On a design level, the Renaissance Armor is the next step from the Modular Armor.... if you ignore everything from issue 319 onwards through Heroes Reborn. This is what most fans and a lot of writers do anyway, as if that era never happened.
When Tony and JARVIS are designing the Mk II, what's that delicious looking muck Tony's downing? That's right, he's already experiencing palladium poisoning.
In a memorable Iron Man storyline, Tony's armor is infected with Ultron-tech and essentially becomes his abusive boyfriend: jealous, controlling, and obsessive. It even sacrifices itself to save his life. Thing is, Ultron-tech is derived from Ultron, a killer robot with a personality based on the brain waves of its creator, scientist Henry Pym (who happens to be Tony Stark's teammate on the Avengers). Taking this to the inevitable, horrifying conclusion, does this mean Hank Pym is secretly, obsessively in love with Tony Stark?
Ultron's personality is BASED on Hank Pym's brainwaves, and does not contain Hank's memories. Without those memories, there is no way to draw the conclusion that Hank is in love with Tony. However, Hank IS jealous, abusive, and generally obsessive, as well as petty. But similar to Hank, when the chips are down and it's truly important, the Ultron-Iron suit gave its life to save Tony, as Hank has demonstrated with Wasp in the past. In reality, this makes the Ultron-tech fridge horror, because of the fact that any machine could become a possessive and abusive figure in a person's life... imagine your computer, that holds ALL your porn and ALL your secrets. You haven't been paying enough attention to it, and now it's jealous. Guess what it'll do?
Maybe I am just dense, but the first couple times watching Iron Man I totally missed that the scientist telling Obadiah Stane "I'm not Tony Stark", is a callback to speech Obi gives when accepting the award for Tony at the beginning of the movie, and plays well with the film's final line "I am Iron Man."- Rothul
Something I only got the second time I saw it is the way the film manipulates the viewer's expectations to get your attention away from the real villain and the real plot. The people who kidnap Tony Stark appear at first to be your standard stereotypical Hollywood-issue Muslim extremists from Unspecifiedistan, and the scene where they record a video of Stark is deliberately set up to look like real-life hostage videos — but the kidnappers' dialogue is not subtitled, which allows the filmmakers to pull the wool over our eyes. In fact, they're not Muslim extremists at all. Their leader wants to conquer Asia, and even says as much, but the Al-Qaeda-like trappings of the camp where Stark is held were enough to make me assume that they were the throwaway first-act villains who wouldn't be seen again, just as they were in the comics continuity. When Pepper translates the video and we learn that they were actually working for Obadiah Stane all along... well, I for one thought that was a very well executed bait-and-switch. And if you look carefully, there's a bonus for comics fans: the organization is called the Ten Rings, aka the source of the Mandarin's power. -puritybrown
Just the line "I Am Iron Man" crams a lot of meaning into four words. Tony Stark spends the film discovering that he really doesn't like Tony Stark. The ending line is him taking real control and starting again. "I Am Iron Man" could just as easily mean "That Man Is Dead" (meaning the Tony Stark that used to be).
In the first Iron Man, while the Air Force convoy is driving along the road, they pass by an Afghan farmer with a goat. For the first twenty or so times I watched the movie, I just thought that was a harmless bit of scenery. Then I suddenly remembered: insurgents sometimes use otherwise innocuous farmers (or insurgents disguised as farmers) as spotters for ambushes on convoys! That was how the Ten Rings knew when precisely to hit Tony's convoy!
When Tony has Pepper overload the Arc Reactor in the factory, it shoots a huge beam of energy into the sky. Exactly the same thing that Tony does with his own, smaller Arc Reactor when he fires his "chest beam" at Stane earlier in the fight!
It's always nice to come across certain things on a second viewing. Tony's speech at the beginning about the Jericho missile makes mention of repulsor technology that allows the smaller missiles to spread out. One of the great scientific challenges is how to create thrust without a fuel source, and it seems they developed something that allows for a split second push with the largest battery they can fit. That is why the Arc Reactor tech is so valuable, with it Tony is able to fly with the repulsor tech and nearly all of his other offensive weaponry is either compact or reliant entirely on an energy source. —KJ Mackley
Another benefit to the repulsors? You see it in Tony's garage and in his fight against Rhodes—substantial thrust while generating little to no heat. Otherwise he'd have set everything on fire just in the testing phase alone.
At the end of the climactic battle at the end of the first one, Tony tells Pepper to blow the reactor through the roof and at Tony and Obadiah. I always thought it was lame that Tony would "miraculously" survive with the flicker of the chest reactor after it, but later it occurred to me that it could have been that Tony, being the arc reactor expert and general physics genius that he is, knew or calculated that he was light enough to be pushed out of the way and not take the brunt of the blast, while Obadiah was not. Pepper just thought that he would die, but he knew he wouldn't.
There's also the fact that his suit was made of gold-titanium alloy, whereas Stane's suit was presumably ferrous metals. Hence why he mostly got hit by concussive force, whereas Stane suffered induced electrocution from his magnetic armor material.
May overlap with Fridge Horror: at the end of Iron Man, Tony Stark kills Obadiah Stane. Stane was more than a business associate to Tony, he was clearly a good friend who may have overlapped with father figure considering their age differences. And Stane not only betrayed Tony and tried to kill him several times, but also played the part of Tony's friend long before the attempted murder in Afghanistan while stabbing him in the back. No wonder Stark's so messed up in Iron Man 2, besides the whole dying of palladium poisoning bit!
End of the first film, when the Arc Reactor blows, it fires a huge beam of energy up into the air, frying Stane. Now think, where else in the Avengers film universe have we seen something like that? Oh yeah, every time a wormhole is created in Thor and Captain America.
The ARC reactor which is evidently based on the Tesseract, an Asgardian artifact from Captain America, from the home of Thor.
Wait a minute... if the theories about what happened to Schmidt at the end of Captain America are true and he was just transported to a different dimension by the Tesseract, is it possible that the arc reactor did the same thing and Stane is still alive somewhere? After all, they Never Found the Body...
Well, the beam fired up just knocked out the Iron Monger suit and (possibly) killed Stane. He then fell with the suit into the blown reactor.
Stane didn't go anywhere. The arc reactor, while being based on Howard Stark's Tesseract research, wasn't a perfected "model" by any means. It could generate a massive amount of electricity, but it doesn't generate portals and isn't imbued with extragalactic energy.
I laughed along with everyone else when I went to see Iron Man 2 and it got to the gag with the much-hyped "Exwife" missile failing horribly. But it wasn't until I was walking out of the theater that I really cracked up: I'd just realized they were making fun of the first movie's Chekhov's Armoury.—Phoenix Fire
Further, Tony is adamant on his stance that the government can't have his Iron Man suit, as well as refusing to let Stane study his miniaturized reactor in the first film. This is because, as the son of the man who studied HYDRA's weapons, he'd likely know exactly the sort of damage weapons derived from the Arc Reactor tech could do.
Here's where things get Meta: Tony Stark's primary mission for the Iron Man armor, as stated in the first film, was to keep his weapons tech out of enemy hands, ESPECIALLY the weapons tech ripped from his own Iron Man armor designs. The above point ensures that each new film in the Iron Man franchise will have an opening for a sequel.
It's a running joke in the first film that Coulson tells Pepper and Tony he's from the "Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division", and when they crack that the place needs a new name, Coulson replies "we're working on it". He's not telling them he's working for SHIELD because it's yet unknown if they can be trusted and they don't know if what happened to Tony is important enough for them to bring him in on it. Using the full name instead of the shorthand acronym is likely so they don't remember it all and will be unlikely to find info on SHIELD if they ask around, and if they have heard of SHIELD using the full name protects Coulson's identity as one of their agents. In essence, Coulson using the full name is the organization is another layer of secrecy.
Fridge Brilliance from the first movie: The head baddie repeats more than once that military success depends on having the most advanced weapons, and to support his point, declares that Genghis Khan took over Asia because bows and arrows were then the most advanced weapons. The brilliance? He's dead wrong. When Genghis Khan conquered Asia, most of his enemies had bows and arrows, as well as comparably advanced weapons. They also had horses. Genghis' advantage lay in the fact that his tribesmen had perfected the art of shooting from horseback, which allowed his armies to travel quickly and carry out lightning attacks at great speed. Other peoples never learned how to do this, and were almost defenceless against the Mongol armies. History's lesson: It's not the advanced weapons that matter, it's the people who wield them- something the terrorists can't understand. -Kivutar
however, the horseback riders did use compound bows rather than normal ones; it gives them better range, something that was only acheived by long bows that were too big to work on horseback, so it's both.
Whilst watching the first film again, something struck me about when Obadiah asks Tony about the Arc Reactor in his chest. Tony asks him whether it was Pepper or Rhodes who told him, and Obadiah doesn't actually answer. Considering that Obadiah must've had ways of contacting the Ten Rings, it seems rather plausible that he could have learnt about Tony's Arc Reactor from them (albit in a vague way, like "yeah, the hostage now has a glowing thing in his chest - does this mean anything to you?")
I thought the filmmakers had once again invoked Artistic License - Physics by having Iron Man fly with his hand and feet repulsors both pointing behind him, since in real life he would just start falling unless at least one repulsor was pointed down. But in fact, he does: the glowing chest piece is also a repulsor, that's why he can also shoot beams out of it.
The Mark V armor is obviously a clear reference to the Silver Centurion armor from the comics. What isn't so obvious is that the reason it's silver/chrome instead of gold is because as a simple emergency self-defense suit it doesn't need high altitude flight capabilities, meaning Tony doesn't have to use the gold-titanium alloy used on the main suits.
From the first film: Christine Everhart calls Tony "the merchant of death", a nickname also given to Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite. Alfred Nobel supposedly heard of this nickname when a false report of his death made it to the obituaries. That's what inspired him to set of the Nobel Peace Prize: he wanted to set up a new legacy. What does Tony do when he gets back from Afghanistan? Shut down weapons manufacturing immediately and then build a suit to protect the people his technology was harming in the first place! Talk about leaving a better legacy!
In the third film, War Machine has suited up his armour Iron Patriot-style. Why would a serious guy like Rhodey do this? Because now the public knows that the World War 2 hero with a flag on his chest is back, and it's great PR for the military to have their superhero dressed similarly.
At the end of the first film, Tony refuses to lie and tell a false cover story that is not only standard operating procedure for super heroes but would protect his secret from the government and others with whom he doesn't want to share the secrets of the suit, making it impossible for the government to pressure him to surrender the technology as they do in the sequel. Why would Tony not take such a common, harmless, logical precaution to protect his private property and his freedom to use as he sees fit unhindered? Because as Cracked.com and numerous others have pointed out, the films' Tony Stark is the embodiment of the values of a philosophy that adamantly condemns (among other things) lying, or "faking reality in any way whatsoever."
Tony's perceptions of his late father. In the first movie, he returns from the caves and starts the press conference saying he never got to say goodbye to his father. He goes on to wonder if Howard Stark had ever had any doubts and insecurites, or if he was "every inch the man we all remember from the newsreels" before getting to the point. Cue the second movie where a dying Tony gets his answer, in the last few seconds his dad recorded on that projector reel: "My greatest creation was, and will always be, you."
Why would they test the Jericho missile in an active war zone as opposed to say...Nevada?
They weren't testing it. They were demonstrating it.
How can Tony end the weapons contract with the government one-sided? Wouldn't such a contract be obligatory?
Either the contract was up and he chose not to renew/renegotiate it or he unilaterally backed out and figured dealing with the breach of contract suit was worth it.
Are we talking about the film or the comic? In the film, Tony is a terribly irresponsible executive, as we see everyone around him racing to do his job while he skirts around. He simply declared, "We're not making weapons anymore," then left everyone else in the company holding the bag, particularly Obadiah Stane, who was able to use this as an opportunity to file an injunction against him. Under Stane's leadership, Stark Industries was still making weapons, as is evidenced by the presence of a Jericho in Golmera shortly after the injunction was files. Tony Stark thinks he can make a bold declaration and the entire world will fall in line, because lovable though he may be, he's still an egomaniac.
When Pepper listens to the translated recording from when Tony was in captivity, we hear the terrorists refer to Obadiah Stane by name, with Tony conscious and in the room. Wouldn't Stane's name be spoken in English, in which case, wouldn't Tony be able to hear it and pick it out?
Given the condition he's in at the time, no, he probably wouldn't be able to hear it and pick it out. He's barely conscious, struggling against the light, and has a ton of shrapnel digging its way through his body towards his heart. It's doubtful he remembers anything he saw or heard during that.
Assuming Tony did hear it, Stane is the VP of Stark Industries. There's plenty of reasons the terrorists might address him.
Why Japan for the first mass-production Arc Reactor? They have cause to be concerned about meeting their power needs, given recent events.
Fridge Horror - Remember how in the Grand Finale, Mandarin created an anti-technology fog that effectively shut down New York City and Hong Kong, including life support (Tony and M.O.D.O.K.), air traffic (Force Work's jet, a helicopter, and the jetboots for the armors), the armors, and that we saw looting and a fire started (started from the helicopter crash)? Keeping this in mind, that means other planes that was in the air crashed, people are in hospitals on life support and/or in dire need of medical care probably died, and emergency services were likely impeded. The Mandarin was probably responsible for the deaths of hundreds—if not thousands—of people.
Hundreds, if not thousands? Try hundreds OF thousands, if not millions. Think about all of those with pacemakers, electronic respirators at home and in hospitals, etc, etc....