History Headscratchers / CivilWar

15th Aug '17 12:07:57 PM AndyLA
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Because that was pretty much the most inescapable place the [[SarcasmMode geniuses]] could think of. They didn't think that Annihilus could stop by and thrash the place and kill everyone inside, they just didn't want a place the Antis could escape easily like, say, the Raft.
28th Jul '17 4:29:50 PM AndyLA
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

*** Just the fact they retconned this conversation in ''Comicbook/SecretEmpire'' to have Sally Floyd mention Twitter instead of [=MySpace=] shows how off-base she was in the issue.
9th Jul '17 12:11:13 PM Dr.XXX
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Why did the ding-dongs in charge of the pro-regs think it was a good idea to build a prison in the Negative Zone? First, there are a legion of bug monsters that live there that are far more willing to maim and kill the prisoners. Second, it is a place that induces misery and woe by being there for a long time.
6th Jul '17 10:15:44 PM Ansongc2000
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

*** Except many heroes (Daredevil, Luke Cage, Punisher, Spiderman, the X-Men) only use the system when it's convenient for them, and in general, it's been shown through elseworlds and alternate timelines that most heroes put their morals above laws, and will revolt against the government if they feel it's becoming tyrranical. That's not to totally discredit the pro-reg side, but you'd think that the fear of the (as stated above) omnipresent corruption in the MU government that the heroes know about would be just as big if not bigger a talking-point of the anti-reg side that plattitudes about freedom.
11th May '17 11:32:57 AM ImaginaryMetroid
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Yes, that's exactly what they thought; and the story acknowledges how stupid was that. It is one of the reasons why a SHRA was needed in the first place: to prevent any LeeroyJenkins with super powers to run to his death and cause massive deaths and property damages by accident.

to:

** Yes, that's exactly what they thought; and the story acknowledges how stupid was that.that was. It is one of the reasons why a SHRA was needed in the first place: to prevent any LeeroyJenkins with super powers to run to his death and cause massive deaths and property damages by accident.
3rd May '17 6:00:57 PM jm0914
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

**** Actually, mutants were exempted from registration. Civil War took place after House of M and therefore M-Day, when the total mutant population of the world was reduced to 200 individuals. The entire reason Hope Summers was such a big deal was because she was the FIRST MUTANT TO MANIFEST after M-Day, well after Civil War because the X-Men were on Utopia. The government basically declared mutants an endangered species and said that as long as a mutant remained on the grounds of the Intsitute, they were both exempted from the act and guaranteed government protection. They basically turned the school into a wildlife refuge for mutants. Which opened up a whole new can of worms, but...
13th Mar '17 6:00:47 PM Ferot_Dreadnaught
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** That's actually a huge part of why the entire arc is flawed ''from the start''. Really, the best way to have kicked it off if they had really wanted it to be GrayAndGrayMorality would have been to have no villains (super or otherwise) involved: make it [[CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot a completely avoidable disaster]] that deconstructs just how wrong things could go with very new, very powerful superheroes who get the traditional (total lack of) training and have the relatively common PowerIncontinence problems. It'd even be the easiest time ever to invoke NothingIsTheSameAnymore and do it truthfully: after something like that it'd be reasonable for everybody to agree that the old status quo is no longer acceptable, and the disagreement would then be entirely over what should replace it. No matter who'd win, there ''would'' be changes, and you wouldn't even need to kill off any extra characters to do it.

to:

*** That's actually a huge part of why the entire arc is flawed ''from the start''. Really, the best way to have kicked it off if they had really wanted it to be GrayAndGrayMorality would have been to have no villains (super or otherwise) involved: make it [[CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot a completely avoidable disaster]] disaster that deconstructs just how wrong things could go with very new, very powerful superheroes who get the traditional (total lack of) training and have the relatively common PowerIncontinence problems. It'd even be the easiest time ever to invoke NothingIsTheSameAnymore and do it truthfully: after something like that it'd be reasonable for everybody to agree that the old status quo is no longer acceptable, and the disagreement would then be entirely over what should replace it. No matter who'd win, there ''would'' be changes, and you wouldn't even need to kill off any extra characters to do it.
12th Feb '17 8:42:51 PM ErikModi
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** It's also pointed out in-universe that Reed doesn't account for "the human factor" in his new math that proves the SHRA is the only way to avoid things that are even worse. Basically, Reed's new mathematics may be dead-on, but he's forgotten to factor in a huge hell of a variable that can change the whole outcome of the equation. Like if you were doing an algebra problem, and decided to just throw out the 2 because you don't believe 2s can possibly be important. X is not going to equal X.
12th Feb '17 8:33:03 PM ErikModi
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

** The "gun control" thing is an analogy in-universe, and the understanding of it here is flawed: The point of gun control isn't to restrict the gun itself, it's to restrict ''who's legally allowed to own and use it''. If you want to (legally) own a gun, you have to prove, to a certain standard, that you are capable of owning and using it responsibly. The same is true of the other analogy Civil War likes to bring up: EMTs, First Responders, and police. You have chosen to provide this service for a community, we require you to prove you are capable of performing the service to the community's satisfaction. It's the same idea for superpowers: You have this ability, we require you to prove you are capable of using it in a manner that is helpful and not harmful. The problem is that most superpowered people didn't ask for their powers, the received them accidentally. Which means that the SHRA ''should'' be about "if you have these kinds of abilities, and you want to use them in this manner, this is what you have to do to do it legally", instead of "you have superpowers, you have to give us total control of your life." Chalk that last part up to public paranoia, outrage, and the socio-political climate of the time. Cap and the Anti-Reg team's ''whole point'' was that the SHRA, as written and enforced, was basically a "superhero slavery act."
12th Feb '17 8:22:27 PM ErikModi
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:

This list shows the last 10 events of 238. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Headscratchers.CivilWar