This is discussion archived from a time before the current discussion method was installed.
Count Spatula: I thought I should point out that spoiler text doesn't work with this new color scheme, so i thought it should perhaps be altered again or at least have this problem fixed.
Rebochan: How does one fix that anyway? I don't see what was wrong with the old color scheme. This one is awful.
Gloating Swine: This might exist, but the colour scheme is ugly as sin, and makes all the normal interface elements completely unreadable and unusable.
Big T: I can read it just fine. You might want to get your eyes checked. But even if you couldn't read it, a page being ugly and unusable would, of course, be against the spirit of the wiki.
Citizen: Hey! Parking meters! And you're walking around! Ha ha ha... that's so funny!
Medinoc: Was that a Moonside quote ?
Wascally Wabbit: Am I the only person in all the internets who finds white on black easier to read?
Citizen: I like the color scheme, and yes, Moonside. First thing that came to mind when I saw the page.
Magicalgnome: This was just begging to have "Or does it?" added to it. So I did.
Insanity Prelude: So why is Fo RKS against the wiki's mission but SPOON isn't?
Big T: Wrong place to post this, but I'll answer anyways. SPOON exists as a reminder to not use overly complicated titles for tropes. It's pretty much policy. FORKS, its counterpart, encourages the use of names that are difficult to understand, which is, of course, against the spirit of any wiki, let alone this one.
Myth Sage: Made a brief change to hide a Chekovs Gun. You know what I'm talking about.
In addition, does anybody think we should make this harder to find? I mean, like some sort of seedy underbelly of a city or something.
Z ippZapp: I'm sorry, but switching from a page with a white background to one with a black background rapes my eyes.
cheat-master30: Why doesn't someone change the colours of the buttons and wiki logo for this section? It horribly clashes with the dark background and white text at the moment, and it shouldn't take whoever's the editor about two minutes.
Octavo: Welcome to Moonside edisnooM ot emocleW. I would like to see this area in a Moonside color scheme.
Cassy: Since So Bad Its Horrible was moved here, shouldn't the entries on UweBoll and DavidGonterman be on the Darth Wiki too?
Wascally Wabbit: Removed the Made Of Fail blank link before someone is tempted, No. Just... No.
Rissa: This might Exist, but this index doesn't work. The small caps break it, the same way italics break indices. Should we leave it broken for the Darth Wiki grunge feel, or take out the AC: tags and have an index that works?
Insanity Prelude: Pre-tty sure that the note about racial/religious slurs is referring to Complain About Shows You Dont Like- and it's not like they cut that because just one person decided to diss (insert unacceptable target here). That page was a train wreck.
Great Pikmin Fan: At the picture: You could still see the hello kitty symbol on him. Not that evil, eh?
Inkblot: Apparently not. Should I get rid of the Hello Kitty symbol or leave him as he is (or better yet, turn the symbol upside-down)?
Anomaly: Based on one of the common wordings of Rule 34, I'm a bit worried about what the title of this page is inviting people to do with Trope-tan. Anyone with me?
Cliche: Okay, so why does Shrikesnest insist on putting back the bit about the predecessor to "Not Making This Up" Disclaimer that I shall not mention by name? All it does is stir up unnecessary bitterness on the page. (09/02/09)
Shrikesnest: A couple of reasons:
- 1) I think it's pretty funny. Based on the fact that someone else added the Wall Banger pothole to it, I don't think I'm the only one.
- 2) If e'er there were a place to stir up unnecessary bitterness, Darth Wiki is the spot.
- 3) Quit taking everything so goddamn seriously.
