Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Theatre / Rope

Go To

OR



* DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything: Brandon and Phillip's respective behavior during the party resembles the difference between extroverts and introverts. Brandon (in his own [[TheSociopath twisted]] way) fits in with the other guests during the story and comes out of the party feeling invigorated and satisfied. Phillip (granted, he's wrestling with his guilt) acts uncomfortable or awkward during the entire social event while surrounded by people or conversing with them, and comes out of the experience emotionally drained.

Added: 144

Changed: 195

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/112rope_2827.jpg]]

to:

%%
%% Image selected per Image Pickin thread: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=17100372110.73792700
%% Please don't change or remove without starting a new thread.
%%
[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/112rope_2827.jpg]]
org/pmwiki/pub/images/ropemovie2.png]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BackBlocking: Hitchcock often ends a shot by panning to a character's back blocking the entire screen, then begins the next shot by panning away or when they move aside.

to:

* BackBlocking: Hitchcock often ends a shot by panning to a character's back blocking the entire screen, then begins the next shot by panning away or when they move aside. aside to give the illusion of a single, unbroken take.

Added: 490

Changed: 12

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OriginalPositionFallacy: [[spoiler: Rupert previously had no qualms about simply ''saying'' everyone (or at least the privileged few) should have the right to kill others. If anything, he only said it because he imagined it happening to complete strangers. But when his student David is the victim of Brandon and Phillip's twisted game, it hits too close to home for Rupert, shaking his faith in his rhetoric. It's even by his own admission that he regrets ever supporting his own idea.]]



** Mrs. Wilson ends up mixing up Rupert and David's hats, giving him the final piece of proof he needs to fully realize what Brandon and Phillip has done.

to:

** Mrs. Wilson ends up mixing up Rupert and David's hats, giving him the final piece of proof he needs to fully realize suspect what Brandon and Phillip has done.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* INeedAFreakingDrink: Several characters, most notably Phillip after the party guests have left.

to:

* INeedAFreakingDrink: Several characters, most notably Phillip after the party guests have left. [[spoiler: Brandon’s final act before the credits roll is to wordlessly pour himself one last drink as he, Phillip and Rupert await the police’s arrival.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* NeverMyFault: Rupert explicitly tells his students that the world would be better if the smartest people were allowed to murder their "inferiors" from time to time. [[spoiler:Yet, when he finds out Brandon actually did it, he accuses Brandon of "twisting his words" and insists that he never meant to endorse murder.]]

Changed: 507

Removed: 510

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheOner: Hitchcock wanted to make the film one long, continuous shot. Sadly, this wasn't feasible with the technology of the time: film would run out after about ten minutes. But he tried to get as close to this as he could. The finished film consists of ten long shots, ranging from four to ten minutes in length, joined together mostly by
by {{Body Wipe}}s (the camera zooms in on some person or something, and zooms out when it cuts). But because film reels need to be changed every twenty minutes in cinema screenings, Hitchcock still had to put four "hard cuts" in the film. But, given that the average film has hundreds of hard cuts, that's still impressive. But, to accomplish all of that, Hitchcock needed to limit ''Rope'''s running time to a mere 1 hour and 20 minutes, far and away his shortest film after he relocated to Hollywood in 1940.

to:

* TheOner: Hitchcock wanted to make the film one long, continuous shot. Sadly, this wasn't feasible with the technology of the time: film would run out after about ten minutes. But he tried to get as close to this as he could. The finished film consists of ten long shots, ranging from four to ten minutes in length, joined together mostly by
by {{Body Wipe}}s (the camera zooms in on some person or something, and zooms out when it cuts). But because film reels need to be changed every twenty minutes in cinema screenings, Hitchcock still had to put four "hard cuts" in the film. But, given that the average film has hundreds of hard cuts, that's still impressive. But, to accomplish all of that, Hitchcock needed to limit ''Rope'''s running time to a mere 1 hour and 20 minutes, far and away his shortest film after he relocated to Hollywood in 1940.

Added: 510

Changed: 641

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheOner: Hitchcock wanted to make the film one long, continuous shot. Sadly, this wasn't feasible with the technology of the time: film would run out after about ten minutes. Still, he got as close to it as he could, by making the movie a handful of ten-minute-long single shots, joined together by {{Body Wipe}}s (the camera zooms in on some person or something, and zooms out when it cuts). But because film reels need to be changed every twenty minutes in cinema screenings, Hitchcock still had to put five "hard cuts" in the film. But, given that the average film has hundreds of hard cuts, that's still impressive. But, to accomplish all of that, Hitchcock needed to limit ''Rope'''s running time to a mere 1 hour and 21 minutes, far and away his shortest film after he relocated to Hollywood in 1940.

to:

* TheOner: Hitchcock wanted to make the film one long, continuous shot. Sadly, this wasn't feasible with the technology of the time: film would run out after about ten minutes. Still, But he got tried to get as close to it this as he could, by making the movie a handful could. The finished film consists of ten-minute-long single ten long shots, ranging from four to ten minutes in length, joined together mostly by
by {{Body Wipe}}s (the camera zooms in on some person or something, and zooms out when it cuts). But because film reels need to be changed every twenty minutes in cinema screenings, Hitchcock still had to put five four "hard cuts" in the film. But, given that the average film has hundreds of hard cuts, that's still impressive. But, to accomplish all of that, Hitchcock needed to limit ''Rope'''s running time to a mere 1 hour and 21 20 minutes, far and away his shortest film after he relocated to Hollywood in 1940.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheOner: Hitchcock wanted to make the film one long, continuous shot. Sadly, this wasn't feasible with the technology of the time: film would run out after about ten minutes. So Hitchcock resorted to using {{Body Wipe}}s all over the place, meaning that the camera would zoom in on some person or something, and zoom out when it cuts. Sadly, even this wasn't enough; there are still five "hard cuts" in the film (because film reels in the cinema would ''also'' run out after twenty minutes and need to be changed over, so some cuts are straightforward and normal), but that's pretty impressive when most movies have hundreds of hard cuts.

to:

* TheOner: Hitchcock wanted to make the film one long, continuous shot. Sadly, this wasn't feasible with the technology of the time: film would run out after about ten minutes. So Hitchcock resorted Still, he got as close to using it as he could, by making the movie a handful of ten-minute-long single shots, joined together by {{Body Wipe}}s all over the place, meaning that the (the camera would zoom zooms in on some person or something, and zoom zooms out when it cuts. Sadly, even this wasn't enough; there are cuts). But because film reels need to be changed every twenty minutes in cinema screenings, Hitchcock still had to put five "hard cuts" in the film. But, given that the average film (because film reels in the cinema would ''also'' run out after twenty minutes and need to be changed over, so some cuts are straightforward and normal), but that's pretty impressive when most movies have has hundreds of hard cuts.cuts, that's still impressive. But, to accomplish all of that, Hitchcock needed to limit ''Rope'''s running time to a mere 1 hour and 21 minutes, far and away his shortest film after he relocated to Hollywood in 1940.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RippedFromTheHeadlines: The stage play from which the movie was adapted was inspired by the infamous Leopold and Loeb murder case from 1924. Another fictionalized version would come about a decade later with Richard Fleischer's ''Film/{{Compulsion}}''.

to:

* RippedFromTheHeadlines: The stage play from which the movie was adapted was inspired by the infamous Leopold and Loeb murder case from 1924. Another fictionalized version would come about a decade later with Richard Fleischer's ''Film/{{Compulsion}}''.''Film/{{Compulsion|1959}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RippedFromTheHeadlines: The stage play from which the movie was adapted was inspired by the infamous Leopold and Loeb murder case from 1924. Another fictionalized version would come about a decade later with Richard Fleischer's ''Compulsion''.

to:

* RippedFromTheHeadlines: The stage play from which the movie was adapted was inspired by the infamous Leopold and Loeb murder case from 1924. Another fictionalized version would come about a decade later with Richard Fleischer's ''Compulsion''.''Film/{{Compulsion}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything: Brandon and Phillip's respective behavior during the party resembles the difference between extroverts and introverts. Brandon (in his own [[TheSociopath twisted]] way) fits in with the other guests during the story and comes out of the party feeling invigorated and satisfied. Phillipe (granted he's wrestling with his guilt) acts uncomfortable or awkward during the entire social event while surrounded by people or conversing with them, and comes out of the experience emotionally drained.

to:

* DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything: Brandon and Phillip's respective behavior during the party resembles the difference between extroverts and introverts. Brandon (in his own [[TheSociopath twisted]] way) fits in with the other guests during the story and comes out of the party feeling invigorated and satisfied. Phillipe (granted Phillip (granted, he's wrestling with his guilt) acts uncomfortable or awkward during the entire social event while surrounded by people or conversing with them, and comes out of the experience emotionally drained.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DesecratingTheDead: Played with. Brandon decides to have the party's dinner served on the very chest where David's body is hidden. The cruelty of it is that the morbid meal is served to David's father, aunt, friend, and girlfriend, all of whom don't suspect that he is right under their noses.

to:

* DesecratingTheDead: Played with. Brandon decides to have the party's dinner served on the very chest where David's body is hidden. The cruelty of it is that the morbid meal is served to David's father, aunt, friend, and girlfriend, all none of whom don't suspect that he is right under their noses.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationPersonalityChange: Most of the supporting characters. Rupert gets a significant one too, from a young, effete, and bitchy UsefulNotes/WorldWarI veteran and poet to a more middle-aged, staid, conventional Jimmy Stewart type. The film's Rupert is also a more explicit mentor and authority figure to Brandon and Phillip, being their former teacher, while the play's version appears to be an older childhood friend who underestimated his influence.

to:

* AdaptationPersonalityChange: Most of the supporting characters. Rupert gets a significant one too, also, from a young, effete, and bitchy UsefulNotes/WorldWarI veteran and poet to a more middle-aged, staid, conventional Jimmy Stewart type. The film's Rupert is also a more of an explicit mentor and authority figure to Brandon and Phillip, being their former teacher, while the play's version appears to be an older childhood friend who underestimated his influence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AmicableExes: Kenneth and Janet develop into this. Brandon's attempt to play matchmaker without David around causes them to not only realize he is being an asshole to them, but also lets them come to terms to the end of said relation, Kenneth apologizing for dumping Janet, while she confesses to truly be in love with David.

to:

* AmicableExes: Kenneth and Janet develop into this. Brandon's attempt attempts to play matchmaker without David around causes them to not only realize he is being an asshole to them, but also lets them come to terms to with the end of said relation, their engagement, as Kenneth apologizing apologizes for dumping Janet, while Janet and she confesses to truly be being in love with David.



* DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything: Brandon and Phillipe's respective behavior during the party resembles the difference between extroverts and introverts. Brandon (in his own [[TheSociopath twisted]] way) fits in with the other guests during the story and comes out of the party feeling invigorated and satisfied. Phillipe (granted he's wrestling with his guilt) acts uncomfortable or awkward during the entire social event while surrounded by people or conversing with them, and comes out of the experience emotionally drained.

to:

* DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything: Brandon and Phillipe's Phillip's respective behavior during the party resembles the difference between extroverts and introverts. Brandon (in his own [[TheSociopath twisted]] way) fits in with the other guests during the story and comes out of the party feeling invigorated and satisfied. Phillipe (granted he's wrestling with his guilt) acts uncomfortable or awkward during the entire social event while surrounded by people or conversing with them, and comes out of the experience emotionally drained.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationPersonalityChange: Much of the supporting cast. Rupert gets a significant one too, from young, effete, and bitchy World War One veteran and poet to an older, more conventional Jimmy Stewart type. Film Rupert is also a more explicit mentor and authority figure to Brandon and Phillip, being their former teacher, while the play's version appears to be an older childhood friend who underestimated his influence.

to:

* AdaptationPersonalityChange: Much Most of the supporting cast. characters. Rupert gets a significant one too, from a young, effete, and bitchy World War One UsefulNotes/WorldWarI veteran and poet to an older, a more middle-aged, staid, conventional Jimmy Stewart type. Film The film's Rupert is also a more explicit mentor and authority figure to Brandon and Phillip, being their former teacher, while the play's version appears to be an older childhood friend who underestimated his influence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationalSexuality: Brandon and Philip being gay was a lot clearer in the original play, but is reduced to subtext in the film (mostly due to the censorship at the time), and Brandon is implied to be bisexual. Hitchcock claimed Rupert was written as being gay, too, and had even had an affair with Brandon.

to:

* AdaptationalSexuality: Brandon and Philip being gay was a lot clearer in the original play, but is reduced to subtext in the film (mostly due to the [[UsefulNotes/TheHaysCode Hays Code]] censorship at of the time), and Brandon is implied to be bisexual. Hitchcock claimed Rupert was written as being gay, too, and had even had an affair with Brandon.

Top