History DethroningMoment / WebOriginal

24th Sep '17 12:23:34 AM Ferigeras
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Ferigeras: Looks like I have something to add in this folder too. Though unlike my fellow tropers above, I'm not one to be disgusted by merely any kind of CruelAndUnusualDeath the show could present, because by the show's very nature, it relies on a lot of [[CrossesTheLineTwice crossing of the line... twice]], so I don't consider even overly messy deaths to be going too far for the show's... well, "standards", as long as they stay true to the show's overly cartoonish and gory black comedy nature. (although yes, just like many others I can't stand the mere sight of The Ants due to them putting Sniffles through constant DisproportionateRetribution every time they appear). That being said, however, one episode managed to give me just such a moment that I think was horribly done: ''"Letter Late Than Never"''. The premise is admittedly a fun one: [[MooseAreIdiots Lumpy]] working as a mailman. Lumpy is actually one of my favorite characters this show has and while it's true that his frequent stupidity and even occasional antagonistic roles cause a lot of death and destruction, I think that he's a generally entertaining character to watch. With him having so many jobs yet messing up several of them in over-the-top fashion, an episode in which Lumpy works as something fairly commonplace like a mailman sounded like another Lumpy-style shenanigans about to unfold. Turns out I was proven wrong in one of the worst ways possible. And the reason for that is one single character: [[AttackOfTheKillerWhatever The Killer Turtle]]. This needs explanation: Just as Lumpy delivers his first mail in the episode, he discovers a doghouse with a skull sign on it, naturally fearing what would come out of it. But once it turns out to be the aforementioned turtle, Lumpy first laughs it off and then pats the turtle on the head, after which het gets his finger severely bitten. And then right afterwards, Lumpy gets mauled by the turtle, in slow and gruesome manner. But that's just the beginning, because it turns out the turtle is out to chase down Lumpy, as it appears a second time not too long after the first scene. Lumpy tries using a can of dog repellent on the turtle, but ends up spraying his own eyes by accident. He then can't see the turtle approaching him and by the time he spots it, he already gets severely mauled for the second time. Then it all comes to a head in the episode's last few minutes, where Lumpy has to climb up a mountain to reach a house he can deliver his next mail to. And this is the part that I very much consider my DMoS for this show: Just as Lumpy exhaustedly reaches the mountain's top, that damned turtle suddenly appears infront of the house Lumpy just reached through what can only be explained by OffscreenTeleportation, after which Lumpy steps back out of fear and accidentally slips off the edge. Lumpy then falls all the way from the mountain to come crashing down to the ground, which shockingly didn't kill him. What instead follows is a slow and unbearable death scene easily comparable to Sniffles' death that's already been talked about above. Immediately after Lumpy ends up an immobile and bloody mess, through OffscreenTeleportation (''again'') the turtle immediately appears next to Lumpy, whom it now begins pulling to it while eating him whole, with the poor moose unable to defend himself whatsoever. He desperately tries reaching for the dog repellant with his antler, only for it to be spray on his eyes... ''again''. The episode ends with Lumpy eaten alive with the very last shot being of the turtle spitting out one of his antlers... oh, and burping of course. By now you may have noticed what makes this episode so bad to me: Instead of another crazy episode with Lumpy accidentally causing lots of chaos to happen, there's actually relatively little in the way of death happening to other characters by his mistakes (only two characters die and the first death only occurs about 5 minutes in, in a 7-Minute long episode), instead subjecting Lumpy (and the viewer) to possibly the slowest, dullest and most un-cartoonish pain a single episode could ever cram in, all that caused by a [[PrecisionFStrike fucking]] turtle that only exists to slow down the episode to a crawl. Sniffles still objectively had the worse death in "''Tongue in Cheek''", but I think Lumpy slowly getting devoured while he is unable to do anything about it just after barely surviving a deadly fall from a mountain on top of already having suffered severe maulings before is just hard to watch. There's the usual over-the-top gore the show usually goes with and then there's spending most of 7 minutes on pain that is unwatchable. [[DisproportionateRetribution Really, Lumpy didn't deserve it at all]].

to:

* Ferigeras: Looks like Before I have something to add in this folder too. Though unlike my fellow tropers above, begin, I'm not one to be disgusted by merely any kind of CruelAndUnusualDeath the this show could present, because by the show's very nature, it relies on a lot of [[CrossesTheLineTwice crossing of the line... twice]], twice]] and I always acknowledged it as such, so unlike my fellow tropers above I don't consider even overly messy deaths to be going too far for the show's... well, "standards", as long as they stay true to the show's overly cartoonish and gory black comedy nature. nature (although yes, just like many others I can't stand the mere sight of The Ants due to them putting Sniffles through constant DisproportionateRetribution every time they appear). That being said, however, one episode managed to give me just such a moment that I think was horribly done: ''"Letter Late Than Never"''. The premise is admittedly a fun one: [[MooseAreIdiots Lumpy]] working as a mailman. Lumpy is actually one of my favorite characters this show has and while it's true that his frequent stupidity and even occasional antagonistic roles cause a lot of death and destruction, I think that he's a generally entertaining character to watch. watch and he isn't even really safe from this show's LaserGuidedKarma either. With him having so many jobs yet messing up several of them in over-the-top fashion, an episode in which Lumpy works as something fairly commonplace like a mailman sounded like another this, just your usual Lumpy-style shenanigans about to unfold. episode. Turns out I was proven wrong in one of the worst ways way possible. And the reason for that is one single character: [[AttackOfTheKillerWhatever The Killer Turtle]]. This needs explanation: Just as Lumpy delivers his first mail in the episode, he discovers a doghouse with a skull sign on it, naturally fearing what would come out of it. But once it turns out to be the aforementioned turtle, Lumpy first laughs it off and then pats the turtle on the head, after which het gets his finger severely violently bitten. And then right afterwards, Lumpy gets then tries to run away but keeps tripping on one random object after another until he eventually reaches his car, where he is then mauled by the turtle, in slow and gruesome manner. But that's just the beginning, because it turns out the turtle is out to chase down Lumpy, as it appears a second time not too long after the first scene. This time, Lumpy tries using a can of dog repellent on the turtle, but ends up spraying his own eyes by accident. He then can't see the turtle approaching him and by the time he spots it, he already gets severely mauled for the second time. Then it all comes to a head in the episode's last few minutes, where Lumpy has to climb up a mountain to reach a house he can deliver his next mail to. And this is the part that I very much consider my DMoS for of this show: Just as Lumpy exhaustedly reaches the mountain's top, that damned turtle suddenly appears infront of the house Lumpy just reached through what can only be explained by OffscreenTeleportation, after which Lumpy steps back out of fear and accidentally slips off the edge. Lumpy then falls all the way from the mountain to come crashing down to the ground, which shockingly didn't kill him. What instead follows happens to him is a slow and unbearable death scene easily comparable to Sniffles' death that's already been talked about above. Immediately after Lumpy ends up an immobile and bloody mess, mess after the fall, through OffscreenTeleportation (''again'') the turtle immediately appears next to Lumpy, whom it now begins pulling to it while eating him whole, with the poor moose unable to defend himself whatsoever. He desperately tries reaching for the nearby dog repellant with his antler, only for it to be spray on his eyes... ''again''. The episode ends with Lumpy eaten alive with the very last shot being of the turtle spitting out one of his antlers... oh, and burping of course. By now you may have noticed To sum up what makes this episode so bad to me: Instead of another crazy Lumpy episode with Lumpy accidentally him causing lots of chaos to happen, there's actually relatively little in the way of death and injury happening to other characters by his mistakes or basically anything else for that matter (only two characters die by him through complete accident and the first death only occurs about 5 minutes in, in a 7-Minute long episode), instead subjecting Lumpy (and the viewer) to possibly the slowest, dullest and most un-cartoonish pain a single episode could ever cram in, all that caused by a [[PrecisionFStrike fucking]] slow-ass turtle that (funnily enough) only exists to slow down the episode to a crawl. painful crawl whenever it shows up, but it's the last bit that really makes this episode my least favorite in the TV series. Sniffles still objectively had the worse death in "''Tongue in Cheek''", but I think watching Lumpy slowly getting devoured while he is unable to do anything about it just after barely surviving a deadly fall from a mountain on top of already having suffered severe maulings before is just hard to watch. feels like a chore. There's the usual over-the-top black comedy gore and chaos the show usually goes with and then there's spending most of 7 minutes too much time on pain that is unwatchable. [[DisproportionateRetribution Really, Lumpy didn't deserve it at all]].frustratingly dull and drawn-out suffering. This easily falls into the latter.
23rd Sep '17 3:40:47 PM Ferigeras
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Ferigeras: Looks like I have something to add in this folder too. Though unlike my fellow tropers above, I'm not one to be disgusted by merely any kind of CruelAndUnusualDeath the show could present, because by the show's very nature, it relies on a lot of [[CrossesTheLineTwice crossing of the line... twice]], so I don't consider even overly messy deaths to be going too far for the show's... well, "standards", as long as they stay true to the show's overly cartoonish and gory black comedy nature. (although yes, just like many others I can't stand the mere sight of The Ants due to them putting Sniffles through constant DisproportionateRetribution every time they appear). That being said, however, one episode managed to give me just such a moment that I think was horribly done: ''"Letter Late Than Never"''. The premise is admittedly a fun one: [[MooseAreIdiots Lumpy]] working as a mailman. Lumpy is actually one of my favorite characters this show has and while it's true that his frequent stupidity and even occasional antagonistic roles cause a lot of death and destruction, I think that he's a generally entertaining character to watch. With him having so many jobs yet messing up several of them in over-the-top fashion, an episode in which Lumpy works as something fairly commonplace like a mailman sounded like another Lumpy-style shenanigans about to unfold. Turns out I was proven wrong in one of the worst ways possible. And the reason for that is one single character: [[AttackOfTheKillerWhatever The Killer Turtle]]. This needs explanation: Just as Lumpy delivers his first mail in the episode, he discovers a doghouse with a skull sign on it, naturally fearing what would come out of it. But once it turns out to be the aforementioned turtle, Lumpy first laughs it off and then pats the turtle on the head, after which het gets his finger severely bitten. And then right afterwards, Lumpy gets mauled by the turtle, in slow and gruesome manner. But that's just the beginning, because it turns out the turtle is out to chase down Lumpy, as it appears a second time not too long after the first scene. Lumpy tries using a can of dog repellent on the turtle, but ends up spraying his own eyes by accident. He then can't see the turtle approaching him and by the time he spots it, he already gets severely mauled for the second time. Then it all comes to a head in the episode's last few minutes, where Lumpy has to climb up a mountain to reach a house he can deliver his next mail to. And this is the part that I very much consider my DMoS for this show: Just as Lumpy exhaustedly reaches the mountain's top, that damned turtle suddenly appears infront of the house Lumpy just reached through what can only be explained by OffscreenTeleportation, after which Lumpy steps back out of fear and accidentally slips off the edge. Lumpy then falls all the way from the mountain to come crashing down to the ground, which shockingly didn't kill him. What instead follows is a slow and unbearable death scene easily comparable to Sniffles' death that's already been talked about above. Immediately after Lumpy ends up an immobile and bloody mess, through OffscreenTeleportation (''again'') the turtle immediately appears next to Lumpy, whom it now begins pulling to it while eating him whole, with the poor moose unable to defend himself whatsoever. He desperately tries reaching for the dog repellant with his antler, only for it to be spray on his eyes... ''again''. The episode ends with Lumpy eaten alive with the very last shot being of the turtle spitting out one of his antlers... oh, and burping of course. By now you may have noticed what makes this episode so bad to me: Instead of another crazy episode with Lumpy accidentally causing lots of chaos to happen, there's actually relatively little in the way of death happening to other characters by his mistakes (only two characters die and the first death only occurs about 5 minutes in, in a 7-Minute long episode), instead subjecting Lumpy (and the viewer) to possibly the slowest, dullest and most un-cartoonish pain a single episode could ever cram in, all that caused by a [[PrecisionFStrike fucking]] turtle that only exists to slow down the episode to a crawl. Sniffles still objectively had the worse death in "''Tongue in Cheek''", but I think Lumpy slowly getting devoured while he is unable to do anything about it just after barely surviving a deadly fall from a mountain on top of already having suffered severe maulings before is just hard to watch. There's the usual over-the-top gore the show usually goes with and then there's spending most of 7 minutes on pain that is unwatchable. [[DisproportionateRetribution Really, Lumpy didn't deserve it at all]].
22nd Sep '17 11:12:56 AM Awesomekid42
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** GreenFablesInverness: And come season four this show has not gotten any better in its treatment of its characters. While it’s meant to be a throwaway joke, Ruby laughing at Juane’s bunny hoodie is frankly insulting to my intelligence because it is a regression of character development the past few seasons have worked so hard to deconstruct the traditional but toxic stereotyping. One, Juane’s masculinity, or rather lack thereof, is the butt monkey yet again when a key part of his S1 character arc was getting away from poisonous macho man mindset. It’s what almost got him killed against Grimm biting off more than he could chew. And who help him confront his weakness and move on towards self-improvement? Oh yeah, Pyrrha, the girl he cared for and lost and we see a moment later used his memento of her being integrated into his weapon’s shield so a piece of her spirit will remain fighting alongside Team JNRP. The girl who accepted Juane for who he was and was everything she wanted in life; somebody that didn’t put her on a pedestal instead treating her like a real person. As if laughing at Juane wasn’t bad enough, Ruby laughing at the cereal icon is even worse because it’s a brown bunny and who else is a brown bunny? Fan favorite Velvet Scarlatina! The girl who had to fight tooth and nail to prove despite her cute looks she was as lethal as any other huntress. Her weapon is a fusion of every kickass weapon we’ve seen Beacon’s students use. She copies their fighting style into her own combat tactics to take on a horde of Grimm like the badass she is. That her weapon was Monty’s favorite. Remember the faunus girl who got picked on in season 1 by Cardin and his team for her bunny ears to demonstrate what kind of jerks they were and the discrimination faunus face? Yeah, the same group of bullies that would go on to antagonize and blackmail Juane! Yeah, they can make the excuse the deaths of Pyrrha and Penny were “planned from the start to demonstrate no one in safe in the world of Remnant” until they’re blue but this is just mounting evidence that RT doesn’t make an effort to respect their characters, the audience’s intelligence, or even their own writing integrity.
9th Sep '17 4:53:49 PM Starshock
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Starshock: The article "Everything I Love Is Problematic" from the Mary Sue is not a bad article. The main message is that while it's okay to enjoy works of fiction that contain ValuesDissonance or UnfortunateImplications, it's also good to criticize the shortcomings of those works and of their creators. That's a good message. That's not what I object to. What I object to is this sentence, and more importantly, the philosophical belief it implies "Creator/BillCosby, Creator/HPLovecraft, and Creator/MarionZimmerBradley were not good people." Why is Lovecraft problematic? [[ValuesDissonance He was racist and his racism had an aggravating tendency of bleeding over into his writing]]. Fair enough. Why are Cosby and Bradley problematic? Because they are accused of [[RapeIsASpecialKindOfEvil rape]] and [[WouldHurtAChild child abuse]], respectively. It seems like it should be impossible for Lovecraft's repugnant and ridiculous racism to be the "jaywalking" in an ArsonMurderAndJaywalking scenario, yet this article manages to pull it off. Holding racist beliefs is wrong, and I really hope I don't need to tell you that. But I also hope that I don't need to tell you that holding racist beliefs, awful as those beliefs are, is not morally equivalent to rape or child abuse. Yet by lumping together Cosby, Lovecraft, and Zimmer under the same catagory of "not good people", this article implies just that. The article never goes on to clarify its point, leaving us with the unchallenged assumption that [[AllCrimesAreEqual all moral failings are equal]]. That's a philosophical belief that is, dare I say it, problematic.
4th Sep '17 1:01:00 PM HalcyonDayz
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Vexer: Normally I love the EC guys, but sometimes they can really go off the deep end(I.E. their videos about "Hatred" and "Call of Juarez: The Cartel"), but by far their absolute worst episode bar none would have to be "The Division: Problematic Meaning in Mechanics" which is the worst case of CriticalResearchFailure and PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad that i've ever seen. It's abundantly clear that the EC guys only played the game for a couple of hours, as they claim the game is about gunning down innocent civilians, which is a blatant lie as all the NPCs you have to kill are hostile to you from the start and all belong to violent gangs which kill and terrorize innocent people. They also assume that the game is "racist" cause the enemies wear hoodies, they apparently did not take into consideration that the game was made by a Swedish developer, so it's very likely they did not realize that people would misinterpret it. The EC guys also painfully try and make a case about how the game is supporting Totalitarianism, which it clearly is not since society itself has collapsed, also their points about being "judge jury and executioner" fall flat considering New York is under martial law, which means due process is suspended. I could go on and on about how many errors that video has, but my overall point is that the EC guys were letting emotion overtake logic and completely failing to do any actual research on the game itself, and in the past EC were good about responding to criticism from people about their videos, but not anymore it seems, as they never apologized for the inaccuracies in this video or the ones in the "Cartel" and "Hatred" episodes.

to:

* Vexer: Normally I love the EC guys, but sometimes they can really go off the deep end(I.E. their videos about "Hatred" and "Call of Juarez: The Cartel"), but by far their absolute worst episode bar none would have to be "The Division: Problematic Meaning in Mechanics" which is the worst case of CriticalResearchFailure and PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad that i've ever seen. It's abundantly clear that the EC guys only played the game for a couple of hours, as they claim the game is about gunning down innocent civilians, which is a blatant lie as all the NPCs {{Non Player Character}}s you have to kill are hostile to you from the start and all belong to violent gangs which kill and terrorize innocent people. They also assume that the game is "racist" cause the enemies wear hoodies, they apparently did not take into consideration that the game was made by a Swedish developer, so it's very likely they did not realize that people would misinterpret it. The EC guys also painfully try and make a case about how the game is supporting Totalitarianism, which it clearly is not since society itself has collapsed, also their points about being "judge jury and executioner" fall flat considering New York is under martial law, which means due process is suspended. I could go on and on about how many errors that video has, but my overall point is that the EC guys were letting emotion overtake logic and completely failing to do any actual research on the game itself, and in the past EC were good about responding to criticism from people about their videos, but not anymore it seems, as they never apologized for the inaccuracies in this video or the ones in the "Cartel" and "Hatred" episodes.
3rd Sep '17 8:44:34 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


As well liked as he is, WebVideo/SuperMarioLogan still has some moments we hate more than Jeffy [[DoesNotLikeSpam hates green beans]].

to:

As well liked as he is, WebVideo/SuperMarioLogan still has some moments is, sometimes he produces [[DarthWiki/DethroningMomentOfSuck moments]] we hate more than Jeffy [[DoesNotLikeSpam hates green beans]].
2nd Sep '17 2:35:25 PM HalcyonDayz
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** shonengirl: Seconded. This was my first exposure to Egoraptor, and it wasn't a good one. What annoyed me throughout the whole video was that not only did he have to be an extreme JerkAss about his views, but had such a blatant BiasSteamroller it was infuriating, despite claiming at the start of the review that he was going to be "objective", making it seem like his opinion is objective fact. He talked as if the first Zelda was this perfect, flawless game fit for everyone, declaring that was what Zelda games "should" be. Yet he wasn't as harsh toward ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaALinkToThePast Link to the Past]]'' despite being arguably more linear than Skyward Sword would ever be. He blamed OoT fanboys for being nostalgia-blind when he is probably worse when it comes to the original, and refuses to accept that some people might actually like a more user-friendly style of gameplay and like, you know, an actual plot and character development. The aforementioned rant was where it all culminated, at the same time he was at his most obnoxious, meanspirited and most irrelevant, showing all his hypocrisy, ItsAllAboutMe mentality, and weak arguments before this point (which mostly boiled down to TheyChangedItNowItSucks) building up in this giant mess of an AuthorFilibuster. I haven't played a Zelda game before and still he just ticked me off through the whole thing. The last comment at the end did nothing to negate how immature he had been in presenting his arguments, and I believe he is no better than that fanboy at the start of his video. He is just like those Genwunners who declare anything not Gen one of Pokemon bad. He is just as bad as those Sonic fanbrats who complain about the smallest detail. He is no better than any other raging nostalgia-blind fanboy who [[ItsAllAboutMe thinks everything should be done how he wants it]]. It's fine he is presenting his opinions, I get that. But he didn't have to be so darn obnoxious and hypocritical about it. It just makes me wonder how this manchild became so popular. (Then again, considering hardcore gamers, maybe I shouldn't be surprised)

to:

** shonengirl: Seconded. This was my first exposure to Egoraptor, and it wasn't a good one. What annoyed me throughout the whole video was that not only did he have to be an extreme JerkAss about his views, but had such a blatant BiasSteamroller it was infuriating, despite claiming at the start of the review that he was going to be "objective", making it seem like his opinion is objective fact. He talked as if the first Zelda was this perfect, flawless game fit for everyone, declaring that was what Zelda games "should" be. Yet he wasn't as harsh toward ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaALinkToThePast Link to the Past]]'' despite being arguably more linear than Skyward Sword would ever be. He blamed OoT ''VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaOcarinaOfTime'' fanboys for being nostalgia-blind when he is probably worse when it comes to the original, and refuses to accept that some people might actually like a more user-friendly style of gameplay and like, you know, an actual plot and character development. The aforementioned rant was where it all culminated, at the same time he was at his most obnoxious, meanspirited and most irrelevant, showing all his hypocrisy, ItsAllAboutMe mentality, and weak arguments before this point (which mostly boiled down to TheyChangedItNowItSucks) building up in this giant mess of an AuthorFilibuster. I haven't played a Zelda game before and still he just ticked me off through the whole thing. The last comment at the end did nothing to negate how immature he had been in presenting his arguments, and I believe he is no better than that fanboy at the start of his video. He is just like those Genwunners who declare anything not Gen one of Pokemon bad. He is just as bad as those Sonic fanbrats who complain about the smallest detail. He is no better than any other raging nostalgia-blind fanboy who [[ItsAllAboutMe thinks everything should be done how he wants it]]. It's fine he is presenting his opinions, I get that. But he didn't have to be so darn obnoxious and hypocritical about it. It just makes me wonder how this manchild became so popular. (Then again, considering hardcore gamers, maybe I shouldn't be surprised)
1st Sep '17 4:30:02 AM TomPhanto
Is there an issue? Send a Message


As well liked as he is, WebVideo/SuperMarioLogan still has some moments we hate more than Jeffy [[DoesNotLikeSpam hates peas]].

to:

As well liked as he is, WebVideo/SuperMarioLogan still has some moments we hate more than Jeffy [[DoesNotLikeSpam hates peas]].green beans]].
29th Aug '17 3:43:05 PM InsertCleverNameHere
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/InsertCleverNameHere: ''Top 5 Unknowns'' has jumped the shark with [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mue3iWNeZnM this]] list of statues caught moving on camera. You know it's terrible when much of the footage is so small you can't even see the statues moving, but the worst part of the video was at number 4; the guy literally just showed clips of people in Jesus costumes. Seriously, ''Top 5 Unknowns''? Were you even trying when you made this list?
28th Aug '17 1:22:26 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: I've never watched these, but the "X tells Y (a villain) Something" videos are just awful, because they scream of DidYouJustFlipOffCthulhu (and sometimes, BlackAndBlackMorality), and [[TropesAreTools NOT in a good way]]. We've had such monstrosities as "[[Disney/TheAristocats Roquefort]] tells [[Disney/AliceInWonderland the Queen of Hearts]] to be quiet", "[[Disney/AGoofyMovie Max]] tells [[Disney/{{Pocahontas}} Governor Ratcliffe]] to get his own life" and [[WesternAnimation/TheFairlyOddParents Vicky]] telling [[Disney/RobinHood Prince John]] BED TWERP (the last one's particularly dumb, as the one who addresses Prince John is as bad as him, if not worse). However, none of these were the motive for this entry. Nope, it was the video "Tommy and Tallulah (I don't know where are they from, but they are freaking ''kids'') tell Prince John to stop and tell him off". I fail to see any logic behind those characters giving the villains a TheReasonYouSuckSpeech. It's a failed attempt at making a MomentOfAwesome that beginned with someone making this kind of video and others hopping on the bandwagon.



** Tropers/TommyTiger: Oh yes, I agree with you. Not only are they bad, they're as original as anything The Copycats from ''WesternAnimation/TheAmazingWorldOfGumball'' did. The "X tells Y (a villain) Something" videos are the worst, because they scream of DidYouJustFlipOffCthulhu (and sometimes, BlackAndBlackMorality), and [[TropesAreTools NOT in a good way]]. We've had such monstrosities as "[[Disney/TheAristocats Roquefort]] tells [[Disney/AliceInWonderland the Queen of Hearts]] to be quiet", "[[Disney/AGoofyMovie Max]] tells [[Disney/{{Pocahontas}} Governor Ratcliffe]] to get his own life" and [[WesternAnimation/TheFairlyOddParents Vicky]] telling [[Disney/RobinHood Prince John]] BED TWERP (the last one's particularly dumb, as the one who addresses Prince John is as bad as him, if not worse). However, none of these were the motive for this entry. Nope, it was the video "Tommy and Tallulah (I don't know where are they from, but they are freaking ''kids'') tell Prince John to stop and tell him off". I fail to see any logic behind those characters giving the villains a TheReasonYouSuckSpeech. It's a failed attempt at making a MomentOfAwesome that beginned with someone making this kind of video and others hopping on the bandwagon.
19th Aug '17 10:21:12 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of ''WebAnimation/HappyTreeFriends'', but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, surely in the top 5. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the final nail on HTF's coffin for me), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, Flippy in my opinion is nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all, and gives other bears (both fictional and real) a bad name. After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! And it was one of the first times I wanted to strangle a fictional character. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.

to:

** * Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of ''WebAnimation/HappyTreeFriends'', but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, surely in the top 5. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the final nail on HTF's coffin for me), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, Flippy in my opinion is nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all, and gives other bears (both fictional and real) a bad name. After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! And it was one of the first times I wanted to strangle a fictional character. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.



** MetaMaster54610: You'd think Logan would have learned his lesson from the fiasco Jeffy's Bad Word caused. He knew full well how loathed that video was, so you'd think he'd know better than to create Jeffy's Bad Word 2.0 in the form of 'Locked Out'. The plot of the video is that Mario is trying to get Jeffy to eat his peas, promising him chocolate cake if he eats his peas. Rather than eating his peas, Jeffy pours them onto his high chair seat and tries to lie to Mario about it. When Mario rightfully denies him chocolate cake for not actually eating his dinner, Jeffy throws a tantrum. Admittedly, it was a dick move to have Mario eat a piece of chocolate cake in front of Jeffy, but what happens next is disproportionate retribution at its finest. Jeffy tricks Mario into going outside, then locks him out so he can steal the cake. He locks all the doors and traps Mario outside. In this video, Jeffy clearly has malicious intent, and knows ''exactly'' what he's doing. Mario is locked outside in the cold, trying everything he can to get back inside. And then the Brooklyn Guy shows up, and when he shows up in a Jeffy video, you immediately know Mario is in for a bad time. The Brooklyn Officer thinks that Mario is trying to break into the house, and when he talks to Jeffy about it, the little bastard lies and says he's never seen Mario before in his life. Of course the Brooklyn Guy takes Jeffy's word over Mario's and threatens to arrest him if he ever goes near his ''own house'' again. Mario is rightfully ''pissed'' at this point, mumbling threats to assault and murder Jeffy, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him for wanting revenge. He tries to get inside through the air vents, and ends up crashing down on the floor, seemingly unconscious. Jeffy sees Mario lying on the floor, and, infuriatingly, grabs him and ''literally throws him back outside without a word''. Eventually, Mario ''begs'' Jeffy to just let him inside, which Jeffy refuses to do unless Mario gets him more chocolate cake. So Mario does get another chocolate cake... Which Mario hides in so that he can get inside. When Mario pops out of the cake, he chases Jeffy in a rage... And gets locked out ''again''. And of ''course'' it ends with him getting arrested and Jeffy getting off scott-free for his actions, because Logan ''refuses'' to freaking ''punish'' this kid for the awful things he does. This is honestly the video that cemented my absolute ''loathing'' of Jeffy as a character. He's nothing more than a braindead, unfunny little sociopath that exists for the sole purpose of making Mario's life a complete and utter nightmare, and he's ''well aware'' of that fact. I am very disappointed in Logan. I thought he would have known better after the last time he made a video where Mario was unfairly tormented because of Jeffy...

to:

** * MetaMaster54610: You'd think Logan would have learned his lesson from the fiasco Jeffy's Bad Word caused. He knew full well how loathed that video was, so you'd think he'd know better than to create Jeffy's Bad Word 2.0 in the form of 'Locked Out'. The plot of the video is that Mario is trying to get Jeffy to eat his peas, promising him chocolate cake if he eats his peas. Rather than eating his peas, Jeffy pours them onto his high chair seat and tries to lie to Mario about it. When Mario rightfully denies him chocolate cake for not actually eating his dinner, Jeffy throws a tantrum. Admittedly, it was a dick move to have Mario eat a piece of chocolate cake in front of Jeffy, but what happens next is disproportionate retribution at its finest. Jeffy tricks Mario into going outside, then locks him out so he can steal the cake. He locks all the doors and traps Mario outside. In this video, Jeffy clearly has malicious intent, and knows ''exactly'' what he's doing. Mario is locked outside in the cold, trying everything he can to get back inside. And then the Brooklyn Guy shows up, and when he shows up in a Jeffy video, you immediately know Mario is in for a bad time. The Brooklyn Officer thinks that Mario is trying to break into the house, and when he talks to Jeffy about it, the little bastard lies and says he's never seen Mario before in his life. Of course the Brooklyn Guy takes Jeffy's word over Mario's and threatens to arrest him if he ever goes near his ''own house'' again. Mario is rightfully ''pissed'' at this point, mumbling threats to assault and murder Jeffy, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him for wanting revenge. He tries to get inside through the air vents, and ends up crashing down on the floor, seemingly unconscious. Jeffy sees Mario lying on the floor, and, infuriatingly, grabs him and ''literally throws him back outside without a word''. Eventually, Mario ''begs'' Jeffy to just let him inside, which Jeffy refuses to do unless Mario gets him more chocolate cake. So Mario does get another chocolate cake... Which Mario hides in so that he can get inside. When Mario pops out of the cake, he chases Jeffy in a rage... And gets locked out ''again''. And of ''course'' it ends with him getting arrested and Jeffy getting off scott-free for his actions, because Logan ''refuses'' to freaking ''punish'' this kid for the awful things he does. This is honestly the video that cemented my absolute ''loathing'' of Jeffy as a character. He's nothing more than a braindead, unfunny little sociopath that exists for the sole purpose of making Mario's life a complete and utter nightmare, and he's ''well aware'' of that fact. I am very disappointed in Logan. I thought he would have known better after the last time he made a video where Mario was unfairly tormented because of Jeffy...
17th Aug '17 9:27:33 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[folder:Happy Tree Friends]]
''WebAnimation/HappyTreeFriends'' is (in)famous for [[RefugeInAudacity being so gory]] [[CrossesTheLineTwice it's funny]]. Sometimes though, they [[DudeNotFunny put less emphasis on the latter]], and the results are moments we wish [[AxCrazy Fliqpy]] would kill.
* Tropers/MelancholyUtopia: I'm a former fan of ''WebAnimation/HappyTreeFriends'', but even back when I liked it I couldn't stand the episode "Tongue in Cheek". The thing I often give HTF credit for is that most deaths are so absurd and logic-defying it's difficult to get offended; that most deaths are quick and painless, and if they're not, it's either not dragged on for too long or the characters aren't shown suffering too much. I can't say the same for this episode. Sniffles was never my favourite character, but this episode just took everything too far. To sum this abomination up, he invents a helmet that mind controls the holder, but surprise surprise, his arch enemies, the dreaded ants, get a hold of it and use it on him. What follows is truly brutal even for HTF standards; they force him to eat an apple with razor blades on it and use a propeller to pull his organs out of his snout. Did I mention that during all this time, he screams and cries in agony like it isn't acting? Then in the end, they use his corpse as their new home. This episode convinces me that there are lines that shouldn't ever be crossed, even for a show relying solely on gory humor. I only watched this episode once, and never plan to see it again.
** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of ''WebAnimation/HappyTreeFriends'', but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, surely in the top 5. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the final nail on HTF's coffin for me), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, Flippy in my opinion is nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all, and gives other bears (both fictional and real) a bad name. After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! And it was one of the first times I wanted to strangle a fictional character. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.
[[/folder]]



[[folder:SuperMarioLogan]]
As well liked as he is, WebVideo/SuperMarioLogan still has some moments we hate more than Jeffy [[DoesNotLikeSpam hates peas]].
* [=TomPhanto=]: As much as I enjoy the plush videos of WebVideo/SuperMarioLogan, I did not like "Jeffy's Bad Word!" at all. It's about Jeffy, a mentally handicapped kid who was dumped on Mario's doorstep in "Mario The Babysitter!" and has now become one of the most recurring characters, second only to Bowser Jr. I personally dislike Jeffy episodes because most of them are just making [[OnlySaneMan Mario]] a CosmicPlaything. The episode starts off with Mario driving to Walmart and he yells at a homeless guy that gets in his way, accidentally calling him a "faggot". Jeffy then starts saying it because he likes the word. And as expected, the episode is about Mario getting into trouble because Jeffy won't stop saying "faggot". What makes this a [=DMoS=] for me is what happens at the end. Mario gives Jeffy a spanking because he wouldn't stop saying "faggot". Mario is arrested, [[WronglyAccused accused of child molestation]], and is registered as a felon and sex offender, all just for trying to discipline Jeffy. I know Mario's supposed to be a ButtMonkey in this show, but I felt the episode went [[DudeNotFunny way too far]] with the abuse.
** MetaMaster54610: You'd think Logan would have learned his lesson from the fiasco Jeffy's Bad Word caused. He knew full well how loathed that video was, so you'd think he'd know better than to create Jeffy's Bad Word 2.0 in the form of 'Locked Out'. The plot of the video is that Mario is trying to get Jeffy to eat his peas, promising him chocolate cake if he eats his peas. Rather than eating his peas, Jeffy pours them onto his high chair seat and tries to lie to Mario about it. When Mario rightfully denies him chocolate cake for not actually eating his dinner, Jeffy throws a tantrum. Admittedly, it was a dick move to have Mario eat a piece of chocolate cake in front of Jeffy, but what happens next is disproportionate retribution at its finest. Jeffy tricks Mario into going outside, then locks him out so he can steal the cake. He locks all the doors and traps Mario outside. In this video, Jeffy clearly has malicious intent, and knows ''exactly'' what he's doing. Mario is locked outside in the cold, trying everything he can to get back inside. And then the Brooklyn Guy shows up, and when he shows up in a Jeffy video, you immediately know Mario is in for a bad time. The Brooklyn Officer thinks that Mario is trying to break into the house, and when he talks to Jeffy about it, the little bastard lies and says he's never seen Mario before in his life. Of course the Brooklyn Guy takes Jeffy's word over Mario's and threatens to arrest him if he ever goes near his ''own house'' again. Mario is rightfully ''pissed'' at this point, mumbling threats to assault and murder Jeffy, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him for wanting revenge. He tries to get inside through the air vents, and ends up crashing down on the floor, seemingly unconscious. Jeffy sees Mario lying on the floor, and, infuriatingly, grabs him and ''literally throws him back outside without a word''. Eventually, Mario ''begs'' Jeffy to just let him inside, which Jeffy refuses to do unless Mario gets him more chocolate cake. So Mario does get another chocolate cake... Which Mario hides in so that he can get inside. When Mario pops out of the cake, he chases Jeffy in a rage... And gets locked out ''again''. And of ''course'' it ends with him getting arrested and Jeffy getting off scott-free for his actions, because Logan ''refuses'' to freaking ''punish'' this kid for the awful things he does. This is honestly the video that cemented my absolute ''loathing'' of Jeffy as a character. He's nothing more than a braindead, unfunny little sociopath that exists for the sole purpose of making Mario's life a complete and utter nightmare, and he's ''well aware'' of that fact. I am very disappointed in Logan. I thought he would have known better after the last time he made a video where Mario was unfairly tormented because of Jeffy...
[[/folder]]



* Tropers/MelancholyUtopia: I'm a former fan of ''WebAnimation/HappyTreeFriends'', but even back when I liked it I couldn't stand the episode "Tongue in Cheek". The thing I often give HTF credit for is that most deaths are so absurd and logic-defying it's difficult to get offended; that most deaths are quick and painless, and if they're not, it's either not dragged on for too long or the characters aren't shown suffering too much. I can't say the same for this episode. Sniffles was never my favourite character, but this episode just took everything too far. To sum this abomination up, he invents a helmet that mind controls the holder, but surprise surprise, his arch enemies, the dreaded ants, get a hold of it and use it on him. What follows is truly brutal even for HTF standards; they force him to eat an apple with razor blades on it and use a propeller to pull his organs out of his snout. Did I mention that during all this time, he screams and cries in agony like it isn't acting? Then in the end, they use his corpse as their new home. This episode convinces me that there are lines that shouldn't ever be crossed, even for a show relying solely on gory humor. I only watched this episode once, and never plan to see it again.
** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, surely in the top 5. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the final nail on HTF's coffin for me), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, Flippy in my opinion is nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all, and gives other bears (both fictional and real) a bad name. After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! And it was one of the first times I wanted to strangle a fictional character. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.



* [=TomPhanto=]: As much as I enjoy the plush videos of WebVideo/SuperMarioLogan, I did not like "Jeffy's Bad Word!" at all. It's about Jeffy, a mentally handicapped kid who was dumped on Mario's doorstep in "Mario The Babysitter!" and has now become one of the most recurring characters, second only to Bowser Jr. I personally dislike Jeffy episodes because most of them are just making [[OnlySaneMan Mario]] a CosmicPlaything. The episode starts off with Mario driving to Walmart and he yells at a homeless guy that gets in his way, accidentally calling him a "faggot". Jeffy then starts saying it because he likes the word. And as expected, the episode is about Mario getting into trouble because Jeffy won't stop saying "faggot". What makes this a [=DMoS=] for me is what happens at the end. Mario gives Jeffy a spanking because he wouldn't stop saying "faggot". Mario is arrested, [[WronglyAccused accused of child molestation]], and is registered as a felon and sex offender, all just for trying to discipline Jeffy. I know Mario's supposed to be a ButtMonkey in this show, but I felt the episode went [[DudeNotFunny way too far]] with the abuse.
** MetaMaster54610: You'd think Logan would have learned his lesson from the fiasco Jeffy's Bad Word caused. He knew full well how loathed that video was, so you'd think he'd know better than to create Jeffy's Bad Word 2.0 in the form of 'Locked Out'. The plot of the video is that Mario is trying to get Jeffy to eat his peas, promising him chocolate cake if he eats his peas. Rather than eating his peas, Jeffy pours them onto his high chair seat and tries to lie to Mario about it. When Mario rightfully denies him chocolate cake for not actually eating his dinner, Jeffy throws a tantrum. Admittedly, it was a dick move to have Mario eat a piece of chocolate cake in front of Jeffy, but what happens next is disproportionate retribution at its finest. Jeffy tricks Mario into going outside, then locks him out so he can steal the cake. He locks all the doors and traps Mario outside. In this video, Jeffy clearly has malicious intent, and knows ''exactly'' what he's doing. Mario is locked outside in the cold, trying everything he can to get back inside. And then the Brooklyn Guy shows up, and when he shows up in a Jeffy video, you immediately know Mario is in for a bad time. The Brooklyn Officer thinks that Mario is trying to break into the house, and when he talks to Jeffy about it, the little bastard lies and says he's never seen Mario before in his life. Of course the Brooklyn Guy takes Jeffy's word over Mario's and threatens to arrest him if he ever goes near his ''own house'' again. Mario is rightfully ''pissed'' at this point, mumbling threats to assault and murder Jeffy, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him for wanting revenge. He tries to get inside through the air vents, and ends up crashing down on the floor, seemingly unconscious. Jeffy sees Mario lying on the floor, and, infuriatingly, grabs him and ''literally throws him back outside without a word''. Eventually, Mario ''begs'' Jeffy to just let him inside, which Jeffy refuses to do unless Mario gets him more chocolate cake. So Mario does get another chocolate cake... Which Mario hides in so that he can get inside. When Mario pops out of the cake, he chases Jeffy in a rage... And gets locked out ''again''. And of ''course'' it ends with him getting arrested and Jeffy getting off scott-free for his actions, because Logan ''refuses'' to freaking ''punish'' this kid for the awful things he does. This is honestly the video that cemented my absolute ''loathing'' of Jeffy as a character. He's nothing more than a braindead, unfunny little sociopath that exists for the sole purpose of making Mario's life a complete and utter nightmare, and he's ''well aware'' of that fact. I am very disappointed in Logan. I thought he would have known better after the last time he made a video where Mario was unfairly tormented because of Jeffy...



* Tropers/TommyTiger: I've never watched these, but the "X tells Y (a villain) Something" videos are just awful, because of the disproportionate political rank in the videos. We've had such monstrosities as "[[Disney/TheAristocats Roquefort]] tells [[Disney/AliceInWonderland the Queen of Hearts]] to be quiet", "[[Disney/AGoofyMovie Max]] tells [[Disney/{{Pocahontas}} Governor Ratcliffe]] to get his own life" and [[WesternAnimation/TheFairlyOddParents Vicky]] telling [[Disney/RobinHood Prince John]] BED TWERP (the last one's particularly dumb, as the one who addresses Prince John is as bad as him, if not worse). However, none of these were the motive for this entry. Nope, it was the video "Tommy and Tallulah (I don't know where are they from, but they are freaking ''kids'') tell Prince John to stop and tell him off". I fail to see any logic behind those characters giving the villains a TheReasonYouSuckSpeech. It's a failed attempt at making a MomentOfAwesome that beginned with someone making this kind of video and others hopping on the bandwagon.
17th Aug '17 9:09:18 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said, word for word, this statement: "''[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]''". What the hell, dude? First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to not only be bullied, but ''encouraged'' to commit suicide (Before you ask, no, the action of most citizens of Springfield did ''not'' annoy me, because at least they [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone realized their mistake]]. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really obvious DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the UnintentionallySympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the UnintentionallyUnsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Holy ***... Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations (like people saying nasty things about him and taking joy whenever he has extremely bad things happen to him, including getting killed in fanart, just for being a JerkWithAHeartOfGold)[[/note]] is really painful. This amps the painfulness UpToEleven. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it [and it served him right (though he ''did'' apologize and rewrite it at the end)], but when this guy did it he wasn't.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said, word for word, this statement: "''[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]''". What the hell, dude? First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to not only be bullied, but ''encouraged'' to commit suicide (Before you ask, no, the action of most citizens of Springfield did ''not'' annoy me, because at least they [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone realized their mistake]]. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really obvious DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the UnintentionallySympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the UnintentionallyUnsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Holy ***... Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations (like people saying nasty things about him and taking joy whenever he has extremely bad things happen to him, including getting killed in fanart, just for being a JerkWithAHeartOfGold)[[/note]] is really painful. This amps the painfulness UpToEleven. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man was rightfully bashed for it, realized his mistake and mistake, apologized for it and rewrote it when he did the same, unlike this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it [and it served him right (though he ''did'' apologize and rewrite it at the end)], but when this guy did it he wasn't. guy.
17th Aug '17 9:07:49 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said, word for word, this statement: "''[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]''". What the hell, dude? First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to not only be bullied, but ''encouraged'' to commit suicide (Before you ask, no, the action of most citizens of Springfield did ''not'' annoy me, because at least they [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone realized their mistake]]. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really obvious DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the UnintentionallySympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the UnintentionallyUnsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Holy ***... Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations (like people saying nasty things about him and taking joy whenever he has extremely bad things happen to him, including getting killed in fanart, just for being a JerkWithAHeartOfGold)[[/note]] is really painful. This amps the painfulness UpToEleven. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it (and rightfully so), but when this guy did it he wasn't.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said, word for word, this statement: "''[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]''". What the hell, dude? First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to not only be bullied, but ''encouraged'' to commit suicide (Before you ask, no, the action of most citizens of Springfield did ''not'' annoy me, because at least they [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone realized their mistake]]. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really obvious DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the UnintentionallySympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the UnintentionallyUnsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Holy ***... Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations (like people saying nasty things about him and taking joy whenever he has extremely bad things happen to him, including getting killed in fanart, just for being a JerkWithAHeartOfGold)[[/note]] is really painful. This amps the painfulness UpToEleven. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it (and rightfully so), [and it served him right (though he ''did'' apologize and rewrite it at the end)], but when this guy did it he wasn't.
17th Aug '17 9:06:38 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/CoCage: I would like to present ''Review Tech USA’s'' response to ''If You're Over 30 And You Still Love Nintendo, You're Weird''. Basically, the "controversy" is about a YouTube user named Yoshiller at E3, whom was interviewed by a news crew. The big deal was that he wore a Yoshi hat while interviewed, and other gamers grew a big fuss that he was invoking a bad stereotype. The problem is Rich goes on this rant about projecting stereotypes and being exclusive is wrong, [[{{Hypocrite}} while going on to call Yoshiller man-child and singled him out based on exaggerated rumors and speculations]]. Okay Rich, screw you on this, because you don’t know dick about the guy. I saw the guy’s E3 videos, and he looked and acted fine; perfectly composed. He was just doing his thing and showing support for a company he likes. He never acted like a jerk or an immature brat. [[DoubleStandard So let me get this straight: gamers can’t wear or show any support to a video game/video game company they love publicly, but it’s okay for people who like TV shows or movies to do the same.]] [[SarcasmMode Congratulations dumb-ass]], [[HeWhoFightsMonsters you now just became the thing you hated]] and jumped on the bandwagon like most news sites. Also, Yoshiller responded in the comments section of the video, and makes a comment not meaning to offend anyone and says that he [[Yoshiller]] still supports his own actions, and rightfully calls out on Rich and others for being ousted. What’s worse is that Rich never responds back nor apologizes about his [[CriticalResearchFailure big research failure]] (which he usually does when wrong or mistaken). I never agreed with everything Rich said, but I at least respected him, and gave his views food for thought. After an incident like this, I can say he lost a subscriber.

to:

* Tropers/CoCage: I would like to present ''Review Tech USA’s'' response to ''If You're Over 30 And You Still Love Nintendo, You're Weird''. Basically, the "controversy" is about a YouTube user named Yoshiller at E3, whom was interviewed by a news crew. The big deal was that he wore a Yoshi hat while interviewed, and other gamers grew a big fuss that he was invoking a bad stereotype. The problem is Rich goes on this rant about projecting stereotypes and being exclusive is wrong, [[{{Hypocrite}} while going on to call Yoshiller man-child and singled him out based on exaggerated rumors and speculations]]. Okay Rich, screw you on this, because you don’t know dick about the guy. I saw the guy’s E3 videos, and he looked and acted fine; perfectly composed. He was just doing his thing and showing support for a company he likes. He never acted like a jerk or an immature brat. [[DoubleStandard So let me get this straight: gamers can’t wear or show any support to a video game/video game company they love publicly, but it’s okay for people who like TV shows or movies to do the same.]] [[SarcasmMode Congratulations dumb-ass]], [[HeWhoFightsMonsters you now just became the thing you hated]] and jumped on the bandwagon like most news sites. Also, Yoshiller responded in the comments section of the video, and makes a comment not meaning to offend anyone and says that he [[Yoshiller]] still supports his own actions, and rightfully calls out on Rich and others for being ousted. What’s What’s worse is that Rich never responds back nor apologizes about his [[CriticalResearchFailure big research failure]] (which he usually does when wrong or mistaken). I never agreed with everything Rich said, but I at least respected him, and gave his views food for thought. After an incident like this, I can say he lost a subscriber.



* Tropers/Bismuth83: This is more like a trend (or several), but whatever. The "[insert character here] reacts to X" trend. It's horribly unoriginal, involves stealing content, and it's putting words in people's mouths if the characters are real! Next, the "[character the creator dislikes here] does something bad/embarrassing/stupid" trend. Much the same as above, but it gets worse when the character in the video isn't even the one in question! Third, the "If X likes Y, we gotta shoot them" trend. Dear lord, where do I begin? The fact that this was stolen from a Jimmy Davis YTP, the fact they don't edit it at all (the video could be titled "If Bob likes Tropeville, we gotta shoot him," and the actual video would go: "If you like Walt Disney, we gotta shoot you."), or the [[FanHater Fan Hater-y]] way the videos work?


Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/Bismuth83: This is more like a trend (or several), but whatever. The "[insert character here] reacts to X" trend. It's horribly unoriginal, involves stealing content, and it's putting words in people's mouths if the characters are real! Next, the "[character the creator dislikes here] does something bad/embarrassing/stupid" trend. Much the same as above, but it gets worse when the character in the video isn't even the one in question! Third, the "If X likes Y, we gotta shoot them" trend. Dear lord, where do I begin? The fact that this was stolen from a Jimmy Davis YTP, the fact they don't edit it at all (the video could be titled "If Bob likes Tropeville, we gotta shoot him," and the actual video would go: "If you like Walt Disney, we gotta shoot you."), or the [[FanHater Fan Hater-y]] way the videos work?
** Tropers/TommyTiger: Oh yes, I agree with you. Not only are they bad, they're as original as anything The Copycats from ''WesternAnimation/TheAmazingWorldOfGumball'' did. The "X tells Y (a villain) Something" videos are the worst, because they scream of DidYouJustFlipOffCthulhu (and sometimes, BlackAndBlackMorality), and [[TropesAreTools NOT in a good way]]. We've had such monstrosities as "[[Disney/TheAristocats Roquefort]] tells [[Disney/AliceInWonderland the Queen of Hearts]] to be quiet", "[[Disney/AGoofyMovie Max]] tells [[Disney/{{Pocahontas}} Governor Ratcliffe]] to get his own life" and [[WesternAnimation/TheFairlyOddParents Vicky]] telling [[Disney/RobinHood Prince John]] BED TWERP (the last one's particularly dumb, as the one who addresses Prince John is as bad as him, if not worse). However, none of these were the motive for this entry. Nope, it was the video "Tommy and Tallulah (I don't know where are they from, but they are freaking ''kids'') tell Prince John to stop and tell him off". I fail to see any logic behind those characters giving the villains a TheReasonYouSuckSpeech. It's a failed attempt at making a MomentOfAwesome that beginned with someone making this kind of video and others hopping on the bandwagon.
17th Aug '17 7:42:10 PM Bismuth83
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/Bismuth83: This is more like a trend (or several), but whatever. The "[insert character here] reacts to X" trend. It's horribly unoriginal, involves stealing content, and it's putting words in people's mouths if the characters are real! Next, the "[character the creator dislikes here] does something bad/embarrassing/stupid" trend. Much the same as above, but it gets worse when the character in the video isn't even the one in question! Third, the "If X likes Y, we gotta shoot them" trend. Dear lord, where do I begin? The fact that this was stolen from a Jimmy Davis YTP, the fact they don't edit it at all (the video could be titled "If Bob likes Tropeville, we gotta shoot him," and the actual video would go: "If you like Walt Disney, we gotta shoot you."), or the [[FanHater Fan Hater-y]] way the videos work?
16th Aug '17 10:31:15 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said, word for word, this statement: ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''. What the hell, dude? First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to not only be bullied, but ''encouraged'' to commit suicide (Before you ask, no, the action of most citizens of Springfield did ''not'' annoy me, because at least they [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone realized their mistake]]. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Holy ***... Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations (like people saying nasty things about him and taking joy whenever he has extremely bad things happen to him, including getting killed in fanart, just for being a JerkWithAHeartOfGold)[[/note]] is really painful. This amps the painfulness UpToEleven. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it (and rightfully so), but when this guy did it he wasn't.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said, word for word, this statement: ''"[[MoralEventHorizon "''[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''.Hated]]''". What the hell, dude? First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to not only be bullied, but ''encouraged'' to commit suicide (Before you ask, no, the action of most citizens of Springfield did ''not'' annoy me, because at least they [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone realized their mistake]]. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really apparent obvious DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic UnintentionallySympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic UnintentionallyUnsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Holy ***... Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations (like people saying nasty things about him and taking joy whenever he has extremely bad things happen to him, including getting killed in fanart, just for being a JerkWithAHeartOfGold)[[/note]] is really painful. This amps the painfulness UpToEleven. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it (and rightfully so), but when this guy did it he wasn't.
16th Aug '17 10:29:21 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said, word by word, this statement: ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''. What the hell, dude? First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to not only be bullied, but ''encouraged'' to commit suicide (Before you ask, no, the action of most citizens of Springfield did ''not'' annoy me, because at least they [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone realized their mistake]]. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Holy ***... Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations (like people saying nasty things about him and taking joy whenever he has extremely bad things happen to him, including getting killed in fanart, just for being a JerkWithAHeartOfGold)[[/note]] is really painful. Someone stating Caillou deserved to be arrested for life in the infamous Website/{{GoAnimate}} "Boris Fails to Rob the Bank" video is a bit more painful. This amps the painfulness UpToEleven. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it (and rightfully so), but when this guy did it he wasn't.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said, word by for word, this statement: ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''. What the hell, dude? First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to not only be bullied, but ''encouraged'' to commit suicide (Before you ask, no, the action of most citizens of Springfield did ''not'' annoy me, because at least they [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone realized their mistake]]. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Holy ***... Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations (like people saying nasty things about him and taking joy whenever he has extremely bad things happen to him, including getting killed in fanart, just for being a JerkWithAHeartOfGold)[[/note]] is really painful. Someone stating Caillou deserved to be arrested for life in the infamous Website/{{GoAnimate}} "Boris Fails to Rob the Bank" video is a bit more painful. This amps the painfulness UpToEleven. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it (and rightfully so), but when this guy did it he wasn't.
9th Aug '17 4:37:30 PM jonathan-sherwin
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Tropers/JonathanSherwin: For me, it's when he says that he will review the album track-by-track... and then goes on to skip three tracks: "Getcha Groove On", "It'll Be OK", and the album's 10-minute outro. Now, the Nostalgia Critic called him out for attempting to skip "Photograph" in Luke's review of Nickelback's "All the Right Reasons" and demands that he goes through with his "track-by-track" review. He should've mentioned him doing the same to "Chocolate Starfish", but then again, he probably wouldn't, but still. Not to mention Luke fails to recognize what's obviously Scott Weiland's voice in LB's "Hold On". He knows what he sounds like, and he obviously knows what Fred Durst sounds like, so why the fuck did he go full retard here?
7th Aug '17 1:15:23 PM mightymewtron
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Tropers/MightyMewtron: I have issues with the RunningGag of Pan wanting to screw animated goth girls, but in general I can overlook it because it's usually brief SelfDeprecation and I enjoy his analysis skill and energetic comedy. It becomes harder to stand when he does it towards underage girls, though. The worst example of this is in "Top 10 Worst Redesigns", when he talks about being attractive to Anime/SailorMoon, but learns she's 14 years old. Then he learns the age of consent in Japan is 14, so he jokes about going to Japan, complete with a clip from WesternAnimation/TeenTitansTroubleInTokyo. I know he [[BlackComedy does this type of comedy a lot,]] but this is super uncomfortable, especially when the age of consent doesn't mean adults can have sex with 14 year olds (it means they can have sex with ''other people their age'') and Japanese girls face a lot of sexual assault at the hands of tourists due to this kind of thinking. Pan lampshading how he's fucked up for thinking like that doesn't make it much better either.
26th Jul '17 6:48:03 PM Togie
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Togie: Prior to the early post-release days of VideoGame/PokemonXAndY, I really liked [=TamashiiHiroka=]. I found her Top 10s and her Pokémon beta/alpha videos interesting and entertaining. However, she began to gradually degrade in quality. Probably the first video that I found to be below par was her worst [[OlympusMons Legendary Pokémon]], where she tried to look at what she felt were the worst Legendaries competitively. The problem is, she compared many lesser legendaries to cover ones, which are ''[[PurposefullyOverpowered banned from almost every standard format anyway]]''. The most erroneous example was Jirachi, who made it on the list due to the infamous Paraflinch strategy getting nerfed, despite the fact that Jirachi doesn't need said strategy to be effective. The final nail in the coffin was when she began incorporating politics, namely feminism, to her videos. Even to this day, I don't think Tamashii has recovered at all, and her stats are reflecting this. She used to get at least 300-500 thousand views on her videos, often breaking into the millions. However, many of her recent videos struggle to break even 100 thousand views.
25th Jul '17 7:17:57 AM Piterpicher
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* fluffything: I enjoy watching [=LPs=] on [[PeanutButterGamer PBG Gaming]] on youtube. Not all of them are gems, but they're still enjoyable. That is, until "Part 32" of his [[SelfImposedChallenge Nuzlocke Challenge]] for ''[[VideoGame/PokemonRubyAndSapphire Pokémon Alpha Sapphire]]''. Good lord, what a train wreck. For one thing, he spends several minutes of the video consistently pointing out how he needs to level up his Pokemon to fight Kyogre (Which, I might add, he constantly mispronounces as "Kee-Oh-Gray" instead of "Kai-Oh-Gur") only to jump cut to his Pokemon already leveled up. I know it's boring to watch people level grind in video games. But, then, why make such a big deal about having to level up if there's just going to be a jump cut anyway? All it does is waste the viewer's time.

to:

* fluffything: I enjoy watching [=LPs=] on [[PeanutButterGamer [[WebVideo/PeanutButterGamer PBG Gaming]] on youtube. Not all of them are gems, but they're still enjoyable. That is, until "Part 32" of his [[SelfImposedChallenge Nuzlocke Challenge]] for ''[[VideoGame/PokemonRubyAndSapphire Pokémon Alpha Sapphire]]''. Good lord, what a train wreck. For one thing, he spends several minutes of the video consistently pointing out how he needs to level up his Pokemon to fight Kyogre (Which, I might add, he constantly mispronounces as "Kee-Oh-Gray" instead of "Kai-Oh-Gur") only to jump cut to his Pokemon already leveled up. I know it's boring to watch people level grind in video games. But, then, why make such a big deal about having to level up if there's just going to be a jump cut anyway? All it does is waste the viewer's time.
21st Jul '17 6:46:54 AM FromtheWordsofBR
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even thought the bit with his friend Ralphthemoviemaker was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. The squickiness of the joke isn't what bothered me--it goes on for an entire minute and overall just isn't funny, not even in a BlackComedy sort of sense. What makes this especially jarring is that Ralph doesn't normally do this sort of thing in his own videos. Still a damn good video either way, but good lord.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even thought the bit with his friend Ralphthemoviemaker was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. The squickiness of the joke isn't is not what bothered me--it me--the length of it was. It goes on for an entire minute and overall just isn't funny, not even in a BlackComedy sort of sense. What makes this especially jarring is that Ralph doesn't normally do this sort of thing in his own videos. Still a damn good video either way, but good lord.



* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: The [[BileFascination only reason]] why I've read the ''Watchdog'' blog from the [[MoralGuardians Parents Television Council]] is [[SoBadItsGood to see what hilarious overreaction of the day they have]]. I hate them, but they've never particularly ticked me off... until they "[[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2015/05/06/worst-tv-show-of-the-week-izombie-on-the-cw/ reviewed]]" ''Series/IZombie''. I could already point out several things wrong with this (such as them claiming that it tries to "lure in" audiences with "faux-''Series/VeronicaMars''[=/=]''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''-style dialogue"... when the people behind ''[=iZombie=]'' are the same ones behind ''Veronica Mars''), but the thing that really ticked me off the most was a passage that says "Genre fans claim to watch programs like ''Series/TheWalkingDead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' for the dramatic plots, the quality of the characterization and dialogue, even the humor. Assuming they’re telling the truth and aren’t just turned on by gore..." That's right, they're essentially [[FanHater calling anybody who dare enjoys]] ''The Walking Dead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' people with fetishes for gore. And yet, generalizing people who like those shows is less sickening than Liv eating ramen-brains? Saying things like that only makes you look far more immature than the shows you protest. Also, I know that they've "counteracted" this "claim" several times before, but this demonstrates that they don't know how to use a remote control--just turn the show off if you don't like it, instead of trying to shut it down for people who actually enjoy it for legitimate reasons. If you don't want your kid to watch it, don't let them watch it--it's the parent's job and responsibility to monitor what their kids watch. If their kids are watching something that is "harmful", then don't try to get it shut down for everyone else--just don't let your kids watch it!

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: The [[BileFascination only reason]] why I've read the ''Watchdog'' blog from the [[MoralGuardians Parents Television Council]] is [[SoBadItsGood to see what hilarious overreaction of the day they have]]. I hate them, but they've never particularly ticked me off... until they "[[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2015/05/06/worst-tv-show-of-the-week-izombie-on-the-cw/ reviewed]]" ''Series/IZombie''. I could already point out several things wrong with this (such as them claiming that it tries to "lure in" audiences with "faux-''Series/VeronicaMars''[=/=]''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''-style dialogue"... when the people behind ''[=iZombie=]'' are the same ones behind ''Veronica Mars''), but the thing that really ticked me off the most was a passage that says "Genre fans claim to watch programs like ''Series/TheWalkingDead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' for the dramatic plots, the quality of the characterization and dialogue, even the humor. Assuming they’re telling the truth and aren’t just turned on by gore..." That's right, they're essentially [[FanHater calling anybody who dare enjoys]] ''The Walking Dead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' people with fetishes for gore. And yet, generalizing people who like those shows is less sickening than Liv eating ramen-brains? Saying things like that only makes you look far more immature than the shows you protest. Also, I know that they've "counteracted" this "claim" several times before, but this demonstrates that they don't know how to use a remote control--just turn the show off if you don't like it, instead of trying to shut it down for people who actually enjoy it for legitimate reasons. If you don't want your kid to watch it, don't let them watch it--it's the parent's job and responsibility to monitor what their kids watch. If their kids are watching something that is "harmful", then don't try to get it shut down for everyone else--just don't let your kids watch it!watch, not what the media or the television says.
18th Jul '17 5:34:17 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* ergeis: Oh boy, DeceasedCrab. I never liked him because he's like PewDiePie (who I'm sort of okay with, to be honest) but instead of the Pee Wee Herman personality, he has passive aggression. He even banned people for liking [[VideoGame/MetalGearSolid3SnakeEater the Snake Eater theme]]. What is your problem, DeceasedCrab?

to:

* ergeis: Oh boy, DeceasedCrab. I never liked him because he's like PewDiePie LetsPlay/PewDiePie (who I'm sort of okay with, to be honest) but instead of the Pee Wee Herman personality, he has passive aggression. He even banned people for liking [[VideoGame/MetalGearSolid3SnakeEater the Snake Eater theme]]. What is your problem, DeceasedCrab?
17th Jul '17 11:04:20 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said, word by word, this statement: ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''. What the hell, dude? First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to not only be bullied, but ''encouraged'' to commit suicide (Before you ask, no, the action of most citizens of Springfield did ''not'' annoy me, because at least they [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone realized their mistake]]. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Holy ***... Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations (like people taking joy whenever he has extremely bad things happen to him in fanart)[[/note]] is really painful. Someone stating Caillou deserved to be arrested for life in the infamous Website/{{GoAnimate}} "Boris Fails to Rob the Bank" video is a bit more painful. This amps the painfulness UpToEleven. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it (and rightfully so), but when this guy did it he wasn't.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said, word by word, this statement: ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''. What the hell, dude? First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to not only be bullied, but ''encouraged'' to commit suicide (Before you ask, no, the action of most citizens of Springfield did ''not'' annoy me, because at least they [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone realized their mistake]]. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Holy ***... Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations (like people saying nasty things about him and taking joy whenever he has extremely bad things happen to him him, including getting killed in fanart)[[/note]] fanart, just for being a JerkWithAHeartOfGold)[[/note]] is really painful. Someone stating Caillou deserved to be arrested for life in the infamous Website/{{GoAnimate}} "Boris Fails to Rob the Bank" video is a bit more painful. This amps the painfulness UpToEleven. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it (and rightfully so), but when this guy did it he wasn't.
16th Jul '17 11:37:04 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations[[/note]] is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it (and rightfully so), but when this guy did it he was treated as a hero.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said said, word by word, this statement: ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''. What the hell, dude? First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to not only be bullied bullied, but ''encouraged'' to commit suicide (Before you ask, no, the point where she attempts suicide.action of most citizens of Springfield did ''not'' annoy me, because at least they [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone realized their mistake]]. Second, if you put Lisa instead of Bart, it would still be unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Holy ****... Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations[[/note]] situations (like people taking joy whenever he has extremely bad things happen to him in fanart)[[/note]] is one thing. really painful. Someone stating Caillou deserved to be arrested for life in the infamous Website/{{GoAnimate}} "Boris Fails to Rob the Bank" video is a bit more painful. This is another.amps the painfulness UpToEleven. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was bashed for it (and rightfully so), but when this guy did it he was treated as a hero.wasn't.
10th Jul '17 6:41:00 PM BigKlingy
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=BigKlingy=]: The third part of their "[=JRPGs=] vs [=WRPGs=]" series, and only the third part. The first two were pretty good, and did a great job of explaining the general differences between Japanese [=RPGs=] and Western [=RPGs=] in a neutral manner, with the main point being "[=JRPGs=] and [=WRPGs=] are entirely different genres, comparing them is like comparing apples and oranges". So what do they do in part 3? [[BrokenAesop Compare them.]] Now, it's clear Extra Credits like [=WRPGs=] more than [=JRPGs=], and that's fine. What's not fine is contradicting the main point you spent two whole videos arguing. The third video was one big AuthorFilibuster on [[BiasSteamroller why they think WRPGs are crushing JRPGs]], exactly the kind of thing the previous videos said you shouldn't do. They also make all the typical cliched anti-[=JRPGs=] arguments, like treating ''VideoGame/FinalFantasyXIII'' as if it represents the whole genre, and then said the only reason the ''VideoGame/{{Persona}}'' series (read: one of the few [=JRPGs=] they actually like) is successful is that it incorporates [=WRPG=] elements. What exactly about the recent ''Persona'' games is [=WRPG=]-like? The ability to name the main character? That's [[HelloInsertNameHere a trope that's been used in [=JRPGs=] for a very long time.]] But there, all you're doing is giving a name to a pre-existing character, a [=WRPG=] would have you create your own protagonist, customizing their appearance and backstory. Dialogue choices? Aside from one of two Bad Endings, dialogue choices in ''Persona'' don't shape the story in any way, all they usually do is affect RelationshipValues. [[RomanceSidequest Romance Sidequests?]] That's not exclusive a [=WRPG=] thing.



** Finally, there's the overall condescending, KnowNothingKnowItAll tone being conveyed throughout the message. They act as though '''''everything''''' in Japanese media revolves around manga, anime, and video games; when anyone familiar with the very idea of culture would know ''that it's only a small facet of it''. And even within these subcultures, it's a world of its own. Take some of the most popular manga at large and in history, and compare the art to one another, and you'll see a world of difference. Instead, Extra Credits taut themselves as experts of shit they don't know shit about. Don't believe how ridiculous this is? [[http://i.imgur.com/lnwwVUsg.jpg Here's a post from a Japanese acquaintance fluent in English reacting to said video.]]
10th Jul '17 6:34:35 PM humrh360
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

**Finally, there's the overall condescending, KnowNothingKnowItAll tone being conveyed throughout the message. They act as though '''''everything''''' in Japanese media revolves around manga, anime, and video games; when anyone familiar with the very idea of culture would know ''that it's only a small facet of it''. And even within these subcultures, it's a world of its own. Take some of the most popular manga at large and in history, and compare the art to one another, and you'll see a world of difference. Instead, Extra Credits taut themselves as experts of shit they don't know shit about. Don't believe how ridiculous this is? [[http://i.imgur.com/lnwwVUsg.jpg Here's a post from a Japanese acquaintance fluent in English reacting to said video.]]
10th Jul '17 11:24:00 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


--> '''Alvin Hung:''' OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH [=GoAnimate=] Howe dare you publish Dethroning Moments of Suck? That's it! You are grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded for 142561048293457294718275867291048 years! Now go to your room!\\

to:

--> '''Alvin Hung:''' OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH [=GoAnimate=] Howe OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH! [=GoAnimate=]! How dare you publish Dethroning Moments of Suck? That's it! You are grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded for 142561048293457294718275867291048 years! Now go to your room!\\
10th Jul '17 11:23:13 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


--> '''[=TVTropes=]:''' OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH [=GoAnimate=] you would dare publish Dethroning Moments of Suck while no one is looking? You are grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded for 142561048293457294718275867291048 years! Now go to your room!\\

to:

--> '''[=TVTropes=]:''' '''Alvin Hung:''' OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH [=GoAnimate=] you would Howe dare you publish Dethroning Moments of Suck while no one is looking? Suck? That's it! You are grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded for 142561048293457294718275867291048 years! Now go to your room!\\
9th Jul '17 6:07:52 PM humrh360
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* humrh360: Probably the most blatant sign that they've gone off into being egocentric pseudointellectuals is their "Perversion Subversion - Examining Hentai Sensibility" video. The video more or less takes several gags seen in recent Japanese games at face value, overanalyzes it, and completely misswa the main point that ''it's a gag and it's there for fun''. It's become more and more clear of how puritanical they've become in their ideals, and how they don't truly understand gamers, only their own ideological echo-chamber. It makes me all the more ashamed to have been a fan of them in their early days, and grateful that I lost interest in them when I did.
**Early on, they talk about double-entendres being "acceptable" whereas slapstick is "disturbing", when such a scale of measurement based on morality is pointless. The quality of the gag isn't about morality, it's about execution. Everything else comes down to personal taste. Proceed to overanalyze it as "exploring topics that are uncomfortable to talk about in public by using humor so that it's easier for people consent to it". [[FlatWhat What?]] It's humor. Take a bloody joke, god dammit.
**The crew's "analysis" of sex-related gags and elements throughout ''VideoGame/Yakuza0'' amount to sexual-negativity reminiscent of Fundamentalist Catholic preachings. They treat the "idol cards" Side Quest as if it's straight up stalking, miss the entire plot of the [[ItMakesSenseInContext Side Quest where Kiryu buys a porn mag for a kid]], and let the humor of the Side Quest where Kiryu helps a timid Dominatrix become more assertive fly right over their heads.
**When they get to VideoGame/Persona5, it becomes possibly the most egregious case of them ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontWatch, as they talk about how the sexually predatory nature of the game's StarterVillain were presented as revolting (as the game intended) only to talk about how later Yuusuke Kitagawa, an aspiring genius artist, requesting something of the same nature, though without the same motive, is presented as humorous makes it hypocritical. To go into early game spoilers: [[spoiler: Yusuke requests Ann, the only female team member at that point, to model nude for him. Naturally, the heroes reject this. However, when the arc dungeon sees a dead end (due to the dungeon being a cognitive reflection of its master, who happens to be Yusuke's mentor), the team turn the nude modeling request into an opportunity to infiltrate the dungeon master's home and remove the source of the dead end.]] This results in one of the game's [[HilarityEnsues funniest comedy skits]]. However, it's clear the Extra Credits team barely took the time to actually experience the game's story as they miss out on this. This, as well as everyone about Yusuke's character, who as an artist, has a penchant for the dramatic, but is quite eccentric due to acting with pure and noble intentions, but being unaccustomed to social norms, resulting in his behavior coming off as intrusive or discomforting until he's directly told.
**They also briefly touch on the character Sadayo Kawakami, the player character's homeroom teacher who becomes a Confidant and potentially a romantic partner. However, they incorrectly claim that the player can date Kawakami without consequence, when anyone who's pursued a romance with her (or just read the wiki) can attest how she tells the player character to come back ''after'' he graduates from high school to prevent undue pressure on him as she is completely aware of the unethical nature of having a relationship with a student.
3rd Jul '17 3:07:26 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, Lisa is ''younger'' than Bart, so her torture would be ''more'' [[NightmareFuel uncomfortable]] than Bart. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations[[/note]] is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was hated, but when this guy did it he was treated as a hero.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, if you put Lisa is ''younger'' than instead of Bart, so her torture it would still be ''more'' [[NightmareFuel uncomfortable]] than Bart.unpleasant and uncomfortable, not better or worse. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) receives [[note]]which often leads to DudeNotFunny situations[[/note]] is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was hated, bashed for it (and rightfully so), but when this guy did it he was treated as a hero.
3rd Jul '17 3:04:36 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, Lisa is ''younger'' than Bart, so her torture would be ''more'' [[NightmareFuel uncomfortable]] than Bart. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) gets [[note]]which often goes to [[DudeNotFunny the Seltzer and Friedberg route of comedy]][[/note]] is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was hated, but when this guy did it he was treated as a hero.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, Lisa is ''younger'' than Bart, so her torture would be ''more'' [[NightmareFuel uncomfortable]] than Bart. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) gets receives [[note]]which often goes leads to [[DudeNotFunny the Seltzer and Friedberg route of comedy]][[/note]] DudeNotFunny situations[[/note]] is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the show's most hated character, and therefore deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was hated, but when this guy did it he was treated as a hero.
27th Jun '17 9:01:20 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated.]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, Lisa is ''younger'' than Bart, so her torture would be ''more'' [[NightmareFuel uncomfortable]] than Bart. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) gets [[note]]which often goes to [[DudeNotFunny the Seltzer and Friedberg route of comedy]][[/note]] is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is turned into an insane wreck, don't show sympathy for them. They are the worst character, therefore they deserve it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was hated, but when this guy did it he was treated as a hero.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated.]]"''.Hated]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, Lisa is ''younger'' than Bart, so her torture would be ''more'' [[NightmareFuel uncomfortable]] than Bart. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) gets [[note]]which often goes to [[DudeNotFunny the Seltzer and Friedberg route of comedy]][[/note]] is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is turned into an insane wreck, given extremely bad treatment, don't show sympathy for them. They are the worst show's most hated character, and therefore they deserve deserving of it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was hated, but when this guy did it he was treated as a hero.
26th Jun '17 11:48:37 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated.]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, Lisa is ''younger'' than Bart, so her torture would be ''more'' [[NightmareFuel uncomfortable]] than Bart. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'') gets (which often goes to [[DudeNotFunny the Seltzer and Friedberg route of comedy]]) is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is turned into an insane wreck, don't show sympathy for them. They are the worst character, therefore they deserve it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was hated, but when this guy did it he was treated as a hero.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated.]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, Lisa is ''younger'' than Bart, so her torture would be ''more'' [[NightmareFuel uncomfortable]] than Bart. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'') ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Megward the Wizard]] of the fandom) gets (which [[note]]which often goes to [[DudeNotFunny the Seltzer and Friedberg route of comedy]]) comedy]][[/note]] is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is turned into an insane wreck, don't show sympathy for them. They are the worst character, therefore they deserve it.]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was hated, but when this guy did it he was treated as a hero.
26th Jun '17 11:46:45 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated.]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like because Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, Lisa is ''younger'' than Bart, so her torture would be ''more'' [[NightmareFuel uncomfortable]] than Bart. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'') gets (which often goes to [[DudeNotFunny the Seltzer and Friedberg route of comedy]]) is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is turned into an insane wreck, don't show sympathy for them. They are the worst character, therefore they deserve it.]]"

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated.]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like because [[DisproportionateRetribution just because]] Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, Lisa is ''younger'' than Bart, so her torture would be ''more'' [[NightmareFuel uncomfortable]] than Bart. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'') gets (which often goes to [[DudeNotFunny the Seltzer and Friedberg route of comedy]]) is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is turned into an insane wreck, don't show sympathy for them. They are the worst character, therefore they deserve it.]]"]]" Not to mention this episode is one of Lisa's most sympathetic roles in the show! At least Media Man realized his mistake and apologized for it when he did the same, this guy will never do so. It really pains me that when the former did it, he was hated, but when this guy did it he was treated as a hero.
26th Jun '17 11:44:11 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message
26th Jun '17 11:44:06 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: Do votes in [=TheTopTens=] count? If yes, I'd like to nominate a vote in the "Worst [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]] Episodes" article, specifically one for "The Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because they hate the episode (which I found mediocre at worst), the series or a character. It was a vote where someone straight-up said ''"[[MoralEventHorizon It Would've Be Entertaining If It Was Lisa Who Became Hated.]]"''. First off, it makes it seem like because Lisa is TheScrappy of the series, she ''deserved'' to be bullied to the point where she attempts suicide. Second, Lisa is ''younger'' than Bart, so her torture would be ''more'' [[NightmareFuel uncomfortable]] than Bart. Third, there's a really apparent DoubleStandard. Bart is thought by many to be the sympathetic sibling, so he doesn't deserve this. Lisa is thought to be the unsympathetic sibling, so she deserves this. Seriously, this is so messed up! Seeing the giant amount of hate Kyuubey (the resident RonTheDeathEater of ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'') gets (which often goes to [[DudeNotFunny the Seltzer and Friedberg route of comedy]]) is one thing. This is another. It gives out this message: "[[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop If someone you hate is turned into an insane wreck, don't show sympathy for them. They are the worst character, therefore they deserve it.]]"
21st Jun '17 3:34:50 PM Sammettik
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* JetpackPercy: I saw a few reviews from this text-based web reviewer on Website/DeviantART, called Media Man, and one part was just so cruel, and so infuriating, I vowed not to watch him? What was it? Well, it was his [[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Top-11-WORST-Simpsons-Episodes-430646493 Top 10 Worst Simpsons Episode List]], specifically, his entry for "Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because he bashed an episode, a character, or the series as a whole. It was the entry where he says that Bart deserved the abuse, and "it makes this episode worth watching," claiming because that Bart was an ass in other episodes, he deserved to be [[SarcasmMode rightfully]] bullied in this episode. As indicated by the [[DethroningMoment/TheSimpsons DMOS page]] for ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', Bart was constantly bullied by the entire town, including encouragement to commit suicide near the end. All he did wrong in the episode was miss a fly ball. He didn't deserved to be bullied, no matter what Media Man says. He also says that the town [[Heartwarming/TheSimpsons helping Bart to regain his confidence,]] and not lock the entire city of Springfield into irredeemable territory, was selfish, mean-spirited and cruel to the other team (What, [[SarcasmMode are they going to commit suicide for making a child you don't like feel better]]), and that Marge was in the wrong for chewing out the town. Well, if he thinks that 10-year-olds he doesn't like should be [[SarcasmMode "rightfully"]] tortured to the point of committing suicide for screwing up only ONCE, then consider me out for watching him in the foreseen future.

to:

* JetpackPercy: I saw a few reviews from this text-based web reviewer on Website/DeviantART, called Media Man, and one part was just so cruel, and so infuriating, I vowed not to watch him? What was it? Well, it was his [[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Top-11-WORST-Simpsons-Episodes-430646493 Top "Top 10 Worst Simpsons Episode List]], List", specifically, his entry for "Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because he bashed an episode, a character, or the series as a whole. It was the entry where he says that Bart deserved the abuse, and "it makes this episode worth watching," claiming because that Bart was an ass in other episodes, he deserved to be [[SarcasmMode rightfully]] bullied in this episode. As indicated by the [[DethroningMoment/TheSimpsons DMOS page]] for ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', Bart was constantly bullied by the entire town, including encouragement to commit suicide near the end. All he did wrong in the episode was miss a fly ball. He didn't deserved to be bullied, no matter what Media Man says. He also says that the town [[Heartwarming/TheSimpsons helping Bart to regain his confidence,]] and not lock the entire city of Springfield into irredeemable territory, was selfish, mean-spirited and cruel to the other team (What, [[SarcasmMode are they going to commit suicide for making a child you don't like feel better]]), and that Marge was in the wrong for chewing out the town. Well, if he thinks that 10-year-olds he doesn't like should be [[SarcasmMode "rightfully"]] tortured to the point of committing suicide for screwing up only ONCE, then consider me out for watching him in the foreseen future.



** ElSquibbonator: As of today, he has re-written the aforementioned in a more nuanced and less aggravating manner. He still admits to disliking ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', but he apologizes for the insulting tone of the previous version.
21st Jun '17 1:38:14 AM Sammettik
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/{{deeman45}} I didn't even give him that far of a chance. You mentioned that he's a GrammarNazi? That's putting it lightly--he has banned people for misplacing commas! Frequently in comments that show support for him! I mean, I enjoy proper grammar as much as the next person, but pull the stick OUT of your ass, LetsPlay/DeceasedCrab.



* Vexer Normally I love the EC guys, but sometimes they can really go off the deep end(I.E. their videos about "Hatred" and "Call of Juarez: The Cartel"), but by far their absolute worst episode bar none would have to be "The Division: Problematic Meaning in Mechanics" which is the worst case of CriticalResearchFailure and PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad that i've ever seen. It's abundantly clear that the EC guys only played the game for a couple of hours, as they claim the game is about gunning down innocent civilians, which is a blatant lie as all the NPCs you have to kill are hostile to you from the start and all belong to violent gangs which kill and terrorize innocent people. They also assume that the game is "racist" cause the enemies wear hoodies, they apparently did not take into consideration that the game was made by a Swedish developer, so it's very likely they did not realize that people would misinterpret it. The EC guys also painfully try and make a case about how the game is supporting Totalitarianism, which it clearly is not since society itself has collapsed, also their points about being "judge jury and executioner" fall flat considering New York is under martial law, which means due process is suspended. I could go on and on about how many errors that video has, but my overall point is that the EC guys were letting emotion overtake logic and completely failing to do any actual research on the game itself, and in the past EC were good about responding to criticism from people about their videos, but not anymore it seems, as they never apologized for the inaccuracies in this video or the ones in the "Cartel" and "Hatred" episodes.

to:

* Vexer Vexer: Normally I love the EC guys, but sometimes they can really go off the deep end(I.E. their videos about "Hatred" and "Call of Juarez: The Cartel"), but by far their absolute worst episode bar none would have to be "The Division: Problematic Meaning in Mechanics" which is the worst case of CriticalResearchFailure and PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad that i've ever seen. It's abundantly clear that the EC guys only played the game for a couple of hours, as they claim the game is about gunning down innocent civilians, which is a blatant lie as all the NPCs you have to kill are hostile to you from the start and all belong to violent gangs which kill and terrorize innocent people. They also assume that the game is "racist" cause the enemies wear hoodies, they apparently did not take into consideration that the game was made by a Swedish developer, so it's very likely they did not realize that people would misinterpret it. The EC guys also painfully try and make a case about how the game is supporting Totalitarianism, which it clearly is not since society itself has collapsed, also their points about being "judge jury and executioner" fall flat considering New York is under martial law, which means due process is suspended. I could go on and on about how many errors that video has, but my overall point is that the EC guys were letting emotion overtake logic and completely failing to do any actual research on the game itself, and in the past EC were good about responding to criticism from people about their videos, but not anymore it seems, as they never apologized for the inaccuracies in this video or the ones in the "Cartel" and "Hatred" episodes.
18th Jun '17 12:18:49 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* TroperWall/Sugarp1e1: I didn't appreciate the seventh entry of Website/ScrewAttack's [[https://youtu.be/fZuki3QTb2s Top 10 Worst Cartoons Based on Video Games list]]; [[spoiler:BlazBlue: Alter Memory.]] It's not the fact that Nervous Nick doesn't like [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] that's the problem (I've never even played the game or watched the anime). As with my PhantomStrider entry above, my problem with this list is his reason for putting it on the list as well as his elitist attitude about the whole thing. He starts the entry off by making it clear that he doesn't like the game's world or story, having a very PlayTheGameSkipTheStory attitude about it. Okay, fine. But judging by the clips of the anime he used, [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is actually a pretty faithful adaptation. So why is it bad according to Nick? [[BiasSteamroller Because it's a faithful adaptation of a game he never liked to begin with.]] His bias behind this is clear, what with him spending the entire entry summarizing the story in way that makes it sound even more confusing than it really is (instead of just explaining why he finds it confusing) and ending the entry with him absolutely losing his [[PrecisionFStrike shit]] over how much he hates [[spoiler:BlazBlue]]'s story (especially the whole [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] plot point), claiming "I see [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] for what it really is! It's a mess! I hate it! That's why it's #7." Um, Nick? [[OpinionMyopia Are you implying that the people who do like the story are idiotic sheep?]] To me, it sounds like he's genuinely proclaiming himself to be [[FanHater better than the fans]] because he can't get past the story. Don't get me wrong; I totally agree that the [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] is confusing, especially at the end when [[spoiler:the cycle is finally broken]], but I wouldn't yell at my audience that "The story sucks!" in a way that suggests my subjective opinion is objective fact. And considering how he goes from screaming his lungs out to calmly moving on to #6, it was PlayedForLaughs. You probably also noticed that this DMOS sounds more like I'm talking about the game and not the anime. Nick's tirade was the same way. On top of all that, [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking #7 was the only entry on the list that wasn't an adaptation of a game he liked.]] If he never liked [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] to begin with, then he's in no position to tell us that [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is a bad adaptation just because it's faithful to the source material.

to:

* TroperWall/Sugarp1e1: I didn't appreciate the seventh entry of Website/ScrewAttack's [[https://youtu.be/fZuki3QTb2s Top 10 Worst Cartoons Based on Video Games list]]; [[spoiler:BlazBlue: Alter Memory.[[spoiler:Anime/BlazBlueAlterMemory.]] It's not the fact that Nervous Nick doesn't like [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] [[spoiler:Franchise/BlazBlue]] that's the problem (I've never even played the game or watched the anime). As with my PhantomStrider entry above, my problem with this list is his reason for putting it on the list as well as his elitist attitude about the whole thing. He starts the entry off by making it clear that he doesn't like the game's world or story, having a very PlayTheGameSkipTheStory attitude about it. Okay, fine. But judging by the clips of the anime he used, [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is actually a pretty faithful adaptation. So why is it bad according to Nick? [[BiasSteamroller Because it's a faithful adaptation of a game he never liked to begin with.]] His bias behind this is clear, what with him spending the entire entry summarizing the story in way that makes it sound even more confusing than it really is (instead of just explaining why he finds it confusing) and ending the entry with him absolutely losing his [[PrecisionFStrike shit]] over how much he hates [[spoiler:BlazBlue]]'s [[spoiler:[=BlazBlue=]]]'s story (especially the whole [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] plot point), claiming "I see [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] [[spoiler:[=BlazBlue=]]] for what it really is! It's a mess! I hate it! That's why it's #7." Um, Nick? [[OpinionMyopia Are you implying that the people who do like the story are idiotic sheep?]] To me, it sounds like he's genuinely proclaiming himself to be [[FanHater better than the fans]] because he can't get past the story. Don't get me wrong; I totally agree that the [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] is confusing, especially at the end when [[spoiler:the cycle is finally broken]], but I wouldn't yell at my audience that "The story sucks!" in a way that suggests my subjective opinion is objective fact. And considering how he goes from screaming his lungs out to calmly moving on to #6, it was PlayedForLaughs. You probably also noticed that this DMOS sounds more like I'm talking about the game and not the anime. Nick's tirade was the same way. On top of all that, [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking #7 was the only entry on the list that wasn't an adaptation of a game he liked.]] If he never liked [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] [[spoiler:[=BlazBlue=]]] to begin with, then he's in no position to tell us that [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is a bad adaptation just because it's faithful to the source material.
17th Jun '17 10:44:43 AM FromtheWordsofBR
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I used to really enjoy ''Scientifically Accurate'', but I knew from the get-go that ''Scientifically Accurate [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic My Little Pony]]'' was going to be a huge mess. Shockingly enough, though, the only brony-bashing there is is a mention of how [[spoiler:[[{{Squick}} Beijing considers horse privates a delicacy]]]] (then again, I didn't mind the brony-bashing line in "Today Was a Good Day on the Internet" because everything else in that one was well-executed and [[EarWorm catchy]]). Unfortunately, the rest of the video is just dull. The accurate stuff isn't as hilariously sick and twisted as the other videos are, being just normal stuff real-life horses do. Sure, other videos do that sort of thing, but it's nowhere near as soul-suckingly humorless as it is in this installment.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I used to really enjoy ''Scientifically Accurate'', but I knew from the get-go that ''Scientifically Accurate [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic My Little Pony]]'' was going to be a huge mess. Shockingly enough, though, the only brony-bashing there is is a mention of how [[spoiler:[[{{Squick}} Beijing considers horse privates a delicacy]]]] (then again, I didn't mind the brony-bashing line in "Today Was a Good Day on the Internet" because everything else in that one was well-executed and [[EarWorm catchy]]). Unfortunately, the rest of the video is just dull. The dull; the accurate stuff isn't as hilariously sick and twisted as the other videos are, being just normal stuff real-life horses do. and overall the video is just...boring. Sure, other videos do that sort of thing, but IMO it's nowhere near as soul-suckingly humorless as it is in this installment.



* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even thought the bit with his friend Ralph Sepe was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny... this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), and worst of all, [[DudeNotFunny it's not funny, not even in the black sort of sense]]. It's especially jarring given that Ralph's own videos generally avoid using drawn-out gags like that most of the time. Still a damn good video either way, but good lord.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even thought the bit with his friend Ralph Sepe Ralphthemoviemaker was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It The squickiness of the joke isn't what bothered me--it goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny... this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), an entire minute and worst of all, [[DudeNotFunny it's not overall just isn't funny, not even in the black a BlackComedy sort of sense]]. It's sense. What makes this especially jarring given is that Ralph's Ralph doesn't normally do this sort of thing in his own videos generally avoid using drawn-out gags like that most of the time.videos. Still a damn good video either way, but good lord.
15th Jun '17 6:53:02 AM StFan
Is there an issue? Send a Message


%%* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say I would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet... then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.

to:

%%* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher Creator/JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say I would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet... then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.
12th Jun '17 8:13:52 AM ElSquibbonator
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** ElSquibbonator: As of today, he has re-written the aforementioned in a more nuanced and less aggravating manner. He still admits to disliking ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', but he apologizes for the insulting tone of the previous version.
10th Jun '17 1:26:31 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Troper/{{Lhipenwhe}}: Two incidents that soured me on the WhateleyUniverse; one incident where the rape of a villain was/could be seen by the protagonists and readers as 'just desserts', and the flat-out rape and forceful mutation by a story character. Rape can be a hard topic to cover, but in these instances it completely wrecked whatever enjoyment I took from the stories.

to:

* Troper/{{Lhipenwhe}}: Two incidents that soured me on the WhateleyUniverse; Literature/WhateleyUniverse; one incident where the rape of a villain was/could be seen by the protagonists and readers as 'just desserts', and the flat-out rape and forceful mutation by a story character. Rape can be a hard topic to cover, but in these instances it completely wrecked whatever enjoyment I took from the stories.
10th Jun '17 8:49:55 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Troper/{{cricri3007}}: Now, I really like LetsPlay/BobLennon (a French Youtuber), but there is one of his let's play I just can't watch without wanting to punch him in the face. It's his ''VideoGame/DyingLight'' one. Yes, zombies games are extremley common and Dying Light doesn't really go for something too original. Yes, he had already pointed the PlotHoles and clichés of pretty much every game he's played. But in this one he almost never stop mocking the game for it's ClicheStorm. And, as bad as his frequent mocking of the game is, even worse is his RunningGag about NeckSnaping people. It's introduced after [[spoiler:Kyle has to kill Rahim after he turned into a zombie]] and from on it never stop. And the fact that he plays Kyle (an extremly NiceGuy) as a "bad guy from Manga/FistOfTheNorthStar" just adds to it. Not to mention that he doesn't seem to pay attention to the story that much.
* nickpomar825: I really liked a fair amount of KipkKay's videos, even when he started making his videos based around who was sponsoring him. However in his earbud life hack video, the end has him talking about how "sad" he was over the death of David Bowie whilst telling his viewers about how he was listening to a David Bowie biography bought from Audible. Now, I myself was never the biggest fan of David Bowie, but KipKay using his death to promote the people sponsoring his videos seemed downright scummy.

to:

* Troper/{{cricri3007}}: Now, I really like LetsPlay/BobLennon (a French Youtuber), but there is one of his let's play I just can't watch without wanting to punch him in the face. It's his ''VideoGame/DyingLight'' one. Yes, zombies games are extremley common and Dying Light doesn't really go for something too original. Yes, he had already pointed the PlotHoles and clichés of pretty much every game he's played. But in this one he almost never stop mocking the game for it's ClicheStorm. And, as bad as his frequent mocking of the game is, even worse is his RunningGag about NeckSnaping [[NeckSnap Neck Snaping]] people. It's introduced after [[spoiler:Kyle has to kill Rahim after he turned into a zombie]] and from on it never stop. And the fact that he plays Kyle (an extremly NiceGuy) as a "bad guy from Manga/FistOfTheNorthStar" just adds to it. Not to mention that he doesn't seem to pay attention to the story that much.
* nickpomar825: I really liked a fair amount of KipkKay's [=KipkKay=]'s videos, even when he started making his videos based around who was sponsoring him. However in his earbud life hack video, the end has him talking about how "sad" he was over the death of David Bowie whilst telling his viewers about how he was listening to a David Bowie biography bought from Audible. Now, I myself was never the biggest fan of David Bowie, but KipKay [=KipKay=] using his death to promote the people sponsoring his videos seemed downright scummy.



** Troper/((shonengirl)): Hoo boy, his ''Franchise/{{Pokemon}}'' video... Its hard to point out one moment in particular, but it's basically a series of "jokes" (I think) that have already been beat up to death, revived, HM01'd into tiny pieces, beat up again, horn drilled, and incinerated. And I seriously couldn't tell if it was all supposed to be a bunch of jokes or not due to many of the "jokes" (mainly "hurdy durr Pokeymanz is animal abuse!") being things said with complete seriousness before, and it comes off a lot like some cringy "scrub" ranting about something he knows nothing about, or at least has never played since gen I. The blatant CriticalResearchFailure all over the place was just painful to sit through, so much so I had to skip through tiny segments of it. This was especially jarring since he pulled up the gen I manual, something only hardcore fans usually do, and actually knew that Red is 11... But yet calls Red "Ash", something that no Pokemon fan over 12 would ever do, and he should be relieved that he wasn't swarmed by rabid Red fans by some miracle. If those were jokes, they weren't funny. It doesn't help that the description made me put my hopes up. The only things that were good or new were the bit about him actually getting Red and Blue's ages right, and the mocking of the deviation of game text from what's said in the manual. Everything else is just so cliche and overdone, and I expect more from him. Not to mention it feels like he's trying to jump on the hype train of second wave Pokemania because he can, and free cash. Get gud, Grade, get gud.

to:

** Troper/((shonengirl)): Hoo boy, his ''Franchise/{{Pokemon}}'' video... Its It's hard to point out one moment in particular, but it's basically a series of "jokes" (I think) that have already been beat beaten up to death, revived, HM01'd into tiny pieces, beat up again, horn drilled, and incinerated. And I seriously couldn't tell if it was all supposed to be a bunch of jokes or not due to many of the "jokes" (mainly "hurdy durr Pokeymanz is animal abuse!") being things said with complete seriousness before, and it comes off a lot like some cringy "scrub" ranting about something he knows nothing about, or at least has never played since gen I. The blatant CriticalResearchFailure all over the place was just painful to sit through, so much so I had to skip through tiny segments of it. This was especially jarring since he pulled up the gen I manual, something only hardcore fans usually do, and actually knew that Red is 11... But yet calls Red "Ash", something that no Pokemon fan over 12 would ever do, and he should be relieved that he wasn't swarmed by rabid Red fans by some miracle. If those were jokes, they weren't funny. It doesn't help that the description made me put my hopes up. The only things that were good or new were the bit about him actually getting Red and Blue's ages right, and the mocking of the deviation of game text from what's said in the manual. Everything else is just so cliche and overdone, and I expect more from him. Not to mention it feels like he's trying to jump on the hype train of second wave Pokemania because he can, and free cash. Get gud, Grade, get gud.



* hydrix: How to recognize a Great/Bad anime in just one episode (by digitbro) is something I watch in general to give myself an idea how you can animate a great opening for something that will last very long and a decent chunk of it is well-made/well-explained... until part 2 when he talks about Anime/LuckyStar . Now, the beginning of part 2 already was more of "defending openings I like other people don't" instead of "how a great opening to an anime is structured", but it at least did talk about how these openings still manage to still make a good impression upon first-time viewing, which makes it disappointing for me when he talks more about how the opening of Lucky Star was [[OvershadowedByControversy controversial]] and [[SmallNameBigEgo how he can relate to this opening, outright ignoring that not everyone feels the same way he does]]. The next episode is indeed much better, but that part gives you about the same degree of satisfaction as hearing someone that says that he is going to talk about great paintings only to stop in front of one masturbating while watching it. If the anime community is so toxic that users actively and permanently engage in such behavior it goddamn sucks.

to:

* hydrix: How to recognize a Great/Bad anime in just one episode (by digitbro) is something I watch in general to give myself an idea how you can animate a great opening for something that will last very long and a decent chunk of it is well-made/well-explained... until part 2 when he talks about Anime/LuckyStar .Anime/LuckyStar. Now, the beginning of part 2 already was more of "defending openings I like other people don't" instead of "how a great opening to an anime is structured", but it at least did talk about how these openings still manage to still make a good impression upon first-time viewing, which makes it disappointing for me when he talks more about how the opening of Lucky Star was [[OvershadowedByControversy controversial]] and [[SmallNameBigEgo how he can relate to this opening, outright ignoring that not everyone feels the same way he does]]. The next episode is indeed much better, but that part gives you about the same degree of satisfaction as hearing someone that says that he is going to talk about great paintings only to stop in front of one masturbating while watching it. If the anime community is so toxic that users actively and permanently engage in such behavior it goddamn sucks.



%%* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say i would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet... then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.

to:

%%* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say i I would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet... then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.



* Asue: hotdiggedydemon's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCTcUUYCoBk review of The Powerpuff Girls 2016 reboot]] was a massive disappointment. Now, I do admit to like hdd's stuff (through I don't really like his gross jokes). But this was... Ugh. First of all, this review came waaaaaaay after the initial reaction towards the show (in December of 2016, while the show premiered on April 4, eight months earlier), a.k.a it's old news. I wouldn't usually have a problem with someone reviewing something that was reviewed to death, as long as they bring something new to the table. But he didn't. None of his points were any original or felt fresh whatsoever (from ranting about the reboot toning down the violence, which isn't the cartoon's fault but rather because of the MoralGuardians who complained about the original show's violence, to talk about the main characters not getting their old voice actresses back to the twerking bit). Second, his smug tone during the video made him look like he was trying way too hard to be like "I know better than you, Powerpuff Girls 2016 team" (especially when he actually challenges them to watch this video, which reeks of [[SmallNameBigEgo pretentiousness]]) and made me cringe. And third, he was reading too much into the supposed "anti-feminism" stuff (which was made up just to make the show look like a sexist piece of crap while not even trying to be funny in the process). And this is coming from someone who thought the reboot was "meh". (Also, what was up with that random TakeThat towards ''Franchise/StarWars'' at the end? That was pointless and not even remotely connected to the review at all.)

to:

* Asue: hotdiggedydemon's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCTcUUYCoBk review of The Powerpuff Girls 2016 reboot]] was a massive disappointment. Now, I do admit to like hdd's stuff (through I don't really like his gross jokes). But this was... Ugh. First of all, this review came waaaaaaay after the initial reaction towards the show (in December of 2016, while the show premiered on April 4, eight months earlier), a.k.a it's old news. I wouldn't usually have a problem with someone reviewing something that was reviewed to death, as long as they bring something new to the table. But he didn't. None of his points were any original or felt fresh whatsoever (from ranting about the reboot toning down the violence, which isn't the cartoon's fault but rather because of the MoralGuardians who complained about the original show's violence, to talk talking about the main characters not getting their old voice actresses back to the twerking bit). Second, his smug tone during the video made him look like he was trying way too hard to be like "I know better than you, Powerpuff Girls 2016 team" (especially when he actually challenges them to watch this video, which reeks of [[SmallNameBigEgo pretentiousness]]) and made me cringe. And third, he was reading too much into the supposed "anti-feminism" stuff (which was made up just to make the show look like a sexist piece of crap while not even trying to be funny in the process). And this is coming from someone who thought the reboot was "meh". (Also, what was up with that random TakeThat towards ''Franchise/StarWars'' at the end? That was pointless and not even remotely connected to the review at all.)



* Tropers/ImSpidey2: I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}} trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus in Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[{{Squick}} As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".

to:

* Tropers/ImSpidey2: I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}} trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus in Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull gall to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[{{Squick}} As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".
10th Jun '17 8:37:53 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=TheLemsterPju=]: I am by no means a recurring watcher of [[RebelTaxi RebelTaxi's]] videos, but one of his videos I have seen had a moment which screamed unnecessary. When he covered The Modifyers in his "Top 10 Failed Animated Pilots" video, you know what one of the first things he does? Adding a scene from Zonesama's hentai video of the main character (Agent Xero) getting tentacle raped by the villain. It is quite obvious that he has a huge fascination for the parody animator, but it served no purpose to the video at all, other than an apparent promotion for Zone, and at the same time makes him come across as a bit of creep. This did not go without SelfDeprication in later videos.

to:

* [=TheLemsterPju=]: I am by no means a recurring watcher of [[RebelTaxi RebelTaxi's]] videos, but one of his videos I have seen had a moment which screamed unnecessary. When he covered The Modifyers in his "Top 10 Failed Animated Pilots" video, you know what one of the first things he does? Adding a scene from Zonesama's hentai video of the main character (Agent Xero) getting tentacle raped by the villain. It is quite obvious that he has a huge fascination for the parody animator, but it served no purpose to the video at all, other than an apparent promotion for Zone, and at the same time makes him come across as a bit of creep. This did not go without SelfDeprication SelfDeprecation in later videos.



** [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a similar complaint from his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zJD9B0za9k Pokémon Bootlegs]] video. everything described above applies here: the video is absolutely fantastic. the jokes are on point and gut-bustingly hilarious, but there's one game he could have gone into more detail on, and that's VideoGame/PokemonVietnameseCrystal. He doesn't even go past the opening segment with Professor Oak before switching games. Given that this is a TranslationTrainwreck of [[MemeticMutation memetic degree]], I get that there's probably not much he could say about it that hasn't been said, but that doesn't mean one shouldn't try. [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot He could have at least gotten to]] "[[SugarWiki/CrowningMomentOfFunny BAG FUCK]]" [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot or something and ''then'' quit the game in disgust.]] Once again, I feel like this is one of JonTron's best videos that he's put out, but there was just that one thing he should have gone into more detail about, but didn't.

to:

** [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a similar complaint from his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zJD9B0za9k Pokémon Bootlegs]] video. everything Everything described above applies here: the video is absolutely fantastic. fantastic, the jokes are on point and gut-bustingly hilarious, but there's one game he could have gone into more detail on, and that's VideoGame/PokemonVietnameseCrystal. He doesn't even go past the opening segment with Professor Oak before switching games. Given that this is a TranslationTrainwreck of [[MemeticMutation memetic degree]], I get that there's probably not much he could say about it that hasn't been said, but that doesn't mean one shouldn't try. [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot He could have at least gotten to]] "[[SugarWiki/CrowningMomentOfFunny BAG FUCK]]" [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot or something and ''then'' quit the game in disgust.]] Once again, I feel like this is one of JonTron's best videos that he's put out, but there was just that one thing he should have gone into more detail about, but didn't.



* Lord_Chespin: Now, let me make this clear: I do not hate Creepypastas. I admit that, since literally anybody can write them, there are tons of poorly-written ones out there, but there are some decent ones. However, ''Clockwork: Your Time is Up'' has burned me bad, and made me wary of Creepypastas in general. It's ostensibly about the [[DarkAndTroubledPast origin story]] of what could kindly be called a female Jeff the Killer ripoff, and the circumstances that led to her becoming a serial killer. Let's forget the fact that the story uses AbusiveParents and ''[[{{Squick}} incestuous child rape from her brother]]'' for nothing more than shock value and making her rampage justifiable. Let's forget the fact that [[DeusAngstMachina everything goes wrong]] [[DiabolusExMachina for our protagonist]] in an effort to drive her off the deep end, from the aforementioned abuse to bullying. [[RuleOfThree Let's forget]] [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotSymbolic the shoehorned-in time imagery]]. [[LongList Let's forget]] the how the parents only take her to a therapist after she sews a smile into her face, and how [[AdultsAreUseless the therapist runs off as soon as Natalie, the protagonist, starts to show signs of insanity.]] [[RunningGag Let's forget]] the author's CriticalResearchFailure about how insane asylums work, especially the lack of a term of any kind of medication (the author has a doctor use the term ''"mental drugs"'' to describe the anti-psychotics!). [[OverlyLongGag Let's forget]] [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking the fact that the author's first name is the same as Natalie's, implying an]] AuthorAvatar. No, the real Dethroning Moment of Suck is when, empowered by the doctors [[PlayingWithSyringes sticking needles into her]], Natalie decides to murder her entire family (including her mother, [[DesignatedVillain who did nothing wrong and even tried to stop her abusive dad!]]). The murders are going to be spoilered for {{Squick}}, as they seem like something out of an [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Itchy and Scratchy cartoon]], but here they are: [[spoiler:for her mother, Natalie slams her head into a coat hanger, causing her to become paralyzed, then cuts open her chest and rips out her still-beating heart until she bleeds to death. The worst part is, [[FromBadToWorse this is the nicest death]]. For her father, the gives him a NoHoldsBarredBeatdown, then squashes him with a bedpost steamroller-style, ''causing him to vomit up all his organs''. Finally, for her brother, she pins him to the wall with her knives, [[EyeScream stabs his eye out with a butter knife]], [[{{Fingore}} rips off his toes and fingers,]] and force-feeds him one of his own fingers until he chokes to death. All of this is written in painstaking detail.]] This is presumably supposed to be their karmatic comeuppance, but it just reeks of DisproportionateRetribution- yes, ''even for the incestuous child rapist brother.'' [[RootingForTheEmpire When you begin to pity the incestuous child rapist, it should be a sign that the author's done something horribly, horribly wrong.]] [[AndThereWasMuchRejoicing To the sorrow of pretty much nobody]], the story seems to have been deleted from Wattpad, [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic but the evil will never truly go away.]]

to:

* Lord_Chespin: Now, let me make this clear: I do not hate Creepypastas. I admit that, since literally anybody can write them, there are tons of poorly-written ones out there, but there are some decent ones. However, ''Clockwork: Your Time is Up'' has burned me bad, and made me wary of Creepypastas in general. It's ostensibly about the [[DarkAndTroubledPast origin story]] of what could kindly be called a female Jeff the Killer ripoff, and the circumstances that led to her becoming a serial killer. Let's forget the fact that the story uses AbusiveParents and ''[[{{Squick}} incestuous child rape from her brother]]'' for nothing more than shock value and making her rampage justifiable. Let's forget the fact that [[DeusAngstMachina everything goes wrong]] [[DiabolusExMachina for our protagonist]] in an effort to drive her off the deep end, from the aforementioned abuse to bullying. [[RuleOfThree Let's forget]] [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotSymbolic the shoehorned-in time imagery]]. [[LongList Let's forget]] the how the parents only take her to a therapist after she sews a smile into her face, and how [[AdultsAreUseless the therapist runs off as soon as Natalie, the protagonist, starts to show signs of insanity.]] [[RunningGag Let's forget]] the author's CriticalResearchFailure about how insane asylums work, especially the lack of a term of any kind of medication (the author has a doctor use the term ''"mental drugs"'' to describe the anti-psychotics!). [[OverlyLongGag Let's forget]] [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking the fact that the author's first name is the same as Natalie's, implying an]] AuthorAvatar. No, the real Dethroning Moment of Suck is when, empowered by the doctors [[PlayingWithSyringes sticking needles into her]], Natalie decides to murder her entire family (including her mother, [[DesignatedVillain who did nothing wrong and even tried to stop her abusive dad!]]). The murders are going to be spoilered for {{Squick}}, as they seem like something out of an [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Itchy and Scratchy cartoon]], but here they are: [[spoiler:for her mother, Natalie slams her head into a coat hanger, causing her to become paralyzed, then cuts open her chest and rips out her still-beating heart until she bleeds to death. The worst part is, [[FromBadToWorse this is the nicest death]]. For her father, the gives him a NoHoldsBarredBeatdown, then squashes him with a bedpost steamroller-style, ''causing him to vomit up all his organs''. Finally, for her brother, she pins him to the wall with her knives, [[EyeScream stabs his eye out with a butter knife]], [[{{Fingore}} rips off his toes and fingers,]] and force-feeds him one of his own fingers until he chokes to death. All of this is written in painstaking detail.]] This is presumably supposed to be their karmatic karmic comeuppance, but it just reeks of DisproportionateRetribution- yes, ''even for the incestuous child rapist brother.'' [[RootingForTheEmpire When you begin to pity the incestuous child rapist, it should be a sign that the author's done something horribly, horribly wrong.]] [[AndThereWasMuchRejoicing To the sorrow of pretty much nobody]], the story seems to have been deleted from Wattpad, [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic but the evil will never truly go away.]]
10th Jun '17 8:33:43 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


While the game does encourage increasing the vault population through pregnancy, it never forces all of the women to be pregnant at once and fully allows women to take on the same roles as men, be it fighting and exploring the wasteland or working on maintaining the vault. Fallout is one of the least discriminatory games on the market and its become clear that Anita is just looking for things to complain about to cause controversy. When ''Fallout Shelter'' toned down the violence of the main series she just found something else to complain about. Not liking the games is certainly a fair opinion, but taking the time to actively get offended by mechanics that have been in the series for years now is just [[AttentionWhore attention whoring]]. Get a life Anita.
** hydrix: I have watched the first episode of "Tropes vs. Woman in video games" titled as "The Damsel in Distress" and as someone who, in all honesty, only as bare-bones knowledge about video games (I own a SNES, so yeah) I find the video to be insulting as all hell. So she first mentions the development of Star Fox Adventures, which was first released as an adventure game with a female fox-like protagonist, but later on changed to fit the main character of VideoGame/StarFox as a protagonist, with her as a damsel in distress. That ignores that in general most video games (or at least those that are not shovelware) take a year to make. I might as well use a moral where I say that developers should keep women in a closet during development because the developer of the C64 port of parasol stars saw how his own game was destroyed by his own wife (courtesy of Guru Larry). Then later she talks about the use of it in games such as VideoGame/SuperMarioBros and VideoGame/TheLegendOfZelda series and how it is sexist, outright ignoring that it is more used as a bare-bones plot device rather than anything else. It is insulting to me that those people playing back in the NES days who were playing The Legend of Zelda and widely exploring its world, characters and developments or those playing Super Mario Bros., where they were on a wild adventure with tons of challenges, all get lumped in as sexist morons who were only playing it for the woman/girl at the end. It makes me wonder how the men and women that got the excitement from those series feel about this. In all honesty though, sexism in video games is a thing that needs to be addressed, but what Anita did there was a regurgitation of what already was known back in 1988 with VideoGame/FinalFantasyII , where at one point it is like if you have saved the princess only to get in bed with her to find out that he was doing it with a Lamia Queen, triggering a boss battle where you and all the characters that have been with you up to that point fight against it. It is thus very useless and a waste of time and resources.

to:

While the game does encourage increasing the vault population through pregnancy, it never forces all of the women to be pregnant at once and fully allows women to take on the same roles as men, be it fighting and exploring the wasteland or working on maintaining the vault. Fallout is one of the least discriminatory games on the market and its it's become clear that Anita is just looking for things to complain about to cause controversy. When ''Fallout Shelter'' toned down the violence of the main series she just found something else to complain about. Not liking the games is certainly a fair opinion, but taking the time to actively get offended by mechanics that have been in the series for years now is just [[AttentionWhore attention whoring]]. Get a life Anita.
** hydrix: I have watched the first episode of "Tropes vs. Woman in video games" titled as "The Damsel in Distress" and as someone who, in all honesty, only as has bare-bones knowledge about video games (I own a SNES, so yeah) I find the video to be insulting as all hell. So she first mentions the development of Star Fox Adventures, which was first released as an adventure game with a female fox-like protagonist, but later on changed to fit the main character of VideoGame/StarFox as a protagonist, with her as a damsel in distress. That ignores that in general most video games (or at least those that are not shovelware) take a year to make. I might as well use a moral where I say that developers should keep women in a closet during development because the developer of the C64 port of parasol stars saw how his own game was destroyed by his own wife (courtesy of Guru Larry). Then later she talks about the use of it in games such as VideoGame/SuperMarioBros and VideoGame/TheLegendOfZelda series and how it is sexist, outright ignoring that it is more used as a bare-bones plot device rather than anything else. It is insulting to me that those people playing back in the NES days who were playing The Legend of Zelda and widely exploring its world, characters and developments or those playing Super Mario Bros., where they were on a wild adventure with tons of challenges, all get lumped in as sexist morons who were only playing it for the woman/girl at the end. It makes me wonder how the men and women that got the excitement from those series feel about this. In all honesty though, sexism in video games is a thing that needs to be addressed, but what Anita did there was a regurgitation of what already was known back in 1988 with VideoGame/FinalFantasyII , VideoGame/FinalFantasyII, where at one point it is like if you have saved the princess only to get in bed with her to find out that he was doing it with a Lamia Queen, triggering a boss battle where you and all the characters that have been with you up to that point fight against it. It is thus very useless and a waste of time and resources.
10th Jun '17 8:29:22 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Vexer: For me it's his stupid, obnoxious and incredibly childish hate-boner for Creator/RobLiefeld, I know people have reasons not to like him, but this dumbass just goes way too far (suggesting one of his comics killed somebody? LOL yeah right!) in his incessant, whiny bitching about him. His pathetic speech in "The Rise and Fall of the Comics Empire part 3" being his absolute worst, saying he's not sorry for attacking Liefeld and ignoring the many legitimate reasons he had for leaving Marvel and most pathetic of all, saying he would "lose credibility" with comics fans for being "too nice" to Liefeld, which is a complete load of bullshit, comic fans aren't going to riot over something like that, way to stereotype your own audience dumbfuck!

to:

** Vexer: For me it's his stupid, obnoxious and incredibly childish hate-boner for Creator/RobLiefeld, I know people have reasons not to like him, but this dumbass just goes way too far (suggesting one of his comics killed somebody? LOL yeah right!) in his incessant, whiny bitching about him. His pathetic speech in "The Rise and Fall of the Comics Empire part 3" being his absolute worst, saying he's not sorry for attacking Liefeld and ignoring the many legitimate reasons he had for leaving Marvel and most pathetic of all, saying he would "lose credibility" with comics fans for being "too nice" to Liefeld, which is a complete load of bullshit, comic fans aren't going to riot over something like that, way that. Way to stereotype your own audience audience, dumbfuck!



* [=TSF=]: Before season 4 of ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic'', I used to enjoy Digibrony's (or [[SuddenNameChange Digibro]]) content relating to the show. His reviews and analysis were, for the most part, fair. He thinks the episode "Magical Mystery Cure" is good,to the point where he calls it his favorite episode of the entire series-- he thinks ''WebAnimation/DoubleRainboom'' is a fantastic piece of fan work. Both opinions of which I respectively disagree. I don't think that episode was that good nor "Double Rainboom", but I could see why he likes those episodes. Now, there's a reason why I said "before season 4". And that's because after his review on the first episode of that season "Princess Twilight Sparkle", he took a big nosedive in terms of fairness and quality. Much like Brony Curious (or... pfft, [[SuddenNameChange Tommy Oliver]]), who is another member of the brony analysis community who I'm disappointed with, Digi became more pessimistic towards the episodes he reviewed, focusing more on critique rather than enjoyment. It's okay to critique something,yes, but you have to decide whether you enjoy it or not so you won't end up like a CausticCritic. One example of his downhill descent is in his semi-collaboration with Tommy Oliver's "Equestria Games" review, where one of their major criticisms,if not the major, is that it [[ExpectingSomeoneTaller focused more on Spike instead of the actual Equestria Games]]. And admittedly, while I consider Tommy to be not as bad as Digi, I expected better from him. Wouldn't it be okay to just say whether or not you actually enjoy Spike's conflict instead of complaining that the episode didn't focus on the games? But... the video that made me done with him was his "Twilight's Kingdom" review, where he bashed the song "You'll Play Your Part" because it didn't have any purpose (which,by the way, it had a clear point) and called it the worst song of the entire show. And he also bashed the new design of Twilight's home, the castle, [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks calling it visually unpleasing, empty, and a poor replacement for Twilight's "iconic" treehouse]]... saying this without giving it a decent chance. I believe this is one of the main reasons why he stopped watching the show. There are other reasons why I hated that review, but those two stand out for me. Now I like anime, but the reason why I won't watch his current anime reviews and analysis (which ironically, are better) is because I can't watch them without scoffing and feeling underwhelmed after that review. He believes the show is going downhill after season 4, I believe the contrary, dear Digibro. In fact, I believe you made it down the hill. Unsubscribed!

to:

* [=TSF=]: Before season 4 of ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic'', I used to enjoy Digibrony's (or [[SuddenNameChange Digibro]]) content relating to the show. His reviews and analysis were, for the most part, fair. He thinks the episode "Magical Mystery Cure" is good,to the point where he calls it his favorite episode of the entire series-- he thinks ''WebAnimation/DoubleRainboom'' is a fantastic piece of fan work. Both opinions of which I respectively disagree. I don't think that episode was that good nor "Double Rainboom", but I could see why he likes those episodes. Now, there's a reason why I said "before season 4". And that's because after his review on the first episode of that season "Princess Twilight Sparkle", he took a big nosedive in terms of fairness and quality. Much like Brony Curious (or... pfft, [[SuddenNameChange Tommy Oliver]]), who is another member of the brony analysis community who I'm disappointed with, Digi became more pessimistic towards the episodes he reviewed, focusing more on critique rather than enjoyment. It's okay to critique something,yes, but you have to decide whether you enjoy it or not so you won't end up like a CausticCritic. One example of his downhill descent is in his semi-collaboration with Tommy Oliver's "Equestria Games" review, where one of their major criticisms,if not the major, is that it [[ExpectingSomeoneTaller focused more on Spike instead of the actual Equestria Games]]. And admittedly, while I consider Tommy to be not as bad as Digi, I expected better from him. Wouldn't it be okay to just say whether or not you actually enjoy Spike's conflict instead of complaining that the episode didn't focus on the games? But... the video that made me done with him was his "Twilight's Kingdom" review, where he bashed the song "You'll Play Your Part" because it didn't have any purpose (which,by (which, by the way, it had a clear point) and called it the worst song of the entire show. And he also bashed the new design of Twilight's home, the castle, [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks calling it visually unpleasing, empty, and a poor replacement for Twilight's "iconic" treehouse]]... saying this without giving it a decent chance. I believe this is one of the main reasons why he stopped watching the show. There are other reasons why I hated that review, but those two stand out for me. Now I like anime, but the reason why I won't watch his current anime reviews and analysis (which ironically, are better) is because I can't watch them without scoffing and feeling underwhelmed after that review. He believes the show is going downhill after season 4, I believe the contrary, dear Digibro. In fact, I believe you made it down the hill. Unsubscribed!



* fluffything: Normally, I like WebOriginal/{{Markiplier}} . He seems like a pretty cool and nice guy most of the time. Which makes the following DMOS all the worse. For me, his worst moment was during his charity LP in May in which he played ''Yoshi's Island'' with Wade and [[FanNickname Stone-Faced Tyler]]. During the playthrough, they answered questions from fans. One of which was "What is your favorite Pokemon?" and Mark stating he didn't like Pokemon. Now, him not being a fan of the series isn't the problem. He's entitled to his opinion. The DMOS part is that he acted like a total douche about it. For one thing, he snarked that all Pokemon games are essentially the same. Not only is this innacurate, since Pokemon games do have some degree of variety to them (Many games have features only exclusive to that particular version), but it's also hypocritical. Many games follow some sort of formula in terms of gameplay, meaning one could argue that the various sequels spin-offs and fan-games of ''Five Nights At Freddy's'' Mark has played are essentially "the same game". Second, he took the whole "If you could choose between ending world hunger and making Pokemon real, which starter would you choose?" meme seriously. He does realize that's a joke, right? Apparently not, since he then remarks about how horrible the world would be if Pokemon actually existed. [[SarcasmMode Because, ya know, pointing out the horrible aspects of a childhood fantasy is soooo mature.]] But, the worst example of his douchiness is how he acts like Pokemon fans are idiots for getting excited for any upcoming games (Again, tying into the whole "it's the same" hypocritical argument mentioned beforehand). It's hypocritical since Mark has gushed over various games in the past as well. The whole thing just comes off as immature, rude, and utterly hypocritical. Again, if Mark doesn't like the Pokemon games, fine. However, he could've handled answering that fan's question in a nicer manner than being a total dick about it.

to:

* fluffything: Normally, I like WebOriginal/{{Markiplier}} .WebOriginal/{{Markiplier}}. He seems like a pretty cool and nice guy most of the time. Which makes the following DMOS all the worse. For me, his worst moment was during his charity LP in May in which he played ''Yoshi's Island'' with Wade and [[FanNickname Stone-Faced Tyler]]. During the playthrough, they answered questions from fans. One of which was "What is your favorite Pokemon?" and Mark stating he didn't like Pokemon. Now, him not being a fan of the series isn't the problem. He's entitled to his opinion. The DMOS part is that he acted like a total douche about it. For one thing, he snarked that all Pokemon games are essentially the same. Not only is this innacurate, since Pokemon games do have some degree of variety to them (Many games have features only exclusive to that particular version), but it's also hypocritical. Many games follow some sort of formula in terms of gameplay, meaning one could argue that the various sequels spin-offs and fan-games of ''Five Nights At Freddy's'' Mark has played are essentially "the same game". Second, he took the whole "If you could choose between ending world hunger and making Pokemon real, which starter would you choose?" meme seriously. He does realize that's a joke, right? Apparently not, since he then remarks about how horrible the world would be if Pokemon actually existed. [[SarcasmMode Because, ya know, pointing out the horrible aspects of a childhood fantasy is soooo mature.]] But, the worst example of his douchiness is how he acts like Pokemon fans are idiots for getting excited for any upcoming games (Again, tying into the whole "it's the same" hypocritical argument mentioned beforehand). It's hypocritical since Mark has gushed over various games in the past as well. The whole thing just comes off as immature, rude, and utterly hypocritical. Again, if Mark doesn't like the Pokemon games, fine. However, he could've handled answering that fan's question in a nicer manner than being a total dick about it.
10th Jun '17 8:27:48 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=TSF=]: Before season 4 of ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipisMagic'', I used to enjoy Digibrony's (or [[SuddenNameChange Digibro]]) content relating to the show. His reviews and analysis were, for the most part, fair. He thinks the episode "Magical Mystery Cure" is good,to the point where he calls it his favorite episode of the entire series-- he thinks ''WebAnimation/DoubleRainboom'' is a fantastic piece of fan work. Both opinions of which I respectively disagree. I don't think that episode was that good nor "Double Rainboom", but I could see why he likes those episodes. Now, there's a reason why I said "before season 4". And that's because after his review on the first episode of that season "Princess Twilight Sparkle", he took a big nosedive in terms of fairness and quality. Much like Brony Curious (or... pfft, [[SuddenNameChange Tommy Oliver]]), who is another member of the brony analysis community who I'm disappointed with, Digi became more pessimistic towards the episodes he reviewed, focusing more on critique rather than enjoyment. It's okay to critique something,yes, but you have to decide whether you enjoy it or not so you won't end up like a CausticCritic. One example of his downhill descent is in his semi-collaboration with Tommy Oliver's "Equestria Games" review, where one of their major criticisms,if not the major, is that it [[ExpectingSomeoneTaller focused more on Spike instead of the actual Equestria Games]]. And admittedly, while I consider Tommy to be not as bad as Digi, I expected better from him. Wouldn't it be okay to just say whether or not you actually enjoy Spike's conflict instead of complaining that the episode didn't focus on the games? But... the video that made me done with him was his "Twilight's Kingdom" review, where he bashed the song "You'll Play Your Part" because it didn't have any purpose (which,by the way, it had a clear point) and called it the worst song of the entire show. And he also bashed the new design of Twilight's home, the castle, [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks calling it visually unpleasing, empty, and a poor replacement for Twilight's "iconic" treehouse]]... saying this without giving it a decent chance. I believe this is one of the main reasons why he stopped watching the show. There are other reasons why I hated that review, but those two stand out for me. Now I like anime, but the reason why I won't watch his current anime reviews and analysis (which ironically, are better) is because I can't watch them without scoffing and feeling underwhelmed after that review. He believes the show is going downhill after season 4, I believe the contrary, dear Digibro. In fact, I believe you made it down the hill. Unsubscribed!

to:

* [=TSF=]: Before season 4 of ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipisMagic'', ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic'', I used to enjoy Digibrony's (or [[SuddenNameChange Digibro]]) content relating to the show. His reviews and analysis were, for the most part, fair. He thinks the episode "Magical Mystery Cure" is good,to the point where he calls it his favorite episode of the entire series-- he thinks ''WebAnimation/DoubleRainboom'' is a fantastic piece of fan work. Both opinions of which I respectively disagree. I don't think that episode was that good nor "Double Rainboom", but I could see why he likes those episodes. Now, there's a reason why I said "before season 4". And that's because after his review on the first episode of that season "Princess Twilight Sparkle", he took a big nosedive in terms of fairness and quality. Much like Brony Curious (or... pfft, [[SuddenNameChange Tommy Oliver]]), who is another member of the brony analysis community who I'm disappointed with, Digi became more pessimistic towards the episodes he reviewed, focusing more on critique rather than enjoyment. It's okay to critique something,yes, but you have to decide whether you enjoy it or not so you won't end up like a CausticCritic. One example of his downhill descent is in his semi-collaboration with Tommy Oliver's "Equestria Games" review, where one of their major criticisms,if not the major, is that it [[ExpectingSomeoneTaller focused more on Spike instead of the actual Equestria Games]]. And admittedly, while I consider Tommy to be not as bad as Digi, I expected better from him. Wouldn't it be okay to just say whether or not you actually enjoy Spike's conflict instead of complaining that the episode didn't focus on the games? But... the video that made me done with him was his "Twilight's Kingdom" review, where he bashed the song "You'll Play Your Part" because it didn't have any purpose (which,by the way, it had a clear point) and called it the worst song of the entire show. And he also bashed the new design of Twilight's home, the castle, [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks calling it visually unpleasing, empty, and a poor replacement for Twilight's "iconic" treehouse]]... saying this without giving it a decent chance. I believe this is one of the main reasons why he stopped watching the show. There are other reasons why I hated that review, but those two stand out for me. Now I like anime, but the reason why I won't watch his current anime reviews and analysis (which ironically, are better) is because I can't watch them without scoffing and feeling underwhelmed after that review. He believes the show is going downhill after season 4, I believe the contrary, dear Digibro. In fact, I believe you made it down the hill. Unsubscribed!
10th Jun '17 8:26:37 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** fluffything: For me, the DMOS was the beginning of his review of ''Equestria Girls''. Why? Two reasons. First off, he calls people who complained about [[FanNickname Alicorn Twilight]] (and Hasbro's marketing practices in general) "Insane Bronies". That's just immature. Even if he doesn't agree with their opinions, that doesn't give them the right to call them insane. The second reason is even worse. When he explains that the movie got a limited theatrical release, he explains that many Bronies chose to instead watch pirated online downloads of the movie. He then makes the claim that said Bronies did so because they didn't want to be viewed as pedophiles for wanting to see a movie geared towards children. [[{{Beat}} ...]] What? Are you kidding me? That's just ridiculous. There are so many other and far more legitimate reasons why someone would be unable to see the movie in theaters. Maybe the movie wasn't playing near where they lived, maybe they couldn't see it due to scheduling conflicts, or maybe they were simply broke at the time and couldn't afford going to the movies. But, no, instead, The Cartoon Hero decides to make a MistakenForPedophile joke. Again, that's just immature.

to:

** fluffything: For me, the DMOS was the beginning of his review of ''Equestria Girls''. Why? Two reasons. First off, he calls people who complained about [[FanNickname Alicorn Twilight]] (and Hasbro's marketing practices in general) "Insane Bronies". That's just immature. Even if he doesn't agree with their opinions, that doesn't give them the right to call them insane. The second reason is even worse. When he explains that the movie got a limited theatrical release, he explains that many Bronies chose to instead watch pirated online downloads of the movie. He then makes the claim that said Bronies did so because they didn't want to be viewed as pedophiles for wanting to see a movie geared towards children. children [[{{Beat}} ...]] What? Are you kidding me? That's just ridiculous. There are so many other and far more legitimate reasons why someone would be unable to see the movie in theaters. Maybe the movie wasn't playing near where they lived, maybe they couldn't see it due to scheduling conflicts, or maybe they were simply broke at the time and couldn't afford going to the movies. But, no, instead, The Cartoon Hero decides to make a MistakenForPedophile joke. Again, that's just immature.



** Vexer: For me it's his stupid, obnoxious and incredibly childish hate-boner for Creator//RobLiefeld, I know people have reasons not to like him, but this dumbass just goes way too far (suggesting one of his comics killed somebody? LOL yeah right!) in his incessant, whiny bitching about him. His pathetic speech in "The Rise and Fall of the Comics Empire part 3" being his absolute worst, saying he's not sorry for attacking Liefeld and ignoring the many legitimate reasons he had for leaving Marvel and most pathetic of all, saying he would "lose credibility" with comics fans for being "too nice" to Liefeld, which is a complete load of bullshit, comic fans aren't going to riot over something like that, way to stereotype your own audience dumbfuck!

to:

** Vexer: For me it's his stupid, obnoxious and incredibly childish hate-boner for Creator//RobLiefeld, Creator/RobLiefeld, I know people have reasons not to like him, but this dumbass just goes way too far (suggesting one of his comics killed somebody? LOL yeah right!) in his incessant, whiny bitching about him. His pathetic speech in "The Rise and Fall of the Comics Empire part 3" being his absolute worst, saying he's not sorry for attacking Liefeld and ignoring the many legitimate reasons he had for leaving Marvel and most pathetic of all, saying he would "lose credibility" with comics fans for being "too nice" to Liefeld, which is a complete load of bullshit, comic fans aren't going to riot over something like that, way to stereotype your own audience dumbfuck!
10th Jun '17 8:18:42 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/ParaChomp: "Search for the Worst: Suicide Squad". I will not argue against negative criticism against ''Film/SuicideSquad2016'', it's justified. What I will argue against are the constant questioning of the existence of various characters. One can see them as IHE pointing out them being unnecessary for the film but when he compared Killer Croc to Gorilla Grodd, you could tell that either wasn't the case or he's being too vague with the intentions of his words. There is nothing wrong with either of them as characters in terms of premise, same can be said about Captain Boomerang and Katana. All four of these characters have proven their worth in other pieces of media. There are so many characters who use trick weapons for combat and Katana was as relevant as ever due to ''WesternAnimation/BewareTheBatman''. One of the film's problems are its many unnecessary characters but these characters have been well written in other media and have relevance to the source material which is something IHE doesn't acknowledge. I do realize that I am an IDIOT trying to win such an argument. This is someone who doesn't care about the history of comics nor their characters, only wants a good movie, and uses Aquaman and Kite Man as their Trope/ButtMonkey. Once again, the wound that the UsefulNotes/TheComicsCode has left shows its ugly face proving that even the Trope/DarkerAndEdgier adaptions can't hide it.

to:

* Tropers/ParaChomp: "Search for the Worst: Suicide Squad". I will not argue against negative criticism against ''Film/SuicideSquad2016'', it's justified. What I will argue against are is the constant questioning of the existence of various characters. One can see them as IHE pointing out them being unnecessary for the film but when he compared Killer Croc to Gorilla Grodd, you could tell that either wasn't the case or he's being too vague with the intentions of his words. There is nothing wrong with either of them as characters in terms of premise, same can be said about Captain Boomerang and Katana. All four of these characters have proven their worth in other pieces of media. There are so many characters who use trick weapons for combat and Katana was as relevant as ever due to ''WesternAnimation/BewareTheBatman''. One of the film's problems are is its hacing many unnecessary characters characters, but these characters have been well written in other media and have relevance to the source material which is something IHE doesn't acknowledge. I do realize that I am an IDIOT trying to win such an argument. This is someone who doesn't care about the history of comics nor their characters, only wants a good movie, and uses Aquaman and Kite Man as their Trope/ButtMonkey. Once again, the wound that the UsefulNotes/TheComicsCode has left shows its ugly face proving that even the Trope/DarkerAndEdgier adaptions adaptations can't hide it.
10th Jun '17 5:14:55 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* WarioGuy: The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6W7q79hdr4E "Splatoon vs. de Blob"]] video bothers me a bit. The animation here seems to be a bit lazier. But the kicker here is the "joke". As the Inklings continue on their Turf Wars, a de Blob Slime comes out of nowhere and...takes out his slime wang and inks all over the Inklings. Keep in mind that the Inklings are 14. It's disturbing enough, made worse with a close up of a female inkling enjoying being splattering by the ink. Basically, the whole video is just a lame dick jerking joke made worse with the Inkings being underage. I felt really unclean after this.

to:

* WarioGuy: The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6W7q79hdr4E "Splatoon vs. de Blob"]] video bothers me a bit. The animation here seems to be a bit lazier. But the kicker here is the "joke". As the Inklings continue on their Turf Wars, a de Blob Slime comes out of nowhere and... takes out his slime wang and inks all over the Inklings. Keep in mind that the Inklings are 14. It's disturbing enough, made worse with a close up of a female inkling enjoying being splattering by the ink. Basically, the whole video is just a lame dick jerking joke made worse with the Inkings being underage. I felt really unclean after this.



* Kablammin45: Website/GoAnimate "Grounded" videos are something of a [[BileFascination guilty pleasure of mine]], and there are a few I sometimes watch over and over again just because of how [[{{Narm}} unintentionally hilarious]] they are. However, words cannot describe how infuriating [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NUh6LmjVgY this particular video]] (specifically its [[DownerEnding outrageously mean-spirited ending]]) was to me. Basically, WesternAnimation/{{Caillou}}'s dad/Boris decides to go rob a bank, but Caillou foils Boris's plans by calling the police. What pushed me to cite this as my Dethroning Moment here? Caillou doesn't just get grounded, he winds up arrested for ''life'' just for being a baby show character, [[NoGoodDeedGoesUnpunished despite doing something heroic for once]]. Meanwhile, the police give Boris a luxury jail cell with a full bathroom and TV and allow him to beat up Caillou whenever he wants...just because he doesn't like Caillou. So basically, [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic Boris]] commits a felony [[KarmaHoudini and gets rewarded in the end (aside from being in jail)]] just because the [[PoliceAreUseless police]] side with him over [[UnintentionallySympathetic Caillou]], [[YankTheDogsChain who gets the raw end of the deal]] despite actually doing something good for once. I know that the fanbase hates Caillou and other baby show characters, but, honestly, I don't see how the user [[EsotericHappyEnding thought this was an ending]] [[MoralDissonance everyone would agree with]]. (Even the comments section is full of people [[WhatTheHellPlayer calling him out]] over this, so it isn't just me who feels this way.)

to:

* Kablammin45: Website/GoAnimate "Grounded" videos are something of a [[BileFascination guilty pleasure of mine]], and there are a few I sometimes watch over and over again just because of how [[{{Narm}} unintentionally hilarious]] they are. However, words cannot describe how infuriating [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NUh6LmjVgY this particular video]] (specifically its [[DownerEnding outrageously mean-spirited ending]]) was to me. Basically, WesternAnimation/{{Caillou}}'s dad/Boris decides to go rob a bank, but Caillou foils Boris's plans by calling the police. What pushed me to cite this as my Dethroning Moment here? Caillou doesn't just get grounded, he winds up arrested for ''life'' just for being a baby show character, [[NoGoodDeedGoesUnpunished despite doing something heroic for once]]. Meanwhile, the police give Boris a luxury jail cell with a full bathroom and TV and allow him to beat up Caillou whenever he wants... just because he doesn't like Caillou. So basically, [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic Boris]] commits a felony [[KarmaHoudini and gets rewarded in the end (aside from being in jail)]] just because the [[PoliceAreUseless police]] side with him over [[UnintentionallySympathetic Caillou]], [[YankTheDogsChain who gets the raw end of the deal]] despite actually doing something good for once. I know that the fanbase hates Caillou and other baby show characters, but, honestly, I don't see how the user [[EsotericHappyEnding thought this was an ending]] [[MoralDissonance everyone would agree with]]. (Even the comments section is full of people [[WhatTheHellPlayer calling him out]] over this, so it isn't just me who feels this way.)



* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even thought the bit with his friend Ralph Sepe was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny....this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), and worst of all, [[DudeNotFunny it's not funny, not even in the black sort of sense]]. It's especially jarring given that Ralph's own videos generally avoid using drawn-out gags like that most of the time. Still a damn good video either way, but good lord.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even thought the bit with his friend Ralph Sepe was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny....funny... this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), and worst of all, [[DudeNotFunny it's not funny, not even in the black sort of sense]]. It's especially jarring given that Ralph's own videos generally avoid using drawn-out gags like that most of the time. Still a damn good video either way, but good lord.



* Tropers/CJCroen1393: In Matthew's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0oP7CK8zl0 "Top 10 Weirdest Dinosaurs You Never Knew Existed"]], he gets to ''Jeholopterus'', which he [[PteroSoarer mistakenly refers to as a dinosaur]] (I gave that a pass, since it's a common mistake), but then he calls it a "prehistoric equivalent to the vampire bat" that bit into bigger dinosaurs to suck their blood. That's right, he cited [[KnowNothingKnowItAll David]] [[SmallNameBigEgo Peters]] and his so-called [[CriticalResearchFailure "research"]]. Come on, Matt! All the other prehistoric animals there were relatively accurate! And there are plenty of weird underrated pterosaurs you could have picked for that! What about ''Nyctosaurus'' and its freaky head-crest and nigh-inability to walk? Or ''Hatzegopteryx'', the largest animal to ever fly that ate small dinosaurs for breakfast, lunch and dinner? Or ''Tupandactylus'' which...well, [[http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/reptilepedia/images/0/0b/Tupandactylus_imperator.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20110709133444 just look at it!]]

to:

* Tropers/CJCroen1393: In Matthew's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0oP7CK8zl0 "Top 10 Weirdest Dinosaurs You Never Knew Existed"]], he gets to ''Jeholopterus'', which he [[PteroSoarer mistakenly refers to as a dinosaur]] (I gave that a pass, since it's a common mistake), but then he calls it a "prehistoric equivalent to the vampire bat" that bit into bigger dinosaurs to suck their blood. That's right, he cited [[KnowNothingKnowItAll David]] [[SmallNameBigEgo Peters]] and his so-called [[CriticalResearchFailure "research"]]. Come on, Matt! All the other prehistoric animals there were relatively accurate! And there are plenty of weird underrated pterosaurs you could have picked for that! What about ''Nyctosaurus'' and its freaky head-crest and nigh-inability to walk? Or ''Hatzegopteryx'', the largest animal to ever fly that ate small dinosaurs for breakfast, lunch and dinner? Or ''Tupandactylus'' which... well, [[http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/reptilepedia/images/0/0b/Tupandactylus_imperator.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20110709133444 just look at it!]]



* @/AxMachina: Deleting my previous Media Man rage, I found some more [[DarthWiki/DethroningMomentOfSuck dethroning moments]] under his belt. In two reviews[[note]][[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Reviews-The-Simpsons-428256345 The Simpsons one]], and the [[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Reviews-Home-Alone-1-and-2-419401546 Home Alone one]][[/note]], our CausticCritic says he doesn't like a child character because of him being bratty, or too smart for his own good. Now, this could have been something I could've said was a good point...right up until he had a [[DudeNotFunny "joke"]] where he [[WouldHurtAChild killed one of the characters with a nuclear bomb, and another with a rocket launcher.]] And, to top it all of, in one of the comments calling him out on this, he claims that he's "unique" because of it, then tries to explain himself by saying it was his AuthorAvatar saying it and that [[JustJokingJustification it was supposed to be humorously exaggerated.]] Hey, Media Man. [[{{Hypocrite}} Remember how you said that Bart was evil because he's usually an asshole? How can you say that when you yourself joked about murdering children, and showed no regret, guilt or shame towards your actions because it was a "joke"?]]

to:

* @/AxMachina: Deleting my previous Media Man rage, I found some more [[DarthWiki/DethroningMomentOfSuck dethroning moments]] under his belt. In two reviews[[note]][[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Reviews-The-Simpsons-428256345 The Simpsons one]], and the [[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Reviews-Home-Alone-1-and-2-419401546 Home Alone one]][[/note]], our CausticCritic says he doesn't like a child character because of him being bratty, or too smart for his own good. Now, this could have been something I could've said was a good point... right up until he had a [[DudeNotFunny "joke"]] where he [[WouldHurtAChild killed one of the characters with a nuclear bomb, and another with a rocket launcher.]] And, to top it all of, in one of the comments calling him out on this, he claims that he's "unique" because of it, then tries to explain himself by saying it was his AuthorAvatar saying it and that [[JustJokingJustification it was supposed to be humorously exaggerated.]] Hey, Media Man. [[{{Hypocrite}} Remember how you said that Bart was evil because he's usually an asshole? How can you say that when you yourself joked about murdering children, and showed no regret, guilt or shame towards your actions because it was a "joke"?]]



** shonengirl: Third. This is hands down, the worst thing in the history of his channel. Two things I [[BerserkButton absolutely hate]] are when reviewers seem to know little about what they're talking about, and when they lump things of varying quality into one mass and declare them all bad/judge them all solely on the quality of some of them or an unfortunate DorkAge. Basically, I despise CriticalResearchFailure... And him putting every single [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] reboot on that list just screamed both of these things. Okay Strider, what about the Tom and Jerry, Ninja Turtles, anything Mickey Mouse related, and Looney Toons reboots, are ''they'' bad too because their franchises have been around for a long time and have truckloads of reboots? No? Actually, what ''about'' Tom and Jerry? It's also a Hanna-Barbera franchise that has been around forever, if not even longer than [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]], but he conveniently forgets that, doesn't he? There are many LongRunners that continue to be loved to this day, so by this logic they're all bad simply because they've been around to see the civil rights movement... [[SarcasmMode Sure, Strider, sure]]. [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] was actually pretty solid and had deviated quite a bit from the normal episodic format, not to mention the series fills in a western animation niche that doesn't get filled often in the modern day, the genre of mystery. The only other modern cartoon in this genre I can think of is Gravity Falls, which ended, while [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] will continue filling this niche with a fresh new take every time. Oh yeah, what about counting movies as reboots? ...Huh?! I've disagreed with him before, sure, but respected his opinion because he seems like a genuinely nice person and is entertaining on top of it; this was the only time I ever cringed at this guy's content ever. I'm not even a huge fan of [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]], but this was just bad! It just really reminds me of those people who think Pokémon is a series consisting of the same game released over and over again, or whining that Nintendo has no innovation despite many of their franchises evolving over the years. To make it worse, I criticized him for this, and if I didn't accidentally delete it, he apparently removed my comment. Come on, Strider, I expect more from you! Oh yeah, and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking how the hell is Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog a reboot?! Shouldn't video game adaptations have a list of their own?]]

to:

** shonengirl: Third. This is hands down, the worst thing in the history of his channel. Two things I [[BerserkButton absolutely hate]] are when reviewers seem to know little about what they're talking about, and when they lump things of varying quality into one mass and declare them all bad/judge them all solely on the quality of some of them or an unfortunate DorkAge. Basically, I despise CriticalResearchFailure... And him putting every single [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] reboot on that list just screamed both of these things. Okay Strider, what about the Tom and Jerry, Ninja Turtles, anything Mickey Mouse related, and Looney Toons reboots, are ''they'' bad too because their franchises have been around for a long time and have truckloads of reboots? No? Actually, what ''about'' Tom and Jerry? It's also a Hanna-Barbera franchise that has been around forever, if not even longer than [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]], but he conveniently forgets that, doesn't he? There are many LongRunners that continue to be loved to this day, so by this logic they're all bad simply because they've been around to see the civil rights movement... [[SarcasmMode Sure, Strider, sure]]. [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] was actually pretty solid and had deviated quite a bit from the normal episodic format, not to mention the series fills in a western animation niche that doesn't get filled often in the modern day, the genre of mystery. The only other modern cartoon in this genre I can think of is Gravity Falls, which ended, while [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] will continue filling this niche with a fresh new take every time. Oh yeah, what about counting movies as reboots? ... Huh?! I've disagreed with him before, sure, but respected his opinion because he seems like a genuinely nice person and is entertaining on top of it; this was the only time I ever cringed at this guy's content ever. I'm not even a huge fan of [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]], but this was just bad! It just really reminds me of those people who think Pokémon is a series consisting of the same game released over and over again, or whining that Nintendo has no innovation despite many of their franchises evolving over the years. To make it worse, I criticized him for this, and if I didn't accidentally delete it, he apparently removed my comment. Come on, Strider, I expect more from you! Oh yeah, and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking how the hell is Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog a reboot?! Shouldn't video game adaptations have a list of their own?]]



** ''SenorCornholio'': Fourthed. I'm honestly the first troper on this segment to have enjoyed this video for the most part, with things like bomb bowling and calling out the Gorons for being such picky eaters being highlights. However, I will admit it had some serious flaws: the points he made were more YMMV than actual bad game design, his jabs at ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaSkywardSword Skyward Sword]]'' were unneeded and deviated from the rest of the video entirely, [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking and he said twice that Impa was the one that gave you the letter instead of Zelda]]. However, those aren't my main gripes. See, I could understand talking about Skyward Sword and using Ocarina of Time as a way to show how the ideas adopted in that game ended up forming this "spoiled rich kid" in the series. That's fine...then along comes the part where he talks about ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaALinkBetweenWorlds A Link Between Worlds]]''. He goes to countless lengths praising how greatly implemented its mechanics were, while taking extra shots at ''Skyward Sword'' and ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaTwilightPrincess Twilight Princess]]''. Hey guys, did you know!? [[CaptainObvious Egoraptor doesn't like 3D Zeldas!]] I just thought he didn't hammer it into your heads enough! And what's more is that, just like his gripes with Skyward Sword, they were really not needed at all. Yes, the Spinner was hardly ever used, and the Magic Armor was a very situational item (until the HD release where you can get a much bigger wallet, anyway), but did he really need to mention any of this? It feels more like this segment existed to toot Arin's own horn and complain about more 3D mechanics, and it also felt shoehorned in due to Arin playing ''ABLW'' and liking it. I love [[GirlChanInParadise most]] [[Music/StarBomb of]] [[WebVideo/GameGrumps Arin's]] [[WebAnimation/AwesomeSeries work,]] I enjoy him as a creator, and I know he's a good person in real life, but this was just a pointless moment in an already polarizing review.

to:

** ''SenorCornholio'': Fourthed. I'm honestly the first troper on this segment to have enjoyed this video for the most part, with things like bomb bowling and calling out the Gorons for being such picky eaters being highlights. However, I will admit it had some serious flaws: the points he made were more YMMV than actual bad game design, his jabs at ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaSkywardSword Skyward Sword]]'' were unneeded and deviated from the rest of the video entirely, [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking and he said twice that Impa was the one that gave you the letter instead of Zelda]]. However, those aren't my main gripes. See, I could understand talking about Skyward Sword and using Ocarina of Time as a way to show how the ideas adopted in that game ended up forming this "spoiled rich kid" in the series. That's fine... then along comes the part where he talks about ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaALinkBetweenWorlds A Link Between Worlds]]''. He goes to countless lengths praising how greatly implemented its mechanics were, while taking extra shots at ''Skyward Sword'' and ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaTwilightPrincess Twilight Princess]]''. Hey guys, did you know!? [[CaptainObvious Egoraptor doesn't like 3D Zeldas!]] I just thought he didn't hammer it into your heads enough! And what's more is that, just like his gripes with Skyward Sword, they were really not needed at all. Yes, the Spinner was hardly ever used, and the Magic Armor was a very situational item (until the HD release where you can get a much bigger wallet, anyway), but did he really need to mention any of this? It feels more like this segment existed to toot Arin's own horn and complain about more 3D mechanics, and it also felt shoehorned in due to Arin playing ''ABLW'' and liking it. I love [[GirlChanInParadise most]] [[Music/StarBomb of]] [[WebVideo/GameGrumps Arin's]] [[WebAnimation/AwesomeSeries work,]] I enjoy him as a creator, and I know he's a good person in real life, but this was just a pointless moment in an already polarizing review.



** Creator/{{shonengirl}}: The above two don't really bother me that much, since I know where he's coming from, and at worse find them just somewhat tasteless. However, his review of ''Anime/PokemonOrigins'' was just poorly made. Highlights include mistaking the year the first Pokemon games were released as 1995 (it's actually 1996, and to make this worse this was shown in a clip in the video itself) and mistaking 2015 as its 20th anniversary (so this wasn't a script error either), questioning why Team Rocket needs scientists and wild Pokemon to create and test the Master Ball, and apparently not knowing who Red, one of the most well-known and well-loved characters in the fandom, to the point of being a MemeticBadass, is. The worst and most cringeworthy part, however, has to be him seeing ''Origins'' being TruerToTheText of the original games as a flaw, and that it takes away the "charm" of the anime. Um... [[CompletelyMissingThePoint That's the point, bro]]. It's supposed to be a more faithful adaptation. Stop thinking about the main anime, that has almost nothing to do with ''Origins'', an adaptation of game canon, and the two should be kept as far, far away from eachother as possible. Anyone who is familiar with the Pokemon fandom will tell you that mixing up the games and anime is a major BerserkButton for many fans of the games, and it highly annoys me as well. You know why many fans of the games hate the anime? One of the reasons is that it deviates from the games so much like some obscure spinoff manga that never saw light outside of Japan, despite it being the face of the franchise to the general public. I don't hate the anime necessarily, but he's essentially saying it should have copied the style of the anime because... Togo berries and a vague "charm". Question, wouldn't that make ''Origins'' pointless? Also, people should just play the games to experience the story? I'm sorry... [[FlatWhat What]]. ...Excuse me, [[BigWhat WHAT?!]] Um, ok, then I guess every adaptation ever has no reason to exist! The ''Harry Potter'' movies? Pointless! Comic book movies? Pointless! The ''Lord of the Rings'' film series? Pointless! *facepalm* As if ''Origins'' doesn't have charm on its own; I know I'm not the only one who finds the artstyle of the movie/miniseries extremely charming. Hero, you obviously haven't been involved with the games in a long time, or at least are one of those extremely casual fans that still thinks the anime is the WordOfGod. I didn't feel anywhere near the same passion that, say, [[WebShow/AtopTheFourthWall Linkara]] had (by the way, I highly recommend him regarding internet personalities talking about Pokemon). I like your reviews usually, but get gud, please.

to:

** Creator/{{shonengirl}}: The above two don't really bother me that much, since I know where he's coming from, and at worse find them just somewhat tasteless. However, his review of ''Anime/PokemonOrigins'' was just poorly made. Highlights include mistaking the year the first Pokemon games were released as 1995 (it's actually 1996, and to make this worse this was shown in a clip in the video itself) and mistaking 2015 as its 20th anniversary (so this wasn't a script error either), questioning why Team Rocket needs scientists and wild Pokemon to create and test the Master Ball, and apparently not knowing who Red, one of the most well-known and well-loved characters in the fandom, to the point of being a MemeticBadass, is. The worst and most cringeworthy part, however, has to be him seeing ''Origins'' being TruerToTheText of the original games as a flaw, and that it takes away the "charm" of the anime. Um... [[CompletelyMissingThePoint That's the point, bro]]. It's supposed to be a more faithful adaptation. Stop thinking about the main anime, that has almost nothing to do with ''Origins'', an adaptation of game canon, and the two should be kept as far, far away from eachother as possible. Anyone who is familiar with the Pokemon fandom will tell you that mixing up the games and anime is a major BerserkButton for many fans of the games, and it highly annoys me as well. You know why many fans of the games hate the anime? One of the reasons is that it deviates from the games so much like some obscure spinoff manga that never saw light outside of Japan, despite it being the face of the franchise to the general public. I don't hate the anime necessarily, but he's essentially saying it should have copied the style of the anime because... Togo berries and a vague "charm". Question, wouldn't that make ''Origins'' pointless? Also, people should just play the games to experience the story? I'm sorry... [[FlatWhat What]]. ...What]]... Excuse me, [[BigWhat WHAT?!]] Um, ok, then I guess every adaptation ever has no reason to exist! The ''Harry Potter'' movies? Pointless! Comic book movies? Pointless! The ''Lord of the Rings'' film series? Pointless! *facepalm* As if ''Origins'' doesn't have charm on its own; I know I'm not the only one who finds the artstyle of the movie/miniseries extremely charming. Hero, you obviously haven't been involved with the games in a long time, or at least are one of those extremely casual fans that still thinks the anime is the WordOfGod. I didn't feel anywhere near the same passion that, say, [[WebShow/AtopTheFourthWall Linkara]] had (by the way, I highly recommend him regarding internet personalities talking about Pokemon). I like your reviews usually, but get gud, please.



* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: The [[BileFascination only reason]] why I've read the ''Watchdog'' blog from the [[MoralGuardians Parents Television Council]] is [[SoBadItsGood to see what hilarious overreaction of the day they have]]. I hate them, but they've never particularly ticked me off...until they "[[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2015/05/06/worst-tv-show-of-the-week-izombie-on-the-cw/ reviewed]]" ''Series/IZombie''. I could already point out several things wrong with this (such as them claiming that it tries to "lure in" audiences with "faux-''Series/VeronicaMars''[=/=]''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''-style dialogue"...when the people behind ''[=iZombie=]'' are the same ones behind ''Veronica Mars''), but the thing that really ticked me off the most was a passage that says "Genre fans claim to watch programs like ''Series/TheWalkingDead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' for the dramatic plots, the quality of the characterization and dialogue, even the humor. Assuming they’re telling the truth and aren’t just turned on by gore..." That's right, they're essentially [[FanHater calling anybody who dare enjoys]] ''The Walking Dead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' people with fetishes for gore. And yet, generalizing people who like those shows is less sickening than Liv eating ramen-brains? Saying things like that only makes you look far more immature than the shows you protest. Also, I know that they've "counteracted" this "claim" several times before, but this demonstrates that they don't know how to use a remote control--just turn the show off if you don't like it, instead of trying to shut it down for people who actually enjoy it for legitimate reasons. If you don't want your kid to watch it, don't let them watch it--it's the parent's job and responsibility to monitor what their kids watch. If their kids are watching something that is "harmful", then don't try to get it shut down for everyone else--just don't let your kids watch it!
* [=TSF=]: Before season 4 of ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipisMagic'' , I used to enjoy Digibrony's (or [[SuddenNameChange Digibro]]) content relating to the show. His reviews and analysis were, for the most part, fair. He thinks the episode "Magical Mystery Cure" is good,to the point where he calls it his favorite episode of the entire series-- he thinks ''WebAnimation/DoubleRainboom'' is a fantastic piece of fan work. Both opinions of which I respectively disagree. I don't think that episode was that good nor "Double Rainboom", but I could see why he likes those episodes. Now, there's a reason why I said "before season 4". And that's because after his review on the first episode of that season "Princess Twilight Sparkle", he took a big nosedive in terms of fairness and quality. Much like Brony Curious (or...pfft, [[SuddenNameChange Tommy Oliver]]), who is another member of the brony analysis community who I'm disappointed with, Digi became more pessimistic towards the episodes he reviewed, focusing more on critique rather than enjoyment. It's okay to critique something,yes, but you have to decide whether you enjoy it or not so you won't end up like a CausticCritic. One example of his downhill descent is in his semi-collaboration with Tommy Oliver's "Equestria Games" review, where one of their major criticisms,if not the major, is that it [[ExpectingSomeoneTaller focused more on Spike instead of the actual Equestria Games]]. And admittedly, while I consider Tommy to be not as bad as Digi, I expected better from him. Wouldn't it be okay to just say whether or not you actually enjoy Spike's conflict instead of complaining that the episode didn't focus on the games? But...the video that made me done with him was his "Twilight's Kingdom" review, where he bashed the song "You'll Play Your Part" because it didn't have any purpose (which,by the way, it had a clear point) and called it the worst song of the entire show. And he also bashed the new design of Twilight's home, the castle, [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks calling it visually unpleasing, empty, and a poor replacement for Twilight's "iconic" treehouse]]...saying this without giving it a decent chance. I believe this is one of the main reasons why he stopped watching the show. There are other reasons why I hated that review, but those two stand out for me. Now I like anime, but the reason why I won't watch his current anime reviews and analysis (which ironically, are better) is because I can't watch them without scoffing and feeling underwhelmed after that review. He believes the show is going downhill after season 4, I believe the contrary, dear Digibro. In fact, I believe you made it down the hill. Unsubscribed!

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: The [[BileFascination only reason]] why I've read the ''Watchdog'' blog from the [[MoralGuardians Parents Television Council]] is [[SoBadItsGood to see what hilarious overreaction of the day they have]]. I hate them, but they've never particularly ticked me off... until they "[[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2015/05/06/worst-tv-show-of-the-week-izombie-on-the-cw/ reviewed]]" ''Series/IZombie''. I could already point out several things wrong with this (such as them claiming that it tries to "lure in" audiences with "faux-''Series/VeronicaMars''[=/=]''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''-style dialogue"... when the people behind ''[=iZombie=]'' are the same ones behind ''Veronica Mars''), but the thing that really ticked me off the most was a passage that says "Genre fans claim to watch programs like ''Series/TheWalkingDead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' for the dramatic plots, the quality of the characterization and dialogue, even the humor. Assuming they’re telling the truth and aren’t just turned on by gore..." That's right, they're essentially [[FanHater calling anybody who dare enjoys]] ''The Walking Dead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' people with fetishes for gore. And yet, generalizing people who like those shows is less sickening than Liv eating ramen-brains? Saying things like that only makes you look far more immature than the shows you protest. Also, I know that they've "counteracted" this "claim" several times before, but this demonstrates that they don't know how to use a remote control--just turn the show off if you don't like it, instead of trying to shut it down for people who actually enjoy it for legitimate reasons. If you don't want your kid to watch it, don't let them watch it--it's the parent's job and responsibility to monitor what their kids watch. If their kids are watching something that is "harmful", then don't try to get it shut down for everyone else--just don't let your kids watch it!
* [=TSF=]: Before season 4 of ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipisMagic'' , ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipisMagic'', I used to enjoy Digibrony's (or [[SuddenNameChange Digibro]]) content relating to the show. His reviews and analysis were, for the most part, fair. He thinks the episode "Magical Mystery Cure" is good,to the point where he calls it his favorite episode of the entire series-- he thinks ''WebAnimation/DoubleRainboom'' is a fantastic piece of fan work. Both opinions of which I respectively disagree. I don't think that episode was that good nor "Double Rainboom", but I could see why he likes those episodes. Now, there's a reason why I said "before season 4". And that's because after his review on the first episode of that season "Princess Twilight Sparkle", he took a big nosedive in terms of fairness and quality. Much like Brony Curious (or... pfft, [[SuddenNameChange Tommy Oliver]]), who is another member of the brony analysis community who I'm disappointed with, Digi became more pessimistic towards the episodes he reviewed, focusing more on critique rather than enjoyment. It's okay to critique something,yes, but you have to decide whether you enjoy it or not so you won't end up like a CausticCritic. One example of his downhill descent is in his semi-collaboration with Tommy Oliver's "Equestria Games" review, where one of their major criticisms,if not the major, is that it [[ExpectingSomeoneTaller focused more on Spike instead of the actual Equestria Games]]. And admittedly, while I consider Tommy to be not as bad as Digi, I expected better from him. Wouldn't it be okay to just say whether or not you actually enjoy Spike's conflict instead of complaining that the episode didn't focus on the games? But... the video that made me done with him was his "Twilight's Kingdom" review, where he bashed the song "You'll Play Your Part" because it didn't have any purpose (which,by the way, it had a clear point) and called it the worst song of the entire show. And he also bashed the new design of Twilight's home, the castle, [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks calling it visually unpleasing, empty, and a poor replacement for Twilight's "iconic" treehouse]]... saying this without giving it a decent chance. I believe this is one of the main reasons why he stopped watching the show. There are other reasons why I hated that review, but those two stand out for me. Now I like anime, but the reason why I won't watch his current anime reviews and analysis (which ironically, are better) is because I can't watch them without scoffing and feeling underwhelmed after that review. He believes the show is going downhill after season 4, I believe the contrary, dear Digibro. In fact, I believe you made it down the hill. Unsubscribed!



* batmany: On YouTube, there's a three-part animated "series" (in the loosest sense of the word possible) titled "[[FiveNightsAtFreddys Freddy's Lament]]" by Skylegend Animation. As one probably guessed already, it's a series of FNAF fan animations. Actually, that's not an accurate description as I found out to my utter disappointment. The videos have almost nothing to do with FNAF save for characters making what can best be described as cameo appearances. Many of them have no reason to appear other than to pander to the fanbase. And, to make matters worse, much of their appearances don't make any sense. A good example is that Springtrap makes a cameo in one video even though the whole thing is supposed to take place around 1987 (the year FNAF 2 takes place). And, while the animation is stunning (with admittedly very-creepy imagery), it does nothing to excuse the nearly incoherent plot. What is the plot of the videos? Well, from what little I could decipher out of the TrueArtIsIncomprehensible mess, it's the origin story of The Puppet. And, oh, boy, does it get to painful levels of pretentiousness. This videos' take on The Puppet's origin? [[spoiler:Some random unpopular pre-teen girl is tricked into going to a party at Freddy Fazbear's, is teased because she has a crush on some guy, runs away crying, and is murdered....I guess?]] The plot never reveals exactly how this results in The Puppet's birth (so to speak). Either way, it's so blatant and utterly forced that it pretty much smears its proverbial feces over the subtlety of Scott Cawthon's work. Had this been some generic horror cartoon, I may've forgiven it for it's incoherent and pretentious plot. However, the fact that Skylegend Animation had the gall to drag FNAF into something this poorly done (Again, save for the animation and creepiness), causes it to go from simply forgettable to plain awful.

to:

* batmany: On YouTube, there's a three-part animated "series" (in the loosest sense of the word possible) titled "[[FiveNightsAtFreddys Freddy's Lament]]" by Skylegend Animation. As one probably guessed already, it's a series of FNAF fan animations. Actually, that's not an accurate description as I found out to my utter disappointment. The videos have almost nothing to do with FNAF save for characters making what can best be described as cameo appearances. Many of them have no reason to appear other than to pander to the fanbase. And, to make matters worse, much of their appearances don't make any sense. A good example is that Springtrap makes a cameo in one video even though the whole thing is supposed to take place around 1987 (the year FNAF 2 takes place). And, while the animation is stunning (with admittedly very-creepy imagery), it does nothing to excuse the nearly incoherent plot. What is the plot of the videos? Well, from what little I could decipher out of the TrueArtIsIncomprehensible mess, it's the origin story of The Puppet. And, oh, boy, does it get to painful levels of pretentiousness. This videos' take on The Puppet's origin? [[spoiler:Some random unpopular pre-teen girl is tricked into going to a party at Freddy Fazbear's, is teased because she has a crush on some guy, runs away crying, and is murdered....murdered... I guess?]] The plot never reveals exactly how this results in The Puppet's birth (so to speak). Either way, it's so blatant and utterly forced that it pretty much smears its proverbial feces over the subtlety of Scott Cawthon's work. Had this been some generic horror cartoon, I may've forgiven it for it's incoherent and pretentious plot. However, the fact that Skylegend Animation had the gall to drag FNAF into something this poorly done (Again, save for the animation and creepiness), causes it to go from simply forgettable to plain awful.



** MetaMaster54610: You'd think Logan would have learned his lesson from the fiasco Jeffy's Bad Word caused. He knew full well how loathed that video was, so you'd think he'd know better than to create Jeffy's Bad Word 2.0 in the form of 'Locked Out'. The plot of the video is that Mario is trying to get Jeffy to eat his peas, promising him chocolate cake if he eats his peas. Rather than eating his peas, Jeffy pours them onto his high chair seat and tries to lie to Mario about it. When Mario rightfully denies him chocolate cake for not actually eating his dinner, Jeffy throws a tantrum. Admittedly, it was a dick move to have Mario eat a piece of chocolate cake in front of Jeffy, but what happens next is disproportionate retribution at its finest. Jeffy tricks Mario into going outside, then locks him out so he can steal the cake. He locks all the doors and traps Mario outside. In this video, Jeffy clearly has malicious intent, and knows ''exactly'' what he's doing. Mario is locked outside in the cold, trying everything he can to get back inside. And then the Brooklyn Guy shows up, and when he shows up in a Jeffy video, you immediately know Mario is in for a bad time. The Brooklyn Officer thinks that Mario is trying to break into the house, and when he talks to Jeffy about it, the little bastard lies and says he's never seen Mario before in his life. Of course the Brooklyn Guy takes Jeffy's word over Mario's and threatens to arrest him if he ever goes near his ''own house'' again. Mario is rightfully ''pissed'' at this point, mumbling threats to assault and murder Jeffy, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him for wanting revenge. He tries to get inside through the air vents, and ends up crashing down on the floor, seemingly unconscious. Jeffy sees Mario lying on the floor, and, infuriatingly, grabs him and ''literally throws him back outside without a word''. Eventually, Mario ''begs'' Jeffy to just let him inside, which Jeffy refuses to do unless Mario gets him more chocolate cake. So Mario does get another chocolate cake...Which Mario hides in so that he can get inside. When Mario pops out of the cake, he chases Jeffy in a rage...And gets locked out ''again''. And of ''course'' it ends with him getting arrested and Jeffy getting off scott-free for his actions, because Logan ''refuses'' to freaking ''punish'' this kid for the awful things he does. This is honestly the video that cemented my absolute ''loathing'' of Jeffy as a character. He's nothing more than a braindead, unfunny little sociopath that exists for the sole purpose of making Mario's life a complete and utter nightmare, and he's ''well aware'' of that fact. I am very disappointed in Logan. I thought he would have known better after the last time he made a video where Mario was unfairly tormented because of Jeffy...

to:

** MetaMaster54610: You'd think Logan would have learned his lesson from the fiasco Jeffy's Bad Word caused. He knew full well how loathed that video was, so you'd think he'd know better than to create Jeffy's Bad Word 2.0 in the form of 'Locked Out'. The plot of the video is that Mario is trying to get Jeffy to eat his peas, promising him chocolate cake if he eats his peas. Rather than eating his peas, Jeffy pours them onto his high chair seat and tries to lie to Mario about it. When Mario rightfully denies him chocolate cake for not actually eating his dinner, Jeffy throws a tantrum. Admittedly, it was a dick move to have Mario eat a piece of chocolate cake in front of Jeffy, but what happens next is disproportionate retribution at its finest. Jeffy tricks Mario into going outside, then locks him out so he can steal the cake. He locks all the doors and traps Mario outside. In this video, Jeffy clearly has malicious intent, and knows ''exactly'' what he's doing. Mario is locked outside in the cold, trying everything he can to get back inside. And then the Brooklyn Guy shows up, and when he shows up in a Jeffy video, you immediately know Mario is in for a bad time. The Brooklyn Officer thinks that Mario is trying to break into the house, and when he talks to Jeffy about it, the little bastard lies and says he's never seen Mario before in his life. Of course the Brooklyn Guy takes Jeffy's word over Mario's and threatens to arrest him if he ever goes near his ''own house'' again. Mario is rightfully ''pissed'' at this point, mumbling threats to assault and murder Jeffy, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him for wanting revenge. He tries to get inside through the air vents, and ends up crashing down on the floor, seemingly unconscious. Jeffy sees Mario lying on the floor, and, infuriatingly, grabs him and ''literally throws him back outside without a word''. Eventually, Mario ''begs'' Jeffy to just let him inside, which Jeffy refuses to do unless Mario gets him more chocolate cake. So Mario does get another chocolate cake... Which Mario hides in so that he can get inside. When Mario pops out of the cake, he chases Jeffy in a rage... And gets locked out ''again''. And of ''course'' it ends with him getting arrested and Jeffy getting off scott-free for his actions, because Logan ''refuses'' to freaking ''punish'' this kid for the awful things he does. This is honestly the video that cemented my absolute ''loathing'' of Jeffy as a character. He's nothing more than a braindead, unfunny little sociopath that exists for the sole purpose of making Mario's life a complete and utter nightmare, and he's ''well aware'' of that fact. I am very disappointed in Logan. I thought he would have known better after the last time he made a video where Mario was unfairly tormented because of Jeffy...



%%* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say i would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet...then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.

to:

%%* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say i would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet... then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.



* TropersWall/Sugarp1e1: The [[spoiler:''{{Film/Warcraft}}'']] entry of [[https://youtu.be/iDe5CkaUGho GameSpot's Worst Reviewed Movies of 2016]] rubbed me the wrong way. For the majority of the list, the narrator of this video spent a decent amount of time for each entry explaining why each movie is bad. [[spoiler:Nine Lives]] isn't funny, [[spoiler:The Do-Over]] is yet another braindead Adam Sandler comedy, [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] is just a rehash of the original, etc. But for the [[spoiler:Warcraft]] entry, they decide to just show a single clip of what they expected from the movie and compare it to multiple clips from the actual movie, with FlatWhat reactions thrown in-between, to make the classic "This is what we wanted, but this is what we got. Therefore it sucks" argument. While the argument itself isn't bad, the execution was just...lazy and weak. I know that they were trying to invoke the "It speaks for itself" argument and that if the person watching this video was a [[spoiler:WoW]] fan who agreed with GameSpot's opinion of the movie, it most likely would. But what about all the people who never played the game or watched the movie? If they're anything like me, they'd probably be confused as to why they think the movie is bad. What exactly were they trying to say? That the movie was boring? That it was silly? That it didn't feel the games it was adapted from? I'm just guessing here. Call me stupid, but I don't get it. I'm not saying they should've sat down and spelled it out to us, just that they could've explained why the movie is bad instead of just lazily pasting some clips together with little to no review. Also, in the [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] entry, they state that even Justin Bieber's [[spoiler:death scene]] couldn't save this movie. If the joke ended there, it'd okay. But instead they decide to shoehorn a clip of the infamous scene from CSI where Justin [[spoiler:is shot dead]], despite the fact that CSI has nothing to do with the topic of the list at hand. In other words, they used [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] as an excuse to pander to Justin Bieber's haters and make a "Justin Bieber must die" joke. That, to me, is the equivalent of making an "MC Hammer is broke" joke: an old joke that just isn't funny anymore.

to:

* TropersWall/Sugarp1e1: The [[spoiler:''{{Film/Warcraft}}'']] entry of [[https://youtu.be/iDe5CkaUGho GameSpot's Worst Reviewed Movies of 2016]] rubbed me the wrong way. For the majority of the list, the narrator of this video spent a decent amount of time for each entry explaining why each movie is bad. [[spoiler:Nine Lives]] isn't funny, [[spoiler:The Do-Over]] is yet another braindead Adam Sandler comedy, [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] is just a rehash of the original, etc. But for the [[spoiler:Warcraft]] entry, they decide to just show a single clip of what they expected from the movie and compare it to multiple clips from the actual movie, with FlatWhat reactions thrown in-between, to make the classic "This is what we wanted, but this is what we got. Therefore it sucks" argument. While the argument itself isn't bad, the execution was just... lazy and weak. I know that they were trying to invoke the "It speaks for itself" argument and that if the person watching this video was a [[spoiler:WoW]] fan who agreed with GameSpot's opinion of the movie, it most likely would. But what about all the people who never played the game or watched the movie? If they're anything like me, they'd probably be confused as to why they think the movie is bad. What exactly were they trying to say? That the movie was boring? That it was silly? That it didn't feel the games it was adapted from? I'm just guessing here. Call me stupid, but I don't get it. I'm not saying they should've sat down and spelled it out to us, just that they could've explained why the movie is bad instead of just lazily pasting some clips together with little to no review. Also, in the [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] entry, they state that even Justin Bieber's [[spoiler:death scene]] couldn't save this movie. If the joke ended there, it'd okay. But instead they decide to shoehorn a clip of the infamous scene from CSI where Justin [[spoiler:is shot dead]], despite the fact that CSI has nothing to do with the topic of the list at hand. In other words, they used [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] as an excuse to pander to Justin Bieber's haters and make a "Justin Bieber must die" joke. That, to me, is the equivalent of making an "MC Hammer is broke" joke: an old joke that just isn't funny anymore.
10th Jun '17 5:11:38 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/Rossmallo : IHateEverything 's "5 EPIC Ways To Be a YouTube Celebrity! ✔". It's bad enough that at a fair few times it's coming off as whining about the copyright issues he's going through. It's bad enough that he is so utterly openly hostile and confrontational to everything involved. It's bad enough that it's all said in such over the top smugness that it destroys his usual level headed tone. But no, what makes all of this utterly infuriating is "I hold nothing personally against any of the people mentioned, I guess". ....Yeah, no. He shows multiple examples of certain youtubers in the background, calls some out by name, and even insults one of the previously mentioned people in the outtro, after he's said this. While yes, some of the criticisms are valid, this whole bit at the end just makes it come off as "Fuck you, but not really." Either stand your ground and embrace the backlash or don't say it at all.

to:

* Tropers/Rossmallo : Tropers/Rossmallo: IHateEverything 's "5 EPIC Ways To Be a YouTube Celebrity! ✔". It's bad enough that at a fair few times it's coming off as whining about the copyright issues he's going through. It's bad enough that he is so utterly openly hostile and confrontational to everything involved. It's bad enough that it's all said in such over the top smugness that it destroys his usual level headed tone. But no, what makes all of this utterly infuriating is "I hold nothing personally against any of the people mentioned, I guess". ....guess"... Yeah, no. He shows multiple examples of certain youtubers in the background, calls some out by name, and even insults one of the previously mentioned people in the outtro, after he's said this. While yes, some of the criticisms are valid, this whole bit at the end just makes it come off as "Fuck you, but not really." Either stand your ground and embrace the backlash or don't say it at all.



** Troper/{{Awesomekid42}}: His response to said [=iDubbbzTV=] video was quite possibly the most embarrassing reaction to criticism I've ever seen from a youtuber. Disregarding how he acts as if the original video is meant to be an "exposed video" ([[SarcasmMode because clearly if somebody expresses not liking your content it means that they're trying to expose you]]) the majority of Leafy's video is filled with moments that are just painful to sit through, such as pretending that the chin joke was meant to be a serious point against him, acting as if needlessly long transitions being a small thing somehow means the issue doesn't exists ([[CriticalResearchFailure along with thinking that AIDS and ADHD are the same thing]] but I digress) acting as if criticizing him for not being funny is a worthless criticism by essentially saying "The Weather Channel isn't funny so it's shit" despite Calvin putting a focus on comedy in his videos so being unfunny would actually hurt the quality of the video, and trying to derail Idubzzz's points by taking shots at other videos made by Idubzzz (some several years prior to the original video) that doesn't affects the original criticisms in the slightest. A terrible video filled with points that added nothing of substance that only exists because he couldn't handle being criticized.

to:

** Troper/{{Awesomekid42}}: His response to said [=iDubbbzTV=] video was quite possibly the most embarrassing reaction to criticism I've ever seen from a youtuber. Disregarding how he acts as if the original video is meant to be an "exposed video" ([[SarcasmMode because clearly if somebody expresses not liking your content it means that they're trying to expose you]]) the majority of Leafy's video is filled with moments that are just painful to sit through, such as pretending that the chin joke was meant to be a serious point against him, acting as if needlessly long transitions being a small thing somehow means the issue doesn't exists ([[CriticalResearchFailure along with thinking that AIDS and ADHD are the same thing]] but I digress) acting as if criticizing him for not being funny is a worthless criticism by essentially saying "The Weather Channel isn't funny so it's shit" despite Calvin putting a focus on comedy in his videos so being unfunny would actually hurt the quality of the video, and trying to derail Idubzzz's points by taking shots at other videos made by Idubzzz (some several years prior to the original video) that doesn't affects affect the original criticisms in the slightest. A terrible video filled with points that added nothing of substance that only exists because he couldn't handle being criticized.
3rd Jun '17 6:15:40 PM Sakubara
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** [=Sakubara=]: Oh it gets worse! It turns out she is like this and had an intense falling out with Creator/JoshScorcher as documented in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcGcKh7hQWI& this reponse video]]. To make a long story short: after a long series of diagreements Josh cut ties to her at the realization she was verbally abusive and she made a video not only calling him among other things [[NoTrueScotsman not a real Marine]] and a neo-reactionary conservative (with the former is not close to true) and for those crimes '''[[DisproportionateRetribution he desires to die]]''' (yeah this makes the Tumblr joke from their corssover evern more HarsherInHindsight). And that's just Josh! She also downrighted targetted Ink Rose for not approving of a female [[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZelda Link]] by accusing her of being a closeted lesbian ([[InsaneTrollLogic how does that even work]]?) and her had her followers send mountains of lesbian porn featuring her and I Love Kim Possible's OCs to delibarletly drive her off the Internet. So yeah, if you haven't lost enough respect for Lily yet, watch the video.

to:

** [=Sakubara=]: Oh it gets worse! It turns out she is like this and had an intense falling out with Creator/JoshScorcher as documented in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcGcKh7hQWI& this reponse video]]. To make a long story short: after a long series of diagreements Josh cut ties to her at the realization she was verbally emotionally abusive and she made a video not only calling him among other things [[NoTrueScotsman not a real Marine]] and a neo-reactionary conservative (with the former (while he is conversative he's not close to true) a "neo-reactionary" ,but yet again she [[StrawmanPolitical hates all Republicans]]) and for those crimes '''[[DisproportionateRetribution he desires to die]]''' (yeah this makes the Tumblr joke from their corssover crossover evern more HarsherInHindsight). And that's just Josh! She also downrighted targetted Ink Rose for not approving of a female [[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZelda Link]] by accusing her of being a closeted lesbian ([[InsaneTrollLogic how does that even work]]?) and her had her followers send mountains of lesbian porn featuring her and I Love Kim Possible's OCs to delibarletly drive her off the Internet. So yeah, if you haven't lost enough respect for Lily yet, watch the video.
1st Jun '17 10:33:37 AM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


--> '''GoAnimate''': I'm gonna publish some [[DethroningMomentOfSuck Dethroning Moments of Suck]] while nobody is looking. [[EvilLaugh Hahahahaha.]] (''points ahead'')

to:

--> '''GoAnimate''': '''Website/GoAnimate''': I'm gonna publish some [[DethroningMomentOfSuck Dethroning Moments of Suck]] while nobody is looking. [[EvilLaugh Hahahahaha.]] (''points ahead'')


Added DiffLines:


--> '''[=TVTropes=]:''' OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH [=GoAnimate=] you would dare publish Dethroning Moments of Suck while no one is looking? You are grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded for 142561048293457294718275867291048 years! Now go to your room!\\
'''[=GoAnimate=]''': NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
29th May '17 8:09:02 AM Asue
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Troper/{{Asue}}: Their Wrongpurae of ''Sonic '06'' pretty much suffers from the same problems at the ''Other M'' one (barring the Sakamoto hate, which is replaced here by hating on almost every character in the game instead. [[SarcasmMode Much better.]]), with new ones as well: the Wrongpurae is cut in ''more than [[ArchivePanic 30 parts]]'' which makes the series drags on and on and on ''and on'' with, again, only Diabetus providing legitimate jokes while slowbeef can only express {{Angrish}} all the way. It's painful to look at it, especially when Let's Plays about this game were [[DeadHorseTrope done to death]] at this point, and there are much better alternatives to this one. [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking Also]], [[AwesomeMusic/SonicTheHedgehog the game's best part (the soundtrack)]] [[DudeNotFunny got mocked as well, just for mockery's sake]].

to:

** Troper/{{Asue}}: Their Wrongpurae of ''Sonic '06'' pretty much suffers from the same problems at the ''Other M'' one (barring the Sakamoto hate, which is replaced here by hating on almost every character in the game instead. [[SarcasmMode Much better.]]), with new ones as well: the Wrongpurae is cut in ''more than [[ArchivePanic 30 parts]]'' which makes the series [[ArcFatigue drags on and on and on on]] ''and on'' with, again, only Diabetus providing legitimate jokes while slowbeef can only express {{Angrish}} all the way. It's painful to look at it, especially when Let's Plays about this game were [[DeadHorseTrope done to death]] at this point, and there are much better alternatives to this one. [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking Also]], [[AwesomeMusic/SonicTheHedgehog the game's best part (the soundtrack)]] [[DudeNotFunny got mocked as well, just for mockery's sake]].
29th May '17 8:04:33 AM Asue
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Troper/{{Asue}}: Their Wrongpurae of ''Sonic '06'' pretty much suffers from the same problems at the ''Other M'' one (barring the Sakamoto hate, which is replaced here by hating on almost every character in the game instead. [[SarcasmMode Much better.), with new ones as well: the Wrongpurae is cut in ''more than [[ArchivePanic 30 parts]]'' which makes the series drags on and on and on ''and on'' with, again, only Diabetus providing legitimate jokes while slowbeef [[Angrish Angrishes]] all the way. It's painful to look at it, especially when Let's Plays about this game were [[DeadHorseTrope done to death]] at this point, and there are much better alternatives to this one. Also, [[AwesomeMusic/SonicTheHedgehog the game's best part (the soundtrack)]] [[DudeNotFunny got mocked as well, just for mockery's sake]].

to:

** Troper/{{Asue}}: Their Wrongpurae of ''Sonic '06'' pretty much suffers from the same problems at the ''Other M'' one (barring the Sakamoto hate, which is replaced here by hating on almost every character in the game instead. [[SarcasmMode Much better.), ]]), with new ones as well: the Wrongpurae is cut in ''more than [[ArchivePanic 30 parts]]'' which makes the series drags on and on and on ''and on'' with, again, only Diabetus providing legitimate jokes while slowbeef [[Angrish Angrishes]] can only express {{Angrish}} all the way. It's painful to look at it, especially when Let's Plays about this game were [[DeadHorseTrope done to death]] at this point, and there are much better alternatives to this one. Also, [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking Also]], [[AwesomeMusic/SonicTheHedgehog the game's best part (the soundtrack)]] [[DudeNotFunny got mocked as well, just for mockery's sake]].
29th May '17 7:58:50 AM Asue
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Troper/{{Asue}}: Their Wrongpurae of ''Sonic '06'' pretty much suffers from the same problems at the ''Other M'' one (barring the Sakamoto hate, which is replaced here by hating on almost every character in the game instead. [[SarcasmMode Much better.), with new ones as well: the Wrongpurae is cut in ''more than [[ArchivePanic 30 parts]]'' which makes the series drags on and on and on ''and on'' with, again, only Diabetus providing legitimate jokes while slowbeef [[Angrish Angrishes]] all the way. It's painful to look at it, especially when Let's Plays about this game were [[DeadHorseTrope done to death]] at this point, and there are much better alternatives to this one. Also, [[AwesomeMusic/SonicTheHedgehog the game's best part (the soundtrack)]] [[DudeNotFunny got mocked as well, just for mockery's sake]].
28th May '17 7:49:55 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: While I wasn't angry by his apology over his entry for "The Boys of Bummer", the fact that he hasn't rewriten his review for it like he promised and the fact that he was only motivated by DMOS entries in here makes his apology insincere and half-hearted, and that irks me a little. It reminds me of the time WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter "apologised" for the Twitter incident with [[WesternAnimation/SpongebobSquarepants Casey Alexander]].
28th May '17 6:35:15 AM DrZulu2010
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/DrZulu2010: I like ''WebVideo/WhatCultureWrestling'''s content, but the they handle Wrestling/JinderMahal's title victory at Backlash makes them act like the same [[SmartMark Smarks]] they were making fun of (especially Plumpy) but that's for another time. Instead I put the video on "Why Jinder Mahal will fails as a WWE Champion''. Not because of the video itself; I agree with most of Simon's case especially when it comes to not jumping the gun at calling him "the worst champion in the WWE" when his title reign just began but instead it's the title which is misleading and clickbaity. The biggest problem is that while Simon took a moment to truly say why Jinder's push might be risky as a business decision, he spends the rest of the video defending him and saying that with the correct way to be booked, he can bring a breath of fresh air to the promotion and mentioned how people already go on social media to condemn his push before it even started. This feels disjointed since, if more than anything, Simon wanted to play the devil's advocate (what the Why series serves for) but has to do something like this because his opinion is on the minority and he didn't want to upset the majority. I hope Jinder proves them wrong (though, being WWE, I also expect the worst) so What Culture can look themselves into a mirror and see how bad they have handled the situation in hindsight.
26th May '17 9:04:38 PM Sugarp1e1
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/{{alienhunter}}: I used to love watching LetsPlay/{{Markiplier}}, never missing a video that he uploaded. But ever since I watched his video on Bendy and the Ink Machine, I can't help but feel like he really is overreacting to everything, trying way too hard to be funny and pretending to be scared by everything, even if just a shadow. So whenever he gets around to finishing FiveNightsAtCandys 3, I don't know if I'll ever watch another video of his again without feeling like it's tainted.



* Tropers/Izzy1: To be honest, ''WebVideo/GradeAUnderA'''s video "THE YOUTUBERS COMPLAINING ABOUT DRAMA RANT (Exposing Matthew Santoro)" rubbed me the wrong way, specifically the part where he insulted LetsPlay/Markiplier. Now, before you make assumptions, I don't follow Markiplier or watch his stuff, but the fact that Grade was insulting him based on his appearance (having dyed red hair) and for calling himself "Markimoo" (which I heard is something his fans call him) rather than what he actually had to say was disappointing. And when he addressed this in his followup video saying that nobody is immune to criticism, I had 2 problems with that: 1. He was completely missing the point of why people were mad at him, for the most part, thinking that people were mad because Markiplier dyed his hair out of respect for a dead friend/charity (I heard both stories, don't know which is true) and saying he shouldn't be immune to criticism as a result, especially since Mark apparently caused more drama with his video. While I'm not sure if that's true, I think I can say that a lot of people, myself included, were more miffed about the way you attacked him for petty reasons, rather than that. 2. He makes a huge point about saying that everyone should be open to criticism, yet on [[https://np.reddit.com/r/GradeAUnderA/comments/4ht7fr/transparency_is_key_more_info_in_comments/ Reddit, he tried to delete a thread criticizing him for getting "annoyed" by it]]. Honestly, I was starting to like this guy's content, but these events turned me off from his videos.

to:

* Tropers/Izzy1: To be honest, ''WebVideo/GradeAUnderA'''s video "THE YOUTUBERS COMPLAINING ABOUT DRAMA RANT (Exposing Matthew Santoro)" rubbed me the wrong way, specifically the part where he insulted LetsPlay/Markiplier. Now, before you make assumptions, I don't follow Markiplier or watch his stuff, but the fact that Grade was insulting him based on his appearance (having dyed red hair) and for calling himself "Markimoo" (which I heard is something his fans call him) rather than what he actually had to say was disappointing. And when he addressed this in his followup video saying that nobody is immune to criticism, I had 2 problems with that: 1. He was completely missing the point of why people were mad at him, for the most part, thinking that people were mad because Markiplier dyed his hair hair, initially pink for charity and later red out of respect for a dead friend/charity (I heard both stories, don't know which is true) friend, and saying he shouldn't be immune to criticism as a result, especially since Mark apparently caused more drama with his video. While I'm not sure if that's true, I think I can say that a lot of people, myself included, were more miffed about the way you attacked him for petty reasons, rather than that. 2. He makes a huge point about saying that everyone should be open to criticism, yet on [[https://np.reddit.com/r/GradeAUnderA/comments/4ht7fr/transparency_is_key_more_info_in_comments/ Reddit, he tried to delete a thread criticizing him for getting "annoyed" by it]]. Honestly, I was starting to like this guy's content, but these events turned me off from his videos.



* Tropers/{{alienhunter}}: I used to love watching LetsPlay/{{Markiplier}}, never missing a video that he uploaded. But ever since I watched his video on Bendy and the Ink Machine, I can't help but feel like he really is overreacting to everything, trying way too hard to be funny and pretending to be scared by everything, even if just a shadow. So whenever he gets around to finishing FiveNightsAtCandys 3, I don't know if I'll ever watch another video of his again without feeling like it's tainted.
21st May '17 3:59:28 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Samuel: I am never a fan of CreepyPasta in my honest opinion. It either never appeals to me or certain stories are NightmareRetardant. The only fiction I actually did find enjoyable is WebVideo/MarbleHornets due to its realism. However, and I might get some flak for this, the one [[CreepyPasta pasta]] that really rubbed me the wrong way is WebOriginal/JeffTheKiller, which I find his image quite amusing. Anyway, I'd like to go ahead and add a [[DarthWiki/DethroningMomentOfSuck certain moment]]. Young Jeff is now horribly disfigured, but he thinks that his "new image" fits his personality. When acting strange, his mother asks the doctor if he is crazy. The doctor says that it's only natural for patients to act that way as a result of painkillers. [[WaynesWorld Excuse me? Baking powder]]? A patient acts very morbid, and yet the doctor suggests that's okay. For the sake of safety, when a patient like Jeff acts as such, leave him in the hospital! That is one of the worst moments I have ever read.

to:

* Samuel: I am never a fan of CreepyPasta in my honest opinion. It either never appeals to me or certain stories are NightmareRetardant. The only fiction I actually did find enjoyable is WebVideo/MarbleHornets due to its realism. However, and I might get some flak for this, the one [[CreepyPasta pasta]] that really rubbed me the wrong way is WebOriginal/JeffTheKiller, which I find his image quite amusing. Anyway, I'd like to go ahead and add a [[DarthWiki/DethroningMomentOfSuck certain moment]]. Young Jeff is now horribly disfigured, but he thinks that his "new image" fits his personality. When acting strange, his mother asks the doctor if he is crazy. The doctor says that it's only natural for patients to act that way as a result of painkillers. [[WaynesWorld [[Film/WaynesWorld Excuse me? Baking powder]]? A patient acts very morbid, and yet the doctor suggests that's okay. For the sake of safety, when a patient like Jeff acts as such, leave him in the hospital! That is one of the worst moments I have ever read.
19th May '17 12:45:56 PM legorunnerkid
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/legorunnerkid: The "My Open Letter to [[Music/GiIvaSunner SiIvaGunner]] video by Edgo while not an awful video I did have one problem with it. He is mad that SiIva is taking jabs at [[Creator/MikeMatei Mike Matei]] and that is apparently mean. I don't get this. For one, I doubt the people behind SiIvaGunner are that vicious at people. Sure, Mike is somewhat ashamed I guess but it isn't like SiIva is telling Mike to go kill himself or something like that. He also doesn't mention Loud Nigra and Misha which were both mocked a few times. He later made a comment about it but it is still jarring. [[Main/ArsonMurderAndJaywalking Also he compared SiIva to Leafy.]] I've seen where he was coming from and the video itself wasn't awful but it just felt like he didn't know how SiIvaGunner works.
18th May '17 7:57:14 PM IHateMyselfAndWantToDie
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/{{IHateMyselfAndWantToDie}}: A somewhat minor one, but Rocked's video "Regretting the Past: Chocolate Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water" really rubbed me the wrong way. So, a bit of context, the guy who runs the channel is an "old-school metalhead" who loves and worships the likes of Metallica, but hates bands like Limp Bizkit, Creed, Nickelback and really just any band with a large hate-base. He has this horrible tendency to bring up these bands just to insult them. And believe me, this isn't a problem relating to differing opinions, not at all. It's how often he does it, it's like, we get it. You don't like these bands. But anyway, back to today's focus, his review of Limp Bizkit's Chocolate Starfish. I do think that he made several valid criticisms, and I applaud him for giving credit where it's due. However, it's when he brings up the lyrical reference to Nine Inch Nails in Hot Dog, saying something along the lines of "if you're going to reference another band, at least make it a good one". This came out of nowhere, and is even more jarring when you consider he didn't even mention the references to Guns N' Roses and The Who in My Generation. It's a video about Limp Bizkit, if you're going to mention it, just do so and move on. If anything, get mad at Fred Durst for stealing lyrics. Add in other little problems like the always-hilarious gags of "it was so bad it knocked me out" and "minute of laughing from other people", hypocritically complaining about all the angst on the album and, as always, bringing up other bands that have nothing to do with the video, just to put them down, and you can see my issue.
13th May '17 3:54:00 PM Sakubara
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** [=Sakubara=]: Oh it gets worse! It turns out she is like this and had an intense falling out with Creator/JoshScorcher as documented in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcGcKh7hQWI& this reponse video]]. To make a long story short: after a long series of diagreements Josh cut ties to her at the realization she was verbally abusive and she made a video not only calling him among other things [[NoTrueScotsman not a real Marine]] and a neo-reactionary conservative (with the former is not close to true) and for those crimes '''[[DisproportionateRetribution he desires to die]]''' (yeah this makes the Tumblr joke from their corssover evern more HarsherInHindsight). And that's just Josh! She also downrighted targetted Ink Rose for not approving of a female [[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZelda Link]] by accusing her of being a closeted lesbian ([[InsaneTrollLogic how does that even work]]?) and her had her followers send mountains of Yuri art featuring her and I Love Kim Possible. So yeah, if you haven't lost enough respect for Lily yet, watch the video.

to:

** [=Sakubara=]: Oh it gets worse! It turns out she is like this and had an intense falling out with Creator/JoshScorcher as documented in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcGcKh7hQWI& this reponse video]]. To make a long story short: after a long series of diagreements Josh cut ties to her at the realization she was verbally abusive and she made a video not only calling him among other things [[NoTrueScotsman not a real Marine]] and a neo-reactionary conservative (with the former is not close to true) and for those crimes '''[[DisproportionateRetribution he desires to die]]''' (yeah this makes the Tumblr joke from their corssover evern more HarsherInHindsight). And that's just Josh! She also downrighted targetted Ink Rose for not approving of a female [[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZelda Link]] by accusing her of being a closeted lesbian ([[InsaneTrollLogic how does that even work]]?) and her had her followers send mountains of Yuri art lesbian porn featuring her and I Love Kim Possible.Possible's OCs to delibarletly drive her off the Internet. So yeah, if you haven't lost enough respect for Lily yet, watch the video.
13th May '17 3:38:43 PM Sakubara
Is there an issue? Send a Message
13th May '17 3:38:41 PM Sakubara
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** [=Sakubara=]: Oh it gets worse! It turns out she is like this and had an intense falling out with Creator/JoshScorcher as documented in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcGcKh7hQWI& this reponse video]]. To make a long story short: after a long series of diagreements Josh cut ties to her at the realization she was verbally abusive and she made a video not only calling him among other things [[NoTrueScottsman not a true Marine] and a neo-reactionary conservative (while the former is not close to true) and for those crimes '''[[FelonyMisdeamonr he desires to die]]''' (yeah this makes the Tumblr joke from their corssover evern more HarsherInHindsight). And that's just Josh! She also downrighted targetted Ink Rose for not approving of a female [[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZelda Link]] by accusing her of being a closeted lesbian ([[InsaneTrollLogic how does that even work]]?) and her had her followers send mountains of Yuri art featuring her and I Love Kim Possible. So yeah, if you haven't lost enough respect for Lily yet, watch the video.

to:

** [=Sakubara=]: Oh it gets worse! It turns out she is like this and had an intense falling out with Creator/JoshScorcher as documented in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcGcKh7hQWI& this reponse video]]. To make a long story short: after a long series of diagreements Josh cut ties to her at the realization she was verbally abusive and she made a video not only calling him among other things [[NoTrueScottsman [[NoTrueScotsman not a true Marine] real Marine]] and a neo-reactionary conservative (while (with the former is not close to true) and for those crimes '''[[FelonyMisdeamonr '''[[DisproportionateRetribution he desires to die]]''' (yeah this makes the Tumblr joke from their corssover evern more HarsherInHindsight). And that's just Josh! She also downrighted targetted Ink Rose for not approving of a female [[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZelda Link]] by accusing her of being a closeted lesbian ([[InsaneTrollLogic how does that even work]]?) and her had her followers send mountains of Yuri art featuring her and I Love Kim Possible. So yeah, if you haven't lost enough respect for Lily yet, watch the video.
13th May '17 3:36:13 PM Sakubara
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** [=Sakubara=]: Oh it gets worse! It turns out she is like this and had an intense falling out with Creator/JoshScorcher as documented in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcGcKh7hQWI& this reponse video]]. To make a long story short: after a long series of diagreements Josh cut ties to her at the realization she was verbally abusive and she made a video not only calling him among other things [[NoTrueScottsman not a true Marine] and a neo-reactionary conservative (while the former is not close to true) and for those crimes '''[[FelonyMisdeamonr he desires to die]]''' (yeah this makes the Tumblr joke from their corssover evern more HarsherInHindsight). And that's just Josh! She also downrighted targetted Ink Rose for not approving of a female [[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZelda Link]] by accusing her of being a closeted lesbian ([[InsaneTrollLogic how does that even work]]?) and her had her followers send mountains of Yuri art featuring her and I Love Kim Possible. So yeah, if you haven't lost enough respect for Lily yet, watch the video.
10th May '17 6:28:00 PM GrammarNavi
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/{{Phobosong}}: Voice of Reason's "Balanced Perspective" of the first Equestria Girls with ToonkriticY2k and Past Analysis is a mess, and shows every overused and flimsy argument against the movie, and quite frankly, the problems that plague the MLP analysis community (mind you, this is coming from someone who wasn't even ''that'' big of a fan of the first one, and knew it had plenty of flaws). Even if you don't like EquestriaGirls, it's clear he has a massive BiasStreamroller against it, especially when he mentions how high the movie would be on his "Top Ten Worst MLP Episodes" if it were an episode. One particularly bad part is when, upon hearing that the movie didn't have ''that'' much fanservice, throws in a bunch of references to the show such as Pinkie's party cannon line and a powered up Rainbow taking Scootaloo for a ride in the party as a sort of "take that". While one could argue that there was some fanservice (the Derpy in the credits is a good example), it's really presumptuous to assume that every single one of those references is just "pandering". Believe it or not, VoR, sometimes, writers just want to make little references to past things done by themselves or by other writers on this show they've been working on. But no, just assume that that party cannon line was made just to appease bronies, and not a fun, ironic joke McCarthy was making that referenced an older episode of hers. Just assume that scene of Rainbow flying with Scootaloo is fanservice, and not just a little nod to how Rainbow and Scootaloo had just gotten a nice friendship in the show. Just assume everything's about you and other bronies. There's other flaws, like scoffing at the idea that Sunset's defeat was a nice tribute to Nightmare Moon's defeat, saying it was just a rehash. This completely ignores the thematic reasons for this similarity: both Sunset and NM had feelings of anger and resentment, turned to magic, and were suddenly taken over by something powerful and evil, only to be freed from their monstrous torment by the Elements of Harmony. ''Of course'' they'd be similar. But, like many reviewers, he seemed to completely miss that Sunset was shocked by her transformation, or rather, he couldn't be bothered to notice that, and what that said about her character. For something called a "Balanced Perspective", VoR's biased, obnoxious review takes up the spotlight, he has absolutely no intention on being balanced or fair himself, and it ''really'' hurts the review to an infuriating degree.

to:

* Tropers/{{Phobosong}}: Voice of Reason's "Balanced Perspective" of the first Equestria Girls with ToonkriticY2k and Past Analysis is a mess, and shows every overused and flimsy argument against the movie, and quite frankly, the problems that plague the MLP analysis community (mind you, this is coming from someone who wasn't even ''that'' big of a fan of the first one, and knew it had plenty of flaws). Even if you don't like EquestriaGirls, it's clear he has a massive BiasStreamroller against it, especially when he mentions how high the movie would be on his "Top Ten Worst MLP Episodes" if it were an episode. One particularly bad part is when, upon hearing that the movie didn't have ''that'' much fanservice, throws in a bunch of references to the show such as Pinkie's party cannon line and a powered up Rainbow taking Scootaloo for a ride in the party as a sort of "take that". While one could argue that there was some fanservice (the Derpy in the credits is a good example), it's really presumptuous to assume that every single one of those references is just "pandering". Believe it or not, VoR, [=VoR=], sometimes, writers just want to make little references to past things done by themselves or by other writers on this show they've been working on. But no, just assume that that party cannon line was made just to appease bronies, and not a fun, ironic joke McCarthy [=McCarthy=] was making that referenced an older episode of hers. Just assume that scene of Rainbow flying with Scootaloo is fanservice, and not just a little nod to how Rainbow and Scootaloo had just gotten a nice friendship in the show. Just assume everything's about you and other bronies. There's other flaws, like scoffing at the idea that Sunset's defeat was a nice tribute to Nightmare Moon's defeat, saying it was just a rehash. This completely ignores the thematic reasons for this similarity: both Sunset and NM had feelings of anger and resentment, turned to magic, and were suddenly taken over by something powerful and evil, only to be freed from their monstrous torment by the Elements of Harmony. ''Of course'' they'd be similar. But, like many reviewers, he seemed to completely miss that Sunset was shocked by her transformation, or rather, he couldn't be bothered to notice that, and what that said about her character. For something called a "Balanced Perspective", VoR's [=VoR's=] biased, obnoxious review takes up the spotlight, he has absolutely no intention on being balanced or fair himself, and it ''really'' hurts the review to an infuriating degree.
9th May '17 6:06:00 AM Awesomekid42
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* fluffything: I enjoy watching [=LPs=] on [[PeanutButterGamer PBG Gaming]] on youtube. Not all of them are gems, but they're still enjoyable. That is, until "Part 32" of his [[SelfImposedChallenge Nuzlocke Challenge]] for ''[[VideoGame/PokemonRubyAndSapphire Pokémon Alpha Sapphire]]''. Good lord, what a train wreck. For one thing, he spends several minutes of the video consistently pointing out how he needs to level up his Pokemon to fight Kyogre (Which, I might add, he constantly mispronounces as "Kee-Oh-Gray" instead of "Kai-Oh-Gur") only to jump cut to his Pokemon already leveled up. I know it's boring to watch people level grind in video games. But, then, why make such a big deal about having to level up if there's just going to be a jump cut anyway? All it does is waste the viewer's time. Then, after he levels up, he goes to face off against Kyogre. Does he attempt to capture it? Nope. Instead, he just immediately makes it faint and treats it like a victory. Now, before anyone points out that maybe PBG is just doing a "No Legendaries" run, I'd like to remind everyone of something. One of his main Pokemon is Lawfanda. Lawfanda is a Latias. Latias is, you guessed it, a Legendary. Plus, PBG had a Master Ball at the time, so he could've easily caught Kyogre without any hassle. He essentially could've easily captured a very powerful and useful Pokemon but instead made it faint for no good reason. So, to summarize, the video was essentially just one big waste of time.

to:

* fluffything: I enjoy watching [=LPs=] on [[PeanutButterGamer PBG Gaming]] on youtube. Not all of them are gems, but they're still enjoyable. That is, until "Part 32" of his [[SelfImposedChallenge Nuzlocke Challenge]] for ''[[VideoGame/PokemonRubyAndSapphire Pokémon Alpha Sapphire]]''. Good lord, what a train wreck. For one thing, he spends several minutes of the video consistently pointing out how he needs to level up his Pokemon to fight Kyogre (Which, I might add, he constantly mispronounces as "Kee-Oh-Gray" instead of "Kai-Oh-Gur") only to jump cut to his Pokemon already leveled up. I know it's boring to watch people level grind in video games. But, then, why make such a big deal about having to level up if there's just going to be a jump cut anyway? All it does is waste the viewer's time. Then, after he levels up, he goes to face off against Kyogre. Does he attempt to capture it? Nope. Instead, he just immediately makes it faint and treats it like a victory. Now, before anyone points out that maybe PBG is just doing a "No Legendaries" run, I'd like to remind everyone of something. One of his main Pokemon is Lawfanda. Lawfanda is a Latias. Latias is, you guessed it, a Legendary. Plus, PBG had a Master Ball at the time, so he could've easily caught Kyogre without any hassle. He essentially could've easily captured a very powerful and useful Pokemon but instead made it faint for no good reason. So, to summarize, the video was essentially just one big waste of time.
6th May '17 4:47:43 AM CaptainTedium
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/CaptainTedium: One of the many things on the Internet I am addicted to are cartoon conspiracy theories, mainly because they're fun to read or hear about even when they're clearly a load of bunk. The worst video consisting of a list of cartoon conspiracy theories I've ever watched, however, would be adamsmasher's four-part Top 100 Cartoon Conspiracy Theories video. There were a lot of flaws, but the absolute worst thing about this four-part video was that several entries weren't even cartoon conspiracy theories at all and instead consisted of adamsmasher complaining about [[NostalgiaFilter modern cartoons being inferior to older ones]]. It's true that everyone's entitled to their opinion, but adamsmasher wasn't helping his case when he insisted that people who liked today's cartoons [[FanHater were immature twelve-year-olds]], and complaining about modern shows really has nothing to do with cartoon conspiracy theories at all. Whether he couldn't find 100 interesting cartoon conspiracy theories or just felt like bashing people who liked what he didn't like, there really was no reason for him to kvetch about modern cartoons being terrible and it was especially appalling that he'd have the gall to generalize everyone who doesn't share his opinion.

to:

* Tropers/CaptainTedium: One of the many things on the Internet I am addicted to are cartoon conspiracy theories, mainly because they're fun to read or hear about even when they're clearly a load of bunk. The worst video consisting of a list of cartoon conspiracy theories I've ever watched, however, would be adamsmasher's four-part Top 100 Cartoon Conspiracy Theories video. There were a lot of flaws, but the absolute worst thing about this four-part video was that several entries weren't even cartoon conspiracy theories at all and instead consisted of adamsmasher complaining about [[NostalgiaFilter modern cartoons being inferior to older ones]]. It's true that everyone's entitled to their opinion, but adamsmasher wasn't helping his case when he insisted that people who liked today's cartoons [[FanHater were immature twelve-year-olds]], and complaining about modern shows really has nothing to do with cartoon conspiracy theories at all. Whether he couldn't find 100 interesting cartoon conspiracy theories or just felt like bashing people who liked what he didn't like, there really was no reason for him to kvetch about modern cartoons being terrible and it was especially appalling that he'd have the gall to generalize make a hasty generalization of everyone who doesn't share his opinion.
5th May '17 5:37:21 AM Cryoclaste
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* fluffything: I enjoy watching [=LPs=] on [[PeanutButterGamer PBG Gaming]] on youtube. Not all of them are gems, but they're still enjoyable. That is, until "Part 32" of his [[SelfImposedChallenge Nuzlocke Challenge]] for ''{{Pokemon}} Alpha Sapphire''. Good lord, what a train wreck. For one thing, he spends several minutes of the video consistently pointing out how he needs to level up his Pokemon to fight Kyogre (Which, I might add, he constantly mispronounces as "Kee-Oh-Gray" instead of "Kai-Oh-Gur") only to jump cut to his Pokemon already leveled up. I know it's boring to watch people level grind in video games. But, then, why make such a big deal about having to level up if there's just going to be a jump cut anyway? All it does is waste the viewer's time. Then, after he levels up, he goes to face off against Kyogre. Does he attempt to capture it? Nope. Instead, he just immediately makes it faint and treats it like a victory. Now, before anyone points out that maybe PBG is just doing a "No Legendaries" run, I'd like to remind everyone of something. One of his main Pokemon is Lawfanda. Lawfanda is a Latias. Latias is, you guessed it, a Legendary. Plus, PBG had a Master Ball at the time, so he could've easily caught Kyogre without any hassle. He essentially could've easily captured a very powerful and useful Pokemon but instead made it faint for no good reason. So, to summarize, the video was essentially just one big waste of time.

to:

* fluffything: I enjoy watching [=LPs=] on [[PeanutButterGamer PBG Gaming]] on youtube. Not all of them are gems, but they're still enjoyable. That is, until "Part 32" of his [[SelfImposedChallenge Nuzlocke Challenge]] for ''{{Pokemon}} ''[[VideoGame/PokemonRubyAndSapphire Pokémon Alpha Sapphire''.Sapphire]]''. Good lord, what a train wreck. For one thing, he spends several minutes of the video consistently pointing out how he needs to level up his Pokemon to fight Kyogre (Which, I might add, he constantly mispronounces as "Kee-Oh-Gray" instead of "Kai-Oh-Gur") only to jump cut to his Pokemon already leveled up. I know it's boring to watch people level grind in video games. But, then, why make such a big deal about having to level up if there's just going to be a jump cut anyway? All it does is waste the viewer's time. Then, after he levels up, he goes to face off against Kyogre. Does he attempt to capture it? Nope. Instead, he just immediately makes it faint and treats it like a victory. Now, before anyone points out that maybe PBG is just doing a "No Legendaries" run, I'd like to remind everyone of something. One of his main Pokemon is Lawfanda. Lawfanda is a Latias. Latias is, you guessed it, a Legendary. Plus, PBG had a Master Ball at the time, so he could've easily caught Kyogre without any hassle. He essentially could've easily captured a very powerful and useful Pokemon but instead made it faint for no good reason. So, to summarize, the video was essentially just one big waste of time.
27th Apr '17 10:34:58 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the final nail on HTF's coffin for me), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, Flippy in my opinion is nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all, and gives other bears (both fictional and real) a bad name. After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! And it was one of the first times I wanted to strangle a fictional character. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.

to:

** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]].surely in the top 5. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the final nail on HTF's coffin for me), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, Flippy in my opinion is nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all, and gives other bears (both fictional and real) a bad name. After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! And it was one of the first times I wanted to strangle a fictional character. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.
27th Apr '17 7:10:46 AM Sugarp1e1
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Sugarp1e1: I didn't appreciate the seventh entry of Website/ScrewAttack's [[https://youtu.be/fZuki3QTb2s Top 10 Worst Cartoons Based on Video Games list]]; [[spoiler:BlazBlue: Alter Memory.]] It's not the fact that Nervous Nick doesn't like [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] that's the problem (I've never even played the game or watched the anime). As with my PhantomStrider entry above, my problem with this list is his reason for putting it on the list as well as his elitist attitude about the whole thing. He starts the entry off by making it clear that he doesn't like the game's world or story, having a very PlayTheGameSkipTheStory attitude about it. Okay, fine. But judging by the clips of the anime he used, [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is actually a pretty faithful adaptation. So why is it bad according to Nick? [[BiasSteamroller Because it's a faithful adaptation of a game he never liked to begin with.]] His bias behind this is clear, what with him spending the entire entry summarizing the story in way that makes it sound even more confusing than it really is (instead of just explaining why he finds it confusing) and ending the entry with him absolutely losing his [[PrecisionFStrike shit]] over how much he hates [[spoiler:BlazBlue]]'s story (especially the whole [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] plot point), claiming "I see [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] for what it really is! It's a mess! I hate it! That's why it's #7." Um, Nick? [[OpinionMyopia Are you implying that the people who do like the story are idiotic sheep?]] To me, it sounds like he's genuinely proclaiming himself to be [[FanHater better than the fans]] because he can't get past the story. Don't get me wrong; I totally agree that the [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] is confusing, especially at the end when [[spoiler:the cycle is finally broken]], but I wouldn't yell at my audience that "The story sucks!" in a way that suggests my subjective opinion is objective fact. And considering how he goes from screaming his lungs out to calmly moving on to #6, it was PlayedForLaughs. You probably also noticed that this DMOS sounds more like I'm talking about the game and not the anime. Nick's tirade was the same way. On top of all that, [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking #7 was the only entry on the list that wasn't an adaptation of a game he liked.]] If he never liked [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] to begin with, then he's in no position to tell us that [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is a bad adaptation just because it's faithful to the source material.

to:

* Sugarp1e1: TroperWall/Sugarp1e1: I didn't appreciate the seventh entry of Website/ScrewAttack's [[https://youtu.be/fZuki3QTb2s Top 10 Worst Cartoons Based on Video Games list]]; [[spoiler:BlazBlue: Alter Memory.]] It's not the fact that Nervous Nick doesn't like [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] that's the problem (I've never even played the game or watched the anime). As with my PhantomStrider entry above, my problem with this list is his reason for putting it on the list as well as his elitist attitude about the whole thing. He starts the entry off by making it clear that he doesn't like the game's world or story, having a very PlayTheGameSkipTheStory attitude about it. Okay, fine. But judging by the clips of the anime he used, [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is actually a pretty faithful adaptation. So why is it bad according to Nick? [[BiasSteamroller Because it's a faithful adaptation of a game he never liked to begin with.]] His bias behind this is clear, what with him spending the entire entry summarizing the story in way that makes it sound even more confusing than it really is (instead of just explaining why he finds it confusing) and ending the entry with him absolutely losing his [[PrecisionFStrike shit]] over how much he hates [[spoiler:BlazBlue]]'s story (especially the whole [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] plot point), claiming "I see [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] for what it really is! It's a mess! I hate it! That's why it's #7." Um, Nick? [[OpinionMyopia Are you implying that the people who do like the story are idiotic sheep?]] To me, it sounds like he's genuinely proclaiming himself to be [[FanHater better than the fans]] because he can't get past the story. Don't get me wrong; I totally agree that the [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] is confusing, especially at the end when [[spoiler:the cycle is finally broken]], but I wouldn't yell at my audience that "The story sucks!" in a way that suggests my subjective opinion is objective fact. And considering how he goes from screaming his lungs out to calmly moving on to #6, it was PlayedForLaughs. You probably also noticed that this DMOS sounds more like I'm talking about the game and not the anime. Nick's tirade was the same way. On top of all that, [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking #7 was the only entry on the list that wasn't an adaptation of a game he liked.]] If he never liked [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] to begin with, then he's in no position to tell us that [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is a bad adaptation just because it's faithful to the source material.



** Sugarp1e1: Another commentator by the name of Doodletones has commentated on videos against Mr. Enter before (defending him despite not liking him anymore) and the way she sums up those videos can be applied here; "Mr. Enter is wrong because he's Mr. Enter". Seriously, it feels like this guy is only bad-mouthing these shows because Mr. Enter likes them and nothing else. Sure, he tries to argue, but his aruguments boil down to "I don't like these shows, therefore they're overrated bullshit". And that's ignoring the hypocrisy. He gets on Enter's case for being immature, yet he judges ''Steven Universe'' solely on the worst of its fanbase alone. I'm not even a big fan of Mr. Enter (who is, at best, a GuiltyPleasure of mine), and this still bothered me.

to:

** Sugarp1e1: TroperWall/Sugarp1e1: Another commentator by the name of Doodletones has commentated on videos against Mr. Enter before (defending him despite not liking him anymore) and the way she sums up those videos can be applied here; "Mr. Enter is wrong because he's Mr. Enter". Seriously, it feels like this guy is only bad-mouthing these shows because Mr. Enter likes them and nothing else. Sure, he tries to argue, but his aruguments boil down to "I don't like these shows, therefore they're overrated bullshit". And that's ignoring the hypocrisy. He gets on Enter's case for being immature, yet he judges ''Steven Universe'' solely on the worst of its fanbase alone. I'm not even a big fan of Mr. Enter (who is, at best, a GuiltyPleasure of mine), and this still bothered me.



* Sugarp1e1: The [[spoiler:''{{Film/Warcraft}}'']] entry of [[https://youtu.be/iDe5CkaUGho GameSpot's Worst Reviewed Movies of 2016]] rubbed me the wrong way. For the majority of the list, the narrator of this video spent a decent amount of time for each entry explaining why each movie is bad. [[spoiler:Nine Lives]] isn't funny, [[spoiler:The Do-Over]] is yet another braindead Adam Sandler comedy, [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] is just a rehash of the original, etc. But for the [[spoiler:Warcraft]] entry, they decide to just show a single clip of what they expected from the movie and compare it to multiple clips from the actual movie, with FlatWhat reactions thrown in-between, to make the classic "This is what we wanted, but this is what we got. Therefore it sucks" argument. While the argument itself isn't bad, the execution was just...lazy and weak. I know that they were trying to invoke the "It speaks for itself" argument and that if the person watching this video was a [[spoiler:WoW]] fan who agreed with GameSpot's opinion of the movie, it most likely would. But what about all the people who never played the game or watched the movie? If they're anything like me, they'd probably be confused as to why they think the movie is bad. What exactly were they trying to say? That the movie was boring? That it was silly? That it didn't feel the games it was adapted from? I'm just guessing here. Call me stupid, but I don't get it. I'm not saying they should've sat down and spelled it out to us, just that they could've explained why the movie is bad instead of just lazily pasting some clips together with little to no review. Also, in the [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] entry, they state that even Justin Bieber's [[spoiler:death scene]] couldn't save this movie. If the joke ended there, it'd okay. But instead they decide to shoehorn a clip of the infamous scene from CSI where Justin [[spoiler:is shot dead]], despite the fact that CSI has nothing to do with the topic of the list at hand. In other words, they used [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] as an excuse to pander to Justin Bieber's haters and make a "Justin Bieber must die" joke. That, to me, is the equivalent of making an "MC Hammer is broke" joke: an old joke that just isn't funny anymore.

to:

* Sugarp1e1: TropersWall/Sugarp1e1: The [[spoiler:''{{Film/Warcraft}}'']] entry of [[https://youtu.be/iDe5CkaUGho GameSpot's Worst Reviewed Movies of 2016]] rubbed me the wrong way. For the majority of the list, the narrator of this video spent a decent amount of time for each entry explaining why each movie is bad. [[spoiler:Nine Lives]] isn't funny, [[spoiler:The Do-Over]] is yet another braindead Adam Sandler comedy, [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] is just a rehash of the original, etc. But for the [[spoiler:Warcraft]] entry, they decide to just show a single clip of what they expected from the movie and compare it to multiple clips from the actual movie, with FlatWhat reactions thrown in-between, to make the classic "This is what we wanted, but this is what we got. Therefore it sucks" argument. While the argument itself isn't bad, the execution was just...lazy and weak. I know that they were trying to invoke the "It speaks for itself" argument and that if the person watching this video was a [[spoiler:WoW]] fan who agreed with GameSpot's opinion of the movie, it most likely would. But what about all the people who never played the game or watched the movie? If they're anything like me, they'd probably be confused as to why they think the movie is bad. What exactly were they trying to say? That the movie was boring? That it was silly? That it didn't feel the games it was adapted from? I'm just guessing here. Call me stupid, but I don't get it. I'm not saying they should've sat down and spelled it out to us, just that they could've explained why the movie is bad instead of just lazily pasting some clips together with little to no review. Also, in the [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] entry, they state that even Justin Bieber's [[spoiler:death scene]] couldn't save this movie. If the joke ended there, it'd okay. But instead they decide to shoehorn a clip of the infamous scene from CSI where Justin [[spoiler:is shot dead]], despite the fact that CSI has nothing to do with the topic of the list at hand. In other words, they used [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] as an excuse to pander to Justin Bieber's haters and make a "Justin Bieber must die" joke. That, to me, is the equivalent of making an "MC Hammer is broke" joke: an old joke that just isn't funny anymore.



** Tropers/{{Sugarp1e1}}: I agree. What especially ticks me off about this video is hotdiggitydemon feeling the need to AccentuateTheNegative despite finding the reboot SoOkayItsAverage. Which is it? Is it average or is it bad? There's a difference, you know.

to:

** Tropers/{{Sugarp1e1}}: TroperWall/Sugarp1e1: I agree. What especially ticks me off about this video is hotdiggitydemon feeling the need to AccentuateTheNegative despite finding the reboot SoOkayItsAverage. Which is it? Is it average or is it bad? There's a difference, you know.



* Tropers/{{Sugarp1e1}}: The 7th entry of WebVideo/TheMetalBlade5's [[https://youtu.be/LUy-iKZDeNk Top 10 Worst Video Game Reviews I've Seen list]]. In the beginning of the video, he claims that he has no problem with people liking something he doesn't and that he was only going to focus on the reviews themselves. Yet when he gets to his 7th entry, he starts going on this long rant about how [[spoiler:Shadow of Memories]] is an objectively bad game and how everyone who gave it a positive review is wrong. This entry felt more like a review on the game than a review on the reviews it got. And the hypocrisy gets worse at the end of the video when he tells the narrator of the #1 review on the list that he should respect people's opinions on the game. I don't know about you, but telling people their objectively wrong for liking something you don't isn't respecting their opinion. [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking Also, his yelling literally gave me a headache]].

to:

* Tropers/{{Sugarp1e1}}: TroperWall/Sugarp1e1: The 7th entry of WebVideo/TheMetalBlade5's [[https://youtu.be/LUy-iKZDeNk Top 10 Worst Video Game Reviews I've Seen list]]. In the beginning of the video, he claims that he has no problem with people liking something he doesn't and that he was only going to focus on the reviews themselves. Yet when he gets to his 7th entry, he starts going on this long rant about how [[spoiler:Shadow of Memories]] is an objectively bad game and how everyone who gave it a positive review is wrong. This entry felt more like a review on the game than a review on the reviews it got. And the hypocrisy gets worse at the end of the video when he tells the narrator of the #1 review on the list that he should respect people's opinions on the game. I don't know about you, but telling people their objectively wrong for liking something you don't isn't respecting their opinion. [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking Also, his yelling literally gave me a headache]].
27th Apr '17 6:57:48 AM Sugarp1e1
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/Sugarp1e1: PhantomStrider (real name: Josh Strider) is a CausticCritic from Australia who is often described as a less angry, more forgiving [[TheMysteriousMrEnter Mysterious Mr. Enter]] with better editing. Unlike most [[CausticCritic Caustic Critics]] however, he does almost all of his reviews in the form of lists. He's also pretty humble, admitting to being biased at times and making it clear in all of the intros to his videos that he's not a FanHater (As you can see in the flavor text). But the former didn't become more blatantly obvious than in his [[https://youtu.be/-0MxCQmlmmE Top 10 Worst Cartoon Remakes list]]. It was pretty good for the most part. There's just three things I didn't like and/or understand. 1) I'm confused as to how the [[spoiler:Powerpuff Girls]] reboot wasn't at #10 considering he was the least critical of it compared to the others on the list. 2) I didn't really understand the TakeThat against the trailer for the new Ghostbusters movie. I know that the all-female cast didn't get a very warm welcome, but if there's one thing I know, it's that [[NeverTrustATrailer trailers can't be trusted]]. You don't know if the movie gonna be good regardless of the cast or not. But the DMoS for me is his #1 pick: [[spoiler:every single Franchise/ScoobyDoo remake in existence]]! Look, I don't care if he doesn't like [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]]; that's his opinion. But his reason behind his #1 pick shows just how biased he can be. Strider's criticisms about [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] are legitimate, if debatable (he found the show formulaic, boring and "nothing special"), but his only criticism about all of the remakes that followed was basically "The original was never any good to begin with, so the franchise should have died years ago!" In his defense, if I remember correctly, I think he did mention at some point that he doesn't feel like any of the remakes added anything new or interesting to the series. But even if he did, it was completely overshadowed by his rant about how annoyed he is that the franchise is still going after 40 years despite the original's lack of appeal to him. I totally understand where he's coming from; I get pretty surprised myself when I find out something that came out when I was a kid is still going on to this day, especially if it's a show I don't like. But I wouldn't be so annoyed as to place the entire franchise at #1 on a Worst Remakes list and bash it simply because of it's lifespan and the quality of the original alone. Not to mention that he seems to think that [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] is, like the other remakes he mentions, exactly the same as the original. Oh, and Strider seemed to have [[TookALevelInJerkass taken a level in jerkass]] for this entry. Usually, he just expresses his distaste in a professional and witty manner like the classy DeadpanSnarker he is. Here it sounds more like he's trying to rally all of his viewers against the franchise, what with him having the gall to assume that nobody actively watches [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] anyway, asking "Has any kid ever sat down and said, 'Oh, look! [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] is on!'?", and claiming that kids only watch it when there's nothing better to watch. Excuse me Strider, but I watched both [[spoiler: What's New, Scooby-Doo?]] and [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] regularly when I was a kid and loved them. Again, this is coming from a guy who claims to be fine with people liking something he doesn't. This assumption is not only hypocritical and insulting, it makes no sense. If a series has been remade over 19 times, then it must have some sort of fanbase otherwise it wouldn't have been remade even once! Even worse? In his [[https://youtu.be/IlkvxV1laO8 Top 10 Best Disney Movies list]], he references the angry comments he got from this in a gag where he calmly says "[[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] kinda... sucks?" before being pelted by tomatoes. As if he was being totally reasonable with his decision and the viewers were the ones being ridiculous! Can someone please remind him that he specifically described his #2 pick, [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], as "the devil's anus of bad"? If he thinks [[spoiler:the entire Scooby-Doo franchise]] is even worse than [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], then "it kinda sucks" isn't even close to what he was saying. Not only that, but judging by Strider's comment about [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/N95f7baE0as?list=PLfji1gVKy4fYaePq-q1ox2S24X8VZbelZ Top 10 Worst Cartoon Live Action Remakes list]], he seems to think that the only people who are mad at him for this are the [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] fans. Implying that he genuinely believes that all of those angry comments were from the FanDumb as opposed to some belonging to those who saw just how biased he was being. I was so disappointed with him, I couldn't bring myself to listen to him re-explain why he hates [[spoiler:Scooby Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/P9NLefklYK8 Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes list]] and skipped over it. (But judging by his added comment of "Forever" in the entry title, he was trying to justify cramming the entire franchise on the top spot of his Worst Remakes list). I don't believe in Unsubscribing, so I'll continue to watch his videos. But you'd think somebody who claims to enjoy engaging in intelligent conversation would have a better reason for his #1 pick than "there's too many remakes".

to:

* Tropers/Sugarp1e1: TroperWall/Sugarp1e1: PhantomStrider (real name: Josh Strider) is a CausticCritic from Australia who is often described as a less angry, more forgiving [[TheMysteriousMrEnter Mysterious Mr. Enter]] with better editing. Unlike most [[CausticCritic Caustic Critics]] however, he does almost all of his reviews in the form of lists. He's also pretty humble, admitting to being biased at times and making it clear in all of the intros to his videos that he's not a FanHater (As you can see in the flavor text). But the former didn't become more blatantly obvious than in his [[https://youtu.be/-0MxCQmlmmE Top 10 Worst Cartoon Remakes list]]. It was pretty good for the most part. There's just three things I didn't like and/or understand. 1) I'm confused as to how the [[spoiler:Powerpuff Girls]] reboot wasn't at #10 considering he was the least critical of it compared to the others on the list. 2) I didn't really understand the TakeThat against the trailer for the new Ghostbusters movie. I know that the all-female cast didn't get a very warm welcome, but if there's one thing I know, it's that [[NeverTrustATrailer trailers can't be trusted]]. You don't know if the movie gonna be good regardless of the cast or not. But the DMoS for me is his #1 pick: [[spoiler:every single Franchise/ScoobyDoo remake in existence]]! Look, I don't care if he doesn't like [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]]; that's his opinion. But his reason behind his #1 pick shows just how biased he can be. Strider's criticisms about [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] are legitimate, if debatable (he found the show formulaic, boring and "nothing special"), but his only criticism about all of the remakes that followed was basically "The original was never any good to begin with, so the franchise should have died years ago!" In his defense, if I remember correctly, I think he did mention at some point that he doesn't feel like any of the remakes added anything new or interesting to the series. But even if he did, it was completely overshadowed by his rant about how annoyed he is that the franchise is still going after 40 years despite the original's lack of appeal to him. I totally understand where he's coming from; I get pretty surprised myself when I find out something that came out when I was a kid is still going on to this day, especially if it's a show I don't like. But I wouldn't be so annoyed as to place the entire franchise at #1 on a Worst Remakes list and bash it simply because of it's lifespan and the quality of the original alone. Not to mention that he seems to think that [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] is, like the other remakes he mentions, exactly the same as the original. Oh, and Strider seemed to have [[TookALevelInJerkass taken a level in jerkass]] for this entry. Usually, he just expresses his distaste in a professional and witty manner like the classy DeadpanSnarker he is. Here it sounds more like he's trying to rally all of his viewers against the franchise, what with him having the gall to assume that nobody actively watches [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] anyway, asking "Has any kid ever sat down and said, 'Oh, look! [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] is on!'?", and claiming that kids only watch it when there's nothing better to watch. Excuse me Strider, but I watched both [[spoiler: What's New, Scooby-Doo?]] and [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] regularly when I was a kid and loved them. Again, this is coming from a guy who claims to be fine with people liking something he doesn't. This assumption is not only hypocritical and insulting, it makes no sense. If a series has been remade over 19 times, then it must have some sort of fanbase otherwise it wouldn't have been remade even once! Even worse? In his [[https://youtu.be/IlkvxV1laO8 Top 10 Best Disney Movies list]], he references the angry comments he got from this in a gag where he calmly says "[[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] kinda... sucks?" before being pelted by tomatoes. As if he was being totally reasonable with his decision and the viewers were the ones being ridiculous! Can someone please remind him that he specifically described his #2 pick, [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], as "the devil's anus of bad"? If he thinks [[spoiler:the entire Scooby-Doo franchise]] is even worse than [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], then "it kinda sucks" isn't even close to what he was saying. Not only that, but judging by Strider's comment about [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/N95f7baE0as?list=PLfji1gVKy4fYaePq-q1ox2S24X8VZbelZ Top 10 Worst Cartoon Live Action Remakes list]], he seems to think that the only people who are mad at him for this are the [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] fans. Implying that he genuinely believes that all of those angry comments were from the FanDumb as opposed to some belonging to those who saw just how biased he was being. I was so disappointed with him, I couldn't bring myself to listen to him re-explain why he hates [[spoiler:Scooby Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/P9NLefklYK8 Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes list]] and skipped over it. (But judging by his added comment of "Forever" in the entry title, he was trying to justify cramming the entire franchise on the top spot of his Worst Remakes list). I don't believe in Unsubscribing, so I'll continue to watch his videos. But you'd think somebody who claims to enjoy engaging in intelligent conversation would have a better reason for his #1 pick than "there's too many remakes".
25th Apr '17 4:33:57 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, Flippy in my opinion is nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all, and gives other bears (both fictional and real) a bad name. After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! And it was one of the first times I wanted to strangle a fictional character. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.

to:

** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), final nail on HTF's coffin for me), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, Flippy in my opinion is nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all, and gives other bears (both fictional and real) a bad name. After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! And it was one of the first times I wanted to strangle a fictional character. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.



* Tropers/TommyTiger: I've never watched these, but the "X tells Y (a villain) Something" videos are just awful, because of the disproportionate political rank in the videos. We've had such monstrosities as "[[Disney/TheAristocats Roquefort]] tells [[Disney/AliceInWonderland the Queen of Hearts]] to be quiet", "[[Disney/AGoofyMovie Max]] tells [[Disney/{{Pocahontas}} Governor Ratcliffe]] to get his own life" and [[WesternAnimation/TheFairlyOddParents Vicky]] telling [[Disney/RobinHood Prince John]] BED TWERP" (the last one's particularly dumb, as the one who addresses Prince John is as bad as him, if not worse). However, none of these were the motive for this entry. Nope, it was the video "Tommy and Tallulah (I don't know where are they from, but they are freaking ''kids'') tell Prince John to stop and tell him off". I fail to see any logic behind those characters giving the villains a TheReasonYouSuckSpeech. It's a failed attempt at making a MomentOfAwesome that beginned with someone making this kind of video and others hopping on the bandwagon.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: I've never watched these, but the "X tells Y (a villain) Something" videos are just awful, because of the disproportionate political rank in the videos. We've had such monstrosities as "[[Disney/TheAristocats Roquefort]] tells [[Disney/AliceInWonderland the Queen of Hearts]] to be quiet", "[[Disney/AGoofyMovie Max]] tells [[Disney/{{Pocahontas}} Governor Ratcliffe]] to get his own life" and [[WesternAnimation/TheFairlyOddParents Vicky]] telling [[Disney/RobinHood Prince John]] BED TWERP" TWERP (the last one's particularly dumb, as the one who addresses Prince John is as bad as him, if not worse). However, none of these were the motive for this entry. Nope, it was the video "Tommy and Tallulah (I don't know where are they from, but they are freaking ''kids'') tell Prince John to stop and tell him off". I fail to see any logic behind those characters giving the villains a TheReasonYouSuckSpeech. It's a failed attempt at making a MomentOfAwesome that beginned with someone making this kind of video and others hopping on the bandwagon.
24th Apr '17 7:52:29 AM FromtheWordsofBR
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I used to really enjoy ''Scientifically Accurate'', but I knew from the get-go that ''Scientifically Accurate [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic My Little Pony]]'' was going to be a huge mess. Shockingly enough, though, the brony-bashing is kept to a minimum of one mention of how [[spoiler:[[{{Squick}} Beijing serves horse privates as food]]]] (then again, I didn't mind the brony-bashing line in "Today Was a Good Day on the Internet" because everything else in that one was well-executed and [[EarWorm catchy]]). Unfortunately, the rest of the video is just dull. The accurate stuff isn't as hilariously sick and twisted as the other videos are, being just normal stuff real-life horses do. Sure, other videos do normal descriptions of animals, but it's nowhere near as soul-suckingly humorless as it is in this installment. It's not bad enough to make me quit watching their videos, as ''Animation Domination High-Def'' is responsible for a lot of decent parodies, but it's just a gigantic misstep, and it's pretty much ruined the other ''[=SA=]'' videos for me.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I used to really enjoy ''Scientifically Accurate'', but I knew from the get-go that ''Scientifically Accurate [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic My Little Pony]]'' was going to be a huge mess. Shockingly enough, though, the only brony-bashing there is kept to is a minimum of one mention of how [[spoiler:[[{{Squick}} Beijing serves considers horse privates as food]]]] a delicacy]]]] (then again, I didn't mind the brony-bashing line in "Today Was a Good Day on the Internet" because everything else in that one was well-executed and [[EarWorm catchy]]). Unfortunately, the rest of the video is just dull. The accurate stuff isn't as hilariously sick and twisted as the other videos are, being just normal stuff real-life horses do. Sure, other videos do normal descriptions that sort of animals, thing, but it's nowhere near as soul-suckingly humorless as it is in this installment. It's not bad enough to make me quit watching their videos, as ''Animation Domination High-Def'' is responsible for a lot of decent parodies, but it's just a gigantic misstep, and it's pretty much ruined the other ''[=SA=]'' videos for me.installment.



* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: The [[BileFascination only reason]] why I read the ''Watchdog'' blog from the [[MoralGuardians Parents Television Council]] is [[SoBadItsGood to see what hilarious overreaction of the day they have]]. I hate them, but they've never particularly ticked me off...until now. My breaking point was their "[[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2015/05/06/worst-tv-show-of-the-week-izombie-on-the-cw/ review]]" of ''Series/IZombie''. I could already point out several things wrong with this review (such as them calling Liv eating ramen with sprinkled brains "sickening" when the show does a good job at making it not as [[NauseaFuel nausea-inducing]] as it should be, and claiming that it tries to "lure in" audiences with "faux-''Series/VeronicaMars''[=/=]''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''-style dialogue". Gee, maybe it's because the people behind ''[=iZombie=]'' are the same ones behind ''Veronica Mars''?!?!), but the thing that ticked me off the most was a passage that says "Genre fans claim to watch programs like ''Series/TheWalkingDead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' for the dramatic plots, the quality of the characterization and dialogue, even the humor. Assuming they’re telling the truth and aren’t just turned on by gore..." That's right, they're essentially [[FanHater calling anybody who dare enjoys]] ''The Walking Dead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' people with fetishes for gore. That is far more sickening than Liv eating ramen-brains will ever be. Saying things like that only makes you look far more immature than the shows you protest. Also, I know that they've "counteracted" this "claim" several times before, but this demonstrates that they don't know how to use a remote control--just turn the show off if you don't like it, instead of trying to shut it down for people who actually enjoy it for legitimate reasons. And if you don't want to "be forced to pay" for shows you don't like, then you should probably just cut the cord and watch what you want to watch online instead of [[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2014/11/13/worst-cable-tv-show-of-the-week-american-horror-story-freak-show-on-fx/#comments whining about it]].

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: The [[BileFascination only reason]] why I I've read the ''Watchdog'' blog from the [[MoralGuardians Parents Television Council]] is [[SoBadItsGood to see what hilarious overreaction of the day they have]]. I hate them, but they've never particularly ticked me off...until now. My breaking point was their they "[[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2015/05/06/worst-tv-show-of-the-week-izombie-on-the-cw/ review]]" of reviewed]]" ''Series/IZombie''. I could already point out several things wrong with this review (such as them calling Liv eating ramen with sprinkled brains "sickening" when the show does a good job at making it not as [[NauseaFuel nausea-inducing]] as it should be, and claiming that it tries to "lure in" audiences with "faux-''Series/VeronicaMars''[=/=]''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''-style dialogue". Gee, maybe it's because dialogue"...when the people behind ''[=iZombie=]'' are the same ones behind ''Veronica Mars''?!?!), Mars''), but the thing that really ticked me off the most was a passage that says "Genre fans claim to watch programs like ''Series/TheWalkingDead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' for the dramatic plots, the quality of the characterization and dialogue, even the humor. Assuming they’re telling the truth and aren’t just turned on by gore..." That's right, they're essentially [[FanHater calling anybody who dare enjoys]] ''The Walking Dead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' people with fetishes for gore. That And yet, generalizing people who like those shows is far more less sickening than Liv eating ramen-brains will ever be. ramen-brains? Saying things like that only makes you look far more immature than the shows you protest. Also, I know that they've "counteracted" this "claim" several times before, but this demonstrates that they don't know how to use a remote control--just turn the show off if you don't like it, instead of trying to shut it down for people who actually enjoy it for legitimate reasons. And if If you don't want your kid to "be forced to pay" for shows you watch it, don't like, then you should probably just cut the cord and let them watch it--it's the parent's job and responsibility to monitor what you want their kids watch. If their kids are watching something that is "harmful", then don't try to get it shut down for everyone else--just don't let your kids watch online instead of [[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2014/11/13/worst-cable-tv-show-of-the-week-american-horror-story-freak-show-on-fx/#comments whining about it]].it!



** [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: Definitely gonna have to agree. While the actual video in question was actually pretty good (with many good points), this response was just...bleh, especially since both Rion and B.O.P. have done much better videos. It starts out fine, but it would've felt better if it were just a Quickie on Rion's normal channel. And then the last 3 minutes come in. That Last DJ attitude just rubs me the wrong way because he and the others in B.O.P. criticize Johnny for being hypocritical when Rion just did the same thing here (acting egotistical in his hate for Mr. Enter and rallying up all his fans to unsubscribe because of a video he didn't like and [somewhat] attack users who dislike the video, while criticizing Mr. Enter for being egotistical with his hate for trolls). Which is [[OOCIsSeriousBusiness beyond]] [[{{Irony}} mind-numbing]] because he's normally excellent at avoiding {{hypocrisy}}. All in all, it's a rare misstep for a normally flawless commentator, perhaps one of his only ones so far.
23rd Apr '17 4:50:41 PM BlackBaroness
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** [=BlackBaroness=]: Post-reboot, the 4/22/2017 Troll Show was among his lousiest broadcasts: [[ViewersAreGoldfish retreading of past topics]], [[MotorMouth rambling]], letting the [[CreatorsPet Inner Circle]] work out their own drama on the air, having a grouchy (but not [[HairTriggerTemper volatile]]) attitude that wasn't entertaining to listen to, and [[{{Padding}} holding off Radio Graffiti]] [[LyingCreator despite having promised an extra hour of it]]. Even the trolls weren't that funny in their own right, nor were they able to rouse Ghost out of his grouchiness until the end. There were some cans.wav, but with the dour mood of the rest of the episode, it felt more like [[{{Kayfabe}} he was doing it out of obligation rather than sincerity]]. It was bad enough for me to question whether the Troll Show is even worth listening to anymore, especially if Ghost is even less likely to react to trolls than on TCR.
22nd Apr '17 3:37:00 PM Asue
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/{{Phobosong}}: Voice of Reason's "Balanced Perspective" of the first Equestria Girls with ToonkriticY2k and Past Analysis is a mess, and shows every overused and flimsy argument against the movie, and quite frankly, the problems that plague the MLP analysis community (mind you, this is coming from someone who wasn't even ''that'' big of a fan of the first one, and knew it had plenty of flaws). Even if you don't like EqG, it's clear he has a massive BiasStreamroller against it, especially when he mentions how high the movie would be on his "Top Ten Worst MLP Episodes" if it were an episode. One particularly bad part is when, upon hearing that the movie didn't have ''that'' much fanservice, throws in a bunch of references to the show such as Pinkie's party cannon line and a powered up Rainbow taking Scootaloo for a ride in the party as a sort of "take that". While one could argue that there was some fanservice (the Derpy in the credits is a good example), it's really presumptuous to assume that every single one of those references is just "pandering". Believe it or not, VoR, sometimes writers just want to make little references to past things done by themselves or by other writers on this show they've been working on. But no, just assume that that party cannon line was made just to appease bronies, and not a fun, ironic joke McCarthy was making that referenced an older episode of hers. Just assume that scene of Rainbow flying with Scootaloo is fanservice, and not just a little nod to how Rainbow and Scootaloo had just gotten a nice friendship in the show. Just assume everything's about you and other bronies. There's other flaws, like scoffing at the idea that Sunset's defeat was a nice tribute to Nightmare Moon's defeat, saying it was just a rehash. This completely ignores the thematic reasons for this similarity: both Sunset and NM had feelings of anger and resentment, turned to magic, and were suddenly taken over by something powerful and evil, only to be freed from their monstrous torment by the Elements of Harmony. ''Of course'' they'd be similar. But, like many reviewers, he seemed to completely miss that Sunset was shocked by her transformation, or rather, he couldn't be bothered to notice that, and what that said about her character. For something called a "Balanced Perspective", VoR's biased, obnoxious review takes up the spotlight, he has absolutely no intention on being balanced or fair himself, and it ''really'' hurts the review to an infuriating degree.

to:

* Tropers/{{Phobosong}}: Voice of Reason's "Balanced Perspective" of the first Equestria Girls with ToonkriticY2k and Past Analysis is a mess, and shows every overused and flimsy argument against the movie, and quite frankly, the problems that plague the MLP analysis community (mind you, this is coming from someone who wasn't even ''that'' big of a fan of the first one, and knew it had plenty of flaws). Even if you don't like EqG, EquestriaGirls, it's clear he has a massive BiasStreamroller against it, especially when he mentions how high the movie would be on his "Top Ten Worst MLP Episodes" if it were an episode. One particularly bad part is when, upon hearing that the movie didn't have ''that'' much fanservice, throws in a bunch of references to the show such as Pinkie's party cannon line and a powered up Rainbow taking Scootaloo for a ride in the party as a sort of "take that". While one could argue that there was some fanservice (the Derpy in the credits is a good example), it's really presumptuous to assume that every single one of those references is just "pandering". Believe it or not, VoR, sometimes sometimes, writers just want to make little references to past things done by themselves or by other writers on this show they've been working on. But no, just assume that that party cannon line was made just to appease bronies, and not a fun, ironic joke McCarthy was making that referenced an older episode of hers. Just assume that scene of Rainbow flying with Scootaloo is fanservice, and not just a little nod to how Rainbow and Scootaloo had just gotten a nice friendship in the show. Just assume everything's about you and other bronies. There's other flaws, like scoffing at the idea that Sunset's defeat was a nice tribute to Nightmare Moon's defeat, saying it was just a rehash. This completely ignores the thematic reasons for this similarity: both Sunset and NM had feelings of anger and resentment, turned to magic, and were suddenly taken over by something powerful and evil, only to be freed from their monstrous torment by the Elements of Harmony. ''Of course'' they'd be similar. But, like many reviewers, he seemed to completely miss that Sunset was shocked by her transformation, or rather, he couldn't be bothered to notice that, and what that said about her character. For something called a "Balanced Perspective", VoR's biased, obnoxious review takes up the spotlight, he has absolutely no intention on being balanced or fair himself, and it ''really'' hurts the review to an infuriating degree.
22nd Apr '17 1:29:09 PM Phobosong
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/{{Phobosong}}: Voice of Reason's "Balanced Perspective" of the first Equestria Girls with ToonkriticY2k and Past Analysis is a mess, and shows every overused and flimsy argument against the movie, and quite frankly, the problems that plague the MLP analysis community (mind you, this is coming from someone who wasn't even ''that'' big of a fan of the first one, and knew it had plenty of flaws). Even if you don't like EqG, it's clear he has a massive BiasStreamroller against it, especially when he mentions how high the movie would be on his "Top Ten Worst MLP Episodes" if it were an episode. One particularly bad part is when, upon hearing that the movie didn't have ''that'' much fanservice, throws in a bunch of references to the show such as Pinkie's party cannon line and a powered up Rainbow taking Scootaloo for a ride in the party as a sort of "take that". While one could argue that there was some fanservice (the Derpy in the credits is a good example), it's really presumptuous to assume that every single one of those references is just "pandering". Believe it or not, VoR, sometimes writers just want to make little references to past things done by themselves or by other writers on this show they've been working on. But no, just assume that that party cannon line was made just to appease bronies, and not a fun, ironic joke McCarthy was making that referenced an older episode of hers. Just assume that scene of Rainbow flying with Scootaloo is fanservice, and not just a little nod to how Rainbow and Scootaloo had just gotten a nice friendship in the show. Just assume everything's about you and other bronies. There's other flaws, like scoffing at the idea that Sunset's defeat was a nice tribute to Nightmare Moon's defeat, saying it was just a rehash. This completely ignores the thematic reasons for this similarity: both Sunset and NM had feelings of anger and resentment, turned to magic, and were suddenly taken over by something powerful and evil, only to be freed from their monstrous torment by the Elements of Harmony. ''Of course'' they'd be similar. But, like many reviewers, he seemed to completely miss that Sunset was shocked by her transformation, or rather, he couldn't be bothered to notice that, and what that said about her character. For something called a "Balanced Perspective", VoR's biased, obnoxious review takes up the spotlight, he has absolutely no intention on being balanced or fair himself, and it ''really'' hurts the review to an infuriating degree.
20th Apr '17 2:07:14 PM Asue
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/{{Asue}}: I seriously love [[FrVideoWeb/JoueurDuGrenier Le Joueur du Grenier]] (The Attic Gamer), a French web show that is like if you mixed [[WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd AVGN]] with [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic The Nostalgia Critic]] (he reviews both video games and TV shows/movies) while downplaying the ToiletHumor and shouting, respectively, of both shows. Sadly, however, when it comes to review anything [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic]]-related in both his "2D to 3D" and second video game-related adaptations episodes, he's pretty bad. Now, it's not a case of HePannedItNowHeSucks, as I'm fully aware of the franchise's faults (like the corny voice acting and, well, Sonic '06. 'Nuff said.) and am okay with people not liking it... As long as their criticisms of it are anything credible and fair. In both episodes, when it comes to talk about the series, he shows an awfully obvious and painful BiasSteamroller (as well as a AuthorFilibuster in the latter-mentionned episode) towards it and pan all the games who are not ''Sonic The Hedgehog 1'', mainly because of Sonic's "shitty friends" (1. He's also including Tails and Knuckles, meaning that he only likes Sonic and Dr. Egg- Robotnik, and 2. [[DiscreditedMeme No one uses that expression anymore]], or at least, in a serious manner), the fact that Sonic talks [[NostalgiaFilter and the fact that the series' main gameplay has changed since 1991]]. And, yeah, that's it. That's his reasoning of why he doesn't like the series anymore (and before someone says to me that [[JustJokingJustification only his JDG persona thinks like this]], he went on in another video to say much of the same things as himself). Sorry, but you have to be kidding me if those petty grips are credible reasons to dislike an entire franchise. ([[OlderThanTheyThink Also, Akira Toriyama didn't invent the concept of a rival who's also an Anti-Hero with Vegeta, JDG.]] Calling Shadow a Vegeta rip-off was really low.)

to:

* Tropers/{{Asue}}: I seriously love [[FrVideoWeb/JoueurDuGrenier [[WebVideo/JoueurDuGrenier Le Joueur du Grenier]] (The Attic Gamer), a French web show that is like if you mixed [[WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd AVGN]] with [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic The Nostalgia Critic]] (he reviews both video games and TV shows/movies) while downplaying the ToiletHumor and shouting, respectively, of both shows. Sadly, however, when it comes to review anything [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic]]-related in both his "2D to 3D" and second video game-related adaptations episodes, he's pretty bad. Now, it's not a case of HePannedItNowHeSucks, as I'm fully aware of the franchise's faults (like the corny voice acting and, well, Sonic '06. 'Nuff said.) and am okay with people not liking it... As long as their criticisms of it are anything credible and fair. In both episodes, when it comes to talk about the series, he shows an awfully obvious and painful BiasSteamroller (as well as a AuthorFilibuster in the latter-mentionned episode) towards it and pan all the games who are not ''Sonic The Hedgehog 1'', mainly because of Sonic's "shitty friends" (1. He's also including Tails and Knuckles, meaning that he only likes Sonic and Dr. Egg- Robotnik, and 2. [[DiscreditedMeme No one uses that expression anymore]], or at least, in a serious manner), the fact that Sonic talks [[NostalgiaFilter and the fact that the series' main gameplay has changed since 1991]]. And, yeah, that's it. That's his reasoning of why he doesn't like the series anymore (and before someone says to me that [[JustJokingJustification only his JDG persona thinks like this]], he went on in another video to say much of the same things as himself). Sorry, but you have to be kidding me if those petty grips are credible reasons to dislike an entire franchise. ([[OlderThanTheyThink Also, Akira Toriyama didn't invent the concept of a rival who's also an Anti-Hero with Vegeta, JDG.]] Calling Shadow a Vegeta rip-off was really low.)
18th Apr '17 7:47:21 PM FromtheWordsofBR
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I used to really enjoy ''Scientifically Accurate'', but I knew from the get-go that ''Scientifically Accurate [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic My Little Pony]]'' was going to be a huge mess. Shockingly enough, though, the brony-bashing is kept to a minimum of one mention of how [[spoiler:[[{{Squick}} Beijing serves horse privates as food]]]] (then again, I didn't mind the brony-bashing line in "Today Was a Good Day on the Internet" because everything else in that one was well-executed and [[EarWorm catchy]]). Unfortunately, the rest of the video is just dull. The accurate stuff isn't as hilariously sick and twisted as the other videos are, being just normal stuff real-life horses do. Sure, other videos do normal descriptions of animals, but it's nowhere near as soul-suckingly humorless as it is in this installment. It's not bad enough to make me quit watching their videos, as ''Animation Domination High-Def'' is responsible for a lot of decent parodies, but it's just a gigantic misstep, and it's kind of ruined the other ''[=SA=]'' videos for me.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I used to really enjoy ''Scientifically Accurate'', but I knew from the get-go that ''Scientifically Accurate [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic My Little Pony]]'' was going to be a huge mess. Shockingly enough, though, the brony-bashing is kept to a minimum of one mention of how [[spoiler:[[{{Squick}} Beijing serves horse privates as food]]]] (then again, I didn't mind the brony-bashing line in "Today Was a Good Day on the Internet" because everything else in that one was well-executed and [[EarWorm catchy]]). Unfortunately, the rest of the video is just dull. The accurate stuff isn't as hilariously sick and twisted as the other videos are, being just normal stuff real-life horses do. Sure, other videos do normal descriptions of animals, but it's nowhere near as soul-suckingly humorless as it is in this installment. It's not bad enough to make me quit watching their videos, as ''Animation Domination High-Def'' is responsible for a lot of decent parodies, but it's just a gigantic misstep, and it's kind of pretty much ruined the other ''[=SA=]'' videos for me.



* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even though the bit with his friend Ralphthemoviemaker was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny....this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), and worst of all, [[DudeNotFunny it's not funny, not even in the black sort of sense]]. I know Ralph's bit was produced by himself but there was no need for that joke and it soured the video a bit for me (still a damn good video either way, but good lord) due to how unnecessary and hypocritical it was. Also, Ralph avoids using {{Overly Long Gag}}s in his videos for the most part.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even though thought the bit with his friend Ralphthemoviemaker Ralph Sepe was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!!), minute!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny....this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), and worst of all, [[DudeNotFunny it's not funny, not even in the black sort of sense]]. I know It's especially jarring given that Ralph's bit was produced by himself but there was no need for own videos generally avoid using drawn-out gags like that joke and it soured most of the video a bit for me (still time. Still a damn good video either way, but good lord) due to how unnecessary and hypocritical it was. Also, Ralph avoids using {{Overly Long Gag}}s in his videos for the most part.lord.



* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: For me, it's when Proto told commentator Kayden Marx, who is in a financial rut and has started a [=GoFundMe=] to have fans donate money for his insurance, that [[DudeNotFunny he deserved to be in said rut]]. And then he had his fans raid [=youngbloodfantasy91=]'s commentary on him and bring the video to an insane and undeserved amount of dislikes. All because Kayden made a commentary on him that actually makes decent points. [[FlatWhat What.]] Given that I'm barely familiar with Proto's work, [[SarcasmMode talk about a good first impression.]]

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: For me, it's when Proto told commentator Kayden Marx, who is was stuck in a financial rut and has started a [=GoFundMe=] to have fans donate money for his insurance, that [[DudeNotFunny he deserved to be in said rut]]. And then he had his fans raid [=youngbloodfantasy91=]'s commentary on him and bring the video to an insane and undeserved amount of dislikes. All because Kayden made a commentary on him that actually makes decent points. [[FlatWhat What.]] Given that I'm barely familiar with Proto's work, [[SarcasmMode talk about a good first impression.]]



* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: The [[BileFascination only reason]] why I read the ''Watchdog'' blog from the [[MoralGuardians Parents Television Council]] is [[SoBadItsGood to see what hilarious overreaction of the day they have]]. I hate them, but they've never particularly ticked me off...until now. My breaking point was their "[[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2015/05/06/worst-tv-show-of-the-week-izombie-on-the-cw/ review]]" of ''Series/IZombie''. I could already point out several things wrong with this review (such as them calling Liv eating ramen with sprinkled brains "sickening" when the show does a good job at making it not as [[NauseaFuel nausea-inducing]] as it should be, and claiming that it tries to "lure in" audiences with "faux-''Series/VeronicaMars''[=/=]''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''-style dialogue". Gee, maybe it's because the people behind ''[=iZombie=]'' are the same ones behind ''Veronica Mars''?!?!), but the thing that ticked me off the most was a passage that says "Genre fans claim to watch programs like ''Series/TheWalkingDead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' for the dramatic plots, the quality of the characterization and dialogue, even the humor. Assuming they’re telling the truth and aren’t just turned on by gore..." That's right, they're essentially [[FanHater calling anybody who dare enjoys]] ''The Walking Dead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' people with fetishes for gore. That is far more sickening than Liv eating ramen-brains will ever be. Saying things like that only makes you look far more immature than the shows you protest. Also, I know that they've "counteracted" this "claim" several times before, but this demonstrates that they don't know how to use a remote control--just turn the show off if you don't like it, instead of trying to shut it down for people who actually enjoy it for legitimate reasons. And if you don't want to "be forced to pay" for shows you don't like, then you should probably just cut the cord and watch what you want to watch online instead of [[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2014/11/13/worst-cable-tv-show-of-the-week-american-horror-story-freak-show-on-fx/#comments whining about it]]. And they wonder why the creator of ''Series/SonsOfAnarchy'' hates them so much.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: The [[BileFascination only reason]] why I read the ''Watchdog'' blog from the [[MoralGuardians Parents Television Council]] is [[SoBadItsGood to see what hilarious overreaction of the day they have]]. I hate them, but they've never particularly ticked me off...until now. My breaking point was their "[[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2015/05/06/worst-tv-show-of-the-week-izombie-on-the-cw/ review]]" of ''Series/IZombie''. I could already point out several things wrong with this review (such as them calling Liv eating ramen with sprinkled brains "sickening" when the show does a good job at making it not as [[NauseaFuel nausea-inducing]] as it should be, and claiming that it tries to "lure in" audiences with "faux-''Series/VeronicaMars''[=/=]''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''-style dialogue". Gee, maybe it's because the people behind ''[=iZombie=]'' are the same ones behind ''Veronica Mars''?!?!), but the thing that ticked me off the most was a passage that says "Genre fans claim to watch programs like ''Series/TheWalkingDead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' for the dramatic plots, the quality of the characterization and dialogue, even the humor. Assuming they’re telling the truth and aren’t just turned on by gore..." That's right, they're essentially [[FanHater calling anybody who dare enjoys]] ''The Walking Dead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' people with fetishes for gore. That is far more sickening than Liv eating ramen-brains will ever be. Saying things like that only makes you look far more immature than the shows you protest. Also, I know that they've "counteracted" this "claim" several times before, but this demonstrates that they don't know how to use a remote control--just turn the show off if you don't like it, instead of trying to shut it down for people who actually enjoy it for legitimate reasons. And if you don't want to "be forced to pay" for shows you don't like, then you should probably just cut the cord and watch what you want to watch online instead of [[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2014/11/13/worst-cable-tv-show-of-the-week-american-horror-story-freak-show-on-fx/#comments whining about it]]. And they wonder why the creator of ''Series/SonsOfAnarchy'' hates them so much.
18th Apr '17 12:05:20 PM Asue
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/{{Asue}}: I seriously love [[FrVideoWeb/JoueurDuGrenier Le Joueur du Grenier]] (The Attic Gamer), a French web show that is like if you mixed [[WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd AVGN]] with [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic The Nostalgia Critic]] (he reviews both video games and TV shows/movies) while downplaying the ToiletHumor and shouting, respectively, of both shows. Sadly, however, when it comes to review anything [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic]]-related in both his "2D to 3D" and second video game-related adaptations episodes, he's pretty bad. Now, it's not a case of HePannedItNowHeSucks, as I'm fully aware of the franchise's faults (like the corny voice acting and, well, Sonic '06. 'Nuff said.) and am okay with people not liking it... As long as their criticisms of it are anything credible and fair. In both episodes, when it comes to talk about the series, he shows an awfully obvious and painful BiasSteamroller (as well as a AuthorFilibuster in the latter-mentionned episode) towards it and pan all the games who are not ''Sonic The Hedgehog 1'', mainly because of Sonic's "shitty friends" (1. He's also including Tails and Knuckles, meaning that he only likes Sonic and Dr. Egg- Robotnik, and 2. [[DiscreditedMeme No one uses that expression anymore]], or at least, in a serious manner), the fact that Sonic talks [[NostalgiaFilter and the fact that the series' main gameplay has changed since 1991]]. And, yeah, that's it. That's his reasoning of why he doesn't like the series anymore (and before someone says to me that [[OnlyJokingJustification only his JDG persona thinks like this]], he went on in another video to say much of the same things as himself). Sorry, but you have to be kidding me if those petty grips are credible reasons to dislike an entire franchise. ([[OlderThanTheyThink Also, Akira Toriyama didn't invent the concept of a rival who's also an Anti-Hero with Vegeta, JDG.]] Calling Shadow a Vegeta rip-off was really low.)

to:

* Tropers/{{Asue}}: I seriously love [[FrVideoWeb/JoueurDuGrenier Le Joueur du Grenier]] (The Attic Gamer), a French web show that is like if you mixed [[WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd AVGN]] with [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic The Nostalgia Critic]] (he reviews both video games and TV shows/movies) while downplaying the ToiletHumor and shouting, respectively, of both shows. Sadly, however, when it comes to review anything [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic]]-related in both his "2D to 3D" and second video game-related adaptations episodes, he's pretty bad. Now, it's not a case of HePannedItNowHeSucks, as I'm fully aware of the franchise's faults (like the corny voice acting and, well, Sonic '06. 'Nuff said.) and am okay with people not liking it... As long as their criticisms of it are anything credible and fair. In both episodes, when it comes to talk about the series, he shows an awfully obvious and painful BiasSteamroller (as well as a AuthorFilibuster in the latter-mentionned episode) towards it and pan all the games who are not ''Sonic The Hedgehog 1'', mainly because of Sonic's "shitty friends" (1. He's also including Tails and Knuckles, meaning that he only likes Sonic and Dr. Egg- Robotnik, and 2. [[DiscreditedMeme No one uses that expression anymore]], or at least, in a serious manner), the fact that Sonic talks [[NostalgiaFilter and the fact that the series' main gameplay has changed since 1991]]. And, yeah, that's it. That's his reasoning of why he doesn't like the series anymore (and before someone says to me that [[OnlyJokingJustification [[JustJokingJustification only his JDG persona thinks like this]], he went on in another video to say much of the same things as himself). Sorry, but you have to be kidding me if those petty grips are credible reasons to dislike an entire franchise. ([[OlderThanTheyThink Also, Akira Toriyama didn't invent the concept of a rival who's also an Anti-Hero with Vegeta, JDG.]] Calling Shadow a Vegeta rip-off was really low.)
18th Apr '17 12:04:11 PM Asue
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/{{Asue}}: I seriously love [[FrVideoWeb/JoueurDuGrenier Le Joueur du Grenier]] (The Attic Gamer), a French web show that is like if you mixed [[WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd AVGN]] with [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic The Nostalgia Critic]] (he reviews both video games and TV shows/movies) while downplaying the ToiletHumor and shouting, respectively, of both shows. Sadly, however, when it comes to review anything [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic]]-related in both his "2D to 3D" and second video game-related adaptations episodes, he's pretty bad. Now, it's not a case of HePannedItNowHeSucks, as I'm fully aware of the franchise's faults (like the corny voice acting and, well, Sonic '06. 'Nuff said.) and am okay with people not liking it... As long as their criticisms of it are anything credible and fair. In both episodes, when it comes to talk about the series, he shows an awfully obvious and painful BiasSteamroller (as well as a AuthorFilibuster in the latter-mentionned episode) towards it and pan all the games who are not ''Sonic The Hedgehog 1'', mainly because of Sonic's "shitty friends" (1. He's also including Tails and Knuckles, meaning that he only likes Sonic and Dr. Egg- Robotnik, and 2. [[DiscreditedMeme No one uses that expression anymore]], or at least, in a serious manner), the fact that Sonic talks [[NostalgiaFilter and the fact that the series' main gameplay has changed since 1991]]. And, yeah, that's it. That's his reasoning of why he doesn't like the series anymore (and before someone says to me that [[OnlyJokingJustification only his JDG persona thinks like this]], he went on in another video to say much of the same things as himself). Sorry, but you have to be kidding me if those petty grips are credible reasons to dislike an entire franchise. ([[OlderThanTheyThink Also, {{Creator/AkiraToriyama}} didn't invent the concept of a rival who's also an Anti-Hero, JDG.]])

to:

* Tropers/{{Asue}}: I seriously love [[FrVideoWeb/JoueurDuGrenier Le Joueur du Grenier]] (The Attic Gamer), a French web show that is like if you mixed [[WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd AVGN]] with [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic The Nostalgia Critic]] (he reviews both video games and TV shows/movies) while downplaying the ToiletHumor and shouting, respectively, of both shows. Sadly, however, when it comes to review anything [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic]]-related in both his "2D to 3D" and second video game-related adaptations episodes, he's pretty bad. Now, it's not a case of HePannedItNowHeSucks, as I'm fully aware of the franchise's faults (like the corny voice acting and, well, Sonic '06. 'Nuff said.) and am okay with people not liking it... As long as their criticisms of it are anything credible and fair. In both episodes, when it comes to talk about the series, he shows an awfully obvious and painful BiasSteamroller (as well as a AuthorFilibuster in the latter-mentionned episode) towards it and pan all the games who are not ''Sonic The Hedgehog 1'', mainly because of Sonic's "shitty friends" (1. He's also including Tails and Knuckles, meaning that he only likes Sonic and Dr. Egg- Robotnik, and 2. [[DiscreditedMeme No one uses that expression anymore]], or at least, in a serious manner), the fact that Sonic talks [[NostalgiaFilter and the fact that the series' main gameplay has changed since 1991]]. And, yeah, that's it. That's his reasoning of why he doesn't like the series anymore (and before someone says to me that [[OnlyJokingJustification only his JDG persona thinks like this]], he went on in another video to say much of the same things as himself). Sorry, but you have to be kidding me if those petty grips are credible reasons to dislike an entire franchise. ([[OlderThanTheyThink Also, {{Creator/AkiraToriyama}} Akira Toriyama didn't invent the concept of a rival who's also an Anti-Hero, Anti-Hero with Vegeta, JDG.]])]] Calling Shadow a Vegeta rip-off was really low.)
18th Apr '17 12:02:31 PM Asue
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/Asue: I seriously love [[FrVideoWeb/JoueurDuGrenier Le Joueur du Grenier]] (The Attic Gamer), a French web show that is like if you mixed [[WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd AVGN]] with [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic The Nostalgia Critic]] (he reviews both video games and TV shows/movies) while downplaying the ToiletHumor and shouting, respectively, of both shows. Sadly, however, when it comes to review anything [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic]]-related in both his "2D to 3D" and second video game-related adaptations episodes, he's pretty bad. Now, it's not a case of HePannedItNowHeSucks, as I'm fully aware of the franchise's faults (like the corny voice acting and, well, Sonic '06. 'Nuff said.) and am okay with people not liking it... As long as their criticisms of it are anything credible and fair. In both episodes, when it comes to talk about the series, he shows an awfully obvious and painful BiasSteamroller (as well as a AuthorFilibuster in the latter-mentionned episode) towards it and pan all the games who are not ''Sonic The Hedgehog 1'', mainly because of Sonic's "shitty friends" (1. He's also including Tails and Knuckles, meaning that he only likes Sonic and Dr. Egg- Robotnik, and 2. [[DiscreditedMeme No one uses that expression anymore]], or at least, in a serious manner), the fact that Sonic talks [[NostalgiaFilter and the fact that the series' main gameplay has changed since 1991]]. And, yeah, that's it. That's his reasoning of why he doesn't like the series anymore (and before someone says to me that [[OnlyJokingJustification only his JDG persona thinks like this]], he went on in another video to say much of the same things as himself). Sorry, but you have to be kidding me if those petty grips are credible reasons to dislike an entire franchise. ([[OlderThanTheyThink Also, Creator/AkiraToriyama didn't invent the concept of a rival who's also an Anti-Hero, JDG.]])

to:

* Tropers/Asue: Tropers/{{Asue}}: I seriously love [[FrVideoWeb/JoueurDuGrenier Le Joueur du Grenier]] (The Attic Gamer), a French web show that is like if you mixed [[WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd AVGN]] with [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic The Nostalgia Critic]] (he reviews both video games and TV shows/movies) while downplaying the ToiletHumor and shouting, respectively, of both shows. Sadly, however, when it comes to review anything [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic]]-related in both his "2D to 3D" and second video game-related adaptations episodes, he's pretty bad. Now, it's not a case of HePannedItNowHeSucks, as I'm fully aware of the franchise's faults (like the corny voice acting and, well, Sonic '06. 'Nuff said.) and am okay with people not liking it... As long as their criticisms of it are anything credible and fair. In both episodes, when it comes to talk about the series, he shows an awfully obvious and painful BiasSteamroller (as well as a AuthorFilibuster in the latter-mentionned episode) towards it and pan all the games who are not ''Sonic The Hedgehog 1'', mainly because of Sonic's "shitty friends" (1. He's also including Tails and Knuckles, meaning that he only likes Sonic and Dr. Egg- Robotnik, and 2. [[DiscreditedMeme No one uses that expression anymore]], or at least, in a serious manner), the fact that Sonic talks [[NostalgiaFilter and the fact that the series' main gameplay has changed since 1991]]. And, yeah, that's it. That's his reasoning of why he doesn't like the series anymore (and before someone says to me that [[OnlyJokingJustification only his JDG persona thinks like this]], he went on in another video to say much of the same things as himself). Sorry, but you have to be kidding me if those petty grips are credible reasons to dislike an entire franchise. ([[OlderThanTheyThink Also, Creator/AkiraToriyama {{Creator/AkiraToriyama}} didn't invent the concept of a rival who's also an Anti-Hero, JDG.]])
18th Apr '17 11:59:48 AM Asue
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/Asue: I seriously love [[FrVideoWeb/JoueurDuGrenier Le Joueur du Grenier]] (The Attic Gamer), a French web show that's like if you mixed [[WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd AVGN]] with [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic The Nostalgia Critic]] (he reviews both video games and TV shows/movies) while downplaying the ToiletHumor and shouting, respectively, of both shows. Sadly, however, when it comes to review anything [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic]]-related in both his "2D to 3D" and second video game-related adaptations episodes, he's pretty bad. Now, it's not a case of HePannedItNowHeSucks, as I'm fully aware of the franchise's faults and am okay with people not liking it... As long as their criticisms of it are anything credible and fair. In both episodes, when it comes to talk about the series, he shows an awfully obvious and painful BiasSteamroller (as well as a AuthorFilibuster in the latter-mentionned episode) towards it and pan all the games who are not ''Sonic The Hedgehog 1'', mainly because of Sonic's "shitty friends" (including Tails and Knuckles, meaning he only likes Sonic and Dr. Egg- Robotnik), the fact that Sonic talks [[NostalgiaFilter and the fact that the series' main gameplay has changed since 1991]]. And, yeah, that's it. That's his reasoning of why he doesn't like the series anymore. Sorry, but you have to be kidding me if those are credible reasons to dislike a franchise.

to:

* Tropers/Asue: I seriously love [[FrVideoWeb/JoueurDuGrenier Le Joueur du Grenier]] (The Attic Gamer), a French web show that's that is like if you mixed [[WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd AVGN]] with [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic The Nostalgia Critic]] (he reviews both video games and TV shows/movies) while downplaying the ToiletHumor and shouting, respectively, of both shows. Sadly, however, when it comes to review anything [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic]]-related in both his "2D to 3D" and second video game-related adaptations episodes, he's pretty bad. Now, it's not a case of HePannedItNowHeSucks, as I'm fully aware of the franchise's faults (like the corny voice acting and, well, Sonic '06. 'Nuff said.) and am okay with people not liking it... As long as their criticisms of it are anything credible and fair. In both episodes, when it comes to talk about the series, he shows an awfully obvious and painful BiasSteamroller (as well as a AuthorFilibuster in the latter-mentionned episode) towards it and pan all the games who are not ''Sonic The Hedgehog 1'', mainly because of Sonic's "shitty friends" (including (1. He's also including Tails and Knuckles, meaning that he only likes Sonic and Dr. Egg- Robotnik), Robotnik, and 2. [[DiscreditedMeme No one uses that expression anymore]], or at least, in a serious manner), the fact that Sonic talks [[NostalgiaFilter and the fact that the series' main gameplay has changed since 1991]]. And, yeah, that's it. That's his reasoning of why he doesn't like the series anymore. anymore (and before someone says to me that [[OnlyJokingJustification only his JDG persona thinks like this]], he went on in another video to say much of the same things as himself). Sorry, but you have to be kidding me if those petty grips are credible reasons to dislike an entire franchise. ([[OlderThanTheyThink Also, Creator/AkiraToriyama didn't invent the concept of a franchise.rival who's also an Anti-Hero, JDG.]])
18th Apr '17 10:02:50 AM Asue
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/Asue: I seriously love [[FrVideoWeb/JoueurDuGrenier Le Joueur du Grenier]] (The Attic Gamer), a French web show that's like if you mixed [[WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd AVGN]] with [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic The Nostalgia Critic]] (he reviews both video games and TV shows/movies) while downplaying the ToiletHumor and shouting, respectively, of both shows. Sadly, however, when it comes to review anything [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic]]-related in both his "2D to 3D" and second video game-related adaptations episodes, he's pretty bad. Now, it's not a case of HePannedItNowHeSucks, as I'm fully aware of the franchise's faults and am okay with people not liking it... As long as their criticisms of it are anything credible and fair. In both episodes, when it comes to talk about the series, he shows an awfully obvious and painful BiasSteamroller (as well as a AuthorFilibuster in the latter-mentionned episode) towards it and pan all the games who are not ''Sonic The Hedgehog 1'', mainly because of Sonic's "shitty friends" (including Tails and Knuckles, meaning he only likes Sonic and Dr. Egg- Robotnik), the fact that Sonic talks [[NostalgiaFilter and the fact that the series' main gameplay has changed since 1991]]. And, yeah, that's it. That's his reasoning of why he doesn't like the series anymore. Sorry, but you have to be kidding me if those are credible reasons to dislike a franchise.
18th Apr '17 5:25:18 AM DoctorSleep
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/DoctorSleep: [[https://youtu.be/r11EmY6cKQE Ash vs Red Pokémon Battle]] by Gumbino. A concept that had plenty of potential to be both funny and faithful squandered in favour of making Ash look like the sorest loser on the planet. By far the lowest point had to be when Ash started stomping his feet and demanding that he be allowed to murder one of Red's Pokemon out of some inane sense of fairness.
17th Apr '17 10:04:14 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: I'm surprised I didn't mention this, as it has infuriated me a lot: The ''My Talking Tom'' shorts as a whole can be compared to ''WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGo''[[note]]which I enjoy, unlike most people[[/note]] in terms of ComedicSociopathy, but one video managed to [[DudeNotFunny cross the line]] even for the series: Episode 12, where it starts fine with Angela visiting Tom. But it all goes down when Angela starts changing Tom's house to fit ''[[ItsAllAboutMe her]]'' preference. Tom gets fed up and goes to find her. Then he chews her out for doing that, and it's easy to see why [[note]]Angela (read: a {{Jerkass}}+AlphaBitch combination) was vandalizing his ''own house''[[/note]], so what does she do: Apologize to him or turn the house back to normal? ''None'': she just turns Tom's console into a bouquet of flowers. Tom is rightfully ''pissed'' at this point, and starts throwing a tantrum, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him. Unfortunately, this insane fit is actually supposed to [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic make Angela look like the one who was wronged]], so she makes Tom wear a dress. The episode closes with [[UnintentionallySympathetic Tom]] [[BreakTheCutie ready to cry]], while Angela [[KarmaHoudini gets off scot-free]], with a shot of her turning the "My Taking Tom" logo into the "My Talking Angela" logo to drive the point home. You know that saying that WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter used to refer to: "What I'm doing is wrong, I know it's wrong, but I'm gonna do it anyway"? Well, that applies here: Angela is [[KickTheDog driving Tom crazy on purpose]], and she's actually ''happy'' to see him suffer. The abuse [[ButtMonkey Tom]] underwent is worse than what [[WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry Tom]] has gone through. And the CharacterDerailment Angela underwent also happened in the other "My Talking Tom" episode, and even other games like ''Talking Tom Jetski'' (Angela pushes Tom to get on the jetski if you select her). So, what is Outfit7 trying to teach us? [[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop It's OK to bully others]]? Ever since then, I couldn't stand [[TheScrappy Angela]] anymore. [[RescuedFromTheScrappyHeap Thank goodness]] the game "''Talking Tom Gold Run''", where she was easier to stomach, was published or she would NeverLiveItDown again. [[WithFriendsLikeThese With a Girlfriend Like Angela]], how is he still in love with her?

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: I'm surprised I didn't mention this, as it has infuriated me a lot: The ''My Talking Tom'' shorts as a whole can be compared to ''WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGo''[[note]]which I enjoy, unlike most people[[/note]] in terms of ComedicSociopathy, but one video managed to [[DudeNotFunny cross the line]] even for the series: Episode 12, where it starts fine with Angela visiting Tom. But it all goes down when Angela starts changing Tom's house to fit ''[[ItsAllAboutMe her]]'' preference. Tom gets fed up and goes to find her. Then he chews her out for doing that, and it's easy to see why [[note]]Angela (read: a {{Jerkass}}+AlphaBitch combination) was vandalizing his ''own house''[[/note]], so what does she do: Apologize to him or turn the house back to normal? ''None'': she just turns Tom's console into a bouquet of flowers. Tom is rightfully ''pissed'' at this point, and starts throwing a tantrum, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's Angela's done to him, it's hard to blame him. Unfortunately, this insane fit is actually supposed to [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic make Angela look like the one who was wronged]], so she makes Tom wear a dress. The episode closes with [[UnintentionallySympathetic Tom]] [[BreakTheCutie ready to cry]], while Angela [[KarmaHoudini gets off scot-free]], with a shot of her turning the "My Taking Talking Tom" logo into the "My Talking Angela" logo to drive the point home. You know that saying that WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter used to refer to: "What I'm doing is wrong, I know it's wrong, but I'm gonna do it anyway"? Well, that applies here: Angela is [[KickTheDog driving Tom crazy on purpose]], and she's actually ''happy'' to see him suffer. The abuse [[ButtMonkey Tom]] underwent is worse than what [[WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry Tom]] has gone through. And the CharacterDerailment Angela underwent also happened in the other "My Talking Tom" episode, and even other games like ''Talking Tom Jetski'' (Angela pushes Tom to get on the jetski if you select her). So, what is Outfit7 trying to teach us? [[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop It's OK to bully others]]? Ever since then, I couldn't stand [[TheScrappy Angela]] anymore. [[RescuedFromTheScrappyHeap Thank goodness]] the game "''Talking Tom Gold Run''", where she was easier to stomach, was published or she would NeverLiveItDown again. [[WithFriendsLikeThese With a Girlfriend Like Angela]], how is he still in love with her?
16th Apr '17 11:46:53 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: I'm surprised I didn't mention this, as it has infuriated me a lot: The ''My Talking Tom'' shorts as a whole can be compared to ''WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGo''[[note]]which I enjoy, unlike most people[[/note]] in terms of ComedicSociopathy, but one video managed to [[DudeNotFunny cross the line]] even for the series: Episode 12, where it starts fine with Angela visiting Tom. But it all goes down when Angela starts changing Tom's house to fit ''[[ItsAllAboutMe her]]'' preference. Tom gets fed up and goes to find her. Then he chews her out for doing that, and it's easy to see why [[note]]Angela (read: a {{Jerkass}}+AlphaBitch combination) was vandalizing his ''own house''[[/note]], so what does she do: Apologize to him or turn the house back to normal? ''None'': she just turns Tom's console into a bouquet of flowers. Tom is rightfully ''pissed'' at this point, and starts throwing a tantrum, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him. Unfortunately, this insane fit is actually supposed to [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic make Angela look like the one who was wronged]], so she makes Tom wear a dress. The episode closes with [[UnintentionallySympathetic Tom]] [[BreakTheCutie ready to cry]], while Angela [[KarmaHoudini gets off scot-free]], with a shot of her turning the "My Taking Tom" logo into the "My Talking Angela" logo to drive the point home. You know that saying that WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter used to refer to: "What I'm doing is wrong, I know it's wrong, but I'm gonna do it anyway"? Well, that applies here: Angela is [[KickTheDog driving Tom crazy on purpose]], and she's actually ''happy'' to see him suffer. The abuse [[ButtMonkey Tom]] underwent is worse than what [[WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry Tom]] has gone through. [[WithFriendsLikeThese With a Girlfriend Like Angela]], how is he still in love with her?

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: I'm surprised I didn't mention this, as it has infuriated me a lot: The ''My Talking Tom'' shorts as a whole can be compared to ''WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGo''[[note]]which I enjoy, unlike most people[[/note]] in terms of ComedicSociopathy, but one video managed to [[DudeNotFunny cross the line]] even for the series: Episode 12, where it starts fine with Angela visiting Tom. But it all goes down when Angela starts changing Tom's house to fit ''[[ItsAllAboutMe her]]'' preference. Tom gets fed up and goes to find her. Then he chews her out for doing that, and it's easy to see why [[note]]Angela (read: a {{Jerkass}}+AlphaBitch combination) was vandalizing his ''own house''[[/note]], so what does she do: Apologize to him or turn the house back to normal? ''None'': she just turns Tom's console into a bouquet of flowers. Tom is rightfully ''pissed'' at this point, and starts throwing a tantrum, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him. Unfortunately, this insane fit is actually supposed to [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic make Angela look like the one who was wronged]], so she makes Tom wear a dress. The episode closes with [[UnintentionallySympathetic Tom]] [[BreakTheCutie ready to cry]], while Angela [[KarmaHoudini gets off scot-free]], with a shot of her turning the "My Taking Tom" logo into the "My Talking Angela" logo to drive the point home. You know that saying that WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter used to refer to: "What I'm doing is wrong, I know it's wrong, but I'm gonna do it anyway"? Well, that applies here: Angela is [[KickTheDog driving Tom crazy on purpose]], and she's actually ''happy'' to see him suffer. The abuse [[ButtMonkey Tom]] underwent is worse than what [[WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry Tom]] has gone through. And the CharacterDerailment Angela underwent also happened in the other "My Talking Tom" episode, and even other games like ''Talking Tom Jetski'' (Angela pushes Tom to get on the jetski if you select her). So, what is Outfit7 trying to teach us? [[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop It's OK to bully others]]? Ever since then, I couldn't stand [[TheScrappy Angela]] anymore. [[RescuedFromTheScrappyHeap Thank goodness]] the game "''Talking Tom Gold Run''", where she was easier to stomach, was published or she would NeverLiveItDown again. [[WithFriendsLikeThese With a Girlfriend Like Angela]], how is he still in love with her?
16th Apr '17 11:42:10 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/MathsAngelicVersion: You might know that I don't think too highly of ''Disney/{{Tangled}}'', so it might not surprise you that I'm not thrilled about [[http://whatculture.com/ What Culture]]'s article "[[http://whatculture.com/film/10-reasons-frozen-definitely-disneys-best-animated-movie-decade.php/ 10 Reasons Frozen Is Definitely NOT Disney’s Best Animated Movie This Decade]]", which should've had the more honest title "10 Reasons I Think ''Tangled'' Kicks ''Disney/{{Frozen}}''[='=]s Ass".\\

to:

* Tropers/MathsAngelicVersion: You might know that I don't think too highly of ''Disney/{{Tangled}}'', so it might not surprise you that I'm not thrilled about [[http://whatculture.com/ What Culture]]'s article "[[http://whatculture.com/film/10-reasons-frozen-definitely-disneys-best-animated-movie-decade.php/ 10 Reasons Frozen Is Definitely NOT Disney’s Disney’s Best Animated Movie This Decade]]", which should've had the more honest title "10 Reasons I Think ''Tangled'' Kicks ''Disney/{{Frozen}}''[='=]s Ass".\\


Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: I'm surprised I didn't mention this, as it has infuriated me a lot: The ''My Talking Tom'' shorts as a whole can be compared to ''WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGo''[[note]]which I enjoy, unlike most people[[/note]] in terms of ComedicSociopathy, but one video managed to [[DudeNotFunny cross the line]] even for the series: Episode 12, where it starts fine with Angela visiting Tom. But it all goes down when Angela starts changing Tom's house to fit ''[[ItsAllAboutMe her]]'' preference. Tom gets fed up and goes to find her. Then he chews her out for doing that, and it's easy to see why [[note]]Angela (read: a {{Jerkass}}+AlphaBitch combination) was vandalizing his ''own house''[[/note]], so what does she do: Apologize to him or turn the house back to normal? ''None'': she just turns Tom's console into a bouquet of flowers. Tom is rightfully ''pissed'' at this point, and starts throwing a tantrum, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him. Unfortunately, this insane fit is actually supposed to [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic make Angela look like the one who was wronged]], so she makes Tom wear a dress. The episode closes with [[UnintentionallySympathetic Tom]] [[BreakTheCutie ready to cry]], while Angela [[KarmaHoudini gets off scot-free]], with a shot of her turning the "My Taking Tom" logo into the "My Talking Angela" logo to drive the point home. You know that saying that WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter used to refer to: "What I'm doing is wrong, I know it's wrong, but I'm gonna do it anyway"? Well, that applies here: Angela is [[KickTheDog driving Tom crazy on purpose]], and she's actually ''happy'' to see him suffer. The abuse [[ButtMonkey Tom]] underwent is worse than what [[WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry Tom]] has gone through. [[WithFriendsLikeThese With a Girlfriend Like Angela]], how is he still in love with her?
16th Apr '17 10:29:56 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: While I wasn't angry by his apology over his entry for "The Boys of Bummer", the fact that he hasn't rewriten his review for it like he promised and the fact that he was only motivated by DMOS entries in here makes his apology insincere and half-hearted, and that irks me a little. It reminds me of the time WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter "apologised" for the Twitter incident with [[WesternAnimation/SpongebobSquarepants Casey Alexander]].
14th Apr '17 10:40:46 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! And it was one of the first times I wanted to strangle a fictional character. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.

to:

** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're Flippy in my opinion is nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! all, and gives other bears (both fictional and real) a bad name. After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! And it was one of the first times I wanted to strangle a fictional character. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.
14th Apr '17 8:04:23 PM Bismuth83
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/Bismuth83: [[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1wWQb7GYP6d_FdrNts-DpQ Charriii5's]] Everything Wrong With videos for various games, while not as good as those produced by Dartigan, are still enjoyable to me. However, his response to the line "She's a woman, she doesn't know up from down" in his Sly 3: Honor Among Thieves video, was DEFINITELY a DMOS for me. Really? "Oh shit, incoming feminazis, abort video"? Not only are you kinda-sorta aligning yourself with Gamergate, a highly divisive movement, right there, you can't even bring yourself to say "That's SEXIST?!" WHAT?! Even more galling, as he has no problem with calling something racist!
13th Apr '17 2:24:02 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Murvine_Taylor: For me, my dethroning moment of GoAnimate would have to be this video of how Caillou became bald. [[https://youtu.be/J-Uaw9pCESA]] I know that there are plenty of those out there, [[DudeNotFunny but I took offense to this one]]. [[spoiler:In the video I mentioned, [[MoralEventHorizon Boris gives Caillou cancer by taking him to Chernobyl and making him jump in a lake of radiation poison. Six months later, Caillou gets diagnosed with cancer from the poison and loses all his hair from the chemotherapy. What makes it worse is that Boris feels no remorse and acts as if it was not a big deal.]] ]] [[AbusiveParents Boris was not only a heartless(like he always is,)]] [[DudeNotFunny but this video could offend people with cancer and their loved ones.]]

to:

* Murvine_Taylor: For me, my dethroning moment of GoAnimate would have to be this video of how Caillou became bald. [[https://youtu.be/J-Uaw9pCESA]] I know that there are plenty of those out there, [[DudeNotFunny but I took offense to this one]]. [[spoiler:In the video I mentioned, [[MoralEventHorizon Boris gives Caillou cancer by taking him to Chernobyl and making him jump in a lake of radiation poison. Six months later, Caillou gets diagnosed with cancer from the poison and loses all his hair from the chemotherapy. What makes it worse is that Boris feels no remorse and acts as if it was not a big deal.]] ]] ]]]] [[AbusiveParents Boris was not only a heartless(like heartless person (like he always is,)]] is)]], [[DudeNotFunny but this video could offend people with cancer and their loved ones.]]
12th Apr '17 5:29:30 PM Murvine_Taylor
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Murvine_Taylor: For me, my dethroning moment of GoAnimate would have to be this video of how Caillou became bald. [[https://youtu.be/J-Uaw9pCESA]] I know that there are plenty of those out there, [[DudeNotFunny but I took offense to this one]]. [[spoiler:In the video I mentioned, [[MoralEventHorizon Boris gives Caillou cancer by taking to Chernobyl and making him jump in a lake of radiation poison. Six months later, Caillou gets diagnosed with cancer from the poison and loses all his hair from the chemotherapy. What makes it worse is that Boris feels no remorse and acts as if it was not a big deal.]] ]] [[AbusiveParents Boris was not only a heartless(like he always is,)]] [[DudeNotFunny but this video could offend people with cancer and their loved ones.]]

to:

* Murvine_Taylor: For me, my dethroning moment of GoAnimate would have to be this video of how Caillou became bald. [[https://youtu.be/J-Uaw9pCESA]] I know that there are plenty of those out there, [[DudeNotFunny but I took offense to this one]]. [[spoiler:In the video I mentioned, [[MoralEventHorizon Boris gives Caillou cancer by taking him to Chernobyl and making him jump in a lake of radiation poison. Six months later, Caillou gets diagnosed with cancer from the poison and loses all his hair from the chemotherapy. What makes it worse is that Boris feels no remorse and acts as if it was not a big deal.]] ]] [[AbusiveParents Boris was not only a heartless(like he always is,)]] [[DudeNotFunny but this video could offend people with cancer and their loved ones.]]
12th Apr '17 12:12:54 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


'''GoAnimate''': I'm gonna publish some [[DethroningMomentOfSuck Dethroning Moments of Suck]] while nobody is looking. [[EvilLaugh Hahahahaha.]]

to:

--> '''GoAnimate''': I'm gonna publish some [[DethroningMomentOfSuck Dethroning Moments of Suck]] while nobody is looking. [[EvilLaugh Hahahahaha.]]]] (''points ahead'')
12th Apr '17 12:08:50 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[folder:GoAnimate]]
'''GoAnimate''': I'm gonna publise some [[DethroningMomentOfSuck Dethroning Moments of Suck]] while nobody is looking. [[EvilLaugh Hahahahaha.]]

to:

[[folder:GoAnimate]]
[[folder:[=GoAnimate=]]]
'''GoAnimate''': I'm gonna publise publish some [[DethroningMomentOfSuck Dethroning Moments of Suck]] while nobody is looking. [[EvilLaugh Hahahahaha.]]
12th Apr '17 12:07:05 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** fanboy95: I also find GoAnimate videos of WesternAnimation/{{Caillou}} and [[WesternAnimation/DoraTheExplorer Dora]] getting grounded to be amusing for similar reasons to the above. However, I was disgusted by Isaac Anderson Animation's video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISMkZvDI1dg Caillou Pees on the Teacher/Assaulted]], where [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin Caillou is assaulted by his Dad]] for [[DisproportionateRetribution peeing on the teacher]]. What shocked me was that, as "punishment", Caillou [[GroinAttack gets his penis cut off]] [[AbusiveParents by his father]] who then [[{{Squick}} defecates in his mouth]] and then [[WouldHurtAChild chases him down to kill him]]... [[NoEnding and that's how it ends]]. Whereas the punishments are usually absurd as are the things that Caillou, Dora and other characters do to prompt them, this was just plain disturbing and cruel. [[FromBadtoWorse As if that wasn't bad enough]], [[FollowTheLeader plenty of GoAnimate users began making videos of characters getting "assaulted"/killed by their parents after that]]. While I still continue to watch other "grounded" videos as a guilty pleasure, I will probably not forget how bad it was, all things considered.
** Murvine_Taylor: For me, my dethroning moment of GoAnimate would have to be this video of how Caillou became bald. [[https://youtu.be/J-Uaw9pCESA]] I know that there are plenty of those out there, [[DudeNotFunny but I took offense to this one]]. [[spoiler:In the video I mentioned, [[MoralEventHorizon Boris gives Caillou cancer by taking to Chernobyl and making him jump in a lake of radiation poison. Six months later, Caillou gets diagnosed with cancer from the poison and loses all his hair from the chemotherapy. What makes it worse is that Boris feels no remorse and acts as if it was not a big deal.]] ]] [[AbusiveParents Boris was not only a heartless(like he always is,)]] [[DudeNotFunny but this video could offend people with cancer and their loved ones.]]
'''GoAnimate's Mother''': OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH! GOANIMATE! HOW DARE YOU HAVE THESE UNPLEASANT MOMENTS? THAT'S IT! [[YouAreGrounded YOU'RE GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED FOR 1234567890 YEARS!]] GO TO YOUR ROOM NOW!

to:

** * fanboy95: I also find GoAnimate videos of WesternAnimation/{{Caillou}} and [[WesternAnimation/DoraTheExplorer Dora]] getting grounded to be amusing for similar reasons to the above. However, I was disgusted by Isaac Anderson Animation's video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISMkZvDI1dg Caillou Pees on the Teacher/Assaulted]], where [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin Caillou is assaulted by his Dad]] for [[DisproportionateRetribution peeing on the teacher]]. What shocked me was that, as "punishment", Caillou [[GroinAttack gets his penis cut off]] [[AbusiveParents by his father]] who then [[{{Squick}} defecates in his mouth]] and then [[WouldHurtAChild chases him down to kill him]]... [[NoEnding and that's how it ends]]. Whereas the punishments are usually absurd as are the things that Caillou, Dora and other characters do to prompt them, this was just plain disturbing and cruel. [[FromBadtoWorse As if that wasn't bad enough]], [[FollowTheLeader plenty of GoAnimate users began making videos of characters getting "assaulted"/killed by their parents after that]]. While I still continue to watch other "grounded" videos as a guilty pleasure, I will probably not forget how bad it was, all things considered.
** * Murvine_Taylor: For me, my dethroning moment of GoAnimate would have to be this video of how Caillou became bald. [[https://youtu.be/J-Uaw9pCESA]] I know that there are plenty of those out there, [[DudeNotFunny but I took offense to this one]]. [[spoiler:In the video I mentioned, [[MoralEventHorizon Boris gives Caillou cancer by taking to Chernobyl and making him jump in a lake of radiation poison. Six months later, Caillou gets diagnosed with cancer from the poison and loses all his hair from the chemotherapy. What makes it worse is that Boris feels no remorse and acts as if it was not a big deal.]] ]] [[AbusiveParents Boris was not only a heartless(like he always is,)]] [[DudeNotFunny but this video could offend people with cancer and their loved ones.]]
'''GoAnimate's Mother''': OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH! GOANIMATE! HOW DARE YOU HAVE THESE UNPLEASANT MOMENTS? THAT'S IT! [[YouAreGrounded YOU'RE GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED FOR 1234567890 YEARS!]] GO TO YOUR ROOM NOW!
]]
12th Apr '17 12:06:24 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[folder:GoAnimate]]
'''GoAnimate''': I'm gonna publise some [[DethroningMomentOfSuck Dethroning Moments of Suck]] while nobody is looking. [[EvilLaugh Hahahahaha.]]
* Kablammin45: Website/GoAnimate "Grounded" videos are something of a [[BileFascination guilty pleasure of mine]], and there are a few I sometimes watch over and over again just because of how [[{{Narm}} unintentionally hilarious]] they are. However, words cannot describe how infuriating [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NUh6LmjVgY this particular video]] (specifically its [[DownerEnding outrageously mean-spirited ending]]) was to me. Basically, WesternAnimation/{{Caillou}}'s dad/Boris decides to go rob a bank, but Caillou foils Boris's plans by calling the police. What pushed me to cite this as my Dethroning Moment here? Caillou doesn't just get grounded, he winds up arrested for ''life'' just for being a baby show character, [[NoGoodDeedGoesUnpunished despite doing something heroic for once]]. Meanwhile, the police give Boris a luxury jail cell with a full bathroom and TV and allow him to beat up Caillou whenever he wants...just because he doesn't like Caillou. So basically, [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic Boris]] commits a felony [[KarmaHoudini and gets rewarded in the end (aside from being in jail)]] just because the [[PoliceAreUseless police]] side with him over [[UnintentionallySympathetic Caillou]], [[YankTheDogsChain who gets the raw end of the deal]] despite actually doing something good for once. I know that the fanbase hates Caillou and other baby show characters, but, honestly, I don't see how the user [[EsotericHappyEnding thought this was an ending]] [[MoralDissonance everyone would agree with]]. (Even the comments section is full of people [[WhatTheHellPlayer calling him out]] over this, so it isn't just me who feels this way.)
** fanboy95: I also find GoAnimate videos of WesternAnimation/{{Caillou}} and [[WesternAnimation/DoraTheExplorer Dora]] getting grounded to be amusing for similar reasons to the above. However, I was disgusted by Isaac Anderson Animation's video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISMkZvDI1dg Caillou Pees on the Teacher/Assaulted]], where [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin Caillou is assaulted by his Dad]] for [[DisproportionateRetribution peeing on the teacher]]. What shocked me was that, as "punishment", Caillou [[GroinAttack gets his penis cut off]] [[AbusiveParents by his father]] who then [[{{Squick}} defecates in his mouth]] and then [[WouldHurtAChild chases him down to kill him]]... [[NoEnding and that's how it ends]]. Whereas the punishments are usually absurd as are the things that Caillou, Dora and other characters do to prompt them, this was just plain disturbing and cruel. [[FromBadtoWorse As if that wasn't bad enough]], [[FollowTheLeader plenty of GoAnimate users began making videos of characters getting "assaulted"/killed by their parents after that]]. While I still continue to watch other "grounded" videos as a guilty pleasure, I will probably not forget how bad it was, all things considered.
** Murvine_Taylor: For me, my dethroning moment of GoAnimate would have to be this video of how Caillou became bald. [[https://youtu.be/J-Uaw9pCESA]] I know that there are plenty of those out there, [[DudeNotFunny but I took offense to this one]]. [[spoiler:In the video I mentioned, [[MoralEventHorizon Boris gives Caillou cancer by taking to Chernobyl and making him jump in a lake of radiation poison. Six months later, Caillou gets diagnosed with cancer from the poison and loses all his hair from the chemotherapy. What makes it worse is that Boris feels no remorse and acts as if it was not a big deal.]] ]] [[AbusiveParents Boris was not only a heartless(like he always is,)]] [[DudeNotFunny but this video could offend people with cancer and their loved ones.]]
'''GoAnimate's Mother''': OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH! GOANIMATE! HOW DARE YOU HAVE THESE UNPLEASANT MOMENTS? THAT'S IT! [[YouAreGrounded YOU'RE GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED FOR 1234567890 YEARS!]] GO TO YOUR ROOM NOW!
[[/folder]]



* JEFFWONTLEAVE: I never had much interest in the Webvideo/ReactionAndReview series. Mostly because I usually don’t like either [[Main/ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin reactions or “I Just Got Done Watching!”-like reviews]], but also because I knew the creator, Emer Prevost, for having produced a great amount of rants beforehand that came across as a {{Main/Jerkass}} giving very poorly constructed arguments which have not aged very well at all. That being said, unlike most of his {{Main/Hatedom}} I didn’t think much about his work beyond that and just decided to let the people who like his content enjoy it. That was changed, however, when he decided to leave a [[Main/SeriousBusiness super serious comment]] on a [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Olgmy-zkRvU parody video by gurigorloX]] satirizing the commentary community, more specifically [[https://www.youtube.com/user/youngbloodfantasy91?feature=hovercard youngbloodfantasy91.]] The comment was a preachy piece of misinformed trash like his old rants, but the real point that made it more [[Main/TookALevelInDumbass mind numbingly irritating than those]] was when he said that Commentaries are not fair use. First off, yes they are. It is part of the Criticism aspect of Fair use. Tons of videos can be technically qualified as commentaries like let's plays, reaction’s and review’s. Second, if this was all true, then why is he friends with people like [[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNUaZV8G_9ntqql0_lgFkTw/videos Clay Claymore]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/user/Bluemagus?feature=hovercard Bluemagus]] who are known for doing commentaries and having associations (albeit minor) with the community and/or people from it? And lastly, you know those type of videos I mentioned in my first point? [[{{Main/Hypocrite}} They are what make up his entire channel and his main show]]. If this is just as much a violation of the guidelines as he says it is, what’s his excuse?

to:

* JEFFWONTLEAVE: I never had much interest in the Webvideo/ReactionAndReview series. Mostly because I usually don’t like either [[Main/ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin reactions or “I Just Got Done Watching!”-like reviews]], but also because I knew the creator, Emer Prevost, for having produced a great amount of rants beforehand that came across as a {{Main/Jerkass}} giving very poorly constructed arguments which have not aged very well at all. That being said, unlike most of his {{Main/Hatedom}} I didn’t think much about his work beyond that and just decided to let the people who like his content enjoy it. That was changed, however, when he decided to leave a [[Main/SeriousBusiness super serious comment]] on a [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Olgmy-zkRvU parody video by gurigorloX]] satirizing the commentary community, more specifically [[https://www.youtube.com/user/youngbloodfantasy91?feature=hovercard youngbloodfantasy91.]] The comment was a preachy piece of misinformed trash like his old rants, but the real point that made it more [[Main/TookALevelInDumbass mind numbingly irritating than those]] was when he said that Commentaries are not fair use. First off, yes they are. It is part of the Criticism aspect of Fair use. Tons of videos can be technically qualified as commentaries like let's plays, reaction’s and review’s. Second, if this was all true, then why is he friends with people like [[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNUaZV8G_9ntqql0_lgFkTw/videos Clay Claymore]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/user/Bluemagus?feature=hovercard Bluemagus]] who are known for doing commentaries and having associations (albeit minor) with the community and/or people from it? And lastly, you know those type of videos I mentioned in my first point? [[{{Main/Hypocrite}} They are what make up his entire channel and his main show]]. If this is just as much a violation of the guidelines as he says it is, what’s what’s his excuse?



* Kablammin45: Website/GoAnimate "Grounded" videos are something of a [[BileFascination guilty pleasure of mine]], and there are a few I sometimes watch over and over again just because of how [[{{Narm}} unintentionally hilarious]] they are. However, words cannot describe how infuriating [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NUh6LmjVgY this particular video]] (specifically its [[DownerEnding outrageously mean-spirited ending]]) was to me. Basically, WesternAnimation/{{Caillou}}'s dad/Boris decides to go rob a bank, but Caillou foils Boris's plans by calling the police. What pushed me to cite this as my Dethroning Moment here? Caillou doesn't just get grounded, he winds up arrested for ''life'' just for being a baby show character, [[NoGoodDeedGoesUnpunished despite doing something heroic for once]]. Meanwhile, the police give Boris a luxury jail cell with a full bathroom and TV and allow him to beat up Caillou whenever he wants...just because he doesn't like Caillou. So basically, [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic Boris]] commits a felony [[KarmaHoudini and gets rewarded in the end (aside from being in jail)]] just because the [[PoliceAreUseless police]] side with him over [[UnintentionallySympathetic Caillou]], [[YankTheDogsChain who gets the raw end of the deal]] despite actually doing something good for once. I know that the fanbase hates Caillou and other baby show characters, but, honestly, I don't see how the user [[EsotericHappyEnding thought this was an ending]] [[MoralDissonance everyone would agree with]]. (Even the comments section is full of people [[WhatTheHellPlayer calling him out]] over this, so it isn't just me who feels this way.)
** fanboy95: I also find GoAnimate videos of WesternAnimation/{{Caillou}} and [[WesternAnimation/DoraTheExplorer Dora]] getting grounded to be amusing for similar reasons to the above. However, I was disgusted by Isaac Anderson Animation's video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISMkZvDI1dg Caillou Pees on the Teacher/Assaulted]], where [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin Caillou is assaulted by his Dad]] for [[DisproportionateRetribution peeing on the teacher]]. What shocked me was that, as "punishment", Caillou [[GroinAttack gets his penis cut off]] [[AbusiveParents by his father]] who then [[{{Squick}} defecates in his mouth]] and then [[WouldHurtAChild chases him down to kill him]]... [[NoEnding and that's how it ends]]. Whereas the punishments are usually absurd as are the things that Caillou, Dora and other characters do to prompt them, this was just plain disturbing and cruel. [[FromBadtoWorse As if that wasn't bad enough]], [[FollowTheLeader plenty of GoAnimate users began making videos of characters getting "assaulted"/killed by their parents after that]]. While I still continue to watch other "grounded" videos as a guilty pleasure, I will probably not forget how bad it was, all things considered.
** Murvine_Taylor: For me, my dethroning moment of GoAnimate would have to be this video of how Caillou became bald. [[https://youtu.be/J-Uaw9pCESA]] I know that there are plenty of those out there, [[DudeNotFunny but I took offense to this one]]. [[spoiler:In the video I mentioned, [[MoralEventHorizon Boris gives Caillou cancer by taking to Chernobyl and making him jump in a lake of radiation poison. Six months later, Caillou gets diagnosed with cancer from the poison and loses all his hair from the chemotherapy. What makes it worse is that Boris feels no remorse and acts as if it was not a big deal.]] ]] [[AbusiveParents Boris was not only a heartless(like he always is,)]] [[DudeNotFunny but this video could offend people with cancer and their loved ones.]]



* Tropers/TommyTiger: There's an awful video on the internet. It revolves about {{WesternAnimation/Tom|and Jerry}} killing Jerry (this video is so messed up I'm not even providing a link!). I don't find Jerry to be mean, unlike other people, but I can understand why some people think of that. It shows Jerry getting killed by Tom with an axe, leading to [[NightmareFuel a pool of blood (no joking) covering him (Jerry)]]. In other words, Jerry gets brutally killed by [[RonTheDeathEater Tom]]. Without a trace of GoryDiscretionShot. [[ProtagonistCenteredMorality And this is treated as a good thing!]] So this video basically implies that [[JerkassWoobie the poor mouse]] deserves to die [[DisproportionateRetribution just because he defends himself from Tom with more meanness than should]]. [[EveryoneHasStandards Not even canon Tom would stoop that low!]] But apparently it's okay for the Tom in this video to slaughter Jerry like this because [[FelonyMisdemeanor he (mostly understandably) pesters him]]. [[SarcasmMode Because that's totally a reasonable and sane reaction!]] I will never forgive the blatant [[{{Hypocrite}} hypocrisy]] in that person's criticism (which was already overly scathing and gruesome to start with). This crosses both BlackComedy and AuthorTract, going more into DudeNotFunny territory. Even I'd draw the line at, let say, WesternAnimation/PeppaPig getting her head slammed into a coat hanger, causing her to become paralyzed, then her chest cut open and her still-beating heart being ripped out until she bleeds to death.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: There's an awful video on the internet. It revolves about {{WesternAnimation/Tom|and Jerry}} killing Jerry (this video is so messed up I'm not even providing a link!). I don't find Jerry to be mean, unlike other people, but I can understand why some people think of that. It shows Jerry getting killed by Tom with an axe, leading to [[NightmareFuel ''[[NightmareFuel a pool of blood (no joking) covering him (Jerry)]].(Jerry)]]''. In other words, Jerry gets brutally killed by [[RonTheDeathEater Tom]]. Without a trace of GoryDiscretionShot. [[ProtagonistCenteredMorality And this is treated as a good thing!]] So this video basically implies that [[JerkassWoobie the poor mouse]] deserves to die [[DisproportionateRetribution just because he defends himself from Tom with more meanness than should]]. [[EveryoneHasStandards Not even canon Tom would stoop that low!]] But apparently it's okay for the Tom in this video to slaughter Jerry like this because [[FelonyMisdemeanor he (mostly understandably) pesters him]]. [[SarcasmMode Because that's totally a reasonable and sane reaction!]] I will never forgive the blatant [[{{Hypocrite}} hypocrisy]] in that person's criticism (which was already overly scathing and gruesome to start with). This crosses both BlackComedy and AuthorTract, going more into DudeNotFunny territory. Even I'd draw the line at, let say, WesternAnimation/PeppaPig getting her head slammed into a coat hanger, causing her to become paralyzed, then her chest cut open and her still-beating heart being ripped out until she bleeds to death.
11th Apr '17 11:56:49 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.

to:

** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified, begging him not to and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks: "Party Animal"! And it was one of the first times I wanted to strangle a fictional character. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.
10th Apr '17 11:20:46 PM alienhunter
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/Alienhunter: I used to love watching LetsPlay/{{Markiplier}}, never missing a video that he uploaded. But ever since I watched his video on Bendy and the Ink Machine, I can't help but feel like he really is overreacting to everything, trying way too hard to be funny and pretending to be scared by everything, even if just a shadow. So whenever he gets around to finishing FiveNightsAtCandys 3, I don't know if I'll ever watch another video of his again.

to:

* Tropers/Alienhunter: Tropers/{{alienhunter}}: I used to love watching LetsPlay/{{Markiplier}}, never missing a video that he uploaded. But ever since I watched his video on Bendy and the Ink Machine, I can't help but feel like he really is overreacting to everything, trying way too hard to be funny and pretending to be scared by everything, even if just a shadow. So whenever he gets around to finishing FiveNightsAtCandys 3, I don't know if I'll ever watch another video of his again.again without feeling like it's tainted.
10th Apr '17 11:19:40 PM alienhunter
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/Alienhunter: I used to love watching LetsPlay/{{Markiplier}}, never missing a video that he uploaded. But ever since I watched his video on Bendy and the Ink Machine, I can't help but feel like he really is overreacting to everything, trying way too hard to be funny and pretending to be scared by everything, even if just a shadow. So whenever he gets around to finishing FiveNightsAtCandys 3, I don't know if I'll ever watch another video of his again.
10th Apr '17 10:42:11 AM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[folder: ScrewAttack]]
* Bengson26: ScrewAttack's Top 5 Free-To-Play Games has this moment. Here, Nick says that in ''VideoGame/TeamFortress2'' (I'm really talking about [=TF2=] a lot here, huh?), weapons with real advantages are locked behind a paywall. This just reeks with CriticalResearchFailure. First off, while admittedly there is a massive market for weapons in [=TF2=], you could get weapons at random via a drop system. Second, none of the weapons have real advantages since they're sidegrades. Screwattack, there's a rule whenever you make Top 10 lists. It's called do your fucking research!
* Sugarp1e1: I didn't appreciate the seventh entry of ScrewAttack's [[https://youtu.be/fZuki3QTb2s Top 10 Worst Cartoons Based on Video Games list]]; [[spoiler:BlazBlue: Alter Memory.]] It's not the fact that Nervous Nick doesn't like [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] that's the problem (I've never even played the game or watched the anime). As with my PhantomStrider entry above, my problem with this list is his reason for putting it on the list as well as his elitist attitude about the whole thing. He starts the entry off by making it clear that he doesn't like the game's world or story, having a very PlayTheGameSkipTheStory attitude about it. Okay, fine. But judging by the clips of the anime he used, [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is actually a pretty faithful adaptation. So why is it bad according to Nick? [[BiasSteamroller Because it's a faithful adaptation of a game he never liked to begin with.]] His bias behind this is clear, what with him spending the entire entry summarizing the story in way that makes it sound even more confusing than it really is (instead of just explaining why he finds it confusing) and ending the entry with him absolutely losing his [[PrecisionFStrike shit]] over how much he hates [[spoiler:BlazBlue]]'s story (especially the whole [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] plot point), claiming "I see [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] for what it really is! It's a mess! I hate it! That's why it's #7." Um, Nick? [[OpinionMyopia Are you implying that the people who do like the story are idiotic sheep?]] To me, it sounds like he's genuinely proclaiming himself to be [[FanHater better than the fans]] because he can't get past the story. Don't get me wrong; I totally agree that the [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] is confusing, especially at the end when [[spoiler:the cycle is finally broken]], but I wouldn't yell at my audience that "The story sucks!" in a way that suggests my subjective opinion is objective fact. And considering how he goes from screaming his lungs out to calmly moving on to #6, it was PlayedForLaughs. You probably also noticed that this DMOS sounds more like I'm talking about the game and not the anime. Nick's tirade was the same way. On top of all that, [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking #7 was the only entry on the list that wasn't an adaptation of a game he liked.]] If he never liked [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] to begin with, then he's in no position to tell us that [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is a bad adaptation just because it's faithful to the source material.

to:

[[folder: ScrewAttack]]
[=ScrewAttack=]]]
* Bengson26: ScrewAttack's Website/ScrewAttack's Top 5 Free-To-Play Games has this moment. Here, Nick says that in ''VideoGame/TeamFortress2'' (I'm really talking about [=TF2=] a lot here, huh?), weapons with real advantages are locked behind a paywall. This just reeks with CriticalResearchFailure. First off, while admittedly there is a massive market for weapons in [=TF2=], you could get weapons at random via a drop system. Second, none of the weapons have real advantages since they're sidegrades. Screwattack, there's a rule whenever you make Top 10 lists. It's called do your fucking research!
* Sugarp1e1: I didn't appreciate the seventh entry of ScrewAttack's Website/ScrewAttack's [[https://youtu.be/fZuki3QTb2s Top 10 Worst Cartoons Based on Video Games list]]; [[spoiler:BlazBlue: Alter Memory.]] It's not the fact that Nervous Nick doesn't like [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] that's the problem (I've never even played the game or watched the anime). As with my PhantomStrider entry above, my problem with this list is his reason for putting it on the list as well as his elitist attitude about the whole thing. He starts the entry off by making it clear that he doesn't like the game's world or story, having a very PlayTheGameSkipTheStory attitude about it. Okay, fine. But judging by the clips of the anime he used, [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is actually a pretty faithful adaptation. So why is it bad according to Nick? [[BiasSteamroller Because it's a faithful adaptation of a game he never liked to begin with.]] His bias behind this is clear, what with him spending the entire entry summarizing the story in way that makes it sound even more confusing than it really is (instead of just explaining why he finds it confusing) and ending the entry with him absolutely losing his [[PrecisionFStrike shit]] over how much he hates [[spoiler:BlazBlue]]'s story (especially the whole [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] plot point), claiming "I see [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] for what it really is! It's a mess! I hate it! That's why it's #7." Um, Nick? [[OpinionMyopia Are you implying that the people who do like the story are idiotic sheep?]] To me, it sounds like he's genuinely proclaiming himself to be [[FanHater better than the fans]] because he can't get past the story. Don't get me wrong; I totally agree that the [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] is confusing, especially at the end when [[spoiler:the cycle is finally broken]], but I wouldn't yell at my audience that "The story sucks!" in a way that suggests my subjective opinion is objective fact. And considering how he goes from screaming his lungs out to calmly moving on to #6, it was PlayedForLaughs. You probably also noticed that this DMOS sounds more like I'm talking about the game and not the anime. Nick's tirade was the same way. On top of all that, [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking #7 was the only entry on the list that wasn't an adaptation of a game he liked.]] If he never liked [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] to begin with, then he's in no position to tell us that [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is a bad adaptation just because it's faithful to the source material.
9th Apr '17 8:24:25 PM Murvine_Taylor
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Murvine_Taylor: For me, my dethroning moment of GoAnimate would have to be this video of how Caillou became bald. [[https://youtu.be/J-Uaw9pCESA]] I know that there are plenty of those out there, [[DudeNotFunny but I took offense to this one]]. [[spoiler:In the video I mentioned, [[MoralEventHorizon Boris gives Caillou cancer by taking to Chernobyl and making him jump in a lake of radiation poison. Six months later, Caillou gets diagnosed with cancer from the poison and loses all his hair from the chemotherapy. What makes it worse is that Boris feels no remorse and acts as if it was not a big deal.]] ]] [[AbusiveParents Boris was not only a heartless(like he always is,)]] [[DudeNotFunny but this video could offend people with cancer and their loved ones.]]
9th Apr '17 1:35:22 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/{{Jonn}}: ''anachronauts'' arc 3, fs03. The female elf Nel was rescued by and fell in love with space-girl Una, [[IncompatibleOrientation who is straight]]. Okay, plenty of healthy relationships have grown out of a RescueRomance. She doesn't tell her. Okay, that's reasonable. Nel [[http://xkcd.com/513/ decides to devote her life to being Una's best friend]]. [[UnfortunateImplications Um, what?]] Nel never gets any significant characterization, background, or personality traits other than being in love with Una. [[SatelliteLoveInterest Hmm]]. [[spoiler:Nel is tempted by a genie to kill one of the other Anachronauts in order to have Una. She refuses, saying that she'd rather have Una naturally. You go, girl. And then in fs03, Una gets her hands on the sense-recording earrings Nel has been wearing since the beginning of the arc, and is able to effectively be Nel as she talked to the Genie, including her declaration of love. She re-evaluates her interactions with Nel, and then instantly realizes she loves her. Please note that Una has been exclusively heterosexual up to this point, and realizing she likes girls in general and loves Nel in particular is portrayed as [[SuddenlySexuality basically flipping a switch]]. Oh, and the author pretty clearly [[AuthorAppeal has a fetish for lesbians]], as it popped up in his earlier ''SailorNothing'', and in an aside in arc 2. Their friendship is written as exactly that; a friendship, with no romantic or sexual tension. Compared to the other romances in the series, which are written much more organically, it seems more like a StrangledByTheRedString RomanticPlotTumor than an actual romance. Nel and Una are given some "private time" at the end of that chapter, which would be ideal for showing their conversation before the inevitable sex and underlining the fact that they actually do have feelings for each other, except we never get to see it.]] Did I mention that there had been no other significant LGBT characters in the series up to that point? Yes, that's right, the only known homosexual is there for solely for the purpose of catering to {{fetish}}es. It's kinda creepy, and I couldn't read the series after that.

to:

* Tropers/{{Jonn}}: ''anachronauts'' arc 3, fs03. The female elf Nel was rescued by and fell in love with space-girl Una, [[IncompatibleOrientation who is straight]]. Okay, plenty of healthy relationships have grown out of a RescueRomance. She doesn't tell her. Okay, that's reasonable. Nel [[http://xkcd.com/513/ decides to devote her life to being Una's best friend]]. [[UnfortunateImplications Um, what?]] Nel never gets any significant characterization, background, or personality traits other than being in love with Una. [[SatelliteLoveInterest Hmm]]. [[spoiler:Nel is tempted by a genie to kill one of the other Anachronauts in order to have Una. She refuses, saying that she'd rather have Una naturally. You go, girl. And then in fs03, Una gets her hands on the sense-recording earrings Nel has been wearing since the beginning of the arc, and is able to effectively be Nel as she talked to the Genie, including her declaration of love. She re-evaluates her interactions with Nel, and then instantly realizes she loves her. Please note that Una has been exclusively heterosexual up to this point, and realizing she likes girls in general and loves Nel in particular is portrayed as [[SuddenlySexuality basically flipping a switch]]. Oh, and the author pretty clearly [[AuthorAppeal has a fetish for lesbians]], as it popped up in his earlier ''SailorNothing'', ''Literature/SailorNothing'', and in an aside in arc 2. Their friendship is written as exactly that; a friendship, with no romantic or sexual tension. Compared to the other romances in the series, which are written much more organically, it seems more like a StrangledByTheRedString RomanticPlotTumor than an actual romance. Nel and Una are given some "private time" at the end of that chapter, which would be ideal for showing their conversation before the inevitable sex and underlining the fact that they actually do have feelings for each other, except we never get to see it.]] Did I mention that there had been no other significant LGBT characters in the series up to that point? Yes, that's right, the only known homosexual is there for solely for the purpose of catering to {{fetish}}es. It's kinda creepy, and I couldn't read the series after that.
9th Apr '17 10:58:15 AM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Falconwing: ''Machinima/RedVsBlue'' Season 13, episode 20. Three whole seasons of buildup. Twenty episodes of speculation, and they end with... a cliffhanger. Maybe for a lesser web series, this would be passable, but I expected better from RoosterTeeth. This ending felt like they literally spit in my face.

to:

* Falconwing: ''Machinima/RedVsBlue'' Season 13, episode 20. Three whole seasons of buildup. Twenty episodes of speculation, and they end with... a cliffhanger. Maybe for a lesser web series, this would be passable, but I expected better from RoosterTeeth.Creator/RoosterTeeth. This ending felt like they literally spit in my face.
9th Apr '17 10:46:22 AM CumbersomeTercel
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* WhyNotNow: While I enjoy SF Debris's reviews and all the good points he brings up, there was still one instance that stuck with me for a very long time which almost threatened to destroy the show for me; when he says in his Angel One review how he was asked once if working with women made him feel uncomfortable and he said nothing because he thought it was stupid. That right there reveals his mindset and made me very uncomfortable; that it's almost like he can't grasp the fact that women are an oppressed group in the United States. But it doesn't end there when he goes on to say how he burst out at them, which he rather insensitively and smugly affirms they appreciated, which actually made me feel a little dirty inside because it's as though he was saying he was fully justified in being cruel to an actually oppressed group since it's treating them "equally" and that they don't have a legitimate reason to feel that way with all the sexism and anti-woman policies present in the United States today. And from all he's said over the years, it turns out I'm not the only one to come to this (hopefully mistaken) conclusion as he has had to repeatedly protest over and over again that he doesn't have a problem with women, which I really hope is true, but given his track record so far, it's very hard to believe especially because he's even admitted he's a shallow and insensitive asshole. At least he's gotten better with time and has nowhere near come even close to approaching that level of offensiveness since then.
** Vexer: For me it's his stupid, obnoxious and incredibly childish hate-boner for RobLiefeld, I know people have reasons not to like him, but this dumbass just goes way too far(suggesting one of his comics killed somebody? LOL yeah right!) in his incessant, whiny bitching about him. His pathetic speech in "The Rise and Fall of the Comics Empire part 3" being his absolute worst, saying he's not sorry for attacking Liefeld and ignoring the many legitimate reasons he had for leaving Marvel and most pathetic of all, saying he would "lose credibility" with comics fans for being "too nice" to Liefeld, which is a complete load of bullshit, comic fans aren't going to riot over something like that, way to stereotype your own audience dumbfuck!

to:

* WhyNotNow: While I enjoy SF Debris's WebVideo/SFDebris's reviews and all the good points he brings up, there was still one instance that stuck with me for a very long time which almost threatened to destroy the show for me; when he says in his "[[{{Recap/StarTrekTheNextGenerationS1E13AngelOne}} Angel One One]]" review how he was asked once if working with women made him feel uncomfortable and he said nothing because he thought it was stupid. That right there reveals his mindset and made me very uncomfortable; that it's almost like he can't grasp the fact that women are an oppressed group in the United States. But it doesn't end there when he goes on to say how he burst out at them, which he rather insensitively and smugly affirms they appreciated, which actually made me feel a little dirty inside because it's as though he was saying he was fully justified in being cruel to an actually oppressed group since it's treating them "equally" and that they don't have a legitimate reason to feel that way with all the sexism and anti-woman policies present in the United States today. And from all he's said over the years, it turns out I'm not the only one to come to this (hopefully mistaken) conclusion as he has had to repeatedly protest over and over again that he doesn't have a problem with women, which I really hope is true, but given his track record so far, it's very hard to believe especially because he's even admitted he's a shallow and insensitive asshole. At least he's gotten better with time and has nowhere near come even close to approaching that level of offensiveness since then.
** Vexer: For me it's his stupid, obnoxious and incredibly childish hate-boner for RobLiefeld, Creator//RobLiefeld, I know people have reasons not to like him, but this dumbass just goes way too far(suggesting far (suggesting one of his comics killed somebody? LOL yeah right!) in his incessant, whiny bitching about him. His pathetic speech in "The Rise and Fall of the Comics Empire part 3" being his absolute worst, saying he's not sorry for attacking Liefeld and ignoring the many legitimate reasons he had for leaving Marvel and most pathetic of all, saying he would "lose credibility" with comics fans for being "too nice" to Liefeld, which is a complete load of bullshit, comic fans aren't going to riot over something like that, way to stereotype your own audience dumbfuck!



* Sugarp1e1: The [[spoiler:Warcraft]] entry of [[https://youtu.be/iDe5CkaUGho GameSpot's Worst Reviewed Movies of 2016]] rubbed me the wrong way. For the majority of the list, the narrator of this video spent a decent amount of time for each entry explaining why each movie is bad. [[spoiler:Nine Lives]] isn't funny, [[spoiler:The Do-Over]] is yet another braindead Adam Sandler comedy, [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] is just a rehash of the original, etc. But for the [[spoiler:Warcraft]] entry, they decide to just show a single clip of what they expected from the movie and compare it to multiple clips from the actual movie, with FlatWhat reactions thrown in-between, to make the classic "This is what we wanted, but this is what we got. Therefore it sucks" argument. While the argument itself isn't bad, the execution was just...lazy and weak. I know that they were trying to invoke the "It speaks for itself" argument and that if the person watching this video was a [[spoiler:WoW]] fan who agreed with GameSpot's opinion of the movie, it most likely would. But what about all the people who never played the game or watched the movie? If they're anything like me, they'd probably be confused as to why they think the movie is bad. What exactly were they trying to say? That the movie was boring? That it was silly? That it didn't feel the games it was adapted from? I'm just guessing here. Call me stupid, but I don't get it. I'm not saying they should've sat down and spelled it out to us, just that they could've explained why the movie is bad instead of just lazily pasting some clips together with little to no review. Also, in the [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] entry, they state that even Justin Bieber's [[spoiler:death scene]] couldn't save this movie. If the joke ended there, it'd okay. But instead they decide to shoehorn a clip of the infamous scene from CSI where Justin [[spoiler:is shot dead]], despite the fact that CSI has nothing to do with the topic of the list at hand. In other words, they used [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] as an excuse to pander to Justin Bieber's haters and make a "Justin Bieber must die" joke. That, to me, is the equivalent of making an "MC Hammer is broke" joke: an old joke that just isn't funny anymore.

to:

* Sugarp1e1: The [[spoiler:Warcraft]] [[spoiler:''{{Film/Warcraft}}'']] entry of [[https://youtu.be/iDe5CkaUGho GameSpot's Worst Reviewed Movies of 2016]] rubbed me the wrong way. For the majority of the list, the narrator of this video spent a decent amount of time for each entry explaining why each movie is bad. [[spoiler:Nine Lives]] isn't funny, [[spoiler:The Do-Over]] is yet another braindead Adam Sandler comedy, [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] is just a rehash of the original, etc. But for the [[spoiler:Warcraft]] entry, they decide to just show a single clip of what they expected from the movie and compare it to multiple clips from the actual movie, with FlatWhat reactions thrown in-between, to make the classic "This is what we wanted, but this is what we got. Therefore it sucks" argument. While the argument itself isn't bad, the execution was just...lazy and weak. I know that they were trying to invoke the "It speaks for itself" argument and that if the person watching this video was a [[spoiler:WoW]] fan who agreed with GameSpot's opinion of the movie, it most likely would. But what about all the people who never played the game or watched the movie? If they're anything like me, they'd probably be confused as to why they think the movie is bad. What exactly were they trying to say? That the movie was boring? That it was silly? That it didn't feel the games it was adapted from? I'm just guessing here. Call me stupid, but I don't get it. I'm not saying they should've sat down and spelled it out to us, just that they could've explained why the movie is bad instead of just lazily pasting some clips together with little to no review. Also, in the [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] entry, they state that even Justin Bieber's [[spoiler:death scene]] couldn't save this movie. If the joke ended there, it'd okay. But instead they decide to shoehorn a clip of the infamous scene from CSI where Justin [[spoiler:is shot dead]], despite the fact that CSI has nothing to do with the topic of the list at hand. In other words, they used [[spoiler:Zoolander 2]] as an excuse to pander to Justin Bieber's haters and make a "Justin Bieber must die" joke. That, to me, is the equivalent of making an "MC Hammer is broke" joke: an old joke that just isn't funny anymore.



* Tropers/{{Sugarp1e1}}: The 7th entry of TheMetalBlade5's [[https://youtu.be/LUy-iKZDeNk Top 10 Worst Video Game Reviews I've Seen list]]. In the beginning of the video, he claims that he has no problem with people liking something he doesn't and that he was only going to focus on the reviews themselves. Yet when he gets to his 7th entry, he starts going on this long rant about how [[spoiler:Shadow of Memories]] is an objectively bad game and how everyone who gave it a positive review is wrong. This entry felt more like a review on the game than a review on the reviews it got. And the hypocrisy gets worse at the end of the video when he tells the narrator of the #1 review on the list that he should respect people's opinions on the game. I don't know about you, but telling people their objectively wrong for liking something you don't isn't respecting their opinion. [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking Also, his yelling literally gave me a headache]].

to:

* Tropers/{{Sugarp1e1}}: The 7th entry of TheMetalBlade5's WebVideo/TheMetalBlade5's [[https://youtu.be/LUy-iKZDeNk Top 10 Worst Video Game Reviews I've Seen list]]. In the beginning of the video, he claims that he has no problem with people liking something he doesn't and that he was only going to focus on the reviews themselves. Yet when he gets to his 7th entry, he starts going on this long rant about how [[spoiler:Shadow of Memories]] is an objectively bad game and how everyone who gave it a positive review is wrong. This entry felt more like a review on the game than a review on the reviews it got. And the hypocrisy gets worse at the end of the video when he tells the narrator of the #1 review on the list that he should respect people's opinions on the game. I don't know about you, but telling people their objectively wrong for liking something you don't isn't respecting their opinion. [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking Also, his yelling literally gave me a headache]].
9th Apr '17 2:01:01 AM MorphinBrony
Is there an issue? Send a Message
1st Apr '17 10:13:03 PM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: I have a lot of fun at Website/Drawception, but I have a small bone to pick at one drawing. I don't remember what game it was, but that game made me laugh. Then someone talked about his panel in the game being proof that [[RonTheDeathEater Mario is evil]] and my laughs ''came to a screeching end right there''. It was just the old "evil Mario" thing, which is honestly like beating a dead horse.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: I have a lot of fun at Website/Drawception, Website/{{Drawception}}, but I have a small bone to pick at one drawing. I don't remember what game it was, but that game made me laugh. Then someone talked about his panel in the game being proof that [[RonTheDeathEater Mario is evil]] and my laughs ''came to a screeching end right there''. It was just the old "evil Mario" thing, which is honestly like beating a dead horse.
1st Apr '17 1:52:36 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified and begging him to stop]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks! It's "Party Animal"! A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.

to:

** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily carves a piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified and terrified, begging him not to stop]]'' and whimpering like it isn't acting at all]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, carves Nutty like an apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks! It's folks: "Party Animal"! A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.
1st Apr '17 1:47:29 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily cuts a slice off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified and begging him to stop]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the sliced face to shock him and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, [[BodyHorror carves Nutty like an apple]], shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.

to:

** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily cuts carves a slice piece off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified and begging him to stop]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the sliced piece of Toothy's face to shock him in the cruelest way possible and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, [[BodyHorror carves Nutty like an apple]], apple, shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. "Tongue in Cheek" is nothing- here's my nominee for the episode that goes too far even for HTF, folks! It's "Party Animal"! A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.
31st Mar '17 8:17:44 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: I have a lot of fun at Website/Drawception, but I have a small bone to pick at one drawing. I don't remember what game it was, but that game made me laugh. Then someone talked about his panel in the game being proof that [[RonTheDeathEater Mario is evil]] and my laughs ''came to a screeching end right there''. It was just the old "evil Mario" thing, which is honestly like beating a dead horse.
31st Mar '17 5:51:02 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily cuts a slice off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified and begging him to stop]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the sliced face to shock him and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, [[BodyHorror carves Nutty like an apple]], shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.

to:

** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]] Tucker]], [[WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender Fire Lord Ozai]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He gorily cuts a slice off Toothy's face ''[[TheWoobie while the poor guy was terrified and begging him to stop]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the sliced face to shock him and ties some balloons on him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, [[BodyHorror carves Nutty like an apple]], shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.
31st Mar '17 5:47:25 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly murdered Scratchy only, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He [[NauseaFuel cuts a slice off Toothy's face]] ''[[TheWoobie while he was terrified and begging, in true HTF fashion, him to stop]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF actually crossed the line), ties some balloons on Cuddles, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, [[BodyHorror carves Nutty like an apple]], shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.

to:

** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] [[UpToEleven Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly only murdered Scratchy only, Scratchy, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He [[NauseaFuel gorily cuts a slice off Toothy's face]] face ''[[TheWoobie while he the poor guy was terrified and begging, in true HTF fashion, begging him to stop]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]] and was the moment HTF actually really crossed the line), gives Cuddles (''Toothy's best friend'', mind you) the sliced face to shock him and ties some balloons on Cuddles, him, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, [[BodyHorror carves Nutty like an apple]], shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to understand it's a Q and not a P.
31st Mar '17 5:42:31 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that he lost all his likability and would go down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo himself]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] That is, [[UpToEleven even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly murdered Scratchy only, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''Flaky'') [[/note]]. He [[NauseaFuel cuts a slice off Toothy's face]] ''[[TheWoobie while he was terrified and begging, in true HTF fashion, him to stop]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]]), ties some balloons on Cuddles, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, [[BodyHorror carves Nutty like an apple]], shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the [[DudeNotFunny unfunny]] Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. And of course Mondo ''had'' to put him in more episodes.

to:

** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that he lost all his likability the writers [[DudeNotFunny crossed the line]] and would go Fli'''q'''py crossed the MoralEventHorizon, going down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo himself]].Frollo]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] That is, [[UpToEleven even Even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly murdered Scratchy only, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''Flaky'') ''his debatable love interest Flaky'') [[/note]]. He [[NauseaFuel cuts a slice off Toothy's face]] ''[[TheWoobie while he was terrified and begging, in true HTF fashion, him to stop]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]]), sympathy]] and was the moment HTF actually crossed the line), ties some balloons on Cuddles, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, [[BodyHorror carves Nutty like an apple]], shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the [[DudeNotFunny unfunny]] Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. And of course Mondo ''had'' A final note: The reason why I wrote the Q's in Fli'''q'''py in '''bold''' is because I want you to put him in more episodes.understand it's a Q and not a P.
30th Mar '17 7:36:08 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/RetsofNoraa: Creator/RoosterTeeth's Creator/AchievementHunter has one in their video for the "Pay Your Respects" achievement in ''VideoGame/BatmanArkhamCity''. The achievement is - literally - paying your respects at the site where Bruce's parents were killed. Being Rooster Teeth, they try to lighten the situation with humor - claiming the chalk outlines make it look like Martha Wayne was giving a blowjob to Thomas when they died - but instead of [[CrossesTheLineTwice crossing the line twice]], it only crosses the line.

to:

* Tropers/RetsofNoraa: Creator/RoosterTeeth's Creator/AchievementHunter has one in their video for the "Pay Your Respects" achievement in ''VideoGame/BatmanArkhamCity''. The achievement is - literally - paying your respects at the site where Bruce's parents were killed. Being Rooster Teeth, they try to lighten the situation with humor - claiming the chalk outlines make it look like Martha Wayne was giving a blowjob to Thomas when they died - but instead of [[CrossesTheLineTwice crossing the line twice]], [[DudeNotFunny it only crosses the line.line]].



* Tropers/SpongeBat1: I think [=AnimatedJames=] is a fairly decent [=animator/writer=], but what absolutely irks me is his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPRnhXVMpO0 Teen Titans No]] video. As one of the few people who like ''WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGo'', I had a feeling I might not like the video, but I can understand why some people don't like the show and decided I'd give James the benefit of the doubt. It starts off with James' idea of what the TTG writers are like, and surprise, surprise, they're all blithering jackasses. [[SarcasmMode Great start so far.]] But what pushes it over the edge is when Robin throws a hand grenade into the room and [[GoryDiscretionShot gorily kills the writers]]. [[ProtagonistCenteredMorality And this is treated as a good thing.]] So this video basically implies that the TTG writers deserve to die [[DisproportionateRetribution just because James doesn't think the show is funny]]. [[SarcasmMode But wait, it gets better!]] Towards the end of the video, a random producer says that the writers were all mentally handicapped... What? There's BlackComedy, there's an AuthorTract, and then there's just plain offensiveness, and frankly, James, that line crossed it big time.

to:

* Tropers/SpongeBat1: I think [=AnimatedJames=] is a fairly decent [=animator/writer=], but what absolutely irks me is his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPRnhXVMpO0 Teen Titans No]] video. As one of the few people who like ''WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGo'', I had a feeling I might not like the video, but I can understand why some people don't like the show and decided I'd give James the benefit of the doubt. It starts off with James' idea of what the TTG writers are like, and surprise, surprise, they're all blithering jackasses. [[SarcasmMode Great start so far.]] But what pushes it over the edge is when Robin throws a hand grenade into the room and [[GoryDiscretionShot gorily kills the writers]]. [[ProtagonistCenteredMorality And this is treated as a good thing.]] So this video basically implies that the TTG writers deserve to die [[DisproportionateRetribution just because James doesn't think the show is funny]]. [[SarcasmMode But wait, it gets better!]] Towards the end of the video, a random producer says that the writers were all mentally handicapped... What? There's BlackComedy, there's an AuthorTract, and then there's just plain offensiveness, DudeNotFunny, and frankly, James, that line crossed it big time.



* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even though the bit with his friend Ralphthemoviemaker was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny....this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), and worst of all, it's not funny, not even in the black sort of sense. I know Ralph's bit was produced by himself but there was no need for that joke and it soured the video a bit for me (still a damn good video either way, but good lord) due to how unnecessary and hypocritical it was. Also, Ralph avoids using {{Overly Long Gag}}s in his videos for the most part.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even though the bit with his friend Ralphthemoviemaker was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny....this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), and worst of all, [[DudeNotFunny it's not funny, not even in the black sort of sense.sense]]. I know Ralph's bit was produced by himself but there was no need for that joke and it soured the video a bit for me (still a damn good video either way, but good lord) due to how unnecessary and hypocritical it was. Also, Ralph avoids using {{Overly Long Gag}}s in his videos for the most part.



* @/AxMachina: Deleting my previous Media Man rage, I found some more [[DarthWiki/DethroningMomentOfSuck dethroning moments]] under his belt. In two reviews[[note]][[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Reviews-The-Simpsons-428256345 The Simpsons one]], and the [[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Reviews-Home-Alone-1-and-2-419401546 Home Alone one]][[/note]], our CausticCritic says he doesn't like a child character because of him being bratty, or too smart for his own good. Now, this could have been something I could've said was a good point...right up until he had a "joke" where he [[WouldHurtAChild killed one of the characters with a nuclear bomb, and another with a rocket launcher.]] And, to top it all of, in one of the comments calling him out on this, he claims that he's "unique" because of it, then tries to explain himself by saying it was his AuthorAvatar saying it and that [[JustJokingJustification it was supposed to be humorously exaggerated.]] Hey, Media Man. [[{{Hypocrite}} Remember how you said that Bart was evil because he's usually an asshole? How can you say that when you yourself joked about murdering children, and showed no regret, guilt or shame towards your actions because it was a "joke"?]]

to:

* @/AxMachina: Deleting my previous Media Man rage, I found some more [[DarthWiki/DethroningMomentOfSuck dethroning moments]] under his belt. In two reviews[[note]][[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Reviews-The-Simpsons-428256345 The Simpsons one]], and the [[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Reviews-Home-Alone-1-and-2-419401546 Home Alone one]][[/note]], our CausticCritic says he doesn't like a child character because of him being bratty, or too smart for his own good. Now, this could have been something I could've said was a good point...right up until he had a "joke" [[DudeNotFunny "joke"]] where he [[WouldHurtAChild killed one of the characters with a nuclear bomb, and another with a rocket launcher.]] And, to top it all of, in one of the comments calling him out on this, he claims that he's "unique" because of it, then tries to explain himself by saying it was his AuthorAvatar saying it and that [[JustJokingJustification it was supposed to be humorously exaggerated.]] Hey, Media Man. [[{{Hypocrite}} Remember how you said that Bart was evil because he's usually an asshole? How can you say that when you yourself joked about murdering children, and showed no regret, guilt or shame towards your actions because it was a "joke"?]]



From [[CriticalResearchFailure entries that have about as much research in them as the Jimmy McPerson essay]] to jokes that would make Creator/SethMacFarlane shake his head, we count down [[DethroningMomentOfSuck the worst Planet Dolan moments of all time]].

to:

From [[CriticalResearchFailure entries that have about as much research in them as the Jimmy McPerson essay]] to [[DudeNotFunny jokes that would make make]] Creator/SethMacFarlane [[DudeNotFunny shake his head, head]], we count down [[DethroningMomentOfSuck the worst Planet Dolan moments of all time]].



* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: For me, it's when Proto told commentator Kayden Marx, who is in a financial rut and has started a [=GoFundMe=] to have fans donate money for his insurance, that he deserved to be in said rut. And then he had his fans raid [=youngbloodfantasy91=]'s commentary on him and bring the video to an insane and undeserved amount of dislikes. All because Kayden made a commentary on him that actually makes decent points. [[FlatWhat What.]] Given that I'm barely familiar with Proto's work, [[SarcasmMode talk about a good first impression.]]

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: For me, it's when Proto told commentator Kayden Marx, who is in a financial rut and has started a [=GoFundMe=] to have fans donate money for his insurance, that [[DudeNotFunny he deserved to be in said rut.rut]]. And then he had his fans raid [=youngbloodfantasy91=]'s commentary on him and bring the video to an insane and undeserved amount of dislikes. All because Kayden made a commentary on him that actually makes decent points. [[FlatWhat What.]] Given that I'm barely familiar with Proto's work, [[SarcasmMode talk about a good first impression.]]



* DokemonStudios: Now, I enjoy ''WebAnimation/{{Sonic Shorts}}'', and there's always at least one or two shorts that would make me laugh a lot even in the weaker episodes. But the last short in Volume 3 just left a bad taste in my mouth, specifically the ending where after Froggy leaves Big the Cat, [[SuicideasComedy Big hangs himself with his own fishing rod!]] Disregarding the fact that the string or that tree branch would break, due to Big's weight, [[NightmareFuel it's actually more horrifying than the Tails doll shorts!]] Seriously, [[TheScrappy I know people don't like Big,]] and neither do I, but that ending was just unnecessary, and mean spirited, and can just be easily cut out.

to:

* DokemonStudios: Now, I enjoy ''WebAnimation/{{Sonic Shorts}}'', and there's always at least one or two shorts that would make me laugh a lot even in the weaker episodes. But the last short in Volume 3 just left a bad taste in my mouth, specifically the ending where after Froggy leaves Big the Cat, [[SuicideasComedy Big hangs himself with his own fishing rod!]] Disregarding the fact that the string or that tree branch would break, due to Big's weight, [[NightmareFuel it's actually more horrifying than the Tails doll shorts!]] Seriously, [[TheScrappy I know people don't like Big,]] and neither do I, but that ending was just unnecessary, and [[DudeNotFunny mean spirited, spirited]], and can just be easily cut out.



** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that he lost all his likability and would go down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo himself]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] That is, [[UpToEleven even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly murdered Scratchy only, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''Flaky'') [[/note]]. He [[NauseaFuel cuts a slice off Toothy's face]] ''[[TheWoobie while he was terrified and begging, in true HTF fashion, him to stop]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]]), ties some balloons on Cuddles, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, [[BodyHorror carves Nutty like an apple]], shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the unfunny Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. And of course Mondo ''had'' to put him in more episodes.

to:

** Tropers/TommyTiger: I was a former fan of HTF, but then I started to hate the show because of some certain person: Fli'''q'''py (not Flippy, he's innocent). Now, I know many people like him, so I'm pretty much one of the only Flippy haters, but I hate him because the episode ''Party Animal'' made me realize that he lost all his likability and would go down in history as one of the most heinous animated characters of all time, possibly just as bad as [[AnimeAndMange/FullmetalAlchemist Sho Tucker]] or even [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Judge Claude Frollo himself]]. So here's what happened: a bloated-up Flaky's quills popped some balloons, and [[SarcasmMode surprisingly]] he flipped-out, killing everybody except Flaky and The Mole (who, aside from being innocent, [[UngratefulBastard had also planned a party for him]]). How he murdered them is as {{Squick}}-worthy, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath graphic]], [[NightmareFuel brutal and cruel]] as his other murders [[note]] That is, [[UpToEleven even worse]] than WesternAnimation/TheItchyAndScratchyShow, because Itchy has mostly murdered Scratchy only, while Flippy has killed more than one innocent person (and sometimes even ''Flaky'') [[/note]]. He [[NauseaFuel cuts a slice off Toothy's face]] ''[[TheWoobie while he was terrified and begging, in true HTF fashion, him to stop]]'' (which [[TearJerker made me actually cry in genuine sympathy]]), ties some balloons on Cuddles, getting him sliced to bits by a fan, [[BodyHorror carves Nutty like an apple]], shoves Mime in a blender and rolls a barrel with Sniffles and knives in it. Seriously, F**K YOU, FLI''Q''PY! You're nothing more than a torturous psychopath who kills people from little to no reason at all! After some thought, I gave up on the show, because of the unfunny [[DudeNotFunny unfunny]] Flippy episodes and [[KarmaHoudini lack of comeuppance on Fli]]'''[[KarmaHoudini q]]'''[[KarmaHoudini py's part (mostly)]]. And of course Mondo ''had'' to put him in more episodes.



* [=TomPhanto=]: As much as I enjoy the plush videos of WebVideo/SuperMarioLogan, I did not like "Jeffy's Bad Word!" at all. It's about Jeffy, a mentally handicapped kid who was dumped on Mario's doorstep in "Mario The Babysitter!" and has now become one of the most recurring characters, second only to Bowser Jr. I personally dislike Jeffy episodes because most of them are just making [[OnlySaneMan Mario]] a CosmicPlaything. The episode starts off with Mario driving to Walmart and he yells at a homeless guy that gets in his way, accidentally calling him a "faggot". Jeffy then starts saying it because he likes the word. And as expected, the episode is about Mario getting into trouble because Jeffy won't stop saying "faggot". What makes this a [=DMoS=] for me is what happens at the end. Mario gives Jeffy a spanking because he wouldn't stop saying "faggot". Mario is arrested, [[WronglyAccused accused of child molestation]], and is registered as a felon and sex offender, all just for trying to discipline Jeffy. I know Mario's supposed to be a ButtMonkey in this show, but I felt the episode went way too far with the abuse.
** MetaMaster54610: You'd think Logan would have learned his lesson from the fiasco Jeffy's Bad Word caused. He knew full well how loathed that video was, so you'd think he'd know better than to create Jeffy's Bad Word 2.0 in the form of 'Locked Out'. The plot of the video is that Mario is trying to get Jeffy to eat his peas, promising him chocolate cake if he eats his peas. Rather than eating his peas, Jeffy pours them onto his high chair seat and tries to lie to Mario about it. When Mario rightfully denies him chocolate cake for not actually eating his dinner, Jeffy throws a tantrum. Admittedly, it was a dick move to have Mario eat a piece of chocolate cake in front of Jeffy, but what happens next is disproportionate retribution at its finest. Jeffy tricks Mario into going outside, then locks him out so he can steal the cake. He locks all the doors and traps Mario outside. In this video, Jeffy clearly has malicious intent, and knows EXACTLY what he's doing. Mario is locked outside in the cold, trying everything he can to get back inside. And then the Brooklyn Guy shows up, and when he shows up in a Jeffy video, you immediately know Mario is in for a bad time. The Brooklyn Officer thinks that Mario is trying to break into the house, and when he talks to Jeffy about it, the little bastard lies and says he's never seen Mario before in his life. Of course the Brooklyn Guy takes Jeffy's word over Mario's and threatens to arrest him if he ever goes near his OWN HOUSE again. Mario is rightfully PISSED at this point, mumbling threats to assault and murder Jeffy, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him for wanting revenge. He tries to get inside through the air vents, and ends up crashing down on the floor, seemingly unconscious. Jeffy sees Mario lying on the floor, and, infuriatingly, grabs him and LITERALLY THROWS HIM BACK OUTSIDE WITHOUT A WORD. Eventually, Mario BEGS Jeffy to just let him inside, which Jeffy refuses to do unless Mario gets him more chocolate cake. So Mario does get another chocolate cake...Which Mario hides in so that he can get inside. When Mario pops out of the cake, he chases Jeffy in a rage...And gets locked out AGAIN. And of COURSE it ends with him getting arrested and Jeffy getting off scott-free for his actions, because Logan REFUSES to freaking PUNISH this kid for the awful things he does. This is honestly the video that cemented my absolute LOATHING of Jeffy as a character. He's nothing more than a braindead, unfunny little sociopath that exists for the sole purpose of making Mario's life a complete and utter nightmare, and he's WELL AWARE of that fact. I am very disappointed in Logan. I thought he would have known better after the last time he made a video where Mario was unfairly tormented because of Jeffy...

to:

* [=TomPhanto=]: As much as I enjoy the plush videos of WebVideo/SuperMarioLogan, I did not like "Jeffy's Bad Word!" at all. It's about Jeffy, a mentally handicapped kid who was dumped on Mario's doorstep in "Mario The Babysitter!" and has now become one of the most recurring characters, second only to Bowser Jr. I personally dislike Jeffy episodes because most of them are just making [[OnlySaneMan Mario]] a CosmicPlaything. The episode starts off with Mario driving to Walmart and he yells at a homeless guy that gets in his way, accidentally calling him a "faggot". Jeffy then starts saying it because he likes the word. And as expected, the episode is about Mario getting into trouble because Jeffy won't stop saying "faggot". What makes this a [=DMoS=] for me is what happens at the end. Mario gives Jeffy a spanking because he wouldn't stop saying "faggot". Mario is arrested, [[WronglyAccused accused of child molestation]], and is registered as a felon and sex offender, all just for trying to discipline Jeffy. I know Mario's supposed to be a ButtMonkey in this show, but I felt the episode went [[DudeNotFunny way too far far]] with the abuse.
** MetaMaster54610: You'd think Logan would have learned his lesson from the fiasco Jeffy's Bad Word caused. He knew full well how loathed that video was, so you'd think he'd know better than to create Jeffy's Bad Word 2.0 in the form of 'Locked Out'. The plot of the video is that Mario is trying to get Jeffy to eat his peas, promising him chocolate cake if he eats his peas. Rather than eating his peas, Jeffy pours them onto his high chair seat and tries to lie to Mario about it. When Mario rightfully denies him chocolate cake for not actually eating his dinner, Jeffy throws a tantrum. Admittedly, it was a dick move to have Mario eat a piece of chocolate cake in front of Jeffy, but what happens next is disproportionate retribution at its finest. Jeffy tricks Mario into going outside, then locks him out so he can steal the cake. He locks all the doors and traps Mario outside. In this video, Jeffy clearly has malicious intent, and knows EXACTLY ''exactly'' what he's doing. Mario is locked outside in the cold, trying everything he can to get back inside. And then the Brooklyn Guy shows up, and when he shows up in a Jeffy video, you immediately know Mario is in for a bad time. The Brooklyn Officer thinks that Mario is trying to break into the house, and when he talks to Jeffy about it, the little bastard lies and says he's never seen Mario before in his life. Of course the Brooklyn Guy takes Jeffy's word over Mario's and threatens to arrest him if he ever goes near his OWN HOUSE ''own house'' again. Mario is rightfully PISSED ''pissed'' at this point, mumbling threats to assault and murder Jeffy, and honestly, after everything Jeffy's done to him, it's hard to blame him for wanting revenge. He tries to get inside through the air vents, and ends up crashing down on the floor, seemingly unconscious. Jeffy sees Mario lying on the floor, and, infuriatingly, grabs him and LITERALLY THROWS HIM BACK OUTSIDE WITHOUT A WORD. ''literally throws him back outside without a word''. Eventually, Mario BEGS ''begs'' Jeffy to just let him inside, which Jeffy refuses to do unless Mario gets him more chocolate cake. So Mario does get another chocolate cake...Which Mario hides in so that he can get inside. When Mario pops out of the cake, he chases Jeffy in a rage...And gets locked out AGAIN. ''again''. And of COURSE ''course'' it ends with him getting arrested and Jeffy getting off scott-free for his actions, because Logan REFUSES ''refuses'' to freaking PUNISH ''punish'' this kid for the awful things he does. This is honestly the video that cemented my absolute LOATHING ''loathing'' of Jeffy as a character. He's nothing more than a braindead, unfunny little sociopath that exists for the sole purpose of making Mario's life a complete and utter nightmare, and he's WELL AWARE ''well aware'' of that fact. I am very disappointed in Logan. I thought he would have known better after the last time he made a video where Mario was unfairly tormented because of Jeffy...



* Tropers/TommyTiger: There's an awful video on the internet. It revolves about {{WesternAnimation/Tom|and Jerry}} killing Jerry (this video is so messed up I'm not even providing a link!). I don't find Jerry to be mean, unlike other people, but I can understand why some people think of that. It shows Jerry getting killed by Tom with an axe, leading to [[NightmareFuel a pool of blood (no joking) covering him (Jerry)]]. In other words, Jerry gets brutally killed by [[RonTheDeathEater Tom]]. Without a trace of GoryDiscretionShot. [[ProtagonistCenteredMorality And this is treated as a good thing!]] So this video basically implies that [[JerkassWoobie the poor mouse]] deserves to die [[DisproportionateRetribution just because he defends himself from Tom with more meanness than should]]. [[EveryoneHasStandards Not even canon Tom would stoop that low!]] But apparently it's okay for the Tom in this video to slaughter Jerry like this because [[FelonyMisdemeanor he (mostly understandably) pesters him]]. [[SarcasmMode Because that's totally a reasonable and sane reaction!]] I will never forgive the blatant [[{{Hypocrite}} hypocrisy]] in that person's criticism (which was already overly scathing and gruesome to start with). This crosses both BlackComedy and AuthorTract, going more into "So funny, I forgot to laugh" territory. Even I'd draw the line at, let say, WesternAnimation/PeppaPig getting her head slammed into a coat hanger, causing her to become paralyzed, then her chest cut open and her still-beating heart being ripped out until she bleeds to death.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: There's an awful video on the internet. It revolves about {{WesternAnimation/Tom|and Jerry}} killing Jerry (this video is so messed up I'm not even providing a link!). I don't find Jerry to be mean, unlike other people, but I can understand why some people think of that. It shows Jerry getting killed by Tom with an axe, leading to [[NightmareFuel a pool of blood (no joking) covering him (Jerry)]]. In other words, Jerry gets brutally killed by [[RonTheDeathEater Tom]]. Without a trace of GoryDiscretionShot. [[ProtagonistCenteredMorality And this is treated as a good thing!]] So this video basically implies that [[JerkassWoobie the poor mouse]] deserves to die [[DisproportionateRetribution just because he defends himself from Tom with more meanness than should]]. [[EveryoneHasStandards Not even canon Tom would stoop that low!]] But apparently it's okay for the Tom in this video to slaughter Jerry like this because [[FelonyMisdemeanor he (mostly understandably) pesters him]]. [[SarcasmMode Because that's totally a reasonable and sane reaction!]] I will never forgive the blatant [[{{Hypocrite}} hypocrisy]] in that person's criticism (which was already overly scathing and gruesome to start with). This crosses both BlackComedy and AuthorTract, going more into "So funny, I forgot to laugh" DudeNotFunny territory. Even I'd draw the line at, let say, WesternAnimation/PeppaPig getting her head slammed into a coat hanger, causing her to become paralyzed, then her chest cut open and her still-beating heart being ripped out until she bleeds to death.



** Tropers/{{TommyTiger}}: I absolutely agree. Being Greek, I have read multiple NostalgiaFilter-related comments in Greek dubs of cartoons that came out in the 2000's or earlier in my country (like somebody [[{{Jerkass}} outright stating he'll never let his own children watch these so-called "abominations"]] just because he doesn't like post-2000's cartoons, or someone dropping a ClusterFBomb against said cartoons, which is just offensive) to begin with! And Adam forgot there are also well-received cartoons out nowadays (''WesternAnimation/PhineasAndFerb'', ''WesternAnimation/GravityFalls'', ''WesternAnimation/StevenUniverse'', ''WesternAnimation/WanderOverYonder'', ''WesternAnimation/RegularShow'', ''WesternAnimation/TheAmazingWorldOfGumball'', ''WesternAnimation/AdventureTime'' and ''WesternAnimation/TheLegendOfKorra'' being good examples) and cartoons that came out during his childhood were also bad for the sake of his FantasticRacism. The worst, though, is his [[SmallNameBigEgo pretentiousess]] about the whole thing.
22nd Mar '17 3:51:21 PM Sammettik
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Tropers/{{theenglishman}}: I know this will be an unpopular opinion, but to me, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMI1-DDklqE Character Assassination: Authorized]]'' represents the absolute nadir of the channel, and is still their only wrongpurae I can't endure in full. slowbeef's, well, beef with ''VideoGame/MetroidOtherM'' is not undeserved, and while his rants about the game in his LetsPlay of ''VideoGame/MetroidPrime3Corruption'' [[FranchiseOriginalSin were lengthy, passionate and vicious]], [[HandWave it could be chalked up to knee-jerk outrage because he had just finished Other M before starting his playthrough of Prime 3]]. But seeing slowbeef going on a ''very'' personal rant against DarthWiki/FallenCreator Yoshio Sakamoto for two hours ''a full year'' after having last played ''Other M'' was not so endearing, showcasing the worst traits of WebVideo/{{Retsupurae}}'s early work back when they would attack LPers directly. The few jokes that manage to work (mostly courtesy of Diabetus) have no impact because slowbeef just '''will not shut up''' about his hate-boner for Sakamoto, no matter how much the man deserves it. When we already have [[WebVideo/TwoBestFriendsPlay Mat, Pat and Woolie's]] [[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL72A90C88878A43B7 excellent (and much funnier) video series]] covering the exact same points about ''Other M'''s BadWriting and UnfortunateImplications, without once referring to Sakamoto as a functional illiterate, this video has no reason to exist.

to:

** Tropers/{{theenglishman}}: I know this will be an unpopular opinion, but to me, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMI1-DDklqE Character Assassination: Authorized]]'' represents the absolute nadir of the channel, and is still their only wrongpurae I can't endure in full. slowbeef's, well, beef with ''VideoGame/MetroidOtherM'' is not undeserved, and while his rants about the game in his LetsPlay of ''VideoGame/MetroidPrime3Corruption'' [[FranchiseOriginalSin were lengthy, passionate and vicious]], [[HandWave it could be chalked up to knee-jerk outrage because he had just finished Other M before starting his playthrough of Prime 3]]. But seeing slowbeef going on a ''very'' personal rant against DarthWiki/FallenCreator Yoshio Sakamoto for two hours ''a full year'' after having last played ''Other M'' was not so endearing, showcasing the worst traits of WebVideo/{{Retsupurae}}'s early work back when they would attack LPers directly. The few jokes that manage to work (mostly courtesy of Diabetus) have no impact because slowbeef just '''will will not shut up''' up about his hate-boner for Sakamoto, no matter how much the man deserves it. When we already have [[WebVideo/TwoBestFriendsPlay Mat, Pat and Woolie's]] [[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL72A90C88878A43B7 excellent (and much funnier) video series]] covering the exact same points about ''Other M'''s BadWriting and UnfortunateImplications, without once referring to Sakamoto as a functional illiterate, this video has no reason to exist.



* Tropers/{{Catmuto}}: With Faulerro's ''[[WebVideo/DanganRonpaAbridgedThing DRAT]]'', I overall enjoyed the few episodes he brought out to date. They made fun of the game and even pointed out things that always bothered me, and also gave the characters alterations or emphasis on their personalities. My [=DMoS=], though, is in Episode 4 when the subject of [[spoiler: Fujisaki Chihiro's gender]] is brought up. Monokuma holds up a sign that says that it will not be further discussed, as Tumblr would get angry at the creator. This could count as a [=DMoS=] to every person on Tumblr who would actually begin to rage at the topic mentioned in the spoiler, but the fact that Faulerro's videos have repeatedly put emphasis on this, bugs me. It never was much of a question to begin with (those who claim otherwise would mostly fall under the MisaimedFandom side) and his emphasizing like he cares a lot what Tumblr people say comes across as him trying way too hard to be 'politically correct' on this subject matter, including the insistence on referring to the character as 'they' instead of gender-pronouns post-revelation.

to:

* Tropers/{{Catmuto}}: With Faulerro's ''[[WebVideo/DanganRonpaAbridgedThing DRAT]]'', I overall enjoyed the few episodes he brought out to date. They made fun of the game and even pointed out things that always bothered me, and also gave the characters alterations or emphasis on their personalities. My [=DMoS=], though, is in Episode 4 when the subject of [[spoiler: Fujisaki Chihiro's gender]] is brought up. Monokuma holds up a sign that says that it will not be further discussed, as Tumblr would get angry at the creator. This could count as a [=DMoS=] to every person on Tumblr who would actually begin to rage at the topic mentioned in the spoiler, but the fact that Faulerro's videos have repeatedly put emphasis on this, bugs me. It never was much of a question to begin with (those who claim otherwise would mostly fall under the MisaimedFandom side) and his emphasizing like he cares a lot what Tumblr people say comes across as him trying way too hard to be 'politically correct' "politically correct" on this subject matter, including the insistence on referring to the character as 'they' instead of gender-pronouns post-revelation.



* Tropers/{{taylorkerekes}}: I enjoy watching WebVideo/TheCartoonHero, as lot of his videos are rather interesting and informative, but his absolute worst moment in my book deals with his Top 20 Most Hated Characters video, particularparticularly Lucy Van Pelt's entry. Now while I can be perfectly understand this character being on anybody's list of characters they despise, even though she is one of my favorite {{Peanuts}} characters, the Hero really goes over the line when he gets to at least two comeuppances that Lucy has received over the years, from Charlie Brown turning invisible on her so he can kick the football (which to me is up for a moral debate) to [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy Peter Griffin]] beating her up, the latter of which the Hero declares in a rather devious-sounding tone: "That is so satisfying!" Hold on a goddamn second--You actually enjoyed that? You actually think that even [[WouldHurtAChild children should receive such harsh punishments from grown adults?!!]] I don't care if it's just a cartoon! Seeing Lucy getting beat up by a grown man, no matter how bitchy others say she is, is just as bad as seeing [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wl9y3SIPt7o Judge William Adams mercilessly beat his daughter with a belt]]!

to:

* Tropers/{{taylorkerekes}}: I enjoy watching WebVideo/TheCartoonHero, ''WebVideo/TheCartoonHero'', as lot of his videos are rather interesting and informative, but his absolute worst moment in my book deals with his Top 20 Most Hated Characters video, particularparticularly particularly Lucy Van Pelt's entry. Now while I can be perfectly understand this character being on anybody's list of characters they despise, even though she is one of my favorite {{Peanuts}} characters, the Hero really goes over the line when he gets to at least two comeuppances that Lucy has received over the years, from Charlie Brown turning invisible on her so he can kick the football (which to me is up for a moral debate) to [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy Peter Griffin]] beating her up, the latter of which the Hero declares in a rather devious-sounding tone: "That is so satisfying!" Hold on a goddamn second--You actually enjoyed that? You actually think that even [[WouldHurtAChild children should receive such harsh punishments from grown adults?!!]] I don't care if it's just a cartoon! Seeing Lucy getting beat up by a grown man, no matter how bitchy others say she is, is just as bad as seeing [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wl9y3SIPt7o Judge William Adams mercilessly beat his daughter with a belt]]!



** Troper/{{Knightofbalance}}: [[http://antcow.deviantart.com/art/Tifa-chronicles-chap-3-part-1-Punch-war-577598210 This]] and it's two sequels. It's sadistic, cruel, demonizes one character and defiles the other. The only thing it has going for it is that it's well made but that's because it's a comission, meaning the author paid someone to do this. '''(Sigh)'''.

to:

** Troper/{{Knightofbalance}}: [[http://antcow.deviantart.com/art/Tifa-chronicles-chap-3-part-1-Punch-war-577598210 This]] and it's two sequels. It's sadistic, cruel, demonizes one character and defiles the other. The only thing it has going for it is that it's well made but that's because it's a comission, meaning the author paid someone to do this. '''(Sigh)'''.
22nd Mar '17 3:46:45 PM Sammettik
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/{{Gotgunpowder}}: The time he got incredibly offended over the HandOfFate Dealer making a fat joke (Referring to a ring that does something to your food and gold: "Fat and poor, an unusual combination"). I'd normally understand it (to a degree) but it was apparently so irredeemable that he outright banned people disagreeing with him, including long time, dedicated fans, ''and even boasted about this in the comments''. Way to completely alienate your fanbase, Crab.

to:

* Tropers/{{Gotgunpowder}}: The time he got incredibly offended over the HandOfFate Dealer making a fat joke (Referring to a ring that does something to your food and gold: "Fat and poor, an unusual combination"). I'd normally understand it (to a degree) but it was apparently so irredeemable that he outright banned people disagreeing with him, including long time, dedicated fans, ''and and even boasted about this in the comments''.comments. Way to completely alienate your fanbase, Crab.



* Butter: The ''"5 WORST fanbases"'' video. Due to the fact that there are so many terrible fanbases to choose from and so many things that need to be said, the video was basically guaranteed to be awesome, especially since IHE has a history of well-done rants on fans. And what does he do with this amazing concept, that was basically guarenteed to be awesome? He runs it in the ground. [softreturn] First, he makes up three rules to judge how bad these fanbases are. Isn't the whole point of IHE that all his videos are based on his opinions and are not ment to be taken as objectively true or false statements, him trying to back up his placement is going against that and renders his defence of everything just being his opinion null and void, especially since rule #1 and #3 themselves boil down to "it's muh 'pinion". The second rule isn't really legit either. It defines two criterias, how much results you find for the fanbase at r34 and how quickly you cringe when you look at fanart on deviantart. Both criteria are arbitrary; how much results you find at r34 is directly proportional to the franchises popularity (IHE even points that out in the very first entry) and thus irrelevant to the fanbases quality (For example, by that logic RealLife has the worst fanbase somehow), and 'how quickly you cringe' is an extremely trite statement that doesn't really have any meaning. [softreturn] His first entry are gamers, which is incredibly redundant because both VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog and VideoGame/FiveNightsAtFreddys are video games and are also on the list. His reasons are also very hypocritical; he rants about how gamers will go out of their way to rant about things they know they won't like, just to belittle it, because that's the very thing his own channel is about. He also claims that they are 'entitled', which is a meaningless statement since this is one of those words that don't mean anything without context, context he never gives. [softreturn] Number four is anime, and the very first thing he says about it is that he doesn't know anything about it. Great. He doesn't even bring up a point against the anime fandom. He just cracks a contextless joke about some guy called James and how James ruined his live. That's it. He also doesn't bring up his second rule again, he doesn't even lampshade it this time, he just drops it. [softreturn] Number three is Sonic. Like the anime segment, it feels really rushed, but this time, instead of abandoning rule 2, the entire segment just consists of it. The segment goes like this: Here's the number of images Sonic has on r34, here the number on deviant art. These pictures are cringeworthy *shows pictures that are obvious jokes like a Shadow x Shrek pairing and a picture of a toilet looking like Sonic* [softreturn] Number two are bronies. This is probably the least bad entry on his list, but that doesn't mean it's not flawed. His first complaint is that bronies are 'obsessed', which is another context- and meaningless statement. Another complaint is that there are costumes for it. So all popular media in existance, including Real Life suck, because there are costumes of their characters? He also uses rule 2 again, but it goes against his placement of this fandom. MLP has less results than Sonic. If the only somewhat objective rule states that the Sonic fandom is worse than the MLP one, why is MLP higher on the list? [softreturn] Number one is [=FNaF=]. The first point of his is that people should shut up about it and there are too many videos one YouTube about it. IHE made multiple vidoes about it, talk about hypocricy. His next point is that people are playing it's creepyness down and thus going against the point of it bring a horror game. This is a phenomenon that is present in every media of the horror genre ever. It's a huge double standard to act like the flaws of an entire genre are caused by one fandom; why is it something unusual that most of [=FNaF=]-fan-media are not scary on their own, when the exact same thing is the case for things like Silent Hill, etc., you name it.

to:

* Butter: The ''"5 WORST fanbases"'' video. Due to the fact that there are so many terrible fanbases to choose from and so many things that need to be said, the video was basically guaranteed to be awesome, especially since IHE has a history of well-done rants on fans. And what does he do with this amazing concept, that was basically guarenteed guaranteed to be awesome? He runs it in the ground. [softreturn] First, he makes up three rules to judge how bad these fanbases are. Isn't the whole point of IHE that all his videos are based on his opinions and are not ment to be taken as objectively true or false statements, him trying to back up his placement is going against that and renders his defence of everything just being his opinion null and void, especially since rule #1 and #3 themselves boil down to "it's muh 'pinion". The second rule isn't really legit either. It defines two criterias, how much results you find for the fanbase at r34 and how quickly you cringe when you look at fanart on deviantart. Both criteria are arbitrary; how much results you find at r34 is directly proportional to the franchises popularity (IHE even points that out in the very first entry) and thus irrelevant to the fanbases quality (For example, by that logic RealLife has the worst fanbase somehow), and 'how quickly you cringe' is an extremely trite statement that doesn't really have any meaning. [softreturn] His first entry are gamers, which is incredibly redundant because both VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog and VideoGame/FiveNightsAtFreddys are video games and are also on the list. His reasons are also very hypocritical; he rants about how gamers will go out of their way to rant about things they know they won't like, just to belittle it, because that's the very thing his own channel is about. He also claims that they are 'entitled', which is a meaningless statement since this is one of those words that don't mean anything without context, context he never gives. [softreturn] Number four is anime, and the very first thing he says about it is that he doesn't know anything about it. Great. He doesn't even bring up a point against the anime fandom. He just cracks a contextless joke about some guy called James and how James ruined his live. That's it. He also doesn't bring up his second rule again, he doesn't even lampshade it this time, he just drops it. [softreturn] Number three is Sonic. Like the anime segment, it feels really rushed, but this time, instead of abandoning rule 2, the entire segment just consists of it. The segment goes like this: Here's the number of images Sonic has on r34, here the number on deviant art. These pictures are cringeworthy *shows pictures that are obvious jokes like a Shadow x Shrek pairing and a picture of a toilet looking like Sonic* [softreturn] Number two are bronies. This is probably the least bad entry on his list, but that doesn't mean it's not flawed. His first complaint is that bronies are 'obsessed', which is another context- and meaningless statement. Another complaint is that there are costumes for it. So all popular media in existance, including Real Life suck, because there are costumes of their characters? He also uses rule 2 again, but it goes against his placement of this fandom. MLP has less results than Sonic. If the only somewhat objective rule states that the Sonic fandom is worse than the MLP one, why is MLP higher on the list? [softreturn] Number one is [=FNaF=]. The first point of his is that people should shut up about it and there are too many videos one YouTube about it. IHE made multiple vidoes about it, talk about hypocricy.hypocrisy. His next point is that people are playing it's creepyness down and thus going against the point of it bring a horror game. This is a phenomenon that is present in every media of the horror genre ever. It's a huge double standard to act like the flaws of an entire genre are caused by one fandom; why is it something unusual that most of [=FNaF=]-fan-media are not scary on their own, when the exact same thing is the case for things like Silent Hill, etc., you name it.
22nd Mar '17 5:29:36 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/TommyTiger: There's an awful video on the internet. It revolves about {{WesternAnimation/Tom|and Jerry}} killing Jerry (this video is so messed up I'm not even providing a link!). I don't find Jerry to be mean, unlike other people, but I can understand why some people think of that. It shows Jerry getting killed by Tom with an axe, leading to [[NightmareFuel a pool of blood (no joking) covering him (Jerry)]]. In other words, Jerry gets brutally killed by [[RonTheDeathEater Tom]]. Without a trace of GoryDiscretionShot. [[ProtagonistCenteredMorality And this is treated as a good thing!]] So this video basically implies that [[JerkassWoobie the poor mouse]] deserves to die [[DisproportionateRetribution just because he defends himself from Tom with more meanness than should]]. [[EveryoneHasStandards Not even canon Tom would stoop that low!]] But apparently it's okay for the Tom in this video to slaughter Jerry like this because [[FelonyMisdemeanor he (mostly understandably) pesters him]]. [[SarcasmMode Because that's totally a reasonable and sane reaction!]] I will never forgive the blatant [[{{Hypocrite}} hypocrisy]] in that person's criticism (which was already overly scathing and gruesome to start with). This crosses both BlackComedy and AuthorTract, going more into "So funny, I forgot to laugh" territory. Even I'd find the death of my personal {{Scrapp|y}}ies scary and totally not funny at all.

to:

* Tropers/TommyTiger: There's an awful video on the internet. It revolves about {{WesternAnimation/Tom|and Jerry}} killing Jerry (this video is so messed up I'm not even providing a link!). I don't find Jerry to be mean, unlike other people, but I can understand why some people think of that. It shows Jerry getting killed by Tom with an axe, leading to [[NightmareFuel a pool of blood (no joking) covering him (Jerry)]]. In other words, Jerry gets brutally killed by [[RonTheDeathEater Tom]]. Without a trace of GoryDiscretionShot. [[ProtagonistCenteredMorality And this is treated as a good thing!]] So this video basically implies that [[JerkassWoobie the poor mouse]] deserves to die [[DisproportionateRetribution just because he defends himself from Tom with more meanness than should]]. [[EveryoneHasStandards Not even canon Tom would stoop that low!]] But apparently it's okay for the Tom in this video to slaughter Jerry like this because [[FelonyMisdemeanor he (mostly understandably) pesters him]]. [[SarcasmMode Because that's totally a reasonable and sane reaction!]] I will never forgive the blatant [[{{Hypocrite}} hypocrisy]] in that person's criticism (which was already overly scathing and gruesome to start with). This crosses both BlackComedy and AuthorTract, going more into "So funny, I forgot to laugh" territory. Even I'd find draw the death of my personal {{Scrapp|y}}ies scary line at, let say, WesternAnimation/PeppaPig getting her head slammed into a coat hanger, causing her to become paralyzed, then her chest cut open and totally not funny at all.her still-beating heart being ripped out until she bleeds to death.
20th Mar '17 6:25:24 PM Bengson26
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/Rossmallo : IHateEverything 's "5 EPIC Ways To Be a YouTube Celebrity! ✔". It's bad enough that at a fair few times it's coming off as whining about the copyright issues he's going through. It's bad enough that he is so utterly openly hostile and confrontational to everything involved. It's bad enough that it's all said in such over the top smugness that it destroys his usual level headed tone. But no, what makes all of this utterly infuriating is "I hold nothing personally against any of the people mentioned, I guess". ....Yeah, no. He shows multiple examples of certain youtubers in the background, calls some out by name, and even insults one of the previously mentioned people in the outtro, after he's said this. While yes, some of the criticisms are valid, this whole bit at the end just makes it come off as "Fuck you, but not
really." Either stand your ground and embrace the backlash or don't say it at all.

to:

* Tropers/Rossmallo : IHateEverything 's "5 EPIC Ways To Be a YouTube Celebrity! ✔". It's bad enough that at a fair few times it's coming off as whining about the copyright issues he's going through. It's bad enough that he is so utterly openly hostile and confrontational to everything involved. It's bad enough that it's all said in such over the top smugness that it destroys his usual level headed tone. But no, what makes all of this utterly infuriating is "I hold nothing personally against any of the people mentioned, I guess". ....Yeah, no. He shows multiple examples of certain youtubers in the background, calls some out by name, and even insults one of the previously mentioned people in the outtro, after he's said this. While yes, some of the criticisms are valid, this whole bit at the end just makes it come off as "Fuck you, but not
not really." Either stand your ground and embrace the backlash or don't say it at all.
19th Mar '17 5:56:32 PM TheNerfGuy
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** GreenFablesInverness: And come season four this show has not gotten any better in its treatment of its characters. While it’s meant to be a throwaway joke, Ruby laughing at Juane’s bunny hoodie is frankly insulting to my intelligence because it is a regression of character development the past few seasons have worked so hard to deconstruct the traditional but toxic stereotyping. One, Juane’s masculinity, or rather lack thereof, is the butt monkey yet again when a key part of his S1 character arc was getting away from poisonous macho man mindset. It’s what almost got him killed against Grimm biting off more than he could chew. And who help him confront his weakness and move on towards self-improvement? Oh yeah, Pyrrha, the girl he cared for and lost and we see a moment later used his memento of her being integrated into his weapon’s shield so a piece of her spirit will remain fighting alongside Team JNRP. The girl who accepted Juane for who he was and was everything she wanted in life; somebody that didn’t put her on a pedestal instead treating her like a real person. As if laughing at Juane wasn’t bad enough, Ruby laughing at the cereal icon is even worse because it’s a brown bunny and who else is a brown bunny? Fan favorite Velvet Scarlatina! The girl who had to fight tooth and nail to prove despite her cute looks she was as lethal as any other huntress. Her weapon is a fusion of every kickass weapon we’ve seen Beacon’s students use. She copies their fighting style into her own combat tactics to take on a horde of Grimm like the badass she is. That her weapon was Monty’s favorite. Remember the faunus girl who got picked on in season 1 by Cardin and his team for her bunny ears to demonstrate what kind of jerks they were and the discrimination faunus face? Yeah, the same group of bullies that would go on to antagonize and blackmail Juane! Yeah, they can make the excuse the deaths of Pyrrha and Penny were “planned from the start to demonstrate no one in safe in the world of Remnant” until they’re blue but this is just mounting evidence that RT doesn’t make an effort to respect their characters, the audience’s intelligence, or even their own writing integrity.
17th Mar '17 11:37:36 AM ldelavina3
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* ldelavina3: It's no secret that every web animation series has its rough times, small or big. ''WebAnimation/{{Sonic Shorts}}'' is no exception, which brings us to their [=DMoS=] to me. The "How To Create Your Own Sonic Fan Character" bit from Volume 6. It pretty much implies that everyone who has made a fan character as lazy, unoriginal people. I know that there are a lot of poorly-made fan characters, but this just feels like a [[TakeThat giant middle finger]] to fan character creators and an unfunny one at that.
** DokemonStudios: Now, I enjoy ''WebAnimation/{{Sonic Shorts}}'', and there's always at least one or two shorts that would make me laugh a lot even in the weaker episodes. But the last short in Volume 3 just left a bad taste in my mouth, specifically the ending where after Froggy leaves Big the Cat, [[SuicideasComedy Big hangs himself with his own fishing rod!]] Disregarding the fact that the string or that tree branch would break, due to Big's weight, [[NightmareFuel it's actually more horrifying than the Tails doll shorts!]] Seriously, [[TheScrappy I know people don't like Big,]] and neither do I, but that ending was just unnecessary, and mean spirited, and can just be easily cut out.

to:

* ldelavina3: It's no secret that every web animation series has its rough times, small or big. ''WebAnimation/{{Sonic Shorts}}'' is no exception, which brings us to their [=DMoS=] to me. The "How To Create Your Own Sonic Fan Character" bit from Volume 6. It pretty much implies that everyone who has made a fan character as lazy, unoriginal people. I know that there are a lot of poorly-made fan characters, but this just feels like a [[TakeThat giant middle finger]] to fan character creators and an unfunny one at that.
**
DokemonStudios: Now, I enjoy ''WebAnimation/{{Sonic Shorts}}'', and there's always at least one or two shorts that would make me laugh a lot even in the weaker episodes. But the last short in Volume 3 just left a bad taste in my mouth, specifically the ending where after Froggy leaves Big the Cat, [[SuicideasComedy Big hangs himself with his own fishing rod!]] Disregarding the fact that the string or that tree branch would break, due to Big's weight, [[NightmareFuel it's actually more horrifying than the Tails doll shorts!]] Seriously, [[TheScrappy I know people don't like Big,]] and neither do I, but that ending was just unnecessary, and mean spirited, and can just be easily cut out.
16th Mar '17 1:06:55 AM ImSpidey2
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/ImSpidey2: I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}} trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[{{Squick}} As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".

to:

* Tropers/ImSpidey2: I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}} trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus in Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[{{Squick}} As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".
15th Mar '17 10:00:33 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a small bone to pick with a throwaway line in the WebOriginal/CollegeHumor video, "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNlAZLCGLuU Luigi Finally Snaps]]". The plot of the video involves Luigi [[WhatTheHellHero calling out Mario for basically getting the spotlight while the green plumber always plays second fiddle]]. The video was perfectly fine for the most part, but what [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy really grinds my gears]] is this: Mario mentions he at least had VideoGame/LuigisMansion which Luigi says was terrible. Okay, fine; no problem. I like the game, but I can see why others don't. Then Mario says "Luigi, it's-a [[UsefulNotes/NintendoGameCube GameCube]]; all of those games were terrible". [[BigWhat What!?]] And the [=GameCube=] hate apparently doesn't stop with this video; I recall them often repeatedly bashing the system in several videos. Okay, first of all: all [=GameCube=] games are terrible? I don't know about you, but I had fond memories of playing my [=GameCube=], and several others did as well. I remember playing the heck out of VideoGame/SuperMarioSunshine, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaTheWindWaker, [[VideoGame/SonicAdventure2 Sonic Adventure 2 Battle]], and VideoGame/PaperMarioTheThousandYearDoor. And that's not even going into [[VideoGame/MetroidPrime several other]] [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil6 games that I]] [[VideoGame/StarFoxAssault missed out on]]. In fact, a lot of these "terrible" games have become fan favorites in recent years; heck ''Wind Waker'' got an HD re-release on the UsefulNotes/WiiU. Really, it's like these guys only think that [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks even for the most arbitrary change, the game automatically sucks]]. Second, putting all [=GameCube=] games in the same category of awful is a stupid generalization. I never had any interest in the UsefulNotes/Xbox360; does that mean all Xbox 360 games are terrible because of that? No; it just means I never took an interest in it! Not every [=GameCube=] game is ''Aquaman: Battle For Atlantis'', and not every Xbox 360 game is VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog2006. I may have merely mentioned this moment because I grew up with a [=GameCube=], but even if I wasn't a [=GameCube=] owner I would be headdesking so hard at this moment.

to:

* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a small bone to pick with a throwaway line in the WebOriginal/CollegeHumor video, "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNlAZLCGLuU Luigi Finally Snaps]]". The plot of the video involves Luigi [[WhatTheHellHero calling out Mario for basically getting the spotlight while the green plumber always plays second fiddle]]. The video was perfectly fine for the most part, but what [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy really grinds my gears]] is this: Mario mentions he at least had VideoGame/LuigisMansion which Luigi says was terrible. Okay, fine; no problem. I like the game, but I can see why others don't. Then Mario says "Luigi, it's-a [[UsefulNotes/NintendoGameCube GameCube]]; all of those games were terrible". [[BigWhat What!?]] And the [=GameCube=] hate apparently doesn't stop with this video; I recall them often repeatedly bashing the system in several videos. Okay, first of all: all [=GameCube=] games are terrible? I don't know about you, but I had fond memories of playing my [=GameCube=], and several others did as well. I remember playing the heck out of VideoGame/SuperMarioSunshine, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaTheWindWaker, [[VideoGame/SonicAdventure2 Sonic Adventure 2 Battle]], and VideoGame/PaperMarioTheThousandYearDoor. And that's not even going into [[VideoGame/MetroidPrime several other]] [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil6 [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil4 games that I]] [[VideoGame/StarFoxAssault missed out on]]. In fact, a lot of these "terrible" games have become fan favorites in recent years; heck ''Wind Waker'' got an HD re-release on the UsefulNotes/WiiU. Really, it's like these guys only think that [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks even for the most arbitrary change, the game automatically sucks]]. Second, putting all [=GameCube=] games in the same category of awful is a stupid generalization. I never had any interest in the UsefulNotes/Xbox360; does that mean all Xbox 360 games are terrible because of that? No; it just means I never took an interest in it! Not every [=GameCube=] game is ''Aquaman: Battle For Atlantis'', and not every Xbox 360 game is VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog2006. I may have merely mentioned this moment because I grew up with a [=GameCube=], but even if I wasn't a [=GameCube=] owner I would be headdesking so hard at this moment.
15th Mar '17 9:49:47 PM WhoNeedsAMango
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** GreenFablesInverness: And come season four this show has not gotten any better in its treatment of its characters. While it’s meant to be a throwaway joke, Ruby laughing at Juane’s bunny hoodie is frankly insulting to my intelligence because it is a regression of character development the past few seasons have worked so hard to deconstruct the traditional but toxic stereotyping. One, Juane’s masculinity, or rather lack thereof, is the butt monkey yet again when a key part of his S1 character arc was getting away from poisonous macho man mindset. It’s what almost got him killed against Grimm biting off more than he could chew. And who help him confront his weakness and move on towards self-improvement? Oh yeah, Pyrrha, the girl he cared for and lost and we see a moment later used his memento of her being integrated into his weapon’s shield so a piece of her spirit will remain fighting alongside Team JNRP. The girl who accepted Juane for who he was and was everything she wanted in life; somebody that didn’t put her on a pedestal instead treating her like a real person. As if laughing at Juane wasn’t bad enough, Ruby laughing at the cereal icon is even worse because it’s a brown bunny and who else is a brown bunny? Fan favorite Velvet Scarlatina! The girl who had to fight tooth and nail to prove despite her cute looks she was as lethal as any other huntress. Her weapon is a fusion of every kickass weapon we’ve seen Beacon’s students use. She copies their fighting style into her own combat tactics to take on a horde of Grimm like the badass she is. That her weapon was Monty’s favorite. Remember the faunus girl who got picked on in season 1 by Cardin and his team for her bunny ears to demonstrate what kind of jerks they were and the discrimination faunus face? Yeah, the same group of bullies that would go on to antagonize and blackmail Juane! Yeah, they can make the excuse the deaths of Pyrrha and Penny were “planned from the start to demonstrate no one in safe in the world of Remnant” until they’re blue but this is just mounting evidence that RT doesn’t make an effort to respect their characters, the audience’s intelligence, or even their own writing integrity.
15th Mar '17 11:06:54 AM ImSpidey2
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/ImSpidey2: I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}} trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[Squick As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".

to:

* Tropers/ImSpidey2: I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}} trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[Squick [[{{Squick}} As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".
15th Mar '17 11:06:18 AM ImSpidey2
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}} trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[Squick As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".

to:

* Tropers/ImSpidey2: I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}} trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[Squick As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".
15th Mar '17 11:02:08 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing [[WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}}]] trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[Squick As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".

to:

* I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing [[WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}}]] WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}} trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[Squick As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".
15th Mar '17 10:58:53 AM TommyTiger
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing [[WebVideo/Pyrocynical]] trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[Squick As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".

to:

* I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing [[WebVideo/Pyrocynical]] [[WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}}]] trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[Squick As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".
15th Mar '17 12:30:49 AM eneuman96
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* eneuman96 Since I can't just call [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-Wn48geCJ8 Racist Mario]] a Dethroning Animated Short of Suck and call it a day, I'll try to break down the points as to why it's utterly terrible. Let's see...the unfunny shoehorned reference to [[Film/ThePhantomMenace The Phantom Menace]] and the shoehorned {{Franchise/Pokemon}} rape joke...thing that both [[BigLippedAlligatorMoment come right the fuck out of nowhere]]. The unfunny random disgusting violence that has no point at all (it doesn't even manage to be [[BloodyHilarious Bloody Hilarious]] either; it's just more gross and a bad attempt to shock than anything). The [[RuleOfThree unfunny]] lack of any real jokes. It certainly doesn't help that [[SeinfeldIsUnfunny making a violent Mario spoof in this day and age is like beating a dead horse]]. Oh, and the fact that it blatantly displays censored nudity in its thumbnail as a cheap clickbait tactic, [[SexSells which is almost certainly the reason it got so many views.]] One last thing: [[NonIndicativeName how is Mario racist anyway]]? Given that he tries to kill literally everyone on the track and not just the non-Nintendo characters, ''Genocidal Mario'' would be a far more fitting title. Hell, the title sounds like it could have been about Mario becoming bitter and prejudiced towards non-Nintendo characters over the years for stealing his thunder instead of just a batshit insane psychopath in a kart, [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot which would have made a far better short than this abomination]]. (EDIT: Looking back at this, I [[LateToThePunchline just realized]] that the "Racist" in the title is probably a pun on the fact that the characters are initially racing each other. Still doesn't change my opinion on everything else, though)
** SenorCornholio: I have recently warmed up to Racist Mario due to the voice clips being used in some of [[Machinima/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers SMG4's videos]] (such as [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjb0FgQqpZA this one]]), but that doesn't change the fact that overall, this video is heavily flawed in more ways than one. I could go on about the unfunny jokes, the nonsensical plot, etc, but what I think makes the whole thing fall apart: the premise. Mario goes insane and starts killing everyone because of all the third-party characters in the current race. Why does this not work? Well firstly, because there has never been a third-party character in a main Mario Kart title. The DLC characters for Mario Kart 8 were all from other Nintendo franchises, and therefore first-party. Secondly, the characters themselves; [[VideoGame/SegaSuperstars Sonic may have been playable in several Sega-themed sports and racing titles]], but the only time he crossed over with Nintendo itself was in VideoGame/SuperSmashBros, which would have actually been a better setting due to [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog their]] [[VideoGame/MetalGear own]] [[Franchise/MegaMan selection]] [[VideoGame/PacMan of]] [[Franchise/StreetFighter third]]-[[VideoGame/FinalFantasyVII party]] [[{{VideoGame/Bayonetta}} characters]]. And even then, Knuckles wasn't even playable so that's out. It's like some of these franchises were listed all because of their racing titles, with [[Franchise/StarWars Anakin]] and [[VideoGame/CrashBandicoot Crash's head]] also being standout examples. Thirdly, speaking of Sony, was there an alternate universe I'm not aware of where Sony and Nintendo crossed over and [[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet Sackboy]] and [[VideoGame/GodOfWar Kratos]] were put into karts? I'll admit that Kratos driving a tiny kart is a funny sight, but what's the point? Ironically, there's one crossover that I doubt Flashgitz even knows he got right, and that's Pac-Man's head on a spear, since he was playable in the Arcade GP games developed by Namco-Bandai. Other than that, the rest of the references are shallow at best and make absolutely no sense at worst. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go watch [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKRJt4CDMY the version where all the violence is replaced with The Nutshack]]. It's somehow way better.

to:

* eneuman96 Since I can't just call [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-Wn48geCJ8 Racist Mario]] a Dethroning Animated Short of Suck and call it a day, I'll try to break down the points as to why it's utterly terrible. Let's see...the unfunny shoehorned reference to [[Film/ThePhantomMenace The Phantom Menace]] and the shoehorned {{Franchise/Pokemon}} rape joke...thing that both [[BigLippedAlligatorMoment come right the fuck out of nowhere]]. The unfunny random disgusting violence that has no point at all (it doesn't even manage to be [[BloodyHilarious Bloody Hilarious]] either; it's just more gross and a bad attempt to shock than anything). The [[RuleOfThree unfunny]] lack of any real jokes. It certainly doesn't help that [[SeinfeldIsUnfunny making a violent Mario spoof in this day and age is like beating a dead horse]]. Oh, and the fact that it blatantly displays censored nudity in its thumbnail as a cheap clickbait tactic, [[SexSells which is almost certainly the reason it got so many views.]] One last thing: [[NonIndicativeName how is Mario racist anyway]]? Given that he tries to kill literally everyone on the track and not just the non-Nintendo characters, ''Genocidal Mario'' would be a far more fitting title. Hell, the title sounds like it could have been about Mario becoming bitter and prejudiced towards non-Nintendo characters over the years for stealing his thunder instead of just a batshit insane psychopath in a kart, [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot which would have made a far better short than this abomination]]. (EDIT: Looking back at this, I [[LateToThePunchline just realized]] that the "Racist" in the title is probably a pun on the fact that the characters are initially racing each other. Still doesn't change my opinion on everything else, though)
**
SenorCornholio: I have recently warmed up to Racist Mario due to the voice clips being used in some of [[Machinima/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers SMG4's videos]] (such as [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjb0FgQqpZA this one]]), but that doesn't change the fact that overall, this video is heavily flawed in more ways than one. I could go on about the unfunny jokes, the nonsensical plot, etc, but what I think makes the whole thing fall apart: the premise. Mario goes insane and starts killing everyone because of all the third-party characters in the current race. Why does this not work? Well firstly, because there has never been a third-party character in a main Mario Kart title. The DLC characters for Mario Kart 8 were all from other Nintendo franchises, and therefore first-party. Secondly, the characters themselves; [[VideoGame/SegaSuperstars Sonic may have been playable in several Sega-themed sports and racing titles]], but the only time he crossed over with Nintendo itself was in VideoGame/SuperSmashBros, which would have actually been a better setting due to [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog their]] [[VideoGame/MetalGear own]] [[Franchise/MegaMan selection]] [[VideoGame/PacMan of]] [[Franchise/StreetFighter third]]-[[VideoGame/FinalFantasyVII party]] [[{{VideoGame/Bayonetta}} characters]]. And even then, Knuckles wasn't even playable so that's out. It's like some of these franchises were listed all because of their racing titles, with [[Franchise/StarWars Anakin]] and [[VideoGame/CrashBandicoot Crash's head]] also being standout examples. Thirdly, speaking of Sony, was there an alternate universe I'm not aware of where Sony and Nintendo crossed over and [[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet Sackboy]] and [[VideoGame/GodOfWar Kratos]] were put into karts? I'll admit that Kratos driving a tiny kart is a funny sight, but what's the point? Ironically, there's one crossover that I doubt Flashgitz even knows he got right, and that's Pac-Man's head on a spear, since he was playable in the Arcade GP games developed by Namco-Bandai. Other than that, the rest of the references are shallow at best and make absolutely no sense at worst. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go watch [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKRJt4CDMY the version where all the violence is replaced with The Nutshack]]. It's somehow way better.



* Tropers/Rossmallo : IHateEverything 's "5 EPIC Ways To Be a YouTube Celebrity! ✔". It's bad enough that at a fair few times it's coming off as whining about the copyright issues he's going through. It's bad enough that he is so utterly openly hostile and confrontational to everything involved. It's bad enough that it's all said in such over the top smugness that it destroys his usual level headed tone. But no, what makes all of this utterly infuriating is "I hold nothing personally against any of the people mentioned, I guess". ....Yeah, no. He shows multiple examples of certain youtubers in the background, calls some out by name, and even insults one of the previously mentioned people in the outtro, after he's said this. While yes, some of the criticisms are valid, this whole bit at the end just makes it come off as "Fuck you, but not really." Either stand your ground and embrace the backlash or don't say it at all.

to:

* Tropers/Rossmallo : IHateEverything 's "5 EPIC Ways To Be a YouTube Celebrity! ✔". It's bad enough that at a fair few times it's coming off as whining about the copyright issues he's going through. It's bad enough that he is so utterly openly hostile and confrontational to everything involved. It's bad enough that it's all said in such over the top smugness that it destroys his usual level headed tone. But no, what makes all of this utterly infuriating is "I hold nothing personally against any of the people mentioned, I guess". ....Yeah, no. He shows multiple examples of certain youtubers in the background, calls some out by name, and even insults one of the previously mentioned people in the outtro, after he's said this. While yes, some of the criticisms are valid, this whole bit at the end just makes it come off as "Fuck you, but not not
really." Either stand your ground and embrace the backlash or don't say it at all.



* eneuman96: [[TheBestPageInTheUniverse Maddox's]] article [[http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=math "Math doesn't suck, you do."]] Though I'm not normally a fan of Maddox's writing, I can at least respect his more intelligent arguments. This, on the other hand, is pure garbage. Firstly, he says that math is "exactly like cooking: just follow the recipe." Uh, no. If that were the case, famous chefs everywhere would have aced calculus. Even if both are based on following instructions, it's very possible that one may find one of those things less interesting than the other. He then goes on to imply that textbooks teach you everything about math you need to know for your classes, ergo it should be easy. Clearly he didn't go to the schools I or a large number of other students went to. After rambling some factoids that have little to do with his argument, he uses a [[StrawmanFallacy strawman point of view which happens to be easy for him to deride]]: "When will I ever use math in life?" Firstly, nobody says that; people specifically refer to algebra, geometry, calculus and the like, because it's a hugely valid observation that many jobs do not require such advanced concepts. He patronizingly points out that every job DOES involve using math...forgetting to mention that it's simple arithmetic a good deal of the time, which nobody doubts in the first place. Finally, he continues rambling about how math has been important to the advancement of civilization, which is once again [[CaptainObvious something we already have been fully aware of since elementary school]]. Maddox, sucking at math doesn't automatically make you an idiot, because not everyone's brain is as skilled in problem solving as they are in other methods of thinking, and there's only so much that education can do to remedy that. Long story short, it's one of Maddox's shittiest and most misguided arguments for anything ever. It's possible that in some places he's exaggerating the reader's stupidity for the purpose of his Viewers Are Morons schtick, but a lot of the article comes off as the actual man behind the Maddox personality talking, and thus there's no excuse for how poorly the article is thought out.
14th Mar '17 7:48:35 PM ImSpidey2
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* I'm not that much of a fan of TechRax. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing [[WebVideo/Pyrocynical]] trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tech seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, TechRax. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".

to:

* I'm not that much of a fan of TechRax.[=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing [[WebVideo/Pyrocynical]] trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tech Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[Squick As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, TechRax.Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".
14th Mar '17 7:46:44 PM ImSpidey2
Is there an issue? Send a Message


Actually, most of the reasons aren't bad and the author has some good points even though I disagree with them. However, reason #2, "[[http://whatculture.com/film/10-reasons-frozen-definitely-disneys-best-animated-movie-decade.php/10 Elsa Is Kind Of A B*TCH]]" just stinks. It uses BlatantLies and [[MetaphoricallyTrue deliberately misleading half-truths]] to make Elsa look bad. Well, either that or we have a case of CriticalResearchFailure. The author claims that Elsa "was so wrapped up in her own problem she didn’t even notice she was damning an entire kingdom", even though it's obvious from watching the movie that Elsa at that point has no reason to believe her powers can have such devastating effects. He claims that Elsa doesn't even bother to try to thaw the kingdom, but fails to take into account that she has no idea how to do it and that returning to Arendelle would probably just make everything worse. He claims that Elsa shuts Anna out because she doesn't give a damn about her, when the film clearly shows that Elsa cares for Anna and is forced to shut her out to keep her from getting hurt. He also makes it sound like Elsa intentionally [[spoiler:freezes Anna's heart]], even though Elsa doesn't (it happened while she was not thinking straight) and is clearly horrified when she sees what has happened.\\

to:

Actually, most of the reasons aren't bad and the author has some good points even though I disagree with them. However, reason #2, "[[http://whatculture.com/film/10-reasons-frozen-definitely-disneys-best-animated-movie-decade.php/10 Elsa Is Kind Of A B*TCH]]" just stinks. It uses BlatantLies and [[MetaphoricallyTrue deliberately misleading half-truths]] to make Elsa look bad. Well, either that or we have a case of CriticalResearchFailure. The author claims that Elsa "was so wrapped up in her own problem she didn’t didn’t even notice she was damning an entire kingdom", even though it's obvious from watching the movie that Elsa at that point has no reason to believe her powers can have such devastating effects. He claims that Elsa doesn't even bother to try to thaw the kingdom, but fails to take into account that she has no idea how to do it and that returning to Arendelle would probably just make everything worse. He claims that Elsa shuts Anna out because she doesn't give a damn about her, when the film clearly shows that Elsa cares for Anna and is forced to shut her out to keep her from getting hurt. He also makes it sound like Elsa intentionally [[spoiler:freezes Anna's heart]], even though Elsa doesn't (it happened while she was not thinking straight) and is clearly horrified when she sees what has happened.\\


Added DiffLines:

* I'm not that much of a fan of TechRax. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing [[WebVideo/Pyrocynical]] trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tech seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, TechRax. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".
13th Mar '17 8:38:14 AM Sugarp1e1
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Sugarp1e1: PhantomStrider (real name: Josh Strider) is a CausticCritic from Australia who is often described as a less angry, more forgiving [[TheMysteriousMrEnter Mysterious Mr. Enter]] with better editing. Unlike most [[CausticCritic Caustic Critics]] however, he does almost all of his reviews in the form of lists. He's also pretty humble, admitting to being biased at times and making it clear in all of the intros to his videos that he's not a FanHater (As you can see in the flavor text). But the former didn't become more blatantly obvious than in his [[https://youtu.be/-0MxCQmlmmE Top 10 Worst Cartoon Remakes list]]. It was pretty good for the most part. There's just three things I didn't like and/or understand. 1) I'm confused as to how the [[spoiler:Powerpuff Girls]] reboot wasn't at #10 considering he was the least critical of it compared to the others on the list. 2) I didn't really understand the TakeThat against the trailer for the new Ghostbusters movie. I know that the all-female cast didn't get a very warm welcome, but if there's one thing I know, it's that [[NeverTrustATrailer trailers can't be trusted]]. You don't know if the movie gonna be good regardless of the cast or not. But the DMoS for me is his #1 pick: [[spoiler:every single Franchise/ScoobyDoo remake in existence]]! Look, I don't care if he doesn't like [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]]; that's his opinion. But his reason behind his #1 pick shows just how biased he can be. Strider's criticisms about [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] are legitimate, if debatable (he found the show formulaic, boring and "nothing special"), but his only criticism about all of the remakes that followed was basically "The original was never any good to begin with, so the franchise should have died years ago!" In his defense, if I remember correctly, I think he did mention at some point that he doesn't feel like any of the remakes added anything new or interesting to the series. But even if he did, it was completely overshadowed by his rant about how annoyed he is that the franchise is still going after 40 years despite the original's lack of appeal to him. I totally understand where he's coming from; I get pretty surprised myself when I find out something that came out when I was a kid is still going on to this day, especially if it's a show I don't like. But I wouldn't be so annoyed as to place the entire franchise at #1 on a Worst Remakes list and bash it simply because of it's lifespan and the quality of the original alone. Not to mention that he seems to think that [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] is, like the other remakes he mentions, exactly the same as the original. Oh, and Strider seemed to have [[TookALevelInJerkass taken a level in jerkass]] for this entry. Usually, he just expresses his distaste in a professional and witty manner like the classy DeadpanSnarker he is. Here it sounds more like he's trying to rally all of his viewers against the franchise, what with him having the gall to assume that nobody actively watches [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] anyway, asking "Has any kid ever sat down and said, 'Oh, look! [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] is on!'?", and claiming that kids only watch it when there's nothing better to watch. Excuse me Strider, but I watched both [[spoiler: What's New, Scooby-Doo?]] and [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] regularly when I was a kid and loved them. Again, this is coming from a guy who claims to be fine with people liking something he doesn't. This assumption is not only hypocritical and insulting, it makes no sense. If a series has been remade over 19 times, then it must have some sort of fanbase otherwise it wouldn't have been remade even once! Even worse? In his [[https://youtu.be/IlkvxV1laO8 Top 10 Best Disney Movies list]], he references the angry comments he got from this in a gag where he calmly says "[[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] kinda... sucks?" before being pelted by tomatoes. As if he was being totally reasonable with his decision and the viewers were the ones being ridiculous! Can someone please remind him that he specifically described his #2 pick, [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], as "the devil's anus of bad"? If he thinks [[spoiler:the entire Scooby-Doo franchise]] is even worse than [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], then "it kinda sucks" isn't even close to what he was saying. Not only that, but judging by Strider's comment about [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/N95f7baE0as?list=PLfji1gVKy4fYaePq-q1ox2S24X8VZbelZ Top 10 Worst Cartoon Live Action Remakes list]], he seems to think that the only people who are mad at him for this are the [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] fans. Implying that he genuinely believes that all of those angry comments were from the FanDumb as opposed to some belonging to those who saw just how biased he was being. I was so disappointed with him, I couldn't bring myself to listen to him re-explain why he hates [[spoiler:Scooby Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/P9NLefklYK8 Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes list]] and skipped over it. (But judging by his added comment of "Forever" in the entry title, he was trying to justify cramming the entire franchise on the top spot of his Worst Remakes list). I don't believe in Unsubscribing, so I'll continue to watch his videos. But you'd think somebody who claims to enjoy engaging in intelligent conversation would have a better reason for his #1 pick than "there's too many remakes".

to:

* Sugarp1e1: Tropers/Sugarp1e1: PhantomStrider (real name: Josh Strider) is a CausticCritic from Australia who is often described as a less angry, more forgiving [[TheMysteriousMrEnter Mysterious Mr. Enter]] with better editing. Unlike most [[CausticCritic Caustic Critics]] however, he does almost all of his reviews in the form of lists. He's also pretty humble, admitting to being biased at times and making it clear in all of the intros to his videos that he's not a FanHater (As you can see in the flavor text). But the former didn't become more blatantly obvious than in his [[https://youtu.be/-0MxCQmlmmE Top 10 Worst Cartoon Remakes list]]. It was pretty good for the most part. There's just three things I didn't like and/or understand. 1) I'm confused as to how the [[spoiler:Powerpuff Girls]] reboot wasn't at #10 considering he was the least critical of it compared to the others on the list. 2) I didn't really understand the TakeThat against the trailer for the new Ghostbusters movie. I know that the all-female cast didn't get a very warm welcome, but if there's one thing I know, it's that [[NeverTrustATrailer trailers can't be trusted]]. You don't know if the movie gonna be good regardless of the cast or not. But the DMoS for me is his #1 pick: [[spoiler:every single Franchise/ScoobyDoo remake in existence]]! Look, I don't care if he doesn't like [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]]; that's his opinion. But his reason behind his #1 pick shows just how biased he can be. Strider's criticisms about [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] are legitimate, if debatable (he found the show formulaic, boring and "nothing special"), but his only criticism about all of the remakes that followed was basically "The original was never any good to begin with, so the franchise should have died years ago!" In his defense, if I remember correctly, I think he did mention at some point that he doesn't feel like any of the remakes added anything new or interesting to the series. But even if he did, it was completely overshadowed by his rant about how annoyed he is that the franchise is still going after 40 years despite the original's lack of appeal to him. I totally understand where he's coming from; I get pretty surprised myself when I find out something that came out when I was a kid is still going on to this day, especially if it's a show I don't like. But I wouldn't be so annoyed as to place the entire franchise at #1 on a Worst Remakes list and bash it simply because of it's lifespan and the quality of the original alone. Not to mention that he seems to think that [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] is, like the other remakes he mentions, exactly the same as the original. Oh, and Strider seemed to have [[TookALevelInJerkass taken a level in jerkass]] for this entry. Usually, he just expresses his distaste in a professional and witty manner like the classy DeadpanSnarker he is. Here it sounds more like he's trying to rally all of his viewers against the franchise, what with him having the gall to assume that nobody actively watches [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] anyway, asking "Has any kid ever sat down and said, 'Oh, look! [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] is on!'?", and claiming that kids only watch it when there's nothing better to watch. Excuse me Strider, but I watched both [[spoiler: What's New, Scooby-Doo?]] and [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] regularly when I was a kid and loved them. Again, this is coming from a guy who claims to be fine with people liking something he doesn't. This assumption is not only hypocritical and insulting, it makes no sense. If a series has been remade over 19 times, then it must have some sort of fanbase otherwise it wouldn't have been remade even once! Even worse? In his [[https://youtu.be/IlkvxV1laO8 Top 10 Best Disney Movies list]], he references the angry comments he got from this in a gag where he calmly says "[[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] kinda... sucks?" before being pelted by tomatoes. As if he was being totally reasonable with his decision and the viewers were the ones being ridiculous! Can someone please remind him that he specifically described his #2 pick, [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], as "the devil's anus of bad"? If he thinks [[spoiler:the entire Scooby-Doo franchise]] is even worse than [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], then "it kinda sucks" isn't even close to what he was saying. Not only that, but judging by Strider's comment about [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/N95f7baE0as?list=PLfji1gVKy4fYaePq-q1ox2S24X8VZbelZ Top 10 Worst Cartoon Live Action Remakes list]], he seems to think that the only people who are mad at him for this are the [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] fans. Implying that he genuinely believes that all of those angry comments were from the FanDumb as opposed to some belonging to those who saw just how biased he was being. I was so disappointed with him, I couldn't bring myself to listen to him re-explain why he hates [[spoiler:Scooby Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/P9NLefklYK8 Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes list]] and skipped over it. (But judging by his added comment of "Forever" in the entry title, he was trying to justify cramming the entire franchise on the top spot of his Worst Remakes list). I don't believe in Unsubscribing, so I'll continue to watch his videos. But you'd think somebody who claims to enjoy engaging in intelligent conversation would have a better reason for his #1 pick than "there's too many remakes".
10th Mar '17 1:30:07 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a similar complaint from his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zJD9B0za9k Pokémon Bootlegs]] video. everything described above applies here: the video is absolutely fantastic. the jokes are on point and gut-bustingly hilarious, but there's one game he could have gone into more detail on, and that's VideoGame/PokemonVietnameseCrystal. He doesn't even go past the opening segment with Professor Oak before switching games. Given that this is a TranslationTrainwreck of [[MemeticMutation memetic degree]], I get that there's probably not much he could say about it that hasn't been said, but that doesn't mean one shouldn't try. [[TheyWasterAPerfectlyGoodPlot He could have at least gotten to]] "[[SugarWiki/CrowningMomentOfFunny BAG FUCK]]" [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot or something and ''then'' quit the game in disgust.]] Once again, I feel like this is one of JonTron's best videos that he's put out, but there was just that one thing he should have gone into more detail about, but didn't.

to:

** [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a similar complaint from his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zJD9B0za9k Pokémon Bootlegs]] video. everything described above applies here: the video is absolutely fantastic. the jokes are on point and gut-bustingly hilarious, but there's one game he could have gone into more detail on, and that's VideoGame/PokemonVietnameseCrystal. He doesn't even go past the opening segment with Professor Oak before switching games. Given that this is a TranslationTrainwreck of [[MemeticMutation memetic degree]], I get that there's probably not much he could say about it that hasn't been said, but that doesn't mean one shouldn't try. [[TheyWasterAPerfectlyGoodPlot [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot He could have at least gotten to]] "[[SugarWiki/CrowningMomentOfFunny BAG FUCK]]" [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot or something and ''then'' quit the game in disgust.]] Once again, I feel like this is one of JonTron's best videos that he's put out, but there was just that one thing he should have gone into more detail about, but didn't.
10th Mar '17 1:28:27 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a similar complaint from his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zJD9B0za9k Pokémon Bootlegs]] video. everything described above applies here: the video is absolutely fantastic. the jokes are on point and gut-bustingly hilarious, but there's one game he could have gone into more detail on, and that's VideoGame/PokemonVietnameseCrystal. He doesn't even go past the opening segment with Professor Oak before switching games. Given that this is a TranslationTrainwreck of [[MemeticMutation memetic degree]], I get that there's probably not much he could say about it that hasn't been said, but that doesn't mean one shouldn't try. [[TheyWasterAPerfectlyGoodPlot He could have at least gotten to]] "[[SugarWiki/CrowningMomentOfFunny BAG FUCK]]" [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot or something and ''then'' quit the game in disgust.]] Once again, I feel like this is one of JonTron's best videos that he's put out, but there was just that one thing he should have gone into more detail about, but didn't.
9th Mar '17 9:46:12 PM MrMediaGuy2
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/MrMediaGuy2: Normally, I usually have a lot of fun reading the scary stories on r/nosleep. But this story, [[https://www.reddit.com/r/nosleep/comments/1e91ez/wrong_way_charlie/ Wrong Way Charlie]], is probably the worst thing ever posted there. The story is about a four year-old boy who befriends a kitten, becoming very close to the animal. One day, he runs through the hall and ends up [[spoiler:stepping on the kitten and horribly injuring him. Then the boy's horrified mother [[MercyKill euthanizes the kitten]] by [[ThereIsNoKillLikeOverkill smashing his skull with a hammer]], [[ForcedToWatch right in front of]] both [[HarmfulToMinors the two children]] and the mother cat! All of this is done in graphic detail, with both the kitten meowing in agony and his [[{{Gorn}} brains and skull splattering all over the hallway]].]] The story wasn't scary at all, just [[NauseaFuel nauseating and gross]]. And it didn't even come with a [[ContentWarnings content warning]], unfortunate for a cat-lover like myself. I wonder if this story is the reason nosleep has a new rule about how awful content alone doesn't make a story scary.

to:

* Tropers/MrMediaGuy2: Normally, I usually have a lot of fun reading the scary stories on r/nosleep. But this story, [[https://www.reddit.com/r/nosleep/comments/1e91ez/wrong_way_charlie/ Wrong Way Charlie]], is probably the worst thing ever posted there. The story is about a four year-old boy who befriends a kitten, becoming very close to the animal. One day, he runs through the hall and ends up [[spoiler:stepping on the kitten and horribly injuring him. Then the boy's horrified mother [[MercyKill euthanizes the kitten]] by [[ThereIsNoKillLikeOverkill smashing his skull with a hammer]], [[ForcedToWatch right in front of]] both [[HarmfulToMinors the two children]] and the mother cat! All of this is done in graphic detail, with disturbing descriptions of both the kitten meowing in agony and his [[{{Gorn}} brains and skull splattering all over the hallway]].]] The story wasn't scary at all, just [[NauseaFuel nauseating and gross]]. And it didn't even come with a [[ContentWarnings content warning]], unfortunate for a cat-lover like myself. I wonder if this story is the reason nosleep has a new rule about how awful content alone doesn't make a story scary.
9th Mar '17 9:45:25 PM MrMediaGuy2
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/MrMediaGuy2: Normally, I usually have a lot of fun reading the scary stories on r/nosleep. But this story, [[https://www.reddit.com/r/nosleep/comments/1e91ez/wrong_way_charlie/ Wrong Way Charlie]], is probably the worst thing ever posted there. The story is about a four year-old boy who befriends a kitten, becoming very close to the animal. One day, he runs through the hall and ends up [[spoiler:stepping on the kitten and horribly injuring him. Then the boy's horrified mother [[MercyKill euthanizes the kitten]] by smashing his skull with a hammer, right in front of both the two children and the mother cat! All of this is done in graphic detail, with both the kitten meowing in agony and his [[{{Gorn}} brains and skull splattering all over the hallway]].]] The story wasn't scary at all, just [[NauseaFuel nauseating and gross]]. And it didn't even come with a [[ContentWarnings content warning]], unfortunate for a cat-lover like myself. I wonder if this story is the reason nosleep has a new rule about how awful content alone doesn't make a story scary.

to:

* Tropers/MrMediaGuy2: Normally, I usually have a lot of fun reading the scary stories on r/nosleep. But this story, [[https://www.reddit.com/r/nosleep/comments/1e91ez/wrong_way_charlie/ Wrong Way Charlie]], is probably the worst thing ever posted there. The story is about a four year-old boy who befriends a kitten, becoming very close to the animal. One day, he runs through the hall and ends up [[spoiler:stepping on the kitten and horribly injuring him. Then the boy's horrified mother [[MercyKill euthanizes the kitten]] by [[ThereIsNoKillLikeOverkill smashing his skull with a hammer, hammer]], [[ForcedToWatch right in front of of]] both [[HarmfulToMinors the two children children]] and the mother cat! All of this is done in graphic detail, with both the kitten meowing in agony and his [[{{Gorn}} brains and skull splattering all over the hallway]].]] The story wasn't scary at all, just [[NauseaFuel nauseating and gross]]. And it didn't even come with a [[ContentWarnings content warning]], unfortunate for a cat-lover like myself. I wonder if this story is the reason nosleep has a new rule about how awful content alone doesn't make a story scary.
9th Mar '17 12:02:05 AM BronyoftheOctaves
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say i would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet...then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.

to:

* %%* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say i would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet...then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.
7th Mar '17 5:51:53 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Animeking1108: While I enjoy Beyond The Black Rims by MarzGurl, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Op3UiD0p7o Episode 5]] was a waste of potential when they got to the part about the KingdomHearts HD Remix Collection. They talked about the collection itself for about 30 seconds before going on a 20 minute rant everyone and their mothers has heard about ''Kingdom Hearts 3'' not being made yet. I can pretty much watch the entire segment by going on a forum. They completely ignore the fact that it will contain the [[NoExportForYou Final Mix]], which fans have been waiting eleven years for. They even admit that they don't care how much the side games will clear any potential plot holes out. I expected better from you, Kaylyn.

to:

* Animeking1108: While I enjoy Beyond The Black Rims by MarzGurl, WebVideo/MarzGurl, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Op3UiD0p7o Episode 5]] was a waste of potential when they got to the part about the KingdomHearts HD Remix Collection. They talked about the collection itself for about 30 seconds before going on a 20 minute rant everyone and their mothers has heard about ''Kingdom Hearts 3'' not being made yet. I can pretty much watch the entire segment by going on a forum. They completely ignore the fact that it will contain the [[NoExportForYou Final Mix]], which fans have been waiting eleven years for. They even admit that they don't care how much the side games will clear any potential plot holes out. I expected better from you, Kaylyn.
6th Mar '17 5:22:09 AM JamesAustin
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/ParaChomp: "Search for the Worst: Suicide Squad". I will not argue against negative criticism against Movie/SuicideSquad, it's justified. What I will argue against are the constant questioning of the existence of various characters. One can see them as IHE pointing out them being unnecessary for the film but when he compared Killer Croc to Gorilla Grodd, you could tell that either wasn't the case or he's being too vague with the intentions of his words. There is nothing wrong with either of them as characters in terms of premise, same can be said about Captain Boomerang and Katana. All four of these characters have proven their worth in other pieces of media. There are so many characters who use trick weapons for combat and Katana was as relevant as ever due to WesternAnimation/BewareTheBatman. One of the film's problems are its many unnecessary characters but these characters have been well written in other media and have relevance to the source material which is something IHE doesn't acknowledge. I do realize that I am an IDIOT trying to win such an argument. This is someone who doesn't care about the history of comics nor their characters, only wants a good movie, and uses Aquaman and Kite Man as their Trope/ButtMonkey. Once again, the wound that the UsefulNotes/TheComicsCode has left shows its ugly face proving that even the Trope/DarkerAndEdgier adaptions can't hide it.

to:

* Tropers/ParaChomp: "Search for the Worst: Suicide Squad". I will not argue against negative criticism against Movie/SuicideSquad, ''Film/SuicideSquad2016'', it's justified. What I will argue against are the constant questioning of the existence of various characters. One can see them as IHE pointing out them being unnecessary for the film but when he compared Killer Croc to Gorilla Grodd, you could tell that either wasn't the case or he's being too vague with the intentions of his words. There is nothing wrong with either of them as characters in terms of premise, same can be said about Captain Boomerang and Katana. All four of these characters have proven their worth in other pieces of media. There are so many characters who use trick weapons for combat and Katana was as relevant as ever due to WesternAnimation/BewareTheBatman.''WesternAnimation/BewareTheBatman''. One of the film's problems are its many unnecessary characters but these characters have been well written in other media and have relevance to the source material which is something IHE doesn't acknowledge. I do realize that I am an IDIOT trying to win such an argument. This is someone who doesn't care about the history of comics nor their characters, only wants a good movie, and uses Aquaman and Kite Man as their Trope/ButtMonkey. Once again, the wound that the UsefulNotes/TheComicsCode has left shows its ugly face proving that even the Trope/DarkerAndEdgier adaptions can't hide it.
5th Mar '17 4:15:59 PM frnmmma25
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Frnmmma25: I disliked ''Website/{{TheOnion}}'' 's video about North Korea. It said that the U.S. is just like North Korea. Come on, we're fucked up in a lot of ways, but we don't have concentration camps! My brother said that he expected something better, that it wasn't even funny, and that they really are straying from what they were established to be.

to:

* Frnmmma25: I disliked ''Website/{{TheOnion}}'' 's video about North Korea. Korea, "Onion Explains: The Totalitarian State Of North Korea". It said was actually funny and witty... until all of a sudden it says that the U.S. is just like North Korea. "Where life there is exactly the same as life here." Come on, we're fucked up in a lot of ways, but we don't have concentration camps! Most of our economy doesn't come from prison slave labour, and we don't have a society where the social power is even more strict than the royal/regular power level from hundreds of years ago in Korea. Where almost all of the population is starving to death, and even haircuts are regulated by the police. Where even implying something can land you, your entire family, and the next two generations in prison camps. Even comparing it to the dictatorship that is China is out of line. REFUGEES from North Korea call China a paradise. "Whether it is men with guns keeping you in line, or corporations keeping you pacified with hamburgers and i pads". So you do you not like the police, or just want them to not have guns? It's one thing if it's guns, because at least it means that they are only implying that people with guns can hurt you, never mind that they have guns because a lot of people have guns in order to protect themselves, but if they're implying that we are just as oppressed because we have police, then you have another fucking problem. EVERY fucking country has police, and even in anarchic hellholes there are people who try to police the gangs. Who are you to tell me that we are oppressed because of this? If we're as fucked up as North Korea for having police (does North Korea even have a single non government buisness?) then you might as well call France a shit hellhole as well. Or even Canada. What? They have police. And they also have guns! Even if it's just mocking cynics who call any country better than America just because they don't notice those problems, it seems too spiteful, hateful, and arrogant for it to seem like it, much less get any enjoyment out of it. My brother told me about this, and said that he expected something better, that it wasn't even funny, and that they really are straying from what they were established to be.be. I agree with him.
4th Mar '17 9:35:05 AM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Troper/{{cookieman}}: We have Nyan Cat as fanart, crossovers (with such series as ''MarioKart'', ''RobotUnicornAttack'', and shirts and such). However, when you start to crossover something with [[http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=250305521674671&set=a.192924910746066.42399.132945776743980&type=1&theater 9/11]], then you know there's something wrong. (View at your own risk)

to:

* Troper/{{cookieman}}: We have Nyan Cat as fanart, crossovers (with such series as ''MarioKart'', ''RobotUnicornAttack'', ''VideoGame/MarioKart'', ''VideoGame/RobotUnicornAttack'', and shirts and such). However, when you start to crossover something with [[http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=250305521674671&set=a.192924910746066.42399.132945776743980&type=1&theater 9/11]], then you know there's something wrong. (View at your own risk)



* Uttergenius - Creator/TheQuarterGuy is easily one of my favorite Youtubers. His videos tend to be funny, informative, and all-around entertaining. Unfortunately, there's no excusing this moment from his collab with [=MaverickHunterZero75=], Top Twenty VideoGame/MarioKart Tracks. During the [[VideoGame/MarioKart8 Cloudtop Cruise]] segment in Part 2, Ben (Maverick) takes a moment to listen to the music: it's a [[RecurringRiff remix]] of [[VideoGame/SuperMarioGalaxy "Gusty Garden Galaxy"]]. He then jokes that Super Mario Galaxy 3 has been confirmed. In response, Adam (QG) vehemently shoots down this idea, claiming that the first game didn't need a [[VideoGame/SuperMarioGalaxy2 sequel]]. This moment was completely uncalled for. Not only is bashing a game for simply existing pure HateDumb, but Adam had no right to say that when [[{{Hypocrite}} he's constantly pestering Capcom for a new Mega Man game.]] A pretty low moment from an otherwise awesome youtuber.

to:

* Uttergenius - Creator/TheQuarterGuy is easily one of my favorite Youtubers. His videos tend to be funny, informative, and all-around entertaining. Unfortunately, there's no excusing this moment from his collab with [=MaverickHunterZero75=], Top Twenty VideoGame/MarioKart ''VideoGame/MarioKart'' Tracks. During the [[VideoGame/MarioKart8 Cloudtop Cruise]] segment in Part 2, Ben (Maverick) takes a moment to listen to the music: it's a [[RecurringRiff remix]] of [[VideoGame/SuperMarioGalaxy "Gusty Garden Galaxy"]]. He then jokes that Super Mario Galaxy 3 has been confirmed. In response, Adam (QG) vehemently shoots down this idea, claiming that the first game didn't need a [[VideoGame/SuperMarioGalaxy2 sequel]]. This moment was completely uncalled for. Not only is bashing a game for simply existing pure HateDumb, but Adam had no right to say that when [[{{Hypocrite}} he's constantly pestering Capcom for a new Mega Man game.]] A pretty low moment from an otherwise awesome youtuber.
3rd Mar '17 9:17:13 PM MrMediaGuy2
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/MrMediaGuy2: Normally, I usually have a lot of fun reading the scary stories on r/nosleep. But this story, [[https://www.reddit.com/r/nosleep/comments/1e91ez/wrong_way_charlie/ Wrong Way Charlie]], is probably the worst thing ever posted there. The story is about a four year-old boy who befriends a kitten, becoming very close to the animal. One day, he runs through the hall and ends up [[spoiler:stepping on the kitten and horribly injuring him. Then the boy's horrified mother [[MercyKill euthanizes the kitten]] by smashing his skull with a hammer, right in front of both the two children and the mother cat! All of this is done in graphic detail, with both the kitten meowing in agony and his [[{{Gorn}} brains and skull splattering all over the hallway]].]] The story wasn't scary at all, just [[NauseaFuel nauseating and gross]]. And it didn't even come with a [[ContentWarnings content warning]], unfortunate for a cat-lover like myself. I wonder if this story is the reason nosleep has a new rule about how awful content alone doesn't make a story scary.
2nd Mar '17 4:34:11 PM shoboni
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/{{shoboni]] I love WebVideo/SomeOrdinaryGamers but Mutahar dropped the ball when he did a video about an alleged [[PedoHunt Youtube Pedophile Ring]] months after another Youtuber named Reignbot that also deals with disturbing online content thoroughly debunked it as fear-mongering and explained how it's actually harmful to spread such hysteria.

to:

* Tropers/{{shoboni]] Tropers/{{shoboni}}: I love WebVideo/SomeOrdinaryGamers but Mutahar dropped the ball when he did a video about an alleged [[PedoHunt Youtube Pedophile Ring]] months after another Youtuber named Reignbot that also deals with disturbing online content thoroughly debunked it as fear-mongering and explained how it's actually harmful to spread such hysteria.
2nd Mar '17 4:33:29 PM shoboni
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/{{shoboni]] I love WebVideo/SomeOrdinaryGamers but Mutahar dropped the ball when he did a video about an alleged [[PedoHunt Youtube Pedophile Ring]] months after another Youtuber named Reignbot that also deals with disturbing online content thoroughly debunked it as fear-mongering and explained how it's actually harmful to spread such hysteria.
28th Feb '17 6:55:45 AM GreenFablesInverness
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** GreenFablesInverness: And come season four this show has not gotten any better in its treatment of its characters. While it’s meant to be a throwaway joke, Ruby laughing at Juane’s bunny hoodie is frankly insulting to my intelligence because it is a regression of character development the past few seasons have worked so hard to deconstruct the traditional but toxic stereotyping. One, Juane’s masculinity, or rather lack thereof, is the butt monkey yet again when a key part of his S1 character arc was getting away from poisonous macho man mindset. It’s what almost got him killed against Grimm biting off more than he could chew. And who help him confront his weakness and move on towards self-improvement? Oh yeah, Pyrrha, the girl he cared for and lost and we see a moment later used his memento of her being integrated into his weapon’s shield so a piece of her spirit will remain fighting alongside Team JNRP. The girl who accepted Juane for who he was and was everything she wanted in life; somebody that didn’t put her on a pedestal instead treating her like a real person. As if laughing at Juane wasn’t bad enough, Ruby laughing at the cereal icon is even worse because it’s a brown bunny and who else is a brown bunny? Fan favorite Velvet Scarlatina! The girl who had to fight tooth and nail to prove despite her cute looks she was as lethal as any other huntress. Her weapon is a fusion of every kickass weapon we’ve seen Beacon’s students use. She copies their fighting style into her own combat tactics to take on a horde of Grimm like the badass she is. That her weapon was Monty’s favorite. Remember the faunus girl who got picked on in season 1 by Cardin and his team for her bunny ears to demonstrate what kind of jerks they were and the discrimination faunus face? Yeah, the same group of bullies that would go on to antagonize and blackmail Juane! Yeah, they can make the excuse the deaths of Pyrrha and Penny were “planned from the start to demonstrate no one in safe in the world of Remnant” until they’re blue but this is just mounting evidence that RT doesn’t make an effort to respect their characters, the audience’s intelligence, or even their own writing integrity.
27th Feb '17 10:01:14 AM Sugarp1e1
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Sugarp1e1: I agree. What especially ticks me off about this video is hotdiggitydemon feeling the need to AccentuateTheNegative despite finding the reboot SoOkayItsAverage. Which is it? Is it average or is it bad? There's a difference, you know.

to:

** Sugarp1e1: Tropers/{{Sugarp1e1}}: I agree. What especially ticks me off about this video is hotdiggitydemon feeling the need to AccentuateTheNegative despite finding the reboot SoOkayItsAverage. Which is it? Is it average or is it bad? There's a difference, you know.


Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/{{Sugarp1e1}}: The 7th entry of TheMetalBlade5's [[https://youtu.be/LUy-iKZDeNk Top 10 Worst Video Game Reviews I've Seen list]]. In the beginning of the video, he claims that he has no problem with people liking something he doesn't and that he was only going to focus on the reviews themselves. Yet when he gets to his 7th entry, he starts going on this long rant about how [[spoiler:Shadow of Memories]] is an objectively bad game and how everyone who gave it a positive review is wrong. This entry felt more like a review on the game than a review on the reviews it got. And the hypocrisy gets worse at the end of the video when he tells the narrator of the #1 review on the list that he should respect people's opinions on the game. I don't know about you, but telling people their objectively wrong for liking something you don't isn't respecting their opinion. [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking Also, his yelling literally gave me a headache]].
26th Feb '17 8:17:39 AM tvlegend
Is there an issue? Send a Message
26th Feb '17 3:48:45 AM Anicomicgeek
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* ''DethroningMoment/BennettTheSage''


Added DiffLines:

** ''DethroningMoment/BennettTheSage''
22nd Feb '17 11:59:31 AM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** ''SenorCornholio'': Fourthed. I'm honestly the first troper on this segment to have enjoyed this video for the most part, with things like bomb bowling and calling out the Gorons for being such picky eaters being highlights. However, I will admit it had some serious flaws: the points he made were more YMMV than actual bad game design, his jabs at Skyward Sword were unneeded and deviated from the rest of the video entirely, [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking and he said twice that Impa was the one that gave you the letter instead of Zelda]]. However, those aren't my main gripes. See, I could understand talking about Skyward Sword and using Ocarina of Time as a way to show how the ideas adopted in that game ended up forming this "spoiled rich kid" in the series. That's fine...then along comes the part where he talks about A Link Between Worlds. He goes to countless lengths praising how greatly implemented its mechanics were, while taking extra shots at Skyward Sword and Twilight Princess. Hey guys, did you know!? [[CaptainObvious Egoraptor doesn't like 3D Zeldas!]] I just thought he didn't hammer it into your heads enough! And what's more is that, just like his gripes with Skyward Sword, they were really not needed at all. Yes, the Spinner was hardly ever used, and the Magic Armor was a terrible, ''terrible'' item, but did he really need to mention that? It feels more like this segment existed to toot Arin's own horn and complain about more 3D mechanics, and it also felt shoehorned in due to Arin playing the game and liking it. I love [[GirlChanInParadise most]] [[Music/StarBomb of]] [[WebVideo/GameGrumps Arin's]] [[WebAnimation/AwesomeSeries work,]] I enjoy him as a creator, and I know he's a good person in real life, but this was just a dumb moment in an already polarizing review.

to:

** ''SenorCornholio'': Fourthed. I'm honestly the first troper on this segment to have enjoyed this video for the most part, with things like bomb bowling and calling out the Gorons for being such picky eaters being highlights. However, I will admit it had some serious flaws: the points he made were more YMMV than actual bad game design, his jabs at ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaSkywardSword Skyward Sword Sword]]'' were unneeded and deviated from the rest of the video entirely, [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking and he said twice that Impa was the one that gave you the letter instead of Zelda]]. However, those aren't my main gripes. See, I could understand talking about Skyward Sword and using Ocarina of Time as a way to show how the ideas adopted in that game ended up forming this "spoiled rich kid" in the series. That's fine...then along comes the part where he talks about ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaALinkBetweenWorlds A Link Between Worlds. Worlds]]''. He goes to countless lengths praising how greatly implemented its mechanics were, while taking extra shots at Skyward Sword ''Skyward Sword'' and ''[[VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaTwilightPrincess Twilight Princess.Princess]]''. Hey guys, did you know!? [[CaptainObvious Egoraptor doesn't like 3D Zeldas!]] I just thought he didn't hammer it into your heads enough! And what's more is that, just like his gripes with Skyward Sword, they were really not needed at all. Yes, the Spinner was hardly ever used, and the Magic Armor was a terrible, ''terrible'' item, very situational item (until the HD release where you can get a much bigger wallet, anyway), but did he really need to mention that? any of this? It feels more like this segment existed to toot Arin's own horn and complain about more 3D mechanics, and it also felt shoehorned in due to Arin playing the game ''ABLW'' and liking it. I love [[GirlChanInParadise most]] [[Music/StarBomb of]] [[WebVideo/GameGrumps Arin's]] [[WebAnimation/AwesomeSeries work,]] I enjoy him as a creator, and I know he's a good person in real life, but this was just a dumb pointless moment in an already polarizing review.
18th Feb '17 3:31:33 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** SenorCornholio: I have recently warmed up to Racist Mario due to the voice clips being used in some of [[Machinima/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers SMG4's videos]] (such as [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjb0FgQqpZA this one]]), but that doesn't change the fact that overall, this video is heavily flawed in more ways than one. I could go on about the unfunny jokes, the nonsensical plot, etc, but what I think makes the whole thing fall apart: the premise. Mario goes insane and starts killing everyone because of all the third-party characters in the current race. Why does this not work? Well firstly, because there has never been a third-party character in a main Mario Kart title. The DLC characters for Mario Kart 8 were all from other Nintendo franchises, and therefore first-party. Secondly, the characters themselves; [[VideoGame/SegaSuperstars Sonic may have been playable in several Sega-themed sports and racing titles]], but the only time he crossed over with Nintendo itself was in VideoGame/SuperSmashBros., which would have actually been a better setting due to [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog their]] [[VideoGame/MetalGear own]] [[Franchise/MegaMan selection]] [[VideoGame/PacMan of]] [[Franchise/StreetFighter third]]-[[VideoGame/FinalFantasyVII party]] [[{{VideoGame/Bayonetta}} characters]]. And even then, Knuckles wasn't even playable so that's out. It's like some of these franchises were listed all because of their racing titles, with [[Franchise/StarWars Anakin]] and [[VideoGame/CrashBandicoot Crash's head]] also being standout examples. Thirdly, speaking of Sony, was there an alternate universe I'm not aware of where Sony and Nintendo crossed over and [[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet Sackboy]] and [[VideoGame/GodOfWar Kratos]] were put into karts? I'll admit that Kratos driving a tiny kart is a funny sight, but what's the point? Ironically, there's one crossover that I doubt Flashgitz even knows he got right, and that's Pac-Man's head on a spear, since he was playable in the Arcade GP games developed by Namco-Bandai. Other than that, the rest of the references are shallow at best and make absolutely no sense at worst. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go watch [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKRJt4CDMY the version where all the violence is replaced with The Nutshack]]. It's somehow way better.

to:

** SenorCornholio: I have recently warmed up to Racist Mario due to the voice clips being used in some of [[Machinima/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers SMG4's videos]] (such as [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjb0FgQqpZA this one]]), but that doesn't change the fact that overall, this video is heavily flawed in more ways than one. I could go on about the unfunny jokes, the nonsensical plot, etc, but what I think makes the whole thing fall apart: the premise. Mario goes insane and starts killing everyone because of all the third-party characters in the current race. Why does this not work? Well firstly, because there has never been a third-party character in a main Mario Kart title. The DLC characters for Mario Kart 8 were all from other Nintendo franchises, and therefore first-party. Secondly, the characters themselves; [[VideoGame/SegaSuperstars Sonic may have been playable in several Sega-themed sports and racing titles]], but the only time he crossed over with Nintendo itself was in VideoGame/SuperSmashBros., VideoGame/SuperSmashBros, which would have actually been a better setting due to [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog their]] [[VideoGame/MetalGear own]] [[Franchise/MegaMan selection]] [[VideoGame/PacMan of]] [[Franchise/StreetFighter third]]-[[VideoGame/FinalFantasyVII party]] [[{{VideoGame/Bayonetta}} characters]]. And even then, Knuckles wasn't even playable so that's out. It's like some of these franchises were listed all because of their racing titles, with [[Franchise/StarWars Anakin]] and [[VideoGame/CrashBandicoot Crash's head]] also being standout examples. Thirdly, speaking of Sony, was there an alternate universe I'm not aware of where Sony and Nintendo crossed over and [[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet Sackboy]] and [[VideoGame/GodOfWar Kratos]] were put into karts? I'll admit that Kratos driving a tiny kart is a funny sight, but what's the point? Ironically, there's one crossover that I doubt Flashgitz even knows he got right, and that's Pac-Man's head on a spear, since he was playable in the Arcade GP games developed by Namco-Bandai. Other than that, the rest of the references are shallow at best and make absolutely no sense at worst. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go watch [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKRJt4CDMY the version where all the violence is replaced with The Nutshack]]. It's somehow way better.
18th Feb '17 3:30:59 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** SenorCornholio: I have recently warmed up to Racist Mario due to the voice clips being used in some of [[Machinima/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers SMG4's videos]] (such as [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjb0FgQqpZA this one]]), but that doesn't change the fact that overall, this video is heavily flawed in more ways than one. I could go on about the unfunny jokes, the nonsensical plot, etc, but what I think makes the whole thing fall apart: the premise. Mario goes insane and starts killing everyone because of all the third-party characters in the current race. Why does this not work? Well firstly, because there has never been a third-party character in a main Mario Kart title. The DLC characters for Mario Kart 8 were all from other Nintendo franchises, and therefore first-party. Secondly, the characters themselves; [[VideoGame/SegaSuperstars Sonic may have been playable in several Sega-themed sports and racing titles]], but the only time he crossed over with Nintendo itself was in VideoGame/SuperSmashBros. And even then, Knuckles wasn't even playable so that's out. It's like some of these franchises were listed all because of their racing titles, with [[Franchise/StarWars Anakin]] and [[VideoGame/CrashBandicoot Crash's head]] also being standout examples. Thirdly, speaking of Sony, was there an alternate universe I'm not aware of where Sony and Nintendo crossed over and [[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet Sackboy]] and [[VideoGame/GodOfWar Kratos]] were put into karts? I'll admit that Kratos driving a tiny kart is a funny sight, but what's the point? Ironically, there's one crossover that I doubt Flashgitz even knows he got right, and that's Pac-Man's head on a spear, since he was playable in the Arcade GP games developed by Namco-Bandai. Other than that, the rest of the references are shallow at best and make absolutely no sense at worst. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go watch [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKRJt4CDMY the version where all the violence is replaced with The Nutshack]]. It's somehow way better.

to:

** SenorCornholio: I have recently warmed up to Racist Mario due to the voice clips being used in some of [[Machinima/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers SMG4's videos]] (such as [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjb0FgQqpZA this one]]), but that doesn't change the fact that overall, this video is heavily flawed in more ways than one. I could go on about the unfunny jokes, the nonsensical plot, etc, but what I think makes the whole thing fall apart: the premise. Mario goes insane and starts killing everyone because of all the third-party characters in the current race. Why does this not work? Well firstly, because there has never been a third-party character in a main Mario Kart title. The DLC characters for Mario Kart 8 were all from other Nintendo franchises, and therefore first-party. Secondly, the characters themselves; [[VideoGame/SegaSuperstars Sonic may have been playable in several Sega-themed sports and racing titles]], but the only time he crossed over with Nintendo itself was in VideoGame/SuperSmashBros., which would have actually been a better setting due to [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog their]] [[VideoGame/MetalGear own]] [[Franchise/MegaMan selection]] [[VideoGame/PacMan of]] [[Franchise/StreetFighter third]]-[[VideoGame/FinalFantasyVII party]] [[{{VideoGame/Bayonetta}} characters]]. And even then, Knuckles wasn't even playable so that's out. It's like some of these franchises were listed all because of their racing titles, with [[Franchise/StarWars Anakin]] and [[VideoGame/CrashBandicoot Crash's head]] also being standout examples. Thirdly, speaking of Sony, was there an alternate universe I'm not aware of where Sony and Nintendo crossed over and [[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet Sackboy]] and [[VideoGame/GodOfWar Kratos]] were put into karts? I'll admit that Kratos driving a tiny kart is a funny sight, but what's the point? Ironically, there's one crossover that I doubt Flashgitz even knows he got right, and that's Pac-Man's head on a spear, since he was playable in the Arcade GP games developed by Namco-Bandai. Other than that, the rest of the references are shallow at best and make absolutely no sense at worst. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go watch [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKRJt4CDMY the version where all the violence is replaced with The Nutshack]]. It's somehow way better.
18th Feb '17 3:22:06 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** SenorCornholio: I have recently warmed up to Racist Mario due to the voice clips being used in some of [[Machinima/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers SMG4's videos]], but that doesn't change the fact that overall, this video is heavily flawed in more ways than one. I could go on about the unfunny jokes, the nonsensical plot, etc, but what I think makes the whole thing fall apart: the premise. Mario goes insane and starts killing everyone because of all the third-party characters in the current race. Why does this not work? Well firstly, because there has never been a third-party character in a main Mario Kart title. The DLC characters for Mario Kart 8 were all from other Nintendo franchises, and therefore first-party. Secondly, the characters themselves; [[VideoGame/SegaSuperstars Sonic may have been playable in several Sega-themed sports and racing titles]], but the only time he crossed over with Nintendo itself was in VideoGame/SuperSmashBros. And even then, Knuckles wasn't even playable so that's out. It's like some of these franchises were listed all because of their racing titles, with [[Franchise/StarWars Anakin]] and [[VideoGame/CrashBandicoot Crash's head]] also being standout examples. Thirdly, speaking of Sony, was there an alternate universe I'm not aware of where Sony and Nintendo crossed over and [[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet Sackboy]] and [[VideoGame/GodOfWar Kratos]] were put into karts? I'll admit that Kratos driving a tiny kart is a funny sight, but what's the point? Ironically, there's one crossover that I doubt Flashgitz even knows he got right, and that's Pac-Man's head on a spear, since he was playable in the Arcade GP games developed by Namco-Bandai. Other than that, the rest of the references are shallow at best and make absolutely no sense at worst. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go watch [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKRJt4CDMY the version where all the violence is replaced with The Nutshack]]. It's somehow way better.

to:

** SenorCornholio: I have recently warmed up to Racist Mario due to the voice clips being used in some of [[Machinima/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers SMG4's videos]], videos]] (such as [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjb0FgQqpZA this one]]), but that doesn't change the fact that overall, this video is heavily flawed in more ways than one. I could go on about the unfunny jokes, the nonsensical plot, etc, but what I think makes the whole thing fall apart: the premise. Mario goes insane and starts killing everyone because of all the third-party characters in the current race. Why does this not work? Well firstly, because there has never been a third-party character in a main Mario Kart title. The DLC characters for Mario Kart 8 were all from other Nintendo franchises, and therefore first-party. Secondly, the characters themselves; [[VideoGame/SegaSuperstars Sonic may have been playable in several Sega-themed sports and racing titles]], but the only time he crossed over with Nintendo itself was in VideoGame/SuperSmashBros. And even then, Knuckles wasn't even playable so that's out. It's like some of these franchises were listed all because of their racing titles, with [[Franchise/StarWars Anakin]] and [[VideoGame/CrashBandicoot Crash's head]] also being standout examples. Thirdly, speaking of Sony, was there an alternate universe I'm not aware of where Sony and Nintendo crossed over and [[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet Sackboy]] and [[VideoGame/GodOfWar Kratos]] were put into karts? I'll admit that Kratos driving a tiny kart is a funny sight, but what's the point? Ironically, there's one crossover that I doubt Flashgitz even knows he got right, and that's Pac-Man's head on a spear, since he was playable in the Arcade GP games developed by Namco-Bandai. Other than that, the rest of the references are shallow at best and make absolutely no sense at worst. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go watch [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKRJt4CDMY the version where all the violence is replaced with The Nutshack]]. It's somehow way better.
18th Feb '17 3:18:51 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a small bone to pick with a throwaway line in the WebOriginal/CollegeHumor video, "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNlAZLCGLuU Luigi Finally Snaps]]". The plot of the video involves Luigi [[WhatTheHellHero calling out Mario for basically getting the spotlight while the green plumber always plays second fiddle]]. The video was perfectly fine for the most part, but what [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy really grinds my gears]] is this: Mario mentions he at least had VideoGame/LuigisMansion which Luigi says was terrible. Okay, fine; no problem. I like the game, but I can see why others don't. Then Mario says "Luigi, it's-a [[UsefulNotes/NintendoGameCube GameCube]]; all of those games were terrible". [[BigWhat What!?]] And the [=GameCube=] hate apparently doesn't stop with this video; I recall them often repeatedly bashing the system in several videos. Okay, first of all: all [=GameCube=] games are terrible? I don't know about you, but I had fond memories of playing my [=GameCube=], and several others did as well. I remember playing the heck out of VideoGame/SuperMarioSunshine, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaTheWindWaker, [[VideoGame/SonicAdventure2 Sonic Adventure 2 Battle]], and VideoGame/PaperMarioTheThousandYearDoor. And that's not even going into [[VideoGame/MetroidPrime several other]] [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil6 games that I]] [[VideoGame/StarFoxAssault missed out on]]. In fact, a lot of these "terrible" games have become fan favorites in recent years; heck ''Wind Waker'' got an HD re-release on the UsefulNotes/WiiU. Really, it's like these guys only think that [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks even for the most arbitrary change, the game automatically sucks]]. Second, putting all [=GameCube=] games in the same category of awful is a stupid generalization. I never had any interest in the UsefulNotes/Xbox360; does that mean all Xbox 360 games are terrible because of that? No; it just means I never took an interest in it! I may have merely mentioned this moment because I grew up with a [=GameCube=], but even if I wasn't a [=GameCube=] owner I would be headdesking so hard at this moment.

to:

* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a small bone to pick with a throwaway line in the WebOriginal/CollegeHumor video, "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNlAZLCGLuU Luigi Finally Snaps]]". The plot of the video involves Luigi [[WhatTheHellHero calling out Mario for basically getting the spotlight while the green plumber always plays second fiddle]]. The video was perfectly fine for the most part, but what [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy really grinds my gears]] is this: Mario mentions he at least had VideoGame/LuigisMansion which Luigi says was terrible. Okay, fine; no problem. I like the game, but I can see why others don't. Then Mario says "Luigi, it's-a [[UsefulNotes/NintendoGameCube GameCube]]; all of those games were terrible". [[BigWhat What!?]] And the [=GameCube=] hate apparently doesn't stop with this video; I recall them often repeatedly bashing the system in several videos. Okay, first of all: all [=GameCube=] games are terrible? I don't know about you, but I had fond memories of playing my [=GameCube=], and several others did as well. I remember playing the heck out of VideoGame/SuperMarioSunshine, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaTheWindWaker, [[VideoGame/SonicAdventure2 Sonic Adventure 2 Battle]], and VideoGame/PaperMarioTheThousandYearDoor. And that's not even going into [[VideoGame/MetroidPrime several other]] [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil6 games that I]] [[VideoGame/StarFoxAssault missed out on]]. In fact, a lot of these "terrible" games have become fan favorites in recent years; heck ''Wind Waker'' got an HD re-release on the UsefulNotes/WiiU. Really, it's like these guys only think that [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks even for the most arbitrary change, the game automatically sucks]]. Second, putting all [=GameCube=] games in the same category of awful is a stupid generalization. I never had any interest in the UsefulNotes/Xbox360; does that mean all Xbox 360 games are terrible because of that? No; it just means I never took an interest in it! Not every [=GameCube=] game is ''Aquaman: Battle For Atlantis'', and not every Xbox 360 game is VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog2006. I may have merely mentioned this moment because I grew up with a [=GameCube=], but even if I wasn't a [=GameCube=] owner I would be headdesking so hard at this moment.
17th Feb '17 5:04:21 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a small bone to pick with a throwaway line in the WebOriginal/CollegeHumor video, "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNlAZLCGLuU Luigi Finally Snaps]]". The plot of the video involves Luigi [[WhatTheHellHero calling out Mario for basically getting the spotlight while the green plumber always plays second fiddle]]. The video was perfectly fine for the most part, but what [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy really grinds my gears]] is this: Mario mentions he at least had VideoGame/LuigisMansion which Luigi says was terrible. Okay, fine; no problem. I like the game, but I can see why others don't. Then Mario says "Luigi, it's-a [[UsefulNotes/NintendoGameCube GameCube]]; all of those games were terrible". [[BigWhat What!?]] And the [=GameCube=] hate apparently doesn't stop with this video; I recall them often repeatedly bashing the system in several videos. Okay, first of all: all [=GameCube=] games are terrible? I don't know about you, but I had fond memories of playing my [=GameCube=], and several others did as well. I remember playing the heck out of VideoGame/SuperMarioSunshine, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaThewindWaker, [[VideoGame/SonicAdventure2 Sonic Adventure 2 Battle]], and VideoGame/PaperMarioTheThousandYearDoor. And that's not even going into [[VideoGame/MetroidPrime several other]] [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil6 games that I]] [[VideoGame/StarFoxAssault missed out on]]. In fact, a lot of these "terrible" games have become fan favorites in recent years; heck ''Wind Waker'' got an HD re-release on the UsefulNotes/WiiU. Really, it's like these guys only think that [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks even for the most arbitrary change, the game automatically sucks]]. Second, putting all [=GameCube=] games in the same category of awful is a stupid generalization. I never had any interest in the UsefulNotes/Xbox360; does that mean all Xbox 360 games are terrible because of that? No; it just means I never took an interest in it! I may have merely mentioned this moment because I grew up with a [=GameCube=], but even if I wasn't a [=GameCube=] owner I would be headdesking so hard at this moment.

to:

* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a small bone to pick with a throwaway line in the WebOriginal/CollegeHumor video, "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNlAZLCGLuU Luigi Finally Snaps]]". The plot of the video involves Luigi [[WhatTheHellHero calling out Mario for basically getting the spotlight while the green plumber always plays second fiddle]]. The video was perfectly fine for the most part, but what [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy really grinds my gears]] is this: Mario mentions he at least had VideoGame/LuigisMansion which Luigi says was terrible. Okay, fine; no problem. I like the game, but I can see why others don't. Then Mario says "Luigi, it's-a [[UsefulNotes/NintendoGameCube GameCube]]; all of those games were terrible". [[BigWhat What!?]] And the [=GameCube=] hate apparently doesn't stop with this video; I recall them often repeatedly bashing the system in several videos. Okay, first of all: all [=GameCube=] games are terrible? I don't know about you, but I had fond memories of playing my [=GameCube=], and several others did as well. I remember playing the heck out of VideoGame/SuperMarioSunshine, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaThewindWaker, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaTheWindWaker, [[VideoGame/SonicAdventure2 Sonic Adventure 2 Battle]], and VideoGame/PaperMarioTheThousandYearDoor. And that's not even going into [[VideoGame/MetroidPrime several other]] [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil6 games that I]] [[VideoGame/StarFoxAssault missed out on]]. In fact, a lot of these "terrible" games have become fan favorites in recent years; heck ''Wind Waker'' got an HD re-release on the UsefulNotes/WiiU. Really, it's like these guys only think that [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks even for the most arbitrary change, the game automatically sucks]]. Second, putting all [=GameCube=] games in the same category of awful is a stupid generalization. I never had any interest in the UsefulNotes/Xbox360; does that mean all Xbox 360 games are terrible because of that? No; it just means I never took an interest in it! I may have merely mentioned this moment because I grew up with a [=GameCube=], but even if I wasn't a [=GameCube=] owner I would be headdesking so hard at this moment.
17th Feb '17 5:03:08 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a small bone to pick with a throwaway line in the WebOriginal/CollegeHumor video, "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNlAZLCGLuU Luigi Finally Snaps]]". The plot of the video involves Luigi [[WhatTheHellHero calling out Mario for basically getting the spotlight while the green plumber always plays second fiddle]]. The video was perfectly fine for the most part, but what [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy really grinds my gears]] is this: Mario mentions he at least had VideoGame/LuigisMansion which Luigi says was terrible. Okay, fine; no problem. I like the game, but I can see why others don't. Then Mario says "Luigi, it's-a UsefulNotes/GameCube; all of those games were terrible". [[BigWhat What!?]] And the GameCube hate apparently doesn't stop there; I recall them often repeatedly bashing the system in several videos. Okay, first of all: all GameCube games are terrible? I don't know about you, but I had fond memories of playing my GameCube, and several others did as well. I remember playing the heck out of VideoGame/SuperMarioSunshine, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaThewindWaker, [[VideoGame/SonicAdventure2 Sonic Adventure 2 Battle]], and VideoGame/PaperMarioTheThousandYearDoor. And that's not even going into [[VideoGame/MetroidPrime several other]] [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil6 games that I]] [[VideoGame/StarFoxAssault missed out on]]. In fact, a lot of these "terrible" games have become fan favorites in recent years; heck ''Wind Waker'' got an HD release on the Wii U. Really, it's like these guys only think that [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks even for the most arbitrary change, the game automatically sucks]]. Second, putting all GameCube games in the same category of awful is a stupid generalization. I never had any interest in the Xbox 360; does that mean all Xbox 360 games are terrible because of that? No; it just means I never took an interest in it! I may have merely mentioned this moment because I grew up with a GameCube, but even if I wasn't a GameCube owner I would be headdesking so hard at this moment.

to:

* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a small bone to pick with a throwaway line in the WebOriginal/CollegeHumor video, "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNlAZLCGLuU Luigi Finally Snaps]]". The plot of the video involves Luigi [[WhatTheHellHero calling out Mario for basically getting the spotlight while the green plumber always plays second fiddle]]. The video was perfectly fine for the most part, but what [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy really grinds my gears]] is this: Mario mentions he at least had VideoGame/LuigisMansion which Luigi says was terrible. Okay, fine; no problem. I like the game, but I can see why others don't. Then Mario says "Luigi, it's-a UsefulNotes/GameCube; [[UsefulNotes/NintendoGameCube GameCube]]; all of those games were terrible". [[BigWhat What!?]] And the GameCube [=GameCube=] hate apparently doesn't stop there; with this video; I recall them often repeatedly bashing the system in several videos. Okay, first of all: all GameCube [=GameCube=] games are terrible? I don't know about you, but I had fond memories of playing my GameCube, [=GameCube=], and several others did as well. I remember playing the heck out of VideoGame/SuperMarioSunshine, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaThewindWaker, [[VideoGame/SonicAdventure2 Sonic Adventure 2 Battle]], and VideoGame/PaperMarioTheThousandYearDoor. And that's not even going into [[VideoGame/MetroidPrime several other]] [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil6 games that I]] [[VideoGame/StarFoxAssault missed out on]]. In fact, a lot of these "terrible" games have become fan favorites in recent years; heck ''Wind Waker'' got an HD release re-release on the Wii U.UsefulNotes/WiiU. Really, it's like these guys only think that [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks even for the most arbitrary change, the game automatically sucks]]. Second, putting all GameCube [=GameCube=] games in the same category of awful is a stupid generalization. I never had any interest in the Xbox 360; UsefulNotes/Xbox360; does that mean all Xbox 360 games are terrible because of that? No; it just means I never took an interest in it! I may have merely mentioned this moment because I grew up with a GameCube, [=GameCube=], but even if I wasn't a GameCube [=GameCube=] owner I would be headdesking so hard at this moment.
17th Feb '17 4:54:39 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a small bone to pick with a throwaway line in the WebOriginal/CollegeHumor video, "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNlAZLCGLuU Luigi Finally Snaps]]". The plot of the video involves Luigi [[WhatTheHellHero calling out Mario for basically getting the spotlight while the green plumber always plays second fiddle]]. The video was perfectly fine for the most part, but what [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy really grinds my gears]] is this: Mario mentions he at least had VideoGame/LuigisMansion which Luigi says was terrible. Okay, fine; no problem. I like the game, but I can see why others don't. Then Mario says "Luigi, it's-a UsefulNotes/GameCube; all of those games were terrible]]". [[BigWhat What!?]] And the GameCube hate apparently doesn't stop there; I recall them often repeatedly bashing the system in several videos. Okay, first of all: all GameCube games are terrible? I don't know about you, but I had fond memories of playing my GameCube, and several others did as well. I remember playing the heck out of VideoGame/SuperMarioSunshine, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaThewindWaker, [[VideoGame/SonicAdventure2 Sonic Adventure 2 Battle]], and VideoGame/PaperMarioTheThousandYearDoor. And that's not even going into [[VideoGame/MetroidPrime several other]] [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil6 games that I]] [[VideoGame/StarFoxAssault missed out on]]. In fact, a lot of these "terrible" games have become fan favorites in recent years; heck ''Wind Waker'' got an HD release on the Wii U. Really, it's like these guys only think that [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks even for the most arbitrary change, the game automatically sucks]]. Second, putting all GameCube games in the same category of awful is a stupid generalization. I never had any interest in the Xbox 360; does that mean all Xbox 360 games are terrible because of that? No; it just means I never took an interest in it! I may have merely mentioned this moment because I grew up with a GameCube, but even if I wasn't a GameCube owner I would be headdesking.

to:

* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a small bone to pick with a throwaway line in the WebOriginal/CollegeHumor video, "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNlAZLCGLuU Luigi Finally Snaps]]". The plot of the video involves Luigi [[WhatTheHellHero calling out Mario for basically getting the spotlight while the green plumber always plays second fiddle]]. The video was perfectly fine for the most part, but what [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy really grinds my gears]] is this: Mario mentions he at least had VideoGame/LuigisMansion which Luigi says was terrible. Okay, fine; no problem. I like the game, but I can see why others don't. Then Mario says "Luigi, it's-a UsefulNotes/GameCube; all of those games were terrible]]".terrible". [[BigWhat What!?]] And the GameCube hate apparently doesn't stop there; I recall them often repeatedly bashing the system in several videos. Okay, first of all: all GameCube games are terrible? I don't know about you, but I had fond memories of playing my GameCube, and several others did as well. I remember playing the heck out of VideoGame/SuperMarioSunshine, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaThewindWaker, [[VideoGame/SonicAdventure2 Sonic Adventure 2 Battle]], and VideoGame/PaperMarioTheThousandYearDoor. And that's not even going into [[VideoGame/MetroidPrime several other]] [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil6 games that I]] [[VideoGame/StarFoxAssault missed out on]]. In fact, a lot of these "terrible" games have become fan favorites in recent years; heck ''Wind Waker'' got an HD release on the Wii U. Really, it's like these guys only think that [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks even for the most arbitrary change, the game automatically sucks]]. Second, putting all GameCube games in the same category of awful is a stupid generalization. I never had any interest in the Xbox 360; does that mean all Xbox 360 games are terrible because of that? No; it just means I never took an interest in it! I may have merely mentioned this moment because I grew up with a GameCube, but even if I wasn't a GameCube owner I would be headdesking. headdesking so hard at this moment.
17th Feb '17 4:53:01 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a small bone to pick with a throwaway line in the WebOriginal/CollegeHumor video, "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNlAZLCGLuU Luigi Finally Snaps]]". The plot of the video involves Luigi [[WhatTheHellHero calling out Mario for basically getting the spotlight while the green plumber always plays second fiddle]]. The video was perfectly fine for the most part, but what [[WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy really grinds my gears]] is this: Mario mentions he at least had VideoGame/LuigisMansion which Luigi says was terrible. Okay, fine; no problem. I like the game, but I can see why others don't. Then Mario says "Luigi, it's-a UsefulNotes/GameCube; all of those games were terrible]]". [[BigWhat What!?]] And the GameCube hate apparently doesn't stop there; I recall them often repeatedly bashing the system in several videos. Okay, first of all: all GameCube games are terrible? I don't know about you, but I had fond memories of playing my GameCube, and several others did as well. I remember playing the heck out of VideoGame/SuperMarioSunshine, VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaThewindWaker, [[VideoGame/SonicAdventure2 Sonic Adventure 2 Battle]], and VideoGame/PaperMarioTheThousandYearDoor. And that's not even going into [[VideoGame/MetroidPrime several other]] [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil6 games that I]] [[VideoGame/StarFoxAssault missed out on]]. In fact, a lot of these "terrible" games have become fan favorites in recent years; heck ''Wind Waker'' got an HD release on the Wii U. Really, it's like these guys only think that [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks even for the most arbitrary change, the game automatically sucks]]. Second, putting all GameCube games in the same category of awful is a stupid generalization. I never had any interest in the Xbox 360; does that mean all Xbox 360 games are terrible because of that? No; it just means I never took an interest in it! I may have merely mentioned this moment because I grew up with a GameCube, but even if I wasn't a GameCube owner I would be headdesking.
15th Feb '17 11:22:26 AM CaptainTedium
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/CaptainTedium: I nominate ''Scientifically Accurate WesternAnimation/CatDog'' as the absolute worst of this shit. I was sick of the ''Scientifically Accurate'' series long ago because of all the works of fiction that were shamelessly defiled, but finding out that they did a "Scientifically Accurate" version of ''[=CatDog=]'' while doing a Google Images search on the Nickelodeon series made me just a little bit curious. I instantly regretted watching the video after seeing all the gross and disgusting jokes they made on what would happen in real life if a dog and a cat were surgically grafted together. For one, Cat and Dog were ConjoinedTwins rather than a canine and a feline sewn together, so this abominable video kind of [[ShallowParody misses the point of why Cat and Dog shared a body]]. Second, it really adds nothing new to the table and is just another unwatchable mess of applying RealityEnsues and {{Deconstruction}} to works where the laws of physics and reality weren't very important to begin with. Third, it was a needlessly spiteful and petty TakeThat to have Creator/Nickelodeon appear in the video as Nickel''odious''. Seeing this has made me swear off the ''Scientifically Accurate'' series for good. I shudder to think what they'd do with Mickey Mouse.

to:

* Tropers/CaptainTedium: I nominate ''Scientifically Accurate WesternAnimation/CatDog'' as the absolute worst of this shit. I was sick of the ''Scientifically Accurate'' series long ago because of all the works of fiction that were shamelessly defiled, but finding out that they did a "Scientifically Accurate" version of ''[=CatDog=]'' while doing a Google Images search on the Nickelodeon series made me just a little bit curious. I instantly regretted watching the video after seeing all the gross and disgusting jokes they made on what would happen in real life if a dog and a cat were surgically grafted together. For one, Cat and Dog were ConjoinedTwins rather than a canine and a feline sewn together, so this abominable video kind of [[ShallowParody misses the point of why Cat and Dog shared a body]]. Second, it really adds nothing new to the table and is just another unwatchable mess of applying RealityEnsues and {{Deconstruction}} to works where the laws of physics and reality weren't very important to begin with. Third, it was a needlessly spiteful and petty TakeThat to have Creator/Nickelodeon Creator/{{Nickelodeon}} appear in the video as Nickel''odious''. Seeing this has made me swear off the ''Scientifically Accurate'' series for good. I shudder to think what they'd do with Mickey Mouse.
15th Feb '17 11:20:34 AM CaptainTedium
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/CaptainTedium: I nominate ''Scientifically Accurate WesternAnimation/CatDog'' as the absolute worst of this shit. I was sick of the ''Scientifically Accurate'' series long ago because of all the works of fiction that were shamelessly defiled, but finding out that they did a "Scientifically Accurate" version of ''[=CatDog=]'' while doing a Google Images search on the Nickelodeon series made me just a little bit curious. I instantly regretted watching the video after seeing all the gross and disgusting jokes they made on what would happen in real life if a dog and a cat were surgically grafted together. For one, Cat and Dog were ConjoinedTwins rather than a canine and a feline sewn together, so this abominable video kind of [[ShallowParody misses the point of why Cat and Dog shared a body]]. Second, it really adds nothing new to the table and is just another unwatchable mess of applying RealityEnsues and {{Deconstruction}} to works where the laws of physics and reality weren't very important to begin with. Seeing this has made me swear off the ''Scientifically Accurate'' series for good. I shudder to think what they'd do with Mickey Mouse.

to:

* Tropers/CaptainTedium: I nominate ''Scientifically Accurate WesternAnimation/CatDog'' as the absolute worst of this shit. I was sick of the ''Scientifically Accurate'' series long ago because of all the works of fiction that were shamelessly defiled, but finding out that they did a "Scientifically Accurate" version of ''[=CatDog=]'' while doing a Google Images search on the Nickelodeon series made me just a little bit curious. I instantly regretted watching the video after seeing all the gross and disgusting jokes they made on what would happen in real life if a dog and a cat were surgically grafted together. For one, Cat and Dog were ConjoinedTwins rather than a canine and a feline sewn together, so this abominable video kind of [[ShallowParody misses the point of why Cat and Dog shared a body]]. Second, it really adds nothing new to the table and is just another unwatchable mess of applying RealityEnsues and {{Deconstruction}} to works where the laws of physics and reality weren't very important to begin with. Third, it was a needlessly spiteful and petty TakeThat to have Creator/Nickelodeon appear in the video as Nickel''odious''. Seeing this has made me swear off the ''Scientifically Accurate'' series for good. I shudder to think what they'd do with Mickey Mouse.
14th Feb '17 7:01:53 PM CoCage
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** [=CoCage=]: Max's buddy, Simmons isn't perfect either, a guy known for being a know-it-all and opinionated. In their Super Nintendo stream on twitch (the one with the Power Ranges SNES fighting game), Simmons goes on rant about how people who enjoy ''Anime/KillLaKill'' forces themselves to like it. What's worse he take's Miyazaki's "Anime was a mistake" quote out of context and uses thus as his argument on why the show was bad including low budget animation but high quality fight scenes, and not a good story. The only problem is that this is hypocrisy to its highest degree as many (old) anime that Simmons and his pals enjoy suffer from this. While I prefer most old-school anime similar to them, I won't go out of my way to insult people for liking a decent show. What's funny is all the problems he criticizes for Kill La Kill, the same thing happens in ''Attack on Titan''; an anime he enjoys. ''[=AoT=]'' has all the same problems budget, but on animation (still higher quality compared to Kill La Kill), and a story with interesting premise, but horrible execution. The only difference is Kill La Kill at least had a planned beginning, middle, and end with characters that actually develop, while Attack on Titan suffers the same problems from other long running anime. I call it ''Dragonball Z'', ''Bleach'', or ''One Piece'' syndrome. Simmons if you don't like certain shows or any media in general, that's fine and dandy, but don't act like your opinion is an undisputed fact. This is why I don't watch his solo streams or take most things he's says with a grain of salt.

to:

** [=CoCage=]: Max's buddy, Simmons isn't perfect either, either; a guy known for being a know-it-all and opinionated. In their Super Nintendo stream on twitch (the one with the Power Ranges SNES fighting game), Simmons goes on rant about how people who enjoy ''Anime/KillLaKill'' forces themselves to like it. What's worse he take's Miyazaki's "Anime was a mistake" mistake..." quote out of context and uses thus this as his argument on why the show was bad including low budget animation but high quality fight scenes, and not a good story. The only problem is that this is hypocrisy to its highest degree as many (old) anime that Simmons and his pals enjoy suffer from this. While I prefer most old-school anime similar to them, I won't go out of my way to insult people for liking a decent show. What's funny is all the problems he criticizes for Kill La Kill, the same thing happens in ''Attack on Titan''; an anime he enjoys. ''[=AoT=]'' has all the same problems budget, but problems: cut budget on animation (still higher quality compared to Kill La Kill), except fight scenes, and a story with interesting premise, but horrible execution. The only difference is Kill La Kill at least had a planned beginning, middle, and end with characters that actually develop, while Attack on Titan suffers the same problems from other long running anime. I call it ''Dragonball Z'', ''Bleach'', or ''One Piece'' syndrome. Simmons if you don't like certain shows or any media in general, games, that's fine and dandy, but don't act like your opinion is an undisputed fact. This is why I don't watch his solo streams or take most things he's says with a grain of salt.
14th Feb '17 6:56:25 PM CoCage
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** [=CoCage=]: Max's buddy, Simmons isn't perfect either, a guy known for being a know-it-all and opinionated. In their Super Nintendo stream on twitch (the one with the Power Ranges SNES fighting game), Simmons goes on rant about how people who enjoy ''Anime/KillLaKill'' forces themselves to like it. What's worse he take's Miyazaki's "Anime was a mistake" quote out of context and uses thus as his argument on why the show was bad including low budget animation but high quality fight scenes, and not a good story. The only problem is that this is hypocrisy to its highest degree as many (old) anime that Simmons and his pals enjoy suffer from this. While I prefer most old-school anime similar to them, I won't go out of my way to insult people for liking a decent show. What's funny is all the problems he criticizes for Kill La Kill, the same thing happens in ''Attack on Titan''; an anime he enjoys. ''[=AoT=]'' has all the same problems budget, but on animation (still higher quality compared to Kill La Kill), and a story with interesting premise, but horrible execution. The only difference is Kill La Kill at least had a planned beginning, middle, and end with characters that actually develop, while Attack on Titan suffers the same problems from other long running anime. I call it ''Dragonball Z'', ''Bleach'', or ''One Piece'' syndrome. Simmons if you don't like certain shows or any media in general, that's fine and dandy, but don't act like your opinion is an undisputed fact. This is why I don't watch his solo streams or take most things he's says with a grain of salt.
14th Feb '17 5:28:28 PM FromtheWordsofBR
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even though the bit with his friend Ralphthemoviemaker was decent. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny....this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), and worst of all, it's not funny, not even in the black sort of sense. I know Ralph's bit was produced by himself but there was no need for that joke and it soured the video a bit for me (still a damn good video either way, but good lord) due to how unnecessary and hypocritical it was.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even though the bit with his friend Ralphthemoviemaker was decent.good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny....this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), and worst of all, it's not funny, not even in the black sort of sense. I know Ralph's bit was produced by himself but there was no need for that joke and it soured the video a bit for me (still a damn good video either way, but good lord) due to how unnecessary and hypocritical it was. Also, Ralph avoids using {{Overly Long Gag}}s in his videos for the most part.
13th Feb '17 8:25:16 PM Loekman3
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

* Creators do not have the privilege to remove a moment regarding their own work. It's their own opinion and should be treated as a form of criticism. If they do remove it, please report it and readd the moment back.
13th Feb '17 7:36:20 PM MorphinBrony
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

WARNING: SURPRISINGLY ENOUGH, THIS IS OUR OPINION. DON'T GET YOUR [[DethroningMomentOfSuck MISTAKES]] IN A TWIST.
13th Feb '17 7:15:27 PM MorphinBrony
Is there an issue? Send a Message


From [[CriticalResearchFailure entries that have about as much research in them as the Jimmy McPerson essay]] to jokes that would make Seth McFarlane shake his head, we count down [[DethroningMomentOfSuck the worst Planet Dolan moments of all time]].

to:

From [[CriticalResearchFailure entries that have about as much research in them as the Jimmy McPerson essay]] to jokes that would make Seth McFarlane Creator/SethMacFarlane shake his head, we count down [[DethroningMomentOfSuck the worst Planet Dolan moments of all time]].
13th Feb '17 3:01:20 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Sugarp1e1: PhantomStrider (real name: Josh Strider) is a CausticCritic from Australia who is often described as a less angry, more forgiving [[TheMysteriousMrEnter Mysterious Mr. Enter]] with better editing. Unlike most [[CausticCritic Caustic Critics]] however, he does almost all of his reviews in the form of lists. He's also pretty humble, admitting to being biased at times and making it clear in all of the intros to his videos that he's not a FanHater (As you can see in the flavor text). But the former didn't become more blatantly obvious than in his [[https://youtu.be/-0MxCQmlmmE Top 10 Worst Cartoon Remakes list]]. It was pretty good for the most part. There's just three things I didn't like and/or understand. 1) I'm confused as to how the [[spoiler:Powerpuff Girls]] reboot wasn't at #10 considering he was the least critical of it compared to the others on the list. 2) I didn't really understand the TakeThat against the trailer for the new Ghostbusters movie. I know that the all-female cast didn't get a very warm welcome, but if there's one thing I know, it's that [[NeverTrustATrailer trailers can't be trusted]]. You don't know if the movie gonna be good regardless of the cast or not. But the DMoS for me is his #1 pick: [[spoiler:every single Franchise/ScoobyDoo remake in existence]]! Look, I don't care if he doesn't like [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]]; that's his opinion. But his reason behind his #1 pick shows just how biased he can be. Strider's criticisms about [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] are legitimate, if debatable (he found the show formulaic, boring and "nothing special"), but his only criticism about all of the remakes that followed was basically "The original was never any good to begin with, so the franchise should have died years ago!" In his defense, if I remember correctly, I think he did mention at some point that he doesn't feel like any of the remakes added anything new or interesting to the series. But even if he did, it was completely overshadowed by his rant about how annoyed he is that the franchise is still going after 40 years despite the original's lack of appeal to him. I totally understand where he's coming from; I get pretty surprised myself when I find out something that came out when I was a kid is still going on to this day, especially if it's a show I don't like. But I wouldn't be so annoyed as to place the entire franchise at #1 on a Worst Remakes list and bash it simply because of it's lifespan and the quality of the original alone. Not to mention that he seems to think that [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] is, like the other remakes he mentions, exactly the same as the original. Oh, and Strider seemed to had [[TookALevelInJerkass taken a level in jerkass]] for this entry. Usually, he just expresses his distaste in a professional and witty manner like the classy DeadpanSnarker he is. Here it sounds more like he's trying to rally all of his viewers against the franchise, what with him having the gall to assume that nobody actively watches [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] anyway, asking "Has any kid ever sat down and said, 'Oh, look! [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] is on!'?", and claiming that kids only watch it when there's nothing better to watch. Excuse me Strider, but I watched both [[spoiler: What's New, Scooby-Doo?]] and [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] regularly when I was a kid and loved them. Again, this is coming from a guy who claims to be fine with people liking something he doesn't. This assumption is not only hypocritical and insulting, it makes no sense. If a series has been remade over 19 times, then it must have some sort of fanbase otherwise it wouldn't have been remade even once! Even worse? In his [[https://youtu.be/IlkvxV1laO8 Top 10 Best Disney Movies list]], he references the angry comments he got from this in a gag where he calmly says "[[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] kinda... sucks?" before being pelted by tomatoes. As if he was being totally reasonable with his decision and the viewers were the ones being ridiculous! Can someone please remind him that he specifically described his #2 pick, [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], as "the devil's anus of bad"? If he thinks [[spoiler:the entire Scooby-Doo franchise]] is even worse than [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], then "it kinda sucks" isn't even close to what he was saying. Not only that, but judging by Strider's comment about [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/N95f7baE0as?list=PLfji1gVKy4fYaePq-q1ox2S24X8VZbelZ Top 10 Worst Cartoon Live Action Remakes list]], he seems to think that the only people who are mad at him for this are the [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] fans. Implying that he genuinely believes that all of those angry comments were from the FanDumb as opposed to some belonging to those who saw just how biased he was being. I was so disappointed with him, I couldn't bring myself to listen to him re-explain why he hates [[spoiler:Scooby Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/P9NLefklYK8 Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes list]] and skipped over it. (But judging by his added comment of "Forever" in the entry title, he was trying to justify cramming the entire franchise on the top spot of his Worst Remakes list). I don't believe in Unsubscribing, so I'll continue to watch his videos. But you'd think somebody who claims to enjoy engaging in intelligent conversation would have a better reason for his #1 pick than "there's too many remakes".

to:

* Sugarp1e1: PhantomStrider (real name: Josh Strider) is a CausticCritic from Australia who is often described as a less angry, more forgiving [[TheMysteriousMrEnter Mysterious Mr. Enter]] with better editing. Unlike most [[CausticCritic Caustic Critics]] however, he does almost all of his reviews in the form of lists. He's also pretty humble, admitting to being biased at times and making it clear in all of the intros to his videos that he's not a FanHater (As you can see in the flavor text). But the former didn't become more blatantly obvious than in his [[https://youtu.be/-0MxCQmlmmE Top 10 Worst Cartoon Remakes list]]. It was pretty good for the most part. There's just three things I didn't like and/or understand. 1) I'm confused as to how the [[spoiler:Powerpuff Girls]] reboot wasn't at #10 considering he was the least critical of it compared to the others on the list. 2) I didn't really understand the TakeThat against the trailer for the new Ghostbusters movie. I know that the all-female cast didn't get a very warm welcome, but if there's one thing I know, it's that [[NeverTrustATrailer trailers can't be trusted]]. You don't know if the movie gonna be good regardless of the cast or not. But the DMoS for me is his #1 pick: [[spoiler:every single Franchise/ScoobyDoo remake in existence]]! Look, I don't care if he doesn't like [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]]; that's his opinion. But his reason behind his #1 pick shows just how biased he can be. Strider's criticisms about [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] are legitimate, if debatable (he found the show formulaic, boring and "nothing special"), but his only criticism about all of the remakes that followed was basically "The original was never any good to begin with, so the franchise should have died years ago!" In his defense, if I remember correctly, I think he did mention at some point that he doesn't feel like any of the remakes added anything new or interesting to the series. But even if he did, it was completely overshadowed by his rant about how annoyed he is that the franchise is still going after 40 years despite the original's lack of appeal to him. I totally understand where he's coming from; I get pretty surprised myself when I find out something that came out when I was a kid is still going on to this day, especially if it's a show I don't like. But I wouldn't be so annoyed as to place the entire franchise at #1 on a Worst Remakes list and bash it simply because of it's lifespan and the quality of the original alone. Not to mention that he seems to think that [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] is, like the other remakes he mentions, exactly the same as the original. Oh, and Strider seemed to had have [[TookALevelInJerkass taken a level in jerkass]] for this entry. Usually, he just expresses his distaste in a professional and witty manner like the classy DeadpanSnarker he is. Here it sounds more like he's trying to rally all of his viewers against the franchise, what with him having the gall to assume that nobody actively watches [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] anyway, asking "Has any kid ever sat down and said, 'Oh, look! [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] is on!'?", and claiming that kids only watch it when there's nothing better to watch. Excuse me Strider, but I watched both [[spoiler: What's New, Scooby-Doo?]] and [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] regularly when I was a kid and loved them. Again, this is coming from a guy who claims to be fine with people liking something he doesn't. This assumption is not only hypocritical and insulting, it makes no sense. If a series has been remade over 19 times, then it must have some sort of fanbase otherwise it wouldn't have been remade even once! Even worse? In his [[https://youtu.be/IlkvxV1laO8 Top 10 Best Disney Movies list]], he references the angry comments he got from this in a gag where he calmly says "[[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] kinda... sucks?" before being pelted by tomatoes. As if he was being totally reasonable with his decision and the viewers were the ones being ridiculous! Can someone please remind him that he specifically described his #2 pick, [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], as "the devil's anus of bad"? If he thinks [[spoiler:the entire Scooby-Doo franchise]] is even worse than [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], then "it kinda sucks" isn't even close to what he was saying. Not only that, but judging by Strider's comment about [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/N95f7baE0as?list=PLfji1gVKy4fYaePq-q1ox2S24X8VZbelZ Top 10 Worst Cartoon Live Action Remakes list]], he seems to think that the only people who are mad at him for this are the [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] fans. Implying that he genuinely believes that all of those angry comments were from the FanDumb as opposed to some belonging to those who saw just how biased he was being. I was so disappointed with him, I couldn't bring myself to listen to him re-explain why he hates [[spoiler:Scooby Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/P9NLefklYK8 Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes list]] and skipped over it. (But judging by his added comment of "Forever" in the entry title, he was trying to justify cramming the entire franchise on the top spot of his Worst Remakes list). I don't believe in Unsubscribing, so I'll continue to watch his videos. But you'd think somebody who claims to enjoy engaging in intelligent conversation would have a better reason for his #1 pick than "there's too many remakes".
13th Feb '17 3:00:20 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Sugarp1e1: PhantomStrider (real name: Josh Strider) is a CausticCritic from Australia who is often described as a less angry, more forgiving [[TheMysteriousMrEnter Mysterious Mr. Enter]] with better editing. Unlike most [[CausticCritic Caustic Critics]] however, he does almost all of his reviews in the form of lists. He's also pretty humble, admitting to being biased at times and making it clear in all of the intros to his videos that he's not a FanHater (As you can see in the flavor text). But the former didn't become more blatantly obvious than in his [[https://youtu.be/-0MxCQmlmmE Top 10 Worst Cartoon Remakes list]]. It was pretty good for the most part. There's just three things I didn't like and/or understand. 1) I'm confused as to how the [[spoiler:Powerpuff Girls]] reboot wasn't at #10 considering he was the least critical of it compared to the others on the list. 2) I didn't really understand the TakeThat against the trailer for the new Ghostbusters movie. I know that the all-female cast didn't get a very warm welcome, but if there's one thing I know, it's that [[NeverTrustATrailer trailers can't be trusted]]. You don't know if the movie gonna be good regardless of the cast or not. But the DMoS for me is his #1 pick: [[spoiler:every single Franchise/ScoobyDoo remake in existence]]! Look, I don't care if he doesn't like [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]]; that's his opinion. But his reason behind his #1 pick shows just how biased he can be. Strider's criticisms about [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] are legitimate, if debatable (he found the show formulaic, boring and "nothing special"), but his only criticism about all of the remakes that followed was basically "The original was never any good to begin with, so the franchise should have died years ago!" In his defense, if I remember correctly, I think he did mention at some point that he doesn't feel like any of the remakes added anything new or interesting to the series. But even if he did, it was completely overshadowed by his rant about how annoyed he is that the franchise is still going after 40 years despite the original's lack of appeal to him. I totally understand where he's coming from; I get pretty surprised myself when I find out something that came out when I was a kid is still going on to this day, especially if it's a show I don't like. But I wouldn't be so annoyed as to place the entire franchise at #1 on a Worst Remakes list and bash it simply because of it's lifespan and the quality of the original alone. Not to mention that he seems to think that [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] is, like the other remakes he mentions, exactly the same as the original. Oh, and Strider seemed to had TakenALevelInJerkass for this entry. Usually, he just expresses his distaste in a professional and witty manner like the classy DeadpanSnarker he is. Here it sounds more like he's trying to rally all of his viewers against the franchise, what with him having the gall to assume that nobody actively watches [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] anyway, asking "Has any kid ever sat down and said, 'Oh, look! [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] is on!'?", and claiming that kids only watch it when there's nothing better to watch. Excuse me Strider, but I watched both [[spoiler: What's New, Scooby-Doo?]] and [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] regularly when I was a kid and loved them. Again, this is coming from a guy who claims to be fine with people liking something he doesn't. This assumption is not only hypocritical and insulting, it makes no sense. If a series has been remade over 19 times, then it must have some sort of fanbase otherwise it wouldn't have been remade even once! Even worse? In his [[https://youtu.be/IlkvxV1laO8 Top 10 Best Disney Movies list]], he references the angry comments he got from this in a gag where he calmly says "[[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] kinda... sucks?" before being pelted by tomatoes. As if he was being totally reasonable with his decision and the viewers were the ones being ridiculous! Can someone please remind him that he specifically described his #2 pick, [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], as "the devil's anus of bad"? If he thinks [[spoiler:the entire Scooby-Doo franchise]] is even worse than [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], then "it kinda sucks" isn't even close to what he was saying. Not only that, but judging by Strider's comment about [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/N95f7baE0as?list=PLfji1gVKy4fYaePq-q1ox2S24X8VZbelZ Top 10 Worst Cartoon Live Action Remakes list]], he seems to think that the only people who are mad at him for this are the [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] fans. Implying that he genuinely believes that all of those angry comments were from the FanDumb as opposed to some belonging to those who saw just how biased he was being. I was so disappointed with him, I couldn't bring myself to listen to him re-explain why he hates [[spoiler:Scooby Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/P9NLefklYK8 Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes list]] and skipped over it. (But judging by his added comment of "Forever" in the entry title, he was trying to justify cramming the entire franchise on the top spot of his Worst Remakes list). I don't believe in Unsubscribing, so I'll continue to watch his videos. But you'd think somebody who claims to enjoy engaging in intelligent conversation would have a better reason for his #1 pick than "there's too many remakes".

to:

* Sugarp1e1: PhantomStrider (real name: Josh Strider) is a CausticCritic from Australia who is often described as a less angry, more forgiving [[TheMysteriousMrEnter Mysterious Mr. Enter]] with better editing. Unlike most [[CausticCritic Caustic Critics]] however, he does almost all of his reviews in the form of lists. He's also pretty humble, admitting to being biased at times and making it clear in all of the intros to his videos that he's not a FanHater (As you can see in the flavor text). But the former didn't become more blatantly obvious than in his [[https://youtu.be/-0MxCQmlmmE Top 10 Worst Cartoon Remakes list]]. It was pretty good for the most part. There's just three things I didn't like and/or understand. 1) I'm confused as to how the [[spoiler:Powerpuff Girls]] reboot wasn't at #10 considering he was the least critical of it compared to the others on the list. 2) I didn't really understand the TakeThat against the trailer for the new Ghostbusters movie. I know that the all-female cast didn't get a very warm welcome, but if there's one thing I know, it's that [[NeverTrustATrailer trailers can't be trusted]]. You don't know if the movie gonna be good regardless of the cast or not. But the DMoS for me is his #1 pick: [[spoiler:every single Franchise/ScoobyDoo remake in existence]]! Look, I don't care if he doesn't like [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]]; that's his opinion. But his reason behind his #1 pick shows just how biased he can be. Strider's criticisms about [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] are legitimate, if debatable (he found the show formulaic, boring and "nothing special"), but his only criticism about all of the remakes that followed was basically "The original was never any good to begin with, so the franchise should have died years ago!" In his defense, if I remember correctly, I think he did mention at some point that he doesn't feel like any of the remakes added anything new or interesting to the series. But even if he did, it was completely overshadowed by his rant about how annoyed he is that the franchise is still going after 40 years despite the original's lack of appeal to him. I totally understand where he's coming from; I get pretty surprised myself when I find out something that came out when I was a kid is still going on to this day, especially if it's a show I don't like. But I wouldn't be so annoyed as to place the entire franchise at #1 on a Worst Remakes list and bash it simply because of it's lifespan and the quality of the original alone. Not to mention that he seems to think that [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] is, like the other remakes he mentions, exactly the same as the original. Oh, and Strider seemed to had TakenALevelInJerkass [[TookALevelInJerkass taken a level in jerkass]] for this entry. Usually, he just expresses his distaste in a professional and witty manner like the classy DeadpanSnarker he is. Here it sounds more like he's trying to rally all of his viewers against the franchise, what with him having the gall to assume that nobody actively watches [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] anyway, asking "Has any kid ever sat down and said, 'Oh, look! [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] is on!'?", and claiming that kids only watch it when there's nothing better to watch. Excuse me Strider, but I watched both [[spoiler: What's New, Scooby-Doo?]] and [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] regularly when I was a kid and loved them. Again, this is coming from a guy who claims to be fine with people liking something he doesn't. This assumption is not only hypocritical and insulting, it makes no sense. If a series has been remade over 19 times, then it must have some sort of fanbase otherwise it wouldn't have been remade even once! Even worse? In his [[https://youtu.be/IlkvxV1laO8 Top 10 Best Disney Movies list]], he references the angry comments he got from this in a gag where he calmly says "[[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] kinda... sucks?" before being pelted by tomatoes. As if he was being totally reasonable with his decision and the viewers were the ones being ridiculous! Can someone please remind him that he specifically described his #2 pick, [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], as "the devil's anus of bad"? If he thinks [[spoiler:the entire Scooby-Doo franchise]] is even worse than [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]], then "it kinda sucks" isn't even close to what he was saying. Not only that, but judging by Strider's comment about [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/N95f7baE0as?list=PLfji1gVKy4fYaePq-q1ox2S24X8VZbelZ Top 10 Worst Cartoon Live Action Remakes list]], he seems to think that the only people who are mad at him for this are the [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] fans. Implying that he genuinely believes that all of those angry comments were from the FanDumb as opposed to some belonging to those who saw just how biased he was being. I was so disappointed with him, I couldn't bring myself to listen to him re-explain why he hates [[spoiler:Scooby Doo]] in his [[https://youtu.be/P9NLefklYK8 Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes list]] and skipped over it. (But judging by his added comment of "Forever" in the entry title, he was trying to justify cramming the entire franchise on the top spot of his Worst Remakes list). I don't believe in Unsubscribing, so I'll continue to watch his videos. But you'd think somebody who claims to enjoy engaging in intelligent conversation would have a better reason for his #1 pick than "there's too many remakes".
13th Feb '17 1:39:32 PM TheFarmboy
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** SCPIhpkmn: I have far less kind things to say about Jontron. On a recent live stream (recent as of mid-February 2017), he went off on a political tirade about... well, let's just say that it was rather offensive and leave it at that. I find it impossible to enjoy his work now that I know that he's a close-minded jackoff, and this is a perfect example of why content creators shouldn't let their politics mix with their work. Not helping matters is the fact that most of the comments sections on his videos are now filled with support from groups that are... exercising the RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement here... better suited to Jackson, Mississippi circa the 1960s than the modern zeitgeist. TL;DR: Fuck off, Jontron.
12th Feb '17 11:55:24 PM vexer
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[/folder]

to:

[[/folder]
[[/folder]]
12th Feb '17 11:54:02 PM vexer
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

[[/folder]
12th Feb '17 11:52:14 PM vexer
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Extra Credits]]
* Vexer Normally I love the EC guys, but sometimes they can really go off the deep end(I.E. their videos about "Hatred" and "Call of Juarez: The Cartel"), but by far their absolute worst episode bar none would have to be "The Division: Problematic Meaning in Mechanics" which is the worst case of CriticalResearchFailure and PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad that i've ever seen. It's abundantly clear that the EC guys only played the game for a couple of hours, as they claim the game is about gunning down innocent civilians, which is a blatant lie as all the NPCs you have to kill are hostile to you from the start and all belong to violent gangs which kill and terrorize innocent people. They also assume that the game is "racist" cause the enemies wear hoodies, they apparently did not take into consideration that the game was made by a Swedish developer, so it's very likely they did not realize that people would misinterpret it. The EC guys also painfully try and make a case about how the game is supporting Totalitarianism, which it clearly is not since society itself has collapsed, also their points about being "judge jury and executioner" fall flat considering New York is under martial law, which means due process is suspended. I could go on and on about how many errors that video has, but my overall point is that the EC guys were letting emotion overtake logic and completely failing to do any actual research on the game itself, and in the past EC were good about responding to criticism from people about their videos, but not anymore it seems, as they never apologized for the inaccuracies in this video or the ones in the "Cartel" and "Hatred" episodes.
12th Feb '17 5:12:33 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** SenorCornholio: I second that, though I'm a little more critical on this video. I have more problems in mind, such as calling WesternAnimation/ExtremeGhostbusters a remake when it's a continuation of the original WesternAnimation/TheRealGhostbusters with clear ties to its predecessor, and WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog actually being considered a remake for this list despite being the first Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog cartoon ever aired (and though I do appreciate him not blindly bashing WesternAnimation/SonicUnderground like most tend to do, it sadly qualifies more than AoSTH for this list due to having similarities to WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM and [[ComicBook/ArchieComicsSonicTheHedgehog the comics]], the former of which was heavily anticipated for a comeback after its SequelHook). And apparently, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViPq-aJKB0c I am not alone]] [[https://youtu.be/JvXKtIpkbuw in thinking this]]. Aside from that, most of the other entries were understandable, then the [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] entry comes up and my eyes light up in confusion for all the reasons listed above. Even as a person who also isn't the biggest fan of [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]], I can say this was a dumb choice. RebelTaxi might have also put the entire franchise on his list of worst remakes because he also wanted it to just die already, but at least he didn't put it at numero freaking uno (Plus, it was PlayedForLaughs). Seriously, to put this over the likes of [[spoiler: TeenTitansGo]] and [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]] is mind-boggling to say the least, since [[spoiler: TTG]] at its worst actually goes out of its way to insult its own critics and [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]] was one of the most 90's-pandering shows of all time. Not even the [[DorkAge worst of]] [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] is that bad; at worst it gets stale and repetitive like he says, which would be a good reason to put at least some entries in the franchise on this list, but nowhere near #1. What's more is that he barely mentions most of them aside from the infamous terror of [[spoiler: Shaggy and Scooby-Doo Get a Clue]] and the divisive series that is [[spoiler: Be Cool, Scooby-Doo]] as if he hardly saw any of the other shows. I'd have appreciated it if he said "not all of these are bad, mind you, but the majority tend to be mediocre at best", but he didn't; instead he goes through a long laundry list of "remakes" that aren't even listed in how bad they are. So now, we have to assume that he blindly hates [[spoiler: the earlier direct to video movies]] and [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo: Mystery Incorporated]], which are considered silver linings in the franchise; also very easy to do as [[spoiler: Mystery Incorporated]] was included in the rundown (quick update: as of his "Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes" list, he has watched [[spoiler:Mystery Inc.]] and found it refreshing; strike off for that one). I do like PhantomStrider's videos most of the time, but this was quite the big stinker for him. And I sincerely pray it does not occur again.

to:

** SenorCornholio: I second that, though I'm a little more critical on this video. I have more problems in mind, such as calling WesternAnimation/ExtremeGhostbusters a remake when it's a continuation of the original WesternAnimation/TheRealGhostbusters with clear ties to its predecessor, and WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog actually being considered a remake for this list despite being the first Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog cartoon ever aired (and though I do appreciate him not blindly bashing WesternAnimation/SonicUnderground like most tend to do, it sadly qualifies more than AoSTH [=AoSTH=] for this list due to having similarities to WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM and [[ComicBook/ArchieComicsSonicTheHedgehog the comics]], the former of which was heavily anticipated for a comeback after its SequelHook). And apparently, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViPq-aJKB0c I am not alone]] [[https://youtu.be/JvXKtIpkbuw in thinking this]]. Aside from that, most of the other entries were understandable, then the [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] entry comes up and my eyes light up in confusion for all the reasons listed above. Even as a person who also isn't the biggest fan of [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]], I can say this was a dumb choice. RebelTaxi might have also put the entire franchise on his list of worst remakes because he also wanted it to just die already, but at least he didn't put it at numero freaking uno (Plus, it was PlayedForLaughs). Seriously, to put this over the likes of [[spoiler: TeenTitansGo]] and [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]] is mind-boggling to say the least, since [[spoiler: TTG]] at its worst actually goes out of its way to insult its own critics and [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]] was one of the most 90's-pandering shows of all time. Not even the [[DorkAge worst of]] [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] is that bad; at worst it gets stale and repetitive like he says, which would be a good reason to put at least some entries in the franchise on this list, but nowhere near #1. What's more is that he barely mentions most of them aside from the infamous terror of [[spoiler: Shaggy and Scooby-Doo Get a Clue]] and the divisive series that is [[spoiler: Be Cool, Scooby-Doo]] as if he hardly saw any of the other shows. I'd have appreciated it if he said "not all of these are bad, mind you, but the majority tend to be mediocre at best", but he didn't; instead he goes through a long laundry list of "remakes" that aren't even listed in how bad they are. So now, we have to assume that he blindly hates [[spoiler: the earlier direct to video movies]] and [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo: Mystery Incorporated]], which are considered silver linings in the franchise; also very easy to do as [[spoiler: Mystery Incorporated]] was included in the rundown (quick update: as of his "Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes" list, he has watched [[spoiler:Mystery Inc.]] and found it refreshing; strike off for that one). I do like PhantomStrider's videos most of the time, but this was quite the big stinker for him. And I sincerely pray it does not occur again.
12th Feb '17 5:11:40 PM SenorCornholio
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** SenorCornholio: I have recently warmed up to Racist Mario due to the voice clips being used in some of [[Machinima/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers SMG4's videos]], but that doesn't change the fact that overall, this video is heavily flawed in more ways than one. I could go on about the unfunny jokes, the nonsensical plot, etc, but what I think makes the whole thing fall apart: the premise. Mario goes insane and starts killing everyone because of all the third-party characters in the current race. Why does this not work? Well firstly, because there has never been a third-party character in a main Mario Kart title. The DLC characters for Mario Kart 8 were all from other Nintendo franchises, and therefore first-party. Secondly, the characters themselves; [[VideoGame/SegaSuperstars Sonic may have been playable in several Sega-themed sports and racing titles]], but the only time he crossed over with Nintendo itself was in VideoGame/SuperSmashBros. And even then, Knuckles wasn't even playable so that's out. It's like some of these franchises were listed all because of their racing titles, [[Franchise/StarWars Anakin]] and [[VideoGame/CrashBandicoot Crash's head]] also being standout examples. Thirdly, speaking of Sony, was there an alternate universe I'm not aware of where Sony and Nintendo crossed over and [[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet Sackboy]] and [[VideoGame/GodOfWar Kratos]] were put into karts? I'll admit that Kratos driving a tiny kart is a funny sight, but what's the point? Ironically, there's one crossover that I doubt Flashgitz even knows he got right, and that's Pac-Man's head on a spear, since he was playable in the Arcade GP games developed by Namco-Bandai. Other than that, the rest of the references are shallow at best and make absolutely no sense at worst. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go watch [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKRJt4CDMY the version where all the violence is replaced with The Nutshack]]. It's somehow way better.

to:

** SenorCornholio: I have recently warmed up to Racist Mario due to the voice clips being used in some of [[Machinima/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers SMG4's videos]], but that doesn't change the fact that overall, this video is heavily flawed in more ways than one. I could go on about the unfunny jokes, the nonsensical plot, etc, but what I think makes the whole thing fall apart: the premise. Mario goes insane and starts killing everyone because of all the third-party characters in the current race. Why does this not work? Well firstly, because there has never been a third-party character in a main Mario Kart title. The DLC characters for Mario Kart 8 were all from other Nintendo franchises, and therefore first-party. Secondly, the characters themselves; [[VideoGame/SegaSuperstars Sonic may have been playable in several Sega-themed sports and racing titles]], but the only time he crossed over with Nintendo itself was in VideoGame/SuperSmashBros. And even then, Knuckles wasn't even playable so that's out. It's like some of these franchises were listed all because of their racing titles, with [[Franchise/StarWars Anakin]] and [[VideoGame/CrashBandicoot Crash's head]] also being standout examples. Thirdly, speaking of Sony, was there an alternate universe I'm not aware of where Sony and Nintendo crossed over and [[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet Sackboy]] and [[VideoGame/GodOfWar Kratos]] were put into karts? I'll admit that Kratos driving a tiny kart is a funny sight, but what's the point? Ironically, there's one crossover that I doubt Flashgitz even knows he got right, and that's Pac-Man's head on a spear, since he was playable in the Arcade GP games developed by Namco-Bandai. Other than that, the rest of the references are shallow at best and make absolutely no sense at worst. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go watch [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKRJt4CDMY the version where all the violence is replaced with The Nutshack]]. It's somehow way better.



** SenorCornholio: I second that, though I'm a little more critical on this video. I have more problems in mind, such as WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog actually being considered a remake for this list despite being the first Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog cartoon ever aired (though I do appreciate him not blindly bashing WesternAnimation/SonicUnderground like most tend to do), and calling WesternAnimation/ExtremeGhostbusters a remake when it's a continuation of the original WesternAnimation/TheRealGhostbusters with clear ties to its predecessor. And apparently, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViPq-aJKB0c I am not alone]] [[https://youtu.be/JvXKtIpkbuw in thinking this]]. Aside from that, most of the other entries were understandable, then the [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] entry comes up and my eyes light up in confusion for all the reasons listed above. Even as a person who also isn't the biggest fan of [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]], I can say this was a dumb choice. RebelTaxi might have also put the entire franchise on his list of worst remakes because he also wanted it to just die already, but at least he didn't put it at numero freaking uno (Plus, it was PlayedForLaughs). Seriously, to put this over the likes of [[spoiler: TeenTitansGo]] and [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]] is mind-boggling to say the least, since [[spoiler: TTG]] at its worst actually goes out of its way to insult its own critics and [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]] was one of the most 90's-pandering shows of all time. Not even the [[DorkAge worst of]] [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] is that bad; at worst it gets stale and repetitive like he says, which would be a good reason to put at least some entries in the franchise on this list, but nowhere near #1. What's more is that he barely mentions most of them aside from the infamous terror of [[spoiler: Shaggy and Scooby-Doo Get a Clue]] and the divisive series that is [[spoiler: Be Cool, Scooby-Doo]] as if he hardly saw any of the other shows. I'd have appreciated it if he said "not all of these are bad, mind you, but the majority tend to be mediocre at best", but he didn't; instead he goes through a long laundry list of "remakes" that aren't even listed in how bad they are. So now, we have to assume that he blindly hates [[spoiler: the earlier direct to video movies]] and [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo: Mystery Incorporated]], which are considered silver linings in the franchise; also very easy to do as [[spoiler: Mystery Incorporated]] was included in the rundown (quick update: as of his "Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes" list, he has watched [[spoiler:Mystery Inc.]] and found it refreshing; strike off for that one). I do like PhantomStrider's videos most of the time, but this was quite the big stinker for him. And I sincerely pray it does not occur again.

to:

** SenorCornholio: I second that, though I'm a little more critical on this video. I have more problems in mind, such as calling WesternAnimation/ExtremeGhostbusters a remake when it's a continuation of the original WesternAnimation/TheRealGhostbusters with clear ties to its predecessor, and WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog actually being considered a remake for this list despite being the first Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog cartoon ever aired (though (and though I do appreciate him not blindly bashing WesternAnimation/SonicUnderground like most tend to do), do, it sadly qualifies more than AoSTH for this list due to having similarities to WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM and calling WesternAnimation/ExtremeGhostbusters a remake when it's a continuation of [[ComicBook/ArchieComicsSonicTheHedgehog the original WesternAnimation/TheRealGhostbusters with clear ties to comics]], the former of which was heavily anticipated for a comeback after its predecessor.SequelHook). And apparently, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViPq-aJKB0c I am not alone]] [[https://youtu.be/JvXKtIpkbuw in thinking this]]. Aside from that, most of the other entries were understandable, then the [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] entry comes up and my eyes light up in confusion for all the reasons listed above. Even as a person who also isn't the biggest fan of [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]], I can say this was a dumb choice. RebelTaxi might have also put the entire franchise on his list of worst remakes because he also wanted it to just die already, but at least he didn't put it at numero freaking uno (Plus, it was PlayedForLaughs). Seriously, to put this over the likes of [[spoiler: TeenTitansGo]] and [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]] is mind-boggling to say the least, since [[spoiler: TTG]] at its worst actually goes out of its way to insult its own critics and [[spoiler: Yo Yogi]] was one of the most 90's-pandering shows of all time. Not even the [[DorkAge worst of]] [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo]] is that bad; at worst it gets stale and repetitive like he says, which would be a good reason to put at least some entries in the franchise on this list, but nowhere near #1. What's more is that he barely mentions most of them aside from the infamous terror of [[spoiler: Shaggy and Scooby-Doo Get a Clue]] and the divisive series that is [[spoiler: Be Cool, Scooby-Doo]] as if he hardly saw any of the other shows. I'd have appreciated it if he said "not all of these are bad, mind you, but the majority tend to be mediocre at best", but he didn't; instead he goes through a long laundry list of "remakes" that aren't even listed in how bad they are. So now, we have to assume that he blindly hates [[spoiler: the earlier direct to video movies]] and [[spoiler: Scooby-Doo: Mystery Incorporated]], which are considered silver linings in the franchise; also very easy to do as [[spoiler: Mystery Incorporated]] was included in the rundown (quick update: as of his "Top 5 Cartoons I hate that Everyone Likes" list, he has watched [[spoiler:Mystery Inc.]] and found it refreshing; strike off for that one). I do like PhantomStrider's videos most of the time, but this was quite the big stinker for him. And I sincerely pray it does not occur again.
12th Feb '17 2:27:12 PM Wyldchyld
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/{{Jonn}}: ''anachronauts'' arc 3, fs03. The female elf Nel was rescued by and fell in love with space-girl Una, [[IncompatibleOrientation who is straight]]. Okay, plenty of healthy relationships have grown out of a RescueRomance. She doesn't tell her. Okay, that's reasonable. Nel [[http://xkcd.com/513/ decides to devote her life to being Una's best friend]]. [[UnfortunateImplications Um, what?]] Nel never gets any significant characterization, background, or personality traits other than being in love with Una. [[SatelliteLoveInterest Hmm]]. [[spoiler:Nel is tempted by a genie to kill one of the other Anachronauts in order to have Una. She refuses, saying that she'd rather have Una naturally. You go, girl. And then in fs03, Una gets her hands on the sense-recording earrings Nel has been wearing since the beginning of the arc, and is able to effectively be Nel as she talked to the Genie, including her declaration of love. She re-evaluates her interactions with Nel, and then instantly realizes she loves her. Please note that Una has been exclusively heterosexual up to this point, and realizing she likes girls in general and loves Nel in particular is portrayed as [[SuddenlySexuality basically flipping a switch]]. Oh, and the author pretty clearly [[AuthorAppeal has a fetish for lesbians]], as it popped up in his earlier ''SailorNothing'', and in an aside in arc 2. Their friendship is written as exactly that; a friendship, with no romantic or sexual tension. Compared to the other romances in the series, which are written much more organically, it seems more like a StrangledByTheRedString RomanticPlotTumor than an actual romance. Nel and Una are given some "private time" at the end of that chapter, which would be ideal for showing their conversation before the inevitable sex and underlining the fact that they actually do have feelings for each other, except we never get to see it.]] Did I mention that there had been no other significant LGBT characters in the series up to that point? Yes, that's right, the only known homosexual is there for solely for the purpose of FetishFuel. It's kinda creepy, and I couldn't read the series after that.

to:

* Tropers/{{Jonn}}: ''anachronauts'' arc 3, fs03. The female elf Nel was rescued by and fell in love with space-girl Una, [[IncompatibleOrientation who is straight]]. Okay, plenty of healthy relationships have grown out of a RescueRomance. She doesn't tell her. Okay, that's reasonable. Nel [[http://xkcd.com/513/ decides to devote her life to being Una's best friend]]. [[UnfortunateImplications Um, what?]] Nel never gets any significant characterization, background, or personality traits other than being in love with Una. [[SatelliteLoveInterest Hmm]]. [[spoiler:Nel is tempted by a genie to kill one of the other Anachronauts in order to have Una. She refuses, saying that she'd rather have Una naturally. You go, girl. And then in fs03, Una gets her hands on the sense-recording earrings Nel has been wearing since the beginning of the arc, and is able to effectively be Nel as she talked to the Genie, including her declaration of love. She re-evaluates her interactions with Nel, and then instantly realizes she loves her. Please note that Una has been exclusively heterosexual up to this point, and realizing she likes girls in general and loves Nel in particular is portrayed as [[SuddenlySexuality basically flipping a switch]]. Oh, and the author pretty clearly [[AuthorAppeal has a fetish for lesbians]], as it popped up in his earlier ''SailorNothing'', and in an aside in arc 2. Their friendship is written as exactly that; a friendship, with no romantic or sexual tension. Compared to the other romances in the series, which are written much more organically, it seems more like a StrangledByTheRedString RomanticPlotTumor than an actual romance. Nel and Una are given some "private time" at the end of that chapter, which would be ideal for showing their conversation before the inevitable sex and underlining the fact that they actually do have feelings for each other, except we never get to see it.]] Did I mention that there had been no other significant LGBT characters in the series up to that point? Yes, that's right, the only known homosexual is there for solely for the purpose of FetishFuel.catering to {{fetish}}es. It's kinda creepy, and I couldn't read the series after that.
12th Feb '17 1:20:32 AM SCPIhpkmn
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** SCPIhpkmn: I have far less kind things to say about Jontron. On a recent live stream (recent as of mid-February 2017), he went off on a political tirade about... well, let's just say that it was rather offensive and leave it at that. I find it impossible to enjoy his work now that I know that he's a close-minded jackoff, and this is a perfect example of why content creators shouldn't let their politics mix with their work. Not helping matters is the fact that most of the comments sections on his videos are now filled with support from groups that are... exercising the RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement here... better suited to Jackson, Mississippi circa the 1960s than the modern zeitgeist. TL;DR: Fuck off, Jontron.
11th Feb '17 10:03:01 PM Sugarp1e1
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Sugarp1e1: Another commentator by the name of Doodletones has commentated on videos against Mr. Enter before (defending him despite not liking him anymore) and the way she sums up those videos can be applied here; "Mr. Enter is wrong because he's Mr. Enter". Seriously, it feels like this guy is only bad-mouthing these shows because Mr. Enter likes them and nothing else. Sure, he tries to argue, but his aruguments boil down to "I don't like these shows, therefore they're overrated bullshit". And that's ignoring the hypocrisy. He gets on Enter's case for being immature, yet he judges ''Steven Universe'' solely on the worst of its fanbase alone. I'm not even a big fan of Mr. Enter (who is, at best, a GuiltyPleasure of mine), and this still bothered me.
11th Feb '17 8:47:50 AM shonengirl
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** shonengirl: Third. This is hands down, the worst thing in the history of his channel. Two things I [[BerserkButton absolutely hate]] are when reviewers seem to know little about what they're talking about, and when they lump things of varying quality into one mass and declare them all bad/judge them all solely on the quality of some of them or an unfortunate DorkAge. Basically, I despise CriticalResearchFailure... And him putting every single [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] reboot on that list just screamed both of these things. Okay Strider, what about the Tom and Jerry, Ninja Turtles, anything Mickey Mouse related, and Looney Toons reboots, are ''they'' bad too because their franchises have been around for a long time and have truckloads of reboots? No? Actually, what ''about'' Tom and Jerry? It's also a Hanna-Barbera franchise that has been around forever, if not even longer than [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]], but he conveniently forgets that, doesn't he? There are many LongRunners that continue to be loved to this day, so by this logic they're all bad simply because they've been around to see the civil rights movement... [[SarcasmMode Sure, Strider, sure]]. [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] was actually pretty solid and had deviated quite a bit from the normal episodic format, not to mention the series fills in a western animation niche that doesn't get filled often in the modern day, the genre of mystery. The only other modern cartoon in this genre I can think of is Gravity Falls, which ended, while [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] will continue filling this niche with a fresh new take every time. Oh yeah, what about counting movies as reboots? ...Huh?! I've disagreed with him before, sure, but respected his opinion because he's a genuinely nice person and entertaining on top of it; this was the only time I ever cringed at this guy's content ever. I'm not even a huge fan of [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]], but this was just bad! It just really reminds me of those people who think Pokémon is a series consisting of the same game released over and over again, or whining that Nintendo has no innovation despite many of their franchises evolving over the years. To make it worse, I criticised him for this, and if I didn't accidentally delete it, he apparently removed my comment. Come on, Strider, I expect more from you! Oh yeah, and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking how the hell is Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog a reboot?! Shouldn't video game adaptations have a list of their own?]]

to:

** shonengirl: Third. This is hands down, the worst thing in the history of his channel. Two things I [[BerserkButton absolutely hate]] are when reviewers seem to know little about what they're talking about, and when they lump things of varying quality into one mass and declare them all bad/judge them all solely on the quality of some of them or an unfortunate DorkAge. Basically, I despise CriticalResearchFailure... And him putting every single [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] reboot on that list just screamed both of these things. Okay Strider, what about the Tom and Jerry, Ninja Turtles, anything Mickey Mouse related, and Looney Toons reboots, are ''they'' bad too because their franchises have been around for a long time and have truckloads of reboots? No? Actually, what ''about'' Tom and Jerry? It's also a Hanna-Barbera franchise that has been around forever, if not even longer than [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]], but he conveniently forgets that, doesn't he? There are many LongRunners that continue to be loved to this day, so by this logic they're all bad simply because they've been around to see the civil rights movement... [[SarcasmMode Sure, Strider, sure]]. [[spoiler:Mystery Incorporated]] was actually pretty solid and had deviated quite a bit from the normal episodic format, not to mention the series fills in a western animation niche that doesn't get filled often in the modern day, the genre of mystery. The only other modern cartoon in this genre I can think of is Gravity Falls, which ended, while [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]] will continue filling this niche with a fresh new take every time. Oh yeah, what about counting movies as reboots? ...Huh?! I've disagreed with him before, sure, but respected his opinion because he's he seems like a genuinely nice person and is entertaining on top of it; this was the only time I ever cringed at this guy's content ever. I'm not even a huge fan of [[spoiler:Scooby-Doo]], but this was just bad! It just really reminds me of those people who think Pokémon is a series consisting of the same game released over and over again, or whining that Nintendo has no innovation despite many of their franchises evolving over the years. To make it worse, I criticised criticized him for this, and if I didn't accidentally delete it, he apparently removed my comment. Come on, Strider, I expect more from you! Oh yeah, and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking how the hell is Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog a reboot?! Shouldn't video game adaptations have a list of their own?]]



** shonengirl: The above two don't really bother me that much, since I know where he's coming from, except for the joke, but still it was just somewhat tasteless. However, his review of ''Anime/PokemonOrigins'' was just poorly made. Highlights include mistaking the year the first Pokemon games were released as 1995 (it's actually 1996, and to make this worse this was shown in a clip in the video itself) and mistaking 2015 as its 20th anniversary (so this wasn't a script error either), questioning why Team Rocket needs scientists and wild Pokemon to create and test the Master Ball, and apparently not knowing who Red, one of the most well-known and well-loved characters in the fandom, to the point of being a MemeticBadass, is. The worst and most cringeworthy part, however, has to be him seeing ''Origins'' being TruerToTheText of the original games as a flaw, and that it takes away the "charm" of the anime. Um... [[CompletelyMissingThePoint That's the point, bro]]. It's supposed to be a more faithful adaptation. Stop thinking about the main anime, that has almost nothing to do with ''Origins'', an adaptation of game canon, and the two should be kept as far, far away from eachother as possible. Anyone who is familiar with the Pokemon fandom will tell you that mixing up the games and anime is a major BerserkButton for many fans of the games, and it highly annoys me as well. You know why many fans of the games hate the anime? One of the reasons is that it deviates from the games so much like some obscure spinoff manga that never saw light outside of Japan, despite it being the face of the franchise to the general public. I don't hate the anime necessarily, but he's essentially saying it should have copied the style of the anime because... Togo berries and a vague "charm". Question, wouldn't that make ''Origins'' pointless? Also, people should just play the games to experience the story? I'm sorry... [[FlatWhat What]]. ...Excuse me, [[BigWhat WHAT?!]] Um, ok, then I guess every adaptation ever has no reason to exist! *facepalm* As if ''Origins'' doesn't have charm on its own. Hero, you obviously haven't been involved with the games in a long time, or at least are one of those extremely casual fans that still thinks the anime is the WordOfGod. I like your reviews usually, but please get gud, please.

to:

** shonengirl: Creator/{{shonengirl}}: The above two don't really bother me that much, since I know where he's coming from, except for the joke, but still it was and at worse find them just somewhat tasteless. However, his review of ''Anime/PokemonOrigins'' was just poorly made. Highlights include mistaking the year the first Pokemon games were released as 1995 (it's actually 1996, and to make this worse this was shown in a clip in the video itself) and mistaking 2015 as its 20th anniversary (so this wasn't a script error either), questioning why Team Rocket needs scientists and wild Pokemon to create and test the Master Ball, and apparently not knowing who Red, one of the most well-known and well-loved characters in the fandom, to the point of being a MemeticBadass, is. The worst and most cringeworthy part, however, has to be him seeing ''Origins'' being TruerToTheText of the original games as a flaw, and that it takes away the "charm" of the anime. Um... [[CompletelyMissingThePoint That's the point, bro]]. It's supposed to be a more faithful adaptation. Stop thinking about the main anime, that has almost nothing to do with ''Origins'�