There are subjectives, and then there are these. While you may believe a work fits here, and you might be right, people tend to have rather vocal, differing opinions about this subject. Please keep these off of the work's page.
In the long winding history of Hollywood, people reflect on the movies they've seen and gauge the quality of the movies, the best scenes, etc. But often times there will come a time where you're watching a movie and see a part that will strike a chord with you and make you wonder what the hell were the writers thinking.
These are those moments.
Sign your entries.
One moment per movie to a troper, if multiple entries are signed to the same troper the more recent one will be cut.
Moments only, no "just everything he said," or "The entire movie," entries.
No contesting entries. This is subjective, the entry is their opinion.
No natter. As above, anything contesting an entry will be cut, and anything that's just contributing more can be made its own entry.
duralict: Camp. "Someday I'll have to make guy friends who don't wear lipstick." What an unbelievably awful thing to say to your gay best friend.
terlwyth: I never liked the idea of a campy reboot because Batman Returns didn't make enough money, but I was hoping it'd be decent. That however was instantly not the case when the Graysons decide to dispose of the bomb (which looks stupid) Two Face planted themselves instead of fleeing and getting proper authorities. There are other problems I have with this scene, but I'll skip to the death. So basically Two-Face shoots wildly and happens to cut the ropes The Graysons are on (except Dick) and they plummet to their deaths in what appears to be a little too peaceful while Two-Face conveniently finds a trap door to escape and then there wasn't a funeral and they weren't referenced next film. What?
Spidey Terry: Batman Forever as a whole was lacking, but the introduction of Robin to the series is a real DMOS. It doesn't work because we don't get a ten-year-old Dick Grayson grieving over his parents (who were killed mid-act simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time) and having nowhere else to turn but a sympathetic Bruce Wayne. The movie essentially uses the Broad Strokes of this origin (though throws Two-Face into the mix and makes the parents chronic heroes with deaths boarding on Senseless Sacrifice), but utilizes a young adult Dick Grayson. Bruce naturally feels sympathy for a fellow orphan, but it doesn't ring nearly as true as it does in the comics because of Dick being aged up. Dick in this movie is perfectly capable of living on his own. This sizable lapse in story and logic just kept nagging me for the rest of the movie. It's Plot-Induced Stupidity just to get him to Wayne Manor and as the comics long-since demonstrated, it wasn't even necessary! Frankly, Dick comes across as a sponge that lucked into a big meal ticket rather than a grieving would-be hero wanting to make things right.
Animeking1108: The end of Batman Begins. Not only does Scarecrow get the short end of the stick (despite beingadvertised as theBig Bad), but Ra's Al Ghul was defeated in the most anti-climactic way possible. Basically, the bridge on the train went out, and Batman just left Ra's for dead. Okay, Batman has killed in both the movies and the early comics before, but "I'm not going to kill you, but I don't have to save you" was such a gigantic Writer Cop Out. Especially considering he still technically killed him. At least in The Dark Knight, Two-Face's death was somewhat accidental.
Umbrage: Yeah, it was a cop out to try and give Batman a cool one-liner. They could've claimed that Gordon killed him since he shot out the rail, or had Batman admit to killing him because there really was no other option, but they went with really shitty logic to try and make both Batman and Gordon look good.
RAZ: There's one thing I absolutely hate about this movie. It's not Bale's laughably bad bat-voice. It's not even the fact that this movie pretty much steals the entire plot of Tim Burton's film. No the real shining moment of suck for me is after The Reveal where the real Ra's reveals his true identity. He defeats Bruce, leaves his mansion on fire, and has him trapped under a giant beam. As Bruce struggles to get out, Ra's looks at him and says "You destroyed my home and left me to die. It's only fair I do the same," and walks off. All I can say is "WHAT. THE. FUCK?!" Did the writers just... not even look at their own script before they started filming?! While the first point may be true, the second couldn't be further from the truth. Bruce most certainly risks his life to save his enemy, and ultimately leaves him in the care of a female villager before taking off. Why the hell would Ra's think that Bruce just casually to left him to die?! Even if the woman decided to be a bitch and not tell him at all that he was saved, Ra's shouldn't be that stupid to think that someone didn't come to save him considering that he happened to be unconscious at the time, and his men had already all escaped by that point so Bruce was the only one who could have saved him. Now if the line was something like, "You let the man you thought was me die," since the fake Ra's was dead by then, or "you may have saved me/showed me mercy, but I won't be as forgiving" it could be understandable, but the line as is makes absolutely zero sense. It's just a giant statement of how the filmmakers didn't even give a damn.
Mightymoose101: Bane's defeat in The Dark Knight Rises. . The film builds up Bane as the biggest threat Batman has ever faced, possibly even more so than The Joker. He figures out his secret identity, he breaks into his armoury and steals all his equipment, he ruins him financially, and he even beats him physically and nearly breaks his spine. So of course you'd expect the film to give him an extremely satisfactory and epic showdown at the end? No. After getting thoroughly beaten by Batman, Talia is revealed to be the Man Behind the Man and the child who escaped the prison, not Bane.. This undoes practically all the mystic and buildup behind Bane's character, revealing him to instead be some lovesick puppy. Bane himself is demoted to a Giant Mook, and is ultimately killed by being shot with his pants down by Catwoman of all people. This was by far the most anticlimactic final showdown in the Batman film history, and an extremely unfitting way to send off one of the best villains in The Dark Knight Saga.
morninglight Seconded. What makes his incongruous is that every other villain got a sendoff. Jonathan Crane is reduced to a posh thug. Ra's al'Ghul accepts his defeat and meditates before his death. The Joker laughs as always when he's taken into custody. Harvey Dent tragically becomes a murderer who Batman is forced to push to his death. Talia, who was a villain for all of five minutes, gets a death scene. Bane is... shot by Selina Kyle and promptly forgotten about. He's not even the center of attention, he gets lost in the shuffle. This movie was nearly three hours long, couldn't they spend one minute on Bane's death?
Tropers/legomaniac90: Thirded. The reveal of Talia is barely foreshadowed, comes out of nowhere, and isn't really necessary to the main plot: Bane was already built up to be Ra's successor, and the only one Batman could actually defeat. Having Talia be the Big Bad takes all that away and misses the opportunity to have Bane and Batman go at each other with nothing holding them back.
Crazyrabbits: The time skip. It's revealed that Bruce Wayne stopped fighting crime (and became a recluse for eight years) because of Rachel's death. In The Dark Knight, he wasn't so broken up over her death that he stopped fighting altogether (to the point that he was even bantering with Alfred the day after). Batman has retired in several different continuities before (Knightfall, Batman Beyond, A Death In The Family, The Dark Knight Returns), but all of those instances were either caused by Wayne being physically unable to fight anymore, or having a significant crisis of faith. Yet, in this film, he apparently up immediately after the Two-Face confrontation (and after a year of fighting crime), undermining the entire "escalation" and "freaks like me" themes from the first and second film, respectively. Even more nonsensical is that this time skip also results in the crime rate in the city dropping to non-existent levels for close to an entire decade - so Dent basically succeeded in his crusade because of - no, in spite of - Batman's presence?
Leaven: In the movie 40 Days and 40 Nights, Nicole, Matt's ex-girlfriend, wants to stop Matt from completing his vow to abstain from sex for Lent. Her reason for doing this is to win the prize money that has collecting from people betting on whether Matt will complete his vow. So, Nicole goes to Matt's apartment where he has chained himself to the bed in order to ensure that he completes his vow, and rapes him. That's bad, but what makes this movies even worse is Erica, his current girlfriend, comes into the room and assumes he cheated on her. So, he has to apologize to her for being raped! Nicole wins the prize money and gets away with her crime. What the fuck were the writers thinking?
CAD: There is one scene in the Doom movie which stands out for how atrociously bad it is. In the final fight scene, The Rock breaks off a metal wire and wraps it around his arm. This is how the movie nods to the Cyberdemon.
Korval: The Eragon movie has one. Anyway, Eragon has a dream about Arya, a woman he's only ever heard of by this point and one he first met in a dream. She's being tortured. So naturally, he wakes up and wants to rescue her. Then, Jeremy Irons as Brom uses his acting talent to its fullest (well, the fullest that the writing lets him) to try to convince Eragon not to go off half-cocked, to act responsibly and so forth. Irons' performance gives you a real sense of the urgency in Eragon not doing this. And then Eragon says, "Your shame is not mine!" At this point, liking Eragon (the character) has been rendered 100% impossible. It's like crossing the Moral Event Horizon, only without having to actually kill anyone. It would have been much more acceptable if Irons hadn't been so damned convincing in his performance, because Eragon's blowing him off so easily and so harshly just makes you want to reach through the screen and choke the shit out of him.
Sick Brit Kid: There's a reason even fans of the book series hate this movie. Whereas a lot of Eragon's deplorable acts in the book series can be Handwaved by the fact that he's got a lot of pressure and has to make really tough decisions...the movie basically justified all of the Hatedom's hatred for the book series by stripping away all of the depth of the main character, instead turning him into a pretentious...what's the word.
Jonn: Mine was when Brom asks Eragon how old he is—"15? 16?" And our hero retorts "seven...teen!" in a terribly acted manner. Why did they hire this kid?
Stele Resolve: I hated pretty much the entire movie, but if I had to choose one thing, it would be the hatching. The book has a cool series of events where Sapphira hatches from the egg, and Eragon is forced to hide her and care for her in secret, slowly raising her from infancy to something approximating adolescence, and even having to find an appropriate name for her. He does everything from feeding her to teaching her to associate human words with objects around her. In the movie? She hatches, and in a magical moment flies off and turns into an adult dragon, complete with an understanding of human language and a fully developed mind! Presto, no character development needed, just add Narm!
Peteman: In Serenity, when we find out just how deep the corruption and particularly the incompetence runs in the Alliance, and given how tired and overused that theme is in Joss Whedon franchises, I felt like he was reaching out of the screen to insult me personally.
ondarisa: For me, it was the scene where the crew returns to Haven to find it wiped out. Mal orders the crew to cover his ship with the blood and corpses of their dead friends, and he'll kill anyone who dares to confront him about it. Particularly jarring when in the next scene he shrugs off the Operative's Not So Different speech with "I don't kill children"...he just threatens to kill the people he thinks of that way. I simply couldn't view him as a hero after that.
Allronix: "A leaf on the wind..." CRASH! THUD! C'mon, Joss. That was totally pointless, didn't advance the plot, had no impact on the rest of the plotline events, and was a bit of cheap shock by reverting to your usual cliche of killing off a character just to invoke the Anyone Can Die trope. At least Book got to take down the sons of bitches in that cruiser! But this just proves that Joss can't tie his shoes without some cheap character death.
Slowzombie: Repo! The Genetic Opera, the scene where Shilo stands up to her father for the first time. Not a bad moment in itself, but the song that follows is not at all pleasant. For one, it feels out of place, with a sudden swerve from the established "we sing to talk"-style to the more music video-like "band and dancers out of nowhere"-style. In addition, it is a little... creepy.
Now, I'm sure there's a perfectly good reason why they would stop their 'serious' musical to include a 'rocking' teen rebellion song that has nothing to do with padding the soundtrack, but whatever it is, this song is just awful, so much so that TV Tropes, which is run by people who like everything, lists this scene as Repo' Dethroning Moment of Suck.
Enchanter468: During the Starship Troopers movie, the Roughnecks are heading through a canyon and one of them is snatched by a huge, flying pseudo-arachnid, which proceeds to land on a ledge and begins to torture the man with its stinger and bladed limbs. Lieutenant Rasczak calls for Sugar Watkins (another soldier) to toss him a specialized sniper rifle. He zooms in on the bug and its prisoner, and I'm expecting some kind of Crowning Moment Of Awesome where Rasczak snipes the Bug, but instead he shoots the wounded man (the one who had been screaming for help) through the heart...and lets the Bug get away. The Mercy Kill might be justifiable, but would it bother you too much to shoot the damn thing rather than letting it fly off to tell all its friends where all the tasty humans are?
Garm: What makes it even worse, is that he had plenty of time to shoot the bug before it started ripping the soldier apart, but he just watches through the scope as it rips into him, and then kills him. Also, why did Razak demand that they kill him after he lost his legs, when the rescue ship was right there? Remember how when the characters first go to enlist, the recruiter has fully-functioning robotic legs, payed for by the military...?
Azzizzi: Yeah, this is kind of a poor ripoff of a similar scene in The Sand Pebbles where it makes sense when Jake Holman (played by Steve McQueen) wants to shoot the Chinese who are torturing his helper, Po-han (played by Mako). The ship's captain orders Holman not to shoot at the Chinese because it will start a war. Holman shoots Po-han to put him out of his misery.
Galahad PC: While so much of the movie is blissfully stupid and enjoyable if you don't think too hard... try watching it with the commentary by Verhoeven and the writer. Many delightful moments include explaining how the actors aren't really in orbit around Jupiter (that's just a special effect, you see), constantly changing gears on what the movie was trying to be about, talking about how faithful they were to the "message" of the original book, and Verhoeven getting the point of one scene completely backwards until he was given a reminder. That stuff is just plain hilarious to listen to. No, the mind-boggling self-dethroning comes when they start talking about Carmen. It turns out that Carmen tested really badly in test audiences in every single demographic, everywhere in the world. Verhoeven's response? Clearly, the entire world just isn't ready for a strong and intelligent woman, who apparently never existed in fiction until 1997. Even better, they try to take credit for creating everything about her, when she was already a smart, talented and combat-tested pilot in the original book.
Snarf: Specifically, the original book makes a point of mentioning that women were more talented than men at space piloting (going into detail about reflexes, stamina, emotional stability, etc.) and only the very brightest people of either gender get into that particular assignment. Verhoeven, et.al. apparently didn't read thoroughly enough and want to blame the source material rather than their own casting decisions. Although there is a certain amount of Fridge Brilliance to not shooting the flying Bug—such lapses in judgement do explain why the humans appear to be losing the war rather badly.
Enchanter468: I would like to submit Jurassic Park III, specifically, the moment where the a Spinosaurus mauls a T-Rex. I understand Spinosaurus was slightly larger, but just think about this for a moment. The T-Rex opens the fight by running up and chomping on the Spinosaur's neck, and it only inflicts some superficial cuts!? Those things' teeth were serrated and rounded in cross section to sustain greater bite force, and fossils of their victims show that those teeth could cut right through skin and muscle and punch big fracking holes in the bones. Couple that with the dinosaur's massive jaw pressure, and that first neck chomp should have crippled the Spinosaurus for life, if not killed it outright.
Baronobeefdip: Agreed. The whole "Spino VS. T. rex" battle was little more than for Jack Horner (the Paleontologist who helped with the so-called "accuracy" of the dinosaurs in the films) to show off his dubious "Tyrannosaurus was a scavenger" hypothesis. Apparently, the filmmakers (and Horner himself) have forgotten that there's (though limited) fossil evidence that T. rex was a social animal (It may have lived in small family groups)... which means that Spinosaurus would've had to deal with not just one Tyrannosaurus but several. All these inaccuracies just makes the "T. rex VS Spino" scene all the more a DMOS.
Time Traveler Jessica: For me it was the critic getting killed brutally. The movie before had been pretty light-hearted, if a little spooky, and I was totally willing to except it as a goofy fantasy. And then that happens. A character being brutally killed, just because he was movie reviewer and kind of a jerk. M.Night, seriously, that just came across as whiny and mean-spirited.
Tropers/Hyrin: For me, the movie was tolerable until Shymalan declared himself (through his character) a misunderstood Christ figure that we should be ashamed of ourselves for not liking. Any chance the film had of being watchable after that went out the window.
X 2 X: In The Village, yet another M. Night Shyamalanclassic, we had the obligatory Twist Ending. The eponymous village is not set in 1897, but was actually founded during in the late 1970s and is essentially a human wildlife reserve/science observatory plant. The female lead learns this when one member of the community falls ill and requires medical aid that is only found in the modern-day society. Fittingly enough, this movie is almost unanimously hailed as the point where his movies were thrust into third gear... right into the realm of suck. What a tweeeest, indeed.
Crazyrabbits: The "dance scene" in Memoirs of a Geisha, where the newly-minted geisha Sayuri (Zhang Ziyi) performs a dance amid a blanket of fake snow onstage...the only problem is that it's not a dance, despite what the characters claim. Sayuri walks onto the stage in six-inch platform shoes, waves her umbrella around for a few moments and jumps around acting spastically for a few seconds. She dances for less than two minutes. Yet, everyone thinks this is good enough to give her a standing ovation. Putting aside all the other problems with the film (slow pacing, unlikable characters, cultural inaccuracies), the dance scene proves that Hollywood didn't understand the concept of a geisha at all.
baronobeefdip: I find Godzilla Final Wars to be a Guilty Pleasure for the most part, but I find there's one glaring DMOS going agaisnt it. What is it, you ask? It's during the final battle when Monster X transforms into Keizer Ghidorah. What? Ok, Toho, I can forgive the ridiculously short "Godzilla VS (Insert monster here)" battles. I can forgive the silly Matrix/X-Men/Star Wars inspired "human vs alien" plot. I can forgive that the "Mothra VS Gigan" plot point lead to nothing but a rather pointless cameo by Kamikaze Mothra at the end. What I can't forgive however, is that you turned what was an exciting battle between Godzilla and a new foe into yet another Godzilla VS Ghidorah battle. Yes, Toho you made me lose interest at the climax of the film due to turning an original fight into a cliched one.
fluffything: For me, it was the aforementioned "Kamikaze Mothra's pointless cameo". While most of the monster fights are short, they are excuseable in that all the set-up we get for them is that they're going to fight Godzilla eventually. But, with Mothra, it's set up that she has a past history with Gigan and that the Shobijin summon her to aid Godzilla in battle. Does this mean we get to see scenes of Mothra flying after Godzilla to battle? Do we get an epic build-up to an awesome monster-team up? Nope, Mothra shows up at the climax of the film, fights Gigan, gets set on fire, and rams into him killing them both (There is a deleted scene showing Mothra flying back home to Infant Island, but, that doesn't make sense since she's, ya know...dead.). What a waste. They set up Mothra as being crucial to the plot of the film and utterly waste her on-screen time. It's the equivalent of setting up Batman to guest-star in a Superman film only to have him make a brief cameo where he and The Joker fight and fall off a building to their deaths. Dissapointing to no end.
Rick Havoc: Star Trek: Insurrection is almost entirely made of suck, but the moment that stands out for me is when Riker flies the Enterprise through some gaseous Phlebotinum... with a manual steering column joystick that magically emerges from the deck of the bridge and does nothing that the helm console itself isn't designed to do.
Hoodiecrow: Saving Private Ryan, "James, earn this." Um, you know, Ryan hadn't exactly asked for any of this as a personal favor. The boy simply wanted to do his duty, and did so gallantly to the end; how can he be in your debt? The film should have been named Condemning Private Ryan to a Lifetime of Regret and Guilt instead.
Trombone Child: I didn't feel this way initially, but the more I think about it, I think that Dropping an Air Conditioner on the van in The A-Team movie might be this, especially since B. A. didn't rebuild it during the course of the film. What was the point of introducing it, then, and why would the writers want to destroy something so iconic?
Man Called True: The scene where they distract a beholder with a tossed pebble. A beholder... falling for a tossed pebble. Beholders have genius-level Intelligence (18 as a racial average, the maximum for a starting character in 3rd Edition), are master magicians, and - oh yeah - have independantly-moving eyestalks. Any beholder worth its copper pieces would have followed the pebble with one eye and wiped out the heroes with all the others. If you're going to use an iconic D&D monster, don't just throw it in and then treat it like Standard Cliche Hollywood Guard #221.
Korval: Star Trek 2009. The entire Kobayashi Maru scene. No one part can be singled out for idiocy, because the whole thing is a black hole of stupid. Kirk is a monumental jackass throughout the entire thing. Nobody in the simulation takes it seriously. Kirk's cheating is blatantly obvious, yet when asked, Spock is unable to explain why Kirk could win. It's just complete monumental fail on pretty much every level.
Pumbelo: I second that. What made it worse was that they even fucked up the entire point of that test: it's to experience a situation where you can't possibly win. In the movie, they say it's to experience fear - despite the fact that no one in the situation is acting accordingly. No one takes it seriously even in universe!
Anarquistador: One thing that really needled me was the identification of the enemy as "Klingon Warbirds." Dammit, man! Klingons don't use Warbirds! Romulans use Warbirds! Am I being a needlessly pedantic nerd? Well, maybe. But it would have been just as easy to get that detail right, and not doing so seems like another indicator that the whole scene was just a Mythology Gag.
sephiroth144 That the test overseers wouldn't be doing some serious checking with the jerkassing is a question, but I could let that roll. For me, it was the promotion of Kirk at the end. Even allowing all the Plot-Induced Stupidity to get to that point, (especially that there was apparently one non-cadet on the entire frakking ship), jumping someone at least 7 grades in authority because he did (exceptionally) well in one crisis is utter insanity. Kirk not only earned the animosity of everyone else in Starfleet, (especially career military who are now his subordinates, some of whom were literally in the service while he was in diapers), he has no idea how to do anything except, maybe, handle a crisis. How is he going to file officer evaluation reports for his lieutenants, deal with transfer requests, supply issues, etc- the day to day minutae of being a (naval) captain? I seriously hope the next movie opens with the Enterprise being the biggest joke in the fleet with Kirk's utter incompetence blazing through.
Snarf: the whole promotion scenario is a slap in the face not only to the veteran Starfleet officers, but also to the people to whom Kirk owes his life—Chekov (with the transporter), Sulu (by having that sword handy), and especially Scotty (without whom Kirk would likely have remained marooned on Delta Vega, as the Federation didn't know about Spock Prime and with Nero's ongoing rampage they weren't likely to go checking on a minor outpost anytime soon.) All they get is all Kirk should have gotten: their commissions (or, in Scotty's case, off the shitlist) and the heartfelt thanks of the Federation. In fact, Scotty should be most resentful of all. Spock has dumped an unruly cadet in his lap without warning or explanation, and did not have the courtesy to at least send along extra supplies, forcing Scotty to share his already limited food supply with someone whom he basically has to place under arrest. To top it off, this same insubordinate cadet is then promoted past Scotty, who already was a commissioned officer and who was grounded for doing his job. Keep in mind Kirk was earlier caught spying on Uhura in her dorm room, an offense that in the 21st century military would have seen him court-martialed, sent to the brig, and dishonorably discharged no matter what else he might have done.
Tropers/Kendo_Bunny: Keep in mind that I'm a swordfighter trained in Kendo, but I really didn't like this part: Sulu explained he had been trained in fencing, and then swung his sword around like he was trying to hit a pinata. The basics of Western-style fencing are easily learned. Granted, western fencing, combat fencing, and kendo are quite different from one another. His style could have borrowed from either one. However, nothing he did on that platform suggested he had ever held a sword in his life, let alone been highly trained.
Crazyrabbits: Star Trek: Into Darkness: The concentrated idiocy of Kirk's "death" and subsequent resurrection. It's one thing to make homages to The Wrath of Khan (the '09 film has many similarities with the former, and is still very enjoyable). It's quite another to rip it off wholesale without any of the drama or character development while bastardizing the canon, for several reasons. (1) In WoK, Spock sacrifices himself to repair the warp engines, and is seen manually replacing parts in the warp reactor. In Darkness, Kirk accomplishes the same thing by... kicking a piece of shrapnel into place. (2) McCoy realizes that Kirk can be saved with Khan's blood... because the Tribble he was experimenting on came back to life. Hinging your Deus Ex Machina on the creature that acts as comic relief? (3) The Enterprise races all the way to Qo'nos (called "Kronos" in this film, for no discernible reason) and lets Spock beat up Khan, instead of pulling the blood from any of the other super-soldiers still onboard the Enterprise and injecting it into Kirk that way. The real capper, though, is that it makes Kirk's character arc in the film (where he's finally faced with the weight of his command decisions, and sacrifices himself to save everyone) is completely pointless - he wakes up and they go on their merry way, proving he hasn't learned a thing from Pike's peptalks.
TairaMai: You know that gag in SfDebris's reviews where the Duras sisters are replaced by various sci-fi villains? The same thing applies to this movie but it hurts. BenedictCumberbatch is a great actor, but he's playing Khan. Not some generic villain but TheStar Trek villain that beat Kirk and Spock. It's not the actor, it's the lukewarm dialogue and the plot points that don't live up to him or the character. J.J. Abrams, Robert Orci or who ever is responsible, They Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot.
Cannotrememberpasswords: This troper understands that Revenge of the Fallen is meant to be a big dumb action flick. However, after running it over in his mind, he found one scene that is emblematic of why that film is still totally inexcusable: Devastator. Yes, he looked cool, and he was pretty well designed, and he was built up fairly well, but what does he do in the movie? (1) Get his ass kicked (by Skids and Mudflap, of all bots). Mudflap clawing his way out of Devastator's gullet doesn't redeem Mudflap for being so Primus-damned annoying as was intended. It robs Devastator of any actual threatening potential and gives us more scenes with Mudflap, whom the audience has now realized is invincible. (2) Rip up the top of a pyramid. When half the cast are twenty-foot robots, that's really not very impressive. In the first movie, Optimus was gouging foot-deep holes in concrete with every step and crashing through skyscrapers while fighting Megatron, and Bumblebee destroys a house as collateral damage in the opening. Any single one of the characters could have smashed the pyramid into sand by accident, making Devastator completely pointless. (3) Get killed in one shot by a railgun. Not only is it more evidence of the absurd hoo-rah military worship the movies exhibit, it comes as a detriment to the story, as it makes his death anticlimactic. Why have all the Autobots team up to kill him, when you could have a Deus ex Machina, never mentioned prior, never again used, destroy him in one single blast? "Join the army! We rob any excitement from a movie, because apparently we fight giant alien robots better than their millenia-old sworn adversaries!" (4) Oh, yeah, and they gave him testicles.
So We Ate Them: In a film full of grating, poorly-handled dick jokes, the treatment of Devastator gives a new meaning to "new low." The Big Bad has testes. And that's the joke. Yet they still felt compelled to explain it.
Philipnova798 If I had to choose one moment, I have to go with the entire desert fight. Aside from Bumblebee kicking both Rampage and Ravage's asses. The entire thing was just a poorly edited mass of military, sand, explosions, bad comedy and poorly done CGI. But what really drives my hatred for this is the ending. As we all know The Fallen has succeeded in his plan and is about exterminate the sun. All the while giving out Laser-Guided Karma to the military trying to stop it. Only to have Optimus Prime destroy the Harvester and kill The Fallen in what has to be the worst one-sided fight in history. Compounded by The Fallen not even attempting to fight back and the lackluster CG that looks more like Transmorphers than a $200 million movie. Also, what the hell was Michael Bay thinking by including the Cybertronian version of Heaven?
LWS: Dark of the Moon does this as well, in a particularly infuriating manner. Noteworthy portions of the Decepticon cast were killed off by humans. "Kudos" to the pathetic excuse of a death they gave Starscream—at the hands of Sam Witwicky.
Regu14: At least they all went out fighting. This troper was was absolutely pissed when Ironhide was given a sudden, pointless death. After the second film moved him into the back seat, we see him do something badass when he saves Sam and Bumblebee, He's then unceremoniously killed off by Sentinel with a cheap shot to the back. The worst part is the fact that Ironhide doesn't even get the chance to fight back and he justs rusts away. I'm not a fan of Ironhide, but that scene offended me as it was a great dis-service to his character and no one, I repeat, no one gives two shits about it.
Darth Megatron: Megatron's death. Sure he was injured and all, but his appearance in Dark Of The Moon showed him to be the Anticlimax Boss of Anticlimax Bosses. It provided a particularly embarrassing example of Badass Decay for the alleged Big Bad of the entire Transformers brand when we could have had a climactic, spectacular final battle between the Big Good, his arch-enemy, and the new Bigger Bad who happens to be equal in power and wisdom to the other two - this would have provided a satisfying ending to an otherwise brilliantly-executed hour-long exhilarating nonstop series of action sequences. Whatever happened to the humongous mechanical monster who handed Optimus' ass to him in the first film, not to mentioninothercontinuities?
Tropers/Hyrin: Sentinel's betrayal, especially if you are familiar with the character's portrayal in other mediums (in both the Marvel comics and the G1 cartoon, he died heroically in battle defending Cybertron from Megatron). It comes out of nowhere, and it a huge stab in the back of anyone who grew up with the franchise.
Spidey Terry: What I found so irritating is that they killed off Laurie in the opening minutes and left it at that. Now, that was a really good sequence, but what's next? Tracking down Laurie's son, the apparently last living relative? You'd think so since Michael's M.O. is going after his relatives. However, instead, he goes home and essentially plays janitor in his home. Eesh. The basic plot could've made a decent horror flick, but no way this should've been the direction for a Halloween movie. Eesh, if they were gonna bring back Michael, they should've gone all out - not just inserted him into a plot that could've been anyone else's.
Zuul MF: The idea is that he has finished his task after killing Laurie and is sort of just laying low in some weird kind of retirement until the kids come and bother him. That's right: they ended the series at the beginning of the movie, not the end. And Laurie's stupidity was such an Out-of-Character Moment. I believe one reviewer whose name escapes me put it that it's like beginning Moby Dick with: "Call me Ishmael. We caught the whale."
Stele Resolve: Funny Games. Psychotic couple of creeps holds family hostage, plays mind games with them, yada yada yada. The only thing that made this movie different from most others like it is how real the emotions of the characters seemed, and how one of the villains routinely broke the 4th wall. So the mom finally demonstrates a crowning moment of awesome when she grabs the elephant rifle that the villains carelessly left lying around and blows one's guts all over the wall. Then the movie erases this and turns everything following it into a dethroning moment of suck when Paul grabs a TV remote control, rewinds the movie, and prevents her from getting the gun.
De Luman: Law Abiding Citizen at the very end of the movie, the character Clyde, who had been shown to be a Magnificent Bastard par excellance, makes stupid mistake after stupid mistake in order to let the DA Nick, figure out how to stop him. Not only this, but the movie tries to turn the phrase "Fuck his civil rights" into a CMOA.
Valkir: That fucking stupid "Chaos Reigns" fox in Antichrist. The movie was slow, dull, and by-the-numbers "humans suck and our director is depressed" nonsense up to then, which was not awful, but that completely ridiculous and jarringly awful moment of Narm fully established that it was all a bunch of artsy pretension disguising a really basic and unremarkable film with some handwave explanation misogyny thrown in.
Devoured By Robots: God, I didn't even manage to make it seconds before my dethroning moment, which was the baby clearly committing merciful suicide to escape its completely unlikeable parents having graphic sex in the bathroom to opera in pretentious black-and-white slow-motion. The rest of the film was like a Dragging Footnote of Suck to compliment the opening sequence.
Cabbit Girl Emi: Big Bully has got to be one of the worst movies I've ever seen.note And it's a shame because Rick Moranis is one of of my favorite actors, if not, my most favorite. Here, we have David Leary, the movie's protagonist and Butt Monkey, who is constantly living in fear after his old bully Roscoe Bigger, a.k.a. Fang, comes back into his life. Somewhere in the second half of the movie, Roscoe pulls a couple of pranks on David (greasing up the floor, putting paint on the rim of his coffee mug). Then a chase scene ensues in the hallway until David goes to the principal's office to tell him that Roscoe has been messing with him again, and what does the principal do? He brushes David off because Roscoe worked as the shop teacher long enough and warns David that he will be put on a 1-week probation. This is especially painful when we get this following line:
David: But I'm the town hero...note David became a successful writer many years after he tattles on Roscoe for stealing a moon rock.
Stele Resolve: Hellbound: Hellraiser II was a kind of pointless and confusing sequel to the first movie, but it was interesting at the very least for most of the movie, and Pinhead and the other Cenobites reprised their roles as badass villains. Then the Smug Snakedoctor is lured into a trap and subjected to horrible torture within the realm of the Cenobites (really should have seen that coming, he literally walked into it). Fine and dandy. A little later, though, he returns transformed into a Cenobite. Okay. Then a giant phallic tentacle attaches itself to his head and carries him around. What. He immediately proceeds to chew the scenery of the rest of the movie with corny Pre Mortem One Liners like "The doctor is in" and "I recommend...amputation!" As if that wasn't bad enough to ruin the movie, the true Dethroning Moment of Suck occurs when the original Cenobites not only renounce their roles as badass villains, but promptly get slaughtered like cattle by the most cliched and hammy Big Bad the horror genre has ever seen. Congratulations, you've successfully stripped this movie of everything that kept it from completely sucking.
Stele Resolve: I wasn't greatly impressed with Black Christmas (1974) (the original); it was rather dull, predictable, and the character stupid. But the unforgivably moronic moment came at the very end, with the police burst into the sorority house to find the supposed killer dead at the hands of the last survivor, Hussey's character. So they haul his body off and talk about what a horrible event this has been...and then they just leave. Yeah, that girl's been through some pretty severe trauma and shock, but I'm sure leaving her alone in the very house where the source of her trauma occurred, without so much as a single cop or doctor to watch over her, is a perfectly sound idea.
timotaka: Same here, but I would also like to add one more Wall Banger: the ending shows undiscovered corpses in the attic of the house, implying that the police don't even bother searching through the house to find people who are still missing!
Lord Crayak: There was one cop shown guarding the front door as the credits roll...a seemingly lone guard doesn't make things any less of a WallBanger though.
Dan Dan Noodles: The Rock was a silly movie start to end, which, OK, don't expect subtlety and nuance from Michael Bay. But one scene in particular is so egregriously dumb that it turned me into a bad theater neighbor, as I was compelled to say, out loud, "Oh, come on!" — when Mason cuts through a plate glass window with... a quarter. Not a special diamond-edged, super-secret spy window-cutter cleverly designed as a quarter, mind you. A plain old quarter, straight out of his pocket. Seriously, they aren't even trying at that point, just seeing how much they can put over on moviegoers so long as they sandwich it between lots of shiny lights and explosions.
pvtnum11: Possibly handwaved; I recall Mason slams the metal chair leg onto the quarter before picking it up, and that might have put a sharp edge on the quarter. Maybe. My DMOS on that movie was having every single SEAL getting waxed by the wayward Marines. Yeah, okay, high-ground and all that, but really?
Stele Resolve: Sleepaway Camp was a pretty ridiculous movie, a cheap cash in on the then-popular slasher franchise. It's not a very good movie, poorly acted, whatever. The real WallBanger, the unforgivable moment of stupidity, is when Angela, the most likely killer, turns out to be the killer. Why is that such a big deal? Because the movie clearly makes an effort to disguise the killer's identity until the very end, but does such a poor job that a child could call it from the half-hour mark. Seriously, it was so obvious that the creepy, thousand-yard-stare psycho girl is the killer that throughout the entire movie, I kept turning to my roommate and saying "There's no way it's her. It's so obvious that it's her that it has to be someone else." Guess what? It was. Though the otherreveal about her kind of makes up for it.
Stele Resolve: Dogma was an all around hilarious movie, almost perfect. The one small thing keeping it from being a golden movie? The shit demon. Goddamn it, that was so unforgivably stupid. I mean, an extended toilet humor joke? Really? And the rest of the movie was laden with insightful and biting wit...
Erwin: It was at least a missed opportunity to introduce the Golgathan by saying Azrael "called in the Calvary."
Enchanter468: The scene in the Wing Commander movie where the Tiger Claw has to hide in an asteroid crater to avoid a Kilrathi ship, and everyone aboard the Tiger Claw has to be very, very quiet so that the other spaceship doesn't hear' them! You know, I'm okay with sound in space; I don't go after Armageddon or Star Wars or Star Trek for it, but when a movie flat out states that not only can the audience hear the sound in space, but so can the characters, that is freaking pushing it.
fluffything: The fact that Zilla was killed by freakin' missiles is what made me say "Fuck this movie". What's worse is how he's killed by missiles. He doesn't go down fighting like King Kong or his far-better Japanese counterpart. Oh, no. Instead, he gets tangeld up in the wires of the Brooklyn Bridge (Which by the way, is a suspension bridge and should've collapsed when the wires snapped) while the Air Force pretty much blast the shit out of him. That's right, the film pretty much turns the climax into an inverse Curb-Stomp Battle in which the giant monster is the one who gets pwned. This and the previously mentioned "Pregnant Iguana" aspect of the movie are why GINO is the ultimate example of character rape in any film. This movie doesn't deserve to be called "Godzilla" by any stretch of the imagination.
Ellytoad: In Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, Sybok's coolness level drops 50% when he lectures Kirk on how humans overcame their misconceptions: "The people of your planet once believed their world was flat... Columbus proved it was round."note The world was known to be round by ancient civilisations, who even estimated its circumference. Also, Magellan (not Columbus) was the one who set out to circumnavigate the Earth. And Magellan didn't do it out of a desire to prove the flat-earth theory wrong. For further details, consult your local library, which should have been the first stop for the scriptwriter.
GREGOLE: While Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem was already an unsatisfying film, the moment that really sold it for me was the bit where the predalien infects an entire room full of pregnant women. While the little kid being chestbursted earlier was cringe-inducing, it was one death out of countless. We're shown that both monsters are ruthless and inhuman, and will not make distinctions between their victims... The filmmakers apparently felt that we forgot about this, so they decided to go even more over the top, to the point where the shock is gone, and it becomes a sick snuff fantasy for the writers. It was the single most tasteless thing I have ever seen in a movie since the Toxic Avenger disemboweled a man dressed as a baby who was trying to blow up a school for the retarded on Take A Mexican To Lunch Day.
Crazyrabbits: The "romantic" subplot in the film is quite possibly the most juvenile thing in the entire Alien/Predator canon. A large part of the film is devoted to lead character Dallas' younger brother, who works as a pizza delivery boy and has feelings for a cheerleader whose Jerk Jock boyfriend throws his car keys into the sewer. It's like Dawson's Creek in a sci-fi film, and features the most painfully bad dialogue in the film ("Are you looking at the clock, or are you looking at me?") Worse yet, this storyline continues far past the point viewers are expected to care about it - the boy to win her affections in the midst of xenomorphs and Scar mysteriously killing off all the residents, it just gets in the way of the main plot and adds nothing whatsoever to the film.
fluffything: For me, it was the fact that the "Predalien" is supposed to be a "Predqueen". For one thing, it doesn't even look like it would be a Queen (Previous films establish that the Queen is significantly larger than the regular Xenomorphs). The Predqueen should be this massive horrific monstrosity, not a "Xenomorph with Predator dreadlocks". Second, the explantation is that it hasn't matured into a full-grown Queen yet. Then, shouldn't it be a chestburster still? I don't recall previous films having a stage between Queen Chestburster and Adult Queen. Third, even if we ignore all the previously mentioned nonsense (Which is already nearly impossible to do), why in the name of sanity would it have a completely different mode of reproduction? Yes, Word of God said that it hasn't developed an ovipositor yet. But, that just makes the whole idea even more idiotic. As utterly cheesy the "Newborn Alien" was in Alien Ressurection, at least it made sense within the mythos of the film...Which is more than what I can say for the "Predalien", sorry, "Predqueen".
sephiroth144: In Avatar, what happens when Jake goes to tell the Na'vi what the Skypeople want. "Hey, we want a certain rock that's under your tree" And they couldn't slant-mine? Etc... He never did his damn job, and essentially caused both sides of the slaughter that occurred.
Daedalis: The moment the commander in his shiny battlemech pulls a knife in smackdown with Sully's avatar. Supposedly someone took the time to design a mech with removable weapons (therefore susceptible to disarming), then machined a sword for it to draw in such a situation? Why not just bolt blades to the undersides of the forearms? or exposed spikes on the fists?
Many people have said the whole movie has an ableist tone to it, but one particularly cringeworthy moment was when Jake was called "numb nuts" by another character. To quote the film's Rifftrax: "What a sensitive nickname for a paraplegic character." Well played, Cameron, well played. - Time Traveler Jessica
The Dog Sage: Salazar from the Day of the Dead remake, particularly his reply when asked by another soldier 'so you're making a spear?' is 'What's the matter? You see a black man with a pointed stick and it automatically gotta be a spear?' Made infuriating because, irregardless of race, what he has is, in fact, a spear. And apparently he doesn't know that the spear has been used by just about every culture since prehistory, with the bayonet turning even a modern rifle into a spear.
fluffything: While I enjoyed Cowboys and Aliens as a So Bad, It's Good action film, there is one glaring problem I have with it. At one point in the film, we find out the aliens are invading the earth because they want gold. Why do they want it? Because it's valuable. That's it. I'm sorry...what? It doesn't make sense for so many reasons. First, value is subjective and you need context to explain why it's valuable. Do the aliens use gold for fuel, money, building material, food, weapons? It's never explained. Second, if the aliens want gold, why not set up a trade system instead of invading the planet? Third, it contridicts the previous scenes since it implied earlier that the aliens are harvesting humans for some reason. Fourth (and related to third), it's stated that the aliens are abducting humans to find their weakness and exploit it. (Beat) Why?! These aliens are explicitly stated to be able to blow up entire planets with ease, and are also shown to be able to steal gold with little effort and without anyone noticing. It doesn't make any sense. These aliens can easily just siphon up all of the gold, blow up the earth, and be on their merry way without anyone knowing about it until it was too late. Them kidnapping people to study their "weakness" just overly-complicated an already stupid reason for invading earth.
Zaothus: In addition to the above points, there's also the blatant plotholes with regard to Daniel Craig's character's amnesia. It's revealed at the end of the film that the aliens subject all of their human captives to some sort of light that erases all of their memories, albeit temporarily. The presence of such a machine is an obvious contrivance, but not in itself a DMOS. That comes when Craig's character starts to overcome the amnesia and has flashbacks to his escape from the aliens, revealing what happened to his old love interest, how he got the mysterious device on his hand - all plot points that were played up as mysteries at the start of the film. But, I reiterate, this flashback is to his escape from the aliens, which is to say, after he was exposed to the mindfuck-light. So why would he have forgotten it at the beginning of the film? I have nothing inherently against amnesia as a plot device, but this is one of the most half-baked attempts at it I've seen in a long time. Considering the extent to which the film's marketing campaign focused on the whole "mystery" side of things, you'd think at some point in quality control they might have picked up on such a gargantuan continuity error.
Tropers/maxwellsilver: And even if you can get past that painful scene (McLain also says Glock is German when it is in fact Austrian and that it costs more than the chief of police makes in a month, when the Glock 17 retails for around $450), the plot hinges on planes sticking to their original destinations and never detouring to any of the six airports or the Air Force bases nearby when they can't land at Deluth, defying FAA regulations, or that their manipulation is stated to be the ILS system and changing it to display the planes' altitude as 200 feet lower... except the ILS uses antennas mounted ont he ground, and to do that they would have to be buried 200 feet underground, and would not change the altimeter readings, or the Windsor 114 crash, which explodes when it crashes and breaks up on the ground, which isn't possible due to the construction of a 747, and the fact it ran out of fuel means it wouldn't explode even if it did rupture.
fluffything: I already despise Simon Birch to begin with due to its copious amount of Glurge and because the titular character is a smug holier-than-thou Jerk Ass. But, to me, the absolute DMOS of that film is when Simon accidentally kills his friend's mother with a wayward baseball while playing a game. The circumstances that cause the whole thing are so contrived they'd be better off for an over-the-top comedy than what is supposed to be a Tear Jerker moment. Not to mention that it would be impossible for Simon to even be able to hit a baseball hard enough to kill a human being. It's just a forced way to make Simon (who is already an unlikeable character in my eyes) look sympathetic by accidentally causing a tragedy that would be, again, impossible for a person of his size to do. It's so utterly stupid that I still can't believe anyone would think it could be taken seriously.
fluffything: While Gremlins 2: The New Batch is a movie I really enjoy, there is one scene that always grinds my gears. That, of course, being the whole "Kate hates President's Day" speech. It's a parody of the "Kate hates Christmas because her father died" speech, but it fails miserably. First of all, her reasoning for hating President's Day? Some guy who looked like Abraham Lincoln freaked her out when she was a child. That's it. No over-the-top tragedy. Just a guy who looks like Lincoln. Second, there is no indication or build-up to this revelation apart from a single line Mr. Futterman says ("Washington never gave up. Lincoln never gave up."). At least the first film drops hints throughout the film that Kate dislikes Christmas and has legitimate (and very tragic reasons) for doing so. And, finally, parodying what I consider a major Tear Jerker scene from the first film is just downright Dude, Not Funny!. Yes, it was pretty over-the-top in terms of what happened. But, keep in mind that Kate's father died on Christmas, and quite horribly as well (IE: Getting stuck in a chimney and breaking his neck). Undermining such a heartbreaking revelation with a poorly-written "parody" of that scene is just mean spirited.
Blackbird Mizu: The Last Airbender was a lousy movie all around and did have a ton of DMOS. But one of the real kickers was the prison camp scene where earthbenders are imprisoned... on earth. And they don't even try to fight back until the Mighty Whitey heroes come in and give an rousing and inspirational speech. It made more sense in the TV series: they were stuck on a boat with no earth for a long time. There was plenty of time for them to be psychologically broken, so even when they were given weapons (some coal) they didn't bother fighting. But in the movie, they could've broken out the second they went in. It was completely moronic and you have to wonder who is dumber: the Fire Nation for imprisoning earthbenders on earth, or the earthbenders for not escaping.
RAD Dman: Along with the above, there are three things this troper would like to point out about the earthbender prison scene (yes, there is more to complain about besides the jaw-dropping, reality-bending stupidity of putting the prison for people with control over the earth on a location literally surrounded by and on top of miles of earth). In the show, the episode with this situation helps establish Katara as a motivator and inspirational character, a very important part of her personality. In the film, this integral aspect is ditched and Aang gives the rousing speech instead. There are plenty of cardboard characters in the movie, and this certainly does not help Katara's status as one of them. Furthermore, directly preceding the trio being taken to the prison, a firebender guard arrests a young earthbender because he "was bending small rocks" at them. The DMOS here is what he says after, in the most ridiculous whining voice ever: "It really hurt!" It's something that should be watched for one to understand how awful that dialogue is. The worst part about that is that if this were actually said in the series (and maybe it was, I don't recall), it would have been a genuinely funny joke. But because up to this point the movie was taking itself so obnoxiously seriously and all humor was replaced with brooding, this line just comes out of nowhere and leaves people laughing for the wrong reasons. Finally, when the earthbenders do their prison riot and start using the tons of earth around and under them as weapons, we are treated to a shot of six earthbenders doing an unintentionally comical choreographed series of actions accompanied by silly-sounding shouts. The routine is ten steps or so and the only result is that a small poorly-CG'd rock starts moving slowly past them. It is hammy, it looks stupid, and the lameness of the result is stupefying. That one scene is a DMOS for anything related to Avatar: The Last Airbender, not just the movie.
Dr Zulu 2010: Highlander: The Source was already an insult to the fans of the series, but the biggest middle finger of the franchise is the ending. In which Duncan managed to beat the Guardian not by decapitating him but by not attaking him while he's defenseless. Which allows him to gain the price which is the ability to have a baby. I'm not kidding. That actually means that all the good immortals and friends who died (Connor, Methos maybe, Joe and Reggie) died for nothing. Even worse, Anna outright says that there can be more than one immortal at the end. So yeah. Not only many immortals died pointlessly, they all died for a prize who is not worthy in the first place and can be earned not by violence but by love and being selfless. No wonder why the creator says it was all a nightmare by Duncan.
baconhead: I love David Zucker movies (except for this movie), I tolerated An American Carol up to certain point, and that is the court room, and what the movie tell us? That we need guns to kill ACLU lawyers! I'm not even joking about that last one, they flat out say we need guns to kill people who disagree with us on politics, what the.... I'm not even a pro-gun guy, and I could have made a better pro-gun argument, that's not funny, that's just Fascist.
SickBoy: Yeah, Zucker was always one of the best parody makers (second only to Mel Brooks in my opinion), but the ham-fisted political agenda in this movie, pretty much exemplified in that scene, drained him of his credibility. The whole scene can be summed up with this exchange: "We can't just shoot people!" "They're not people, they're the ACLU!" They even portray the ACLU lawyers as mindless zombies out to literally destroy the 10 Commandments by having them flock to the tablets in the courtroom and start wrecking them. They don't satirize anything silly the ACLU might have done, they don't offer any rebuttal to anything they disagree with, they just portray them as Too Dumb to Live and shoot them. The satire in this movie really started to shift into propaganda territory at that point.
romanatorX: Star Trek: Nemesis is not my favorite Trek Film, because it felt too similar to Wrath of Khan, but without the development and class that made WOK so good. The most triumphant example of this would have to be with Shinzon's character, who the writers intended to be like Khan, sympathy from audience and all. However, all attempts at sympathy for Shinzon were thrown out the window in the movie's worst moment..... Shinzon mind-rapes Troi, and it's played like a literal rape. I'm not saying that Khan did not do horrible things himself (he put mind-control parasites in Chekov's and Terrell's ears), but he did so as a means to an end: to get off of Ceti Alpha V. Shinzon, earlier in the film, was aroused by Troi. So, the rape scene does not move the plot in any major manor: it's just there to try and make Trek dark, and does so without class. That one scene basically put the franchise in a coma for 6.5 years.
Triassicranger: Data's death in Star Trek: Nemesis, which could have been avoided. How? Three words: Shuttles have transporters! Three more words: Emergency transporter armbands! (why that miniature transponder thingy was introduced at all is beyond me). Data could've just got Geordi to beam him over, send Picard back to the Enterprise, set a phaser to overload, chuck it at the Thalaron Emitter, hit the transporter armband, beam back to the ship and he would've avoided death. What makes it worse for this editor is that Data's actor of all people wrote the death scene. Urgh.
Averyvill Animation: It was very difficult for me to choose a true DMOS for Son of the Mask (One of my most hated movies). The painfully unfunny jokes, Jamie Kennedy's pitiful attempt at mimicking Jim Carrey's mask, the hideously poor CGI effects on the mask powered baby, the disgustingly sappy ending, the way they conveyed the "message", the many textbook examples of They Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot, but even with all those I've simply decided on one particular scene that made me despise this movie. Tim's wife Tonya returns home late at night and sees the house is a wreck, and then Tim appears. Thinking she's Loki in disguise (long story), Tim brutually assaults his wife, while intense music plays no less, with the dark lighting and atmosphere. Now, I'm not a guy who's easily offended, I tend to laugh at some pretty dark, brutal and mean spirited shit (I love the Pony.MOV series for Christ's sake), but, here I actually felt uncomfortable at the fact that this intense scene of what is basically domestic abuse was played for laughs. And not only is it expecting us to laugh at this horrifying scene, but, the sporadic tonal shift is also bothersome, as it feels like a completely different movie when you compare it to earlier scenes. It was more like something out of a psychological horror movie than the wacky surreal comedy this movie was attempting to be (Albeit poorly). It was right there, right there that I realized "This movie is despicable"!
Yahya: The moment in Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part I, when Grindelwald tells Voldemort where the Elder Wand is. Why?! Just why?! In the books, he didn't tell Voldie where it is because he knew he will loot Dumbledore's tomb, because, even after all these years, even after being defeated by Dumbledore, he still cared about the one who once was his friend. Not to mention that he is the only one in the entire series to laugh at Voldemort before his death. Way to screw up the character, here! I'm not a hardcore Harry Potter fan, and even I had a Flat "What." moment after this.
TacoNinja: The film version of Order of the Phoenix had a huge one that nearly ruined the rest of the films for my family. Professor Umbridge breaks into the Room of Requirement... No really, what the fuck?! The RoR is a room created and protected by very powerful magic, it cannot be fucking smashed into like a bank vault. This one moment even made this troper's mother write an angry letter decrying David Yates, the director of the last few movies, for making a load of stupid plot-holes and leaving out some of the really awesome parts in the book, like the extent of Fred and Georges' fucking with Umbridge.
k9feline5: For me, what makes that scene a DMOS is the ridiculous notion that LOTR fans would be so shocked and demoralized by someone making Frodo/Sam Ho Yay insults, they'd have no option but to vomit, as if LOTR fans had never heard gay hobbit jokes before. Any chance there were still LOTR fans out there that sheltered was dead by late 2004 (and Clerks2 came out in 2006, so no excuse there, Smith) with the release of the LOTR:Return of King Extended Edition DVD, which included a comedy sketch where Hollywood exectutives try to get Peter Jackson to make a LOTR sequel that would be all about Frodo/Sam Ho Yay. If Randall had made those Ho Yay jabs to Real Life LOTR fans, they'd most likely start quoting from that sketch.
Ecojosh1: I thought Star Trek: Generations was okay until the very end, when Picard buries Kirk under some rocks on an uninhabited planet. This is Captain Kirk, a man who should be buried at Starfleet headquarters. Plus, I'm sure plenty of people, like his friends and relatives, as well as people who started their careers under him, would want to attend his burial. It's such a bad way to say goodbye to a beloved character.
Sophie1322: The moment in Dark Shadows where Barnabas murders a bunch of hippies for absolutely no good reason at all. Now, to be clear, Barnabas was never the nicest of protagonists - he's killed innocent people before without being fazed by it in the slightest. But at least those murders were somewhat justifiable by extreme bloodlust. There is absolutely no excuse for this. Barnabas had been around humans for a while without harming anyone, and had plenty of opportunities to find safe alternatives for human blood, which he never once considers. He didn't even lose control, he calmly told them he was going to kill them all before doing so. I know that hippies are Acceptable Targets, but even these ones weren't portrayed as being bad people. On top of all that, it's Played for Laughs, and could have easily been removed from the film without affecting the story too much. After this scene, I found it completely impossible to like Barnabas.
Terror Toad: I Am Number Four, the film constantly bends over backwards to ensure that the Jerk Jock Mark is a complete Karma Houdini. Throughout the whole film, Mark gets away with everything. He and his buddies throw a football at Sam and laugh about it? Mark's friend gets hit when John throws it back, but Mark is unharmed. Mark is being a dick in the hallway to John? John does nothing. Mark is being a dick in the class? John does nothing. Mark is stalking Sarah? No one does anything. Mark puts paint bombs in John and Sam's lockers that explode on them when they open them up and cover all of their belongings in red paint, and then, when SAM finally has enough of Mark's crap and charges him and yells at the bully to leave him alone, Mark shoves him down and goes to attack him. What does John do? He.....pushes him lightly and then, despite having superpowers, pusses out and backs down, doing nothing to Mark while he mocks them and walks off laughing. The biggest dethroning moment? When Mark sends his cronies to outright attack John and kidnap Sarah, John tosses his cronies around, corners Mark, throws him down, grabs his arm annnnndd....pusses out of doing anything to the dick because Sarah says no. Mark continues to be a problem when he teams up with his cop dad to try and get them arrested and then the evil aliens show up and....scare him a little and drag him around a little bit. Yeah, real scary villains. Then, at the end of the movie, despite being an absolute bastard the entire film, Mark is easily forgiven by everyone and they depart as friends. This movie should have been titled I Am A Karma Houdini. Hell, Mark is quite possibly even worse in the book! On top of attacking people, he throws food at John and Sam at lunch, outright steals John's phone and even goes so far as to fill John and Sam's lockers with manure! And despite that, despite allll of that, John becomes friends with him at the end again. There are no repercussions for Mark's actions in either version. John should have beaten him to a bloody mess on the ground after what he did with the lockers, but nope! Let him slide! Both the film and the book suck and if the movie is ever remade, it had better involve John beating Mark bloody.
Saiyan Warrior 006: 300, ye gods what a mess. What with the way the Persians and Ephors are portrayed as deformed monsters (Immortals anyone?) to the buttering up of Spartans as heroic defenders of Justice who abhor slavery despite keeping three to five slaves themselves, but no the real Dethroning Moment to me is the way they excluded the rest of the Greek army who joined up with them. There was seven thousand Greeks total there facing off against the Persians in real life and in the film we only see a handful of those who aren't Spartan and they are portrayed as cowards afraid to fight and looked down upon as ready to flee at the first sign of trouble. Yeah when the odds were against them and it was hopeless they did withdraw but that was under an order to go tell Greece to prepare its army and there was over a thousand Thespians and Thebans who stayed behind as well and died fighting to the death alongside The Spartans. A scene with a group staying behind despite being told to leave would've been niced and a nod to what they did in real life. But nope, let's all pay attention to Leonidas.
fluffything: Reign of Fire: The way they defeat the dragons is so utterly idiotic, contrived, and utterly pisses in the face of basic biology that it makes a cheesy Godzilla film from the 70s look like a well-researched documentary in comparison. To put it bluntly, they kill the only male dragon (Yes, there is only a single solitary male within the entire dragon population) and that somehow makes it so that the female dragons are unable to breed and slowly die off. Quick question-How the fuck did these dragons manage to survive in the first place? This trait of the dragons is such an evolutionary flaw that they should've gone extinct long ago. Yes, it's true that many animal species live in groups with one male and several females. But, here's the thing, there's often other males of the species to mate with the females in case one male dies. Likewise, certain species of animal can change sex from male to female (or female to male) in order to breed. Or, heck, certain species of animal can reproduce via parthenogenesis (IE: A female is able to produce young without a male to fertilize the eggs). Considering all the numerous ways organisms in Real Life are able to find ways to reproduce and form new generations in order to survive, how is it that these dragons, which lack any said reproductive traits, and are wiped out so easily because of them, able to survive for so long? By this movie's logic, the singular male dragon could've simply died by choking on a bone and they would've gone extinct that way. Horrible writing at its worst.
Shadow200: Don't get me wrong I enjoyed Iron Man 3 and got my money's worth from it but the fact that his long time archnemesis from the comics The Mandarin turns out to be nothing but a washed up drug addict actor hired by the real Big Bad really doesn't settle with me. All the promos and interviews suggested he'd be Tony Stark's greatest foe and when its revealed he's drugged out of his mind and doesn't have a clue what's really going on irks me as I felt they wasted a perfectly good character and plot as their rivalry was based on technology vs magic and Advancement vs Tradition. Still enjoyed the movie but that part just bugs me.
Jaydude1992: From Iron Man 3 there's the final battle, between the Big Bad plus minions, who all have My Blood Runs Hot style powers, and all of Tony's suits being controlled by Jarvis. You'd think this would be a CMOA, particularly if you saw this bit in the trailer, but no. The Worf Effect is in full play as, rather than fight them at range with their repulsor rays, the suits get into punch-ups with the minions, whom the protagonists should know by now can give themselves body temperatures of around 3000 degrees celsius, and are frequently torn apart as a result. It really doesn't help that the earlier versions of the Iron Man armour were capable of taking on terrorist cells, squads of very similar armoured drones, and virtually everything the Chitauri could throw at them. The latest versions? They have trouble fighting men and women with superheated bodies.
Lady Stardust: Now i like Beyond the Black Rainbow and find it to be a very underrated movie but this moment bugs me. After Elena escapes Barry goes after her. Along the way, we see a couple of guys and in this scene the movie suddenly becomes a slasher film. Which is very jarring to how it was before and it just seemed like an excuse to have a bit more blood in the movie. Very unnecessary and out of nowhere.
Lady Stardust:Nice to see i'm not alone. I thought this character was fascinating and to see him thrown away like that was very disappointing
purplespooon: One of two characters in the whole franchise who should have been able to survive that, and he doesn't.
Alvarocasalino: I never liked very much the Twilight films. I never read the books, so I donīt know how faithful those adaptations are in comparison with its source material, but for me the ultimate DMOS in all those films is the resolution of the final battle in the second part of Breaking Dawn after all the boring buildup in the first part of Breaking Dawn there is finally a big battle against the Volturi where a lot of characters die fighting, where the Volturi finally got what they deserve and it almost seems that at least those movies were going to have some kind of proper resolution...Until is revealed that none of it was real. None of it mattered anyway. It was only a vision of the future which Alice shows to Aro. And finally there is no battle at the end and the Volturi just leave.Seriously, what the hell? So basically, all was just a huge buildup to nothing and instead of a proper Grand Finale we get a boring, corny scene with Edward and Bella in the meadow. Ugh.
Scarlet Nebula:Gamer. The film as a whole is rather poor but i can't list the whole movie so, the moment where you see Angie is being controlled by an obese man (and would be a possible rapist if not for his weight problem) who uses her for his disgusting desires. I knew from there what the film makers thought of anyone who played video games and it makes my stomach churn. What about female players? If i didn't know any better i'd think Jack Thompson wrote this script. To Neveldine and Taylor. Grow up.
Gess: The "soap drop in the shower" scene from I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry. The joke itself is rather stupid if you think of it, but as stupid, offhand gay jokes go, meh, there are worse ones. So if they just mentioned it, or used it as a short gag, then ok, no harm done. But they build a whole scene around it, a lengthy, really intense scene, where everybody involved (adult men, mind you) treat this stupid situation completely seriusly, with apprehension and distress that befits not so much a prison shower scene, but an encounter with an actual predator. It is like they were going to make fun of that dumb short joke, but then forgot and played it as, ugh, straight as possible.
taylorkerekes: Alright, I'm pretty sure most people are gonna disagree with me, but while Joyful Noise is a lousy movie all around, the one moment in that film that has really left a scar on my heart is the infamous scene in the hotel where Queen Latifah delivers a strong parental rant towards Keke Palmer. Now while I get that it was trying to convey the concept of real inner beauty and how we should always honor our parents, the way Queen delivers that rant is just harsh and abusive. How, you ask? Think about it: the slap, the condescending remarks about "hanging mirrors all over the house" and giving yourself CPR (which may I add is impossible!), and telling her to respect her snoring ("You treat my snoring like it's a Marvin Gaye love song!")... are you kidding me?! What kind of parenting do you call that?! Do you have any idea how wrong that all sounds?! You don't slap your own teenage daughter in the face! And do you honestly think that hanging mirrors around the house just so you can look at yourself all the time will help prove anything?! Finally, telling your child to respect your snoring is just petty, because 1.) it's condescending and petty, and 2.) it does not come from exhaustion! Bottom line is, of all the crap Joyful Noise has to offer, this scene alone is the biggest mistake they made! If there's any advice I could offer to parents out there, it's to never take a tip from Queen Latifah's character in this movie! It isn't good Christian parenting, it's practically outright demonic!
Garfield2710: Uwe Boll's Assault on Wall Street borders on being awful and even potentially dangerous. The film starts off slow and melodramatic, but nothing really horrible in it. There's a cop who loses all his money when the housing bubble burst, (from mistakes that he made that I should add), and then spends the rest of the film trying to figure out what to do. However, when his wife kills herself, he then decides to go on a rampage, killing anyone who was involved with him going broke. Never mind the fact that he lost his money because he was being stupid with his investments, the film is basically advocating ignoring responsibility for your own mistakes, and killing the people involved vigilante style. However, regardless of how dumb that was, I was still with it, and could even see it as being a good cathartic film if that's your cup of tea. However, the film completely lost any semblance of logic or reason when the main character goes on a final shooting spree where he kills people on Wall Street who were not remotely involved with him at all. Except for one guy he happened to pass who he found out had a pregnant wife. One guy out of 50 men and women. All of whom probably had families of their own. Then the film cements itself as a true atrocity, when after the cops come and arrest him, his friends (who fully know what he did) remove the handcuffs and let him go. After he murdered dozens of innocent people. And we're supposed to agree with this. Screw, this, movie!