{{Ununnilium}}: Removed the not-yet-aired-in-the-US DoctorWho ref.

{{Gus}}: Preserved here (spoiler fonted):
[[spoiler:Doctor Who: "The Greatest Show in the Galaxy" featured a lycanthropic girl who could be forced to transform by nothing more than an "old devil moon" stage lamp gel. A society of werewolves also appears in the Big Finish audio Loups-Garoux (in which the Doctor notes that "There are so many forms of lycanthrophy," presumably to avoid any problems with continuity). And there was yet another werewolf in the new season this time it was meant as Queen Victoria's assasian.]]

MorganWick: Actually, most of that is non-spoilery and is in fact still in the entry. Only the last sentence, which Seth added, seems to be removed, and I think it's been moved to DoctorWhoNewSeriesTropes anyway (albeit with only a link to the page).

{{Ununnilium}}: Indeed.

{{Seth}} Sorry didn't know the US airing i saw that episode ages ago, worth putting something like "Werewolves make an appearancein the new series episode Tooth and Claw" or just leave it?

{{Ununnilium}}: Just leave it. In the future, put any tropes in episodes that haven't shown yet in the US in DoctorWhoNewSeriesTropes; at the moment, that's everything from "The Christmas Invasion" forward.

LickyLindsay: I remember the term "Werewolf" being used in ''The Silmarillion'', but I can't remember what it referred to.

{{arromdee}}: Incidentally, I did not intentionally remove the three webcomic items; I'm not sure what happened.
-----
{{Semi-Known Troper}}: Have moved the discusion of werewolf-characteristcs over to OurWerewolvesAreDifferent. Does anyone have any ideas as to how to differenciate the two pages furthur (if it comes down to a cut, the new page is definatly superior)?

AnonymousMcCartneyfan: If this page survives the move to cut it, it ''should'' be what standard werewolves are like--the archetypical variety. We have both a {{Dracula}} page and an OurVampiresAreDifferent page; why can't we have both a Wolfman page, describing the classic Wolf Man variants, and an OurWerewolvesAreDifferent page?

----

{{Nornagest}}: Cut the natter from the following:

-->* ''[[http://alphaluna.net/ Alpha Luna]]''! The 57th best werewolf comic on the internet! Go read it now!
-->**Alright, who changed my "best werewolf comic on the internet" quote to "57th best werewolf comic on the internet" as a {{TakeThat}}? Just because it rarely updates doesn't mean it's bad. I like it <:( .

First, 57th, I don't care. The example fits, but the only part of it that matters is the link.
----
AnonymousMcCartneyfan: Yikes. I don't want this article cut, especially not after seeing how many examples it's accumulated, but both it and OurWerewolvesAreDifferent need editing. (I'd think better about the CutList proposal if the fella doing the entry had spelled OurWerewolvesAreDifferent correctly - but not much.)

Prfnoff: I'm against cutting this article. OurWerewolvesAreDifferent suggests that it's a specific kind of werewolf, but the current description for WolfMan is too generic. To help make WolfMan less about the generic werewolf stuff, I shifted its last two paragraphs to OurWerewolvesAreDifferent. WolfMan still NeedsABetterDescription, but I don't know quite where to draw the line...

MetaFour: I also think this page should be kept.

{{Rebochan}}: I'm for keeping this page too. WolfMan is a really specific archetype that should be separate.

{{Zenoseiya}}: The two pages should be merged. What is the difference exactly? It's the difference between JapaneseVampire and OurVampiresAreDifferent (the tropes both follow the exact same rules, that is, all vampires are different). As it is, there is nothing that separates them other than writer fiat (they both have the exact same level of generic-ness).