*** Though I am not the first three-asterisk poster, I can provide an example. During the second of his "Retake Mass Effect" Game Overthinker episodes, he summarized the comments of his prior video as "You suck now Overthinker!" when a large majority of the comments were not even insults at Bob, but respectful disagreement or agreement and reasoned debate about the quality of the ending itself with fairly large posts. Bob made numerous insults at the people that supported "Retake Mass Effect", insinuating that most supporters were babies or other "snide insinuations" and "disingenuous assertations". The way he handled the topic was not reasonable and calm for somebody who thinks they hold the high-ground. It was especially bad when that very same responses clearly laid out that their negative response was to numerous factors, none of them being that the ending was sad, and his strawman's arguement was that, avoiding the other complaints that would require more thought to debate with than strawmen and insults. On a different note, he watched the endings online and determined their quality without the context of the rest of the franchise leading-up to that point.

to:

24th Nov '12 5:47:21 PM AltruisticPaladins

Send AltruisticPaladins a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:

to:

*** Can you direct me to those areas so I can see what your talking about, and maybe edit it?
*** Though I am not the first three-asterisk poster, I can provide an example. During the second of his "Retake Mass Effect" Game Overthinker episodes, he summarized the comments of his prior video as "You suck now Overthinker!" when a large majority of the comments were not even insults at Bob, but respectful disagreement or agreement and reasoned debate about the quality of the ending itself with fairly large posts. Bob made numerous insults at the people that supported "Retake Mass Effect", insinuating that most supporters were babies or other "snide insinuations" and "disingenuous assertations". The way he handled the topic was not reasonable and calm for somebody who thinks they hold the high-ground. It was especially bad when that very same responses clearly laid out that their negative response was to numerous factors, none of them being that the ending was sad, and his strawman's arguement was that, avoiding the other complaints that would require more thought to debate with than strawmen and insults. On a different note, he watched the endings online and determined their quality without the context of the rest of the franchise leading-up to that point.

9th Oct '12 9:26:34 AM Wildcard

Send Wildcard a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Asking a question.

Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:

to:

8th Oct '12 9:32:24 PM d715

Send d715 a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:

to:

28th Aug '12 7:25:08 AM Wildcard

Send Wildcard a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from: