History Headscratchers / WWE

18th Jun '15 8:19:42 AM IndirectActiveTransport
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** That handwave doesn't hold up when other pro wrestling feds have "openweight", "universal" "no limit", ect title belts. Of course, WWE doesn't care much about presenting itself as a sport, given the word championship has come to refer to physical objects rather than sporting events. Hell, "championship" in place of "title belt" is almost endemic in pro wrestling in general thanks to WWE, see something relatively free of their taint and the word is always "title" or "belt" with championship being a contest.

to:

** That handwave doesn't hold up when other pro wrestling feds have "openweight", "universal" "no limit", ect title belts. Of course, WWE doesn't care much about presenting itself as a sport, given the word championship has come to refer to physical objects rather than sporting events. Hell, "championship" in place of "title belt" is almost endemic in pro wrestling in general thanks to WWE, see something relatively free of their taint and the word is always "title" or "belt" with championship being a contest. Even then, WWE remains one of the few places with a seeming aversion to the word belt, rather than just a misapplication of championship.
15th Jun '15 10:33:18 AM IndirectActiveTransport
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** If it ever happens it will be decided on the spot most likely with a lot of very intentional controversy. The most logical answers in order would be it would start a triple threat match OR start some kind of really odd two refs watching two matches, possibly with DQs if anybody directly hit the not champion.

to:

** If it ever happens it will be decided on the spot most likely with a lot of very intentional controversy. The most logical answers in order would be it would start a triple threat match OR start some kind of really odd two refs watching two matches, possibly with DQs disqualifications if anybody directly hit the not champion.



*** This was disproven twice. Wrestling/AlbertoDelRio cashed in his MITB on Wrestling/CMPunk, who had just been flattened by a jackknife powerbomb by Wrestling/KevinNash. CM Punk wasn't given a chance to stand up. Then later, Wrestling/RandyOrton's MitB cash-in was after [[Wrestling/BryanDanielson Daniel Bryan]] was laid out by a Pedigree from Wrestling/TripleH. Bryan wasn't given a chance to stand up either.

to:

*** This was disproven twice. Wrestling/AlbertoDelRio cashed in his MITB on Wrestling/CMPunk, who had just been flattened by a jackknife powerbomb by Wrestling/KevinNash. CM Punk wasn't given a chance to stand up. Then later, Wrestling/RandyOrton's MitB MITB cash-in was after [[Wrestling/BryanDanielson Daniel Bryan]] was laid out by a Pedigree from Wrestling/TripleH. Bryan wasn't given a chance to stand up either.
15th Jun '15 10:32:29 AM IndirectActiveTransport
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Why do MITB winners forget that the rules of the contract are you get a match when you want? It seems like the standard strategy is to wait until they've had an usually difficult match but there is nothing preventing the winner from using the brief case like the same way the Hardcore Championship used to work. You'd think someone like Wrestling/DamianSandow or any genre savvy heel would blind side you in the middle of an interview and pin you then.

to:

* Why do MITB winners forget that the rules of the contract are you get a match when you want? It seems like the standard strategy is to wait until they've had an usually difficult match but there is nothing preventing the winner from using the brief case like the same way the Hardcore Championship used to work. You'd think someone like Wrestling/DamianSandow Wrestling/DamienSandow or any genre savvy heel would blind side you in the middle of an interview and pin you then.



*** This was disproven twice. Wrestling/AlbertoDelRio cashed in his MitB on Wrestling/CMPunk, who had just been flattened by a jackknife powerbomb by Wrestling/KevinNash. CM Punk wasn't given a chance to stand up. Then later, Wrestling/RandyOrton's MitB cash-in was after [[Wrestling/BryanDanielson Daniel Bryan]] was laid out by a Pedigree from Wrestling/TripleH. Bryan wasn't given a chance to stand up either.

to:

*** This was disproven twice. Wrestling/AlbertoDelRio cashed in his MitB MITB on Wrestling/CMPunk, who had just been flattened by a jackknife powerbomb by Wrestling/KevinNash. CM Punk wasn't given a chance to stand up. Then later, Wrestling/RandyOrton's MitB cash-in was after [[Wrestling/BryanDanielson Daniel Bryan]] was laid out by a Pedigree from Wrestling/TripleH. Bryan wasn't given a chance to stand up either.
15th Jun '15 10:32:10 AM IndirectActiveTransport
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Because they did not do that, they never tried to pass them off as the real thing and people that didn't do the research just assumed they did. For more information about it see what I wrote at [[http://www.411mania.com/wrestling/columns/76474/Ask-411-Wrestling-05.28.08:-FAQ-Part-1!.htm Ask411 which was recently reposted in their FAQs column]].

to:

** Because they did not do that, they never tried to pass them off as the real thing and people that didn't do the research just assumed they did. For more information about it see what I wrote at [[http://www.411mania.com/wrestling/columns/76474/Ask-411-Wrestling-05.28.08:-FAQ-Part-1!.htm Ask411 which was recently reposted riposted in their FAQs column]].



*** Vince, according to some reports, is not the kind of guy who responds well to criticism. So it very well might have been that everybody was scared to tell him it was a bad idea for fear of the consequences. One example I read about: in 2004 fans were losing interest in WWE, and none of Vince's yes-men would tell him what was wrong with the product. So he brought Pat Patterson out of semi-retirement, since Patterson had always been straight with him. (No pun intended.) Patterson examined the problem, and finally told Vince that it might be a good idea for TripleH not to destroy everybody he went up against and for them to focus less on Hunter and more on building new stars. This was not received well, and Patterson was let go.

to:

*** Vince, according to some reports, is not the kind of guy who responds well to criticism. So it very well might have been that everybody was scared to tell him it was a bad idea for fear of the consequences. One example I read about: in 2004 fans were losing interest in WWE, and none of Vince's yes-men would tell him what was wrong with the product. So he brought Pat Patterson out of semi-retirement, since Patterson had always been straight with him. (No pun intended.) Patterson examined the problem, and finally told Vince that it might be a good idea for TripleH Triple H not to destroy everybody he went up against and for them to focus less on Hunter and more on building new stars. This was not received well, and Patterson was let go.



** Matt killed Jeff's dog? What the hell? Where was I when this was said?! Unless it was a joke, I don't think even a wrestler would get away with illegally killing an animal (or arson for that matter with the house), unless laws in America allow ruthelessly killing defenceless animals perfectly legal.

to:

** Matt killed Jeff's dog? What the hell? Where was I when this was said?! Unless it was a joke, I don't think even a wrestler would get away with illegally killing an animal (or arson for that matter with the house), unless laws in America allow ruthelessly ruthlessly killing defenceless animals perfectly legal.



*** Because heel comentators are usually AffablyEvil and most people love them, Wrestling/BobbyHeenan, Wrestling/CMPunk and Wrestling/{{Tazz}} are hilarious, and they play the heelish comentator role. And Heel [[Wrestling/MichaelCole Cole]] is awesome, and complaining stupidly about the faces makes one like the faces more.

to:

*** Because heel comentators are usually AffablyEvil and most people love them, Wrestling/BobbyHeenan, Wrestling/CMPunk and Wrestling/{{Tazz}} are hilarious, and they play the heelish comentator commentator role. And Heel [[Wrestling/MichaelCole Cole]] is awesome, and complaining stupidly about the faces makes one like the faces more.



** Actually the purpose of a heel commentator is to have someone on the commentating team who likes the heel on top of excusing any heel like actions the heel may commit in the match this essentially allows the heel commentator to not only come off as villian but also allows them to garner large amount of heat from viewers watching on TV, so basically if you hate heel commentators they have successfully done the job they're supposed be doing.

to:

** Actually the purpose of a heel commentator is to have someone on the commentating team who likes the heel on top of excusing any heel like actions the heel may commit in the match this essentially allows the heel commentator to not only come off as villian villain but also allows them to garner large amount of heat from viewers watching on TV, so basically if you hate heel commentators they have successfully done the job they're supposed be doing.



** That handwave doesn't hold up when other pro wrestling feds have "openweight", "universal" "no limit", ect title belts. Of course, WWE doesn't care much about presenting itself as a sport, given the word championship has come to refer to physical objects rather than sporting events. Hell, "championship" in place of "title belt" is almost endemic in pro wrestling in general thanks to WWE, see something relatively free of their taint and the word is always "title" or "belt" with championship being a contest.



** This happened during the main event of WrestleMania 31, and it turned into a triple threat match.
* Why do MITB winners forget that the rules of the contract are you get a match when you want? It seems like the standard strategy is to wait until they've had an usually difficult match but there is nothing preventing the winner from using the brief case like the same way the Hardcore Championship used to work. You'd think someone like Damian Sandow or any genre savvy heel would blind side you in the middle of an interview and pin you then.

to:

** This happened during the main event of WrestleMania Wrestlemania 31, and it turned into a triple threat match.
* Why do MITB winners forget that the rules of the contract are you get a match when you want? It seems like the standard strategy is to wait until they've had an usually difficult match but there is nothing preventing the winner from using the brief case like the same way the Hardcore Championship used to work. You'd think someone like Damian Sandow Wrestling/DamianSandow or any genre savvy heel would blind side you in the middle of an interview and pin you then.



*** This was disproven twice. ProfessionalWrestling/AlbertoDelRio cashed in his MitB on ProfessionalWrestling/CMPunk, who had just been flattened by a jackknife powerbomb by ProfessionalWrestling/KevinNash. CM Punk wasn't given a chance to stand up. Then later, ProfessionalWrestling/RandyOrton's MitB cash-in was after [[ProfessionalWrestling/BryanDanielson Daniel Bryan]] was laid out by a Pedigree from ProfessionalWrestling/TripleH. Bryan wasn't given a chance to stand up either.

to:

*** This was disproven twice. ProfessionalWrestling/AlbertoDelRio Wrestling/AlbertoDelRio cashed in his MitB on ProfessionalWrestling/CMPunk, Wrestling/CMPunk, who had just been flattened by a jackknife powerbomb by ProfessionalWrestling/KevinNash.Wrestling/KevinNash. CM Punk wasn't given a chance to stand up. Then later, ProfessionalWrestling/RandyOrton's Wrestling/RandyOrton's MitB cash-in was after [[ProfessionalWrestling/BryanDanielson [[Wrestling/BryanDanielson Daniel Bryan]] was laid out by a Pedigree from ProfessionalWrestling/TripleH.Wrestling/TripleH. Bryan wasn't given a chance to stand up either.
5th Apr '15 10:51:15 AM sniperfox29
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** Tank Abbot in WCW won by KO, and no, he did not get massively over.
30th Mar '15 6:02:34 AM HumanTorch2
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** This happened during the main event of WrestleMania 31, and it turned into a triple threat match.
22nd Jan '15 9:42:55 AM IndirectActiveTransport
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** His name is Chris Hero and he throws elbows.

to:

*** His name is Chris Hero Wrestling/ChrisHero and he throws elbows.
1st May '14 11:48:04 AM KeithM
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

**** The incident took place in 2002: HHH didn't marry Steph (for real), and thus have real backstage power because he was now in the family, until the next year.
29th Apr '14 9:57:24 AM LittleJon
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** You must have missed the Al Snow and Big Bossman feud when Bossman fed Al Snow "Pepper steak".
21st Apr '14 9:23:51 AM ggultra2764
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** It doesn't make those PPVs unique. With gimmick matches like TLC or Extreme Rules matches, they were always there as a blow-off to any major long-term storyline feud they had going on between opponents. Money in the Bank, Royal Rumble and Elimination Chamber make sense in that you never know who could come out on top in them, which adds that sense of unpredictability to them. But for other gimmick-themed PPVs like TLC or Hell in the Cell, they're just there to set up matches without the storyline buildup used for feuds before the PG era and it makes things predictable because you know there's gonna be a gimmick match that doesn't build up into anything other than its a gimmick match going along with the PPV's name.
This list shows the last 10 events of 373. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Headscratchers.WWE