History Headscratchers / StarTrekVItheUndiscoveredCountry

22nd Jul '17 11:52:59 AM NewVirginiaCreeper
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Another point worth raising is that, while the Klingons and Romulans may be enemies at this point, they were allies in recent memory. It seems absurd to deliberately share sensitive material with the Romulan ambassador if there's a chance that his loyalties might be in question (which they are!).
17th Jul '17 9:08:29 AM Bense
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

**** [=McCoy=] was "just standing around on the bridge?" Why was [=McCoy=] standing around on the bridge while the Klingons were blowing holes clean through the ''Enterprise'' every few seconds, no doubt causing lots of casualties?
17th Jul '17 9:05:44 AM Bense
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* This issue has already been addressed at least twice on this page. Look in the "No Plans, No Backup" and "Prototype Revisited" folders.
16th Jul '17 5:28:20 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** The Russian ambassador in real life probably did understand English just fine. He was an ambassador, understanding one of the most-used languages in the world (Japanese sailors had to learn it during WW2 because a lot of their charts and machine manuals were printed in English) would have been necessary for his job. Kirk and [=McCoy=] aren't ambassadors, so in Chang's case it ''was'' purely grandstanding (instead of only partly).

to:

*** The Russian ambassador in real life probably did understand English just fine. He was an ambassador, understanding one of the most-used languages in the world (Japanese sailors had to learn it during WW2 [=WW2=] because a lot of their charts and machine manuals were printed in English) would have been necessary for his job. Kirk and [=McCoy=] aren't ambassadors, so in Chang's case it ''was'' purely grandstanding (instead of only partly).
16th Jul '17 3:25:08 PM costanton11
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** Chekov was the one who fired the torpedo when they tracked the ship and they probably needed him to main the weapons console. [=McCoy=] on the other hand was just standing around on the bridge, so they might as well put him to work. In any case, [=McCoy's=] part in the torpedo re-programing was mainly just handing Spock the parts he asks for, so there isn't much qualification needed. Plus, I've seen it suggested elsewhere that given that it was a delicate procedure, a steady hand like a surgeon's would be of use.
15th Jul '17 10:54:56 PM thespecialneedsgroup
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** You're forgetting, though, that the apparently unrestricted access to phasers aboard ''Enterprise'' actually ''did'' result in several murders in this very film. Not only that, but the search for Gorkon's assassins could have been a lot shorter if there were some record of who aboard ''Enterprise'' had checked a phaser out of the ship's armory, and when.
14th Jul '17 4:19:03 PM Ohio9
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* The movie makes it very clear that the ability to fire ship weapons while cloaked is a revolutionary technological advancement in space combat. So why do we never see them use it again in any Star Trek film or episode? I know the ship was destroyed, but obviously the specs for the technology must be been recorded so they could make other ships that have it.

to:

* The *The movie makes it very clear that the ability to fire ship weapons while cloaked is a revolutionary technological advancement in space combat. So why do we never see them use it again in any Star Trek film or episode? I know the ship was destroyed, but obviously the specs for the technology must be been recorded so they could make other ships that have it.


Added DiffLines:

*** But wouldn't Klingon technology improve to work against attempted countermeasures as well? I get the impression roughly 99% of Klingon science is dedicated to combat. So I'm sure they would work on finding ways to keep the ship better hidden. It just seems silly to use it once and then totally abandon it when it was in its prototype stage. Even if it doesn't make a ship invincible, you just gotta figure it would always be better to have the ability to fire while cloaked then to not have that ability. It's not like having that ability give you any disadvantages.
14th Jul '17 1:14:07 PM thatsnumberwang
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[/folder]]

to:

[[/folder]]
*** Scotty was of far more use trying to keep their broken ship working long enough for them to actually fire the torpedo in the first place. If for some reason that it had to be a senior officer, Chekov would make the most sense as he is the ship's tactical officer and it wasn't as if he was firing the guns much at their invisible enemy anyway.
[[/folder]]


Added DiffLines:

** Is it that revolutionary though? Because it seems to me that the only reason it worked so well to begin with is because no one had ever fought anything like it before. The moment anyone starts to field these things on mass, all that Starfleet would need to do is to start carrying some dedicated ionized gas homing torpedoes as standard and that would be that. And that is just the solution that the crew went with; what about the massive amounts of neutron radiation the thing releases? Or the fact that the torpedo tube is clearly visible when firing? If the science and engineering divisions of the Federation are famous for anything it is developing solutions to previously impassable problems very quickly.
14th Jul '17 12:26:08 AM Ohio9
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[folder]: The Klingons never use their new "Fire while cloaked" technology again?]].
* The movie makes it very clear that the ability to fire while cloaked is a revolutionary technological advancement in space combat. So why do we never see them use it again in any Star Trek film or episode? I know the ship was destroyed, but obviously the specs for the technology must be been recorded so they could make other ships that have it.

to:

[[folder]: [[folder: The Klingons never use their new "Fire while cloaked" technology again?]].
again?]]
* The movie makes it very clear that the ability to fire ship weapons while cloaked is a revolutionary technological advancement in space combat. So why do we never see them use it again in any Star Trek film or episode? I know the ship was destroyed, but obviously the specs for the technology must be been recorded so they could make other ships that have it.
14th Jul '17 12:25:10 AM Ohio9
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:


[[folder]: The Klingons never use their new "Fire while cloaked" technology again?]].
* The movie makes it very clear that the ability to fire while cloaked is a revolutionary technological advancement in space combat. So why do we never see them use it again in any Star Trek film or episode? I know the ship was destroyed, but obviously the specs for the technology must be been recorded so they could make other ships that have it.
[[/folder]]
This list shows the last 10 events of 281. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Headscratchers.StarTrekVItheUndiscoveredCountry