search
new edits
liveblogs
recently new
launches
watchlist
workshops
random item
Troperville
Welcome To TV Tropes
Ask The Tropers
Forum
Trope Repair Shop
Recent Discussions
Latest Reviews
You Know, That Thing Where...
Remember That Show?
Where is that trope?
Administrivia
Just For Fun
Cut List
Contributors
Subscribing
Other Sites
Works That Need A Summary
Tools
Title Search
Trope Repair Shop
Cut List
New Edits
Edit Reasons
Recently New
Launches
Get Known
Indexes
Image Uploader
Images List
Crowner Activity
Un-typed Pages
Recent Page Type Changes
Find recent edits by troper:
go
back to: Headscratchers / Airborn
edit article
|
go to discussion page
19th Apr '12 4:21:07 PM
nameheregrrer
Send nameheregrrer a PM notification explaining the badness of
natter
:
natter-fy
Changed
line(s) 1 (click to see context)
from:
* Hyrdrium. Just how? I mean it's said to be lighter than hydrogen, which unless it's using a completely different hadron as a nucleus is just silly.
to:
* Hyrdrium. Just how? I mean it's said to be lighter than hydrogen, which unless it's using a completely different hadron as a nucleus is just silly. ** Magic. But more seriously, if the individual atoms repelled each other strongly enough (say, it somehow became and remained ionized) the gas laws would not adequately describe its behavior and it could have a lower density (not mass, but most people wouldn't recognize the distinction) than would be predicted at a given temperature and pressure.
This list shows the last 1 events of 1.
Show all.
new edits
TV Tropes
by
TV Tropes Foundation, LLC
is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from
thestaff@tvtropes.org
.
Privacy Policy