->''"I sued Verizon, 'cause I get all depressed any time my cell phone is roaming.\\
I sued Colorado, 'cause you know, I think it looks a little bit too much like Wyoming!\\
I sued Neiman Marcus, 'cause they put up their Christmas decorations way out of season.\\
I sued Creator/BenAffleck ... aww, do I even need a '''reason'''?!"''
-->-- '''Music/WeirdAlYankovic''', [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeXQBHLIPcw "I'll Sue Ya"]]

Alice is idling herco car out of the driveway when she accidentally bumps into a stranger, Bob. "Ow, my back!" Bob exclaims. "The pain is immeasurable! I'll sue you! I'll sue!"

Someone — usually a stranger, sometimes a friend, occassionally an enemy — has decided to sue Alice in the wake of some minor accident. The plaintiff suffered no real injury, but is suing out of {{greed}} or perhaps a desire for {{revenge}}, often with the help of an AmbulanceChaser or otherwise AmoralAttorney. If the judge doesn't laugh the guy out of court, though, our hero must often resort to some variety of CourtroomAntic to discredit her adversary.

The classic sitcom lawsuit is almost always a tort action: the plaintiff is claiming the defendant's negligence harmed them in some way, and is demanding monetary compensation. The actual injury sustained is always minuscule and the amount of damages claimed has to be at least five times what the hero earns in a year. The complaint itself is often just plain silly, such as suing Pizza Hut because the X-Treme Meatsa-Treatsaria did not truly deliver "gut-busting meat flavor" as promised.[[note]]"The meat flavor left my gut ''completely intact'', your honor!"[[/note]]

Technically, a frivolous lawsuit is one brought in bad faith — i.e., brought with no intention, expectation, or ''chance'' of success. Within the legal system, calling an action frivolous is like calling the lawyer who brought it a certified loon, the legal equivalent of "not even wrong". Much more common are frivolous claims in otherwise reasonable lawsuits and frivolous courtroom motions that only serve to prolong the legal process and harass participants. Another common instance is the lawsuit that, while it is ''technically'' not frivolous because it is based on actionable legal fact, said actionable legal fact ''is'' hair-splitting, petty, and a ViolationOfCommonSense (e.g. a ten million dollar suit filed against a restaurant for not putting ketchup on a burger advertised as having ketchup on it -- it ''is'' technically false advertising[[note]]In which the product you describe must accurately fit the product you sell, unless adequately disclaimed or clearly exaggerated[[/note]] and therefore legally factual and actionable,[[note]]It is also theoretically actionable under sales law, which is somewhat different from the false advertising laws; note that because the sale of a hamburger is a sale of goods and the purchaser of the hamburger is the end user (rather than a commercial reseller), the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_tender_rule perfect tender rule]] applies: if the seller's product diverges one iota from what the buyer can reasonably expect based on the seller's representations, the buyer is entitled to damages and to return the product. That said, you ''do'' have to return it in salable condition, i.e. intact, not with bites taken out, so this is purely theoretical unless you open your burger before eating it and also are enough of a dick to sue when you find no ketchup instead of going up to the counter and just asking for it. Even then, the seller will be able to argue -- possibly successfully -- that because you ''touched'' the burger you got whatever bugs or dirt you may have had on your hands on the burger, therefore making the sandwich no longer fit for resale and thus denying you that remedy. Additionally, although (again) you are technically entitled to damages, you are limited to the value of the burger as if it had been as warranted (which would be the amount you paid for it, at most) minus the value as delivered (without ketchup, so at much a few cents lower -- ketchup is cheap), making it impossible to recover very much -- less than the cost of filing a lawsuit in the first place.[[/note]] but is the lack of a free packet of ketchup you could apply yourself worth ten million dollars?).

The majority of the truly outrageous examples you might have heard of are filed ''pro se'', without an attorney. That's because none want to touch the craziness with a ten-foot pole. If there's an actual attorney involved who isn't also their own client[[note]]"A man who is his own attorney has AFoolForAClient."[[/note]] the case might not be so frivolous as it first appears. This is particularly common in personal injury, where "only paid if you win" is the standard; the prospect of eating the cost of an unsuccessful case forces attorneys to be very selective about the cases they take, ergo they're not going to take something unless they have very good reason to believe that it will be determined in their favor.

Finally, yet another common lawsuit confused with the Frivolous Lawsuit that may or may not be ''technically'' frivolous is the SLAPP -- [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation]], used to censor or intimidate people into withdrawing truthful accusations/statements, not releasing proof of corruption/wrongdoing, or otherwise silencing people. The ChurchOfHappyology is ''absolutely notorious'' for this practice (to the point that almost all parodies of it include it), and it's often a favored tactic of the CorruptCorporateExecutive and the occasional celebrity caught in major wrongdoing, where it may overlap with the StreisandEffect.

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b) or its equivalent in a court system that has one, anyone signing a paper to be filed in court is representing to the court that they have made "an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances...." Violation of Rule 11(b) can lead to sanctions, either upon motion by the other party or on the court's own initiative.

In real life, actual frivolous lawsuits will be over long before they get near an actual jury. Repeated filing of frivolous lawsuits, frivolous claims, and frivolous motions will often be met with "contempt of court" charges. Moreover, attorneys have been disbarred for excessive frivolous filings (granted, it takes a ''long'' history of accepting worthless cases, making pointless and abusive appeals, and generally pissing everyone off to make them even consider it; bar associations are fairly reluctant to go that far and will ''never'' jump straight to disbarment before making use of letters of reprimand, sanctions, and suspensions first).

Likewise, litigants known for repeatedly bringing them can be labeled by the courts as "vexatious" and enjoined from ever filing another without getting court approval first (like disbarment, you ''really'' have to fuck up before they'll even consider labeling you as vexatious due to a general reluctance to keep someone from having their day in court. It takes a whole lot of abusive, ridiculous claims, worthless appeals, bad courtroom behavior, unpaid fines, and general egregious misbehavior to get them to even think about forcing you to permanently leave them alone). Even if none of this happens, the case (and others like it) can be banned from itself ever being filed again, at least in both the US and Japanese court systems, if it is summarily dismissed with prejudice[[note]]Dismissal "with prejudice" simply means that as a matter of law, what you say in your complaint can't actually be used as the basis of a lawsuit. This is the usual way in which many lawsuits end for entirely non-frivolous reasons: if you're trying out a legitimate but untested legal theory, or if it turns out that the defendants have a defense of which you were unaware or which you were aware but weren't counting on the judge buying so quickly, your case will be dismissed with prejudice and there's no shame in it.[[/note]] which may or may not go as far as the judge calling it frivolous, but is a strong warning to the parties and lawyers involved that trying it or a similar case again ''will'' put them at risk of the more severe consequences such as contempt charges, disbarring for attorneys involved, and the like.

Often this trope is invoked to make an argument about UsefulNotes/TortReform, i.e. limiting the ability to file claims or capping the liable amount of damages. On the one hand, everyone can agree that there sure seem to be a lot of unnecessary cases brought to court, which takes up both time and money that can be better spent. On the other hand, it's hard to argue that the mere fact that someone with an illegitimate claim asks for a ludicrous amount of money means that someone with a legitimate claim should have their legal recourse limited. Particularly since -- in the United States at least -- most defendants in tort cases insist on a jury trial, and the ''jury'' is responsible both for determining fault and deciding the amount of damages to award (if any). Furthermore, many 'outrageous' jury awards are reduced following the inevitable appeal.

Subtrope of HilaritySues. A lawyer who goes after tort claims is called an AmbulanceChaser.


[[folder: Anime and Manga]]
* Kaede from ''Manga/SayonaraZetsubouSensei'', [[PlayingWithATrope intentionally]] a [[EagleLand walking American stereotype]], threatens to sue everyone she sees for ridiculous things. Most often, the offense is a person [[PantyShot seeing her panties]] when she kicks them, leading Meru to describe her as "{{fanservice}}y". As a bonus in the manga, every volume has faux legal documents of her charges from that issue. Most of the time, they are wildly exaggerated.

[[folder:Comic Book]]
* [[ComicBook/DisneyDucksComicUniverse Scrooge McDuck]] once crashed a plane, and a man who had nothing to do with this threw himself at the wreckage and sued Scrooge for [[EleventyZillion one "maximajillion"]] dollars. This is so large that it exceeds what Scrooge, who at one point had three cubic money bins each over 20 stories tall, expected to make ''over his lifetime''. Scrooge himself is portrayed in many stories as being ''the richest person in the world'', which makes the amount appear even more ludicrous.
* Played with in ''ComicBook/UltimateSpiderMan''. After Peter Parker is bitten and receives his powers, he begins to stand up for himself more, eventually refusing to take crap from JerkJock Flash Thompson. Flash responds by challenging Peter to a fight and, not knowing his own strength, Peter easily breaks his hand. Flash's family demand the Parkers pay his medical bills for the incident or they'll sue, ignoring the fact that Flash had been beating up Peter for years and he was the one who instigated the fight.
** For added bitterness, earlier in the volume, the spider bite made Peter ill enough to go to a hospital, and Oscorp wound up sending the Parkers a gift basket and footed the bill out of fear that they'd sue the company. Uncle Ben later explains he knew it was an accident and Peter wound up fine a few days later, so he'd never consider suing.
** Later still, Norman Osborn, once he discovers what the spider bite did to Peter, toys with the idea of suing his family. His reasoning: The spider was Oscorp property, along with everything the spider produced. Peter has the spider's venom in his blood. Ergo, Peter has stolen Oscorp property.
* One issue of the ''Franchise/ArchieComics'' had a man intentionally get rear-ended by Veronica so he could sue her. It took Archie, Chuck, and a ZanyScheme to prove that the man had orchestrated the entire thing.
** Another story had a burglar sue Archie's family after he injured himself tripping on Archie's skateboard ''while trying to burglarize the Andrews' home''. (Naturally, Archie's family was outraged.) It took Dilton Doiley finding an obscure loophole in an very old, forgotten (but not repealed) law to pull the family out.

[[folder:Films -- Animated]]
* A string of these set off the plot of ''WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles''. After one man wins a lawsuit blaming Mr. Incredible for injuries incurred while ''saving his life'' (since said man was trying to commit suicide), so many people follow that all superheroes are forced into retirement and hiding.

[[folder:Films -- Live-Action]]
* In the ''Series/BabylonFive'' MadeForTVMovie ''River of Souls'', a holographic entertainment operator attempts to sue the station with the help of an AmbulanceChaser who Captain Lochley refers to in those exact terms. At the end she takes great pleasure at informing him that, since the business in question was destroyed in the course of the film's events, the grievance was now a moot point and he'd be going home empty-handed. Add to that, part of the lease agreement the owner signed waived rights to sue if damage is done to his property during the course of protecting the station itself, which Lochley has a dozen affidavits attesting to this fact.
* OlderThanTheyThink entry: Film/TheThreeStooges try their hands at this once they hear of someone slipping in a hotel lobby and suing for thousands (this is before 1950, folks). [[SpringtimeForHitler Naturally, they find ways to fail at pratfalling]] before they find the owner of the hotel is herself impoverished.
* The plot of the film ''Film/TheManWhoSuedGod''. The main character is a fisherman whose boat is destroyed by lightning, but he isn't allowed to claim damages from his insurance company because the lightning was "an act of God." So he sues {{God}}. (God is represented in court by clergymen.) In the end, [[spoiler:the main character drops his lawsuit, but his efforts aren't in vain since he's won a moral victory. The clergymen then announce that they'll be suing the insurance companies for unauthorised use of their Lord's name.]]
* In ''Film/LiarLiar'', Creator/JimCarrey plays Fletcher Reede, an unscrupulous lawyer who, it is implied, specializes in these sorts of cases. One scene also cites the famous UrbanLegend of the burglar who injures himself trying to break into a house and successfully sues the homeowner (in the film, it really happened -- to a friend/relative of Fletcher's secretary).

* In ''Literature/MySistersKeeper'', one thing that attracts Anna to come to the Attorney Campbell to sue for bodily emancipation is Campbell's involvement in a case where a boy sued God for his injury.
* This is the background to the toad in the ''Literature/{{Discworld}}'' novel ''Discworld/TheWeeFreeMen''. He was a lawyer who was employed by a woman to sue her fairy godmother, on the grounds she was promised health, wealth and happiness, and didn't feel particularly happy one day. The godmother's response was to [[BalefulPolymorph turn him into a toad, and his client into a small hand mirror]]. The worst part, he says, was when the judge applauded.
** This seems to be a common thing for magic-users, according to ''Discworld/GoingPostal'':
-->'''Archchancellor Ridcully''': Oh, ''please'' sue the University. We've got a whole ''pond'' full of people who tried to sue the University!
* Mr. Frankland, a minor character in ''Literature/TheHoundOfTheBaskervilles'', liked to sue people as a way of showing off his knowledge of law, including the more obscure points. He was particularly proud of getting one man convicted of trespassing '''on his own property'''.
* Albert Haddock sometimes started these in AP Herbert's ''Misleading Cases in the Common Law''. The intent was for Herbert to demonstrate how preposterous the law was, and it was sometimes suggested that that was why [[AuthorAvatar Haddock]] was doing it as well.
* In ''Literature/AdrianMole: The Cappuccino Years'', Adrian's mother sues a shoe shop because the stilettos she bought there fell apart ''while she was climbing a mountain in them''. To Adrian's surprise, she wins the case, when her lawyer successfully argues that the shop ("Shoe Mania!") should have removed the exclamation mark from its name so as not to excite hormonal middle-aged women into making rash purchases.
* ''Literature/TheBible''
--> ''Isaiah 59:4'': No one enters suit justly; no one goes to law honestly; they rely on empty pleas, they speak lies, they conceive mischief and give birth to iniquity.
* {{Deconstructed}} in the ''Literature/DiogenesClub'' short story "Clubland Heroes", which first portrays the [[MeaningfulName meaningfully named]] Peeter Blame as a petty man, constantly threatening legal action for trivial reasons, and by the end shows him as someone who was ''absolutely justified'' in many of his complaints, and was driven to despair by increasing evidence that while the law was on his side, the legal system wasn't.
* The trial in ''Literature/AnnieOnMyMind'' is this through and through. The entire reason [[spoiler:Liza and the two teachers are brought to trial is because a homophobic teacher catches Liza and Annie in Ms. Winthrop and Ms. Stevenson's house. The teachers lose their jobs, but the school trustees call the trial ludicrous and fire the corrupt principal.]]
* The protagonist of ''Literature/TheDresdenFiles'' spent years dealing with harassing lawsuits from Larry Fowler after blowing out most of his talk show's electronics. Given that the only way to find him guilty was for a judge to accept the existence of magic, this mainly served to drain Dresden's bank accounts.
** This is possibly an [[InvertedTrope inversion]] of the usual way this trope is played, since the lawsuit is ''legally'' frivolous but ''morally'' quite sound; Harry's magic really ''did'' blow out all the electronics and cause some very expensive damage, and Harry went into the talk show knowing the risk of this but decided to go in anyway, and he (obviously) didn't give Fowler due warning that he was a real-life wizard who carried a high risk of accidentally destroying all the electronics. Based on this, Fowler actually seems quite justified in wanting compensation.
*** However, in a further complication, Fowler himself presumably doesn't believe in magic, so to the best of his knowledge he ''is'' launching a FrivolousLawsuit against Harry, and his accusations just happen to be true.
* One minor character in the Carl Hiassen novel ''Striptease'' spends the entire book trying to arrange things so he can start one with some wealthy person/organization just so he can be given a large cash settlement to shut up. In the last chapter, he gets into a minor car accident on land owned by a sugar company and sues the property owners, claiming wildly exaggerated injuries.
* The WhiteDwarfStarlet actor Frederick Faversham in Creator/GKChesterton's ''Paradoxes of Mr Pond'' story "The Crime of Captain Gahagan".
--> He was now forgotten in the theatre and remembered only in the law-courts. A dark and crabbed man, still haggardly handsome, he had become famous, or familiar, as a sort of permanent litigant. He was eternally bringing actions against people whom he charged with trivial tricks and distant and disputable wrongs: managers and rivals and the rest.

[[folder:Live Action TV]]
* ''Series/TheGoldenGirls'': Blanche gets in a minor accident driving Rose's car and the man she rear ended sues Rose.
* ''Series/TheBradyBunch'' was once sued by a man who claimed whiplash in the wake of a collision with the Brady family car. His case was discredited in court when Mike deliberately dropped his briefcase on the floor behind the guy, whose prompt and obviously painless spin in place to face the noise demonstrated just how real his injuries were.
* In a possible case of a RecycledScript, a similar episode appeared on ''Series/ThePartridgeFamily'', which ran on the same network in the following timeslot.
* The second season of ''Series/JoanOfArcadia'' featured the title character's family being sued for "emotional damages" by the boy who caused the accident that paralyzed Joan's older brother. The lawsuit was dropped abruptly after an extended {{arc}}, and the character in question was never seen again.
* ''Series/MalcolmInTheMiddle''[='=]s evil grandma does this after slipping on a leaf on the main character's front porch. She is forced to back down when her lawyer [[AmoralAttorney meets the family and decides that even if they took the family for everything his cut of the profits wouldn't be as much as he wanted.]]
* In an episode of ''Coach'', Luther sues Hayden after burning his mouth on a hot-off-the-grill bratwurst at Hayden's barbecue. He nearly wins the lawsuit; however, the judge eventually decides that, as Hayden is merely a tenant, he is not liable; the owner of the property is. Since the owner is Luther's girlfriend and both men's boss, he immediately drops the suit before the verdict is officially announced.
* Played with a bit on ''Series/MarriedWithChildren''. After Bud and Kelly get into a fender bender with a Mercedes, Al bemoans society's litigiousness. But when Bud tells Al that the other guy was at fault, he immediately [[HypocriticalHumor decides to sue]], and has the children play up the severity (read: existence) of their injuries in court.
** In another episode, a burglar broke into the Bundy family home while Al was asleep on the couch. As Al woke up, he accidentally touched the burglar on the behind, before realizing what was going on and pummeling the burglar. He was later sued by the burglar for "sexual harassment" and being unable to "work", claiming that Al's punch ruined his career as a burglar, greatly exaggerating his injuries, this along with obvious signs that the burglar's attorney was having a relationship with the judge, and even tried to shake Al's hand with the one in said sling after he won. However, Al got the last laugh when he decked the burglar again, and won a Frivolous Lawsuit of his own by claiming [[WhyDidYouMakeMeHitYou he hurt his hand on the burglar's face]].
** In another episode, a thief entered the shoe store where Al works and Jefferson suggested Al could sue the mall for four million dollars, claiming the incident made him afraid of shoes. The mall sent an investigator who kept an eye on Al. To make matters worse, Al's bowling team were finalists in a tournament and the bowling hall wouldn't let him play barefoot because the last one to do so there sued the place for three million dollars. Eventually, Al decided [[spoiler:[[HonorBeforeReason the championship was more important than money]]]].
** In another episode, Peggy sees a TV ad about a lawyer who helped a woman to get 2.5 million dollars from her husband for asking her to cook. Peggy tries it with Al by volunteering to cook but Al is so focused on some idea he refuses the offer and the lawsuit idea goes unmentioned for the rest of the episode.
** Jefferson once fell inside Al's workplace when a wall gave in. Jefferson's claims of injury ended as soon as Al stated they had no insurance.
* An episode of ''Series/CSINewYork'' revolved around the murder of a woman who ''made a living'' from multimillion-dollar Frivolous Lawsuits (for reasons many of which are implied to have been set up by herself). The murderer turns out to be a chef whose life she had completely destroyed and had recently gotten back on his feet... only for him to see her getting ready to pull the same stunt again at his new place of business. [[SympatheticMurderer You almost feel bad for the guy.]]
** Oh, and her personal AmbulanceChaser is played by Wayne "[[Series/{{Seinfeld}} Hello Newman]]" Knight.
* ''Series/{{Seinfeld}}'' had the AmbulanceChaser Jackie Chiles (an obvious parody of Johnnie Cochran) in at least three cases of this. Every time, he wound up humiliated due to Kramer acting stupid and ignoring his legal advice.
** In "The Postponement", Kramer sues a coffee chain for burning himself with hot coffee. In the next episode "The Maestro", we meet Jackie Chiles for the first time as Kramer settles the case for free coffee for life, passing up a large cash award in his stupidity.
-->'''Company Representative''': We're prepared to offer you free coffee for life, and--\\
'''Kramer''': I'll take it!
** In "The Caddy", Kramer and Elaine sue a woman for "[[DistractedByTheSexy distracting]]" Kramer while he was driving because she was wearing only a bra top. Jackie Chiles' remark that a bra has to fit "like a glove" is a reference to the O.J. Simpson trial. Kramer's stupidity was again the cause of losing this case, since Jackie had it in the bag when he insisted on checking to see if the bra would fit her.
** In another episode, Kramer turns his apartment into a cigar bar/smoking room, and the cumulative effects of hours upon hours of concentrated smoke make his skin pallid. They sue the tobacco companies and settle for making Kramer the new Marlboro Man.
* Archie Bunker tries to cook up a whiplash suit in "Oh My Aching Back", a first-season episode of ''Series/AllInTheFamily''. Because of his unambiguous prejudices, he also insists on having a Jewish lawyer. He gets one, but said lawyer senses the case isn't kosher, and bails.
* An episode of ''Series/BabylonFive'' has a short skit where a man sues a Vree (aliens that look like [[TheGreys Greys]] and whose ships are [[FlyingSaucer flying saucers]]) because the Vree's great-grandfather abducted the man's great-grandfather and conducted experiments on him. The judge laments under his breath that he always seems to get these sort of cases.
** Even more amusingly (from the things the judge says), it seems that there's actually a treaty between the Vree government and the Earth Alliance that governs exactly such cases, meaning that these cases must happen ''all the time'' in the ''B5'' universe.
** According to fluff, the Vree aren't the ones doing the abducting. It was most likely the Vorlons and the Streib (who look similar to the Vree but don't have flying saucers).
*** In this specific case, the man claimed to have found records proving it was the ancestor of the specific Vree he was suing.
* Steve Bosell from ''Series/ThePhilHendrieShow'' regularly sues anyone and anything for any slight, no matter how minor. For example when his oh so hated neighbor cracks a joke at Steve's expense (often warranted), Steve not only sues him, but his son for laughing at the joke. If he was only in the presence of his neighbor because his wife asked him to, say, pick up groceries or trim the hedges, he will sue her for putting him in a dangerous position. The number of lawsuits Steve filed over the course of the show are innumerable, and every one as inane as the last.
* Parodied by ''Series/SaturdayNightLive'' ads for the law firm of Green & Fazio ("Call 1-800-HARASSS. The extra "S" is for extra harassment!").
* In ''Series/OnlyFoolsAndHorses'' episode "Hole in One", Del Boy decides to sue the ''Nag's Head'' after Uncle Albert falls into its cellar, despite the fact that he incurred no injury (they base the suit on emotional damages) and the Nag's Head offered Del a large settlement. The suit ends up being thrown out when the defense points out that Albert is a trained paratrooper (thus having knowledge of how to fall without injuring himself) and that he has "accidentally" fallen down pub cellars numerous times in the past, and taken the settlements.
* On ''Series/{{Becker}}'', Becker is sued by his patient, when Becker takes him to the gym for rehab-purposes, and the patient suffers a heart-attack as a result-- even though Becker saves his life, and Becker was rehabilitating him in order to prevent an inevitable heart-attack, and accompanied him there for safety-purposes. Becker's insurance company wants to settle, and agrees to clear Becker of all liability and expense; however Becker refuses on principle, even though it costs him considerable time, money and harassment. [[spoiler: He ends up managing to get the suit dismissed after a lengthy rant on the stand; however, his behaviour and personality has so antagonised the trial judge that she ends up throwing him in the slammer for contempt.]]
* A very mild example from ''Series/DoctorWho'' -- in "The Runaway Bride", Donna threatens to sue a cab driver who refuses to take her to her wedding in Chiswick... because neither she nor The Doctor are carrying any means of paying the fare.
* Happens in an episode of ''Series/TheBeverlyHillbillies''. During the trial, the unwitting hillbillies do very little to help their case until they accidentally divulge the fact that the guy suing them has a girlfriend on the side, at which point, his accomplice lets the cat out of the bag.[[note]]The hillbillies had not only seen the plaintiff with his girlfriend; part of the plaintiff's case was based on being wheelchair-bound. But he'd stood up to hug his girlfriend, which the defendants saw.[[/note]]
* In an episode of ''Series/LoisAndClark'', a man pretends to be injured after Supes saves his life, helped by an AmbulanceChaser who thinks successfully suing Superman will make him famous. He even pretends to get further injury when Supes takes a bomb out of the court (through the roof), but then his girlfriend snaps and spills the truth.
* In an episode of ''Series/{{Smallville}}'', Clark beats up a guy for attempting to sexually assault Lana, but the man sues him for his injuries. Clark's XRayVision shows him that the jerk isn't even injured, but he can't tell anybody that. (Apparently Clark's lawyer didn't think of asking for doctor's records, including more conventional X-rays.)
* In one episode of ''Series/{{Frasier}}'', a man in the coffeehouse takes Frasier's seat and acts very rudely to him. Frasier, who has been on the receiving end of much rudeness all day, finally snaps, lifts the man up by his armpits and throws him out of the shop. The next day he goes back to the man to apologise, only for the man to sue for assault. Niles however starts insulting the man, goading him until he very lightly pokes Niles in the chest. Niles immediately throws himself into the nearest table and threatens to counter sue. Frasier is quickly persuaded to play along:
-->'''Man''': I barely touched him!\\
'''Frasier''': Then you ''[[INeverSaidItWasPoison admit you touched him]]''! He admits it! You're all witnesses!
** Interestingly, Niles is spot-on here. In common law, battery is any offensive touching. Assault can be either an attempted battery or placing someone in reasonable fear of imminent bodily harm. You don't even need to touch someone to complete an assault and the guy poking Niles is a textbook definition of battery.
** For added humour/irony value, Niles seems to convincingly fake pain as a result of this... only for him to privately admit to Frasier than in his exaggerated fall, he accidentally landed on a fork.
* ''Series/{{JAG}}'': Harmon Rabb is subjected to a traffic accident scam with an AmbulanceChaser in "Standards of Conduct".
* ''Series/{{MASH}}'' has several examples of frivolous court martial attempts. In ''The Trial of Henry Blake'', Henry has to defend himself against gurney races, and Radar selling shoes and other things. General Steele brings in several charges against Hawkeye, including impersonating a civilian (''The General Flipped at Dawn''). In ''The Novocaine Mutiny'', Frank charges Hawkeye with mutiny for disobeying some idiotic orders. In all cases, all the charges are dropped.[[note]]The US Army permits defying orders that are idiotic, in violation of the Geneva Conventions, or otherwise objectionable--but the soldier had better be ready to defend his actions at the inquiry afterwards.[[/note]]
** Oddly, in ''M*A*S*H'', the episodes containing legal issues only come about when key characters usually aren't guilty. For example, when Hawkeye is tried for mutiny, it's a case where he was doing what was best for the patients. He's never tried for the many mutinies he actually commits or the times he fails to obey lawful orders.
* ''Series/TheWestWing'' has the ''President'' getting sued over his comments regarding car seatbelts.
* ''Series/{{Batman}}'': This is the plot of the pilot episode; the Riddler invokes this when he cleverly tricks the Dynamic Duo into falsely arresting him and then he sues Batman for a million dollars (in the sixties!). The point is not only the money (Bruce Wayne can afford it) but the fact that Batman must reveal his SecretIdentity, which would ruin his SuperHero career.
* ''Series/PennAndTellerBullshit'': An episode arguing against requirements for handicapped access uses as evidence the example of a handicapped man who would sue commercial shops ''en masse'' for not providing him with handicapped access. It would cost more to fight him than to pay the low damages he requested, netting him quite a hefty amount of money. He apparently hadn't even visited many of the stores he claimed to have attempted to enter, because some of them ''did'' have handicapped access.
* In the ''Series/SanfordAndSon'' episode "Whiplash", Fred ends up getting rear-ended by a white man in Cadillac. He isn't injured, but when his friend Bubba tells him that a friend of his sued for injuries from whiplash injuries, he decides to fake being injured to the point of filing a false police report, getting "advice" from an AmbulanceChaser and finally confronting the hit-and-run driver himself. [[spoiler:It all comes crashing down when the driver turns out to be a car thief who stole the Cadillac.]]
* ''Series/SpittingImage'' portrayed media tycoon Robert Maxwell this way, in a spoof where he sings his own riff on "Puttin' on the Ritz".
-->''When I'm feeling in the mood / Someone out there will be sued / I'll nail those gits! / I'm putting out the writs!''\\
''When writers try to criticize / In bios I've not authorized / I'll axe those crits / By putting out the writs!''\\
''Of taking legal action I am weary / So I've only served six writs since January!''\\
''When they put these tales about / I just have to squeeze them out / like little zits / I'm putting out the writs!''
* On ''Series/SiliconValley'', Erlich gets attacked by one of the Techcrunch judges [[spoiler: during Pied Piper's first presentation, for sleeping with his wife]] in part one of the season 1 finale. The second part opens with Pied Piper being allowed to continue because Erlich threatened to sue ''Techcrunch'' for allowing the judge to attack ''him''.
* ''Series/MurderSheWrote'': Jessica is subjected to a $50 million wrongful death in "Trails and Tribulations", with the AmoralAttorney expecting her insurance company will settle out-of-court for $1 million. He doesn't figure on Jessica's stubbornness.

[[folder:Newspaper Comics]]
* In ''ComicStrip/USAcres'', when Orson [[http://www.garfield.com/usacres/vault.html?yr=2012&addr=120511 read the tale of]] Goldilocks and the three bears and asked if any of the listeners knew what she did after trying the too hot and the too cold bowls of porridge, Lanolin suggested she sued the bears.
* In one arc of ''ComicStrip/NonSequitur'', Danae tries to sue the state for allowing her teacher to flunk her. The judge throws out the case after calling it [[StupidestThingIveEverHeard the second stupidest thing he'd ever heard]].
--> '''Danae's dad:''' Okay, I'll bite. What was the stupidest?\\
'''Danae:''' [[spoiler:That there's no shortage of lawyers willing to take the case.]]

* ''Radio/OurMissBrooks'': In the episode ''Mr. Travers' Three Acre Lot''. Mr. Conklin ''literally'' sets Miss Brooks up for a fall so he can sue Mr. Travers' and force the sale of the eponymous lot.

* Parodied in a ''Magazine/{{Mad}}'' article that details the rise and fall of an advertising campaign, specifically one for a ficticious fast food chain called [=McDimples=]. The chain sues a night club with male strippers for using their campaign's new and popular catchphrase, only to learn that said club has been using it for ten years. After being forced to pay a $5 million settlement when counter-sued, they fire their lawyers.

* Music/WeirdAlYankovic's song "I'll Sue Ya" is about a guy who does this. Lyrics include:
-->If I sprain my ankle while I'm robbing your place\\
If I hurt my knuckles when I punch you in the face\\
I'm gonna sue! Sue! Yes, I'm gonna sue!\\
Sue! Sue! Yeah, that's what I'm gonna do!
* DJ Jazzy Jeff & [[Creator/WillSmith The Fresh Prince's]] "You Saw My Blinker" tells the story of Will being rear-ended and sued by a half-blind 90-year-old woman who shows up to court in a wheelchair and a neck brace.
* Busdriver's ''Suing Sony''.
-->I'm suing Sony due to defamation of a character from a fictional character that was based on meeee...

* Probable UrExample: an Egyptian myth about a thief who breaks into a house via a window, but breaks his leg because of the window's shoddy construction. The homeowner blames the carpenter who put the window together, the carpenter blames a beautiful woman who distracted him, and the woman blames the fellow who dyed her dress red. That dress-dyer doesn't fit in a cell, so a shorter dress-dyer is hauled in, and he can't come up with an excuse to get out. The focus, incidentally, is not on the burglar, but on how ''crazy'' the judge authorizing it all is.
** A variation exists where the last man recommends to hang the thief, the thief is too tall to '''hang''', so a shorter man is brought. The man recommends to dig a hole below the thief's feet. The thief urges them to hurry so that he'll be able to get to heaven soon because a king is needed there... So the local king (who's also the crazy judge) orders ''himself'' hanged.

[[folder:Video Games]]
* In ''VideoGame/VampireTheMasqueradeBloodlines'', several of the [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ovLsFhd-EM adverts you can hear on the radio]] are political broadcasts for a fictional Republican senator. The first two imply his Democratic opponent has committed vehicular homicide (on the basis he owns a car of the type responsible for one in the area) and child pornography (on the basis he has not yet stated his opinion on the subject). When he sues the Republican, a third ad notes the Democrat had previously claimed to be against clogging up the courts with frivolous lawsuits, and implies he is a hypocrite ("Would you want your children to become hypocrites? Vote Republican candidate Robert Thorne, the candidate not accused of being a murderous child pornographer!")

[[folder:Web Comics]]
* In [[http://the-qlc.com/loserz/go/1 this strip]] of ''Webcomic/{{Loserz}}''. Well, they try, but it backfires.
* In ''Webcomic/NipAndTuck'', [[http://www.rhjunior.com/NT/00288.html a lawsuit against snack food companies is stopped by the observation that no one would sell them any more snacks.]]
* In ''Webcomic/ElfOnlyInn'', Megan decides to sue UsefulNotes/McDonalds after learning that french fries are prepared with beef-based products (she's vegan). UsefulNotes/McDonalds, after being sued for a whole array of ridiculous charges [[TakeThat (including the infamous hot coffee incident)]], decides to settle by offering a total of $100B to be evenly distributed among anyone in the world who admits to being too stupid to know better. [[SubvertedTrope Subverted]] hilariously when Megan, after receiving her settlement payout of $0.30, does the math to prove that she was short-changed, then writes a letter to UsefulNotes/McDonalds accusing them of the fact - to which they reply that as she is obviously not stupid, she must return her settlement payout or face legal actions for fraud.
* ''Webcomic/KevinAndKell'': A bear attacks Kevin, who easily backhands him. The bear responds by suing Kevin, claiming that, as a rabbit, he violated the natural order by fighting back and demanding Kevin's weight in meat. Mei Li gets the case thrown out by pointing out that the bear using the judicial system to attack Kevin is equally unnatural.
* In the ''WebComic/StandStillStaySilent'' prologue, a man finding out that the ferry he's riding will not be making the return trip to mainland Denmark because of a governmental decision to halt boat traffic threatens to sue all the boat's waiters if they don't make the captain turn it back while it's still on the way to Bornholm island.

[[folder:Web Original]]
* The old flash series ''Attention Deficit Disorder Man'' featured [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPOIsXAcLZI Lawsuit Larry]], a supervillain who took control over hundreds of organizations by injuring himself on their premises and suing them into oblivion. In the end, he managed to sue and control entire ''countries''; the only way ADD Man was able to defeat him was by making him injure himself from his own products, giving him nobody to sue but himself.
* Most of the cases in ''WebOriginal/TheSonicAmigos'' sub-series ''Retard Court starring Homer Simpson'' end up being this.

[[folder:Western Animation]]
* ''[[WesternAnimation/BatmanTheAnimatedSeries The New Batman Adventures]]'' parodied this with an [[NoCelebritiesWereHarmed unnamed Johnnie Cochran lookalike]] popping up to say a catchy line to support a lawsuit. In the commentary for one such episode, the creators note how dated the joke wound up being.
** In "Over the Edge," Batman's identity is exposed. Minor villains launch a billion dollar lawsuit against Wayne Enterprises. JC pops in: "If the bat's on a spree, Wayne must pay the fee!"
** When the Joker somehow acquired vast wealth, he used high-powered lawyers to get acquitted of his various crimes (clearly referencing Cochran's most famous case): "If a man's filled with glee, that man must go free!"
* Subverted in ''WesternAnimation/ClerksTheAnimatedSeries''. Jay slips on a wet mess that Randall left on the floor, and Randall taunts him about it. "What are you going to do, sue?" Right on cue, a lawyer walks in to buy some conveniences- but when Randall (yes, [[JerkAss Randall]]) asks him to take on the case, he refuses and leaves. Randall then begins a concerted campaign of harassment until the lawyer finally gives in and agrees to take on the case- against Dante, since he was the store manager at the time.
** At trial, the lawyer doesn't even show any significant effort, presenting the bare facts of the case without any grandstanding. Unfortunately, Dante still ends up looking really bad because his boss hired Randall (yes, [[JerkAss Randall]]), who presents an incompetent defense.
* In an episode of ''WesternAnimation/TheBoondocks'', Riley and his grandpa sue the school after Riley's teacher uses the N-word to refer to Riley, [[NWordPrivileges just the same as Riley had been throwing it around at everyone else]], with fantasies of getting a large sum of money.
* Happens in the early ''[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]]'' episode "Bart Gets Hit by a Car". Mr. Burns accidentally hits Bart with his limo; the family attorney 'tricks' Homer into exaggerating the resulting injuries to squeeze more money from Burns.
-->'''Lionel Hutz''': Doctor, are you sure there isn't a little soft tissue trauma in the facial area?\\
'''Dr. Nick''': Oh yeah, tons of it! ''[wrapping Bart's head with bandages]'' Just say when!
** The irony being they would have gotten something, at least covering Bart's hospital bill as Marge wanted, if they had just told the truth at trial rather than make up false claims.
** Or if Homer had just taken the half million Burns had offered him and went home. They ended up with nothing because Homer was greedy.
** There is also Homer vs. an 'all you can eat' seafood restaurant in "New Kid on the Block." If they kick Homer out before he has had 'all he can eat,' does this make it fraudulent publicity?
*** He stays hours past closing time, forces them to make runs to the grocery store and eats far more than any thoughtful person would. 'All you can eat' does not mean 'you can eat it all.'
*** They actually settle that one out-of-court; they invite him back, but set Homer up in a glass display and let all the people gawk at him pigging out! It draws boatloads of customers who came to watch, but they ''decide'' to try some food -- because this restaurant ''has'' to be pretty good if he's [[BigEater eating like that]]. Well, Homer is happier, the restaurant's owner is happiest, Marge... ''not so much''!
** Hutz also mentions in that episode that he sued ''Film/TheNeverEndingStory'' for ''false'' advertising.
** Selma has claimed that she has a lucrative hobby filing 'nuisance lawsuits'.
** Deconstructed in one of the frequent 'future episodes', Bart is an unemployed loser who frequently files these to make a quick buck, but it's deconstructed in that ''none'' of his ridiculous cases (among them: suing a restaurant for an over-salted french fry, Disneyland for a spider bite received on the premises, and a messenger company for refusing to pay him for his first two weeks of employment) ever goes to court, and it's implied Bart can't find a lawyer to take them all...
** One time Moe was able to sue a rope company when the rope that he was using to hang himself was weak, he won the case, got a good sum out of it, and a brand new rope with which to hang himself.
** Once, Homer trips over a hole in the ground next to the church and so sues the church. There is no way that Rev. Lovejoy could afford the sum he wants so he wins the church in court.
** In "Lisa the Simpson", one of the dozen or so of Homer's relatives that he gathers claims he makes a living by insurance-fraud lawsuits.
** The [[AmoralAttorney Blue-Haired Lawyer]] who works for Mr. Burns is ''usually'' smart enough to avoid something like this, but when he becomes ''too'' immoral and threatens to sue Principal Skinner for copyright violation (Springfield Elementary's carnival uses Creator/{{Disney}}'s catchphrase "The Happiest Place on Earth" -- [[{{Hypocrite}} just consider that for a minute]]) Skinner shows them what happened when [[BadassTeacher you make a former Green Beret]] mad. [[BadassBoast "Copyright expired"]], the lawyer says after he and his two goons lose their tobacco juice at Skinner's hands.
* ''WesternAnimation/SouthPark'':
** In "Sexual Harassment Panda", Kyle's dad (a lawyer) encourages a string of frivolous sexual harassment suits that culminates in a suit called "Everyone vs. Everyone". In which he represented ''both sides''.
** In "200", Creator/TomCruise sues the town for mocking him, and recruits the help of every celebrity who has ever been portrayed on the show, all because Stan called him a fudge packer when that is what he was doing. Literally: he was working at a candy factory, packing fudge into boxes, while wearing the uniform of an employee of that company.
* An episode of ''WesternAnimation/SpongebobSquarepants'' had Plankton feign serious injury from slipping and falling in the Krusty Krab just so he could sue Mr. Krabs for everything he owned (including the secret recipe for Krabby Patties).
* Happened both ways on ''WesternAnimation/WaitTillYourFatherGetsHome''. Harry slips on a dropped piece of butter in a restaurant and falls down. The restaurant owners are heavily insured, and out of fear of Harry filing a lawsuit, they offer him a settlement. Harry doesn't want to take it citing the fact he didn't injure himself, but his honesty is not respected by his family and neighbors who try to pressure him into taking the easy cash being offered. Later on, Harry becomes the defendant when a bicyclist crashes into his stopped car and decides to sue him. His lawyer (SpecialGuest Don Adams) is particularly inept and Harry is only saved from a losing judgment when the plaintiff suddenly decides to drop the case.
* On ''WesternAnimation/MyGymPartnersAMonkey'', Principal Pixiefrog's fear of lawsuits often either drove or exacerbated the wacky hijinks of the episode.
* ''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''
** The character Lucky is ''entirely sustained'' himself on frivolous lawsuits and refused to get a job. When we first meet him, he's just bought himself a new truck with money taken from "slippin' on pee-pee on th' Costco." When picked up by an ambulance, he even knows the exact amount of morphine to be given that will dull his pain without damaging his ability to testify. In the original GrandFinale, Lucky accidentally gets injured in Dale's house[[note]]Lucky and Dale were pretending to swordfight with poison wands, Lucky jumps onto a railing in the basement, which breaks and causes him to fall and hurt his back.[[/note]] so he can sue him so he can have an expensive wedding with Luanne. It turns out that Dale built the railing himself--without a permit, makes his own poison (he's an exterminator), is his own boss, and made up a fake liability insurance carrier just to shut Hank up. Lucky's lawyer tries to sue Strickland Propane because Hank suggested that Dale hire Lucky.
*** Lucky later manages to turn this around. [[spoiler:After the lawyer refuses to drop the case due to "[[AmoralAttorney malpractice reasons]]", Lucky fakes a video of him playing golf, thus making his suit void. The lawyer tried to "unfake" it to get the suit through, but Lucky manages to get "injured" again in the lawyer's office. Turns out the lawyer's colleagues are just as unscrupulous as him, since Hank's threat of taking the case to any other man in the building was fairly credible.]]
** In another episode, Dale sues the tobacco companies, lying to claim that years of secondhand smoke have made his wife unattractive and destroyed his marriage. When he discovers that the company has (electronic) bugs planted in his house, he tries to exploit it by insulting Nancy at every opportunity, which completely destroys her self-esteem and nearly ''does'' destroy the marriage. When Dale finally figures out what he's doing, he cross-examines ''himself'' and convinces everyone that he still finds Nancy gorgeous. Ironically, he was suing to get money for Nancy so she could get cosmetic surgery.
* The ''WesternAnimation/GravedaleHigh'' episode "Monster on Trial" featured old lady Fresno, who cried whiplash after her car was slightly nudged by Reggie during driving lessons, and sued Max Schneider for a million dollars. Turns out she did that 8 times already, but always wins anyway. She wins the case this time too (entering in a wheelchair), but the case finally gets overturned when she tries the same trick in a minor collision with the judge. Yeah, [[ArtisticLicenseLaw so when a plaintiff gets into an accident involving the judge of a previous case, that judge is allowed to declare the lawsuit against himself and his old court ruling void.]]
** Fresno also ran a red light when Reggie and Frankentyke chase her through Midtown, so karma nipped her in the bud.
* On ''WesternAnimation/RockosModernLife'', Rocko swats a fly while cooking burgers. The fly sees an ad on TV saying how he can make money by suing someone... and he sues Rocko. Rocko is sentenced to 30 days... as a fly. [[spoiler:Until the judge sees him at a fancy restaurant, completely uninjured, and turns Rocko back.]]
* In the ''WesternAnimation/{{Futurama}}'' movie ''Into The Wild Green Yonder'', Bender is caught in an explosion on Zapp Brannigan's ship, and screams that he can't feel his arms and will never be able to paint again. Kif tells him in a bored voice that [[UltimateJobSecurity you can't sue the military]], and Bender gets up.
** Professor Farnsworth considers one against the Wongs in "Where the Buggalo Roam":
--->'''Mrs. Wong''': Phew! Everyone OK? No one considering lawsuit?\\
'''Professor Farnsworth''': Hmm, I might have mental anguish...\\
'''Mr. Wong''': [[ScrewTheRulesIHaveConnections I'll have you know I'm friends with every judge on planet.]]\\
'''Professor''': I'm OK then.
* Joe Adler, a recurring incompetent lawyer on ''WesternAnimation/BeavisAndButthead'', specializes in this (with Beavis and Butthead's help). In the episode "Sexual Harrassment," he decides to sue Beavis and Butthead's classmate Kimberly (as well as their high school and teacher) for giving the boys erections. In the episode "Whiplash," he decides to sue the city and the state for an obviously false case of whiplash (which he helps to create the illusion of) is arrested for dozens of counts of fraud.
* [[MeaningfulName Courtney]] from ''WesternAnimation/TotalDramaIsland''. Her first lawsuit wasn't so unjustified (fellow competitor Harold rigged the votes against her, sending her home instead, and the host of the show didn't care), but she also bargained for unfair advantages (most notably contact with the outside world via her PDA) along with reentry into the second season. Once she was back in the game, she threatened to sue the producers again every time something didn't go her way.
* In the ''WesternAnimation/SonicBoom'' episode, "[[Recap/SonicBoomS1E17DontJudgeMe Don't Judge Me]]", Dr. Eggman spends most of the episode in a neck brace, claiming Sonic injured his neck in a battle between them, and attempting to sue him over it. He very nearly gets away with it, too, until Sonic notices him move his neck just fine and points it out near the end of the episode.

[[folder:Real Life]]
* The band The Romantics vs. Creator/{{Activision}} because "the cover band in ''VideoGame/GuitarHero Encore: Rocks the 80s'' sounds too good". The case got thrown out by the judge.
* Nancy Stouffer, author of ''Literature/TheLegendOfRahAndTheMuggles'', who sued Creator/JKRowling in 1999 for "plagiarism", because among other things, [[http://www.ahoymatey.com/Potter/ Rowling used her "Muggles"]], even though Stouffer's alien Teletubby-like goblins had nothing to do with Rowling's [[{{Muggles}} normal humans]] (and weren't actually called muggles; that was something Stouffer made up to increase her chances of winning) and the word 'muggle' already existed as a somewhat antiquated term for 'dullard'. Once the judges saw Stouffer's book was a terribly written piece of wall fragment, they dropped the case as fast as it came. Hoping to cash in on NoSuchThingAsBadPublicity, a small-time publisher picked the [[VanityPublishing vanity published]] original (because no respectable publisher would dare touch it) and did a small printing run of Stouffer's book in 2001. The next year, the publisher folded.
* In the music world, the incident of Versailles (a US solo act) vs. Music/{{Versailles}} (a Japanese band that predated her by ''years''). Both are, of course, named after a French city that predates them by centuries. The US artist freaked at the thought that the Japanese band was "stealing" Google searches from her, didn't trademark the name until ''after'' she'd found out about their existence, and tried to sue them to keep them from ever playing in the United States. The band eventually changed their name to "Versailles Philharmonic Quintet" for their US releases and performances, although they continue to go by simply "Versailles" everywhere else.
* Before that, the LA punk rock band Music/{{X}} sued Music/XJapan when they first tried to perform in the US around 1990-1991, because at the time they too were called X. The lawsuit was judged in favor of the LA band despite the ridiculousness of the argument that somehow fans couldn't tell the difference between a Japanese thrash metal Visual Kei act and an American punk band, and the Japanese band was forced to rename itself to ''X Japan'' and not perform in the US for a few years. Other issues hit, and it wouldn't be until 2010 that Music/XJapan would have a full live performance in the US.
* Hiroshi Matsumoto, brother of the late [[Music/HidetoMatsumoto hide]] filing one of these against Music/YoshikiHayashi of X Japan for using hide's image in X Japan, never mind that X Japan had been the band hide had been with the longest (from 1987 to 1997) and where he had first earned widespread fame. The judge threw out the lawsuit around a month after its filing, [[InvokedTrope actually calling it]] a frivolous lawsuit in the brief doing so and prohibiting Hiroshi or his lawyers from filing suit again over that particular use of hide's image.
* [[http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE58O3BK20090925 A shining example]]. In retaliation for bad customer service, as delivered by a "Spanish woman", a man attempted to sue the Bank of America for "1,784 billion, trillion dollars". (Read: ''More money than actually exists.'')
* [[http://www.cracked.com/article_19633_5-most-satisfying-tales-payback.html Due to a clerical error, Bank of America once tried to foreclose on a home owned by a family who had paid for it in full up front, and had no mortgage or account with them]]. Despite the fact that they had no legal right to the house whatsoever, the Bank still took it to court. The judge immediately threw it out and ordered the bank to pay the family's legal fees. When they didn't, the family obtained a writ of execution and levied upon the bank branch that sued them. Since the levy meant that the family could take any of the bank's property up to the amount of their judgment, including ''all of the money in the safe'', the bank finally acknowledged it was a mistake and immediately paid.
* The Church of Scientology, every time you say anything at all that may be criticizing them. Seriously. If what you say is (according to them) false, it's libel or slander (depending on the medium of dissemination). If it's true, and about any of their doctrine, dogma or practices, it's ''copyright infringement''. Other cases, they just dig around until they find something to pick at. No matter how little the chance of you being a threat. They don't do it for the money, they do it to bankrupt their victims with legal fees, thus shutting them up, plus the potential intimidation factor against people who might want to criticize the Church but would rather not risk getting sued to oblivion for doing so (given that they fought the U.S. Government and ''won'').
* [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernie_Chambers Senator Ernie Chambers]], tired of hearing about frivolous lawsuits, decided to make a point and file one of his own... against ''God''. The kicker? Chambers is atheist.
** On the other end of the aisle in almost every way: your life sucks? [[http://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/list/cyberia-l/msg40881.html Sue Satan]]! The "unofficial account" comes from a fictional story and the whole thing reads with such a DeadpanSnarker tone that it's impossible not to laugh. Good luck getting that summons served, as it requires Satan be a resident of the state of Pennsylvania.[[note]]Technically not true: Pennsylvania allows service outside Pennsylvania where the defendant committed acts in Pennsylvania or committed acts outside Pennsylvania causing harm in Pennsylvania, among other things, so long as the suit arises out of those acts and the exercise of Pennsylvania's jurisdiction would be acceptable under the Due Process Clause. Whether the Devil has sufficient minimum contacts with Pennsylvania, or whether it would be reasonable and fair for Pennsylvania to exercise personal jurisdiction over a resident of Hell, a foreign country, is left as an exercise for the reader. Also left as an exercise to the reader is whether the Devil has sovereign immunity as the ruler of Hell.[[/note]] While not binding precedent in Pennsylvania, being a New Hampshire case, the record of ''[[TheDevilAndDanielWebster Stone v. Scratch]]'' may provide some guidance on that count. The judge also notes that the plaintiff neglected to give the court directions on how to serve Satan the complaint. Even if you get past all that, Satan is a lawyer.
* Jonathan Lee Riches. He's filed ''thousands'' of these suits against various celebrities and political figures for questionable reasons, but that's not what pushes him over the edge. No, what pushes him past the RefugeInAudacity line is that [[http://petrofsky.org/misc/legal-docs/Riches-vs-Bush-docket.html his lawsuit against George W. Bush]] names ''783'' other defendants, including Marco Polo, "various Buddhist Monks", Website/{{Google}}, ''Literature/TheDaVinciCode'', ''[[Myth/NorseMythology Norse Gods]]'', [[ThoseWackyNazis Adolf Hitler's National Socialist Party]], the Gambino crime family and the Taliban, ''Literature/MeinKampf'', the ''Leaning Tower of Pisa'', ''the [[Literature/TheBible Garden of Eden]]'', the ''Ming Dynasty'' and ''[[PlutoIsExpendable former planet Pluto]]''. He once sued the Guinness Book of Records for listing him as "The world's most litigious man". No such record exists.
* Leo Stoller, a self-styled "intellectual property entrepreneur" (read: con-artist), trademarked such words and phrases as Stealth, Sentra, Dark Star, Air Frame, Stradivarius, Havoc, Chestnut, Trillium, White Line Fever, Fire Power, Love Your Body, Terminator, and many, many more. Once he trademarked a word or phrase, he immediately launched million-dollar lawsuits against people and companies who were casually using those words. His lawsuits have consistently been laughed out of court.
* {{Moral Guardian|s}} [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_(activist) Jack Thompson]] was infamous for his lawsuits and legal threats directed at companies ranging from Creator/TakeTwoInteractive to Creator/{{Nintendo}} to Wendy's to Webcomic/PennyArcade to Wiki/{{Wikipedia}} to Website/{{Facebook}}. He was eventually '''permanently disbarred''' by the Florida Bar Association, for including gay pornography in one of his court filings in addition to a lengthy history of abusive personal attacks, frivolous litigation for the purpose of harassment, making false statements, and [[NeverMyFault completely and utterly failing to display regret and remorse or even just admit to wrongdoing]].
* ''Administrative law judge'' [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_v._Chung Roy Pearson]] sued a small, family-owned laundromat for fifty-four million dollars in damages after they misplaced a pair of his trousers for a day or two. It was finally settled once and for all after roughly four years. He lost, but not before making the life of the laundromat owners thoroughly miserable, even after they made repeated offers to settle for $3000, $4600, and $12000. He's also no longer a judge, thanks in part to this suit.
* Valery Fabrikant is a man who walked into Concordia University in Montreal and shot many of his colleagues. During his life sentence he's become famous for filing these. So many that in 2000, the Quebec Superior Court declared him a vexatious litigant (meaning he needs the approval of a judge to take any legal proceedings against someone else). A bid to clear that status was dismissed by the Court in 2007.
* In his book ''Somebody's Gotta Say It'', talk show host Radio/NealBoortz related a story from his legal days where a man entered his office and tried to start a lawsuit over a mislabeled beverage can. Boortz's response was "Get the hell out of my office."
* Ride/DisneyThemeParks:
** Cast Members were filming a training film at Disneyland on what to do if there's been an accident. As soon as the actor fell down, [[AmbulanceChaser a lawyer]] appeared from among the bystanders encouraging the "injured" man to sue Disneyland and continued to do so ''after they walked past the camera''.
** Also at Disneyland, a guest jumped out of his Skyway cabin in an attempt to injure himself and sue the park. Originally claiming that the door on the cabin was faulty and that he fell out, the court became suspicious of the fact that the man conveniently landed in the only tree below the ride that could have broken his fall and saved his life. Although he continued on with his story, after the cabin door was inspected and revealed to be in working order the guest admitted that he had jumped out of the attraction and was goaded into filing a lawsuit by his family. Nevertheless, the park removed the Skyway shortly after the lawsuit was dismissed in case someone decided to try it again.
** One other humorous example is someone claiming that one of the three little pigs sexually harassed her and caused her to gain weight. She was laughed out of court because the costumes were shown as having inoperable stub-arms.
** One of the more odd and, frankly, amusing lawsuits against Disney was when hyena researchers sued Disney for defamation of character for their portrayal of [[TerribleTrio the hyena trio]] in Disney/TheLionKing. Now, if ANY researchers should have a beef with Disney, it's herpetologists for the constant use of ReptilesAreAbhorrent.\\
Disney was asked by some of these researchers not to portray the hyenas as evil. Disney responded by portraying the main trio as {{Ineffectual Sympathetic Villain}}s, who also became three major {{Ensemble Darkhorse}}s.
* "Dr." Tim Langdell, CEO of Edge Games, claims to own the video game trademark for the word "Edge." The man hasn't made a video game since the 80's, but whenever a video game with the word "Edge" in its name is announced, he jumps on the developer and publisher with a trademark infringement lawsuit. His downfall came when he announced "'''MIRRORS''' [-a game from-] '''EDGE'''", well after ''VideoGame/MirrorsEdge'' came out, and promptly sued Creator/ElectronicArts over it. EA managed to [[http://gamepolitics.com/2010/10/07/edge-games-stripped-trademarks-could-face-fraud-charges get Langdell's trademarks pulled]] and set him and his company up for some ''serious'' fraud charges.
* Westboro Baptist Church does this to its critics. Its most often-used defense is that its right to free speech is being violated. These are the people who picket military funerals because they see the deaths of soldiers as divine punishment for serving a country that tolerates gay people. They even picketed Heath Ledger's funeral. Why? For ''playing the role of a gay cowboy in Film/BrokebackMountain''. The general opinion of many people (even in the American Civil Liberties Union) is that they're [[OnlyInItForTheMoney doing it for money]]. One theory is that they are deliberately antagonizing people so that they will be assaulted, only to sue for damages, since their protests are, well, deliberately antagonizing, but always in public places where they can legally sue anyone who attacks them over it.
** Fred Phelps, Sr. (the leader of this church) was an attorney until he filed a frivolous lawsuit of his own against a court reporter, which ultimately led to his disbarment. The suit was because the court reporter had not given him a report on time as he had asked. He sued her for $22,000. The thing that got him disbarred was the fact that he falsified eight sworn statements which he claimed to have obtained, but he had never contacted any of the people.
** Another suit that Fred filed was a $50 million class action lawsuit against Sears for being a few days late delivering a TV. 6 years later they settled out of court for $126.
* President-Elect Donald Trump once [[http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/donald-trump-loses-libel-lawsuit-232923 filed a defamation lawsuit]] for $5 billion against Timothy O’Brien, claiming he had been slandered when O'Brian's book ''[=TrumpNation=]: The Art of Being The Donald'' called him a "millionaire" rather than a "billionaire". Although Trump provided testimony to prove his net worth did indeed exceed $7 billion, it was thrown out by the judge, who claimed O’Brien committed no "actual malice" and that Trump could not confirm his true, definite net worth.
* There is now a class action lawsuit in progress against Apple because some older iTunes gift cards advertised that "songs are 99 cents" (there are now some songs that cost $1.20).
* In an instance nicely averted by a cry of "Have your attorney talk to ''my'' attorney", self-proclaimed psychic Sylvia Browne threatened to sue Robert Lancaster, manager of [[http://stopsylvia.com a website]] devoted to debunking Browne's claims. Her -- or her lawyers' -- [[http://stopsylvia.com/articles/browne_attempttosilence.shtml argument]] was that by (back then) calling his site "Stop Sylvia Browne", Lancaster was ''infringing trademark'': his use of her name, the claim went, "misleads the consumer as to the source or affiliation". They were arguing that someone reading his site, on which nearly every word ''criticized'' Sylvia Browne, might mistake it for Browne's own website. Mr. Lancaster had his own lawyers [[http://stopsylvia.com/articles/response_attempttosilence.shtml reply]] to this blatant attempt at a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation SLAPP]]; Ms. Browne's lawyers have not to date followed up.
* When Creator/DavidLetterman left NBC for CBS, NBC threatened to sue him if he used intellectual property from ''Series/LateNight'' such as "Stupid Pet Tricks" and the Top Ten list. The problems with this include top ten lists preceding Letterman's show, and the fact that Stupid Pet Tricks actually came from a show which Letterman legally owned the intellectual property of. When both Letterman and Jay Leno mocked them for it, the issue was dropped. This made it into ''Literature/WhatWereTheyThinkingThe100DumbestEventsInTelevisionHistory'', and the entry included a ShoutOut to Judge Wapner and mocked the trope.
* Orly Taitz. Despite her numerous lawsuits (all claiming that UsefulNotes/BarackObama is not a US citizen and therefore ineligible to be president) being tossed out of court left, right and center; being fined $20,000 effectively for wasting the court's time and a public perception that she is completely barking mad, she keeps right on filing them. She has only been granted a hearing once (in 2012, to challenge the Georgia primary), and the President - named as the defendant - did not even send a lawyer; Taitz's testimony clearly only worsened the judge's opinion, as he still ruled against her. ''The Drudge Report'' described the hearing as, "Empty Table 1, Orly Taitz 0".
** On an episode of ''Series/RealTimeWithBillMaher'', Maher offered Creator/DonaldTrump one million dollars to release his birth certificate to prove he was not the lovechild of an orangutang, parodying a similar offer Trump had made to President Obama during the birther debacle. Much to everyone's surprise, Trump not only complied, but had his lawyer send a threatening letter to Maher demanding the promised money on penalty of legal action. It never went to court since, as Maher himself put it, jokes made by a comedian on a late night talk show do not constitute a legal contract.
* Universal Studios once tried to sue Creator/{{Nintendo}} and several other companies selling ''VideoGame/DonkeyKong'' merchandise over allegations that it infringed on the ''Film/KingKong'' copyright. What makes this frivolous is that not only was King Kong a PublicDomainCharacter, but Universal ''themselves'' had proven he was such in an earlier lawsuit. Furthermore, the judge ruled that even if there had been a copyright, Universal still wouldn't have had a case, saying that, at best, Donkey Kong was a parody of King Kong. Needless to say, they lost, and were forced to pay back every bit of money they had gotten plus damages. Nintendo was so grateful to the lawyer who defended them in the lawsuit that they gave him exclusive rights to name his yachts "Donkey Kong" and later named a successful video game franchise after him. The lawyer's name was John VideoGame/{{Kirby}}. To make it even sweeter, Nintendo later (successfully) sued Universal for their King Kong video game, which was itself a blatant ripoff of Donkey Kong.
* In a [[http://www.hoax-slayer.com/lawyer-cigar-arson.shtml joke/urban legend]] somebody insured his cigars against fire; after smoking them all, he tried to collect the insurance. The insurance company turned the table on him by charging him with arson.
** Also a song by Brad Paisley ([[http://www.cowboylyrics.com/lyrics/paisley-brad/the-cigar-song-2109.html The Cigar Song]]).
** That story was also mentioned in ''Literature/MySistersKeeper''.
* Creator/SpikeLee's attempt to sue the then-newly-renamed Creator/SpikeTV. The common joke at the time quickly became wondering if he was going to sue railroad spikes next.
* There are a couple of lawsuits pending against Casey Anthony, the Florida woman who was tried and acquitted of murdering her daughter, but one complaint filed in October of 2012 was pretty absurd. A Pennsylvania woman sought ''$3 billion'' in damages for psychological and emotional distress, claiming that Anthony was a member of the Illuminati who told the plaintiff that she would poison her water and that the plaintiff had secret cameras lodged behind her eyes watching her every move. (A full copy of the complaint [[http://www.christianpost.com/news/casey-anthony-3-billion-lawsuit-sued-83205/ can be found here.]]) The lawsuit was thrown out before a judge could even consider it.
* Singer Lady Miss Kier of the former group Deee-Lite (of "Groove Is In The Heart" fame) sued Creator/{{Sega}}, claiming that popular space reporter Ulala of the ''VideoGame/SpaceChannel5'' dance game series was created based on her likeness. She promptly lost the lawsuit, as Sega claimed that the creators of Ulala did not even know who Lady Miss Kier or Deee-Lite were when they created her.
* Monster Cable Products will threaten to sue (and has occasionally filed suit against) anyone who uses the word "Monster" to sell anything. Monster Energy Drink, ''WesternAnimation/MonstersInc'', Monster Mini Golf, and Monster.com have all been pressured by the company. The suits have all ultimately gone nowhere, since Monster Cable's copyrights only extend to just that: electronic cables.
* [[http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2011/01/exclusive-documents-woman-blames-p-diddy-world-trade-center-collapse-demands-100 A woman is suing P. Diddy for $1 trillion]] for causing 9/11 and also for allegedly date-raping her and impregnating her 24 years ago. $900 billion is for child support and $100 billion is for loss of income. This is roughly the GDP of a decent-sized country ([[DontExplainTheJoke 2010, Mozambique]]). Diddy himself is one of the most successful entrepreneurs in hip hop, and he's worth only about half a billion.
* [[http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202486102650&Manhattan_Federal_Judge_Kimba_Wood_Calls_Record_Companies_Request_for__Trillion_in_Damages Record labels want]] $75 trillion for copyright-related damages. That's ''five times'' the US national debt in 2011, and more money ''than exists on the planet'' (global GDP is somewhere on the order of US$61 Trillion).
* The fact that ''Magazine/PrivateEye'' do actually lose a lot of libel cases means that anyone who gets criticized in the magazine thinks it's worth a shot. Most of them receive "[[http://mattwpbs.com/2009/08/10/i-refer-you-to-the-reply-given-in-arkell-vs-pressdram-1971 the reply given in Arkell v. Pressdram]]". In one example, the owners of ''The Daily Telegraph'' threatened to sue over a spoof ''Telegraph'' front page treating their own financial arrangements like the MP expenses scandal the paper broke. The ''Eye'' pointed out that this was clearly in the "joke" section of the magazine, and could no more be mistaken for a real ''Telegraph'' headline than ''The New Coalition Academy'' could be mistaken for a real school newsletter. ''Allegedly'' it is considered a mark of seniority amongst the relevant section of the English Bar, much like the first time one buys a round for their old man, or first drives a car, to have represented Pressdram Inc. (the ''Eye'''s publisher) in a court case. Of course, this may simply be the MemeticBadass-ery of ''Private Eye'' as a maniacal offending machine.
* ''Film/TheRoom'' director Tommy Wiseau made a laughingstock of himself when he threatened lawsuits to various negative video reviews of the film, claiming that their use of clips from the film violated copyright (the use of short excerpts for the purpose of criticism is protected by the Fair Use section of the U.S. Copyright Act and backed up by extensive court precedent). Most notably, among his targets were two videos on Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses (one was WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic's review of the film), whose massive fanbase put Wiseau on the end of a counterattack of epic proportions. They eventually got him to back down, and the reviews are now back up.
* A famous Pepsi ad showed a series of goodies a kid could get for turning in Pepsi points, culminating in a Harrier jet with the caption "7,000,000 POINTS." Some kid actually tried to purchase one with a $700,000 check at ten cents a point (actual unit price of an AV-8B Harrier II at the time was about $34 million), and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_v._Pepsico,_Inc sued Pepsi when they declined]]. Among other things, he demanded a jury composed of "The Pepsi Generation" to hear his claim. The judge threw the case out, noting that any reasonable person would get the joke. Although, just to be safe, this made any company who uses a similar gag in their ads start including some "prize not actually available" legalese.
* Music/KatyPerry (stage name) tried to sue[[note]]In Australia the legal process of disputing a trademark doesn't involve filing a lawsuit, so ''technically'' Katy Perry didn't "sue"[[/note]] an Australian fashion designer named Katie Perry (birth name) to stop Katie from using her ''real name'' for her label. Katy Perry eventually dropped the suit because it was ridiculous.
* Creator/AlFranken was sued by the Creator/FoxNewsChannel for his book ''Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right'' for using Fox News's motto: "Fair and Balanced". The judge heard both sides' arguments and told them he needed a moment to consider. He stepped out of the courtroom for two seconds before returning and saying, "Your (Fox's) claim is completely without merit, both legally and factually."
* In the year 2014, Creator/Lindsay Lohan sued Creator/Rockstar Games, accusing the company of basing the in-game celebrity Lacey Jonas and the blonde, bikini-clad girl in the game's merchandising materials on her likeness without her permission. The case was thrown out by the judge, as the character's appearance was actually based on that of the fashion model Shelby Welinder, and it was found that Rockstar Games had absolutely no contact with her whatsoever.
* A man named [[http://www.loweringthebar.net/2007/08/man-sues-1-800-.html Leroy Greer]] bought flowers from 1-800 Flowers with a love note. That wasn't a big deal...until a "Thank you for doing business with us" letter came in the mail to his home and was found by his wife. She had not received any flowers, nor had she any knowledge of a recent floral purchase, so she called the company to see what was up. Turns out some flowers ''had'' been purchased...[[YourCheatingHeart for another woman he was seeing on the side]].[[note]] The Greers were separated, beginning divorce proceedings, but were still legally married as the divorce was not yet final[[/note]] So ''he'' decided to sue the florist's ass off for delivering the thank-you note, even though that's their standard business procedure and they had sent it to ''his'' (and his soon-to-be-ex-wife's) house... because now that there was proof of adultery, he was going to have to pay his soon-to-be-ex-wife a higher settlement.
* The [[OlderThanTheyThink Babylonian]] Code of Hammurabi actually had specific rules set in place to prevent these. If no evidence could be found to support a claim or the plantiff was found to be using false witness, the plantiff could be '''[[SeriousBusiness executed]]'''. Bear in mind this wasn't put in place as a preventative measure. The Code of Hammurabi wasn't a codified set of laws, so much as a list of legal decisions Hammurabi had made in the past, meaning he ''actually had put at least one person to death for a frivolous lawsuit.''
* Häagen-Dazs, an American ice cream company who designed their name to sound Scandinavian, once brought the American ice cream company Frusen Glädjé (whose name means "Frozen Joy" in Swedish if you remove the accent that was put there to help Americans pronounce it right) to court. Why? Because the Häagen-Dazs people considered it false advertising that Frusen Glädjé were using a Scandinavian-sounding name despite being American. Since Häagen-Dazs were doing the exact same thing with their name (which actually sounds German to most Scandinavians), the court found that by the doctrine of "[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unclean_hands unclean hands]]" (you cannot sue someone else for doing something when you yourself are doing the exact same thing), Häagen-Dazs was barred from suing Frusen Glädjé or indeed anyone else over using faux-Scandinavian names to market ice cream. If you're wondering who ''could'' bring such a suit: Only an actual Scandinavian company marketing ice cream with a "We're Scandinavian!" schtick would have grounds, but even then they wouldn't be particularly likely to prevail.
* One (most likely a hoax) example in China centered around a man who sued his wife just because [[http://www.clutchmagonline.com/2012/11/man-sues-his-wife-for-giving-birth-to-ugly-baby-wins-120000/ she gave birth to an ugly baby]], under the reasoning that they were both so beautiful that there was no possible way that they could have produced an ugly baby and therefore she must have been cheating on him. Even more galling was the fact that he ''won'', getting 120,000 dollars.
** A similar case happened in South Korea, where the man instead ordered a paternity test to find out if his wife had cheated on him; when it came out she did not, he found out she had a lot of facial operations in the past. It's said he apologized to her for mistrust and she accepted the apology. The child will probably get similar operations later.
* John Fogerty, of Music/CreedenceClearwaterRevival fame, was once [[http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/01/arts/music/01foge.html sued for $140 million]] for plagiarizing ''himself''. Saul Zaentz of Fantasy Records alleged that Fogerty's song "The Old Man Down the Road," from his solo 1985 album "Centerfield," was a remake of CCR's "Run Through the Jungle," to which Zaentz owned the copyright. Fogerty won; although the case ended up in the [[http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-1750.ZS.html U.S. Supreme Court]], it was over a technical matter (namely, whether Fantasy Records would have to pay Fogerty's attorney's fees after Fantasy's appeal was smacked down by the Ninth Circuit; the Supreme Court, evidently CCR fans, granted Fogerty's motion).
* Country music star Music/TimMcGraw was sued for delivering a contractually obligated album ''too early''. Curb Records alleged that [=McGraw=]'s recordings had to be "topical and new," and delivered within a specific window of time after his last album. [=McGraw=] countersued and, as in the Fogerty case, [[http://tasteofcountry.com/tim-mcgraw-curb-records-appeals-court-ruling/ the label lost]]. [=McGraw=] now records for Big Machine Records. Curb released the "too early" album, "Emotional Traffic," in 2012.
* Yoko Ono filed a lawsuit against singer Lennon Murphy to keep her from performing under the name "Lennon". That's right, Yoko tried to keep someone from using their own name for musical purposes. Ono eventually lost the case.
* Scenario: You're attending a prestigious university for free because your father is a professor there. You don't attend/participate in class. You get a C+, and as a result you don't get the career you wanted. Logical solution: [[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2277651/Woman-27-sues-Lehigh-University-1-3-million-C-got-2009.html#axzz2KiLnEhRT Sue the university for 1.3 million dollars]], accusing your professor of sexual discrimination.
* In December 2012, Creator/{{Sega}} filed a lawsuit against Creator/{{Level 5}} for 900 million yen (US $11 million) alleging that ''VideoGame/InazumaEleven'' infringes on 2 of Sega's patents by using drag-and-drop and tap commands on a touchscreen to control multiple characters at once, i.e. using the Nintendo DS touchscreen ''as a freaking touchscreen''. In quite possibly the most epic pwning ever to happen via corporate public statement, Level-5 [[http://www.level5.co.jp/news/20121212/popup.html responded]] by calmly pointing out that Sega's 2 patents in question are dated 2009 and 2011, whereas ''Inazuma Eleven'' was released in 2008, then proceeding to basically call out Sega for patent trolling.
* Creator/SiliconKnights[='=] example [[GoneHorriblyWrong led to their]] [[CreatorKiller termination]]. A year before the release of ''VideoGame/TooHuman'', Silicon Knights sued Creator/EpicGames over selling them a version of the Unreal Engine 3 that was allegedly glitchy and flawed. However, in a twist of fate, Epic counter-sued them, citing unauthorized modifications to the engine and the lack of credit or royalties Epic was given. After five years of arguing, the court ruled in favor of Epic, and Silicon Knights was fined $13 million for damages as a direct result. In addition, they were ordered by the court to recall and [[KeepCirculatingTheTapes eradicate]] all unsold copies of ''Too Human'', their later project, ''VideoGame/XMenDestiny'', the game codes using the modified engine, and any other future projects planned.
* Creator/GamesWorkshop apparently has attempted to copyright the term ''SpaceMarine'' (which needless to say is older than the MegaCorp itself) so it is in the position to sue any fiction or people using it which they certainly will if their frequent use of copyright infringement lawsuits is any indications. Creator/{{Bungie}} and Creator/{{Blizzard|Entertainment}} are said to be prepared.
** They did use it to take ''Literature/SpotsTheSpaceMarine'' off Amazon, but a few months later the e-book was reinstated after massive backlash. And the revelation that their trademark is only for gaming material.
** Oddly enough, Games Workshop only started doing things like that after they got the ''Literature/TheLordOfTheRings'' license and their lawyers had to start dealing with Saul Zaentz, who, as mentioned above, sued John Fogerty for plagiarizing himself.
* The 1976 swine flu vaccination campaign was followed by a wave of lawsuits claiming that the vaccine was responsible for a couple thousand cases of [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillain%E2%80%93Barr%C3%A9_syndrome Guillain–Barré syndrome]] that occurred shortly after the patient received a shot, despite over 40 million people being vaccinated and numerous studies showing that the odds of developing the disorder were no higher after immunization than before.
* In late 2004, Colt Defense LLC (the military/law enforcement/security forces, separate from the civilian-oriented parent company) sued both Bushmaster Firearms and Heckler & Koch for trademark infringement due to them releasing "M4-branded" weapons (in particular H&K's "[=HKM4=]" and Bushmaster's "M4 type weapons"), but ''also'' that the visual ''look'' of the weapons was recognized as an indicator of the brand (trade dress). H&K settled out of court and changed their weapon's name to [=HK416=], but Bushmaster separated their suit from H&K's, got the case moved to a court in their home state and moved for a summary judgment that in fact Colt's federal trademark on the term M4 should be cancelled because the term M4 was itself generic, arguing that "relevant" customers and trade publications were treating the term as generic[[note]]for example, magazines which would differentiate M4-type weapons by manufacturer, such as "Rock River Arms M4", or customer inquiries/correspondence with Bushmaster using the term M4 to describe the weapon, ''not'' the manufacturer[[/note]], while at least ''fifteen'' different manufacturers had previously been allowed[[note]]by virtue of not being sued[[/note]] to market their similar-looking weapons with the M4 name. Not only was the judgment granted based in part on the above arguments and evidence, but [[http://www.med.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Cohen/2005/DMC_09202005_2-04cv240_Colt_v_Bushmaster_AFFIRMED_12062005.pdf the district court opinion]] and [[http://media.ca1.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/getopn.pl?OPINION=06-1696.01A the subsequent U.S. appeals court opinion]] both pointed out that there was however-limited evidence that Colt ''itself'' had used the term M4 in a generic manner, and the term M4 referring to a particular 'style' of weapon was a military-issued designation, ''not'' a term originated by Colt. And when Colt was pressed to offer an appropriate generic name besides M4 for this style of weapon:
-->Finally, Colt contends that evidence that there are words other than M4 to designate the product at issue was ignored. According to Colt, such evidence is probative of non-generic use because the existence of other suitable identifiers suggest that M4 is not a name for a type of gun but rather is an identifier of the brand of gun. '''Colt argues that the words carbine, rifle, and firearm are adequate alternative descriptors of the M4'''.
* The ''Russian government'' did this in 2012, believe it or not, suing Music/{{Madonna}} for "propagandizing homosexual behavior" during a concert, in a hearing that bordered on the absurd. During the hearing, the prosecutor - who sought $10.7 million - claimed that the singer's so-called "propaganda of perversion" would negatively affect Russia's birthrate and erode the nation's defense capability by depriving the country of future soldiers. The judge almost had to tell court reporters to leave because they were laughing so much, and he eventually threw the case out. As you might expect, Madonna neither attended the hearing nor commented on the result.
* [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Oatmeal_and_FunnyJunk_legal_dispute FunnyJunk vs. The Oatmeal.]] In short:
** Matthew Inman (creator of Webcomic/TheOatmeal) finds out [=FunnyJunk=] hosts copies of his comics without his permission, and posts an annoyed rant about it on his own website.\\
[=FunnyJunk=] hires a lawyer who claims Inman's post constitutes defamation of their site, and demands $20,000 in damages.\\
Inman refuses, and instead starts an Indiegogo campaign to raise $20,000 for the National Wildlife Foundation and the American Cancer Society (he ends up raising more than ten times that amount).\\
[=FunnyJunk=]'s lawyer sues Inman, Indiegogo, ''the American Cancer Society, the National Wildlife Federation and a hundred anonymous Internet users'', claiming they might commit charity fraud.\\
Finally, Inman proves he has donated all the money he had raised to charity, and [=FunnyJunk=] drops their lawsuit.
** It gets even more bizarre. The laywer that [=FunnyJunk=] hired? He proceeded to go completely insane and started suing everyone under the sun. He tried to sue a satire site about him for libel, however by doing so he managed to make himself into a public figure, and so the site was protected by parody laws. His wife started to rant about how anyone that criticized them were [[GodwinsLaw Nazis]], etc. Net result was that he had to pay $46,100 to the satire site.
* Jesse Dimmick, who was running from a murder charge in Colorado, [[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/29/jessie-dimmick-is-suing-h_n_1119317.html sued a couple he took hostage]] in Kansas for breach of contract after they broke their promise to hide him from the police. Thankfully the ridiculous lawsuit was dismissed and [[http://cjonline.com/news/2013-06-06/dimmick-sentenced-37-years-colorado-murder Dimmick was sentenced]] to 11 years for the kidnapping and 37 years for second-degree murder.
* In Italian law, ''every'' lawsuit must go to a judge before being possibly dismissed, with ''no punishment whatsoever for it''. Thus Italian courts have an enormous backlog for things like a woman suing her daughter in law for not following the family (of the mother in law) recipe for a particular dish, or a stupid crook getting sued for attempting a bank robbery by the same people who foiled and beat him up.
* Filing a lot of these against a single person is in and of itself a crime, called "Litigious Harrassment".
* The VideoGame/{{Tetris}} Company owns the chiptune rendition of the Russian folk song ''Korobenieinki'' (Tetris track "A"), and files SLAPP suits against any game company that uses it, along with descending tetrominoes (those domino-like shapes the game is famous for). They'll even sue over things it's impossible to copyright for.
** The video game ''ZodasRevenge'' on the NES has the player tracking down magic Tetrads, which are in the shape of the classic Tetris blocks. Well aware of the Tetris company's history of the above lawsuits, the Tetrads were renamed "blocks" in the game's Virtual Console re-release on the Wii.
* The infamous "Superheated [=McDonald's=] Coffee" suit, often held high up as the epitome of this, is actually an {{aver|tedTrope}}sion. The facts of the case:
** The plaintiff, Stella Liebeck, was a 79-year-old Albuquerque, New Mexico resident who purchased coffee from the drive-thru of a local Mickey D's. She was riding in her grandson's car at the time, which had no cup holders, so she had to hold the coffee cup in her lap while attempting to add cream and sugar. She accidentally spilled the entire cup of coffee in her lap while attempting to undo the lid and happened to be wearing cotton sweatpants. Since cotton clothing absorbs liquids very easily, the hot coffee was held very close to her skin for several seconds, which produced a mix of second and third degree burns over roughly 22% of her skin in total (6% of her skin, including her buttocks and groin, suffered the third degree burns and required skin grafting to mend; 16% of her skin in surrounding areas suffered second degree burns).
** [=McDonald's=] refused several pre-trial attempts to settle for something closer to the projected total damages of twenty thousand dollars, calculated from the cost of medical expenses and lost income. They insisted upon settling for a measly eight hundred dollars, which would have been insufficient to cover Liebeck's losses.
** It was revealed in discovery (i.e. the phase of a suit in which the parties exchange evidence with each other and examine it) that [=McDonald's=] made serving its coffee at 180-190 degrees Fahrenheit mandatory, which meant the coffee was capable of causing serious burns in as little as seven to twelve seconds of continuous exposure, which is very possible if a plaintiff happened to be wearing cotton sweatpants. [=McDonald's=] had actually compensated several hundred other individuals for burns sustained by their coffee before Liebeck, yet found that number to be too small to consider altering company policy. Several other restaurants had no such policy, and instead served their coffee at temperatures ranging from 140-160 degrees. It was also revealed that while the coffee cups did have a warning attached, the warning was not sufficiently visible. Subsequent to the damage award, [=McDonald's=] increased the size of the warnings, made the cups sturdier, and started keeping its coffee at a lower temperature.
** Finally, Liebeck was awarded around $2.7 million by trial jury and was, in fact, deemed partially at fault, but the brunt of the initial award was in punitive damages. Following an appeal, the total amount awarded was projected to be around $610,000, and Liebeck and [=McDonald's=] reached an undisclosed settlement out of court.
** One P.S.: because Liebeck's troubles were caused by the fact that she had to hold her coffee between her thighs, many car companies realized that she could have easily sued the auto manufacturer (in that case, Ford) for failure to include cup holders. Thus, starting in the late 1990s, CupHolders have become standard equipment for most cars.
* This hasn't stopped others from trying to cash in on it too though, as seen when [[http://www.eater.com/2014/11/11/7193333/woman-sues-mcdonalds-coffee-burns-fake-photos one woman tried to sue McDonalds]] for hot coffee burns and was found to have copied the burn photos she attempted to use as proof off the internet. She's now facing 21 counts of felony insurance and workers' compensation fraud.
* Other people filed a lawsuit against [=McDonald's=] in 2016 over their mozzarella sticks not containing any cheese. It turns out overcooking the mozzarella sticks would cause the cheese to ooze out leaving only the outside breading. (This is therefore essentially an aversion, as the buyers would therefore most likely be reasonably entitled to sue for damages on theories of breach of contract or consumer fraud. However, given that the items are so cheap, they would at best be entitled to collect about $10-$20 depending on how generous the punitive-damages provisions of their local consumer protection laws are--not enough to justify the filing fees, let alone anything else.)
* UK-based and UsefulNotes/RupertMurdoch-owned broadcasting company [[Creator/{{Sky}} British Sky Broadcasting]] sued Microsoft over the name of their [=SkyDrive=] service, which they claimed was copyright infringement. Despite the questionable legality of the suit ([=BSkyB=] isn't in the cloud storage business and has no plans to enter it; furthermore, they only operate within the UK, Germany and Italy), Microsoft ended up having to change the name of their service to [=OneDrive=] to shut them up.
* Scenario: You order a Quarter Pounder at [=McDonald's=] and they only give you one napkin. [[http://kfor.com/2014/02/27/man-sues-mcdonalds-for-1-5-million-over-napkin-incident/ Solution:]] Sue [=McDonald's=] for $1.5 million, alleging that the incident has left you unable to work due to "undue mental anguish".
* In a case still under consideration (but which [[ForegoneConclusion will obviously be thrown out]]), Manhattan resident Anton Purisima is suing [[http://www.loweringthebar.net/2014/05/2-undecillion-dollar-demand.html New York City, the Au Bon Pain bakery, two local hospitals, Kmart and a "Latina" dog owner]] (apparently he tried to sue everyone he could think of) for two undecillion dollars (That's a two followed by ''thirty-six zeroes''. As Blog/WhatIf [[http://what-if.xkcd.com/96/ points out]], that's ''more than the value of everything ever produced in the history of mankind, plus the estimated worth of every animal, vegetable and mineral on the planet.'') He seeks damages for "civil rights violations, personal injury, discrimination on national origin, retaliation, harassment, fraud, attempted murder, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and conspiracy to defraud", making numerous absurd claims. [[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/17/man-sues-2-undecillion-_n_5343145.html The full story is here.]]
* [[http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/fan-who-fell-asleep-during-yankees-red-sox-game-suing-for--10-million-203033996.html A man fell asleep in the midst of a Yankees-Red Sox baseball game]], which the announcers noticed and commented on. A video of this was then published on the MLB's website, and the Internet, being the Internet, began making fun of him for it. The man decided to sue the MLB and ESPN over this, apparently believing they are the ones throwing the insults around. The lawsuit even calls out [[http://notsportscenter.com/pic-sleeping-yankees-fan-cares-not-for-your-rivalry-talk/ an apparent attempt to imply he's gay]], completely oblivious to the fact that this is from a ''parody website'' and not the MLB's site.
* A nurse by the name of [[http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/07/19/pro-lifer-sues-health-clinic-for-not-hiring-her-after-she-wouldnt-do-job-she-applied-for/ Sara Hellwege]] applied for a position at a family-planning clinic in [[OnlyInFlorida Tampa, Florida.]] She did not get the position. Why? She mentioned during the application process that she had moral objections to administering certain types of birth control, even though doing so would have explicitly been part of her duty. She claims that hormonal contraceptive methods (such as the Pill) are abortifacients.[[note]]An agent that induces abortion, which no, they are not, in case anyone's wondering. They work by preventing ovulation, and by altering the consistency of cervical mucus, making it harder for sperm to get through.[[/note]] (There were no positions available that would allow her to work there without having to administer birth control, or the methods she objected to.) That's right; she essentially told HR that she wouldn't be able to work if she were hired! She's now suing the clinic for religious discrimination.
* The maker of Candy Crush Saga sued the Banner Saga because of the word "saga", claiming that it could cause confusion and that the two games are closely related. See for yourself how closely [[http://cdn2.gamefront.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/BannerSaga3.jpg this]] is related to [[http://y8space.com/wp-content/thumbs/custom/C/Candy-Crush-Saga-Hack-Movements.png this]]. One is a viking strategy-rpg with a lot of blood and pillaging, the other is a causal game of clicking on glittering candies. Also, the word "saga" actually means a "viking heroic story", much more befitting a game about vikings. Still, the makers of Candy Crush Saga basically believe they own the words "candy" and "saga", and sue anyone who uses them even in completely unrelated games.
* The lawsuit against games journalist [[WebVideo/{{Jimquisition}} Jim Sterling]] by indie game developer Digital Homicide. A horrible game developer attempted to sue a critic and journalist for ''doing his job.'' Digital Homicide released several games on Steam that were all of particularly poor quality- often containing a litany of fundamental design flaws and massive bugs that went un-patched. They were also highly unethical- they've traded under fake studio names, tried to bypass Steam Greenlight's voting process, released identical games that were obvious palette swaps, re-released games on Greenlight multiple times to reset the game's negative votes, and released so many games that the average development time for each of their games was ''less than a month each''. Sterling reviewed all of their games negatively and reported about their assorted underhanded practices, and DH clashed with him multiple times; making such public asses of themselves that their games stopped selling. Digital Homicide then filed a lawsuit against Sterling for $10.7 million (later upped to $15 million) arguing that ''he is singularly responsible for the collapse of their entire business because he reviewed their games poorly.'' DH argued that ''everything Sterling ever said or printed about them was lies'' designed specifically by Sterling to demolish their business. [[note]]Most of the things DH is complaining about Sterling having said about them are very easily verifiable and Sterling is far from the only person to criticize them - he's just the most notable.[[/note]] The damages were listed as lost income (for the games they allege don't sell because of Sterling), slander, assault on character, and mental anguish.
** That "mental anguish" part is because Jim Sterling's fans have vigorously harassed them on Steam and even sent feces to their house. They sought to hold Jim personally responsible for his fans' harassment despite the fact that Jim has repeatedly and publicly pleaded with his viewers not to harass anybody on his behalf.
** In September 2016, Digital Homicide [[http://www.polygon.com/2016/9/17/12951756/digital-homicide-lawsuit-jim-sterling-steam-users-valve went further off the deep end]], filing a personal injury lawsuit against ''100 Steam users to the tune of nearly $18 million'' (all against accounts that have criticized them, reviewed their games poorly, and/or posted mean comments about them) - with the Prayer of Relief stating that should the case default or the judge find in favor of the plaintiff, then the plaintiff requests a court order stating that defendants that either reside outside of the United States or can't pay the fees ''have their Steam accounts permanently closed as recompense''. ''The day after'' the announcement for a subpoena ordering Valve to release the personal information of said 100 Steam users, Valve took an unprecedented step and '''completely purged Digital Homicide and all of their games from Steam'''. And they had good reason, as the proposed subpoena asked for enough information that the Romine brothers could potentially harass the defendants, ranging from trying to ruin their lives to ''outright hunting them down and killing them''. ''[[UpToEleven As if that wasn't enough]]'', they [[TooStupidToLive tried to sue Valve]] in response to being blacklisted. On September 27 Digital Homicide themselves filed to have the lawsuit dismissed, [[UnreliableNarrator claiming the damages inflicted have left them too broke to afford subpoenas to the defendents.]] They've since gone out of business.
*** It gets better/worse. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKIAPR6D5FQ A YouTube discussion about the lawsuit reveals]] that most of the legalese within the 58-page lawsuit document is ''[[https://youtu.be/UKIAPR6D5FQ?t=1h23m17s so damn thoroughly vague and broad]]'' that the range of defendants could encompass anywhere from the entirety of the Steam userbase to ''[[https://youtu.be/UKIAPR6D5FQ?t=1h25m everyone that is currently working in, has worked in, and will possibly work in the video game industry]], up to and including everyone who works with video games such as reviewers and YouTube content creators''. [[note]]They stated in assorted interviews that they were convinced that an unknown third party and competitor was behind all of their negative reviews and bad press; standing to profit from their downfall and loss of business. They may have purposefully left the lawsuit open in the hope they'd discover this conspirator's identity.[[/note]]
** Digital Homicide's initial lawsuit was thrown out because James Romine filed as an individual but listed damages against a company. Romine amended the lawsuit with a few new charges: that Sterling was a competitor with motive to drive Digital Homicide out of business[[note]] Jim provides voicework for games on occasion[[/note]], that Sterling prevented them from changing accounts and somehow cost them 2 million dollars in destroyed product, and that Romine has been donating a dollar to Sterling's Patreon each month to prove Sterling does business in Arizona.[[note]]Romine was desperate to get the case tried in Arizona, where he'd still be able to sue Sterling for defaming statements that had been corrected.[[/note]]
** On February 21, 2017- almost a year after the lawsuit began- James Romine filed to have the lawsuit dismissed with prejudice- meaning Digital Homicide cannot file the lawsuit again. According to Sterling his lawyer met with Romine, laid out their strategy for the case, and convinced Romine that ''he'd be hopelessly screwed if the case actually made it to court.''
* Red Bull once settled a class-action lawsuit out of court. The reason the lawsuit came about in the first place? According to Benjamin Careathers, the man who led the charge in filing suit, "consumers of the drink did not benefit from any mental or physical enhancements, though the product states in its advertisement that it 'gives you wings'." Yeah. They sued Red Bull because, shocker of shockers, it doesn't actually give you wings. And this is ignoring that "actually, Red Bull [what energy drinks are supposed to do]" could be construed as a disclaimer.
* Three examples from Poland:
** A local Polish company named a.pl was sued by Apple because of similarity in names; the Apple lawyers argued that the two companies are "easy to get confused". That's right - [[SarcasmMode it's hard to distinguish a local company specializing in delivering fresh fruits and vegetables to stores from an internationally-known megacorporation dabbling in electronics.]] The case never made it to the court.
** Similarly, Red Bull threatened to sue a charity organization, because it is named "Give the Children Wings", while Red Bull's slogan is "Gives You Wings". Someone in the company must have noticed that suing a charity organization that operates on a strictly non-profit basis and helps poor children is not necessarily the smartest PR move, because Red Bull withdrew their suit.
** A truly stunning 2011 case. When a movie called ''Kac Wawa'' was released, it was completely reviled by the critics [[note]]It currently holds a 1.7/10 note on the biggest Polish film database - the lowest recorded for a major cinema release[[/note]], and as a result, the audiences stayed away and the movie flopped severely [[note]]It was later awarded "The Worst Use Of 3D Technique" by a major British magazine[[/note]]. As a result, the producers tried to sue one of the movie's major detractors, the famed critic Tomasz Raczek, to compensate for their financial losses. No attorney was crazy enough to pick up the case.
* A woman in Seattle was sued by her neighbor for several hundred thousand dollars because her dog's barking caused him mental anguish and also caused him hearing damage as the barking reached volumes of 120 decibels. (That's louder than an ambulance siren and only slightly softer than a jet engine during takeoff). The woman ignored the lawsuit- since it was obviously frivolous and would never stand up in court- and the neighbor ''won the suit by default'' because she didn't respond. Now she's at risk of losing her home and it's going to take some ''serious'' legal fees for lawyers to overturn the lawsuit[[note]]The actual default can be waived pretty easily - all that you have to do is file a motion to set aside a default judgment, and if the motion isn't obviously frivolous, the court will usually grant it. It's drafting the motion that can be costly - while motions themselves are almost always copied with minor alterations, Mad Libs-style, from a preexisting template, few laypeople have access to law books or other sources of those templates and have to rely on attorneys to do it for them. A motion written by an ordinary citizen will likely lack crucial elements and be thrown out.[[/note]].
* ''[[https://casetext.com/case/general-steel-domestic-sales-v-denverboulder-bbb General Steel Domestic Sales, Inc. v. Denver/Boulder Better Business Bureau]]'', Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-01145-DME-KMT, (Consolidated with Case No. 07-cv-02170). (D. Colo. Mar. 2, 2009): A company that produced prefabricated steel buildings was investigated by California and Colorado authorities for deceptive sales practices (the buildings were fine, but the company misrepresented some important characteristics) under their respective states' consumer protection laws after receiving complaints from dissatisfied customers; these authorities sue. What does the company do? Sue the authorities, the consumers, the Better Business Bureau (which had taken complaints and directed consumers to the authorities), a competitor founded by a disgruntled former employee, and several media outlets for "conspiracy"[[note]]For American legal nerds: The suit was under civil RICO. To non-American legal nerds: RICO is a very complicated statute originally intended to bring down TheMafia but which now can be used for almost anything, as long as you have an underlying tort or crime and a group of people somehow connected to the commission of the tort or crime. Civil RICO is when the underlying cause of action is a tort.[[/note]] to make it ''appear'' that the company was violating consumer protection laws. The funny thing is that because the conspiracy laws are so complicated, this technically ''wasn't'' a frivolous suit--it's too hard to prove that they didn't have a chance. That said, when the judge in the case brought by the Colorado authorities made his ruling, he said it was "obvious" that the company had violated the law--something judges don't say lightly when there's parallel litigation on the issue, basically amounting to saying "[[CouldSayItBut I could say that the other suit is frivolous]], but I won't because that wouldn't be ''quite'' right."
* Harmony Gold, Western publishers of ''Anime/{{Robotech}}'', was at one time an industry giant riding high on the popularity of their licensed material. They also initially sued several other franchises (Hasbro staple ''Franchise/TheTransformers'' and FASA's front runner ''TabletopGame/BattleTech'') for using the designs of mecha that were originally from ''Anime/SuperDimensionFortressMacross'', even though those uses had been licensed from the original Japanese rights holders[[note]]Or at least believed that they had; in the case of FASA, it was shown that the company which had licensed the rights, 20th Century Imports, did not in fact have any connection to the actual rights holders. FASA settled out of court with Harmony Gold in 1997, and mooted a fraud suit against TCI afterwards.[[/note]]. It proved too expensive for Hasbro and FASA to keep fighting, so they settled and effectively {{UnPerson}}ed the offending products. Problem is, when the Japanese courts went and took a look at it, they ruled that Harmony Gold's rights weren't license rights for ''Anime/{{Macross}}''-derived work, but ''distribution'' rights. In other words, Harmony Gold can sell all the ''Macross''-based product it wants (or doesn't want), but had no legal power to say who could or could not use images from ''Macross'' in the West under new names. Creator/StudioNue, the original license holder, could tell the other Western companies to stop, but seem to have no inclination to do so. Harmony Gold continues to try to sue anyway, targeting Hasbro in 2013 over a ''Franchise/GIJoe'' vehicle that loosely resembles a Valkyrie in fighter mode (which just so happens to look like an F-14 Tomcat fighter, a vehicle already in the G.I. Joe armory). The difference is that Harmony Gold is now such a small and thoroughly despised fish in the market that even the owners of ''Battletech'', a franchise that's been handed off no less than four times, look down on them, to say nothing of international toy giants like Hasbro. Reportedly, Hasbro's lawyers sat down with Harmony Gold's, showed them the 30-years-ancient G.I. Joe products they were updating (and that Harmony Gold had not thought to sue over before) and asked if they ''really'' wanted this to be taken to a public court. Harmony Gold sheepishly cut its losses and dropped the suit.
* [[http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2015/05/06/watch-nebraska-woman-suing-all-homosexuals-behalf-god A woman in Nebraska]] filed papers to sue ''all homosexuals'' on behalf of ''God'' for supposedly breaking Christian religious law. This is undoubtedly in response to the United States taking steps toward legalizing gay marriage nationwide. 66-year-old Sylvia Ann Driskell is not seeking any monetary payment, but wants the courts to determine whether or not homosexuality is a sin. She cites no laws in her petition, handwritten on ''notebook paper'' and riddled with spelling and grammar errors (even if she did, the US Supreme Court struck down all remaining anti-sodomy bans in 2003), but does cite numerous Bible verses. In other words, her petition was a seven-page homophobic rant. To the surprise of nobody, case was quickly dismissed on the grounds that there was no demand for relief, no particularized injury, no specifically identified defendant (citing Mayo vs. Satan, listed above), and that the court has no interest or authority in engaging in theological debate. To add insult to more insult, the official record of the case [[YouMakeMeSic retains all the spelling and grammar errors in the letter]] and thus the case is recorded as:
--> '''Plaintiff'''\\
I Sylvia Ann Driskell\\
''Ambassador for Plaintiff's God, and His, Son, Jesus Christ''\\
''Their Given Name Homosexuals Their, Alis Gay''
* Actor James Woods [[http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107 filed a defamation lawsuit]] for $10 million against a Twitter user with the handle "Abe List" who alleged that Woods has a cocaine addiction. This is unlikely to go anywhere since: first, due to Twitter's anonymity he doesn't actually know who "Abe List" is so he cannot name a defendant; second, Woods is a public figure so he needs to prove malice and damages, meaning he must produce evidence of some tangible way his career or reputation suffered as a result of the tweet and prove that this was "AL's" intention, which is almost impossible; finally, Woods himself has used Twitter to attack others, including outright accusing Al Sharpton of being responsible for the deaths of two cops, so if he does win he leaves himself open to a barrage of counter-suits.
* As of 2015, a Portland, Oregon woman is [[https://gma.yahoo.com/woman-claims-she-daughter-autism-were-kicked-off-151716493--abc-news-topstories.html suing United Airlines, Inc.]] after she and her 15 year old autistic daughter were removed from a flight because, as she put it, the pilot felt uncomfortable with an autistic child being on the plane. However, a number of people on social media, especially on news outlets' Facebook pages, seem to think the suit reeks of frivolous lawsuit, speculating that the real reason the flight was diverted was because the woman had made threats to crewmembers[[note]]As some evidence seems to suggest, the mother seemed to have threatened crewmembers that if the child did not get a 'hot meal' from first class right away (for the record, flight attendants are typically not allowed to serve food from the first class cabin in other ticketed cabins), then the child would flip out and begin 'scratching' other people, meaning the pilot was diverting in the interest of the safety of the other 140 something passengers on the flight. Some on social media also put blame on the mother for not making sure her 15 year old was properly fed before boarding. And some also state that it's very likely United might seek damages by countersuing the woman for the costs of diverting the flight.[[/note]]
* [[http://www.palmerreiflerlaw.com/ Palmer, Reifler & Associates, P.A.]] have made careers out of threatening convicted shoplifters with lawsuits for many times the value of whatever they stole and the fines they already paid. Often without even contacting the store that was stolen from. They either settle out of court or get ignored since there is no court order attached. [[https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110825192753AAOllNK But they keep harassing people with larger and larger sums for months]].
* Website/NotAlwaysRight has had some demonstrations of this. Almost every lawsuit threatened in any story will turn out to be frivolous:
** [[http://notalwaysright.com/hes-gonna-need-a-huge-courtroom/1295 This guy]] wants to sue a town. Not the town government, but the town itself and everyone in it. By the look of things, he appeared to be under the impression that "Boise Idaho" (without a comma) was a company and not a town.
** [[http://notalwaysright.com/hes-the-best-actor-of-the-bunch/32334 This guy]], every year, goes to a family's haunted house, comes out bruised, and sues them for it, never winning from a lack of evidence but wasting a lot of their money nonetheless. He eventually gets his when they install security cameras and catch him injuring himself - his case is immediately thrown out with that evidence, and the family promptly counter-sues him for three times what he wanted from them, making back nearly every penny they had lost fighting his lawsuits.
** [[http://notalwaysright.com/only-slipping-on-the-truth/34192 This elderly lady]] blatantly pretends to have slipped on something wet and threatens to contact her lawyer - after basically proving she made it up, by trying to "recreate" the incident by making movements she could not possibly have done if she were actually injured. Because of this and the presence of security cameras, the manager gives her the store's information in the hopes that she goes through with the lawsuit so he can then get her put in jail over it.
** [[http://notalwaysright.com/the-cake-is-a-lie-part-3/25165 This woman]] attempts this, when she enters a bakery and asks them to create a wedding cake and bill her for it, totally ignoring the submitter's insistence that they don't sell cakes or send bills out before she leaves; naturally, none of what she asks for is accomplished. She then begins sending attorneys to the bakery, apparently oblivious to the reason why they all immediately drop her case against the bakery, and ends up going through ''four'' of them, probably wasting thousands or even millions of dollars in the process, before she gives up (or, less charitably, before she gets enough of a bad rep amongst attorneys that they won't take her case, goes pro se, and winds up being declared a vexatious litigant).
** [[https://notalwaysright.com/standards-falling-really-falling/63665 This elderly woman]] tried to scam a department store by faking a slip-and-fall accident. The CCTV footage immediately disqualifies her claims.
* [[Music/{{Deicide}} Eric Hoffman]] decided to sue Steve Asheim for unpaid publishing royalties on ''Scars of the Crucifix'' shortly after he quit, claiming that he had written the entire album and should be paid accordingly. The problem was that this was complete and utter bullshit; Asheim had written the vast majority of the album, and during the discovery process, Asheim handed over a teaching video that he had recorded to demonstrate to Eric how to play his parts ''that Asheim had written''. Eric Hoffman's lawyer subsequently relieved himself of his duty because continuing to represent someone for a case that was now obviously frivolous would be a serious ethics violation, and Eric dropped the case immediately after.
* In August 2015, just about a year after UsefulNotes/{{NASCAR}} driver Tony Stewart accidentally ran over and killed Kevin Ward, Jr. during a sprint car race during the Watkins Glen race weekend, the [[http://nascartalk.nbcsports.com/2015/08/07/breaking-wrongful-death-lawsuit-filed-against-tony-stewart/?utm_network=facebook&utm_post=4048756 Ward family filed suit against Stewart]]. A large number of NASCAR fans, even those who aren't Stewart fans, call bullshit on the Ward family's claims, pointing to the fact that the reason Stewart wasn't indicted for Ward's death was because it was proven that Ward was under the influence of marijuana, and the area of the track where he was hit was not very well lit, which, combined with Ward's black firesuit, almost made him invisible.
* Lambert's Café in Ozark, Missouri prides itself as "Home of the Throwed Rolls". That is to say, they serve you your dinner rolls by throwing them across the room. [[http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/08/14/woman-hit-roll-sues-restaurant-lamberts-cafe-home-throwed-roll Now they're being sued for $25,000 by a woman]] who alleges that one of their dinner rolls hit her in the head and caused her to receive a lacerated cornea. Some pointed out that even if the injury is true, the odds of her winning are low by pointing to the "baseball rule," saying that since the slogan "Home of the Throwed" was posted in several locations, she assumed the risk.
* Kim Davis - the Kentucky clerk infamous for attempting to prevent her entire office from providing marriage licenses by using "religious faith" as her defense (after the Supreme Court upheld gay marriage rights)- has tried and failed several times to get several levels of courts to support her religious rights to stop all licenses from being issued. She then decided to sue Governor Steve Beshear for failing to protect her religious liberty. Considering that every single appeal has failed because trying to effectively shut down a public office is ''not at all how religious liberty is supposed to work'', this probably would have failed too. However, Beshear's term ended in 2015 and the new governor, Matt Bevin, signed an executive order eliminating the county clerks' names from state marriage licenses. As such, Davis has dropped her suit and the lawsuits against ''her'' have been dropped as well since the issue is now moot. (In incredible irony, a not-so-frivolous lawsuit was filed by Creator/{{Survivor}} against Mike Huckabee, her largest supporter, for non-consensual use of their song, "Eye of the Tiger". [[http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/27/news/mike-huckabee-eye-of-the-tiger/index.html Huckabee settled for $25,000.]])
* Men's Rights Activists in California have filed numerous lawsuits against women-only events, professional groups and social clubs, [[http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/01/men-rights-unruh-act-women-discrimination ranging from]] mother's day promotions to networking events for female business owners. Since California's anti-discrimination laws are so broadly worded, they often win because the defendants technically are engaged in gender discrimination (in the same way that a man-only event would be such and hence could and would be attacked by "feminists"), and, since the law also forces unsuccessful defendants to pay plaintiff's legal fees, they've cost a lot of people a lot of money.
* When Creator/MichaelJackson released "Billy Jean", he was sued by a woman who was actually named Billy Jean Jackson, claiming the song had been written to mock her. why? She claimed she ''was'' his lover, that Jackson had married her, and also the mother of his first child. (Jackson never revealed who Blanket's mother was, claiming it had been a surrogate). She sued for £668 million (that's over a billion U.S. dollars) joint custody, and a say in Blanket's education. A blood test easily proved she was lying, so ironically, the lyrics of the song were AccidentallyAccurate when claiming "she's just a girl who says that I am the one".
* Frivolous lawsuits involving TakingAdvantageOfGenerosity have become a problem in China, in which people who injure themselves in public, if someone helps them, either sues the person who helped them, accusing them of hurting them in the first place, in hopes of getting money; or will milk their hospital stay for as long as they can and send the bill to the person who helped them. It's gotten to where shipping company Alibaba has created "[[http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-china-good-samaritans-20151020-story.html Good Samaritan insurance]]," where someone who's covered, if they're struck by a situation like this, will receive legal assistance from Alibaba to fight back.
* You get a $1.50 Kit Kat bar that happens to not have the wafers inside it, so you basically get a chocolate bar. What do you do? [[http://ibt.uk/A6SyH Demand a lifetime's supply of Kit Kat bars,]] that's what you do!
* There is a small Turkish town that is named Batman and has decided to try and leverage its rather infamous name for profit at least once. It tried to sue Warner Brothers over ''TheDarkKnight'' for using its name without asking and claimed the movie led to a series of unsolved murders and a high rate of female suicides; demanding a share of the royalties from the highly successful movie. The lawsuit was not successful.
* In an obvious case of frivolousness, [[http://www.azfamily.com/story/31550031/loughner-suing-giffords-for-emotional-psychological-distress Tuscon mass shooter Jared Lee Loughner]] is allegedly trying to sue Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, the woman he shot; claiming that the shooting was a setup and his original lawyer was a global spy that forced him to plead guilty, and furthermore claims that make him sound like an insane conspiracy theorist, like: Loughner is innocent and was hand-picked to be an assassin, Giffords was never shot and learned to act the part by watching Ronald Reagan movies[[note]]like the one where a man tries to impress Jodie Foster by shooting Reagan[[/note]], Loughner is being waterboarded every day by agents from the NSA, CIA and ATF, microchips have been placed in his head and he is the victim of a worldwide conspiracy; Giffords is part of the Illuminati, a supposed secret organization of the most powerful people in the world; Loughner is being targeted with chemtrails, which have made him sick and delusional; Giffords help set up rancher Cliven Bundy; Mark Kelly, Giffords' husband and a former American astronaut, planted illegal spy equipment in the skies to spy on Americans. However, it looks like a hoax because it has some similarities to a hoax suit allegedly filed earlier in March by Uber mass shooter Jason Brian Dalton; namely, that both have the same three stamps in the top right corner, have similar handwriting and are postmarked in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
* In a particularly nasty example of such a lawsuit actually winning, Canadian "feminist" Stephanie Guthrie sued an artist from Toronto named Gregory Alan Elliott for disagreeing with her on ''Website/{{Twitter}}'', went to the judge and, yes, won it. The punishment for the guy was being ''barred from the internet'' by virtue of being forbidden to own any kind of device with internet connectivity until he was acquitted on all charges in January 2016, over 3 years later. Stephanie herself was banned from twitter, and there is rumblings of a counter-suit.
* Families of several of the victims of both the 2012 Aurora Colorado theater shooting and the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting have filed a lawsuit against Bushmaster, the maker of one of the firearms used in both shootings. The claims of both is that the firearms used in both occasions, a semiautomatic AR-15 is not legal for civilian use. The fact is actually that an AR-15 is legal for civilian ownership and use. There is also a law in America that prevents gun and ammunition manufacturers from being sued for criminal misuse of their products. In the case of the Aurora suit a judge threw out the case citing this law, but in the Sandy Hook case the suit was allowed to go forward because of the (false) claim that the AR-15 was not protected by the protection law because it is not a legal weapon. The lawsuit did finally get tossed by a State Appeals Court in Connecticut on October 14, 2016.
** In the Aurora case, the families also sued Cinemark Theaters, who owned the theater where the shooting happened, on the grounds that they failed to provide adequate security to prevent the shooting. That case not only failed (in part because the plaintiffs decided to ignore the judge's recommendations of taking a settlement, and because it was ruled that Cinemark was not responsible for unforeseen circumstances like a mentally ill gunman), but Cinemark countersued the families of the victims to pay for the damages that the lawsuit caused them.
* [[http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/nation-now/2016/05/04/woman-sues-starbucks-5-million-ice-chilled-coffee-tea/83920832/ A woman sues Starbucks Coffee for $5 million]], claiming the company short-changes customers by filling chilled beverages with too much ice. Starbucks immediately fired back in a press statement that the suit has no merit. Ultimately dismissed with prejudice by the judge.
* Jodee Berry of Panama, Florida sues her employer for promising her a Toyota for winning a beer sales contest, and delivering [[spoiler: a [[http://imgur.com/fI9JZpY Toy Yoda.]] And she won a settlement.]]
* The use of frivolous lawsuits (and countersuits) has become the ''raison d'être'' of innumerable litigants, as seen above - but the 'sovereign citizen' movements[[labelnote:Explanation]]people who basically believe that the codified laws of today are illegitimate and only common law prevails[[/labelnote]], such as Posse Comitatus, Freeman-On-The-Land, and Moorish Law, take it to new heights, as described by an Alberta judge in the judgement for the 2012 suit [[http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012abqb571.html Meads v. Meads]]. The judicial officer in question gleefully enters SarcasmMode at the start of the almost [[DoorStopper 200-page long document]], and the feeling that they're fed up with the whole situation doesn't let up at any point.
* A Tennessee family sued Amazon.com after a hoverboard they purchased from the site in January of 2016 burned their house down after the battery exploded. In Tennessee the seller of a product can be held liable for damage if the manufacturer is not found and the hoverboard was made by a generic Chinese manufacturer. The lawsuit claims Amazon knew about the product's dangers ahead of the sale but failed to mention it on their website.
* Emerald White, a pitbull owner from Texas, [[http://www.inquisitr.com/1662879/emerald-white-pit-bull-owner-whose-dogs-attacked-and-killed-family-pet-will-not-sue-victims/ sued a family who's pet beagle was killed by her two pitbulls]]. She claimed she suffered “multiple serious bite and scratch-type injuries requiring ongoing medical treatment” while alleging that she felt “conscious pain and suffering and now suffers also from fear anxiety and trepidation” as a result of the “unprovoked attack.”
* In the early 1980s, the tea company Tetley sued the trading card producer Topps over a ''WackyPackages'' sticker parodying them as "Petley Flea Bags", fearing that it would confuse buyers and damage sales, in addition to claiming the image was copyright infringement. Topps easily won the case because it was ruled obvious that it was not endorsed by Tetley, as well as that it couldn't have a negative impact on Tetley because tea and trading cards don't have the same audience. In the same lawsuit, Tetley also tried to argue that Topps was breaking the law by ''inserting random cards into a pack'', an essential feature of a collectible card series; this arguement was also rejected.
* A man sued a woman he went on a blind date with for $17.34 to cover the cost of the movie tickets after she got up and walked out of the theater when he asked her to stop texting during the movie. The woman claims her date was acting narcissistic and rude, which made her uncomfortable and motivated her to ditch him.