is useful but no matter how far ground down a player, the superior player still has to watch. It also makes for counterintuitive nuances. For instance, it is common to promote to rook rather then queen, simply to make sure the opponent's king will have more places to run to until you are finally ready.

to:

*** It's not particularly frequent. The most frequent result in master level is resignation, at junior level it is checkmate (because juniors can't see six moves in advance). What makes the stalemate rule an improvement is that [[WeHaveReserves attrition]] isn't a sure path to victory the way it is in checkers. Attrition is useful but no matter how far ground down a player, the superior player still has to watch. It also makes for counterintuitive nuances. For instance, it is common to promote to rook rather then queen, simply to make sure the opponent's king will have more places to run to until you are finally ready. ("Common" at the social level, maybe. Any competitive player would promote to Queen except in the vanishingly rare case that (i) doing so would ''necessarily'' stalemate and (ii) not promoting at all would be worse.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


* A question out of curiosity: Regarding the ColorCodedForYourConvenience entry, what color did the Arbiter wear?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Even {{Mafalda}} [[http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_MeK0jFXbWMg/SglMTe3ZtHI/AAAAAAAAAEY/-y5vLAvRXiw/s1600-h/mafalda+ajedrez+comunismo.gif realized]] it.

to:

*** Even {{Mafalda}} ComicStrip/{{Mafalda}} [[http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_MeK0jFXbWMg/SglMTe3ZtHI/AAAAAAAAAEY/-y5vLAvRXiw/s1600-h/mafalda+ajedrez+comunismo.gif realized]] it.

Top