Um...I just added fake vandalism to this page before I read this and saw you removed it before. (I should have realised I wouldn't have been the first person to think of it) But come on, its inoffensive and pretty funny. BARBERA STREISAND! is a reference to south park the movie, how can that not be funny? This way it counts as a self demonstrating article. C,mon people! It's such an obvious joke! I realise you moderators must have a natural hatred of vandalism (as do we all), but you shouldn't let your predjudice get in the way of a good gag, its what seperates us from the animals. (And by "animals" I mean Wikipedia.)

FastEddie: pulled ...
[[foldercontrol]]

[[folder: 80\/\/ |)0\/\/|\| 83f0| 23 y0| || 2 |\/|4573| 2 ]]

... as being just way too obscure to be funny, if that was the intention.

LooneyToons: What was obscure about that? It took me a moment to decode, but...?

FastEddie: Bow down before your master? It seems like the funny is missing. Either you can't get it ... not funny ... or you got ''way'' tired of 'lete speak back in the 80's and ... not funny. Could just be me. Cranky pants.

LordSeth: Hey, who removed the hilarious fake wiki vandalism in this page? (not the aforementioned one, there was another)

*{{yinyang107}}: Would you be referring to "LOL VABNALIZED"?

WVI: Same question. I don't see the problem. It was funny and it was harmless. Edit: I reverted it on the grounds that humor is absolutely necessary. Time for an edit war!

FastEddie: All for humour, but that just looks juvenile, which begets juvenile. Maybe something actually funny would work, or maybe there just isn't anything inherently funny about vandalism. Especially lately.

WVI: Hey, I thought it was funny. And hell, juvenile? Our standards aren't exactly, [[ThatOtherWiki uh]]...

Chariset: Awww... you took out my opening quotation...

WVI: Well, there you have it. TV Tropes Is Anti-Fun.

ninjacrat: We also hate freedom!

TheAdvertisementServer: SECONDED, PATHETIC HUMAN.