* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: There is a theory that Kate doesn't genuinely submit to Petruchio but is putting on an act and merely becomes shrewd to get her way with her husband. Supporting this is how Kate doesn't gradually become submissive but, almost in exasperation, just starts agreeing with him in a completely unrealistic way, and [[SilkHidingSteel this behavior gets Petruchio to do what]] ''she'' wants. (Thus learning the very lesson he's trying to teach: one catches more flies with honey than with vinegar.)
** Another one: Petruchio is lampooning society (specifically gender roles) throughout the play; the "taming" is really him trying to get Kate to play along with him without having to drop the joke by telling her in front of other people. (Crucial bit to reading this: in that scene where Kate starts to go along with him, "moon" and "sun" are metaphors for Petruchio).
** Another: Petruchio's act is meant to show Kate how ridiculous her behavior must seem. She eventually catches on to this and the rest of the play is a prank on everybody else.
** Yet another, for the last monologue, though it requires some side gags: Kate gets in on the bet and delivers the last monologue to get her and Petruchio the money.
** The alternate alternate character interpretation is that Shakespeare means what he says and that attempts to read the play as "subversive" are a product of the modern audience's discomfort with the story.
** And for that matter, the alternate alternate alternate character interpretation (whew!) is that Shakespeare was being sexist but FairForItsDay, because Kate's last speech does not say only "wives submit to your husbands" but rather "wives submit to your husbands ''because they have your best interests at heart''"
*** Another FairForItsDay interpretation would note that there were other contemporary plays in this genre (taming a bad wife), only they solved the problem by [[DomesticAbuser beating the wife into submission]]. You know, [[ValuesDissonance comedy]]! Shakespeare's version doesn't seem that bad in comparison...
** Another one: It's a FamilyUnfriendlyAesop ("It's only okay to be rude to people if they're weaker than you are," which is essentially the lesson Kate learns in the end) PlayedForLaughs.
** Gregory Doran's 2003 RSC production played Petruchio as a genuine madman driven to distraction by his father's death and Kate as a troubled woman who loves him enough to accept him the way he is, turning the whole play into a story about mutual support under difficult circumstances.
** In terms of more minor characters, the 1992 RSC production drastically reimagined Tranio as a manipulator trying to steal Bianca for himself. In the end Lucentio wins thanks to some words of warning from Biondello, but a BittersweetEnding ensues as Bianca still loves Tranio.
** Surprisingly, both male and female readers, viewers and audience members have viewed Kate as a woman who needs to learn humility.
** Yet another alternative: Petruchio is playing a game of [[MyRuleFuIsStrongerThanYours contract chicken]] with Kate. Back in the day, the standard marital exchange was that the man would provide for and protect his wife, and the woman would respect/obey her husband and put out for him. Kate is refusing to show respect for Petruchio, so he is simply declining to fulfill his side of the "contract". In his estimation, it's only a matter of time before she blinks, and she will before he does. Once she shows signs that she understands it now, he softens considerably toward her.
** There is also another theory (link [[http://notalwayslearning.com/misogynist-versus-masochist/32448 here]]) that Kate and Petruchio are doing a rudimentary [=BDSM=] routine. It helps that immediately after Kate finished her final speech about being a slave and submitting utterly (DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything), they went straight to bed.
* AngstWhatAngst: PlayedForLaughs in the Induction. When the Lord's servants tell Christopher Sly that he's been "in a dream" for fifteen years, he responds, "Fifteen years? By my fay, a goodly nap!" Upon being told that everyone he knew never existed, he adds, "Now, Lord be thanked for my good amends!"
* FairForItsDay: Many complain about the ending, but in historical context Shakespeare was writing in a time when women were just beginning to be treated like ''human beings'' rather than the property of men. The character of Kate was pushing the boundaries of what was acceptable in society, so some agree that Shakespeare added the themes of female submissiveness to appease his audience.
* MagnificentBastard: Petruchio
* RuleAbidingRebel: The play is praised by some as a proto-feminist work. Kate's speech at the end is taken by them to be ironic. It is likely not.
* ValuesDissonance: Even the most subversive and proto-feminist interpretations can't make all of the sexism palatable to modern audiences. And if you don't read it as subversive--if you take the text at face value, as a story of a domineering man breaking a woman to his will and turning her into a submissive -- the Values Dissonance is cranked UpToEleven.
* ValuesResonance: Modern series such as the ''Fifty Shades'' and ''Submissive'' trilogies (written in the 21st century) also tell the story of a domineering man turning a woman into his submissive, and modern female readers apparently love them.
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack
----