It\'s a page describing what is essentially a very violent form of DIY fetish porn. I have heard that the term is sometimes used fairly broadly to encompass catfight videos and the like, but apparently the true definition literally just refers to videos of female characters dying horribly framed in a sexualised fashion, and that is what the article describes. Why is this still on the wiki?
While the page has been marked for mature audiences, the Rules universe is said to be \"yaoi\", when it was written it may not have been so, but now the difference between \"yaoi\" (blatant porn in most cases.) and \"shonen-ai\" (Things like Loveless) are important to us.
The tropes seem to support the yaoi comment, but since we\'re dealing with a Universe here, not one work, it might be one or two scenes spread throughout the work. Sorry for making a lot of work for you. - The One Who Tropes.
It\'s not sexually explicit, but you might want to take a look at this page.
The tone seems kind of positive, but the comic described portrays rape, and the enslavement of an ostensibly straight black couple by the white title character for sexual purposes, as though these things are funny, sexy and cute.
Will PROBABLY pass, but the ambiguous ages in the pic and the reference to shotacon means it gets a report and closer look. Seems okay in regard to having a plot, needs to be checked for pedo-pandering.
Protagonists are high schoolers and drawn \"chibi\" style. This one depends on how graphic the sex is and what the intended audience is (is it adults, or older teens? If it\'s adults it probably needs to be removed. If it\'s aimed at older teen fangirls in Japan, it can probably stay.)
It\'s about porn stars, and they have sex and lots of it, but there is a plot and it\'s basically Slice of Life in the gay porn industry in Japan. I don\'t know if the \"characters are porn stars dealing with the AV industry\" pushes it over the edge into P5 banning or not. IMO, it\'s Porn with Plot about porn, so... reported so we can all discuss whether its plot allows it to stay, or that the whole thing is about porn means it goes.
First of all, haven\'t actually read it, so I don\'t know how explicit it is. Second, it\'s BizarroFiction. But I thought that a work which had babies used for anal sex might (and it\'s said to be common in the setting) might need a check just to be sure? I apologize in advance for any unnecessary work, sanity damage or liver damage the evaluation may cause.
The story itself involves, mentions repeatedly, and portrays on several occasions what is essentially pseudo-bestiality between sapient ponies and feral humans (who at best display the intelligence of a young child, but more often act about as intelligent as any other animal).
Moreover, this is not portrayed negatively by the narrative. The author has been made well aware of the implications, and has disregarded them.
While the protagonist himself is intelligent enough to provide consent, somehow I doubt a bestiality fic is what TVT wants to be promoting...