Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 38 (click to see context) from:
* {{Review}}
to:
* {{Review}}{{Review}}: Evaluating a fictional work in a public manner.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 48 (click to see context) :
* UnacceptableTargets: Lobbing offensive jokes, criticisms, or any kind of insensitive material toward a subject that has a very pure and wholesome image.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HarshTalentShowJudge: A highly critical talent show judge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
* EightPointEight: Backlash results from a review website giving a score that is seen as unfair.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* ComplainingAboutThingsYouHaventPaidFor: Receiving something for free makes someone doubt its merits and write it off too quickly.
to:
* ComplainingAboutThingsYouHaventPaidFor: Receiving Instances where someone gets something for free makes someone doubt its merits and write it off too quickly. of charge, but finds dissatisfaction in it just like if they've been ripped off.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 48 (click to see context) from:
* UnacceptableTargets: Lodging criticisms toward very sensitive and topics without regard for how offensive the criticisms will appear to others.
to:
* UnacceptableTargets: Lodging criticisms toward very sensitive and topics without regard for how Lobbing offensive the criticisms will appear to others.jokes, criticisms, or any kind of insensitive material toward a subject that has a very pure and wholesome image.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 48 (click to see context) from:
* UnacceptableTargets
to:
* UnacceptableTargetsUnacceptableTargets: Lodging criticisms toward very sensitive and topics without regard for how offensive the criticisms will appear to others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* ComplainingAboutThingsYouHaventPaidFor: A reviewer can't afford an expensive product, so they decide to shill it, usually in a vain attempt to devalue the price. It can backfire by drawing ''more'' attention to the product and causing a price hike from the scale of supply and demand tilting to demand.
to:
* ComplainingAboutThingsYouHaventPaidFor: A reviewer can't afford an expensive product, so they decide to shill it, usually in a vain attempt to devalue the price. It can backfire by drawing ''more'' attention to the product Receiving something for free makes someone doubt its merits and causing a price hike from the scale of supply and demand tilting to demand.write it off too quickly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* ComplainingAboutThingsYouHaventPaidFor: A reviewer with can't an afford expensive product, so they decide to shill it, usually in a vain attempt to devalue the price. It can backfire by drawing ''more'' attention to the product and causing a price hike from the scale of supply and demand tilting to demand.
to:
* ComplainingAboutThingsYouHaventPaidFor: A reviewer with can't an afford an expensive product, so they decide to shill it, usually in a vain attempt to devalue the price. It can backfire by drawing ''more'' attention to the product and causing a price hike from the scale of supply and demand tilting to demand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* ComplainingAboutThingsYouHaventPaidFor: A reviewer with slim pockets can't afford an alarmingly expensive product, and in their consternation, they decide to shill it, usually in a vain attempt to devalue the price.
to:
* ComplainingAboutThingsYouHaventPaidFor: A reviewer with slim pockets can't an afford an alarmingly expensive product, and in their consternation, so they decide to shill it, usually in a vain attempt to devalue the price. It can backfire by drawing ''more'' attention to the price.product and causing a price hike from the scale of supply and demand tilting to demand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* ComplainingAboutThingsYouHaventPaidFor
to:
* ComplainingAboutThingsYouHaventPaidForComplainingAboutThingsYouHaventPaidFor: A reviewer with slim pockets can't afford an alarmingly expensive product, and in their consternation, they decide to shill it, usually in a vain attempt to devalue the price.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* CriticBreakdown
to:
* CriticBreakdownCriticBreakdown: A critic comes across a work so traumatizing or aggravating that they freak out with rage or sink into depressed exhaustion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* BadReviewThreat: Threatening to give someone's business am overly negative review.
to:
* BadReviewThreat: Threatening to give someone's business am an overly negative review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added DiffLines:
* BadReviewThreat: Threatening to give someone's business am overly negative review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* StrawCritic: Critics are stereotyped as being perfectionist and impossible to please.
to:
* SexinessScore: Ranking, rating or scoring a character's attractiveness and sexual desirability.
* StrawCritic: Critics are stereotyped as beingperfectionist perfectionists and impossible to please.
* StrawCritic: Critics are stereotyped as being
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 33 (click to see context) :
* LoveItOrHateIt
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontWatch: People complain about a work that they haven't even seen.
to:
* ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontWatch: People complain about a work that they haven't even seen.seen, which doesn't usually reflect well on professional critics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* BrokeTheRatingScale
to:
* BrokeTheRatingScaleBrokeTheRatingScale: A critic establishes that they find what they're currently reviewing exceptionally poor in quality by giving a rating that exceeds how low the scores they give usually go.
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* ComedyGhetto
to:
* ComedyGhettoComedyGhetto: Comedies aren't considered by critics to be works worthy of merit.
Changed line(s) 28 (click to see context) from:
* HireTheCritic
to:
* HireTheCriticHireTheCritic: A creator hires someone who panned their work to participate in the production of their next project.
Changed line(s) 35 (click to see context) from:
* NotScreenedForCritics
to:
* NotScreenedForCriticsNotScreenedForCritics: Critics aren't allowed to review a work until after it has been released, which doesn't usually indicate any confidence on the creators' part that the work is good.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CriticalDissonance: Audiences and professional critics differ heavily in their take on a work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* IdiosyncraticRatingsScale: A critic has a unique, creative way of rating what's being reviewed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6,9 (click to see context) from:
* EightPointEight
* AccentuateTheNegative
* BetterByADifferentName
* BiasSteamroller
* AccentuateTheNegative
* BetterByADifferentName
* BiasSteamroller
to:
* EightPointEight
EightPointEight: Backlash results from a review website giving a score that is seen as unfair.
*AccentuateTheNegative
AccentuateTheNegative: The review focuses only on the negative aspects of the work and barely says anything of the work's merits if at all.
*BetterByADifferentName
BetterByADifferentName: Saying that a work is either a shoddy ripoff of a pre-existing work or a suckier version of a more recent work.
*BiasSteamrollerBiasSteamroller: Critics let personal biases affect their reviews.
*
*
*
Changed line(s) 11,12 (click to see context) from:
* CantTakeCriticism
* CausticCritic
* CausticCritic
to:
* CantTakeCriticism
CantTakeCriticism: A character hates being criticized to the point that even receiving the smallest bit of criticism will enrage them.
*CausticCriticCausticCritic: The critic who has a tendency to give negative reviews.
*
Changed line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) from:
* CompassionateCritic
* ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontWatch
* ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontWatch
to:
* CompassionateCritic
CompassionateCritic: The critic criticizes a person's work solely because they want the person to do better.
*ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontWatchComplainingAboutShowsYouDontWatch: People complain about a work that they haven't even seen.
*
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* ConstructiveCriticism
to:
* ConstructiveCriticismConstructiveCriticism: Criticizing a work because you want the creators to improve it by learning from their mistakes.
Changed line(s) 19,24 (click to see context) from:
* CriticProof
* DamnedByFaintPraise
* DearNegativeReader
* DeliberateFlawRetcon
** ParodyRetcon
* DontLikeDontRead
* DamnedByFaintPraise
* DearNegativeReader
* DeliberateFlawRetcon
** ParodyRetcon
* DontLikeDontRead
to:
* CriticProof
CriticProof: A work does well in spite of being savaged by critics.
*DamnedByFaintPraise
DamnedByFaintPraise: A work is politely insulted by only praising a minor aspect.
*DearNegativeReader
DearNegativeReader: The creator responds to criticism by insulting the audience.
*DeliberateFlawRetcon
DeliberateFlawRetcon: The creator tries to deflect criticism by claiming that the work's flaws were on purpose.
**ParodyRetcon
ParodyRetcon: The creator tries to excuse the work's flaws by claiming that it's not intended to be serious.
*DontLikeDontReadDontLikeDontRead: The creator responds to negative reviews with the rationalization that the reviewers shouldn't be watching works that they dislike.
*
*
*
**
*
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
* HePannedItNowHeSucks
to:
* HePannedItNowHeSucksHePannedItNowHeSucks: A critic receives backlash for giving a negative review of a well-liked work.
Changed line(s) 29 (click to see context) from:
* ItsNotSupposedToWinOscars
to:
* ItsNotSupposedToWinOscarsItsNotSupposedToWinOscars: It's argued that a work doesn't need to win awards to be considered good.
Changed line(s) 41,44 (click to see context) from:
* ReviewsAreTheGospel
* SacredCow
* StrawCritic
* TakeThatCritics
* SacredCow
* StrawCritic
* TakeThatCritics
to:
* ReviewsAreTheGospel
ReviewsAreTheGospel: People judge a work's quality by someone's review of the work rather than by their own viewpoints.
*SacredCow
SacredCow: A work is so popular and well-regarded that saying anything negative about it is a good way to make everyone pissed off at you.
*StrawCritic
StrawCritic: Critics are stereotyped as being perfectionist and impossible to please.
*TakeThatCriticsTakeThatCritics: The creator responds to criticism by insulting their critics.
*
*
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ReviewBlog
Added DiffLines:
* VideoReviewShow
