Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / Mst3kMantra

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


See also ThisIsAWorkOfFiction, esp. as used in-universe in ''[[LightNovel/HaruhiSuzumiya The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya]]'', to prevent Haruhi from making everything in the SOS film into reality by thinking about it too much.

to:

See also ThisIsAWorkOfFiction, esp. as used in-universe in ''[[LightNovel/HaruhiSuzumiya ''[[Literature/HaruhiSuzumiya The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya]]'', to prevent Haruhi from making everything in the SOS film into reality by thinking about it too much.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


Like BellisariosMaxim, it is employed in fan communities to ridicule or short-circuit all manner of [[FanWank bizarre fan theories]], factual inaccuracy entries, and StockParodyJokes.

to:

Like BellisariosMaxim, it is employed in fan communities to ridicule or short-circuit all manner of [[FanWank bizarre fan theories]], factual inaccuracy entries, theories]] and StockParodyJokes.
factually inaccuracate entries.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Take three deep breaths and recite when tempted to make some Administrivia/JustifyingEdit. Many of our very own tropes (including and especially our ArtisticLicense archipelago) tend to get very nitpicky about following or failing to follow core sciences so even we could do with repeating it to ourselves regarding whole tropes.

to:

Take three deep breaths and recite when tempted to make some Administrivia/JustifyingEdit. Many of our very own tropes (including and especially our ArtisticLicense archipelago) tend to get very nitpicky about following or failing to follow core sciences sciences, so even we could do with repeating it to ourselves regarding whole tropes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!Please do not add examples to work pages, this is merely [[Administrivia/DefinitionOnlyPages defines the term]].

to:

!Please do not add examples to work pages, this is page merely [[Administrivia/DefinitionOnlyPages defines the term]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Wiki/ namespace cleaning.


The closest thing this trope has to TruthInTelevision is the concept of ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_Reform_and_the_Psychology_of_Totalism#Thought-terminating_clich.C3.A9 thought-terminating cliché]]''; as Wiki/TheOtherWiki puts it, "a commonly used phrase, sometimes passing as folk wisdom [...] its application as a means of dismissing dissent or justifying fallacious logic is what makes it thought-terminating."

to:

The closest thing this trope has to TruthInTelevision is the concept of ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_Reform_and_the_Psychology_of_Totalism#Thought-terminating_clich.C3.A9 thought-terminating cliché]]''; as Wiki/TheOtherWiki Website/TheOtherWiki puts it, "a commonly used phrase, sometimes passing as folk wisdom [...] its application as a means of dismissing dissent or justifying fallacious logic is what makes it thought-terminating."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No version of the intro actually name drops the character's name in that passage, so including it in the "Full line" is incorrect


->''"If you're wondering how he [Joel/Mike/Jonah] eats and breathes\\

to:

->''"If you're wondering how he [Joel/Mike/Jonah] eats and breathes\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Both''': Do-ho-ho-ho-hoh!

to:

'''Both''': '''[[JustForFun/StatlerAndWaldorf Both]]''': Do-ho-ho-ho-hoh!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Repair Shop thread closed.


[[WMG:[[center:[[AC:This trope is [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1618242873019261300&page=1#1 under discussion]] in the Administrivia/TropeRepairShop.]]]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hotfix


''"[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ugebzq3juE It's just a show; I should just relax.]]"''

to:

''"[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ugebzq3juE It's just a show; I should really just relax.]]"''



I should just relax.'"''

to:

I should really just relax.'"''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''"[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ugebzq3juE It's just a show; I should really just relax.]]"''

Line from the [[ThemeTune theme song]] of ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000'', which encourages the viewer not to worry about details that are irrelevant to the enjoyment of the program. Sometimes referred to as ''Hodgson's Law'', after Creator/JoelHodgson, creator and original lead actor of ''[=MST3K=]''.

to:

''"[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ugebzq3juE It's just a show; I should really just relax.]]"''

Line A line from the [[ThemeTune theme song]] of ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000'', which encourages the viewer not to worry about details that are irrelevant to the enjoyment of the program. Sometimes referred to as ''Hodgson's Law'', after Creator/JoelHodgson, creator and original lead actor of ''[=MST3K=]''.



I should really just relax.'"''

to:

I should really just relax.'"''



Take three deep breaths and recite when tempted to make a Administrivia/JustifyingEdit. Many of our very own tropes (including and especially our ArtisticLicense archipelago) have a tendency to get very nitpicky about following or failing to follow core sciences so even we could do with repeating it to ourselves regarding whole tropes.

to:

Take three deep breaths and recite when tempted to make a some Administrivia/JustifyingEdit. Many of our very own tropes (including and especially our ArtisticLicense archipelago) have a tendency tend to get very nitpicky about following or failing to follow core sciences so even we could do with repeating it to ourselves regarding whole tropes.



When we consider that the very point of ''[=MST3K=]'' was itself to mock and ridicule movies for breaches of logic and defective storytelling, we encounter a sort of ''[=MST3K=]'' Dilemma: a glib assessment of the situation would have it that the show was hypocritical with its insistence that the viewers subject it to less scrutiny than they themselves brought to bear against countless films, but a more careful consideration should lead us to discern that different subjects should be held to different critical criteria. Indeed, [[ExcusePlot what passed for plot]] in ''[=MST3K=]'' was little more than a goofy premise to facilitate the mockery of bad movies, and labelling this as "just a show" doesn't make it any less good. [[note]]Amusingly enough, the show did later provide an explanation for how the hosts eat and breathe, making reference to the equipment that creates the air, huge boxes of food, the Umbilicus (a space-elevator style hookup via which the Mads deliver things physically to the satellite) and a farm somewhere on the ship, which Mike never noticed.[[/note]]

One should be careful that they do not go too far and use this to justify saying that TheComplainerIsAlwaysWrong. Yes, there's no point in getting excessively worked up and nitpicky about something that, at the end of the day, is just a work of fiction. But using it as a way of brushing off any and all forms of criticism is an equally dangerous attitude to have, and in creators can be a possible sign of a SmallNameBigEgo at work utilizing DearNegativeReader. Conversely, anybody who hopes to promote a movie and insists it's "just a movie" and critics should "just relax" while also expecting they take seriously any [[AnAesop Aesop]], CentralTheme, SpeculativeFiction, {{Spectacle}}, or just anything beyond superficial amusement from it is insulting the intelligence of the audience. This is not about critical appraisal, but what is necessary to tell a story. When criticism targets those things that were unexplained because it is irrelevant to the story structure and motivations, ''then'' you can invoke BellisariosMaxim.

This concept is OlderThanSteam, [[JustForFun/TheZerothLawOfTropeExamples also being used in]] Creator/WilliamShakespeare's ''Theatre/AMidsummerNightsDream'': Puck's final speech, which starts "If we shadows have offended/Think but this and all is mended..." can be condensed into "'Tis but a play/I'faith, I should really just relax." This was actually a kind of disclaimer, to mollify people in power who may have construed the subject matter of that and other plays of his as blasphemous and obscene. It still applies to this trope, though.

to:

When we consider that the very point of ''[=MST3K=]'' was itself to mock and ridicule movies for breaches of logic and defective storytelling, we encounter a sort of ''[=MST3K=]'' Dilemma: a glib assessment of the situation would have it that the show was hypocritical with its insistence that the viewers subject it to less scrutiny than they themselves brought to bear against countless films, but a more careful consideration should lead us to discern that different subjects should be held to different critical criteria. Indeed, [[ExcusePlot what passed for plot]] in ''[=MST3K=]'' was little more than a goofy premise to facilitate the mockery of bad movies, and labelling labeling this as "just a show" doesn't make it any less good. [[note]]Amusingly enough, the show did later provide an explanation for explain how the hosts eat and breathe, making reference to the equipment that creates the air, huge boxes of food, the Umbilicus (a space-elevator style hookup via which the Mads deliver things physically to the satellite) and a farm somewhere on the ship, which Mike never noticed.[[/note]]

One should be careful that they do not go too far and use this to justify saying that TheComplainerIsAlwaysWrong. Yes, there's no point in getting excessively worked up and nitpicky about something that, at the end of the day, is just a work of fiction. But using it as a way of brushing off any and all forms of criticism is an equally dangerous attitude to have, and in creators can be a possible sign of a SmallNameBigEgo at work utilizing DearNegativeReader. Conversely, anybody who hopes to promote a movie and insists it's "just a movie" and critics should "just relax" while also expecting they take seriously any [[AnAesop Aesop]], CentralTheme, SpeculativeFiction, {{Spectacle}}, or just anything beyond superficial amusement from it is insulting the intelligence of the audience. This is not about critical appraisal, but what is necessary to tell a story. When criticism targets those things that were unexplained because it is irrelevant to the story structure and motivations, ''then'' you can invoke BellisariosMaxim.

This concept is OlderThanSteam, [[JustForFun/TheZerothLawOfTropeExamples also being used in]] Creator/WilliamShakespeare's ''Theatre/AMidsummerNightsDream'': Puck's final speech, which starts "If we shadows have offended/Think but this and all is mended..." can be condensed into "'Tis but a play/I'faith, I should really just relax." This was actually a kind of disclaimer, to mollify people in power who may have construed the subject matter of that and other plays of his as blasphemous and obscene. It still applies to this trope, though.



!Please do not add examples to work pages, this merely [[Administrivia/DefinitionOnlyPages defines the term]].

to:

!Please do not add examples to work pages, this is merely [[Administrivia/DefinitionOnlyPages defines the term]].



->'''Statler''': Maybe they're right. Maybe we should really just relax.\\
'''Waldorf''': Key word, "should." [[ExactWords They never said we have to.]]\\

to:

->'''Statler''': Maybe they're right. Maybe we should really just relax.\\
'''Waldorf''': Key word, Keyword, "should." [[ExactWords They never said we have to.]]\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Now a definition-only page per TRS

Added DiffLines:

!Please do not add examples to work pages, this merely [[Administrivia/DefinitionOnlyPages defines the term]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Updating tag


[[WMG:[[center:[[AC:This trope is [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1618242873019261300&page=1#1 under discussion]] in the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/conversations.php?topic=renames Trope Repair Shop]].]]]]]]

to:

[[WMG:[[center:[[AC:This trope is [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1618242873019261300&page=1#1 under discussion]] in the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/conversations.php?topic=renames Trope Repair Shop]].Administrivia/TropeRepairShop.]]]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
TRS opened

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG:[[center:[[AC:This trope is [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1618242873019261300&page=1#1 under discussion]] in the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/conversations.php?topic=renames Trope Repair Shop]].]]]]]]

Changed: 620

Removed: 459

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


On the other hand, anybody who hopes to promote a movie and insists it's "just a movie" and critics should "just relax" while also expecting they take seriously any Aesop, speculation, spectacle, or anything else of potential value from it is insulting the intelligence of the audience. This is not about critical appraisal, but what is necessary to tell a story. When criticism targets those things that were simply unexplained, ''only then'' should you invoke Bellisario's Maxim.

At the same time however, one should be careful that they do not go too far and use this to justify saying that TheComplainerIsAlwaysWrong. Yes, there's no point in getting excessively worked up and nitpicky about something that, at the end of the day, is just a work of fiction. But using it as a way of brushing off any and all forms of criticism is an equally dangerous attitude to have, and in creators can be a possible sign of a SmallNameBigEgo at work.

to:

On the other hand, anybody who hopes to promote a movie and insists it's "just a movie" and critics should "just relax" while also expecting they take seriously any Aesop, speculation, spectacle, or anything else of potential value from it is insulting the intelligence of the audience. This is not about critical appraisal, but what is necessary to tell a story. When criticism targets those things that were simply unexplained, ''only then'' should you invoke Bellisario's Maxim.

At the same time however, one
One should be careful that they do not go too far and use this to justify saying that TheComplainerIsAlwaysWrong. Yes, there's no point in getting excessively worked up and nitpicky about something that, at the end of the day, is just a work of fiction. But using it as a way of brushing off any and all forms of criticism is an equally dangerous attitude to have, and in creators can be a possible sign of a SmallNameBigEgo at work.
work utilizing DearNegativeReader. Conversely, anybody who hopes to promote a movie and insists it's "just a movie" and critics should "just relax" while also expecting they take seriously any [[AnAesop Aesop]], CentralTheme, SpeculativeFiction, {{Spectacle}}, or just anything beyond superficial amusement from it is insulting the intelligence of the audience. This is not about critical appraisal, but what is necessary to tell a story. When criticism targets those things that were unexplained because it is irrelevant to the story structure and motivations, ''then'' you can invoke BellisariosMaxim.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Like BellisariosMaxim, it is employed in fan communities to ridicule or short-circuit all manner of {{Fan Wank}}y arguments and factual inaccuracy entries.

to:

Like BellisariosMaxim, it is employed in fan communities to ridicule or short-circuit all manner of {{Fan Wank}}y arguments and [[FanWank bizarre fan theories]], factual inaccuracy entries.
entries, and StockParodyJokes.

Top