Follow TV Tropes

Following

History CowboyBebopAtHisComputer / TableTopGames

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The second mistake - the one repeated on the first page - shows the black Queen on a light square (it's hard to tell if the white Queen is on a dark square on the cover, but the first page image does so). Both Queens start on their own coloured square.\\

to:

** The second mistake - the one repeated on the first page - shows the black Queen on a light square (it's hard to tell if the white Queen is on a dark square on the cover, but the first page image does so). Both Queens start on their own coloured square. As well as on the cover and first page, this mistake occurs numerous times throughout.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The first mistake is a board set up with Queen's Rook on a dark coloured square. That piece always start on a light coloured square.

to:

** The first mistake is a board set up with Queen's King's Rook on a dark coloured square. That piece always start on a light coloured square.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A bookazine (like a magazine but without adverts, except for other works from the publisher at the end) called "Chess for Beginners" was clearly designed by one, as the cover image contains ''two mistakes'', one of which is repeated on the first page:
** The first mistake is a board set up with Queen's Rook on a dark coloured square. That piece always start on a light coloured square.
** The second mistake - the one repeated on the first page - shows the black Queen on a light square (it's hard to tell if the white Queen is on a dark square on the cover, but the first page image does so). Both Queens start on their own coloured square.\\
What makes these mistakes even more embarrassing is that this was the ''Second Edition'''s cover; the First Edition's cover had neither mistake.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


** Virtually anything surrounding the [[YouCanPanicNow moral panic]] over ''Dungeons & Dragons'' that swept through certain religious demographics in the 70s and 80s was entirely dependent on blatant misreporting and exaggeration by MoralGuardians. Even a cursory examination of the rulebooks would show that the game is not, and never has been, related to HollywoodSatanism or the occult. That did not stop a lot of families from forbidding their children from playing the game and discarding any gaming materials, or writing many sternly worded letters to the editor about the "evils" of D&D.

to:

** Virtually anything surrounding the [[YouCanPanicNow [[MediaScaremongering moral panic]] over ''Dungeons & Dragons'' that swept through certain religious demographics in the 70s and 80s was entirely dependent on blatant misreporting and exaggeration by MoralGuardians. Even a cursory examination of the rulebooks would show that the game is not, and never has been, related to HollywoodSatanism or the occult. That did not stop a lot of families from forbidding their children from playing the game and discarding any gaming materials, or writing many sternly worded letters to the editor about the "evils" of D&D.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The [[WesternAnimation/DungeonsAndDragons animated adaptation]] really ''did'' have a character called "Dungeon Master". Of course, the series was only loosely based on the tabletop game and it's not as well known, so it's mostly irrelevant. Depending on how charitable you are, the series might itself be considered an example of the trope.

to:

** The [[WesternAnimation/DungeonsAndDragons [[WesternAnimation/DungeonsAndDragons1983 animated adaptation]] really ''did'' have a character called "Dungeon Master". Of course, the series was only loosely based on the tabletop game and it's not as well known, so it's mostly irrelevant. Depending on how charitable you are, the series might itself be considered an example of the trope.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** 99 times out of 100, this won't be their only {{egregious}} mistake, either.

to:

** 99 times out of 100, this won't be their only {{egregious}} JustForFun/{{egregious}} mistake, either.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* An epic fail shared by pretty much all the major UK tabloids (at a minimum, the Daily Mail, The Sun, [[http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/09/13/computer-mad-mum-starved-kids-115875-22557397/ Mirror]], [[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/7997601/Woman-obsessed-with-computer-game-left-children-to-eat-cold-baked-beans.html Telegraph]] and [[http://www.metro.co.uk/news/840709-mother-obsessed-with-computer-game-ignored-children-and-let-two-dogs-starve-to-death Metro]] all ran the story) about a mother of three neglecting her children and pets because she was obsessed with playing the board game Small World online. Leaving aside the obvious sensationalism (like kids eating cold baked beans with their fingers because the house apparently had tin openers but no spoons, and a thirteen-year-old doing nothing about the situation even when the dogs starved to death and were left to rot on the floor) the biggest issue is that ''there was no online version of Small World in existence'' at the time[[note]]The only digital version available back then was an iOS app that only supported local multiplayer. A second version with online play has since been released for multiple platforms[[/note]]. The articles contain accurate images and descriptions of the board game (except for a random shot of VideoGame/WarhammerOnline) and links to the parent company, but they have ''literally nothing'' to do with the case. It looks likely that the game involved is actually smallworlds.com, a completely unrelated SecondLife type of game, a journalist messed up the Google search somewhere, and the mistake propagated from there.

to:

* An epic fail shared by pretty much all the major UK tabloids (at a minimum, the Daily Mail, The Sun, [[http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/09/13/computer-mad-mum-starved-kids-115875-22557397/ Mirror]], [[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/7997601/Woman-obsessed-with-computer-game-left-children-to-eat-cold-baked-beans.html Telegraph]] and [[http://www.metro.co.uk/news/840709-mother-obsessed-with-computer-game-ignored-children-and-let-two-dogs-starve-to-death Metro]] all ran the story) about a mother of three neglecting her children and pets because she was obsessed with playing the board game Small World online. Leaving aside the obvious sensationalism (like kids eating cold baked beans with their fingers because the house apparently had tin openers but no spoons, and a thirteen-year-old doing nothing about the situation even when the dogs starved to death and were left to rot on the floor) the biggest issue is that ''there was no online version of Small World in existence'' at the time[[note]]The only digital version available back then was an iOS app that only supported local multiplayer. A second version with online play has since been released for multiple platforms[[/note]]. The articles contain accurate images and descriptions of the board game (except for a random shot of VideoGame/WarhammerOnline) and links to the parent company, but they have ''literally nothing'' to do with the case. It looks likely that the game involved is actually smallworlds.com, a completely unrelated SecondLife ''VideoGame/SecondLife'' type of game, a journalist messed up the Google search somewhere, and the mistake propagated from there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* An epic fail shared by pretty much all the major UK tabloids (at a minimum, the Daily Mail, The Sun, [[http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/09/13/computer-mad-mum-starved-kids-115875-22557397/ Mirror]], [[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/7997601/Woman-obsessed-with-computer-game-left-children-to-eat-cold-baked-beans.html Telegraph]] and [[http://www.metro.co.uk/news/840709-mother-obsessed-with-computer-game-ignored-children-and-let-two-dogs-starve-to-death Metro]] all ran the story) about a mother of three neglecting her children and pets because she was obsessed with playing the board game Small World online. Leaving aside the obvious sensationalism (like kids eating cold baked beans with their fingers because the house apparently had tin openers but no spoons, and a thirteen-year-old doing nothing about the situation even when the dogs starved to death and were left to rot on the floor) the biggest issue is that ''there was no online version of Small World in existence'' at the time[[note]]The only digital version available back then was an iOS app that only supported local multiplayer. A second version with online play has since been released for multiple platforms[[/note]]. The articles contain accurate images and descriptions of the board game (except for a random shot of WarhammerOnline) and links to the parent company, but they have ''literally nothing'' to do with the case. It looks likely that the game involved is actually smallworlds.com, a completely unrelated SecondLife type of game, a journalist messed up the Google search somewhere, and the mistake propagated from there.

to:

* An epic fail shared by pretty much all the major UK tabloids (at a minimum, the Daily Mail, The Sun, [[http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/09/13/computer-mad-mum-starved-kids-115875-22557397/ Mirror]], [[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/7997601/Woman-obsessed-with-computer-game-left-children-to-eat-cold-baked-beans.html Telegraph]] and [[http://www.metro.co.uk/news/840709-mother-obsessed-with-computer-game-ignored-children-and-let-two-dogs-starve-to-death Metro]] all ran the story) about a mother of three neglecting her children and pets because she was obsessed with playing the board game Small World online. Leaving aside the obvious sensationalism (like kids eating cold baked beans with their fingers because the house apparently had tin openers but no spoons, and a thirteen-year-old doing nothing about the situation even when the dogs starved to death and were left to rot on the floor) the biggest issue is that ''there was no online version of Small World in existence'' at the time[[note]]The only digital version available back then was an iOS app that only supported local multiplayer. A second version with online play has since been released for multiple platforms[[/note]]. The articles contain accurate images and descriptions of the board game (except for a random shot of WarhammerOnline) VideoGame/WarhammerOnline) and links to the parent company, but they have ''literally nothing'' to do with the case. It looks likely that the game involved is actually smallworlds.com, a completely unrelated SecondLife type of game, a journalist messed up the Google search somewhere, and the mistake propagated from there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* While in Spain, role-playing games never were targeted by MoralGuardians as in US, things changed in TheNineties [[https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimen_del_rol when a man was killed while waiting the bus by two students]] (warning: link in Spanish). Once the Police registered the houses of the murderers, agents found among other things a lot of RPG manuals and it was said than both played those games. That was all what was needed by ignorant, dishonest, or simply sensationalism, journalists to consider that kind of games as little less than evil incarnated even if the murderers almost never played role-playing games and in fact hated them[[note]]The "role-playing game" said to be played by one of them was just a mess invented by him with nothing of a real RPG[[/note]], up to movies where games where treated as such. The effects of that sensationalism last to this day, even if the sentence left clear role-playing games had nothing to see with the crime and the Ministry of Education and Science released articles about the many benefits of RPGs.

to:

* While in Spain, role-playing games never were targeted by MoralGuardians as in US, things changed in TheNineties [[https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimen_del_rol when a man was killed while waiting the bus by two students]] (warning: link in Spanish). Once the Police registered the houses of the murderers, agents found among other things a lot of RPG manuals and it was said than both played those games. That was all what was needed by ignorant, dishonest, or simply sensationalism, sensationalistic journalists to consider that kind of games as little less than evil incarnated even if the murderers almost never played role-playing games and in fact hated them[[note]]The "role-playing game" said to be played by one of them the two was just a mess invented by him with nothing of a real RPG[[/note]], up to movies where games where treated as such. The effects of that sensationalism last to this day, with some people considering role-playing games as dangerous, even if the sentence left clear role-playing games they had nothing to see with the crime and the Ministry of Education and Science released articles about the many benefits of RPGs.that form of entertainment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* While in Spain, role-playing games never were targeted by MoralGuardians as in US, things changed in TheNineties [[https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimen_del_rol when a man was killed while waiting the bus by two students]] (warning: link in Spanish). Once the Police registered the houses of the murderers, agents found among other things a lot of RPG manuals and it was said than both played those games. That was all what was needed by ignorant, dishonest, or simply sensationalism, journalists to consider that kind of games as little less than evil incarnated even if the murderers almost never played role-playing games and in fact hated them[[note]]The "role-playing game" said to be played by one of them was just a mess invented by him with nothing of a real RPG[[/note]], up to movies where games where treated as such. The effects of that sensationalism last to this day, even if the sentence left clear role-playing games had nothing to see with the crime and the Ministry of Education and Science released articles about the many benefits of RPGs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One French magazine had an article about ''TabletopGame/{{Warhammer 40000}}''. In it, they showed a picture with the caption of "Ultra-Marines [sic] disembarking from a Rhino." However, the Ultra-Marines [sic] are bright yellow (which would make them Imperial Fists) and the "Rhino" is a Land Raider. In perhaps the worst screw-up in the article, the Orks are referred to as "Tau". For the uninitiated- Orks are huge, green, and muscular, preferring close combat. The Tau are slender, bluish-grey, and hate close combat. Bonus points because the Tau and Orks are, in-universe, mortal enemies (at least from the Tau Perspective. Orks don't really give a damn who's on the receiving end of a choppa).

to:

* One French magazine had an article about ''TabletopGame/{{Warhammer 40000}}''. In it, they showed a picture with the caption of "Ultra-Marines [sic] disembarking from a Rhino." However, the Ultra-Marines [sic] are bright yellow (which would make them Imperial Fists) and the "Rhino" is a Land Raider. In perhaps the worst screw-up in the article, the Orks are referred to as "Tau". For the uninitiated- Orks are huge, green, and muscular, preferring close combat. The Tau are slender, bluish-grey, and hate close combat. Bonus points because the Tau and Orks are, in-universe, mortal enemies (at least from the Tau Perspective. Orks don't really give a damn who's on the receiving end of a choppa). This is a particularly strange example as whoever had captioned the picture clearly knew ''something'' about 40k (since Ultramarines, Rhinos and Tau are all things that exist), it's just that the things they knew about were not represented in that particular picture at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's always funny when a gaming publication gets something wrong about gaming, [[http://www.push-start.co.uk/all/articles/news/latest-gaming-news/announcements/sega-and-creative-assembly-nab-the-warhammer-license/ as in this article]] which used an image from ''40k'' in an article about [[TabletopGame/{{Warhammer}} the other]] ''TabletopGame/{{Warhammer}}'' (namely that [[VideoGame/TotalWar Creative Assembly]] has gotten the license to make a ''WFB'' RTS).

to:

** It's always funny when a gaming publication gets something wrong about gaming, [[http://www.push-start.co.uk/all/articles/news/latest-gaming-news/announcements/sega-and-creative-assembly-nab-the-warhammer-license/ as in this article]] which used an image from ''40k'' in an article about [[TabletopGame/{{Warhammer}} the other]] ''TabletopGame/{{Warhammer}}'' (namely that [[VideoGame/TotalWar Creative Assembly]] Creator/CreativeAssembly has gotten the license to make a ''WFB'' RTS).''[[VideoGame/TotalWarWarhammer WFB]]'' [[VideoGame/TotalWarWarhammer RTS]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* An epic fail shared by pretty much all the major UK tabloids (at a minimum, the Daily Mail, The Sun, [[http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/09/13/computer-mad-mum-starved-kids-115875-22557397/ Mirror]], [[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/7997601/Woman-obsessed-with-computer-game-left-children-to-eat-cold-baked-beans.html Telegraph]] and [[http://www.metro.co.uk/news/840709-mother-obsessed-with-computer-game-ignored-children-and-let-two-dogs-starve-to-death Metro]] all ran the story) about a mother of three neglecting her children and pets because she was obsessed with playing the board game Small World online. Leaving aside the obvious sensationalism (like kids eating cold baked beans with their fingers because the house apparently had tin openers but no spoons, and a thirteen-year-old doing nothing about the situation even when the dogs starved to death and were left to rot on the floor) the biggest issue is that ''there is no online version of Small World in existence''. The closest thing is the iPad version, which you can only play locally, like the real board game. The articles contain accurate images and descriptions of the board game (except for a random shot of WarhammerOnline) and links to the parent company, but they have ''literally nothing'' to do with the case. It looks likely that the game involved is actually smallworlds.com, a completely unrelated SecondLife type of game, a journalist messed up the Google search somewhere, and the mistake propagated from there.

to:

* An epic fail shared by pretty much all the major UK tabloids (at a minimum, the Daily Mail, The Sun, [[http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/09/13/computer-mad-mum-starved-kids-115875-22557397/ Mirror]], [[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/7997601/Woman-obsessed-with-computer-game-left-children-to-eat-cold-baked-beans.html Telegraph]] and [[http://www.metro.co.uk/news/840709-mother-obsessed-with-computer-game-ignored-children-and-let-two-dogs-starve-to-death Metro]] all ran the story) about a mother of three neglecting her children and pets because she was obsessed with playing the board game Small World online. Leaving aside the obvious sensationalism (like kids eating cold baked beans with their fingers because the house apparently had tin openers but no spoons, and a thirteen-year-old doing nothing about the situation even when the dogs starved to death and were left to rot on the floor) the biggest issue is that ''there is was no online version of Small World in existence''. The closest thing is existence'' at the iPad version, which you can time[[note]]The only digital version available back then was an iOS app that only supported local multiplayer. A second version with online play locally, like the real board game.has since been released for multiple platforms[[/note]]. The articles contain accurate images and descriptions of the board game (except for a random shot of WarhammerOnline) and links to the parent company, but they have ''literally nothing'' to do with the case. It looks likely that the game involved is actually smallworlds.com, a completely unrelated SecondLife type of game, a journalist messed up the Google search somewhere, and the mistake propagated from there.

Top