History YMMV / DeadPoetsSociety

16th Jun '16 8:32:25 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* {{Narm}}: The BigNo is ruined by the slow motion and [[spoiler:Neil's father being played by Kurtwood Smith from ''That70sShow'']]. You can ''almost'' hear him screaming "[[spoiler:NEIL, YOU DUMBASS!!!]]"

to:

* {{Narm}}: The BigNo is ruined by the slow motion and [[spoiler:Neil's father being played by Kurtwood Smith from ''That70sShow'']].''Series/That70sShow'']]. You can ''almost'' hear him screaming "[[spoiler:NEIL, YOU DUMBASS!!!]]"
9th Jun '16 11:25:15 PM ScotieRw
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Neil was an idiot or, leastways, psychologically disturbed. Becuase he couldn't [[spoiler:(temporarily) pursue his suddenly concieved dream to be an actor]] he [[spoiler:kills himself]]. Really, he, or mental illness, is to be blamed rather than his father for [[spoiler:his suicide]]. Alternately, many people see Neil's interest in acting as a metaphor for homosexuality, and that both Neil and his father knew what Neil ''really'' meant by "acting" but avoided the actual subject.
16th May '16 9:31:48 AM kyeo
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Neil was an idiot or, leastways, psychologically disturbed. Becuase he couldn't [[spoiler:(temporarily) pursue his suddenly concieved dream to be an actor]] he [[spoiler:kills himself]]. Really, he, or mental illness, is to be blamed rather than his father for [[spoiler:his suicide]].

to:

** Neil was an idiot or, leastways, psychologically disturbed. Becuase he couldn't [[spoiler:(temporarily) pursue his suddenly concieved dream to be an actor]] he [[spoiler:kills himself]]. Really, he, or mental illness, is to be blamed rather than his father for [[spoiler:his suicide]]. Alternately, many people see Neil's interest in acting as a metaphor for homosexuality, and that both Neil and his father knew what Neil ''really'' meant by "acting" but avoided the actual subject.
13th May '16 5:57:17 PM SvartiKotturinn
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Neil was an idiot or, leastways, psychologically disturbed. Becuase he couldn't (temporarily) pursue his suddenly concieved dream to be an actor he kills himself. Really, he, or mental illness, is to be blamed rather than his father for his suicide.

to:

** Neil was an idiot or, leastways, psychologically disturbed. Becuase he couldn't (temporarily) [[spoiler:(temporarily) pursue his suddenly concieved dream to be an actor actor]] he kills himself. [[spoiler:kills himself]]. Really, he, or mental illness, is to be blamed rather than his father for his suicide.[[spoiler:his suicide]].
26th Mar '16 6:26:57 PM kquinn0830
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Keating ''was'' an irresponsible teacher, encouraging the students to break the school rules when in so doing it could get them in trouble but would be unlikely to rebound on him.
** It could be argued that the value of broadening the students' perspective and encouraging them to enter adult life with a different attitude than that endorsed by the school was in the long run worth the short-term risk of being disciplined by the school. Plus Keating calls out Charlie when he goes too far and pulls a prank.
** Keating actually had very little tolerance for ideas that didn't conform to his free thinking ideology. Face it, telling his students to pull a page out of a textbook because he didn't like the author's message - censorship. Note that Keating didn't set up his own alternative theory, he just had his students destroy the page he didn't like.
** He did first have the students read the text and gave a brief, impassioned explanation for why he disapproved of it. It was more an act of rebellion than true censorship and the students could always make up their own minds about it.
*** While this is a good point, consider that the school's likely going to continue to using the books ''sans'' the introduction. It still has the hair of censorship. If Keating was being true to the values he was promoting, he would have given his passionate views on poetry, yet, but not have the "mathematical" analysis he so despised be chucked out.

to:

** Was Keating ''was'' an irresponsible teacher, encouraging the students to break the school rules when in so doing it could get them in trouble but would be unlikely to rebound on him.
** It could be argued that the value of broadening the students' perspective and encouraging them to enter adult life with a different attitude than that endorsed by the school was in the long run worth the short-term risk of being disciplined by the school. Plus Keating calls out Charlie when he goes too far and pulls a prank.
** Keating actually had very little tolerance
teacher for ideas that didn't conform to his free thinking ideology. Face it, telling his students to pull a page out of a textbook because he didn't like the author's message - censorship. Note that Keating didn't set up his own alternative theory, he just had his students destroy the page he didn't like.
** He did first have the students read the text and gave a brief, impassioned explanation for why he disapproved of it. It was more an act of rebellion than true censorship and the students could always make up their own minds about it.
*** While this is a good point, consider that
going against the school's likely going to continue to using the books ''sans'' the introduction. It still has the hair of censorship. If Keating was being true to the values he and rules despite the consequences, or was promoting, he would have given his passionate views on poetry, yet, but not have doing the "mathematical" analysis he so despised be chucked out. students a favor by trying to open their minds and broaden their perspectives?


Added DiffLines:

* BrokenBase: Some viewers feel Keating ''was'' an irresponsible teacher, encouraging the students to break the school rules when in so doing it could get them in trouble but would be unlikely to rebound on him and he tried to censor ideas that he didn't agree with ie ripping out the book introduction. Others feel that the value of broadening the students' perspective and encouraging them to enter adult life with a different attitude than that endorsed by the school was in the long run worth the short-term risk of being disciplined by the school. Plus Keating calls out Charlie when he goes too far and pulls a prank. Plus, he did first have the students read the text and gave a brief, impassioned explanation for why he disapproved of it. It was more an act of rebellion than true censorship and the students could always make up their own minds about it.
4th Feb '16 2:57:03 PM johnsmithxxi
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Keating ''was'' an irresponsible teacher, encouraging the students to break the school rules when in so doing it could get them in trouble but would be unlikely to rebound on him.
** It could be argued that the value of broadening the students' perspective and encouraging them to enter adult life with a different attitude than that endorsed by the school was in the long run worth the short-term risk of being disciplined by the school. Plus Keating calls out Charlie when he goes too far and pulls a prank.
** Keating actually had very little tolerance for ideas that didn't conform to his free thinking ideology. Face it, telling his students to pull a page out of a textbook because he didn't like the author's message - censorship. Note that Keating didn't set up his own alternative theory, he just had his students destroy the page he didn't like.
** He did first have the students read the text and gave a brief, impassioned explanation for why he disapproved of it. It was more an act of rebellion than true censorship and the students could always make up their own minds about it.
*** While this is a good point, consider that the school's likely going to continue to using the books ''sans'' the introduction. It still has the hair of censorship. If Keating was being true to the values he was promoting, he would have given his passionate views on poetry, yet, but not have the "mathematical" analysis he so despised be chucked out.
** Neil was an idiot or, leastways, psychologically disturbed. Becuase he couldn't (temporarily) pursue his suddenly concieved dream to be an actor he kills himself. Really, he, or mental illness, is to be blamed rather than his father for his suicide.
* DesignatedVillain: Principal Nolan has some of this, the movie setting him up as the uber-conformist, stuffy-conservative [[StopHavingFunGuys "Stop Having Fun" Guy]] opposite Mr. Keating's free-spirited CoolTeacher. While he ''is'' a jerk from time to time, most of the time he's just doing his job as principal of the school; the rest of the time, he's espousing beliefs or values that clash with the message of "Carpe Diem", which is hardly ''his'' fault. About the worst thing he does is fire Mr. Keating following the scandal caused by [[spoiler:Neil killing himself]] -- and even then, it's an act of damage control, not motivated by spite or cruelty.
** Nolan clearly believes that the authoritarian structure of the school should be maintained, considers the ridiculous essay about drawing graphs to analyze poetry that Keating condemned to be "excellent", and disciplines Charlie for his silly prank by ''paddling'' him. His portrayal as the bad guy seems quite justified.


Added DiffLines:

* JerkassHasAPoint: Keating's antics don't go over well with the school administration and teachers. He has at least two conversations about this during the course of the film. While the audience is set up to believe their adherence to tradition and conformity are a bad thing, both conversations drive the point home. "Free thinkers at seventeen? Teach them to learn and the rest will follow." A prep school education is designed to send the young men on to college, and trying to be an artist will only end in disappointment.
4th Feb '16 12:10:26 PM PriceCheck
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* DesignatedVillain: Principal Nolan has some of this, the movie setting him up as the uber-conformist, stuffy-conservative [[StopHavingFunGuys "Stop Having Fun" Guy]] opposite Mr. Keating's free-spirited CoolTeacher. While he ''is'' a jerk from time to time, most of the time he's just doing his job as principal of the school; the rest of the time, he's espousing beliefs or values that clash with the message of "Carpe Diem", which is hardly ''his'' fault. About the worst thing he does is fire Mr. Keating following the scandal caused by [[spoiler:Neil killing himself]] -- and even then, it's an act of damage control, not motivated by spite or cruelty.
** Nolan clearly believes that the authoritarian structure of the school should be maintained, considers the ridiculous essay about drawing graphs to analyze poetry that Keating condemned to be "excellent", and disciplines Charlie for his silly prank by ''paddling'' him. His portrayal as the bad guy seems quite justified.
26th Jan '16 9:34:27 PM DoctorCooper
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Keating ''was'' an irresponsible teacher, encouraging the students to break the school rules when in so doing it could get them in trouble but would be unlikely to rebound on him.
** It could be argued that the value of broadening the students' perspective and encouraging them to enter adult life with a different attitude than that endorsed by the school was in the long run worth the short-term risk of being disciplined by the school. Plus Keating calls out Charlie when he goes too far and pulls a prank.
** Keating actually had very little tolerance for ideas that didn't conform to his free thinking ideology. Face it, telling his students to pull a page out of a textbook because he didn't like the author's message - censorship. Note that Keating didn't set up his own alternative theory, he just had his students destroy the page he didn't like.
** He did first have the students read the text and gave a brief, impassioned explanation for why he disapproved of it. It was more an act of rebellion than true censorship and the students could always make up their own minds about it.
** Neil was an idiot or, leastways, psychologically disturbed. Becuase he couldn't (temporarily) pursue his suddenly concieved dream to be an actor he kills himself. Really, he, or mental illness, is to be blamed rather than his father for his suicide.
31st Dec '15 1:21:48 PM erracht
Is there an issue? Send a Message
31st Dec '15 1:21:30 PM erracht
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** It could be argued that the value of broadening the students' perspective and encouraging them to enter adult life with a different attitude than that endorsed by the school was in the long run worth the short-term risk of being disciplined by the school. Plus Keating calls out Charlie when he goes too far and pulls a prank.


Added DiffLines:

** He did first have the students read the text and gave a brief, impassioned explanation for why he disapproved of it. It was more an act of rebellion than true censorship and the students could always make up their own minds about it.


Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:

** Nolan clearly believes that the authoritarian structure of the school should be maintained, considers the ridiculous essay about drawing graphs to analyze poetry that Keating condemned to be "excellent", and disciplines Charlie for his silly prank by ''paddling'' him. His portrayal as the bad guy seems quite justified.
This list shows the last 10 events of 46. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=YMMV.DeadPoetsSociety