History Main / ArmyOfLawyers

19th Apr '18 4:07:01 AM bwburke94
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* A [[http://www.endbudgetgridlock.com/Websites/stopthebudgetgames/Images/P25_BriefcaseArmy.mp3 recent radio commercial]] prior to the 2010 November elections in California warned voters that Proposition 25 was being fought by politicians and their "briefcase army" (with appropriate marching sound effects in the background).

to:

* A [[http://www.endbudgetgridlock.com/Websites/stopthebudgetgames/Images/P25_BriefcaseArmy.mp3 recent radio commercial]] prior to the 2010 November elections in California warned voters that Proposition 25 was being fought by politicians and their "briefcase army" (with appropriate marching sound effects in the background).
25th Mar '18 12:43:38 PM Hjortron18
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[caption-width-right:350:[[SoundOff Hut SUE three four, hut SUE three four]]!]]



[[caption-width-right:350:[[SoundOff Hut SUE three four, hut SUE three four]]!]]
8th Mar '18 6:40:07 PM Alvin
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[/folder]]

[[folder: Western Animation ]]
6th Mar '18 1:56:05 PM Schol-R-LEA
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* An early ''WebOriginal/BastardOperatorFromHell'' story from the mid-1990s involves a DreamSequence in which the [[Franchise/StarTrek USS Enterprise]] is attacked by a literal army of Borg-like Microsoft attorneys and can only be saved by Simon the BOFH (who defeats them by [[TakeThat installing Microsoft Windows on their ship]]).

to:

* An early ''WebOriginal/BastardOperatorFromHell'' ''Literature/BastardOperatorFromHell'' story from the mid-1990s involves a DreamSequence in which the [[Franchise/StarTrek USS Enterprise]] is attacked by a literal army of Borg-like Microsoft attorneys and can only be saved by Simon the BOFH (who defeats them by [[TakeThat installing Microsoft Windows on their ship]]).
6th Mar '18 1:55:18 PM Schol-R-LEA
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

* An early ''WebOriginal/BastardOperatorFromHell'' story from the mid-1990s involves a DreamSequence in which the [[Franchise/StarTrek USS Enterprise]] is attacked by a literal army of Borg-like Microsoft attorneys and can only be saved by Simon the BOFH (who defeats them by [[TakeThat installing Microsoft Windows on their ship]]).
[[/folder]]

[[folder: Western Animation ]]
31st Jan '18 3:22:55 AM JustaUsername
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* TruthInTelevision for the infamous [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants "Hot Coffee" lawsuit]]. A 79-year-old woman named Stella Liebeck was sitting in her grandson's car with a cup of coffee from McDonald's placed between her legs as there was no cupholder. The coffee spilled, and because it was served at ''near boiling'' (which was standard practice at the time for McDonald's) and got absorbed into Ms. Liebeck's sweatpants, left her with ''horrific third-degree burns'' on her legs and genitals. (She was not the first person this had happened to, either, and the surgeon who treated her said it was one of the ''worst'' cases he'd ever seen.) She didn't even ''want'' to go to court: she attempted to settle out of court to pay for her medical expenses, but McDonald's only gave her a few hundred dollars (not nearly enough to cover those medical bills). She even admitted that she could have been more careful (and when the case finally ''did'' go to court, the jury found her to be 20% liable). The jury ruled in her favor, and McDonald's was to pay her one day's worth of total coffee sales. (Ultimately, she settled with them for less than that.) They also stopped serving their coffee at such high temperatures and cupholders became standard in most US-made cars. But McDonald's ultimately came out of this the winners: even though they paid Ms. Liebeck a large sum of money for her trouble, they used their corporate lawyers and spin-doctors to depict her to the general public as an idiot who didn't understand that coffee is hot, or someone faking injuries to file a FrivolousLawsuit.

to:

* TruthInTelevision for the infamous [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants "Hot Coffee" lawsuit]]. A 79-year-old woman named Stella Liebeck was sitting in her grandson's car with a cup of coffee from McDonald's [=McDonald's=] placed between her legs as there was no cupholder. The coffee spilled, and because it was served at ''near boiling'' (which was standard practice at the time for McDonald's) [=McDonald's=]) and got absorbed into Ms. Liebeck's sweatpants, left her with ''horrific third-degree burns'' on her legs and genitals. (She was not the first person this had happened to, either, and the surgeon who treated her said it was one of the ''worst'' cases he'd ever seen.) She didn't even ''want'' to go to court: she attempted to settle out of court to pay for her medical expenses, but McDonald's [=McDonald's=] only gave her a few hundred dollars (not nearly enough to cover those medical bills). She even admitted that she could have been more careful (and when the case finally ''did'' go to court, the jury found her to be 20% liable). The jury ruled in her favor, and McDonald's [=McDonald's=] was to pay her one day's worth of total coffee sales. (Ultimately, she settled with them for less than that.) They also stopped serving their coffee at such high temperatures and cupholders became standard in most US-made cars. But McDonald's [=McDonald's=] ultimately came out of this the winners: even though they paid Ms. Liebeck a large sum of money for her trouble, they used their corporate lawyers and spin-doctors to depict her to the general public as an idiot who didn't understand that coffee is hot, or someone faking injuries to file a FrivolousLawsuit.
31st Aug '17 8:10:32 AM angie710
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* TruthInTelevision for the infamous [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants "Hot Coffee" lawsuit]]. An 82-year-old woman named Stella Liebeck was sitting in her grandson's car with a cup of coffee from McDonald's placed between her legs as there was no cupholder. The coffee spilled, and because it was served at ''near boiling'' (which was standard practice at the time for McDonald's) and got absorbed into Ms. Liebeck's sweatpants, left her with ''horrific third-degree burns'' on her legs and genitals. (She was not the first person this had happened to, either, and the surgeon who treated her said it was one of the ''worst'' cases he'd ever seen.) She didn't even ''want'' to go to court: she attempted to settle out of court to pay for her medical expenses, but McDonald's only gave her a few hundred dollars (not nearly enough to cover those medical bills). She even admitted that she could have been more careful (and when the case finally ''did'' go to court, the jury found her to be 20% liable). The jury ruled in her favor, and McDonald's was to pay her one day's worth of total coffee sales. (Ultimately, she settled with them for less than that.) They also stopped serving their coffee at such high temperatures and cupholders became standard in most US-made cars. But McDonald's ultimately came out of this the winners: even though they paid Ms. Liebeck a large sum of money for her trouble, they used their corporate lawyers and spin-doctors to depict her to the general public as an idiot who didn't understand that coffee is hot, or someone faking injuries to file a FrivolousLawsuit.

to:

* TruthInTelevision for the infamous [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants "Hot Coffee" lawsuit]]. An 82-year-old A 79-year-old woman named Stella Liebeck was sitting in her grandson's car with a cup of coffee from McDonald's placed between her legs as there was no cupholder. The coffee spilled, and because it was served at ''near boiling'' (which was standard practice at the time for McDonald's) and got absorbed into Ms. Liebeck's sweatpants, left her with ''horrific third-degree burns'' on her legs and genitals. (She was not the first person this had happened to, either, and the surgeon who treated her said it was one of the ''worst'' cases he'd ever seen.) She didn't even ''want'' to go to court: she attempted to settle out of court to pay for her medical expenses, but McDonald's only gave her a few hundred dollars (not nearly enough to cover those medical bills). She even admitted that she could have been more careful (and when the case finally ''did'' go to court, the jury found her to be 20% liable). The jury ruled in her favor, and McDonald's was to pay her one day's worth of total coffee sales. (Ultimately, she settled with them for less than that.) They also stopped serving their coffee at such high temperatures and cupholders became standard in most US-made cars. But McDonald's ultimately came out of this the winners: even though they paid Ms. Liebeck a large sum of money for her trouble, they used their corporate lawyers and spin-doctors to depict her to the general public as an idiot who didn't understand that coffee is hot, or someone faking injuries to file a FrivolousLawsuit.
31st Aug '17 8:09:30 AM angie710
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

* TruthInTelevision for the infamous [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants "Hot Coffee" lawsuit]]. An 82-year-old woman named Stella Liebeck was sitting in her grandson's car with a cup of coffee from McDonald's placed between her legs as there was no cupholder. The coffee spilled, and because it was served at ''near boiling'' (which was standard practice at the time for McDonald's) and got absorbed into Ms. Liebeck's sweatpants, left her with ''horrific third-degree burns'' on her legs and genitals. (She was not the first person this had happened to, either, and the surgeon who treated her said it was one of the ''worst'' cases he'd ever seen.) She didn't even ''want'' to go to court: she attempted to settle out of court to pay for her medical expenses, but McDonald's only gave her a few hundred dollars (not nearly enough to cover those medical bills). She even admitted that she could have been more careful (and when the case finally ''did'' go to court, the jury found her to be 20% liable). The jury ruled in her favor, and McDonald's was to pay her one day's worth of total coffee sales. (Ultimately, she settled with them for less than that.) They also stopped serving their coffee at such high temperatures and cupholders became standard in most US-made cars. But McDonald's ultimately came out of this the winners: even though they paid Ms. Liebeck a large sum of money for her trouble, they used their corporate lawyers and spin-doctors to depict her to the general public as an idiot who didn't understand that coffee is hot, or someone faking injuries to file a FrivolousLawsuit.
16th Jun '17 8:14:57 PM marcoasalazarm
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

* Defied on an episode of ''Series/{{Bull}}''. A rich man is serioiusly thinking of bringing one of these along to help on his son's courtesy appointment in a PapaWolf moment, but Dr. Bull tells him that this show of legal force would instead piss off the jury and probably make them declare the kid guilty just to get back at the rich people. The Man chooses a SimpleCountryLawyer instead.
16th Jun '17 7:58:42 PM blerg223
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* TruthInTelevision in a more literal way: the US Army has the Judge Advocate General's department, its own legal corps; up until reorganisation in the 1990's, the British Army had its own Royal Army Legal Department (now subsumed into the Royal Logistic Corps). In both cases - if not an army of lawyers in uniform, then certainly at least a batallion.

to:

* TruthInTelevision in a more literal way: the US Army has the Judge Advocate General's department, its own legal corps; up until reorganisation in the 1990's, the British Army had its own Royal Army Legal Department (now subsumed into the Royal Logistic Corps). In both cases - if not an army of lawyers in uniform, then certainly at least a batallion.battalion.
This list shows the last 10 events of 90. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Main.ArmyOfLawyers