History HeadScratchers / TheGodfather

23rd May '16 8:32:37 PM costanton11
Is there an issue? Send a Message
23rd May '16 8:32:05 PM costanton11
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Clemenza has a line: "...it's a lot of bad blood. Sollozzo, Philip Tattaglia, Bruno Tattaglia; Garbone,..." Who the heck is Garbone?

to:

* Clemenza has a line: "...it's a lot of bad blood. Sollozzo, Philip Tattaglia, Bruno Tattaglia; Garbone,...Carbone,..." Who the heck is Garbone?Carbone?
18th May '16 10:17:27 AM TrollBrutal
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** The Corleones.
18th May '16 9:34:25 AM kyeo
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Who's the fifth family? In the book and the movie, we've got Strassi, Cuneo, Barzini, Tattaliga. Who's the fifth?

to:

* Who's the fifth family? In the book and the movie, we've got Strassi, Stracci, Cuneo, Barzini, Tattaliga. Who's the fifth?
18th May '16 9:33:57 AM kyeo
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Who's the fifth family? In the book and the movie, we've got Strassi, Cuneo, Barzini, Tattaliga. Who's the fifth?
14th Apr '16 6:54:13 PM costanton11
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** In the book however, Michael spared them. What caused him to do differently in the movie?
14th Apr '16 12:20:57 PM costanton11
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Why did Michael have Cuneo and Stracci killed? It made sense with Barzini and Tattalgia since they were conspiring against him, but why the other two dons?

to:

* Why did Michael have Cuneo and Stracci killed? It made sense with Barzini and Tattalgia Tattaglia since they were conspiring against him, but why the other two dons?
14th Apr '16 10:13:09 AM TrollBrutal
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** After Solozzo and [=McClusky=] are killed, ''all'' the families go to war against the Corleones, so those two have to go too, since they were part of a unified enemy. Also Michael is not seeking mere victory, but total supremacy.
14th Apr '16 9:46:57 AM costanton11
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Why did Michael have Cuneo and Stracci killed? It made sense with Barzini and Tattalgia since they were conspiring against him, but why the other two dons?
3rd Mar '16 7:29:12 AM RaiderDuck
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** To them, neutrality is not good enough, because it doesn't stop prosecution. It's implied that proactive help from the Corleones network of corruption is needed in order to make it worthy. At least the other families think they are not profiting enough from it without the network. Tataglia and Barzini are visibly annoyed, Vito's "selfish and unfriendly" gesture means they are taking too much risk and not gaining enough money. In addition, Tataglia is a pimp, greedy and easily manipulated (he's not invited to the wedding, he's a longtime foe), and Sollozzo is an upcoming player who is eager to climb-up and has contempt for the old Don, who "was slipping", so overthrowing the old order comes only natural to him, a generational thing, a literal Young Turk vs a Moustache Pete.

to:

** To them, neutrality is not good enough, because it doesn't stop prosecution. It's implied that proactive help from the Corleones Corleones' network of corruption is needed in order to make it worthy. At least the other families think they are not profiting enough from it without the network. Tataglia and Barzini are visibly annoyed, Vito's "selfish and unfriendly" gesture means they are taking too much risk and not gaining enough money. In addition, Tataglia is a pimp, greedy and easily manipulated (he's not invited to the wedding, he's a longtime foe), and Sollozzo is an upcoming player who is eager to climb-up and has contempt for the old Don, who "was slipping", so overthrowing the old order comes only natural to him, a generational thing, a literal Young Turk vs a Moustache Pete.



* Why did Michael have to shoot [=McClusky=] as well as Sollozzo? After shooting Sollozzo he could have disarmed [=McClusky=] at gunpoint and made his escape. Instead of being the prime suspect in the murder of a police captain he would have been implicated only in the shooting of an ex-con drug dealer, and this wouldn't have required over a year's risky exile in Sicily.
** If Michael does this, he has basically committed premeditated murder in front of a virtually unimpeachable eyewitness who (according to Sonny) has let his precinct know on a sign-out sheet that he will be in that exact restaurant at that exact time. Once Michael leaves [=McClusky=] could just finger him and he'd face the electric chair. This is why Sollozzo employs [=McClusky=] as a bodyguard to begin with. The double murder has the same effect in getting the police involved, but as the film shows, does allow the press to dig up [=McClusky=]'s past.

* So Michael has his goons wipe out the Dons of the other families. Whyn't they retaliate?

to:

* Why did Michael have to shoot [=McClusky=] [=McCluskey=] as well as Sollozzo? After shooting Sollozzo he could have disarmed [=McClusky=] [=McCluskey=] at gunpoint and made his escape. Instead of being the prime suspect in the murder of a police captain he would have been implicated only in the shooting of an ex-con drug dealer, and this wouldn't have required over a year's risky exile in Sicily.
** If Michael does this, he has basically committed premeditated murder in front of a virtually unimpeachable eyewitness who (according to Sonny) has let his precinct know on a sign-out sheet that he will be in that exact restaurant at that exact time. Once Michael leaves [=McClusky=] [=McCluskey=] could just finger him and he'd face the electric chair. This is why Sollozzo employs [=McClusky=] [=McCluskey=] as a bodyguard to begin with. The double murder has the same effect in getting the police involved, but as the film shows, does allow the press to dig up [=McClusky=]'s [=McCluskey=]'s past.

* So Michael has his goons wipe out the Dons of the other families. Whyn't Why didn't they retaliate?




to:

*** This grand move was also done to solidify Michael's legitimacy to power. The Winegardner sequels play this up: Unlike Sonny (who was widely viewed to be the Don's successor before his own untimely death) Michael had never even been a mafia soldier, much less run a crew or been a captain, and his becoming the Don's chosen successor raised more than a few eyebrows. Puzo mentions that Clemenza or Tessio would have been prime candidates to take over the family. It's noted in the novel that at the first meeting after the Don's death, Clemenza calls him "Mike" instead of "Michael," to say nothing of "Don" or "Godfather." After the grand move, Clemenza kisses his hand and specifically addresses him as "Don Corleone," Michael now being seen as a legitimate successor to his father.



* Ever since Puzo died back in 1999, who is (or are) the literary exectuor(s) for Puzo's canon? Because are the Mark Winegardner books and Family Corleone canon?

to:

* Ever since Puzo died back in 1999, who is (or are) the literary exectuor(s) executor(s) for Puzo's canon? Because are the Mark Winegardner books and Family Corleone canon?


Added DiffLines:

** The novel states that Vito was a very quiet child, simply because he didn't have much to say: he was an observer, not a talker. This is mentioned later when an adult Vito and Clemenza become friends as "Clemenza was a storyteller, and Vito was a listener to storytellers." In addition, the novel mentions almost in passing that young Vito was already known around the town of Corleone as an expert marksman, and that was what Don Ciccio was really afraid of: someone good with a gun who would have a grudge against him.
This list shows the last 10 events of 51. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=HeadScratchers.TheGodfather