This is discussion archived from a time before the current discussion method was installed.
Mr Blonde 267
: This article seems like it's written entirely from the perspective of someone who doesn't like the series. I acknowledge that not everybody liked it, but the book also received a lot of good critical reception and was
liked by many fans. I'm not saying that this article should be glowing praise, but perhaps some rewording is in order if only to balance it out? It was controversial, but a lot of the things that made it controversial are the same things that made it so popular.
: I agree. This article was written with extreme bias. I'll try and fix it later. After I finish it.
- biznizz: I originally wrote this page myself (mostly the outline, maybe a trope or two), along with others listed on my page. I actually liked this story, but disliked the rape ending up being nearly irrelevant, at least for Sue. But I know people hated this story and I just didn't want a backdraft to explode (but then again, I knew what to expect since I decided to create a page for Identity Crisis). Thank you very much for making this a better page.
again: Moved the debate topics to Headscratchers
. Do with it as you will. Also touched up here and there to make the article in general seem less negative.