Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / TheDraculaTape

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ReligiousHorror: Turned on its head. Dracula is a somewhat lapsed Orthodox Catholic, and considers transformation into a vampire to have no spiritual implications whatsoever. With this in mind, Van Helsing's constant invocation of this trope comes off like the gibbering of a fanatic. Dracula is unsurprised that he thinks crosses will work, but is shocked at the sacrilege of crumbling Communion Hosts into his boxes of earth, a solution that not only does nothing but that Van Helsing apparently made up himself.

to:

* ReligiousHorror: Turned on its head. Dracula is a somewhat lapsed Orthodox Roman Catholic, and considers transformation into a vampire to have no spiritual implications whatsoever. With this in mind, Van Helsing's constant invocation of this trope comes off like the gibbering of a fanatic. Dracula is unsurprised that he thinks crosses will work, but is shocked at the sacrilege of crumbling Communion Hosts into his boxes of earth, a solution that not only does nothing but that Van Helsing apparently made up himself.

Added: 277

Removed: 277

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* VampireBitesSuck: Usually averted, the exchange of blood is sexual in nature for both parties and he doesn't take much. Played straight in ''The Holmes-Dracula File'', where he catches an enemy that had been torturing him while starving to death and just rips her throat out.



* VampireBitesSuck: Usually averted, the exchange of blood is sexual in nature for both parties and he doesn't take much. Played straight in ''The Holmes-Dracula File'', where he catches an enemy that had been torturing him while starving to death and just rips her throat out.

Added: 626

Changed: 60

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AllGirlsWantBadBoys: Played with; both the main female characters of ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'' display a healthy interest in Dracula, ''the'' vampire... except, of course, the whole point of this book is that Dracula ''isn't'' a 'bad boy' (or, at least, isn't the bad guy you thought he was). In fact, it's heavily suggested that the real reason they're interested in him is because, unlike pretty much all the other men in the novel, he treats them respectfully and like they're actual people.

to:

* AllGirlsWantBadBoys: Played with; both the main female characters of ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'' women tend to display a healthy interest in Dracula, ''the'' vampire... except, of course, the whole point of this book is that Dracula ''isn't'' a 'bad boy' (or, at least, isn't the bad guy you thought he was). In fact, it's heavily suggested that the real reason they're interested in him is because, unlike pretty much all the other men in the novel, he treats them respectfully and like they're actual people.


Added DiffLines:

* VampiresAreSexGods: In addition to the canonical seduction of Lucy, Dracula also gets it on with [[spoiler: Mina Harker]], though it's played with; vampires in this universe are not physically capable of sex and the act of biting is treated as this between a vampire and a living person. Also, it's heavily implied that Dracula's success with the ladies isn't down to some kind of sexual mesmerism, but actually because -- unlike the dominant attitude towards women in patriarchal Victorian Britain -- he just treats women respectfully and like they're thinking, intelligent beings with their own autonomy rather than dolls.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AllGirlsWantBadBoys: Played with; both the main female characters of ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'' display a healthy interest in Dracula, ''the'' vampire... except, of course, the whole point of this book is that Dracula ''isn't'' a 'bad boy' (or, at least, isn't the bad guy you thought he was). In fact, it's heavily suggested that the real reason they're interested in him is because, unlike pretty much all the other men in the novel, he treats them respectfully and like they're actual people.


Added DiffLines:

* BlatantLies: Dracula at one point notes that Lucy's incredibly melodramatic recounting of Dracula's "attack" on her and the death of her mother was the very first work of narrative fiction by a centuries old vampire who had only recently learned English and a half-mesmerised young woman slowly dying of blood poisoning and transforming into a vampire, written within barely an hour for the express purpose of trying to throw any suspicion of collusion away from Lucy. And incredibly, it still works.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DeadpanSnarker: Dracula tends to respond sarcastically to the more florid, histrionic and blinkered views of his enemies. As one example, during a battle with them, a knife cuts open Dracula's pocket and spills most of his money on the floor. Dracula dryly notes that his opponent's description of his inhuman, savage rage isn't taking into account the very real fact that Dracula was likely ''annoyed at losing all his money''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EveryoneHasStandards: At one point, Dracula claims that he could have easily overwhelmed and killed the vampire hunters in confrontation -- but doing so would also result in the communion hosts they were armed with (in a misguided belief that it would have any effect on him) becoming contaminated with blood, which would be sacrilegious and offend Dracula's (lapsed) Catholicism.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In a "mainly a jerk from Dracula's point of view" case, Dracula is (grudgingly) willing to concede that maybe, after some very stressful weeks in a terrifying castle with a very strange and apparently supernatural host who doesn't actually explain what his deal, Jonathan Harker was maybe not just being entirely unreasonable when he snapped and ended up trying to kill Dracula a couple of times under the conviction that he was some kind of horrific monster.

to:

** In a "mainly a jerk from Dracula's point of view" case, Dracula is (grudgingly) willing to concede that maybe, after some very stressful weeks in a terrifying castle with a very strange and apparently obviously supernatural host who doesn't actually explain what his deal, deal is, Jonathan Harker was maybe not just being entirely unreasonable or unfair when he snapped and ended up trying to kill Dracula a couple of times under the conviction that he was some kind of horrific monster.

Added: 706

Changed: 241

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* JerkassHasAPoint: Dracula isn't exactly nice, but he does raise some more-or-less good points about why he's not the monster everyone thinks he is -- and how, if he ''was'', he could have had a much easier time against the 'good' guys than he ended up having.

to:

* JerkassHasAPoint: JerkassHasAPoint:
**
Dracula isn't exactly nice, but he does raise some more-or-less good points about why he's not the monster everyone thinks he is -- and how, if he ''was'', he could have had a much easier time against the 'good' guys than he ended up having.having.
** In a "mainly a jerk from Dracula's point of view" case, Dracula is (grudgingly) willing to concede that maybe, after some very stressful weeks in a terrifying castle with a very strange and apparently supernatural host who doesn't actually explain what his deal, Jonathan Harker was maybe not just being entirely unreasonable when he snapped and ended up trying to kill Dracula a couple of times under the conviction that he was some kind of horrific monster.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added list of sequels


** ''An Old Friend of the Family (1979)

to:

** ''An Old Friend of the Family Family'' (1979)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added list of sequels

Added DiffLines:

* [[index]] The ''Dracula'' series consists of:
** ''The Dracula Tape'' (1975)
** ''The Holmes-Dracula File'' (1978)
** ''An Old Friend of the Family (1979)
** ''Thorn'' (1980)
** ''Dominion'' (1982)
** ''From the Tree of Time'' (short story)
** ''A Matter of Taste'' (1990)
** ''A Question of Time'' (1992)
** ''Seance for a Vampire'' (1994) (sequel to ''The Holmes-Dracula File'')
** ''A Sharpness on the Neck'' (1996)
** ''Box Number Fifty'' (short story)
** ''A Coldness In the Blood'' (2002)
[[/index]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* ReligiousVampire: Dracula is [[RaisedCatholic Catholic, but a lapsed one]]. He still finds sacrilegious when Van Helsing uses communion hosts against him.

to:

* ReligiousVampire: Dracula is [[RaisedCatholic Catholic, but a lapsed one]].one. He still finds sacrilegious when Van Helsing uses communion hosts against him.
Tabs MOD

Removed: 218

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


%% * GoOutWithASmile: The original novel's use of this is cynically lampshaded by Dracula, who points out that few things must look as peaceful and relaxing to a bunch of scared vampire hunters than ''a dead vampire''.

Added: 146

Removed: 150

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* TheMole: [[spoiler: Mina Harker was plotting with Dracula and feeding Van Helsing's group misinformation through the latter parts of the book.]]



* ReverseMole: [[spoiler: Mina Harker was plotting with Dracula and feeding Van Helsing's group misinformation through the latter parts of the book.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnreliableNarrator: The premise of the novel is essentially arguing that large chunks of ''Dracula'' suffer from this. Most dramatically, everything from Mina's perspective or said by her in the original book from her first encounter with the Count on are claimed to be outright fabrications the two cooked up together. On the other hand, the Count's not exactly a saint, and it's suggested that he can be as prone to presenting himself in the best possible light as he accuses his enemies of being. Of these the most glaring is the massacre on the ''Demeter'', where Dracula's version rings much less true than in the rest of the tale (he claims that one of the crew snapped and murdered the others more or less by coincidence). Likewise Dracula's justification for Lucy's death, poisoning from improper blood transfusions, feels like an excuse he cooked up much later since blood types were only discovered a after the novel's events and nobody would have known anything about them at the time.

to:

* UnreliableNarrator: The premise of the novel is essentially arguing that large chunks of ''Dracula'' suffer from this. Most dramatically, everything from Mina's perspective or said by her in the original book from her first encounter with the Count on are claimed to be outright fabrications the two cooked up together. On the other hand, the Count's not exactly a saint, and it's suggested that he can be as prone to presenting himself in the best possible light as he accuses his enemies of being. Of these the most glaring is the massacre on the ''Demeter'', where Dracula's version rings much less true than in the rest of the tale (he claims that one of the crew snapped and murdered the others more or less by coincidence). Likewise Dracula's justification for Lucy's death, poisoning from improper blood transfusions, feels can feel like an excuse he cooked up much later since blood types were only discovered a after the novel's events and nobody would have known anything about them at the time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnreliableNarrator: The premise of the novel is essentially arguing that large chunks of ''Dracula'' suffer from this. Most dramatically, everything from Mina's perspective or said by her in the original book from her first encounter with the Count on are claimed to be outright fabrications the two cooked up together. On the other hand, the Count's not exactly a saint, and it's suggested that he can be as prone to presenting himself in the best possible light as he accuses his enemies of being. Of these the most glaring is the massacre on the ''Demeter'', where Dracula's version rings much less true than in the rest of the tale (he claims that one of the crew snapped and murdered the others more or less by coincidence).

to:

* UnreliableNarrator: The premise of the novel is essentially arguing that large chunks of ''Dracula'' suffer from this. Most dramatically, everything from Mina's perspective or said by her in the original book from her first encounter with the Count on are claimed to be outright fabrications the two cooked up together. On the other hand, the Count's not exactly a saint, and it's suggested that he can be as prone to presenting himself in the best possible light as he accuses his enemies of being. Of these the most glaring is the massacre on the ''Demeter'', where Dracula's version rings much less true than in the rest of the tale (he claims that one of the crew snapped and murdered the others more or less by coincidence). Likewise Dracula's justification for Lucy's death, poisoning from improper blood transfusions, feels like an excuse he cooked up much later since blood types were only discovered a after the novel's events and nobody would have known anything about them at the time.



* VanHelsingHateCrimes: Dracula lays this charge squarely on the TropeNamer; while the Harkers are just misguided and misled, Van Helsing is actively malicious.
* VirusVictimSymptoms: The original novel's use of this trope is subverted, with many of the original examples of this explained away as being a result of misinformation, hysteria or complete fabrications. Most of Lucy's are due to the attempts at treatment.

to:

* VanHelsingHateCrimes: Dracula lays this charge squarely on the TropeNamer; while the Harkers are just misguided and misled, Van Helsing is actively malicious.
malicious. Of course given the UnreliableNarrator, how true this characterization is open to question.
* VirusVictimSymptoms: The original novel's use of this trope is subverted, with many of the original examples of this explained away as being a result of misinformation, hysteria or complete fabrications. Most of Lucy's are due to the attempts at treatment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FaceHeelTurn: [[spoiler: Dr Seward in ''The Holmes-Dracula File'' is planning to release a plague on London.]] Absolutely ''no'' explanation for this is given. It is at one point hinted that [[spoiler: he's bitter about being rejected by Mina himself]], but that's about all we get. Strangely, he's still under the delusion that Dracula is a villain himself, and posits forming an alliance with him.

to:

* FaceHeelTurn: [[spoiler: Dr Seward in ''The Holmes-Dracula File'' is planning to release a plague on London.]] Absolutely ''no'' explanation for this is given. It is at one point hinted that [[spoiler: he's bitter about being rejected by Mina himself]], himself, even though he and Mina had no romantic relationship in the original]], but that's about all we get. Strangely, he's still under the delusion that Dracula is a villain himself, and posits forming an alliance with him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Go Out With A Smile is in TRS. ZCE examples are being removed or commented out. Some examples might be moved to Die Laughing or Dying Smirk.


* GoOutWithASmile: The original novel's use of this is cynically lampshaded by Dracula, who points out that few things must look as peaceful and relaxing to a bunch of scared vampire hunters than ''a dead vampire''.

to:

%% * GoOutWithASmile: The original novel's use of this is cynically lampshaded by Dracula, who points out that few things must look as peaceful and relaxing to a bunch of scared vampire hunters than ''a dead vampire''.



* [[IdenticalGrandson Identical Sort-Of Cousin]]: When Dracula and Holmes meet in the first sequel they are mistaken for each other a few times, although by the second meeting Holmes has aged and it is no longer the case. In fact the descriptions of each in the original sources are almost identical, which Dracula-as-narrator points out. It turns out they are related, but not closely.

to:

* [[IdenticalGrandson IdenticalGrandson: Identical Sort-Of Cousin]]: distant cousin. When Dracula and Holmes meet in the first sequel they are mistaken for each other a few times, although by the second meeting Holmes has aged and it is no longer the case. In fact the descriptions of each in the original sources are almost identical, which Dracula-as-narrator points out. It turns out they are related, but not closely.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A 1975 comic-horror-adventure novel by Creator/FredSaberhagen, which offers an [[PerspectiveFlip alternative perspective]] on the horror novel ''Literature/{{Dracula}}''. Specifically, it hinges on a fact about the earlier work that is both glaringly obvious and yet easily missed; of the many testimonials provided to record the battle between the vampire Count Dracula, his nemesis Van Helsing, and Van Helsing's allies, one important perspective has been notably omitted -- that of Count Dracula himself. ''The Dracula Tape'' thus revolves around Dracula, several decades later, deciding to finally address this imbalance by hijacking a car belonging to descendants of the Harkers, his old enemies, and by recording his memoirs of the event in question into their tape recorder.

to:

A 1975 comic-horror-adventure novel by Creator/FredSaberhagen, which offers an [[PerspectiveFlip alternative perspective]] on the horror novel ''Literature/{{Dracula}}''. Specifically, it hinges on a fact about the earlier work that is both glaringly obvious and yet easily missed; of the many first-hand testimonials provided to record the battle between the vampire Count Dracula, his nemesis Van Helsing, and Van Helsing's allies, one important perspective has been notably omitted -- that of Count Dracula himself. ''The Dracula Tape'' thus revolves around Dracula, several decades later, deciding to finally address this imbalance by hijacking a car belonging to descendants of the Harkers, his old enemies, and by recording his memoirs of the event in question into their tape recorder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A 1975 comic-horror-adventure novel by Creator/FredSaberhagen, which offers an [[PerspectiveFlip alternative perspective]] on the horror novel ''Literature/{{Dracula}}''. Specifically, it hinges on a fact about the earlier work that is both glaringly obvious and yet easily missed; of the many testimonials provided to record the battle between the vampire Count Dracula, his nemesis Van Helsing, and Van Helsing's allies, one important perspective has been notably omitted -- that of Count Dracula himself. ''The Dracula Tape'' thus revolves around Dracula, several decades later, decide to finally address this imbalance by hijacking a car belonging to descendants of the Harkers, his old enemies, and by recording his memoirs of the event in question into their tape recorder.

to:

A 1975 comic-horror-adventure novel by Creator/FredSaberhagen, which offers an [[PerspectiveFlip alternative perspective]] on the horror novel ''Literature/{{Dracula}}''. Specifically, it hinges on a fact about the earlier work that is both glaringly obvious and yet easily missed; of the many testimonials provided to record the battle between the vampire Count Dracula, his nemesis Van Helsing, and Van Helsing's allies, one important perspective has been notably omitted -- that of Count Dracula himself. ''The Dracula Tape'' thus revolves around Dracula, several decades later, decide deciding to finally address this imbalance by hijacking a car belonging to descendants of the Harkers, his old enemies, and by recording his memoirs of the event in question into their tape recorder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling and grammar fix.


* ReligiousHorror: Turned on it's head. Dracula is a somewhat lapsed Orthodox Catholic, and considers transformation into a vampire to have no spiritual implications whatsoever. With this in mind, van Helsing's constant invocation of this trope comes off like the gibbering of a fanatic. Dracula is unsurprised that he thinks crosses will work, but is shocked at the sacrilege of crumbling Communion Hosts into his boxes of earth, a solution that not only does nothing but that van Helsing apparently made up himself.

to:

* ReligiousHorror: Turned on it's its head. Dracula is a somewhat lapsed Orthodox Catholic, and considers transformation into a vampire to have no spiritual implications whatsoever. With this in mind, van Van Helsing's constant invocation of this trope comes off like the gibbering of a fanatic. Dracula is unsurprised that he thinks crosses will work, but is shocked at the sacrilege of crumbling Communion Hosts into his boxes of earth, a solution that not only does nothing but that van Van Helsing apparently made up himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AffectionateParody: The whole novel is basically Dracula sarcastically riffing on some of the more messy or questionable aspects of the original story, and complaining about how it misrepresents him...but only a true ''Dracula'' fan could have written a story that mocks the original in such brilliantly exacting detail.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ReligiousVampire: Dracula is Catholic, but a non-practicing one. He still finds sacrilegious when Van Helsing uses communion hosts against him.

to:

* ReligiousVampire: Dracula is [[RaisedCatholic Catholic, but a non-practicing one.lapsed one]]. He still finds sacrilegious when Van Helsing uses communion hosts against him.

Top