History Headscratchers / EnglishLanguage

20th Sep '16 3:32:34 PM EmpressMatilda
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** Iraq, Iraqi, faqir... there are a number of others. This particular rant was triggered by a reminder of the scene in ''Game of Thrones'' where Daenerys first reaches Qarth and says it wrong. (Which is kinda funny in itself, since shouldn't the Westerosi lands have their own alphabets?)

to:

*** Iraq, Iraqi, faqir... there are a number of others. This particular rant was triggered by a reminder of the scene in ''Game of Thrones'' where Daenerys first reaches Qarth and says it wrong. (Which is kinda funny in itself, since shouldn't the Westerosi lands have their own alphabets?)alphabets?)
**** she's never seen it written and only heard it in Dothraki, a very harsh language, in which, had it been pronounced Quarth, they would have pronounced it Karth, so she assumes it's actually pronounce Quarth, instead of Qarth
20th Sep '16 3:27:24 PM EmpressMatilda
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

**It's dialectal. In British English it's more like pretty/kinda, whereas in American English it's more like very
31st Jul '16 8:31:38 PM TheArbiterOfTruth
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** This troper has heard that expression used, especially in the context of wild, long, and unkempt hair. As for why it isn't used more often, my guess is that people usually associate a mane with the hair on an animal's neck, usually a lion or horse. So if humans can have manes, the term should refer to rat-tails or neckbeards.
19th Jul '16 2:00:29 PM SenseiLeRoof
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

**** Sure, they exist, but I think they agree that the "teen" is a lot less notable than the "hundred".
20th May '16 6:48:14 AM Jhimmibhob
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** I do wish that English would use a few limited diacritical marks, which could really help clear up some confusing things about the written language. Just as an example: use ''read'' for the present tense of the verb, and ''rèad'' for the past tense; ''lead'' for the verb, and ''lèad'' for the metal. It could even be optional. Now, this would probably end up adding inconsistencies on top of an already-huge pile of inconsistencies, but I think the benefits would outweigh the drawbacks. (And yes, I know it's about as unlikely to happen as any other English spelling reform.)
19th May '16 6:03:53 PM erforce
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Why is "ain't" shunned, even when used in first person, like in "if that was a joke, why ain't I laughing?" or "[[Film/{{Ghostbusters}} I ain't afraid of no ghost]]" (and yes, the double negative is still a mistake)? It would be very handy as a contraction for "am not". On the other hand, if the contraction for "am I not?" is "aren't I?", why is "I aren't" still wrong?

to:

* Why is "ain't" shunned, even when used in first person, like in "if that was a joke, why ain't I laughing?" or "[[Film/{{Ghostbusters}} "[[Franchise/{{Ghostbusters}} I ain't afraid of no ghost]]" (and yes, the double negative is still a mistake)? It would be very handy as a contraction for "am not". On the other hand, if the contraction for "am I not?" is "aren't I?", why is "I aren't" still wrong?
6th Jan '16 9:04:53 AM jbr
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Yeah, I'd say this guy nailed it. For more info on the various problems with reform, go read [[http://www.xibalba.demon.co.uk/jbr/ortho.html Spelling Reform: And the Real Reason It's Impossible]], by Justin B. Rye.

to:

** Yeah, I'd say this guy nailed it. For more info on the various problems with reform, go read [[http://www.xibalba.demon.co.uk/jbr/ortho.[[http://jbr.me.uk/ortho.html Spelling Reform: And the Real Reason It's Impossible]], by Justin B. Rye.
31st Oct '15 1:29:36 AM SenseiLeRoof
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Because the apostrophe is there to replace the missing '''letter''', not the space.
*** Which doesn't explain "won't", from will not, we will drop the 'ill' then reverse the n and o, then stick an apostrophe in there

to:

** Because the apostrophe is there to replace the missing '''letter''', '''letter(s)''', not the space.
*** Which doesn't explain "won't", from will not, we will drop the 'ill' then reverse the n and o, then stick an apostrophe in therethere.
*** Dictionary.com says "won't" was first recorded as "wynnot", then "wonnot", and from there "won't". It still applies, you just have to do some research.
27th Oct '15 8:24:24 PM laserviking42
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** Which doesn't explain "won't", from will not, we will drop the 'ill' then reverse the n and o, then stick an apostrophe in there
28th Sep '15 8:28:07 AM Jhimmibhob
Is there an issue? Send a Message


**** "Y'all" is singular. The plural form of "y'all," used when addressing a group of people collectively, is: "all y'all." Go figure...
This list shows the last 10 events of 210. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Headscratchers.EnglishLanguage