History DethroningMoment / WebOriginal

** emilethetemplar: I feel like I have to bring and old Crowbcat video. It was a clip of a behind-the-scenes of ''VideoGame/Halo5Guardians'' where two developers from 343 industrie explain how bullet magnetism work with the implication that you don't need to aim because the game does it for you. Here's the thing, bullet magnetism is a common thing in console shooters. It's purpose is to compensate for the joystick iimprecision. It make it so you won't miss your target because you were visually on it but a few pixels too far. Also, do you know what was the game that invented bullet magnetism? A little game from the early 2000's by the name of ''VideoGame/HaloCombatEvolved''. Yeah, no wonder he deleted it.

** emilethetemplar: I feel like I have to bring and old Crowbcat video. It was a clip of a behind-the-scenes of ''VideoGame/Halo5Guardians'' where two developers from 343 industrie explain how bullet magnetism work with the implication that you don't need to aim because the game does it for you. Here's the thing, bullet magnetism is a common thing in console shooters. It's purpose is to compensate for the joystick imprecesions. It make it so you won't miss your target because you were visually on it but a few pixels too far. Also, do you know what was the game that invented bullet magnetism? A little game from the early 2000's by the name of ''VideoGame/HaloCombatEvolved''. Yeah, no wonder he deleted it.

* JEFFWONTLEAVE: I personally think that commentary videos get a bad rep nowadays. They have drastically improved from what they were back in 2011 with much more insight and humor. One prime example of this is Rae Mills, considered by many to be the best one out there. Which makes her DMOS, [[https://youtu.be/NcmurG7bnHc&ab_channel=BunchOfPseudoIntellectuals Response to Mr Enter]] even more painful. The video itself [[{{They Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot}} could have been better]] if it was worked into a main commentary on her channel or People who did the B.O.P commentary on Mr.Enter's troll video did the response, but instead it's just a lazy response that come's across as filler for a {{Massive Multiplayer Crossover}} channel. But the main issue I had with this video that turned it {{From Bad to Worse}} was the last 3 minutes where she tries to come across as {{The Last DJ}} [[{{Anvilicious}} who is trying to help save the poor misinformed fans of this horrible person who made a video she hated on youtube]] instead turned the entire response to a very mean-spirited, arrogant and completely uncalled for rant about Mr.enter. For someone who is well known for being very well reasonable and yet still blunt and to the point, this seemed completely out of character for her and added nothing of value to the commentary. As a person who hated that troll video as much as, if not more so then her, I was completely furious with this video and was considering just giving up on the commentary community all over again, but I decided to give her one more shot and she did win me back. But I'm still not forgiving her for that train wreck any time soon.

** emilethetemplar: I feel like I have to bring and old Crowbcat video. It was a clip of a behind-the-scenes of ''VideoGame/Halo5Guardians'' where two devellopers from 343 industrie explain how bullet magnetism work with the implication that you don't need to aim because the game does it for you. Here's the thing, bullet magnetism is a common thing in console shooters. It's purpose is to compensate for the joystick imprecesions. It make it so you won't miss your target because you were visually on it but a few pixels too far. Also, do you know what was the game that invented bullet magnetism? A little game from the early 2000's by the name of ''VideoGame/HaloCombatEvolved''. Yeah, no wonder he deleted it.

** emilethetemplar: I feel like I have to bring and old Crowbcat video. It was a clip of a behind-the-scenes of ''VideoGame/Halo5Guardians'' where two devellopers from 343 industrie explain how bullet magnetism work with the implication that you don't need to aim because the game does it for you. Here's the thing, bullet magnetism is a common thing in console shooters. It's purpose is to compensate for the joystick imprecesions. It make it so you won't miss your target because you were visually on it but a few pixels too far. Also, do you know what was the game that invented bullet magnetism? A little game from the early 2000's by the name of ''VideoGame/HaloCombatEvolved''. Yeah, no wonder he deleted it.

** emilethetemplar: I feel like I have to bring and old Crowbcat video. It was a clip of a behind-the-scenes of ''VideoGame/Halo5Guardians'' where two devellopers from 343 industrie explain how bullet magnetism work with the implication that the game aims for you. Here's the thing, bullet magnetism is a common thing in console shooters. It's purpose is to compensate for the joystick being inherently less accurate than a mouse so you won't miss your target because you were visually on it but two pixels too far. Also, do you know what was the game that invented bullet magnetism? A little game from the early 2000's call ''VideoGame/HaloCombatEvolved''. Yeah, no wonder he deleted it.

* AnsemPaul: They were always known to be a trouble maker, a bully, a hypocrite and an absolute blight on any fandom they participated in, but findng out they raped their kid sister and wrote a fanfic about is fucking sickening, as is the thought people woul dcontinue to support a child rapist because they find them mildly entertaining https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhYKbaI5-RA . Further fridge horror, of all the sexual encounters they had, the only one they wrote a fanfic of was the one where they raped their sister?! I feel like hurling

* Troper/MelancholyUtopia: I really like Lockstin, at least when compared to [[WebVideo/GameTheory another theory channel whose moniker shall remain unspoken.]] As a huge fan of Pokémon, I find his analyses about the games' cultural lore very interesting and often he has evidence to back it all up. However, his video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTpck-meq2c "Why Pangoro may be the WORST Pokémon!"]] was definitely his lowest point and forced me to rinse the bitter aftertaste with salt water. I have no issue at all with him disliking Pangoro; I personally am neutral to it, and there are way more Pokemon I like or feel neutral towards than outright hate (the rare exception being [[GoddamnedBats Emolga]], that flying electric shit stain). But the majority of the video is just him ranting about how much he hates pandas. Well, ok, but what does this have to do with Pangoro? Is the biology behind pandas the inspiration for the programming of its design/stats/type/anything? Is Pangoro terrible to battle with? Guess what, he doesn't address this even once in the video. He simply hates it because it's based off of pandas and he hates pandas. With that logic, shouldn't you hate [[WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda Po]] too because he happens to be a panda, even though the content of his character is likable? He did a similar video about why he hates Komala because it's a koala based Pokémon (an animal which he also hates), but at least there he had more understandable reasons for disliking the Pokémon itself and not just for its origin, and he offers some insightful thoughts about its existence. But his Pangoro video left a lot to be desired; I didn't gain any valuable input at all from it, other than I know he hates pandas now. Which is not what I sought for when I clicked this video; if I did, I would've just put "Why pandas suck" in the search bar. Lockstin, come on, I know you can make much better content than this, don't settle for less.

* Skapokon: Not many tropers will know this as this is a Spanish show, but Rareza Jugable (Playable Rarity) was my favourite Platform/YouTube Show for a long time and it inspired me to create my own videos. However, the show had gone through a SeasonalRot so big that not even WesternAnimation/TheFairlyOddParents can be compared to after his "Review" of The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker. Though, that's not my DMOS, his theory video "Super Mario Who" is. Basically, he tries to compare Super Mario Bros. with Dr. Who, even though the comparisons between the two are minor references that have nothing to do with what the theory is about (these being how the castles in SMB3 are smaller than Mario... on the minimap and a pointless comparison between the angel statues and the Boos). The theory instead focuses on trying to force the old "X is in Coma and everything is a dream" to the Mario universe, but only to certain games, which are the Spin Offs, Super Mario Bros. 2 and Super Mario Land, for some reason, and explains how everyone except for basically the Mario Brothers, Peach, Bowser and the generic minions are just interpretations of Mario's Mind. Daisy represents how Mario misses Pauline, Pauline represents exactly the same, Wario represents Mario's Evil Side and Baby Mario represents his innocence. Not only he's saying that half of the Mario universe is just a dream for no reason, not only he calls series like Wario Land and Yoshi's Island "Filler", not only he forgets entirely about Donkey Kong Country and Super Mario 64 DS (a "canon" game where Wario is playable), but for some reason he also managed to make us think that the dumb cartoons and the Live-Action movie are part of the real deal even if they were made without Miyamoto or anyone from Nintendo, really. Basically, this theory was the just an overall lame TakeThat to the Mario games he doesn't like, another way to shoo-in his obsession over Dr. Who and the final nail in Rareza Jugable's coffin.

** Tropers/ExplodingCreeper14 I want to see links of what you said. I believe you, but I wanna see what exactly they said. I'm curious.

* ''Tropers/Siegfried1337'': While I still respect [=KonekoKitten=] for his commentary videos on ''VideoGame/{{Roblox}}'', one moment that almost pushed me to my RageBreakingPoint was that when he posted a video about "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j6Buy2ngB0 the truth about roblox bans...]]". In the video, Koneko talks about how some Roblox bans were absolutely justified since they were actually doing shady stuff and used Inspect Element to cover up the truth about some of their bans. That part gave me an absolute headache since I have seen most bans on Roblox be legitimate (and in case what you are wondering, yes, I have done my research on their accounts), so it really stood out that Koneko would say such a thing. Given how unpopular Roblox moderation is, and the fact that getting mistakenly banned is tragically common, and this basically nearly made him a massive BrokenPedestal to me, since this is a complete 180 from his well thought-out his videos were, seeing him do that made me less likely to continue supporting him if he continously holds this view. Trust me, when people do hot takes, at least most of them know how to get proof on how to make a good hot take, but this is not one of them.

* Rondomi: Tipping a SacredCow here. ''LetsPlay/{{Chuggaaconroy}}'' is a good Let's player in my opinion, but from a critical perspective, when one takes into account what a Let's Play is, his Okami finale was horrible. I understand the prospect of silence during serious and/or awesome moments, but, with the exception of a subjectively narmy line, he was silent during the final phase of the final boss, ergo gameplay. No opinions on the design, no tips on how to beat him, just emptyness. The nail in the coffin, however, is that when one goes to Website/YouTube and types in "Okami Final Boss and Ending", they are likely to get virtually the exact same video: a man recording footage of said final boss and ending and nothing more. For what is considered by many to be the definitive Let's Player, this kind of crap should not be the kind he can get away with.

* jmac9345: Before I get any flack for this, let me get out that I love WebVideo/JonTron. He’s one of the greatest and funniest Website/YouTube critics of all time. And although I don’t think he’s had a bad episode per say, he isn’t free from bad moments. For example, I loved both of his Food Games videos as a great, long awaited return to form after [=StarCade=] (which was [[SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome awesome]] and [[SugarWiki/FunnyMoments hilarious]] in it’s own right) especially with gems like the [[NotMakingThisUpDisclaimer live horse in his apartment]] and [[spoiler:[[BigLippedAlligatorMoment Grimbo]]]], but there was one aspect of Part 1 that annoyed me. With the Yoshinoya, Global Gladiators, [=McDonald’s Treasure Land Adventure=], and Donald Magical World (especially the former and latter) segments, he barely touched on the games, gameplay wise. Granted, Jon does tend to focus more on comedy rather than actual reviewing, but I feel that he could’ve went a bit more in depth with the games instead of just briefly skimming over them, making a joke, and moving on. It didn’t taint the video for me, I just wish there was a bit more depth to it.

* JetpackPercy: I saw a few reviews from this text-based web reviewer on Website/DeviantART, called Media Man, and one part was just so cruel, and so infuriating, I vowed not to watch him? What was it? Well, it was his "Top 10 Worst Simpsons Episode List", specifically, his entry for "Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because he bashed an episode, a character, or the series as a whole. It was the entry where he says that Bart deserved the abuse, and "it makes this episode worth watching", claiming because that Bart was an ass in other episodes, he deserved to be [[SarcasmMode rightfully]] bullied in this episode. As indicated by the [[DethroningMoment/TheSimpsons DMOS page]] for ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', Bart was constantly bullied by the entire town, including encouragement to commit suicide near the end. All he did wrong in the episode was miss a fly ball. He didn't deserved to be bullied, no matter what Media Man says. He also says that the town [[Heartwarming/TheSimpsons helping Bart to regain his confidence,]] and not lock the entire city of Springfield into irredeemable territory, was selfish, mean-spirited and cruel to the other team (What, [[SarcasmMode are they going to commit suicide for making a child you don't like feel better]]), and that Marge was in the wrong for chewing out the town. Well, if he thinks that 10-year-olds he doesn't like should be [[SarcasmMode "rightfully"]] tortured to the point of committing suicide for screwing up only once, then consider me out for watching him in the foreseen future.

* Drbazooka: Normally I like ''Planet Dolan''. I find his top lists to be among the better lists on Website/YouTube. Except in one instance during his ''Top Ten worst video game cliches'' list. Now the list itself was mostly fine although it did contain many cliches not exclusive to gaming, but my [=DMoS=] comes not from the video itself, but the thumbnail. The thumbnail contained an image of Chica the Chicken from ''Franchise/FiveNightsAtFreddys'' with white bold text saying "Jumpscares!" Not only was Fnaf not mentioned at all in the video, but jumpscares weren't either. Worse still this caused a flame war in the comments section and made the video feel like click bait to me. I felt conned after watching and it has somewhat soured my opinion of him, at least big [=LPers=] who are often accused of click bait actually show what's in the title of the video!

* Tropers/{{supernintendo128}}: [=ProtoMario=] is a Website/YouTube commentator who talks about current events in gaming and for a while I was a fan of him until I saw [[https://youtu.be/9JmR31KChI0 this]] rant of the Nintendo 2015 Digital Event where he reached [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Mysterious Mr. Enter]] levels of rage, only even more irrational. The video is full of Critical Research Failure (like not understanding why there are Muppet skits in between the announcements when the biggest announcement in the event is ''Star Fox Zero'', a new game in a series inspired by ''Series/{{Thunderbirds}}'' a british puppet TV show) and expecting too much out of the company (complaining about the fact that no new ''Donkey Kong Country'' or ''Kirby'' games were announced when ''Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze'' came out a year ago and ''Kirby and the Rainbow Curse'' came out a mere 5 months ago) but the stupidest part of the entire video is when he acts like ''Star Fox Zero'' was the only game announced for the Wii U, nevermind that like 6 other games are coming out for it soon, and claims that Wii U owners have nothing to play this year due to the apparent lack of new games announced, while treating replaying older games for the system as a bad thing and uses the tired "Wii U has no games" argument, when at this point, there are plenty of games for the system. The reason behind these stupid accusions is that he admits that he did not watch the entire Digial Event before making this video, only seeing bits and pieces of it. One of the biggest mistakes a commentator can make is see bits and pieces of the thing they are commentating on and assume that they know what they are talking about. After this video, I unsubscribed to him and never looked back.

* SamMax: Are Website/DeviantArt text based examples allowed? If so, I'd like to nominate [[http://professormegaman.deviantart.com/art/Subscription-Canceller-363425340 this abomination of a complaint]]. Basically, it's him complaining about the ''ComicBook/MegaManArchieComics'' comics, and doing a terrible job at it. Now, I can accept opinions different from mine... as long as they are at least factually correct. He complains about it being similar to Archie's ''[[ComicBook/SonictheHedgehogArchieComics Sonic]]''. There are similarities in there, true, but the differences outweigh the similarities, but one can see the similarities, so it's not the worst. However, he seems to think that the {{Original Character}}s in the comic steal focus away from the game characters. Now, it's true that there are stories that have focus on the {{Original Character}}s, but the game characters get a lot of focus as well. In fact, the stories with the game characters as the main focus outweigh the stories that focus on the {{Original Character}}s. Plus, he claims blatant disregard for the source material. If he bothered to read the comic like he claimed to have, he'd find that the comic is, for the most part, actually pretty faithful to the games. Sure, not 100% so, but still. Not to mention that he seems to think anyone who likes the comics are idiots. I never heard of this fellow before this, but let's just say that he lost a potential watcher.

* Tropers/CoCage: I would like to present ''Review Tech USA’s'' response to ''If You're Over 30 And You Still Love Nintendo, You're Weird''. Basically, the "controversy" is about a Website/YouTube user named Yoshiller at E3, whom was interviewed by a news crew. The big deal was that he wore a Yoshi hat while interviewed, and other gamers grew a big fuss that he was invoking a bad stereotype. The problem is Rich goes on this rant about projecting stereotypes and being exclusive is wrong, [[{{Hypocrite}} while going on to call Yoshiller man-child and singled him out based on exaggerated rumors and speculations]]. Okay Rich, screw you on this, because you don’t know dick about the guy. I saw the guy’s E3 videos, and he looked and acted fine; perfectly composed. He was just doing his thing and showing support for a company he likes. He never acted like a jerk or an immature brat. [[DoubleStandard So let me get this straight: gamers can’t wear or show any support to a video game/video game company they love publicly, but it’s okay for people who like TV shows or movies to do the same.]] [[SarcasmMode Congratulations dumb-ass]], [[HeWhoFightsMonsters you now just became the thing you hated]] and jumped on the bandwagon like most news sites. Also, Yoshiller responded in the comments section of the video, and makes a comment not meaning to offend anyone and says that he [[Yoshiller]] still supports his own actions, and rightfully calls out on Rich and others for being ousted. What’s worse is that Rich never responds back nor apologizes about his big research failure (which he usually does when wrong or mistaken). I never agreed with everything Rich said, but I at least respected him, and gave his views food for thought. After an incident like this, I can say he lost a subscriber.

* fluffything: I enjoy watching [=LPs=] on [[WebVideo/PeanutButterGamer PBG Gaming]] on Website/YouTube. Not all of them are gems, but they're still enjoyable. That is, until "Part 32" of his [[SelfImposedChallenge Nuzlocke Challenge]] for ''[[VideoGame/PokemonRubyAndSapphire Pokémon Alpha Sapphire]]''. Good lord, what a train wreck. For one thing, he spends several minutes of the video consistently pointing out how he needs to level up his Pokemon to fight Kyogre (Which, I might add, he constantly mispronounces as "Kee-Oh-Gray" instead of "Kai-Oh-Gur") only to jump cut to his Pokemon already leveled up. I know it's boring to watch people level grind in video games. But, then, why make such a big deal about having to level up if there's just going to be a jump cut anyway? All it does is waste the viewer's time.

* batmany: On Website/YouTube, there's a three-part animated "series" (in the loosest sense of the word possible) titled "[[VideoGame/FiveNightsAtFreddys Freddy's Lament]]" by Skylegend Animation. As one probably guessed already, it's a series of FNAF fan animations. Actually, that's not an accurate description as I found out to my utter disappointment. The videos have almost nothing to do with FNAF save for characters making what can best be described as cameo appearances. Many of them have no reason to appear other than to pander to the fanbase. And, to make matters worse, much of their appearances don't make any sense. A good example is that Springtrap makes a cameo in one video even though the whole thing is supposed to take place around 1987 (the year FNAF 2 takes place). And, while the animation is stunning (with admittedly very-creepy imagery), it does nothing to excuse the nearly incoherent plot. What is the plot of the videos? Well, from what little I could decipher out of the TrueArtIsIncomprehensible mess, it's the origin story of The Puppet. And, oh, boy, does it get to painful levels of pretentiousness. This videos' take on The Puppet's origin? [[spoiler:Some random unpopular pre-teen girl is tricked into going to a party at Freddy Fazbear's, is teased because she has a crush on some guy, runs away crying, and is murdered... I guess?]] The plot never reveals exactly how this results in The Puppet's birth (so to speak). Either way, it's so blatant and utterly forced that it pretty much smears its proverbial feces over the subtlety of Scott Cawthon's work. Had this been some generic horror cartoon, I may've forgiven it for it's incoherent and pretentious plot. However, the fact that Skylegend Animation had the gall to drag FNAF into something this poorly done (Again, save for the animation and creepiness), causes it to go from simply forgettable to plain awful.
* Trialman: As much as I enjoy the Pokemon Alpha Sapphire Extreme Randomizer Nuzlocke by [=TyranitarTube=], I cannot defend his dismissive nature over the death of Enel the Galvantula when fighting ???'s Giratina in episode 34. At first, it begins the usual ReallyDeadMontage, but not even 5 seconds in, he cuts it off by showing a Website/YouTube comment saying "Fuck Enel!" It comes off as incredibly mean-spirited, just to give one problem, but it's even worse considering how long he deliberated over who to take with him, meaning that all that time making the decision now felt pointless. It's even worse, considering that this is the Elite Four, as in he can't just pull out another one of the Pokemon he caught, which means that this death should have a bigger impact, especially as it was the first Elite Four death, but no, apparently, this death is just a cheap joke. This whole thing gave me doubts about [[MemeticMutation believing in the Peeko]].

* Skapokon: Not many tropers will know this as this is a Spanish show, but Rareza Jugable (Playable Rarity) was my favourite Website/YouTube Show for a long time and it inspired me to create my own videos. However, the show had gone through a SeasonalRot so big that not even WesternAnimation/TheFairlyOddParents can be compared to after his "Review" of The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker. Though, that's not my DMOS, his theory video "Super Mario Who" is. Basically, he tries to compare Super Mario Bros. with Dr. Who, even though the comparisons between the two are minor references that have nothing to do with what the theory is about (these being how the castles in SMB3 are smaller than Mario... on the minimap and a pointless comparison between the angel statues and the Boos). The theory instead focuses on trying to force the old "X is in Coma and everything is a dream" to the Mario universe, but only to certain games, which are the Spin Offs, Super Mario Bros. 2 and Super Mario Land, for some reason, and explains how everyone except for basically the Mario Brothers, Peach, Bowser and the generic minions are just interpretations of Mario's Mind. Daisy represents how Mario misses Pauline, Pauline represents exactly the same, Wario represents Mario's Evil Side and Baby Mario represents his innocence. Not only he's saying that half of the Mario universe is just a dream for no reason, not only he calls series like Wario Land and Yoshi's Island "Filler", not only he forgets entirely about Donkey Kong Country and Super Mario 64 DS (a "canon" game where Wario is playable), but for some reason he also managed to make us think that the dumb cartoons and the Live-Action movie are part of the real deal even if they were made without Miyamoto or anyone from Nintendo, really. Basically, this theory was the just an overall lame TakeThat to the Mario games he doesn't like, another way to shoo-in his obsession over Dr. Who and the final nail in Rareza Jugable's coffin.

* Lolface123: Webvideo/GameChap was one of the best Website/YouTube channels I had set my eyes upon. I enjoyed their videos thoroughly, their YeOldeButcheredeEnglishe and funny antics managing to make me crack a smile through even a hard day. However, that all changed when the clickbait began rolling in. At first I thought it was nothing and that it was simply nothing more than a phase, if you could call it that. But it kept persisting, over and over and over. And then when I found out about their activities as [[ScrewTheRulesIMakeThem head moderator]] [[TheCaligula on their own forums]], up to and including banning people for no reason whatsoever and both disrespecting and downgrading them, for what seemed to me purely in the name of ego, I was [[TranquilFury livid]]. For I had a small-time hobby in literature on the side, but despite that I made people welcome, appreciated, respected, regardless of who they were. And then I [[BerserkButton see the direct inverse of what is happening.]] All in the sake of some vicious egotist who [[StupidEvil doesn't even give off the pretension that he cares about it afterwards, even when the consequences could mean the end for his channel.]] I quickly withdrew my contribution of the subscriber count in disgust. I still visit his profile occasionally, hoping that he decides to once again engage in malicious stupidity so that someone with more sway over Website/YouTube clips his wings for good.

* {{Tropers/PutYaGunsOn}}: I used to watch this Website/YouTube user called FadedHolySoldier AKA Mr. Advice circa 2007-2008. He was a nice guy with a cynical side, and he agreed with a lot of things that my angry, bullied 13-year-old self would've been on board with. He loved anime and fighting games, he hated 2007-era rap music, and he made videos speaking out against bullying, school issues, and stupid middle school and high school kids. He made cool trips to Japan where he would be friendly to random people on the street. He used to speak highly of women, even praising characters like [[VideoGame/StreetFighterII Chun-Li]] for making room for [[ActionGirl badass female characters]] in video games. Sure, his videos were highly profanity-laced, cynical, and had some controversial un-PC humor, but most if not all of them had good messages and good intentions. I came back to him around 2011, and hoooo boy was I in for a rude awakening. His new videos have now taken a misogynistic, racist direction. Around the time, he made videos calling out a controversial Singaporean Website/YouTube user named Aaron Tan. Of course, he starts one video playing [[VideoGame/StreetFighterII Chun-Li's theme song]] while doing ChopSockey moves with FunnyBruceLeeNoises. The rest of the video is littered with bad AsianSpeekeeEngrish impersonations, disgusting YellowFever comments about Singaporean women, and at the end of the video he resorted to referring to Aaron Tan as "Aaron Ching Tang Chong Chang Chong Chingchongchingchongchingchong Lolololololol [[HollywoodCuisine General Tso Chinese Food]] [[OverlyLongGag Chingchongchingchongchingchong Choioioioing]] [[OddNameOut Hot Sauce]]" or something along those lines (not even exaggerating that). His videos about women circa that era seem to imply that he is bitter towards most women now. He refers to his former nice self as a "mangina" and encourages men to treat women as little more than holes to put their dicks in, while being particularly hateful towards single moms. Needless to say, I lost respect for him since then, but I wish him the best, because I have seen him do better.

* {{Tropers/heartauthor}}: I like watching song countdowns by music reviewers, and in the past, that would sometimes include Mr. 96's lists. Sure, there were some opinions of his I didn't agree with, but that's par for the course with any music reviewer's videos. And then I saw his "Top 10 Worst Hit Songs of 2004" list, and...[[ThisIsGonnaSuck oh, boy]]. Specifically, it was his entry for number 3 on his list: "One Thing" by Finger Eleven. He only briefly talks about the song itself, before getting to the real reason he put it on the list: it's the song that {{Wrestling/WWE}} used in their tribute for {{Wrestling/Chris Benoit}}. {{Wrestling/Chris Benoit}}, of course, is now better known for having [[OvershadowedByControversy died in a murder-suicide]] that also resulted in the death of [[PaterFamilicide his wife and young son]]. Okay, fair enough; that association might make some people uncomfortable, and Mr. 96 even admits that {{Wrestling/WWE}} didn't initially know what happened at the time they made the tribute. But right after he says that, he angrily retorts "Then why are there still comments that say "R.I.P. Chris Benoit" on the song's {{Website/YouTube}} video?!" Are...are you serious? Well, how about that not only was Benoit seemingly [[DespairEventHorizon unable to deal]] with the loss of [[Wrestling/EddieGuerrero his best friend]], but autopsies revealed that Benoit's brain was comparable to that of an 80-year-old with Alzheimer's due to the [[BodyHorror constant head injuries]] he sustained throughout his career; facts that most wrestling fans have knowledge of? And furthermore, no matter what medium, there will always be a chance that someone you admire for their accomplishments turns out to be a [[BitchInSheepsClothing terrible human being]]; however, it's still possible to be inspired by them while also acknowleding their negative traits. The way Mr. 96 handled this segment made it seem like he did absolutely no research about the incident beyond the most basic details, which comes off as incredibly unprofessional. Not only is Mr. 96 not being fair to those people who did comment "R.I.P. Chris Benoit" (but could still presumbably [[FreudianExcuseIsNoExcuse not condone what he actually did]]), but by making it solely about this incident, he's not being fair to Finger Eleven, who simply had the unfortunate luck of their song becoming associated with a very tragic situation for everyone involed.

** Tropers/SavageSamurai: I agree but for slightly different reasons. [[spoiler: The main problem is that it's a gigantic advertisement for RWBY. If you're watching the Website/YouTube release, there is even an ad for RWBY Volume 6. However, anyone who's read the description notes that it's a battle between two scythe wielders. Ragna uses his scythe two times and it isn't even apparent that he's used it. I had to actually pause the video several times to even realise he'd used it. Now I don't care that it was biased; to an extent every DBX is biased because the victor is usually determined by the animator anyway. I don't care that it was an ad by Creator/RoosterTeeth. OK that's a lie, I do care but it doesn't mean much in the long run so I can forgive it. I mean if you have the means to promote it, then by all means promote it. However, the thing that gets me is that there was a much better person they could've used to fight Ragna, promote the show and and actually make the fight more interesting and make sense; Qrow Branwen. His Semblance is [[WindsOfDestinyChange inflicting bad luck]] so an argument could be made that he actually could beat Ragna. They're both CosmicPlaythings and use [[ShapeshifterWeapon weapons that are primarily swords but can shapeshift into scythes if the wielder wants]]. For all intents and purposes the description essentially lies and the match would've been much more interesting had Ruby been replaced by her uncle]].

* Tropers/InvaderWeezle: Oh, WebVideo/ChrisStuckmann, it's a shame that I want to leave an entry for this guy. I've always considered him to be my favorite movie reviewer on Website/YouTube, being in that perfect middle ground where he's just a regular guy enjoying movies but then also trying to gain a greater understanding for the medium. But at some point it feels like he's changed to where he has acts more superior to others than he did before, and that's especially apparent in his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GamrRXyIUs Analyzed review]] of ''Film/RogueOne''. First off, he had already done [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxWFm5kUBGk two]] [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZHrFZuKYk8 reviews]] of ''Rogue One'', plus he co-starred in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pyzs1MPMXB4 Nostalgia Critic's review]] where, despite following a script meant for comedy, he still presents his same unironic opinions that he presented in his reviews. Since these three videos all came out in December 2016 right around when the movie came out and the Analyzed review came out three months later, it would be fine if he had significantly changed his opinions or had some new perspective on the film, but he doesn't. His opinions are exactly the same as the three other videos he shared them in, and his perspectives are the same as any other think piece criticizing ''Rogue One''. But this isn't about his opinions on the movie, this is about his attitude in his Analyzed video. This video served no purpose but to call out the fans on liking the movie. The way he presented his criticisms in his other reviews was in a reasonably respectable "I felt like these things were weak, I thought these things didn't work, etc." attitude. But in the Analyzed review, his tone is incredibly condescending and passive aggressive to fans of the film, in a more "Stop defending this thing, I'm going to tell you why you're wrong" attitude. He paraphrases common defenses for the film in an indisputably mocking tone, and he blatantly says that you would only really like ''Rogue One'' if you're simple-minded when it comes to ''Star Wars ''and you don't appreciate the "deep" aspects like he does. Which leads into the absolute worst part of this video: everything to do with his "Phantom Menacing" term, which he says is when people are in denial that a movie disappointed them. He's mentioned Phantom Menacing before, but I brushed it off at the time because I won't pretend it doesn't sometimes happen where your own hype can get you to enjoy something a lot more on the first experience than you will in subsequent times. In this video however, it really pissed me off because he's using this to belittle fans of things he doesn't like. He boldly asks "Are people Phantom Menacing ''Rogue One''?" It's like he can't accept that he's in the minority opinion on something, so he just assumes that everyone else is in denial and he's the correct one in all of this, and eventually everyone will come to their senses and agree with him. And combined with his aforementioned comment about how you would only like ''Rogue One'' if all ''Franchise/StarWars'' is to you is "Lol Excitement Action Visuals Fighting Explosions!", it's pretty clear that he doesn't think highly of the intelligence of ''Rogue One'' fans. For that matter, this whole Phantom Menacing thing is insulting to ''Film/ThePhantomMenace'' fans. Chris acts like everyone came to their senses and decided Phantom Menace is bad, and there certainly were fans that changed their mind on the movie, but the movie still to this day has plenty of fans who unironically like and defend it. Are they just still in denial after 18 years? Attitudes like Chris's do nothing but try to discredit perspectives. Another Troper included Creator/DougWalker's Disneycember video on ''The Phantom Menace'' on this page for how Doug acts like fans are in denial and are too dumb to realize the movie is bad, and it's the same thing with Chris' video. Just an all-around insulting video that served no purpose but to tell people how dumb they are and how them praising something upsets him, and Chris should probably check his ego.

* Tropers/MisterToodleoo: In Ottomagic Critic’s commentary on Logomax’s commentary on [[Website/GoAnimate Brendan Barney]]’s harsh message to The Previews Guy, Ottomagic Critic brings up the fact that The Previews Guy has raged in allcaps when correcting people on movie release information. So, what’s the next negative thing he says about The Previews Guy? It’s that he “uploads fucking [[Series/BarneyAndFriends Barney]] VHS openings”. Hold it right there! The Previews Guy has that username because he uploads all kinds of VHS and DVD openings, not just Barney ones. So, since when is associating with anything to do with Barney considered a crime against maturity? Heck, I wouldn’t be surprised if Ottomagic Critic [[ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontWatch hasn’t even watched Barney]]! This is where I gave up on even skimming through this video. UPDATE: I watched the full video on August 27, 2023.