Needs Help: Characters.Funbag Fantasy

The Content Policy decision was to keep Funbag Fantasy on the wiki, but the Characters page has multiple fanservice images for many of the female characters. All of them emphasise huge breasts.

More generally, there has been some conversation between the staff about where these sit on the sfw/nsfw line due to the way they're presented. So bringing this to IP for a view.

(IP has previously reviewed the work pages themselves, for similar reasons. SFW replacements were later added here).

We may not be able to find better images, given the nature of the work, but even if they're all deemed sufficiently sfw I don't think we need the duplication for some of them?

Shamsiel Shaharl

1.1 Main image

1.2 labelnote:Click to see her in Sideboob Story 1 and 2

1.3 labelnote:Click to see her in her queenly dress.

Roxanne De Desir

1.4 Main image

1.5 labelnote:Click to see her in Sideboob Story 1 and 2.

Luceria von Diamante

1.6 Main image

1.7 labelnote:Click to see her in Sideboob Story 1 and 2.

Gladys Von Wackenheim

1.8 Main image

1.9 labelnote:Click to see her in Sideboob Story 1 and 2.

Isis Petrovna Elenskaya

1.10 main image

1.11 labelnote:Click to see her in Sideboob Story 1 and 2.

Emeralia

1.12 Main image

1.13 labelnote:Click to see her in Sideboob Story 1 and 2.

Rosalyn

1.14 Main image

1.15 labelnote:Click to see her in her mermaid form.

Others

These characters are single image only, but following some discussion elsewhere about the fanservice, they're still being flagged here in case there's a wish to pull.

1.16 Nellis

1.17 Queen Aphrodia

1.18 Estoria

1.19 Queen Serebria

No comment from me on the sfw/nsfw "is it too fetishy?" question. I'll leave others to decide on that.

As a starting point on the other aspects, I'd say:

---

Remove all multiples:

• Cut 1.2 and 1.3
• Cut 1.5
• Cut 1.7
• Cut 1.9
• Cut 1.11
• Cut 1.13
• Weak cut for 1.15 - as the main Rosalyn image doesn't show legs or a tail, there's nothing especially new or informative about this. Mermaid Rosalyn looks like Rosalyn with a mermaid tail, and that's all.

---

Weak cut for the "forbidden fruit" caption on 1.6, too.

And I would suggest that any IP comment warns against adding any more multiple images without IP approval.

If we decide to completely pull any character's images, the comment should also refer back to IP for approval of any replacement (as we originally did with the work pages).

Edited by Mrph1 on May 4th 2024 at 8:05:51 PM

for your suggestion

Agree with that.

Everybody loves the me! I’m a great athlete!

Keep 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 1.10, 1.12, 1.14, 1.15 and all in the Others section.

How are 1.1 and 1.2 significantly different? I'm not seeing it.

The art for this work, to me, falls under the "who the heck are you trying to kid here" level of implausible deniability. Cut all.

It's not a matter of "percent coverage" or "how realistic is this figure". The art is blatantly and undeniably aimed at a fetish demographic. I would be embarrassed (and possibly fired) if someone saw me reading the article at work.

Edited by Fighteer on May 4th 2024 at 3:46:51 PM

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"

to removing the images.

“Perky” is a common descriptor for breasts, so if the images stay, I think the caption on 1.1 should be changed. I wouldn’t think it was inappropriate in any other situation, but the “forbidden fruit” caption and the game being what it is make me think it’s a deliberate Double Entendre.

Edited by loserswithwifi on May 4th 2024 at 10:14:37 AM

Agree with post 5. Remove all the captions too.

I'm just a psycho, babe! Come and go out my mind. I didn't lose it, babe! There wasn't much to find.

Yeah, I say cut them all.

Crowner?

"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."

Another option could be to crop to headshots, which would allow for still having a character image without without the o h h o n e y aspects.

Edited by plakythebirb on May 4th 2024 at 7:06:08 AM

Welcome to Ideal's World

Could work but feels weird to do it just because their boobs are too big.

That's not the issue, the problem is that most of the images have clearly visible pokies.

Cropping to shoulders-up could work as a solution.

Sure. I'd be fine with that.

"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."

Could we just crop their "main" images and cut all the multiples? (One or two of these I still left showing the entire bust if only because I thought the fell into the "big but not unbelievably so" category).

Shamsiel Shaharl:

Roxanne De Desir:

Luceria von Diamante:

Gladys Von Wackenheim:

Isis Petrovna Elenskaya:

Emeralia:

Rosalyn:

Nellis:

Queen Aphrodia:

Estoria:

Queen Serebria:

Edited by GracieLizzy on May 4th 2024 at 12:20:23 PM

Works for me.

Welcome to Ideal's World

Still prefer my suggestion in 5, but at least in the crops it's still clear that World of Buxom applies. Maybe crop all men too to keep it more consistent?

Sure.

to all in 15.

I'm just a psycho, babe! Come and go out my mind. I didn't lose it, babe! There wasn't much to find.

15

Those crops really don't help.

Again, the work sells itself on blatant sex appeal. That's the point of the art. There is no crop, other than to their faces alone, that would avoid this problem.

I'm genuinely surprised by the attitude expressed here. "Not fooling anyone" is my criterion, not some arbitrary percentage of skin showing.

Edited by Fighteer on May 4th 2024 at 8:10:43 AM

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"

I think you are over worrying, yes it's the point but the crops at least indicate the World of Buxom / nature of the designs without showing to an extent that could be NSWF. We're not trying to hide the nature of the work we're just trying to provide a SWF presentation of it.

Kinda feels like we should be hiding it, though. "Here is some art of characters with absurdly large breasts. Click through for the rest."

Props for honesty, but I feel exploited.

Edited by Fighteer on May 4th 2024 at 8:16:31 AM

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"

Isn't this more to make TVT less likely to get Google Ad Sense demonetized? I'd rather have character images on a page even if we have to have work arounds than not. And as a bigger busted girl myself who does get annoyed at the idea BIG BEWBS = SEX (though these ones are definitely designed for sex appeal reasons before anything else) I wanted to at least still leave it obvious that these girls are busty but at least tame down the images so visible nipples and side/underboob weren't an issue.

On the top of cropping the men, for consistency we probably should. Lute Hende & King Bazalt I seem to have square crops already? So here's the others:

Argent de Bonn:

Count Matiere de Roche:

Marquis Cuvier: