Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AudienceAlienatingEnding: If you beat the final boss the wrong way, you ''don't get an ending'', just a "FIN" card. If you beat it the right way... the ending you get has almost ''nothing'' to do with the rest of the game. There are MultipleEndings, but they're almost entirely jokes that don't really answer any of the myriad unanswered questions scattered throughout the plot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 41 (click to see context) from:
* ContestedSequel: If ''Cross'' didn't bear the name "''Chrono''", it would be regarded as a visually-stunning RPG with great music and fairly interesting plot. But ''CT'' is pretty much a SacredCow as far as [[EasternRPG JRPGs]] go, and ''Cross'' is extremely different in many regards, is ''vastly'' more confusing, and has controversial handling of what little ''Trigger'' content does return, so there are many people who outright hate it. It's generally seen as a good ''game'' in its own right, but whether it's a good ''sequel'' to ''Chrono Trigger'' is incredibly divisive.
to:
* ContestedSequel: If ''Cross'' didn't bear the name "''Chrono''", it would be regarded as a visually-stunning RPG with great music and fairly interesting plot. But ''CT'' is pretty much a SacredCow as far as [[EasternRPG JRPGs]] go, and ''Cross'' is extremely different in many regards, is ''vastly'' more confusing, and has controversial handling of what little ''Trigger'' content does return, so there are many people who outright hate it. It's generally seen as a good ''game'' in its own right, but whether it's a good ''sequel'' to ''Chrono Trigger'' is incredibly divisive. What certainly didn't help was that Kato has allegedly been quoted as saying the game is "not a sequel" to ''Chrono Trigger'', but "it takes the story where ''Trigger'' left off and continues", leading to a ''lot'' of confusion.
