Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
%%* JerkassWoobie: Oskar.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
- Or rather, a later work (since it's a series, not a film). Still, the point remains.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hiding ZCE. A later film also having a similar premise is not really "hindsight", and it certainly isn't hilarious, given the subject matter.
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: The film was released shortly before the premiere of ''Series/Touch2012'', which ''also'' featured an ambiguously autistic boy who lost a parent in the September 11th attacks, although the 9/11 connection wasn't mentioned as prominently there.
* JerkassWoobie: Oskar.
* JerkassWoobie: Oskar.
to:
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Defunct trope
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: A story about an [[AmbiguousDisorder ambiguously autistic]] child that is not far off from being portrayed as a CreepyChild who lost his father in the September 11 attacks, which was a recent event during the book's publication, and has a B-plot of the life of his grandparents at UsefulNotes/NaziGermany. Gee, what's not to love here?
to:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: A story about an [[AmbiguousDisorder ambiguously autistic]] autistic child that is not far off from being portrayed as a CreepyChild who lost his father in the September 11 attacks, which was a recent event during the book's publication, and has a B-plot of the life of his grandparents at UsefulNotes/NaziGermany. Gee, what's not to love here?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Uncanny Valley is IUEO now and the subjective version has been split; cleaning up misuse and ZCE in the process
Deleted line(s) 5 (click to see context) :
* UncannyValley: The [[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/fd/Extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close_film_poster.jpg film adaptation's poster]] was accused of this, probably because the images of the kid's face and hands seem to have come from separate shots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: The film was released shortly before the premiere of ''Series/{{Touch}}'', which ''also'' featured an ambiguously autistic boy who lost a parent in the September 11th attacks, although the 9/11 connection wasn't mentioned as prominently there.
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: The film was released shortly before the premiere of ''Series/{{Touch}}'', ''Series/Touch2012'', which ''also'' featured an ambiguously autistic boy who lost a parent in the September 11th attacks, although the 9/11 connection wasn't mentioned as prominently there.
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* UncannyValley: The [[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/fd/Extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close_film_poster.jpg film adaptation's poster]] was accused of this, probably because the images of the kid's face and hands seem to have come from separate shots.
to:
* UncannyValley: The [[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/fd/Extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close_film_poster.jpg film adaptation's poster]] was accused of this, probably because the images of the kid's face and hands seem to have come from separate shots.shots.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I replaced a link which didn't work.
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* UncannyValley: The [[http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.impawards.com/2011/posters/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.impawards.com/2011/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close.html&h=755&w=510&sz=133&tbnid=pEQXL6iAIc47JM:&tbnh=98&tbnw=66&zoom=1&usg=__FIkoFFwSayJPC9WzsqW4uS2zg28=&docid=yrOprq8M-x82DM&sa=X&ei=Jq6wUPY3rumJAtHFgZgP&ved=0CDMQ9QEwAA&dur=1328 film adaptation's poster]] was accused of this, probably because the images of the kid's face and hands seem to have come from separate shots.
to:
* UncannyValley: The [[http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.impawards.com/2011/posters/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.impawards.com/2011/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close.html&h=755&w=510&sz=133&tbnid=pEQXL6iAIc47JM:&tbnh=98&tbnw=66&zoom=1&usg=__FIkoFFwSayJPC9WzsqW4uS2zg28=&docid=yrOprq8M-x82DM&sa=X&ei=Jq6wUPY3rumJAtHFgZgP&ved=0CDMQ9QEwAA&dur=1328 [[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/fd/Extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close_film_poster.jpg film adaptation's poster]] was accused of this, probably because the images of the kid's face and hands seem to have come from separate shots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added example
Added DiffLines:
* HilariousInHindsight: The film was released shortly before the premiere of ''Series/{{Touch}}'', which ''also'' featured an ambiguously autistic boy who lost a parent in the September 11th attacks, although the 9/11 connection wasn't mentioned as prominently there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Now a disambiguation
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: A story about an [[AmbiguousDisorder ambiguously autistic]] child that is not far off from being portrayed as a CreepyChild who lost his father in the September 11 attacks, [[TooSoon which was a recent event during the book's publication]], and has a B-plot of the life of his grandparents at UsefulNotes/NaziGermany. Gee, what's not to love here?
to:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: A story about an [[AmbiguousDisorder ambiguously autistic]] child that is not far off from being portrayed as a CreepyChild who lost his father in the September 11 attacks, [[TooSoon which was a recent event during the book's publication]], publication, and has a B-plot of the life of his grandparents at UsefulNotes/NaziGermany. Gee, what's not to love here?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* OvershadowedByControversy: Critics were divided on the film version and it was not a box office success, but regardless the film was still nominated for Best Picture at the Academy Awards, with questions about studio politics arising quickly thereafter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: A story about an autistic child that is not far off from being portrayed as a CreepyChild who lost his father in the September 11 attacks, [[TooSoon which was a recent event during the book's publication]], and has a B-plot of the life of his grandparents at UsefulNotes/NaziGermany. Gee, what's not to love here?
to:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: A story about an autistic [[AmbiguousDisorder ambiguously autistic]] child that is not far off from being portrayed as a CreepyChild who lost his father in the September 11 attacks, [[TooSoon which was a recent event during the book's publication]], and has a B-plot of the life of his grandparents at UsefulNotes/NaziGermany. Gee, what's not to love here?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: A story about an autistic child that is not far off from being portrayed as a CreepyChild who lost his father in the September 11 attacks, [[TooSoon which was a recent event during the book's publication]], and has a B-plot of the life of his grandparents at UsefulNotes/NaziGermany. Gee, what's not to love here?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not YMMV trope(s).
Deleted line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) :
* OscarBait: A DoubleSubversion. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Creator/MaxVonSydow's nomination was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution whose Oscar was sorely overdue, and he might have won had he not been up against the similarly overdue Christopher Plummer.
* TooSoon: The most common complaint from critics. The harsher ones say that the book was written specifically to cash in on an American tragedy, the nicer ones simply say that Americans have not yet had time to fully process 9/11 and that Foer is preening by offering contrived insights dressed up in flowery language. A common complaint is that the story didn't ''need'' to be about 9/11, the father could have died in a car wreck or a fire or a fishing accident and the story wouldn't have lost anything significant other than marketable iconography.
* TooSoon: The most common complaint from critics. The harsher ones say that the book was written specifically to cash in on an American tragedy, the nicer ones simply say that Americans have not yet had time to fully process 9/11 and that Foer is preening by offering contrived insights dressed up in flowery language. A common complaint is that the story didn't ''need'' to be about 9/11, the father could have died in a car wreck or a fire or a fishing accident and the story wouldn't have lost anything significant other than marketable iconography.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* OscarBait: A DoubleSubversion. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Creator/MaxVonSydow's nomination was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution, and he might have won had he not been up against the similarly overdue Christopher Plummer.
to:
* OscarBait: A DoubleSubversion. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Creator/MaxVonSydow's nomination was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution, institution whose Oscar was sorely overdue, and he might have won had he not been up against the similarly overdue Christopher Plummer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* OscarBait: A DoubleSubversion. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Creator/MaxVonSydow's win was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution and his Oscar was 70-years overdue.
to:
* OscarBait: A DoubleSubversion. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Creator/MaxVonSydow's win nomination was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution institution, and his Oscar was 70-years overdue.he might have won had he not been up against the similarly overdue Christopher Plummer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* OscarBait: A DoubleSubversion. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Max von Sydow's win was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution and his Oscar was 70-years overdue.
to:
* OscarBait: A DoubleSubversion. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Max von Sydow's Creator/MaxVonSydow's win was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution and his Oscar was 70-years overdue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* OscarBait: A DoubleSubversion. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Max von Sydow's win was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution and only got 1 nomination for his entire 70-year career.
to:
* OscarBait: A DoubleSubversion. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Max von Sydow's win was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution and only got 1 nomination for his entire 70-year career.Oscar was 70-years overdue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* TooSoon: The most common complaint from critics. The harsher ones say that the book was written specifically to cash in on an American tragedy, the nicer ones simply say that Americans have not yet had time to fully process 9/11 and that Foer is preening by offering contrived insights dressed up in flowery language.
to:
* TooSoon: The most common complaint from critics. The harsher ones say that the book was written specifically to cash in on an American tragedy, the nicer ones simply say that Americans have not yet had time to fully process 9/11 and that Foer is preening by offering contrived insights dressed up in flowery language. A common complaint is that the story didn't ''need'' to be about 9/11, the father could have died in a car wreck or a fire or a fishing accident and the story wouldn't have lost anything significant other than marketable iconography.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,4 (click to see context) from:
* JerkassWoobie: Oskar
* OscarBait: Probably ''the'' most shameless example in recent memory. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Main reason for this is that the story doesn't entirely ''need'' to be about 9/11, the father could just as easily have died in a fire or a car wreck with very little change to the overall story. But it's important, right? Cos it's about 9/11? Remember that? Wasn't that very sad and important? This is a very sad and important movie.
** Max von Sydow's win was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution and only got 1 nomination for his entire 70-year career.
* TheScrappy: Dear ''GOD'', Oskar. What a little shit.
* OscarBait: Probably ''the'' most shameless example in recent memory. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Main reason for this is that the story doesn't entirely ''need'' to be about 9/11, the father could just as easily have died in a fire or a car wreck with very little change to the overall story. But it's important, right? Cos it's about 9/11? Remember that? Wasn't that very sad and important? This is a very sad and important movie.
** Max von Sydow's win was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution and only got 1 nomination for his entire 70-year career.
* TheScrappy: Dear ''GOD'', Oskar. What a little shit.
to:
* JerkassWoobie: Oskar
Oskar.
* OscarBait:Probably ''the'' most shameless example in recent memory.A DoubleSubversion. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Main reason for this is that the story doesn't entirely ''need'' to be about 9/11, the father could just as easily have died in a fire or a car wreck with very little change to the overall story. But it's important, right? Cos it's about 9/11? Remember that? Wasn't that very sad and important? This is a very sad and important movie.
**Max von Sydow's win was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution and only got 1 nomination for his entire 70-year career.
* TheScrappy: Dear ''GOD'', Oskar. What a little shit.career.
* OscarBait:
**
* TheScrappy: Dear ''GOD'', Oskar. What a little shit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TheScrappy: Dear ''GOD'', Oskar. What a little shit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* TooSoon: The most common complaint from critics. The harsher ones say that the book was written specifically to cash in on an American tragedy, the nicer ones simply say that Americans have not yet had time to fully process 9/11 and that Foer is preening by offering contrived insights dressed up in flowery language.
to:
* TooSoon: The most common complaint from critics. The harsher ones say that the book was written specifically to cash in on an American tragedy, the nicer ones simply say that Americans have not yet had time to fully process 9/11 and that Foer is preening by offering contrived insights dressed up in flowery language.language.
* UncannyValley: The [[http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.impawards.com/2011/posters/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.impawards.com/2011/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close.html&h=755&w=510&sz=133&tbnid=pEQXL6iAIc47JM:&tbnh=98&tbnw=66&zoom=1&usg=__FIkoFFwSayJPC9WzsqW4uS2zg28=&docid=yrOprq8M-x82DM&sa=X&ei=Jq6wUPY3rumJAtHFgZgP&ved=0CDMQ9QEwAA&dur=1328 film adaptation's poster]] was accused of this, probably because the images of the kid's face and hands seem to have come from separate shots.
* UncannyValley: The [[http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.impawards.com/2011/posters/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.impawards.com/2011/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close.html&h=755&w=510&sz=133&tbnid=pEQXL6iAIc47JM:&tbnh=98&tbnw=66&zoom=1&usg=__FIkoFFwSayJPC9WzsqW4uS2zg28=&docid=yrOprq8M-x82DM&sa=X&ei=Jq6wUPY3rumJAtHFgZgP&ved=0CDMQ9QEwAA&dur=1328 film adaptation's poster]] was accused of this, probably because the images of the kid's face and hands seem to have come from separate shots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Max von Sydow's win was almost entirely chalked up to the fact he was a Hollywood institution and only got 1 nomination for his entire 70-year career.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* LesYay: Grandma and Anna kissed each other back when they were children in Dresden. Problem is, it wasn't exactly how you would normally kiss your sister...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* OscarBait: Probably ''the'' most shameless example in recent memory. Despite being critically drubbed upon release, it still somehow got a Best Picture nomination, almost purely for its subject material. Main reason for this is that the story doesn't entirely ''need'' to be about 9/11, the father could just as easily have died in a fire or a car wreck with very little change to the overall story. But it's important, right? Cos it's about 9/11? Remember that? Wasn't that very sad and important? This is a very sad and important movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* JerkassWoobie: Oskar
* LesYay: Grandma and Anna kissed each other back when they were children in Dresden. Problem is, it wasn't exactly how you would normally kiss your sister...
* LesYay: Grandma and Anna kissed each other back when they were children in Dresden. Problem is, it wasn't exactly how you would normally kiss your sister...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
TooSoon: The most common complaint from critics. The harsher ones say that the book was written specifically to cash in on an American tragedy, the nicer ones simply say that Americans have not yet had time to fully process 9/11 and that Foer is preening by offering contrived insights dressed up in flowery language.
to:
* TooSoon: The most common complaint from critics. The harsher ones say that the book was written specifically to cash in on an American tragedy, the nicer ones simply say that Americans have not yet had time to fully process 9/11 and that Foer is preening by offering contrived insights dressed up in flowery language.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
TooSoon: The most common complaint from critics. The harsher critics say that the book was written specifically to cash in on an American tragedy, the nicer ones simply say that Americans have not yet had time to fully process 9/11 and that Foer is preening by offering contrived insights dressed up in flowery language.
to:
TooSoon: The most common complaint from critics. The harsher critics ones say that the book was written specifically to cash in on an American tragedy, the nicer ones simply say that Americans have not yet had time to fully process 9/11 and that Foer is preening by offering contrived insights dressed up in flowery language.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
TooSoon: The most common complaint from critics. The harsher critics say that the book was written specifically to cash in on an American tragedy, the nicer ones simply say that Americans have not yet had time to fully process 9/11 and that Foer is preening by offering contrived insights dressed up in flowery language.