Follow TV Tropes

Following

Archived Discussion Main / EpilepticTrees

Go To

This is discussion archived from a time before the current discussion method was installed.


Random832: Incorrect is not the same as crazy - in what way is, for example, "snape is a vampire" crazy, apart from the fact that he's not a vampire? Up until the author said that he's definitely not, it was a completely plausible theory, and the bat imagery surrounding him has yet to be otherwise explained.

Ununnilium: ...no, Snape being a vampire is crazy because absolutely nothing in the books suggests he's a vampire. What bat imagery? >>

Seth: With some stories unless it is explicitly ruled out pretty much anything is plausable. I wouldnt be surprised if somehow in the last book you find out Voldermort is Harry's real father because its just the kind of thing Rowling would do.

Looney Toons: Ununnilium, as I recall there're explicit comments here and there in the books by characters that Snape's black robes look like bat wings at times, and I do recall at least one (probably tongue-in-cheek) speculation (by Ron, I believe) that Snape was actually a vampire, based on his pasty complexion and his tendency to stay in the Hogwart's dungeons at all times.

Random832: Right - just because JKR _says_ "there's nothing in the canon that supports that" doesn't mean it's true - there's plenty that supports it, it just happens to be false. A possible alternate explanation for the bat imagery could be, of course, an animagus form, but we're not really talking about Harry Potter anyway - I was using it as an example of the difference between Epileptic Trees and a plausible theory that simply doesn't turn out to be correct. EDIT: oops

Ununnilium: Eh, it's still not especially plausible. "Like bat wings" isn't an especially uncommon description of a long black cloak on an antagonist, and Ron's speculation was part of a series of Epileptic Trees theories the kids were throwing up in-character.

Anyway, there's a difference, even if we don't agree on which side of the line the "vampire Snape" theory falls. It's about evidence, primarily.

Random832: I think another, perhaps more important difference - and when I think about it probably actually what bugged me is - Snape as vampire (and many harry potter theories) don't try to explain anything - they take things that might or might not be meant as hints, and speculate on future directions the story might take - _not_ explanations to account for "current events".

Ununnilium: This is true - Snape being a vampire wouldn't really affect the plot, whereas, if the curtain Sirius fell through was a portal to Narnia and he couldn't get back because the White Witch had turned him into a stature, it would.

Mister Six: Just to go back to the original point: is the possibility of Snape being a vampire genuinely crazy considering it's set in a world with murderous trees, werewolves and dragons? I think not. "Snape is a unicorn disguised as a human" would be crazy, but as someone up there points out, even the characters speculate that he might be a vampire. This is in a different (much less crazy) league to saying that Lost's trees are 'epileptic' or that Harry's mum is an owl.

Ununnilium: It doesn't have to be something totally impossible, it just has to be a weird, unlikely explanation.

Pro-Mole: Given how J.K. writes, almost nothing is impossible. About the whole "vampire Snape" subject, a few comments, one leading to the other:
1) J.K. has the, IMHO, bad habit of inserting twists whenever she can. The basic structure of a Rowling Twist(goes as a good trope name, huh?) is: the author speculates(by impressions) and the characters speculates, thus it is wrong. Sometimes it goes pretty well, sometimes seems pretty like Ass Pull.
2) And that's why it is impossible for Snape to be a vampire: Rowling had given the clues, and even characters have gotten them, thus it simply can't be truth.
Thansk for reading. if you didn't, your mental health thanks you.


Mister Six: ...epileptic trees? What... what does that even mean?

Ununnilium: Trees with epilepsy. I'm surprised you haven't heard of this dreadful affliction, affecting over 15 thousand saplings every year.

Mister Six: Dude (or dudette), seriously. Please explain it because it's gnawing away at my mind.

Kizor: 'kay. The trope is named after a cheerfully insane theory on the nature of the monster in Lost, which went unseen for a good long time and was depicted with gruesome roars and the swaying of trees in the jungle. (I lost interest before I found out what it actually was.)

HeartBurn Kid: I don't think they ever did reveal what it was. The island still has a lot of mysteries to it.

Space Ace: OK, in the vein of the Lost Red Shirt dissing:

Kirk: Epileptic Trees. You ever watch Lost?
Spock: I have not.
Kirk: The trees that would shake on the island with the main guys on it — the survivors of the plane crash? They always shook and the show never explained why.
Spock: Yes?
Kirk: Yeah.
Spock: Sounds like urinarily-inadequate writing.

Janitor: See? Because the trees shook and flailed about, like ...

O, Jeez. I'm explaining a joke. Micturition deficit syndrome.

Looney Toons: Oh. And here I'm just thinking he's saying the writing is piss-poor...

Anonymous: Is it just me, or is the name of this trope utterly useless and in need of being replaced with a more intuitive one? I still have to check this page about 1 out of every 3 times I see this trope referenced on another page because I still can't remember what these utterly random words mean in conjunction with each other. Lost is extremely popular, but naming a trope after the whimsical speculation of one small wing of its fandom is a bit too far considering how much it crops up.

Fast Eddie: Yeah. It's just you.


Fly: The Yu Gi Oh GX example doesn't seem too crazy to me, considering they were, essentially, married for a day.


Ununnilium: Taking out "If they become detailed and popular enough, it leads to Wild Mass Guessing." Wild Mass Guessing is just a page on this wiki made so that the tropers can post their own fun, fanonical theories. It's not a term for a specific kind of theory.


Fast Eddie: pulling ...
Judging from the list below, one of the most common is contriving a Luke, I Am Your Father.
... as it is dealt with better at WMG, and it was stepping on the punchline.


Hmm. There is an odd use of the term Double Standard in the last few examples. Clarification?

Lexi Dizzle: People argue that the evidence that Shakespeare actually wrote Shakespeare is shaky and circumstantial at best, and claim that his works were really written by Marlowe or Bacon, for example, using equally (some would say more) dubious evidence to support their claim. Double Standard

Fast Eddie: Ah. The confusion is that the linked trope Double Standard is specific to the issue important to feminists. No biggy, making it non-linked fixes it.


Does anyone know where exactly the "trees on Lost are epileptic" theory first came up? Like, a message board, a review site, or what?

Fast Eddie: It first appeared on Television Without Pity.


Tanto: Naruto spoilers for the week of 4/10/08: Goddammit, Kishimoto fucking caved. He better have a damn good explanation for this.


"This Troper knows several people who've played roles on Springer. This tree isn't epileptic."

I thought, that tree's epilepsy was quite different - i.e. someone believed it's all real.


Kizor: Wiki schizophrenia. Useless unless cleaned up. I'm tired.

Fast Eddie: I'll just move it over to Wild Mass Guessing <clip>Shakespeare discussion</clip>


Ninjacrat: And re-pulling:

  • By the very nature of these games, the Dungeon Master can confirm or deny any such wild theory, even if they've been Jossed.
because A: the media under discussion is the game books, not what happens around the table, B: 'we can make stuff up lol' is not a very unique claim (fanfic?) and C: I can't help hearing it in the Simpson's Comic Book Shop Guy voice.

Ununnilium: Thanks for specifying why, this time. `.`v

And there's a crucial difference here, IMHO. Unlike a TV show, unlike a movie, unlike a comic strip or novel or one-act play, the whole point of an RPG is that you are the one creating the story. Even if there's a greater canon in the game books — which, note, there isn't always — you can freely throw that out, and yet still be said to be playing the same game as everyone else. It's a feature of the medium.


Shale Yanked this from the Face of Boe bit:

And recently disowned by the producers of Torchwood as a Red Herring. Not only was it mentioned in the Doctor Who series that the Face of Boe was the last of Boekind (implying a whole race), according to Torchwood's second season ("Adam", episode 05) Jack grew up in the 51st century on the Boeshane peninsula.

The Boeshane Peninsula thing was mentioned in the original reveal, So Yeah...


Charred Knight: Given that this is the equivalent of Fridge Logic, I deleted all examples to match Fridge Logic.

Prfnoff: Restored (by someone else). I vote for keeping the examples.

Charred Knight: Since I prefer to have important desicions like this in YKTTW I added it their. I just want to know why the hell you would treat two pages that serve the same purpose differently.

Ununnilium: ...how is this the equivalent of Fridge Logic? O.o

Charred Knight: I said that under the assumption that Fridge Logic was supposed to be a page dedicated to explaining what the hell It Just Bugs Me! was, just like how Epileptic Trees was a page dedicated to explaining what the hell Wild Mass Guessing is. Later I discovered that since It Just Bugs Me! was horribly named and no one had taken care of it, the place now no longer has anything to do with Fridge Logic, it's simply a place to ask questions about a series. Oh, and in case your wondering I am not making fun of Janitor, I am simply making fun of everyone on this wiki.


Ununnilium:

  • For that matter, far too many to count, like 911 conspiracy theories, or man not landing on the moon, or Barrack Obama being a Muslim, or...

Yeah, don't stuff a bunch of examples into one with no details.

  • The forums are also home to many threads wondering if the strip will convert to 4th Edition. The general consensus: It's doubtful it could even exist in 4th Edition.
    • The Giant has stated clearly on the (not often read) news page that it won't convert, but that he may include some 4e references from time to time. To quote the Giant: "If it really bothers anyone, simply imagine that the OOTS world follows someone’s homebrewed hybridization of 3.5 and 4th Editions, using bits and pieces from whichever ruleset they think works better."
    • One sign of this is found in the reference to power sources (a big factor in class design in 4th Edition) in this strip.

Gone all Thread Mode-y, and not really relevant in the first place.


Fast Eddie: The Eve thing got big enough for its own Wild Mass Guessing page.

//later: This seems to need more discussion...

  • Whenever a wrestler disappears for a while, and comes back with a different look, some fan who's entirely too clever for their own good starts spouting about how the original wrestler must have died or left the business, and this is "obviously" someone else doing the same gimmick. To this editor's knowledge, this is never actually true. If any of you are reading this, yes, that means that there was only one Undertaker and one Ultimate Warrior and one Kane ever. Seriously. You're making yourselves look ridiculous by insisting otherwise.
    • Actually, some heavily masked wrestlers have indeed by replaced before. Most notable is Doink The Clown, who was embodied by no less than four people. True to form for pro-wrestling, not all of them have survived to this day - although none of the replacements were due to death or those involved leaving the business (usually they just went to WCW).

HeartBurn Kid: OK, so I forgot a couple. I'll go ahead and add it back with a caveat.


Pro-Mole:Just a wee comment on what seems to be someone's comment inside an example:

"Apparently, they've never actually tried to stop the Internet from doing something"

Why would them, anyway? Could anyone be so idiotic as to do that? (Rethorical question; I do live in Brazil, you know...)


Randallw: May I just say when I was reading Making Money I leapt on the fact that the Patrician said Mr Bent was a model citizen to take it he was a Golem.

Ununnilium: Hah, neat.


Ununnilium: So why were the Shakespeare theories pulled out?


Semiapies: Under Endor Holocaust: "A recent issue of WIRED claims that this was done specifically in response to the fan theories" Nothing indicates what "this" refers to.


Nezumi: Fast Eddie, I know you meant well, but by nuking the entire contents of the examples section, you also removed some in-fiction examples that, by definition, don't belong in Wild Mass Guessing. These should either be restored, or relocated to an appropriate new trope.


    Former examples: 

Top