Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: The game is rated E for everyone in North America and PEGI +3 in Europe, but it has a lot of NightmareFuel that could scare younger viewers.
to:
* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: The game is rated E for everyone in North America America[[note]] at the time the E10+ rating didn't exist until 2 years later[[/note]] and PEGI +3 3+ in Europe, but it has a lot of NightmareFuel (such as the [[JumpScare Jump Scares]] at the hall of heads) that could scare younger viewers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* UncertainAudience: Some attribute the game's initial failure due to the unfortunate timing of being the first Rare title released right after being bought out by Microsoft and being on the Xbox, whose signature Rare style didn't exactly line up with the tastes of the Xbox audience. Many theorize if ''Ghoulies'' just came out a year earlier before the buyout, it would've been on the ''Platform/NintendoGamecube'', where it likely would have even better received.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When Ghoulies was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales of the game were very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn't help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], even those at Rare, overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare came to light, the game's reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviewers like the ones on [=YouTube=], not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When Ghoulies was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales of the game were very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn't help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], even those at Rare, overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare came to light, the game's reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviewers like the ones on [=YouTube=], not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.enjoyable.
------
------
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When Ghoulies was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales of the game were very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], even those at Rare, overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviewers like the ones on [=YouTube=], not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When Ghoulies was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales of the game were very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], even those at Rare, overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, Rare came to light, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviewers like the ones on [=YouTube=], not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When Ghoulies was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales of the game were very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], even those at Rare, overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviewers like the ones on {{YouTube}}, not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When Ghoulies was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales of the game were very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], even those at Rare, overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviewers like the ones on {{YouTube}}, [=YouTube=], not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When Ghoulies was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales of the game were very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], even those at Rare, overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When Ghoulies was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales of the game were very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], even those at Rare, overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, reviewers like the ones on {{YouTube}}, not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When Ghoulies was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales of the game were very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When Ghoulies was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales of the game were very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], even those at Rare, overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game Ghoulies was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales well of the game were very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named reviewers, who were still critical of the game like IGN.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences.[[/note]] sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named reviewers, gaming outlets like IGN, who were still critical of the game like IGN.game.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]] sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named reviewers, who were still critical of the game,[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]] Sciences.[[/note]] sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named reviewers, who were still critical of the game,[[/note]] game like IGN.[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named reviewers, who were still critical of the game[[/note]], found it to be very enjoyable.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], Sciences[[/note]] sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named reviewers, who were still critical of the game[[/note]], game,[[/note]] found it to be very enjoyable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers found it to be very enjoyable.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, many reviewers reviewers[[note]]Internet reviews, not big named reviewers, who were still critical of the game[[/note]], found it to be very enjoyable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, and many reviewers found it to be very enjoyable.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, and many reviewers found it to be very enjoyable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime.overtime, when the game was rereleased on Xbox Live on the 360 in 2009, it received a 3.75 out of 5, in 2015, when it was rereleased a second time on Rare Replay, and many reviewers found it to be very enjoyable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDepreciation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDepreciation [[SelfDeprecation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: The game is rated E for everyone in North America and PEGI +3 in Europe, but it has a lot of NightmareFuel that could scare younger viewers.
to:
* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: The game is rated E for everyone in North America and PEGI +3 in Europe, but it has a lot of NightmareFuel that could scare younger viewers.viewers.
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDepreciation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime.
* VindicatedByHistory: When this game was originally released, it received mixed reviews across the board, [[note]]Although the graphics and style were well received, and the game even got two nominations at Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences[[/note]], sales well very bad, (especially since the game came almost a year after Microsoft purchased Rare, which didn’t help the game) and was the subject of [[SelfDepreciation ridicule]], overtime however, especially since the realization of Nintendo not purchasing Rare, the game’s reputation has positively improved overtime.
