12th Mar: Page-bottom layout change on the way. Details here. Causes no change to editing/formatting of articles. This is just FYI.
A character establishing or upholding prejudice in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary
Rolling Updates * Needs More Examples
Call this an unfair generalization if you must, but old people are no good at everything.
--Moe Syzlack, The Simpsons, when Mr. Burns wants to join the bowling teamBob knows that Alice is stupid: She's a woman (or a non-white, or whatever), and women are stupid - never mind that Alice got a PHD and 150 IQ, she's still a woman... and women are stupid, thus Alice is stupid. If Bob finally accept that Alice is indeed smart, he might resort to claiming that she is not "really" a woman. Bonus points if Bob use Alice not being stupid as an example of the principle that women are stupid - either because she's too smart to be a real woman, or as "the exception that verifies the rule". Also bonus points if "Alice" isn't even a woman, and Bob simply assumed a neutral Internet nickname to be female because he thinks the person is stupid. Alternatively, Alice actually do something stupid one single time - and Bob draws the conclusion that she is (and all other women are) always stupid. Of course, this is all simply Bob doing some really bad categorism: Racism if it's about race, sexism if it's about gender, ageism if it's about age, homophobia if it's about homosexuals, and so on. If Alice listen too much to him, she may come to suffer from Internalized Categorism. This trope can come into play in two ways: Either establishing or upholding. The first is often in the form of making a raging overgeneralization about a group - one that cannot possibly be true in all cases, and is often so outrageous that it might even be hard to find a valid example. The second is upholding the prejudice in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Often with the help of Theory Tunnel Vision, Insane Troll Logic and/or I Reject Your Reality. Sometimes combined with Straw Affiliation to make it extra insane: If you have Trait X you belong to group Y, and everyone in group Y are Z. For example, if you are a man who has long hair, you obviously turn over gravestones and nail live kittens to church doors. Because men with long hair are satanists, and satanists do that kind of stuff. Compare Nonsense Classification and Insane Troll Logic. When used by characters rather than the narrative itself, tropes such as Depraved Homosexual, Bondage Is Bad and All Gays Are Pedophiles are often played as aggressive categorism. With the first two tropes, this come in the form of reducing people to their sexuality and reducing the sexuality to the sex. With the last two tropes, it comes in the form of deciding that everyone who have quality X (In this case gay or sadomasochist) also has the unrelated quality Y (in this case pedophile or generally bad person). Often done by Racist Grandma, He-Man Woman Hater, Windmill Crusader, Straw Loser or Noble Bigot, and often used to highlight how shallow the character's thinking is. This is often Played for Laughs on the character's expense or as a joke in it's own right. Rarely done by more nuanced andf Played for Drama characters such as Troubled Sympathetic Bigot. Note that "There Are Two Kinds of People in the World" is usually not this: Even when it's not a joke or metaphor, it's usually restricted to one parameter.