History Headscratchers / StarTrekVTheFinalFrontier

24th Dec '16 8:54:45 AM TheMysteriousTroper
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** I thought that Kirk was referring to the loss of his biological brother and implying that Spock had replaced George in his life. However, this slights McCoy. Kirk should have said "I lost a brother once. i was lucky; I got him back. ''[Looks at Spock and then McCoy]'' I got him back twice."

to:

*** I thought that Kirk was referring to the loss of his biological brother and implying that Spock had replaced George in his life. However, this slights McCoy.[=McCoy=]. Kirk should have said "I lost a brother once. i was lucky; I got him back. ''[Looks at Spock and then McCoy]'' [=McCoy=]]'' I got him back twice."
13th Dec '16 8:52:35 AM costanton11
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** The Klingon ambassador, Koord, has explicitly been given the Nimbus III assignment because he's out of favour. The Klingons were hardly likely to rustle up the cavalry for his sake.

to:

*** The Klingon ambassador, Koord, has explicitly been given the Nimbus III assignment because he's out of favour.favor. The Klingons were hardly likely to rustle up the cavalry for his sake.



** This is just one of the more egregious Star Trek speed errors. TNG had the Enterprise end up over 2 MILLION light years from Earth and Data says that it would take approximately 100 years to get home. By contrast, Voyager going 70,000 light years would taken 70 years. That means the Enterprise D could go 20 times faster than Voyager... it's fair to say that writers really need to try and leave distances out because they ALWAYS screw them up and end up travelling at the speed of plot.
*** Warp 10 = 1,000c; the Designated top Speed applies WITHIN the Galaxy. 2M ly is empty space BETWEEN galaxies. Maybe you can go faster if there ain't all thse frackin stars in the way?

to:

** This is just one of the more egregious Star Trek speed errors. TNG had the Enterprise end up over 2 MILLION light years from Earth and Data says that it would take approximately 100 years to get home. By contrast, Voyager going 70,000 light years would taken 70 years. That means the Enterprise D could go 20 times faster than Voyager... it's fair to say that writers really need to try and leave distances out because they ALWAYS screw them up and end up travelling traveling at the speed of plot.
*** Warp 10 = 1,000c; the Designated top Speed applies WITHIN the Galaxy. 2M ly is empty space BETWEEN galaxies. Maybe you can go faster if there ain't all thse these frackin stars in the way?



FridgeLogic time. In ''Film/{{Star Trek V|The Final Frontier}}'', there is a toilet in the brig that warns: "DO NOT USE WHILE IN SPACEDOCK". So... why ''would'' there be a problem with this? Maybe it's just sadistic SchmuckBait for the rulebreakers in the brig? And nobody [[IncrediblyLamePun gives a crap]] when they ''[[PottyEmergency need]]'' to take a crap, of course. I'm wondering if it's AllThereInTheManual.

to:

FridgeLogic time. In ''Film/{{Star Trek V|The Final Frontier}}'', there is a toilet in the brig that warns: "DO NOT USE WHILE IN SPACEDOCK". So... why ''would'' there be a problem with this? Maybe it's just sadistic SchmuckBait for the rulebreakers rule breakers in the brig? And nobody [[IncrediblyLamePun gives a crap]] when they ''[[PottyEmergency need]]'' to take a crap, of course. I'm wondering if it's AllThereInTheManual.



* Once you get to Spacedock, whoever is in the brig is taken to the Spacedock's brig. There shouldn't be anyone except maintenece in there anyway, so not flushing could mean the difference between sucking Ricky Redshirt out into space.

to:

* Once you get to Spacedock, whoever is in the brig is taken to the Spacedock's brig. There shouldn't be anyone except maintenece maintenance in there anyway, so not flushing could mean the difference between sucking Ricky Redshirt out into space.



** At the end, Klaa is seen apologizing to Kirk for his actions (with Koord looming over him indimidatingly) and emphasizing that his actions were taken without approval of the High Council. Basically, since he didn't actually manage to hurt anyone, and his following of the ''Enterprise'' led to the rescue of Kirk, he wasn't executed for his violating his orders (probably something along the lines of "here's a sector, stay here and patrol it"). If you look closely in the [[{{Film/StarTrekVITheUndiscoveredCountry}} next film]] you can see that Klaa has been removed from starship command and put on translation duty, so it's obvious that he pissed someone off, but not enough to get executed for it.

to:

** At the end, Klaa is seen apologizing to Kirk for his actions (with Koord looming over him indimidatingly) intimidatingly) and emphasizing that his actions were taken without approval of the High Council. Basically, since he didn't actually manage to hurt anyone, and his following of the ''Enterprise'' led to the rescue of Kirk, he wasn't executed for his violating his orders (probably something along the lines of "here's a sector, stay here and patrol it"). If you look closely in the [[{{Film/StarTrekVITheUndiscoveredCountry}} next film]] you can see that Klaa has been removed from starship command and put on translation duty, so it's obvious that he pissed someone off, but not enough to get executed for it.
5th Aug '16 5:09:26 PM AnotherGuy
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* WordOfGod says Kirk was talking about ''memorializing'' him, not actual resurrection.
6th May '16 8:21:17 AM Bense
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Maybe Starfleet is a little over-sensitive about Kirk taking over command of a starship from its regular captain, since whenever he does it the former captain inevitably ends up dead? Sure Spock got better, but Decker has never been heard from again.
28th Apr '16 11:26:09 AM costanton11
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder: We need James Kirk]]
* Kirk protests the Enterprise being sent on the mission since its a mess. He says that there has to be other ships and the admiral says that they have working ships but no experienced captains. Why not just have Kirk take command of one of those ships for the duration of the mission?
18th Mar '16 2:44:44 PM StarTropes
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

** I'll do you all better. In ''The Autobiography of James T. Kirk'', it's stated that this movie is in fact a movie made on the planet of SpaceRomans from [[Recap/StarTrekS2E25BreadAndCircuses "Bread and Circuses."]] Kirk and his officers saw the movie when they returned to the planet and saw fans remarkably similar to modern-day Trekkies, complete with homemade Starfleet uniforms.
18th Mar '16 7:11:19 AM StarTropes
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Nimbus III was not a great assignment; in fact, Film/StarTrekTheVITheUndiscoveredCountry shows that the Romulan government actually has an ambassador on Earth, so Nimbus III representative was completely useless. It's unlikely that anybody who was given the position of ambassador to that world was particularly favored by the government that sent them there. Add that to the fact that the Neutral Zone is a DMZ, and it seems unlikely that the Romulans would assign a warship to drop her off. Sybok needed something fast and powerful like a cruiser to get where he needed to go, and to get anyone to send one, he needed a crisis. He's just lucky that Starfleet responded first, as the Romulans or the Klingons probably would have resolved the situation with much more violence.

to:

** Nimbus III was not a great assignment; in fact, Film/StarTrekTheVITheUndiscoveredCountry ''Film/StarTrekVITheUndiscoveredCountry'' shows that the Romulan government actually has an ambassador on Earth, so Nimbus III representative was completely useless. It's unlikely that anybody who was given the position of ambassador to that world was particularly favored by the government that sent them there. Add that to the fact that the Neutral Zone is a DMZ, and it seems unlikely that the Romulans would assign a warship to drop her off. Sybok needed something fast and powerful like a cruiser to get where he needed to go, and to get anyone to send one, he needed a crisis. He's just lucky that Starfleet responded first, as the Romulans or the Klingons probably would have resolved the situation with much more violence.
12th Jan '16 8:26:32 PM DonM435
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

**** I thought that Kirk was referring to the loss of his biological brother and implying that Spock had replaced George in his life. However, this slights McCoy. Kirk should have said "I lost a brother once. i was lucky; I got him back. ''[Looks at Spock and then McCoy]'' I got him back twice."
18th Dec '15 9:21:46 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* What's going on with Klaa, the commander of the Klingon bird-of-prey? He's introduced to us when he destroys Pioneer 10, which SFDebris points out will only be barely outside our solar system (Starfleet headquarters and the capitol of the Federation) by the 23[[superscript:rd]] century. He takes on the mission to Nimbus III just because he's bored, and on his own initiative, he launches an unprovoked attack on ''Enterprise'' which was engaged in rescuing diplomats (including a Klingon official) from a hostage situation. Then, he follows ''Enterprise'' literally to the center of the galaxy just to launch another unprovoked attack. Does Klaa answer to the Klingon military? If he does, why would it allow Klaa to so casually risk war with the Federation ''and''--considering the Romulan ambassador aboard ''Enterprise'', and their eagerness to kill Klingons at the slightest provocation--the Romulan Empire?

to:

* What's going on with Klaa, the commander of the Klingon bird-of-prey? He's introduced to us when he destroys Pioneer 10, which SFDebris WebSite/SFDebris points out will only be barely outside our solar system (Starfleet headquarters and the capitol of the Federation) by the 23[[superscript:rd]] century. He takes on the mission to Nimbus III just because he's bored, and on his own initiative, he launches an unprovoked attack on ''Enterprise'' which was engaged in rescuing diplomats (including a Klingon official) from a hostage situation. Then, he follows ''Enterprise'' literally to the center of the galaxy just to launch another unprovoked attack. Does Klaa answer to the Klingon military? If he does, why would it allow Klaa to so casually risk war with the Federation ''and''--considering the Romulan ambassador aboard ''Enterprise'', and their eagerness to kill Klingons at the slightest provocation--the Romulan Empire?
22nd Nov '15 6:33:16 AM thatsnumberwang
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Surely though, as Star Trek V came first, the mistake is with Voyager and not this film? And in regards to the black hole, just because it exists in the real world, doesn't mean it has to exist here. It may have started out as just ''the future'', but even if you want to retcon the eugenics wars in 1996, 2024 will see the sanctuary districts of San Francisco and 2026 will see world war 3.
This list shows the last 10 events of 48. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Headscratchers.StarTrekVTheFinalFrontier